The present invention generally relates to a method and system for creating an accurate skills inventory for skills retained by each independent human resource within a business concern. More particularly, the invention relates to a method and system that generates a metric for each resource, e.g., employee, contractor, etc., at the disposal of the business with respect to each of several identifiable skills.
To be competitive in the market, it is important for a business to have an accurate skills inventory. That is, it is important for the business to accurately keep track of all of the available skill resources the business has at its disposal. Furthermore, because the acquisition of new skills as well as the expansion of existing skills for a given individual is constantly changing, for example, as individuals gain experience with respect to different tasks, it is increasingly more important for the business to be cognizant of its available skills. The cost of using inaccurate skills data can be very high and potentially lead to less efficient operation of the business, low customer satisfaction, erroneous site selection to deliver a service, etc.
Also, skills are a unit of measure by which services deals are costed and priced. Accordingly, maintaining accurate skills data is non-trivial. In accordance with at least some known related art methodology, skills databases are deterministically populated using an employee's “claimed” skills, a practice that does not reflect the “true” skill value. Also, as employees evolve in their job, the skills may not be updated to reflect the evolving skill value.
Although this information is beneficial to a degree, it is not completely accurate. For example, the information provided is done so by the employee and may not reflect the actual proficiency this employee has attained regarding the specified skills. Instead, the data only indicates years of experience, which does not always reflect an accurate level of proficiency. Further, the data provided regarding the number of years is very discrete. That is, it is provided in one year increments. It is unlikely that the employee has exactly five, ten and four years, respectively, experience with each of the skills. It is more likely that the respective amount of experience for each skill includes a partial year.
Accordingly, it is desirable to provide a method and a system for accurately assessing and storing the skills available to a business with respect to each employee and other human resources available.
Illustrative, non-limiting embodiments of the present invention address the aforementioned and other disadvantages associated with related art methods of skills inventory development and maintenance. In particular, in accordance with the present invention, the above and other drawbacks related to known skill data management are addressed by capturing, observing and analyzing data from runtime operations that impact skill values corresponding to the human resources of a business group.
In accordance with one exemplary embodiment, a method of establishing a skills inventory is provided, the method comprising monitoring the activity of a resource object with respect to an activity performed by the resource object, wherein the activity performed requires at least one skill identified in a list of specified skills, extracting data relevant to the at least one skill from results of said monitoring, computing a metric value indicative of a skill level attained by the resource object with respect to each of the at least one skill and updating a skills inventory database with the computed metric value.
According to a further exemplary embodiment of the invention, a computer program product for providing a service to reuse IT system knowledge is provided, the program product comprising a computer readable medium, first program instruction means for monitoring the activity of a resource object with respect to an activity performed by the resource object, wherein the activity performed requires at least one skill identified in a list of specified skills, second program instruction means for extracting data relevant to the at least one skill from results of said monitoring, third program instruction means for computing a metric value indicative of a skill level attained by the resource object with respect to each of the at least one skill, and fourth program instruction means for updating a skills inventory database with the computed metric value.
According to a further exemplary embodiment of the invention, a system for establishing an accurate skills inventory is provided. A system in accordance with this embodiment comprises means for monitoring at least one activity performed by a resource object (e.g., a first server portion), wherein the activity performed requires at least one skill identified in a list of specified skills; means for extracting data (e.g., the first server portion), wherein the data is relevant to the at least one skill from results of the monitoring of the activity; means for computing a metric value (e.g., a second server portion), wherein the metric value is indicative of a skill level attained by the resource object with respect to each of the at least one skill and means for updating a skills inventory database with the computed metric value (e.g., the second server portion). This embodiment further may include a skills inventory database that comprises at least one record corresponding to the resource object and each record comprises at least one independent metric value corresponding to a skill that the resource object possesses.
According to an even further exemplary embodiment of the invention, a system for establishing an accurate skills inventory is provided where the system comprises a first server portion operable to execute a skills data retrieval application, wherein the skills data retrieval application receives data from a runtime application that monitors the performance of a resource object while the resource object performs at least one task and a second server portion operable to calculate at least one metric value corresponding to the at least one task performed by the resource object, wherein each metric value accounts for a plurality of predetermined parameters relevant to its respective task.
The present invention is related to the IT services area and, thus many technology-specific terms are used in describing the invention and providing the environment in which it operates. Skilled artisans would understand the intended meaning of the technology-specific terms used below, however, the following, non-exhaustive list of term definitions is provided to assist the reader. Although the list below provides a general definition of the respective terms, the definitions provided are not meant to be limiting. That is, the definitions provided are not exclusive and one skilled in the art should apply alternative or modified definitions where appropriate.
Employee Database: A database that maintains employee records and information about their skill set. Typically maintained by the HR organization in a company.
Skills Taxonomy: A classification methodology for specifying the types of skills relevant to an organization. For example, in IBM's services business, a taxonomy called JRSS (Job Requisition Skill Set) is used.
Runtime System/Runtime Operations: Refers to any system maintained by an organization that tracks and captures the history of the work done by its employees.
Ticketing System: An example of a runtime system in the services business. Records and tracks the various IT systems management requests made by a customer. Information includes the names of person(s) who work on the requests through various stages, the time taken, the kind of IT system the request applies to, etc. Examples used in the services business (by IBM and others) include eESM, Remedy, Peregrine, etc.
Information Model/Data Model: Refers to a data structure imposed on top of the records/logs of a runtime system that extracts the relevant fields in the records for further processing.
Exemplary, non-limiting, embodiments of the present invention are discussed in detail below. While specific configurations and process flows are discussed to provide a clear understanding of the invention, it should be understood that the disclosed process flows and configurations are provided for illustration purposes only. A person skilled in the relevant art will recognize that other process flows and configurations may be used without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
An embodiment consistent with the present invention comprises a method to accurately capture a value indicative of a person's skill with respect to various skills impacted by the person's activities. More particularly, a value which is indicative of the person's skill level is calculated by observing and analyzing the data from runtime operations that gather data in near-real-time as the person is gaining, or in some cases losing, experience with respect to various skills.
In accordance with at least one embodiment, data from various information sources, for example, problem and change ticketing systems, is analyzed to determine what tasks a particular person has worked on in the recent past. The tasks are then mapped to a standard skills classification methodology, or taxonomy, such as IBM's JRSS skill codes, or another taxonomy for which skill values can be gleaned.
For each skill code relevant to the particular person, a metric is computed that captures the skill level. The computed metric takes into account various relevant parameters, such as, the number of relevant tasks completed by the person, the time that was required to complete the task(s) and how long ago these tasks were performed. The calculated metric, together with the skill codes, is associated with the particular person and stored in a database.
In addition to the parameters mentioned above, those skilled in the art would know that other parameters of interest can be used without straying from the spirit of the invention.
First, a metrics database M with one record for each employee is created. Each record further contains a sub-record for each type of skills the employee has. This sub-record includes a score assigned to the employee for that skill type. For an employee with unique identifier 1, the sub-record is referred to for skill type S, e.g., M(I,S).
The following represents exemplary pseudo-code for the calculation of the metric value. In particular, for each record r in the runtime log the following is performed:
When the above loop ends, each record in the runtime database will have been processed, each kind of skill an employee has exercised will have been identified, and a score will have been assigned to each such skill.
The function f can be very general, since we can store any information in the skill sub-records and pass it as a parameter to the next computation of the sub-record.
An exemplary environment in which the present invention might be used is in the context of a company's Help Desk. In particular, a resource object, such as an employee working at the Help Desk, performs various tasks to achieve a particular result. For instance, a Help Desk employee may be working remotely over a network to resolve a customer's IT-related problem.
According to one Help Desk method, when a customer calls into the Help Desk to report a problem, a “ticket” is created for that call. The ticket includes data such as, the particular problem; to what hardware and/or software components the problem relates; the time problem resolution began; the time the problem was resolved, or, in some cases the time problem resolution was abandoned; what steps were taken in pursuit of a resolution, and any other relevant data.
While the resource object is performing his or her job function to resolve the customer's problem, at least one runtime application, such as runtime applications 10 and 20, gather data with respect to the process the employee undertakes in resolving the issue. That is, runtime applications 10 and 20 capture data with respect to the performance of the resource. For example, a runtime application such as eESM (IBM's eEnterprise Solutions Management application), logs data relevant to change management. Another example of a runtime application that captures data relevant to the resource's performance is ManageNow, which logs data for problem management. In addition to the applications mentioned, those skilled in the art would understand that various runtime applications that capture relevant data can be used in accordance with the present invention. That is, any application, or number of applications, that captures data in accordance with a specified taxonomy, described below, can be used in accordance with this embodiment.
As illustrated in
Calculation of a metric in accordance with one exemplary embodiment of the present invention will now be described.
Using the Help Desk example discussed above, as an employee is working at the Help Desk, runtime programs such as eESM and ManageNow log data regarding the employee's performance. Data is extracted from the logs and an information model is imposed on the data using IBM's JRSS taxonomy.
According to this embodiment, three time periods are considered, i.e., periods 0, 1 and 2, each of a duration T. X(t) is the set of tickets closed in the tth time period, S(X(t)) is the total severity of these tickets, N(X(t)) is the number of tickets in the set and a is a weighting parameter. For example, a has a value less than 1 such that the larger values give more weight to activities performed by the resource object more recent in time and, alternatively, gives less weight to actions performed in the more distant past.
Based on the information model presented, the metric value for the given resource object with respect to a given skill is:
S(X(O))/N(X(O))X(1−a)2+S(X(1))/N(X(1))Xa(1−a)+S(X(2))/N(X(2))Xa
After the metric is calculated, the skills inventory is updated with the calculated skill value, i.e., metric value calculated, for the given resource object for the particular skill type.
The invention can take the form of an entirely hardware embodiment, an entirely software embodiment or an embodiment containing both hardware and software elements.
In a further embodiment, the invention is implemented in software, which includes but is not limited to firmware, resident software, microcode, etc.
Furthermore, the invention can take the form of a computer program product accessible from a computer-usable or computer-readable medium providing program code for use by or in connection with a computer or any instruction execution system. For the purposes of this description, a computer-usable or computer readable medium can be any apparatus that can contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device.
The medium can be an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system (or apparatus or device) or a propagation medium. Examples of a computer-readable medium include a semiconductor or solid state memory, magnetic tape, a removable computer diskette, a random access memory (RAM), a read-only memory (ROM), a rigid magnetic disk and an optical disk. Current examples of optical disks include compact disk-read only memory (CD-ROM), compact disk-read/write (CD-R/W) and DVD.
A data processing system suitable for storing and/or executing program code will include at least one processor coupled directly or indirectly to memory elements through a system bus. The memory elements can include local memory employed during actual execution of the program code, bulk storage, and cache memories which provide temporary storage of at least some program code in order to reduce the number of times code must be retrieved from bulk storage during execution.
Input/output or I/O devices (including but not limited to keyboards, displays, pointing devices, etc.) can be coupled to the system either directly or through intervening I/O controllers.
Network adapters may also be coupled to the system to enable the data processing system to become coupled to other data processing systems or remote printers or storage devices through intervening private or public networks. Modems, cable modem and Ethernet cards are just a few of the currently available types of network adapters.
It would be understood that a method incorporating any combination of the details mentioned above would fall within the scope of the present invention as determined based upon the claims below and any equivalents thereof.
Other aspects, objects and advantages of the present invention can be obtained from a study of the drawings, the disclosure and the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4835372 | Gombrich et al. | May 1989 | A |
5724262 | Ghahramani | Mar 1998 | A |
5734837 | Flores et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5765138 | Aycock et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5774661 | Chatterjee et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5826239 | Du et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5850535 | Maystrovsky et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870545 | Davis et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5884302 | Ho | Mar 1999 | A |
5937388 | Davis et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6049776 | Donnelly et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6131085 | Rossides | Oct 2000 | A |
6249769 | Ruffin et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6263335 | Paik et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6339838 | Weinman, Jr. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6363384 | Cookmeyer, II et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6438594 | Bowman-Amuah | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6453269 | Quernemoen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6473794 | Guheen et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6496209 | Horii | Dec 2002 | B2 |
6523027 | Underwood | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526387 | Ruffin et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526404 | Slater et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6618730 | Poulter et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6675149 | Ruffin et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6738736 | Bond | May 2004 | B1 |
6810383 | Loveland | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6865370 | Ho et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6879685 | Peterson et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6907549 | Davis et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6970803 | Aerdts et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6988088 | Miikkulainen et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6988132 | Horvitz | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7010593 | Raymond | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7039606 | Hoffman et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7114146 | Zhang et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7236966 | Jackson et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7260535 | Galanes et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7293238 | Brook et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7315826 | Guheen et al. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7364067 | Steusloff et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7403948 | Ghoneimy et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7412502 | Fearn et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7467198 | Goodman et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7562143 | Fellenstein et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7580906 | Faihe | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7707015 | Lubrecht et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
20010047270 | Gusick et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020019837 | Balnaves | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020055849 | Georgakopoulos et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020091736 | Wall | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020111823 | Heptner | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020140725 | Horii | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147809 | Vinberg | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161875 | Raymond | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169649 | Lineberry et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020186238 | Sylor et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004746 | Kheirolomoom et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018629 | Namba | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018771 | Vinberg | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033402 | Battat et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030065764 | Capers et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030065805 | Barnes | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097286 | Skeen | May 2003 | A1 |
20030101086 | San Miguel | May 2003 | A1 |
20030154406 | Honarvar et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030187719 | Brocklebank | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030225747 | Brown et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040024627 | Keener | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040158568 | Colle et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040172466 | Douglas et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040181435 | Snell et al. | Sep 2004 | A9 |
20040186757 | Starkey | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040186758 | Halac et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199417 | Baxter et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050027585 | Wodtke et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050027845 | Secor et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050066026 | Chen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050091269 | Gerber et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050114306 | Shu et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050136946 | Trossen | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050138631 | Bellotti et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050159969 | Sheppard | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187929 | Staggs | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050203917 | Freeberg et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050223392 | Cox et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060067252 | John et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060069607 | Linder | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060112036 | Zhang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060112050 | Miikkulainen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060129906 | Wall | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060168168 | Xia et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060178913 | Lara et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224569 | DeSanto et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060224580 | Quiroga et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060235690 | Tomasic et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060282302 | Hussain | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060287890 | Stead et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070043524 | Brown et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055558 | Shanahan et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073576 | Connors et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070073651 | Imielinski | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083419 | Baxter et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070118514 | Mariappan | May 2007 | A1 |
20070168225 | Haider et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070219958 | Park et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070234282 | Prigge et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070282470 | Hernandez et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282644 | Diao et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282645 | Brown et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282653 | Bishop et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282655 | Jaluka et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282659 | Bailey et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282692 | Bishop et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282776 | Jaluka et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282876 | Diao et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282942 | Bailey et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070288274 | Chao et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070292833 | Brodie et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080065448 | Hull et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080109260 | Roof | May 2008 | A1 |
20080213740 | Brodie et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080215404 | Diao et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090012887 | Taub et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2007143516 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070282622 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |