1. Technical Field
The present teaching is related to analog circuit design. More specifically, the present teaching is related to a method of and system for low noise bandgap reference circuit and systems incorporating the same.
2. Discussion of Technical Background
Bandgap voltage references are generally produced by summing a Proportional To Absolute Temperature (PTAT) voltage and a Complementary To Absolute Temperature (CTAT) voltage together to generate a temperature independent voltage. A CTAT voltage can be produced using a diode or diode connected Bipolar Junction Transistor (BJT). A PTAT voltage can be produced by developing a voltage across a resistor with a PTAT current.
A ΔVBE circuit may be employed to generate a PTAT current using two BJTs with different current densities. The PTAT current used is usually proportional to the logarithm of the current density ratio of the two BJTs and can be mathematically described as IPTAT=ΔVBE/R=(VT/R)*ln(J1/J2). The logarithm function attenuates the ratio, making it necessary to use a large number of transistors in order to achieve a higher performance bandgap voltage reference.
A different approach of producing a large ΔVBE is to employ a “cross-connected quad”, illustrated in
On the other side, transistor 150 is coupled to a source of PTAT at the emitter terminal via a transistor 140. The collector of transistor 150 is connected to the single emitter of transistor 140 and the collector of transistor 140 is connected to the source of PTAT. The base of transistor 140 is directly connected to the base of transistor 120, which is connected to its own collector. Transistor 150 is coupled to the ground at its emitter via a serially connected resistor 160. The collector of transistor 150 is connected to the base of transistor 130.
In this illustrated circuit, a ΔVBE is developed that is proportional to the logarithm of the product of the ratio of emitter current densities. Specifically, the ΔVBE can be characterized to be ΔVBE=VT*ln[(J2*J3)/(J1*J4)] or ΔVBE=VT*ln[(N*M)], where N and M are the current density ratios of transistor 120 to transistor 140 and transistor 150 to transistor 130, respectively. It is clear that to achieve a larger ΔVBE, it is more efficient to use a method that incorporates a product of current density ratios.
There are other conventional approaches to bandgap cell design, including the Widlar cell, Brokaw cell, and Dobkin cell. A Dobkin cell is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 4,447,784 and depicted in
As can be seen in
Mathematically, the ΔVBE produced by the Dobkin cell is described as ΔVBE=VT*ln(J2/J1). In this expression, VT=kT/q is the thermal voltage with k being the Boltzman's constant (1.38*10−23 Joules/Kelvin), T an absolute temperature in Kelvin, and q an electronic charge (1.602*10−19 Coulomb). J1 and J2 are the current densities of transistors Q1 and Q2, respectively. Such a current density is dependent on transistor area A and the magnitude of current I going through the collector of the transistor. Accordingly, the ΔVBE is proportional to J2/J1=(I2*A1)/(I1*A2). Based on this observation, it can be seen that a design of a ΔVBE generator can include appropriate ratios of either current or the area. When the current flowing through both transistors is identical, the emitter areas become the only factor that will determine the value of ΔVBE=Vt*ln(A1/A2).
In some prior art solutions, the error amplifier 250 is implemented based on a circuit shown in
VOUT=(1+R4/R3)*VT*ln(N)+VBE3
This voltage loop forces the error amplifier to drive a PTAT current into resistor R3, R4, and transistor 265 whose sum of voltage drops develops the bandgap output voltage. Note that the above circuit is a series voltage reference and Dobkin's original circuit is a shunt voltage reference.
It can be seen that to achieve a larger ΔVBE, a large ratio N of transistors is needed and, hence, a larger die area. In general, the higher the ratio N, the larger the die area. A larger die area costs more. When a ΔVBE for a high performance bandgap voltage reference is needed, the cost may become a serious concern. For example, a reasonable ΔVBE for a high performance bandgap voltage reference is about 108 mV at 25° C. Without stacking as in
The inventions claimed and/or described herein are further described in terms of exemplary embodiments. These exemplary embodiments are described in detail with reference to the drawings. These embodiments are non-limiting exemplary embodiments, in which like reference numerals represent similar structures throughout the several views of the drawings, and wherein:
The present teaching relates to an improved apparatus and method for generating a large ΔVBE without using a large number of transistors and without increasing the input voltage beyond that of a non-stacked bandgap cell. Consequently, ΔVBE can be increased without consuming a large die area. In addition, the present teaching also aims at enhancing the performance of bandgap references via increasing the voltage of a ΔVBE generator with reduction in bandgap output voltage noise.
In accordance with the present teaching, to reduce the number of transistors used in producing a larger ΔVBE, stacking is applied. For instance, to produce a ΔVBE of 108 mV at 25° C., two stacks each having an 8:1 ratio can be used. Therefore, a total of 18 transistors can achieve the same level of performance as 65 transistors used in the prior art. This yields a significant reduction of transistors used, which provides exponential reduction in the number of transistors.
Although prior art solutions also adopt stacking, the present teaching stacks multiple ΔVBEs in a manner that does not increase noise, but rather decreases noise, and no additional input voltage beyond that of a non-stacked architecture is required. That is, the same input voltage required for a single ΔVBE stack is used for a ΔVBE generator with multiple stacks with the same ΔVBE voltage. Using a similar example as discussed previously, without stacking, to achieve a ΔVBE of 216 mV, a ratio of 2191:1 transistors would be required. In accordance with the stacking approach disclosed herein, four stacks each having an 8:1 ratio can be used to achieve 216 mV of ΔVBE with the same input voltage. In other words, theoretically 36 transistors could achieve the same level of performance as 2192 transistors without increasing the input voltage and still minimizing the noise.
The present teaching is illustrated in
Although prior art may also stack ΔVBES, the present teaching stacks additional ΔVBES in a way so that no additional input voltage is needed beyond that of a non-stacked bandgap cell. Moreover the stacking occurs where the ΔVBE resistor is between the base terminal of the BJTs. To increase ΔVBE, the illustrated embodiment shows that the first level of ΔVBE can be directly supplemented by adding a resistor, shown as R3A 470, on top of the existing resistor, R3475, and an additional emitter ratioed differential pair 450 and 455 with both emitters connected to transistor 460 to the ground. It is understood that although the illustrated embodiment applies stacking in the context of the Dobkin cell, the present teaching is not limited to such a particular context.
In some embodiments, identical stages may be employed. That is, the tail current sources Q5 435 and Q6 460 are identical. The ΔVBE generators, Q1 430/Q2445 and Q1A 450/Q2A 455, also have identical current density ratios, say N. The current density ratio can be set by varying the emitter areas, the currents, or both in the corresponding ΔVBE devices. Consider a Dobkin cell where a ΔVBE generator comprises Q1, Q2, and R3. An expression to describe the circuit by going around a closed loop containing these devices is
VBE1+VBE2+VR3=0
where VR3 is the voltage drop across R3475 and VBE1 and VBE2 are the emitter base voltages of devices Q1 430 and Q2 445, respectively. As one skilled in the art of bandgap reference design would recognize,
VBE=VT*ln(IC/(IS*A))
where VT is the thermal voltage, Ic is the collector current, IS is the saturation current, and A is the emitter area. The argument of the natural logarithm term is called the current density as earlier denoted as J. The voltage across R3 is given by the expression VR3=I1*R3, where I1 is the current through R3. Combining the natural logarithm terms discussed above, this equation becomes
I1=VT/R3*ln(N)
where N is the current density ratio of devices Q1 430 and Q2 445.
When stacking is applied in a manner as disclosed herein, the expression for VOUT can be similarly derived. Referring to
VOUT=VR3A+VR3+VR4+VBE3
Assuming that the base currents of Q1, Q2, Q1A, Q2A can be ignored, this expression can be rewritten as
VOUT=*(R3A+R3+R4)+VBE3
Where I1 is the current in resistor R3A 470, R3 475, R4 480, and Q3 485 without the base currents. Considering the closed loop containing the two stacked ΔVBE generators, we have
VR3A+VR3+VBE1−VBE2+VBE1A−VBE2A=0
Solving for the current I1 yields
I1=VT/(R3A*R3)*ln(N2).
Substituting the previous equation, we can derive the expression for VouT as follows
VOUT=(1+R4/(R3A+R3))*VT*ln(N2)+VBE3
In this expression, the first term corresponds to the PTAT term and the second term corresponds to the CTAT term. The natural logarithm term includes an exponent denoting the multiplying effect of stacking two ΔVBE generators.
By mathematical operation, the exponent in the natural logarithm term can be moved to the front of the PTAT term, making clear the multiplicative effect of the stacking described herein. That is
VOUT=2*(1+R4/(R3A+R3))*VT*ln(N)+VBE3.
The effect of the added stage is apparent in this derived equation where the PTAT term is doubled. Therefore, by stacking ΔVBE generators in accordance with the present teaching described herein, the efficient multiplicative effect makes it possible to have much less die area to achieve the same result. In addition, the stacking as described herein does not need additional larger input voltage, as many architectures that achieve a multiplying effect of current densities would require.
The required increase of input voltage for the present teaching is directly proportional to the increase in ΔVBE as would be for a non-stacked architecture such as a Widlar or Brokaw cell. This is usually on the order of 100 mV. For example, if a 100 mV ΔVBE is desired, using an architecture without stacking, a current density ratio of 48:1 is required. This in turn requires a total of 49 transistors. With our embodiment using two identical stages the same ΔVBE can be developed using a current density ratio of 7:1 for a total of 16 transistors.
When additional increase in ΔVBE is needed, more stages can be added as shown in
VOUT=(1+R4/(R3B+R3A+R3))*VT*ln(N3)+VBE3, or
VOUT=3*(1+R4/(R3B+R3A+R3))*VT*ln(N)+VBE3
Generally, there is no inherent limit to the number of stages that can be stacked in accordance with the present teaching. When there are K stages stacked together, assuming K identical stages each having current density ratio N:1, a general expression for the output voltage can be derived as
VOUT=K*(1+R4/(K*R3))*VT*ln(N)+VBE3
It is clear that the natural logarithm of the product of transistor ratios increases exponentially with respect to a conventional bandgap without a stacked ΔVBE generator.
The above discussion assumes that R3=R3A=R3B . . . and the emitter ratios, N, of the differential pairs are perfectly identical. In practice due to mismatches in manufacturing, this will not be the case. However, the current ratio in the differential pairs will be close enough to dynamically adjust so that the PTAT current through R3 is equal to the PTAT current through R3A.
As discussed herein, the stacking according to the present teaching also reduces noise. Specifically, noise reduction is achieved by breaking up the ΔVBE cell into multiple devices. When they are broken up, the noise in separate devices are uncorrelated, making the total noise a combination of RSS (root-sum-square) and, thus, smaller. As someone skilled in the art of analog design would recognize, devices at the input of the amplifier (e.g., error amplifier 465 in
In this embodiment, the emitter current density can be made arbitrarily large without much cost in the die area resulting in less gain needed. In addition, the overall PTAT resistance from various resistors, e.g., R3A, R3BB, . . . , is now broken up into several individual pieces. In a single stage ΔVBE generator, the noise with respect to this overall resistance is 4kTRB, where k is Boltzman's constant, T is temperature in Kelvin, R is the resistance, and B is the bandwidth. That is, when a single stage is used, the noise is a combination of the noise sources from that stage. When stacking as disclosed herein is applied (e.g., three stage stacking), since the overall PTAT resistor is broken up into several individual pieces in corresponding stacks, the resulting overall noise is root, sum, squared (RSS) together as an overall resistance. This is shown in the equation below
EnT=(ER32+ER3A2+ER3B2)1/2
where EnT is the total noise level and ER3, ER3A, ER3B are the noise sources from the three individual ΔVBE generators.
Particularly, when identical stages are stacked, the total noise combined is determined by E′n=En/√N, where En is the noise from each stage and N is the number of stages. Thus, the total noise level of the stacked ΔVBE generator is √N times less than that of each of the individual stages.
The above discussion is based on specific exemplary embodiments. Although not limiting, it is understood that there are various implementations that may be employed to realize the present teaching. For instance, in
The discussion above with respect to stacking is based on the assumption that the base current is ignored. Consider the double stacked Dobkin cell (shown in
When base current is taken into account in the analysis, it can be shown that in addition to the ideal output voltage terms PTAT and CTAT, an error due to base currents exists. To eliminate this error,
R5=R4*(3*R3A+R3)/(R3A+R3+R4)
When two identical stages are stacked, i.e., R3A=R3, this reduces to
R5=4*R3*R4/(2*R3+R4)
In some embodiments, as the number of stages and the ratio of emitter areas increase, the ΔVBE PTAT term may eventually exceed the VBE CTAT term, thus effectively eliminating resistor R4 (e.g., resistor 590 in
The first exemplary approach is to employ a VBE multiplier. This is illustrated in
The second exemplary approach is to employ two VBES and retain resistor, R4. This exemplary solution is illustrated in
In some embodiments, another approach may be employed to increase the ΔVBE. This is shown in
In some embodiments, still another approach may be adopted to increase the ΔVBE within a stage. In accordance with this approach, diode connected devices may be introduced in PTAT generators. This is shown in
There are other variations in implementing the present teaching. For example, NPN transistors may be replaced with PNP transistors. Without deviating from the present teaching, base current cancellation or curvature correction schemes may also be included in the implementations. In some embodiments, currents may be ratioed through ΔVBE cells to increase the ΔVBE. Devices used for current source(s) or error amplifiers may be based on MOSFETS. A shunt regulator instead of series regulator may also be employed. In implementing the error amplifier (e.g., 460, 580, 665, 755, 855, 950, 1050 in
In some embodiments, the diode connected device Q3 (see
While the inventions have been described with reference to the certain illustrated embodiments, the words that have been used herein are words of description, rather than words of limitation. Changes may be made, within the purview of the appended claims, without departing from the scope and spirit of the invention in its aspects. Although the inventions have been described herein with reference to particular structures, acts, and materials, the invention is not to be limited to the particulars disclosed, but rather can be embodied in a wide variety of forms, some of which may be quite different from those of the disclosed embodiments, and extends to all equivalent structures, acts, and, materials, such as are within the scope of the appended claims.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4249122 | Widlar | Feb 1981 | A |
| 4447784 | Dobkin | May 1984 | A |
| 4749889 | Lagoni et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 5325045 | Sundby | Jun 1994 | A |
| 6060874 | Doorenbos | May 2000 | A |
| 6288525 | Fischer | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 7242240 | Gierkink | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7595627 | Mahnke et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
| 7863882 | Harvey | Jan 2011 | B2 |