Processes that typically copy, backup, or duplicate data, such as Microsoft Exchange data (email messages, mail settings, and so on), are often laborious, time-intensive processes. The typical backup process connects to each user's mailbox and compares the entire contents (i.e., every message) of the mailbox with a previous backup copy of that mailbox. Often, the backup process will access every message in the mailbox to determine if anything has changed since a previous copy process occurred. Then, the backup process can perform a copy or backup operation, only after identifying the changes from the entire mailbox.
Additionally, typical email systems present changes to a user by only updating the user's mailbox with the change (such as by displaying a newly received email message at the top of a list of emails). However, certain emails may be related or similar to other previous messages, and although email systems can sort emails via simple header information (by user, date received, or alphabetically by subject), there are many instances where it may be advantageous to a user to employ an email system that provides other benefits.
There is a need for a system that overcomes the above problems, as well as providing additional benefits.
Described herein are a system, method and computer-readable storage medium storing instructions for controlling a computer system to perform a method of transferring an email message to a secondary copy of a data store associated with a mailbox. The method includes accessing an event sync file associated with a mailbox, wherein the event sync the includes indications of changes made to electronic mail messages within the mailbox, and creating a change journal to include entries associated with the changes made to the electronic mail messages within the mailbox. The method further includes identifying the changes made to the electronic mail messages within the mailbox from information within the change journal entries, and transferring the changes to the electronic mail messages within the mailbox to a secondary copy of data associated with the mailbox.
A method and system for identifying, copying, and leveraging changes to a data set, such as a data set on a Microsoft Exchange or other mail server, is disclosed. The system receives an alert or other signal from a mail server indicating a change to a data set at the mail server, stores an indication of the event in a log or other data structure, queries the log for information related to the event, and performs (or, initiates) a data storage operation based on results of the query.
For example, when an email message is deleted by a user in Microsoft Outlook, a supporting Exchange Server updates a synchronization file (such as an Event Sync file) to indicate that an event (such as an SMTP event), the deletion, has occurred within the user's mailbox. The system accesses the synchronization file, identifies the event, and stores information about the event (such as path information related to the location of the event and the type of event) into a log file, or change journal. Later, a data storage component accesses the change journal, queries the change journal to identify changes that have occurred during, a certain time period (such as since the last data storage operation), and uses the results of the query to determine changes to the mailbox, and copies or performs a backup of the changes. A change to a mailbox may be a received message, a moved message (such as from one folder to another), a deleted message, and so on.
In some examples, the system updates an index of content based on and after identifying changes to a mailbox via a change journal. A content indexing system may update an index associated with a mailbox or other data store by accessing the change journal to identify changes to the mailbox and indexing content related to those changes.
In some examples, the system updates an index of data classification based on and after identifying changes to a mailbox via a change journal. A data classification system may update an index associated with a mailbox or other data store by accessing the change journal to identify changes to the mailbox, and classifying data related to those changes.
In some examples, an email system may update, present, or modify the contents of a mailbox based on identifying changes to the mailbox. The email system may extract the content or classification of data within a changed email message, associate other messages similarly classified or containing similar content, and modify the mailbox to present the associated messages along with the changed message to a user. The system may synchronize a mailbox on a mobile device based on a change to the mailbox. In some cases, the system may modify the presentation of a mailbox to a user based on a change to the mailbox. The system may perform one or more actions based on a change to the mailbox.
The system will now be described with respect to various embodiments. The following description provides specific details for a thorough understanding of, and enabling description for, these embodiments of the system. However, one skilled in the art will understand that the system may be practiced without these details. In other instances, well-known structures and functions have not been shown or described in detail to avoid unnecessarily obscuring the description of the embodiments of the system.
The terminology used in the description presented below is intended to be interpreted in its broadest reasonable manner, even though it is being used in conjunction with a detailed description of certain specific embodiments of the system. Certain terms may even be emphasized below; however, any terminology intended to be interpreted in any restricted manner will be overtly and specifically defined as such in this Detailed Description section.
The system may create a secondary copy of a data set, such as a storage group containing one or more mailboxes, as part of an existing backup schedule performed by an organization. For example, an organization may perform weekly backups that contain a complete copy of the organization's email data. The system may create secondary copies using various data storage operations, such as snapshots, continuous data replication, and so on. Secondary copies may include backup copies, auxiliary copies, archive copies, and so on.
Referring to
Aspects of the system can be embodied in a special purpose computer or data processor that is specifically programmed, configured, or constructed to perform one or more of the computer-executable instructions explained in detail herein. Aspects of the system can also be practiced in distributed computing environments where tasks or modules are performed by remote processing devices, which are linked through a communications network, such as a Local Area Network (LAN), Wide Area Network (WAN), Storage Area Network (SAN), Fibre Channel, or the Internet. In a distributed computing environment, program modules may be located in both local and remote memory storage devices.
Aspects of the system may be stored or distributed on computer-readable media, including magnetically or optically readable computer discs, hard-wired or preprogrammed chips (e.g., EEPROM semiconductor chips), nanotechnology memory, biological memory, or other data storage media. Indeed, computer implemented instructions, data structures, screen displays, and other data under aspects of the system may be distributed over the Internet or over other networks (including wireless networks), on a propagated signal on a propagation medium (e.g., an electromagnetic wave(s), a sound wave, etc.) over a period of time, or they may be provided on any analog or digital network (packet switched, circuit switched, or other scheme). Those skilled in the relevant art will recognize that portions of the system reside on a server computer, while corresponding portions reside on a client computer, and thus, while certain hardware platforms are described herein, aspects of the system are equally applicable to nodes on a network.
The data management system 100 includes a data storage system 110 in communication with a mailbox group 140 that contains one or more mailboxes 150, such as a user1 mailbox 151, a user2 mailbox 152, and a userN mailbox 153. For example, the mailbox group may be a Microsoft Exchange group that manages various user mailboxes 150. The data storage system 110 and the mailbox group 140 may communicate over wired or wireless connections, such as via a storage network.
The data storage system 110 may include a log component 111, such as a component that stores a change journal, a copy component 112 that initiates or facilitates the performance of data storage operations, and other components 113, such as components that communicate with a data classification system 120, a content indexing component 130, and/or other components under management by the system.
The copy component 112 may transfer data to other components (not shown) of the data storage system 100 that transfer data to secondary storage media, such as magnetic tape, optical disks, solid-state media, and so on. The data storage system may contain some or all of the following components, depending on the needs of the system. For example, the data storage system 100 may contain a storage manager, one or more clients, one or more media agents, and one or more storage devices. The storage manager controls the media agents, which are responsible for transferring data to storage devices. The storage manager includes a jobs agent, a management agent, a database, and/or an interface module. The storage manager communicates with client(s). One or more clients may access or receive data to be stored by the system from a database via a data agent. For example, the clients may access data from one or more of the mailboxes 150 upon receiving instructions from the copy component 112. The system uses media agents, which contain databases, to transfer and store data into storage devices. The client databases may contain data files and other information, while media agent databases may contain indices and other data structures that assist and implement the storage of data into secondary storage devices, for example.
The data storage system may include software and/or hardware components and modules used in data storage operations. The components may be storage resources that function to copy data during storage operations. The components may perform other storage operations (or storage management operations) other that operations used in data stores. For example, some resources may create, store, retrieve, and/or migrate primary or secondary data copies. Additionally, some resources may create indices and other tables relied upon by the data storage system and other data recovery systems. The secondary copies may include snapshot copies and associated indices, but may also include other backup copies such as HSM copies, archive copies, and so on. The resources may also perform storage management functions that may communicate information to higher level components, such as global management resources within a federated data storage system. Further details regarding suitable data storage systems may be found in commonly-assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/982,324, filed on Oct. 31, 2007, entitled SYSTEMS AND METHODS OF HIERARCHICAL STORAGE MANAGEMENT, SUCH AS GLOBAL MANAGEMENT OF STORAGE OPERATIONS, which is incorporated by reference it its entirety.
In some examples, the system performs storage operations based on storage policies, as mentioned above. For example, a storage policy includes a set of preferences or other criteria to be considered during storage operations. The storage policy may determine or define a storage location and/or set of preferences about how the system transfers data to the location and what processes the system performs on the data before, during, or after the data transfer. In some cases, a storage policy may define a logical location in which to transfer, store or copy data from a source to a destination data store, such as storage media. Storage policies may be stored in the storage manager, or may be stored in other resources, such as a global manager, a media agent, and so on.
The log component 111 may access and/or communicate with components associated with a mail server, such as an event sync component, in order to identify changes in a data set. The log component 111 may create, update, modify, and/or store one or more logs of content, such as change journals. A change journal stores a journal entry whenever data is changed within a computer system. The change journal generally contains a step-by-step, sequential, or ordered log of what data changed and how the data changed that can be processed at a later time to recreate the current state of the data.
In some examples, the log component 111 stores a journal entry upon identifying a change within storage group 140. For example, the log component may access the event sync the of an Exchange server and store journal entries for all events identified in the event sync file.
Additionally, the log component 111 (or a separate component), may create an associated log or other data structure to parse the data within the change journal. For example, the log component 111 may create a SQL-based file to later query the SQL-based file when required, such as when a backup of a mailbox is to be performed.
As discussed herein, there is a standard mechanism in Microsoft Exchange, called an event sync mechanism, that sends a signal whenever there is a change in a mail server or storage group, such as a mail being sent, deleted, moved, or received. As discussed herein, aspects of the data storage system leverage the event sync mechanism (and other similar mechanisms) in order to quickly and efficiently copy and/or backup a storage group, such as a collection of mailboxes.
Referring to
In step 220, the system writes the signal indicating the event to a log file, such as a change journal stored within the log component 111. For example, the system creates a journal entry for every event indicated by the sync mechanism. The journal entry may include path information for the event (such as an identification of the mailbox, a date and time of the event, and so on) and event information (such as the type of event). Further details regarding a log file are discussed with respect to
Referring to
In step 230, the system queries the log file to extract information. In some cases, the system may transfer the log file information to a local table, such as a SQL database, and query the SQL database to extract information. For example, the system may query the SQL database to determine what changes have occurred from a first time to a second, later time.
In step 240, the system receives results of the query, such as an identification of all changes that occurred within the mailbox between a first time and a second time. For each change, the system may indicate a path to the change, and a type of the change, as shown in data structure 300.
In step 250, the system performs a data storage operation associated with the identified changes within the mailbox. For example, the system may transmit the extracted path information 310 and corresponding type information 320 of a received message (an identified change) to the copy component 112, which may then instruct other data storage components to create or update a secondary copy that includes the contents of the received message, as discussed herein.
In some examples, the system updates an index of content associated with a data store, such as a mailbox, based on identifying changes to the mailbox as described herein. Once the system identifies changes to a mailbox, the system may then index the content of the messages, and then update an index associated with the mailbox.
In some cases, the content indexing system 130 may update a content index according to an indexing policy. An indexing policy is a data structure that stores information about the parameters of an indexing operation. For example, an organization may copy changes to a mail server on a daily basis, and may create an indexing policy that specifies that the index is updated on a daily basis, even if backup operations are not performed daily.
The content indexed by the content indexing system 130 may be some or all content associated with an email message. Some example content to be indexed includes sender information, recipient information, subject information, message type (such as a sent or received message), text within the body of the message, attachment information (such as name or size of the attachment, or content within the attachment), and other metadata associated within the message.
Referring to
In step 420, the content indexing system accesses the messages identified by the path and type information, and indexes the content of the messages. For example, the content indexing system extracts data associated with the sender, recipient, and subject line for all received messages within the change journal. Further details regarding the indexing of content may be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/694,869, filed on Mar. 30, 2007, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OFFLINE INDEXING OF CONTENT AND CLASSIFYING STORED DATA,” which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In step 430, the content indexing system updates the index to include the indexed content. For example, the content indexing system creates entries to an index associated with the mailbox for all received messages, modifies entries to the index for all moved messages, and deletes entries to the index for all deleted messages. Thus, the content indexing system 130 may leverage the change journal to update an index associated with a mailbox. The content index may then facilitate content specific presentations of mail messages to users, to be discussed herein.
In some examples, the system updates an index for a data store to include a classification of data associated with changes to a mailbox. The index may describe certain pertinent aspects of the mailbox that allow a user or system process to consult the index to obtain information regarding the mailbox. For example, the data classification system 120 may traverse messages identified by the change journal and obtain certain characteristics and other attributes of data within the mailbox. Such an index may be a collection of metadata and/or other information regarding the mailbox, and may be referred to herein as a “metabase.” Generally, metadata refers to data or information about data, and may include, for example, data relating to storage operations or storage management, such as data locations, storage management components associated with data, storage devices used in performing storage operations, index data, data application type, or other data.
With this arrangement, if it is desired to obtain information regarding the mailbox or characteristics of messages within the mailbox, a system administrator or system process may simply consult the metabase for such information rather than iteratively access and analyze each data item in the network. This may significantly reduce the amount of time required to obtain message information by substantially eliminating the need to obtain information from the source message. Such a data classification system may associate previously stored messages with newly received or modified messages in a mailbox via the data classification index. For example, the index may associate messages based on various classifications, such as message owners (individuals or groups), content of the messages, resources used to create the messages, aging information, and so on.
Referring to
In step 470, the data classification system accesses the messages identified by the path and type information, and classifies data within the messages. For example, the data classification system may traverse the identified messages to obtain certain information regarding the messages such as any available metadata. Such metadata may include information about messages or characteristics associated with data within the messages such as the data owner (e.g., the client or user that generates the data or other data manager), the last modified time (e.g., the time of the most recent modification), the data size (e.g., number of bytes of data), information about the data content (e.g., the application that generated the data, the user that generated the data, etc.), to/from information (e.g., an email sender, recipient or individual or group on an email distribution list), creation date (e.g., the date on which the data was created), file type (e.g., format or application type), last accessed time (e.g., the time the data was most recently accessed or viewed), application type (e.g., the application which generated the data), location/network (e.g., a current, past or future location of the data and network pathways to/from the data), frequency of change (e.g., a period in which the data is modified), business unit (e.g., a group or department that generates, manages or is otherwise associated with the data), and aging information (e.g., a schedule, which may include a time period, in which the data is migrated to secondary or long term storage), and so on. Further details regarding the indexing of content may be found in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/564,119, filed on Nov. 28, 2006, entitled SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLASSIFYING AND TRANSFERRING INFORMATION IN A STORAGE NETWORK, which is incorporated by reference in its entirety.
In step 480, the data classification system updates the index to include the classification information, such as the information described above. Thus, the data classification system 120 may leverage the change journal to update an index associated with a mailbox. The data classification index may then facilitate content specific presentations of mail messages to users, to be discussed herein.
In some examples, the system facilitates the presentation of messages within a mailbox based on the content of a change to the mailbox. For example, the system may present messages along with a received message that contain content similar to the content within the received message.
Referring to
In step 520, the system identifies content within the change to the mailbox. The system may look to a content index or classification index (or may first index or classify the message) to determine content associated with the message. For example, the system may identify information within the subject line of a message.
In step 530, the system associates other messages within the mailbox with the change to the mailbox. For example, the system may look to an index of content, identify the other messages within the mailbox that contain a subject line similar to the subject line for a newly received message, and associate the other messages to the newly received message. Further details regarding the association of messages will be described below.
In step 540, the system updates the presentation of the mailbox based on the associated messages. For example, the system may present the associated messages along with the newly received message, may provide a link or other indication that identifies the associated messages, may sort an inbox or other folder within the mailbox to order messages based on the content of the new message or the associated messages, and so on.
For example,
In this example, the system presents the newly received message 652 along with messages determined to be associated with the newly received message, based on the content of the newly received message. The system leverages the event sync system and change journal discussed herein to determine that the mailbox has received a new message and to index the content of the new message without requiring access to all the messages within the mailbox. The system can then associate messages with the newly received message via the index of content and present these messages along with the newly received message.
Thus, unlike typical systems that can only sort messages based on a limited number of fields, the system described herein is capable of providing a user with numerous advantages when a change to a mailbox occurs. In the above example, the system provides a user with previous messages that may relate to a newly received message, providing contextual and historical information for the newly received message. Even though the associated messages have different subject lines, they have similar content within the subject lines (or within other fields of the messages), and the system, via a content index, can associate the messages based on the similar content. This enables the system to display messages to a user that may be similar in content but are otherwise unassociated (that is, they are not part of an email string, they do not contain the exact same subject line, and so on) when a new message is received at the mailbox.
In some examples, the system may display an indication that there are messages associated with a newly received message. For example, after creating a change journal for changes to a mailbox, the system may display an indicator 670 proximate to a newly received message 652, indicating to a user that other messages stored within the mailbox include similar content. This can be helpful when a user receives a message related to a subject long after any previous correspondence was received for that subject. The user may wish to quickly determine the importance of the message, but may not wish to view all the associated messages. The indicator 670 may link to or expand the view to include the associated messages.
In some cases, a user may access a mailbox via a mobile device that presents messages pushed to the mobile device via an enterprise server. Due to the limited display space on mobile devices, the user may wish to only receive and/or view certain messages on his/her mobile device, or may wish to retrieve certain messages that are stored within the user's mailbox, but have been deleted from the user's mobile device.
Other example processes facilitated by the system may include the following:
Upon deletion of an email message from a user's mobile device, the system identifies the change to the mailbox and identifies other email messages associated with the deleted email message, and deletes the associated messages. In some cases, the system may request authorization from the user before deleting the messages.
When a user moves a message to a different folder (such as a folder for a specific project), the system identifies the change to the mailbox and identifies other email messages associated with the moved email messages, and moves the other email messages to the folder.
Upon receiving a new message, the system may display all messages associated with the new message, and may create a new folder for the group of messages when requested by a user. These messages may be from different folders (inbox, sent messages, deleted messages, other folders). The system may facilitate building a historical context for a received message, and then storing the messages (or additional copies of the messages or portions of the messages) within a specific folder. This may enable a user to build a quick history of a certain subject when a new email message is received in order to provide the user with information that may assist the user in responding to the message, among other benefits.
In addition, the system may generate reports based on information extracted from the change journal. For example, the system may generate reports for a given time period of changes, the content within the changes and so on. The reports may identify changes associated with messages having similar data classifications, changes associated with messages having similar content, and so on. Components within the system may leverage information with the reports to update or modify storage operations, periodically or dynamically.
From the foregoing, it will be appreciated that specific embodiments of the system have been described herein for purposes of illustration, but that various modifications may be made without deviating from the spirit and scope of the system. Accordingly, the system is not limited except as by the appended claims.
Unless the context clearly requires otherwise, throughout the description and the claims, the words “comprise,” “comprising,” and the like are to be construed in an inclusive sense, as opposed to an exclusive or exhaustive sense; that is to say, in the sense of “including, but not limited to.” The word “coupled”, as generally used herein, refers to two or more elements that may be either directly connected, or connected by way of one or more intermediate elements. Additionally, the words “herein,” “above,” “below,” and words of similar import, when used in this application, shall refer to this application as a whole and not to any particular portions of this application. Where the context permits, words hi the above Detailed Description using the singular or plural number may also include the plural or singular number respectively. The word “or” in reference to a list of two or more items, that word covers all of the following interpretations of the word: any of the items in the list, all of the items in the list, and any combination of the items in the list.
The above detailed description of embodiments of the system is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the system to the precise form disclosed above. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the system are described above for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the system, as those skilled hi the relevant art will recognize. For example, while processes or blocks are presented hi a given order, alternative embodiments may perform routines having steps, or employ systems having blocks, in a different order, and some processes or blocks may be deleted, moved, added, subdivided, combined, and/or modified. Each of these processes or blocks may be implemented in a variety of different ways. Also, while processes or blocks are at times shown as being performed in series, these processes or blocks may instead be performed in parallel, or may be performed at different times.
The teachings of the system provided herein can be applied to other systems, not necessarily the system described above. The elements and acts of the various embodiments described above can be combined to provide further embodiments.
These and other changes can be made to the system in light of the above Detailed Description. While the above description details certain embodiments of the system and describes the best mode contemplated, no matter how detailed the above appears in text, the system can be practiced in many ways. Details of the system may vary considerably in implementation details, while still being encompassed by the system disclosed herein. As noted above, particular terminology used when describing certain features or aspects of the system should not be taken to imply that the terminology is being redefined herein to be restricted to any specific characteristics, features, or aspects of the system with which that terminology is associated. In general, the terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the system to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification, unless the above Detailed Description section explicitly defines such terms. Accordingly, the actual scope of the system encompasses not only the disclosed embodiments, but also all equivalent ways of practicing or implementing the system under the claims.
While certain aspects of the system are presented below in certain claim forms, the inventors contemplate the various aspects of the system in any number of claim forms. For example, while only one aspect of the system is recited as embodied in a computer-readable medium, other aspects may likewise be embodied in a computer-readable medium. Accordingly, the inventors reserve the right to add additional claims after filing the application to pursue such additional claim forms for other aspects of the system.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/360,036, filed on Nov. 23, 2016, entitled METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DISPLAYING SIMILAR EMAIL MESSAGES BASED ON MESSAGE CONTENTS, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,967,338, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/759,283, filed on Feb. 5, 2013, entitled METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR DISPLAYING SIMILAR EMAIL MESSAGES BASED ON MESSAGE CONTENTS, now, U.S. Pat. No. 9,509,652, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/548,953, filed on Aug. 27, 2009, entitled METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LEVERAGING IDENTIFIED CHANGES TO A MAIL SERVER, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,370,442, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/093,148, filed on Aug. 29, 2008, entitled METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR LEVERAGING IDENTIFIED CHANGES TO A MAIL SERVER, each of which are incorporated by reference in their entireties. This application is related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/694,869, filed on Mar. 30, 2007 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,882,077), entitled METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR OFFLINE INDEXING OF CONTENT AND CLASSIFYING STORED DATA, and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/564,119, filed on Nov. 28, 2006 (now U.S. Pat. No. 7,668,884), entitled SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR CLASSIFYING AND TRANSFERRING INFORMATION IN A STORAGE NETWORK, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4686620 | Ng | Aug 1987 | A |
4995035 | Cole et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5005122 | Griffin et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5093912 | Dong et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5133065 | Cheffetz et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5193154 | Kitajima et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5212772 | Masters | May 1993 | A |
5226157 | Nakano et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239647 | Anglin et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241668 | Eastridge et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5241670 | Eastridge et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5276860 | Fortier et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5276867 | Kenley et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5287500 | Stoppani, Jr. | Feb 1994 | A |
5321816 | Rogan et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5333315 | Saether et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5347653 | Flynn et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5410700 | Fecteau et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5448724 | Hayashi et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5491810 | Allen | Feb 1996 | A |
5495607 | Pisello et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5504873 | Martin et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5519865 | Kondo | May 1996 | A |
5544345 | Carpenter et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5544347 | Yanai et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5559957 | Balk | Sep 1996 | A |
5590318 | Zbikowski et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5619644 | Crockett et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5623679 | Rivette et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5638509 | Dunphy et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5673381 | Huai et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5699361 | Ding et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5729743 | Squibb | Mar 1998 | A |
5737747 | Vishlitzky | Apr 1998 | A |
5751997 | Kullick et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758359 | Saxon | May 1998 | A |
5761677 | Senator et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5764972 | Crouse et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5778395 | Whiting et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5812398 | Nielsen | Sep 1998 | A |
5813009 | Johnson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5813017 | Morris | Sep 1998 | A |
5829046 | Tzelnic | Oct 1998 | A |
5832510 | Ito | Nov 1998 | A |
5875478 | Blumenau | Feb 1999 | A |
5887134 | Ebrahim | Mar 1999 | A |
5892917 | Myerson | Apr 1999 | A |
5901327 | Ofek | May 1999 | A |
5907621 | Bachman | May 1999 | A |
5918232 | Pouschine et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924102 | Perks | Jul 1999 | A |
5950205 | Aviani, Jr. | Sep 1999 | A |
5953721 | Doi | Sep 1999 | A |
5974563 | Beeler, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
6006225 | Bowman | Dec 1999 | A |
6021415 | Cannon et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6023710 | Steiner | Feb 2000 | A |
6026414 | Anglin | Feb 2000 | A |
6052735 | Ulrich et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061692 | Thomas | May 2000 | A |
6076148 | Kedem et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6088697 | Crockett | Jul 2000 | A |
6092062 | Lohman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6094416 | Ying | Jul 2000 | A |
6112221 | Bender | Aug 2000 | A |
6131095 | Low et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131190 | Sidwell | Oct 2000 | A |
6148412 | Cannon et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154787 | Urevig et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154852 | Amundson | Nov 2000 | A |
6161111 | Mutalik et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167402 | Yeager | Dec 2000 | A |
6175829 | Li | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6189001 | McGovern | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6212512 | Barney et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6260069 | Anglin | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269431 | Dunham | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275953 | Vahalia et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6301592 | Aoyama et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324581 | Xu et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328766 | Long | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330570 | Crighton et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6330642 | Carteau | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6343324 | Hubis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
RE37601 | Eastridge et al. | Mar 2002 | E |
6356801 | Goodman et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6374336 | Peters | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389432 | Pothapragada et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418478 | Ignatius | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421683 | Lamburt | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421711 | Blumenau et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421779 | Kuroda | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6430575 | Dourish | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6438586 | Hass | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6487561 | Ofek et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487644 | Huebsch | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6499026 | Rivette et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6507852 | Dempsey | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6516314 | Birkler | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519679 | Devireddy et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6538669 | Lagueux, Jr. et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542909 | Tamer | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6542972 | Ignatius | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6549957 | Hanson | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6564228 | O'Connor | May 2003 | B1 |
6581143 | Gagne | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6625623 | Midgley | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6647396 | Parnell | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658436 | Oshinsky | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6658526 | Nguyen et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6732124 | Koseki | May 2004 | B1 |
6760721 | Chasen et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6763351 | Subramaniam | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6772164 | Reinhardt | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6775790 | Reuter | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785864 | Te et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6829635 | Townshend | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6834329 | Sasaki et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6836779 | Poulin | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6847984 | Midgley | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6857053 | Bolik | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6871163 | Hiller | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6886020 | Zahavl | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6947935 | Horvitz | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6983322 | Tripp | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996616 | Leighton | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7003519 | Biettron | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7035880 | Crescenti | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7047236 | Conroy | May 2006 | B2 |
7085787 | Beier | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7103740 | Colgrove | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7130860 | Pachet | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7130970 | Devassy | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7146566 | Hohensee | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7149750 | Chadwick | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7165082 | DeVos | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7167895 | Connelly | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7171619 | Bianco | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7181444 | Porter | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194454 | Hansen | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7197502 | Feinsmith | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7200726 | Gole | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7240100 | Wein | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7246207 | Kottomtharayil | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246211 | Beloussov | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7266546 | Son | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7269612 | Devarakonda | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7272606 | Borthakur | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7328366 | Michelman | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7330997 | Odom | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7343365 | Farnham | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7343394 | Morreale et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346623 | Prahlad | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7346676 | Swildens | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7356657 | Mikami | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7356660 | Matsunami | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7359917 | Winter | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7366859 | Per et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7386663 | Cousins | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7395282 | Crescenti | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7430587 | Malone | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7433301 | Akahane | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7440966 | Adkins | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7440984 | Augenstein | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7454569 | Kavuri | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7496589 | Jain | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7500150 | Sharma | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7509316 | Greenblatt | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512601 | Cucerzan | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7512814 | Chen | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7529748 | Wen | May 2009 | B2 |
7532340 | Koppich | May 2009 | B2 |
7533103 | Brendle | May 2009 | B2 |
7533181 | Dawson | May 2009 | B2 |
7533230 | Glover et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7583861 | Hanna | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7584227 | Gokhale | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7590997 | Diaz Perez | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7613728 | Png | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7613752 | Prahlad | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7617541 | Plotkin | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7620710 | Kottomtharayil | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7624443 | Kramer | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7627598 | Burke | Dec 2009 | B1 |
7627617 | Kavuri | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7631151 | Prahlad | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7634478 | Yang | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7657550 | Prahlad | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7660800 | Prahlad | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7660807 | Prahlad | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668798 | Scanlon | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7668884 | Prahlad | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7672962 | Arrouye | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7693856 | Arrouye | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7707178 | Prahlad | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7711700 | Prahlad | May 2010 | B2 |
7716171 | Kryger | May 2010 | B2 |
7716191 | Blumenau | May 2010 | B2 |
7720801 | Chen | May 2010 | B2 |
7725605 | Palmeri | May 2010 | B2 |
7725671 | Prahlad | May 2010 | B2 |
7734593 | Prahlad | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734669 | Kottomtharayil | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7734715 | Hyakutake | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7747579 | Prahlad | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756837 | Williams | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761567 | Haverkos | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7801864 | Prahlad | Sep 2010 | B2 |
7809687 | Cisler | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818215 | King | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7822749 | Prahlad | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7831553 | Prahlad | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831622 | Prahlad | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7831795 | Prahlad | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840537 | Gokhale | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7840619 | Horn | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7841011 | Manson et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7849059 | Prahlad | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7882077 | Gokhale | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7882098 | Prahlad | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890467 | Watanabe | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7890469 | Maionchi | Feb 2011 | B1 |
7925856 | Greene | Apr 2011 | B1 |
7933920 | Kojima | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7937365 | Prahlad | May 2011 | B2 |
7937393 | Prahlad | May 2011 | B2 |
7962709 | Agrawal | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7966495 | Ackerman | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8010769 | Prahlad | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8028026 | Jain | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8037031 | Gokhale | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8041677 | Sumner et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8051045 | Vogler | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8051095 | Prahlad | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8055650 | Scanlon | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8055745 | Atluri | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8086569 | Jasrasaria | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8108429 | Sim-Tang | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8117196 | Jones et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8140630 | Jones et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8140786 | Bunte | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8141152 | Hwang | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8170995 | Prahlad | May 2012 | B2 |
8190571 | Sen | May 2012 | B2 |
8219524 | Gokhale | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8229904 | Claudatos | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8229954 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8234249 | Prahlad et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8271548 | Prahlad | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8285964 | Prahlad et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8339232 | Lotfi et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8612714 | Prahlad | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8370442 | Ahn | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8401996 | Muller | Mar 2013 | B2 |
8442983 | Pawar | May 2013 | B2 |
8484257 | Borthakur et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8495102 | Fulton | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8578120 | Attarde | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8595633 | Celik | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8615523 | Prahlad | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8645349 | Roark et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8655914 | Prahlad | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8719264 | Varadharajan | May 2014 | B2 |
8738663 | Gonzalez | May 2014 | B2 |
8832406 | Prahlad et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8880735 | Tosey | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9215194 | Shaffer | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9509652 | Ahn et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9636529 | Prahlad et al. | May 2017 | B1 |
9699129 | Nelken | Jul 2017 | B1 |
9967338 | Ahn | May 2018 | B2 |
20010047365 | Yonaitis | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020049626 | Mathias | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020069324 | Gerasimov | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020087550 | Carlyle | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020118974 | Ikeda | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020147734 | Shoup et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161753 | Inaba | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030018807 | Larsson | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030046313 | Leung | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055828 | Koch | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030101183 | Kabra et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030130993 | Mendelevitch | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030149739 | Adams et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030182583 | Turco | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040015514 | Melton | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040254919 | Giuseppini | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260678 | Verbowski | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010588 | Zalewski | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050033845 | Perepa et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050050075 | Okamoto | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050055352 | White | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050086231 | Moore | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050166082 | Williams et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050187937 | Kawabe | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188248 | O'Brien | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050216453 | Sasaki | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050221802 | Hosono | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228794 | Navas | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060015524 | Gardiner et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060047714 | Anderson | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060101285 | Chen et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060173870 | Erdmenger | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060224846 | Amarendran | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060230164 | Schlimmer | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060248055 | Haslam et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259468 | Brooks | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259527 | Devarakonda | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277154 | Lunt et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070033191 | Hornkvist | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043715 | Kaushik | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070043956 | ElFar | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067304 | Ives | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070143559 | Yagawa | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070174273 | Jones et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070185926 | Prahlad | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203938 | Prahlad | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070206205 | Suzuki | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070208780 | Anglin | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070282680 | Davis et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070282953 | Jain | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080059495 | Kiessig | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080071727 | Nair | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080077594 | Ota | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080183662 | Reed | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080228771 | Prahlad | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090106375 | Carmel et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090172333 | Marcu et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090228464 | Jones et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090287665 | Prahlad | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090319534 | Gokhale | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100082672 | Kottomtharayil | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100179941 | Agrawal | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205150 | Prahlad | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110010352 | Jockisch | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110178986 | Prahlad | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120215745 | Prahlad | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130110790 | Matsumoto et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130246485 | Pawar | Sep 2013 | A1 |
20140229444 | Varadharajan et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140379815 | Cudak | Dec 2014 | A1 |
20160034506 | Prahlad | Feb 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0259912 | Mar 1988 | EP |
0405926 | Jan 1991 | EP |
0467546 | Jan 1992 | EP |
0774715 | May 1997 | EP |
0809184 | Nov 1997 | EP |
0899662 | Mar 1999 | EP |
0981090 | Feb 2000 | EP |
1174795 | Jan 2002 | EP |
WO9412944 | Jun 1994 | WO |
WO9513580 | May 1995 | WO |
WO9912098 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO9914692 | Mar 1999 | WO |
WO0106368 | Jan 2001 | WO |
WO0193537 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO3060774 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO2004010375 | Jun 2004 | WO |
WO2004063863 | Mar 2005 | WO |
WO2005055093 | Jun 2005 | WO |
WO2007062254 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2007062429 | May 2007 | WO |
WO2008049023 | Apr 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Text Figures”, retrieved from http://www.microsoft.com/msj/1198.ntfs/ntfstextfigs.htm on Nov. 10, 2005, 7 pages. |
“Titus Labs—Announces Document Classification for Microsoft Word” Nov. 3, 2005 (Nov. 3, 2005), XP55034835, available at http://web.archive.org/web/20051126093136/http://www.titus-labs.com/about/DocClassRelease.html, 1 page. |
Armstead et al., “Implementation of a Campwide Distributed Mass Storage Service: The Dream vs. Reality,” IEEE, Sep. 11-14, 1995, pp. 190-199. |
Arneson, “Mass Storage Archiving in Network Environments,” Digest of Papers, Ninth IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems, Oct. 31, 1988-Nov. 3, 1988, pp. 45-50, Monterey, CA. |
Arneson, David A., “Development of Omniserver,” Control Data Corporation, Tenth IEEE Symposium on Mass Storage Systems, May 1990, ‘Crisis in Mass Storage’ Digest of Papers, pp. 88-93, Monterey, CA. |
Bhagwan, R. et al. “Total Recall: System Support for Automated Availability Management,” Proceedings of the 1st Conference on Symposium on Networked Systems Design and Implementation, vol. 1, Mar. 3, 2004, XP055057350, Berkeley, CA, 14 pages. |
Bowman et al. “Harvest: A Scalable, Customizable Discovery and Access System,” Department of Computer Science, University of Colorado—Boulder, Revised Mar. 1995, 29 pages. |
Cabrera et al., “ADSM: A Multi-Platform, Scalable, Backup and Archive Mass Storage System,” Digest of Papers, Compcon '95, Proceedings of the 40th IEEE Computer Society International Conference, Mar. 5, 1995-Mar. 9, 1995, pp. 420-427, San Francisco, CA. |
Eitel, “Backup and Storage Management in Distributed Heterogeneous Environments,” IEEE, Jun. 12-16, 1994, pp. 124-126. |
EMC Corporation, “Today's Choices for Business Continuity,” 2004, 12 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 06846386.8, dated Dec. 30, 2008, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 07844364.5, dated Apr. 19, 2011, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. 07855337.7, dated Dec. 9, 2010, 6 pages. |
Extended European Search Report for European Application No. EP11003795, dated Nov. 21, 2012, 20 pages. |
Farley, M., “Storage Network Fundamentals,, Network Backup: The Foundation of Storage Management, Data Management,” Storage Networking Fundamentals: an Introduction to Storage Devices, Subsystems, Applications, Management, and Filing [File] Systems, Cisco Press, Jan. 1, 2005, 9 pages. |
Further Examiner's Report for Canadian Application No. 2,837,984, dated Feb. 29, 2016, 10 pages. |
Further Examiner's Report for Canadian Application No. 2,837,984, dated Feb. 27, 2017, 2 pages. |
Further Examiner's Report for Canadian Application No. 2,837,984, dated Sep. 12, 2017, 4 pages. |
Gait, J., “The Optical File Cabinet: A Random-Access File System for Write-Once Optical Disks,” IEEE Computer, vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 11-22 (Jun. 1988). |
Harrison, CDIA Training & Test Preparation Guide 2000, Specialized Solutions, 3 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US07/81681, dated Oct. 20, 2008, 11 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US07/81681, dated Nov. 13, 2009, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Application No. PCT/US10/62069, dated Mar. 7, 2011, 7 pages. |
Jander, M., “Launching Storage-Area Net,” Data Communications, US, McGraw Hill, NY, vol. 27, No. 4 (Mar. 21, 1998), pp. 64-72. |
Jeffrey Cooperstein and Jeffrey Richter, “Keeping an Eye on Your NTFS Drives, Part II: Building a Change Journal Application,” Microsoft Systems Journal, Oct. 1999, 14 pages. |
Jeffrey Cooperstein and Jeffrey Richter, “Keeping an Eye on Your NTFS Drives: the Windows 2000 Change Journal Explained,” Microsoft Systems Journal, Sep. 1999, 17 pages. |
Jeffrey Richter and Luis Felipe Cabrera, “A File System for the 21st Century: Previewing the Windows NT 5.0 File System,” and attached text figures, Microsoft Systems Journal, Nov. 1998, 24 pages. |
Karl Langdon and John Merryman, “Data Classification: Getting Started,” Storage Magazine, Jul. 2005, 3 pages. |
Manber et al., “WebGlimpse—Combining Browsing and Searching,” 1997 Usenix Technical Conference, Jan. 1997, 12 pages. |
Microsoft Developer Network, “GetFileAttributes,” online library article, [accessed on Nov. 10, 2005], 3 pages. |
Microsoft Developer Network, [GetFileAttributesEx,] online library article, [accessed on Nov. 10, 2005], 2 pages. |
Microsoft Developer Network, “Win32_File_Attribute_Data,” online library article, [accessed on Nov. 10, 2005], 3 pages. |
O'Neill, B., “New Tools to Classify Data,” Storage Magazine, Aug. 2005, 4 pages. |
Partial International Search Results, dated May 25, 2007, International Application No. PCT/US2006/045556, 2 pages. |
Quick Reference Guide for West and East [date unknown, but verified as of Sep. 13, 2007], Search and Information Resource Administration, 2 pages. |
Rosenblum et al., “The Design and Implementation of a Log-Structured File System,” Operating Systems Review SIGOPS, vol. 25, No. 5, New York, US, pp. 1-15 (May 1991). |
Supplementary European Search Report for European Application No. EP07844364, dated Apr. 19, 2011, 9 pages. |
Titus Labs Inc.: Titus LABS Document Classification V1.1 for Microsoft Word—Document Policy Enforcement, available at: <http://web.archive.org/web/20060104112621/www.titus-labs.com/includes/PDF/DocClassDataSheet.pdf>, Nov. 3, 2005, 2 pages. |
User's Manual for the Examiners Automated Search Tool (EAST) Jul. 22, 1999, Version 1.0, 179 pages. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/976,770 for Jalil, filed May 10, 2018. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180255136 A1 | Sep 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61093148 | Aug 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12548953 | Aug 2009 | US |
Child | 13759283 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15360036 | Nov 2016 | US |
Child | 15973430 | US | |
Parent | 13759283 | Feb 2013 | US |
Child | 15360036 | US |