The described technology relates generally to a computer system for displaying art and, more particularly, to a system that displays electronic images in a distributed environment.
Prior to the electronic imaging of art, each artwork could only be displayed at one location. If a copy of the artwork was made, then those copies could be displayed at additional locations. With the advent of electronic imaging of art, electronic images could be displayed at multiple locations using multiple computer displays, in addition, the artwork that is displayed at a computer display can be changed automatically at periodic intervals for one artwork to the next. A play list of images can be defined. The computer system that processes the play list displays each image in sequence at periodic intervals. In environments such as museums, a central computer system may control the displaying of a play list at various display devices throughout the museum. The central computer system may maintain a database of the images, and the museum administrator can define play lists and can specify on which display devices are the images of the play lists to be displayed. Such techniques for displaying art may be acceptable for museums, but may be unacceptable in other environments. The techniques may be acceptable in a museum because only the administrator from a central location defines the play lists and specifies the display devices at which the play lists are to be displayed and because each image that can possibly be displayed needs to be stored at the central computer system before it is assigned to a play list.
In other environments, such as a large house or an office building, it may be desirable to allow users to control the display of images from input devices throughout the environment. In addition, it would be desirable if the images that can be assigned to a play list were not limited to those currently stored at the computer system. Finally, it would be desirable if an image is automatically made available for inclusion in play lists when the computer system detects that the image satisfies user-specified criteria and that the bitmap for the image is now accessible and can be downloaded to the computer system.
An art distribution system for distributing art to multiple display devices within an environment is provided. The art distribution system provides a technique for specifying images to be displayed in an environment. The art distribution system provides a hierarchical representation of spaces within the environment. Each space may be further subdivided into subspaces. The art distribution system allows a user to select a space within the hierarchy and then to select an image that is to be displayed at the display devices within the selected space. The art distribution system then displays the selected image within the space including within all subspaces of the selected space. The art distribution system may allow a subsequent assignment of the image to a subspace to override within that subspace the previous selection of an image for the space. The image to be displayed may be part of a play list of images.
The art distribution system also provides for the downloading of images in a background mode from a remote image storage device. The art distribution system provides an image administration module that allows a user to identify images that are to be included in a play list. The image administration module then sends the identity of those images to an art server. Upon receiving the identity of those images, the art server determines whether the bitmaps for those images have already been stored at the art server. If a bitmap for an image has not already been stored, then the art distribution system requests that the image be downloaded from an image storage device to the art server.
The art distribution system also allows a user to specify that image information for accessible images that match specified criteria should be downloaded when those images become accessible. The art distribution system periodically transmits the criteria to image storage devices. The image storage devices identify those images that satisfy the criteria and then provides those identifications to the art distribution system. The art distribution system stores information describing those images so that a user can subsequently select those images to be included in a play list. The bitmap for an image can then be retrieved after the image is assigned to a play list.
The art distribution system also allows for a user to specify the play list that is to be displayed on a display device from a user control point device that may be located in the same room as the display device. The art distribution system provides a user interface at a user control point device to which a user can specify the play list for a certain space. In this way, the users can control the play list assignments from distributed locations.
A method and system for distributing images throughout an environment is provided. The art distribution system allows a user to specify play lists of images and to specify display devices at which the images of the play lists are to be displayed. The art distribution system maintains a database of the images that are specified in the play lists. The environment in which the art distribution system displays images is hierarchically organized into spaces and subspaces. For example, if the environment is a large house, then the spaces may be the east wing and west wing of the house, the subspaces of the east wing may be the bedrooms and the kitchen, and the subspaces of the bedrooms may be the master bedroom, the guest bedroom, and so on. Each space within the hierarchy may have one or more display devices within it. For example, the master bedroom may have several display devices that are capable of displaying art images. The art distribution system allows a user to specify that a play list is to be displayed at any level in the hierarchy. For example, a user may specify that a certain play list is to be displayed throughout the east wing of the house, and the art distribution system will display that play list at every display device within the east wing. If a user then specifies that a subspace of the east wing, such as the master bedroom, is to display another play list, then the art distribution system will display that other play list at all display devices within the master bedroom. The art distribution system will, however, continue to display the original display list within the other spaces of the east wing. The art distribution system may also include a non-override mode in which the specifying of a play list for a space will not override a play list that has the specifically specified for a subspace. For example, if a new play list is specified for the east wing, that play list will be display throughout the east wing except within the master bedroom because the master bedroom was specifically assigned a master play list.
The art distribution system allows a user from within any space to control the play list that is currently being displayed within that space. Each space may have a user control point devices, such as a touch panel display, within it. A user can specify a play list to be displayed within the space using the user control point device. Thus, the art distribution system can be controlled from distributed locations rather than from only a central location. The display devices may also display image information in response to a user request. For example, if the display device is a touch panel display, then when a user touches the panel, the art distribution system displays information relating to the image currently being displayed. The information may include the name of the artist, the country of the artist, and the year in which the art was generated.
The art distribution system may also allow for images to be retrieved in a background mode and allow information on images to be retrieved as the images become accessible. The art distribution system provides a user interface through which a user can define, delete, and modify play lists. The art distribution system may display the names of the images, information relating to the image, and possibly even a thumbnail representation of the images to assist the user in defining a play list. If the art distribution system does not already have an electronic copy (e.g., a bitmap) of the full-sized image, then the art distribution system queues a request to download the image. A download module of the art distribution system is responsible for retrieving a copy of the image in a background mode and storing it in the image database of the art distribution system. In addition, a user can define criteria for images of interest. For example, the user may specify an interest in images of a certain artist. As new images of that artists become accessible, the art distribution system automatically retrieves information relating to those new images. In this way, a user can be made aware of certain classes of images as they become electronically accessible to the art distribution system. The art distribution system can retrieve information.
In one embodiment, the art distribution system provides an accounting package that monitors the display of images and provides an accounting to the providers of the images. The accounting package may base the accounting for an image on how long the image has been stored at the art distribution system, the total time the image has been displayed, how many times the image has been displayed and so on. The accounting package keeps track of these statistics so that the providers can be paid accordingly. The accounting package may have a provider table that specifies how the accounting is to be performed for each provider and provides other provider-specific information, such as payment method, payment history, and so on. The image information associated with each image may include cost information and licensing restrictions related to that image. A user of the art distribution system may decide to include images in a play list based on the cost of the image. The query mechanism of the art distribution system may also take cost into consideration. For example, a query may have a maximum cost associated with it. Any image with a cost greater than that maximum cost would not satisfy the query. Alternatively, if an image would otherwise satisfy the query, the query mechanism may notify the user that an image that satisfies the query is accessible, but that its cost is more than the maximum cost. Upon receiving the notification, the user can then specify whether the image should be downloaded. To minimize the cost of images and reduce the storage space that is required, the art distribution system may automatically delete images when they are no longer included in a play list. Alternatively, the art distribution system may delay the automatic deletion for a certain period of time to allow the adding of the image to another play list without having to re-download the image.
Although specific embodiments of, and examples for, the describe technology are presented for illustrative purposes, is not intended that the invention be limited to these embodiments. Equivalent methods, structures, processes, steps, and other modifications within the spirit of the invention are within the scope of the invention. For example, one skilled in the art will appreciate that the mass storage device may be a single storage device or multiple storage devices the may be provided by different vendors of images. Also, an image storage device may be provided with queries that then asynchronously notifies the art distribution system when images that satisfy the query become accessible. In this way, the art distribution system conceptually has “agents” working on its behalf. In one embodiment, the image storage device may be local to the art distribution system or some images may be stored in a local image storage device and others may be stored in a remote image storage device. The images may also be stored in formats other then a bitmap format. For example, the images may be stored using vector graphics. In one embodiment, the spatial hierarchy may not be related to the hierarchical arrangement of physical spaces in the environment. For example, the spatial hierarchy may group all bedrooms together even though the bedrooms may not be adjacent spaces. The art distribution system may also allow for multiple hierarchies to be defined to represent the spaces in the environment. A user can select the hierarchy of interest when assigning play lists. An art distribution system may be implemented using the techniques and facilities described in U.S. patent applications entitled “Method and System for Tracking Software Components.” Accordingly, the invention is not limited to the specific embodiments, but instead the scope invention is specified by the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/710,461 filed Feb. 22, 2007, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/691,723 filed Oct. 22, 2003, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,196,678, issued on Mar. 27, 2007, which is a divisional of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/322,207 filed May 28, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,670,934, issued on Dec. 30, 2003, which claims the benefit of U.S. provisional application Ser. No. 60/118,668 filed Feb. 3, 1999. The contents of each of the above-referenced U.S. patent applications are herein incorporated by reference in their entireties. This application is also related to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/322,455, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRACKING SOFTWARE COMPONENTS,” filed on May 28, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,721,898, issued on Apr. 13, 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/322,962, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR TRACKING CLIENTS,” filed on May 28, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,684,246, issued on Jan. 27, 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/322,643, entitled “AUDIO VISUAL ARCHITECTURE,” filed on May 28, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,039,943, issued on May 2, 2006; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/322,459, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR CONTROLLING ENVIRONMENTAL CONDITIONS,” filed on May 28, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,466,234, issued on Oct. 15, 2002; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/322,965, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR IMPLEMENTING VIRTUAL FUNCTIONS OF AN INTERFACE,” filed on May 28, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,704,924, issued on Mar. 9, 2004; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/322,964, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR GENERATING A USER INTERFACE FOR DISTRIBUTED DEVICES,” filed May 28, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,617,453, issued on Nov. 10, 2009; U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/322,852, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR MANAGING SOFTWARE COMPONENTS,” filed on May 28, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,993,771, issued on Jan. 11, 2006; and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/322,457, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR PROPERTY NOTIFICATION,” filed on May 28, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,970,925, issued on Nov. 29, 2005, the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4072825 | McLay et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4742345 | Di Santo et al. | May 1988 | A |
5165465 | Kenet | Nov 1992 | A |
5295062 | Fukushima | Mar 1994 | A |
5310349 | Daniels et al. | May 1994 | A |
5315703 | Matheny et al. | May 1994 | A |
5390138 | Milne et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5390328 | Frey et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5522077 | Cuthbert et al. | May 1996 | A |
5524272 | Podowski et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537541 | Wibecan | Jul 1996 | A |
5550816 | Hardwick et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5601436 | Sudman et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5611059 | Benton et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5621662 | Humphries et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5675390 | Schindler et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5696486 | Poliquin et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5708834 | Sasaki et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5724588 | Hill et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731844 | Rauch et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5742517 | Van Den Bosch | Apr 1998 | A |
5796945 | Tarabella | Aug 1998 | A |
5799041 | Szkopek et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5805118 | Mishra et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805763 | Lawler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5859885 | Rusnica et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864387 | Reed et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867223 | Schindler et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5883621 | Iwamura | Mar 1999 | A |
5896138 | Riley | Apr 1999 | A |
5945993 | Fleischmann | Aug 1999 | A |
5950207 | Mortimore et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5970468 | Bull | Oct 1999 | A |
5990886 | Serdy et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6018619 | Allard et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6021438 | Duvvoori et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6098116 | Nixon et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6105055 | Pizano et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108661 | Caron et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6111586 | Ikeda et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6118450 | Proehl et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6122627 | Carey et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6125363 | Buzzeo et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6141010 | Hoyle | Oct 2000 | A |
6167469 | Safai et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6177931 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6178457 | Pitchford et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6195591 | Nixon et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6199195 | Goodwin et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6205126 | Moon | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219046 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6226690 | Banda et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6269362 | Broder et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6301557 | Miller et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331865 | Sachs et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336101 | Dean et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6363393 | Ribitzky | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6442573 | Schiller et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6466234 | Pyle et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6466663 | Ravenscroft et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473791 | Al-Ghosein et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6670934 | Muoio et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684246 | Hasha | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6704924 | Hasha | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6721898 | Hasha | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6725460 | Nishiyama et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6734879 | Hasha et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6784925 | Tomat et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6850978 | Springmeyer et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6886155 | Hasha | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6970925 | Springmeyer et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6975308 | Bitetto et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
6993771 | Hasha et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7010749 | Hasha et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7039943 | Hasha | May 2006 | B1 |
7155679 | Bandaru et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7159147 | Hasha | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7196678 | Muoio et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7270219 | Amo et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7287074 | Springmeyer et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7383533 | Hasha | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7529978 | Hasha | May 2009 | B2 |
7617453 | Hasha et al. | Nov 2009 | B1 |
7620957 | Hasha et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
20020026349 | Reilly et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020180697 | Freiberger et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030063601 | Niida et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030074672 | Daniels | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030185545 | Young et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050088333 | Allport | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050204389 | Proehl et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050278747 | Barton et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060114727 | Hasha | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060218479 | Torres | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20110145755 | Bacus et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0735469 | Oct 1996 | EP |
0816968 | Jan 1998 | EP |
0854607 | Jul 1998 | EP |
0 889636 | Jan 1999 | EP |
WO 9205657 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO 9411810 | May 1994 | WO |
WO 9531872 | Nov 1995 | WO |
WO 9600946 | Jan 1996 | WO |
WO 9731451 | Aug 1997 | WO |
WO 9849618 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9850838 | Nov 1998 | WO |
WO 9904342 | Jan 1999 | WO |
WO 9954663 | Oct 1999 | WO |
WO 0029960 | May 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Customizing the Lan Netview Fix Action Table”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, US, IBM Corp., Apr. 1994, 37(4B), 3 pages. |
“Nifty Ways you Can Soup Up Your Machine,” Heather Newman Free Press Staff, downloaded 2009. |
An et al., “A Multimedia Distance Learning Trail Using ISDN BRI,” AT&T Technical Journal, Jan./Feb. 1993, 15-21. |
Ansell et al., “An architecture for the design of TMN applications”, International Conference on Communications, Geneva , Switzerland, May 23-26, 1993, 1635-1639. |
Attiya et al., “Sequential Consistency Versus Linearizability”, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems, US, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, May 1994, 12(2), 91-122. |
Auer et al., “Das informationsmodell: ein konzept fur das management offener kommunikationssysteme”, Frequenz, 1993, 47(1-2). |
Bisdikian et al., “MultiMedia Digital Conferencing: A Web-Enabled Multimedia Teleconferencing System,” IBM, Mar. 1998, 421(2), 281-298. |
Breslau et al., “Dynamic Object Temporary Stop/Disappearance Notification/Permission”, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Dec. 1995, 38(12), 2 pages. |
Bushby, “Bacnet: A Standard Communication Infrastructure for Intelligent Buildings”, Published in Automation in Construction, 1997, 6(5-6), 529-540. |
Corr, C., “Gates Buys Electronic Rights to Artworks—Seattle Art Museum Images Will be Shown at His $5 Million Home,” Seattle Times Company, 1991, pp. 1-3. |
Courtney, “Phantom: An Interpreted Language for Distributed Programming”, Department of Computer Science, 1995, 19 pages. |
Davoli et al., “A Testbed for the Evaluation of an Interactive Multimedia Distance Learning Service,” IEEE, Jun. 18, 1995, 1488-1493. |
DeWire, D.T., “Thin Clients: Delivering Information Over the Web,” Michael Sprague ed., McGraw-Hill, New York, New York, U.S.A., 1998, Chaps. 15-16, pp. 235-264. |
Erickson, J., “The House That Microsoft Built Billionaire Bill's Estate Will be an Electronic Showcase for Art,” The Seattle P-I, May 10, 1991, p. D1, (printout) pp. 1-3. |
Friesen et al., “Dave: A Plug-and-Play Model for Distributed Multimedia Application Development”, IEEE, Parallel & Distributed Technology: Systems & Applications, 3(2), 1995, 22-28. |
Garcia-Molina et al., “Ordered and Reliable Multicast Communication”, ACM Transactions on Computer Systems (TOCS), US, Association for Computing Machinery, New York, Aug. 1991, 9(3), 242-271. |
Gates III, W.H., “The Road Ahead,” Viking, New York, New York, U.S.A., 1995, p. 216-227. |
International Business Machine Corporation, “SOMobjects Developer Toolkit. Users Guide. An Introductory Guide to the System Object Model and Its Accompanying Frameworks Version 2.1”, Oct. 1994, 24 pages. |
Kenna, K., “$81 million home built for a king—of cyberspace,” Toronto Star, 1997, 3 pages. |
Lunn, J., “Virtual Reality,” Sunday Herald Sun, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia, Jan. 1, 1998, p. 14. |
Maly et al., “A New Paradigm for Distance Learning: Interactive Remote Instruction,” Old Dominion University, Aug. 28, 1994, 682-689. |
Nielsen, S., “Technology Doesn't Make Room for Random Moonings,” Bell & Howell Information and Learning Company, 1998, pp. 1-2. |
Object Management Group, “The Common Object Request Broker: Architecture and Specification. Revision 2.0”, Corba Specification, Jul. 1995. |
Patterson et al., “Notification Servers for Synchronous Groupware”, Proceedings of the 1996 ACM conference on Computer supported cooperative work, 1996, 122-129. |
Santini et al., “The Virtual Museum: an Integrated Text and Image Database,” IEEE Second Workshop, Dec. 7-9, 1998, 253-258. |
Schapeler et al., “Model based maintenance for MANs”, 1225 Electrical Communication, 1993, 268-277. |
Schmidt et al., “Configuring Function-based Communication Protocols for Multimedia Applications,” University of California, Irvine, Jun. 1996, 1-14. |
Schmiederer, E., “All Power Proceeds from the Picture,” Ars Electronica Linz GmbH, Dec. 5, 2008, pp. 1-6. |
Shklar et al, “MetaMagic: Generating Virtual Web Sites through Data Modeling”, Apr. 7-11, 1997, 1-14. |
Sony et al., “The HAVI specification: Specification of the Home Audio/Video Interoperability (HAVI) Architecture: version 1.0 beta”, HAVI Organization, San Ramon, CA, US, May 15, 2001, 1-499. |
Stevenson et al., “Client-Server in Multi-Server Operating Systems: The Mach-US Approach”, Sep. 1994, 18 pages. |
Swank et al., “Web Database: Developers Guide with Visual Basic 5”, Sams.net, Apr. 1997, 5 pages. |
Templin, N., “Choice Hotels International Bets Guests Will Go for Wired PCs,” The Wall Street Journal, New York, New York, U.S.A., Jul. 26, 1999. |
Wallace, J., “The House Big Money Will Buy if You Were the Richest Person in the World What Kind of Home Would You Build? Here's What Bill Gates Did.” Seattle P-I, 1997, p. D1, (printout) 3 pages. |
Wegner, “Frameworks for Compound Active Documents (Draft)”, Oct. 20, 1997, 1-15. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130332517 A1 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60118668 | Feb 1999 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09322207 | May 1999 | US |
Child | 10691723 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11710461 | Feb 2007 | US |
Child | 13965011 | US | |
Parent | 10691723 | Oct 2003 | US |
Child | 11710461 | US |