The present invention relates to the field of electrolyser cells and more particularly, to efficiency determination for individual cells in an electrolyser.
An electrolyser is an apparatus where an electrolysis reaction takes place. Electrolysis is the process of decomposing a chemical compound into its elements or producing a new compound by the action of an electrical current. An electrolyser cell is typically composed of two electrodes and a separator, and multiple cells are used to achieve a desired electrolysis process.
A significant reduction in cell current efficiency may be caused by damages to the cell membrane. These damages commonly result from holes caused by voids, blisters and delamination due to faults in startup and shutdown procedures, electrolyte contaminants, or as a consequence of the normal aging process. These damages will, in the end, affect the cell through shortcomings such as significant back-migration of sodium hydroxide in the anode compartment and consequently affect the quality of the produced chlorine (oxygen evolution), and increase the risk of shortcuts between the anode and the cathode, thereby causing structural damages to the cell. Corrosion of the anode due to the imbalanced pressure between the anodic and the cathodic compartment may be another possible shortcoming.
Known methods of measuring electrolyser efficiency involve chemical analysis on a global basis. However, such methods do not allow identification of an individual cell's efficiency. Therefore, there is a need to determine efficiency on a cell-by-cell basis.
In accordance with a first broad aspect, there is provided a method for determining single cell current efficiency in an electrolyser, the method comprising: measuring voltage of a plurality of single cells in the electrolyser; measuring electrolyser current feeding the single cells; detecting one of a shutdown period and a start-up period; and for each single cell: determining a time t taken for a voltage level to reach a predetermined occurrence in a voltage curve after a polarization current has been triggered; and calculating cell current efficiency as a function of the time t.
In accordance with a second broad aspect, there is provided a system for determining single cell current efficiency in an electrolyser, the system comprising: a processor in a computer system; a memory accessible by the processor; and at least one application coupled to the processor and configured for: measuring voltage of a plurality of single cells in the electrolyser; measuring electrolyser current feeding the single cells; detecting one of a shutdown period and a start-up period; and for each single cell: determining a time t taken for a voltage level to reach a predetermined occurrence in a voltage curve after a polarization current has been triggered; and calculating cell current efficiency as a function of the time t.
In accordance with a third broad aspect, there is provided a software product embodied on a computer readable medium and comprising instructions for determining single cell current efficiency in an electrolyser, comprising: a measuring module for receiving voltage and current measurements of a plurality of single cells in the electrolyser; a detection module coupled to the measuring module for detecting one of a shutdown period and a start-up period; and a calculation module receiving input from the measuring module and the detection module and adapted for determining a time t taken for a voltage level to reach a predetermined occurrence in a voltage curve after a polarization current has been triggered, and for calculating cell current efficiency as a function of the time t.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in combination with the appended drawings, in which:
It will be noted that throughout the appended drawings, like features are identified by like reference numerals.
In the Chlor-alkali industry, primary products of electrolysis are Chlorine, Hydrogen, and Sodium Hydroxide solution (commonly called “caustic soda” or simply “caustic”). Three main electrolysis processes are used in the Chlor-Alkali industry based on the type of separator: ion exchange membrane, permeable diaphragm and cathode mercury. The ion exchange membrane technology has been shown to result in lower power consumption and the absence of an environmental impact compared to the mercury plants. In the Chlorate industry, Sodium Chlorate or Sodium Hypochlorite is produced from the electrochemically generated chlorine and caustic soda with no separator in the electrolysis cell.
The electrolysis process of aqueous solutions of sodium chloride for producing chlorine and caustic hydroxide is described by the following equation:
2NaCl+2H2O→Cl2+H2+2NaOH
On an industrial scale, electrolysers may be operated in two configurations: bipolar or monopolar. Bipolar membrane electrolysers are composed of a number of cells connected in series, as illustrated in
Alternatively, the monopolar electrolysers comprise a row of separate elementary cells where all the anodes are connected to a common positive pole and the cathodes to a common negative pole.
Depending on the chemical plant requirements, the number of cells can vary significantly, such as between 1 and 200 cells per electrolyser. The chemical potential required for the reaction to take place is generally around 2 to 4 V DC, so the total potential of an electrolyser from end to end can nominally reach 800 V DC. The current required for the process depends on the surface of the electrodes and the desired production rate. Generally, electrolysers may be operated between 2 and 7 kA/m2. The electrodes may be coated with catalysts, to reduce the specific power consumption. The anodes may consist of a titanium substrate with noble metal oxides. The cathodes may consist of a nickel substrate with noble metal oxides. A typical industrial elementary electrolytic cell has an electrode surface between 0.5 and 5 square meters.
The energy consumption in kWh to produce one ton of product results from the following:
Wherein
n: Number of Faraday's required per molecular weight of the product (2 for chlorine)
F: Faraday constant
UCell: Cell Voltage
CE: Current Efficiency
M: Molecular weight of the product in kg.
The current efficiency CE at least partly depends on the type of membrane. Typically, CE values for a bi-layer membrane range from 95% to 97% efficiency. The typical energy consumption of an electrolysis plant is 2100 to 2500 kWh per ton of chlorine using membrane cells. As can be seen from the above equation, a reduction in the current efficiency increases the energy consumption.
The next step in the method consists in detecting either a shut down or a startup of the electrolyser 404. A shutdown period occurs when a load is removed substantially to 0%.
A polarization current is triggered when the load reaches 0%.
Once the shutdown or startup period has been detected, individual cell efficiency may be determined using two steps. In a first step, the time t taken for the voltage level to reach a predetermined occurrence in the voltage curve after the trigger point 802 is determined 406. Cell efficiency CE may then be calculated as a function of the time t 408, CE=f(t).
In case of a shutdown, cells that take longer to reach the predetermined occurrence are found to have higher efficiency than cells that reach the predetermined occurrence in a shorter time frame. Therefore, in the example illustrated in
In one embodiment, CE versus t formula f is calculated using an empirical model derived from a nonlinear regression of values provided by a numerical simulation, while taking into account a plurality of electrolyser characteristics. These characteristics may be, for example, polarization current level, anode compartment volume, membrane area, full load level, brine flow rate, brine acidity, brine redox potential, caustic strength, voltage, and pH.
In some cases, the presence of stray current in certain types of electrolysers, due to their design, may cause a loss of efficiency. In these case, the calculation used to determine cell efficiency may be modified to consider a specific polarization current for each individual cell.
In one embodiment, the formula used has the form of CE=P1+P2*log(P3*t)+P4*tP5, P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5 are regression parameters. For example, using the following exemplary regression parameters:
and using the exemplary measured times of t806=5 minutes, t808=15 minutes, t810=40 minutes, we can find the following CE values: CE806=94%, CE808=97.9, CE810=99.
Measured times may vary between less than 5 minutes and more than 40 minutes. Using the above regression parameters, a time of less than 10 minutes results in an efficiency below 94% and a time of greater than 10 minutes results in a CE above 94%.
The cells may be categorized into two categories, namely efficient and not efficient, based on a user-defined acceptable threshold for efficiency. Alternatively, the cells may be categorized into more than two categories, such as three categories (efficient, under-performing, faulty), four categories (efficient, slightly under-performing, very under-performing, and faulty), or more.
In one embodiment, the predetermined occurrence on the curve, illustrated as 804 in
In one embodiment of the method, cell efficiency is displayed 410. An exemplary embodiment for this is illustrated in
The memory 504 accessible by the processor 506 receives and stores data, such as measured voltages, measured currents, measured times, cell efficiencies, and any other information used by the system 501. The memory 504 may be a main memory, such as a high speed Random Access Memory (RAM), or an auxiliary storage unit, such as a hard disk, a floppy disk, or a magnetic tape drive. The memory may be any other type of memory, such as a Read-Only Memory (ROM), or optical storage media such as a videodisc and a compact disc.
The processor 506 may access the memory 504 to retrieve data. The processor 506 may be any device that can perform operations on data. Examples are a central processing unit (CPU), a front-end processor, a microprocessor, a graphics processing unit (GPU/VPU), a physics processing unit (PPU), a digital signal processor, and a network processor. The application 508 is coupled to the processor 506 and configured to perform various tasks as explained below in more detail. An output may be transmitted to a display device 510.
The measuring module 602 is coupled to a detection module 604 that can detect, using the measured currents and voltages, a startup or a shutdown period of the electrolyser, upon which a polarization current is triggered. Both the measuring module 602 and the detection module 604 are coupled to a calculation module 606, which is adapted to determine, for each electrolyser cell individually, a time t taken for a voltage level to reach a predetermined occurrence in a voltage curve after polarization current has been triggered. This time t is then used to calculate cell efficiency, as per the embodiments described above.
In one embodiment, the calculation module uses an empirical model derived from a nonlinear regression of values provided by a numerical simulation taking into account a plurality of electrolyser characteristics to calculate cell efficiency versus time formula.
In another embodiment, the calculation uses an equation of the form: CE=P1+P2*log(P3*t)+P4*tP5, where P1, P2, P3, P4, and P5 are regression parameters.
It should be understood that the modules illustrated in
The embodiments of the invention described above are intended to be exemplary only. The scope of the invention is therefore intended to be limited solely by the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims priority under 35 USC 119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application bearing Ser. No. 61/169,743 filed on Apr. 16, 2009, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2010/000595 | 4/16/2010 | WO | 00 | 1/19/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2010/118533 | 10/21/2010 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20060289312 | Tremblay et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
Tremblay, G.J.; “Intelligent Systems & the Chlor Alkali Industry: Realizing Maximum Efficiencies”, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, technical presentation at CloroSur 2007 annual meeting, Oct. 16, 2007. |
Cammarota et al.; “The Calculation of Cathode Current Efficienty and Metal Loss in a Small Alumina Reduction Cell”, College Park Metallurgy Research Center, US Departmentg of the Interior, College Park, Maryland, vol. 117, No. 2, Feb. 1970, pp. 282-288. |
Jaksic, M.M.; “Mutual Effect of Current Density, pH, Temperature, and Hydrodynamic Factors on Current Efficiency in the Chlorate Cell Process”, Electrochemisty Department, Institute for Chemistry, Technology and Metallurgy, Belgrade, Yugoslavie, vol. 121, No. 1, Jan. 1974, pp. 70-79. |
Iwai et al.; “Numerical Prediction of System Efficiency of Solid Oxide Redox Flow Battery During Charge Discharge Process”, The Electrochemical Society, ECS Transactions, vol. 57, No. 1, pp. 2661-2670, 2013. |
Tremblay et al.; “Electrode Management Optimisation System”, Modern Chlor-Alkali Technology, 2001, Society of Chemical Industry, vol. 8, pp. 105-113. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120138483 A1 | Jun 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61169743 | Apr 2009 | US |