Patent Grant
7236860
1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to railroads generally, and more particularly to a method and system for ensuring that a train does not pass a device such as a grade crossing gate or a track switch when that device is not properly configured.
2. Discussion of the Background
Train safety has always been a concern in the railroad industry. If anything, this concern has increased in recent years. This concern has led to proposals for and development of automated, safety-enhancing systems such as Automatic Train Control (ATC), Positive Train Control (PTC), and others. While such systems vary in their implementation, one goal they all share is to avoid accidents.
One source of accidents is an improperly set switch. Historically, an engineer or conductor would visually verify that a switch has been set to the correct position. However, engineers and conductors, being human, sometimes make mistakes, including traveling too fast such that there is not sufficient time to stop the train when the signal is first visible, not activating the brakes a sufficient distance from the switch, failing to notice that the switch has been improperly set, and even forgetting to look at the switch. The results of such mistakes can be disastrous.
Another source of accidents is a malfunctioning grade crossing gate. Grade crossing gates may be triggered by radar, by a track circuit, or by a mechanical switch set at a position far enough away from the crossing gate such that the gate will have sufficient time to go down when triggered by a train traveling at the maximum allowable speed. Some gates are equipped with monitoring equipment that can determine if the gate is malfunctioning and, in some cases, sends a message via telephone or radio informing the dispatcher of a malfunction. The dispatcher is then required to broadcast this information to all other trains that pass the grade crossing.
What is needed is a method and apparatus that ensures that a train will not pass a switch, grade crossing gate, or other device that is not properly configured.
The present invention meets the aforementioned need to a great extent by providing a computerized train control system in which a control module determines a position of a train using a positioning system such as a global positioning system (GPS), consults a database to determine when the train is approaching a configurable device such as a switch or grade crossing gate, continuously interrogates the device to determine its status as the train approaches the device, and forces an engineer/conductor to acknowledge any detected malfunction. A malfunction can be reported by the device itself, or can be declared by the system if the device fails to respond to initial or subsequent interrogations. In some embodiments of the invention, the train is forced to come to a complete stop before proceeding past the device. In other embodiments, the train will slow to a speed that will allow the engineer/conductor to visually determine whether it is safe to proceed past the device if the engineer/conductor acknowledges a message warning of the malfunction and will stop the train if the engineer/conductor fails to acknowledge the warning message.
A more complete appreciation of the invention and many of the attendant features and advantages thereof will be readily obtained as the same become better understood by reference to the following detailed description when considered in connection with the accompanying drawings, wherein:
a and 3b are a flow chart of a device interrogation method according to a third embodiment of the invention.
The present invention will be discussed with reference to preferred embodiments of train control systems. Specific details, such as specific algorithms and hardware, are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. The preferred embodiments discussed herein should not be understood to limit the invention. Furthermore, for ease of understanding, certain method steps are delineated as separate steps; however, these steps should not be construed as necessarily distinct nor order dependent in their performance.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate identical or corresponding parts throughout the several views,
A positioning system 120 is connected to the control module 110. The positioning system supplies the position (and, in some cases, the speed) of the train to the control module 110. The positioning can be of any type, including a global positioning system (GPS), a differential GPS, an inertial navigation system (INS), or a Loran system. Such positioning systems are well known in the art and will not be discussed in further detail herein. (As used herein, the term “positioning system” refers to the portion of a positioning system that is commonly located on a mobile vehicle, which may or may not comprise the entire system. Thus, for example, in connection with a global positioning system, the term “positioning system” as used herein refers to a GPS receiver and does not include the satellites that transmit information to the GPS receiver.)
A map database 130 is also connected to the control module 110. The map database 130 preferably comprises a non-volatile memory such as a hard disk, flash memory, CD-ROM or other storage device, on which map data is stored. Other types of memory, including volatile memory, may also be used. The map data preferably includes positions of all configurable devices such as switches and grade crossing gates. The map data preferably also includes information concerning the direction and grade of the track in the railway. By using train position information obtained from the positioning system 120 as an index into the map database 140, the control module 110 can determine its position relative to configurable devices.
When the control module 110 determines that a configurable device 180 (which includes a transceiver 190) is present, it interrogates the device 180 through transceiver 150. The transceiver 150 can be configured for any type of communication, including communicating through rails and wireless. In addition to communicating with configurable devices 180, the transceiver 150 may communicate with a dispatcher (not shown in
Also connected to the control module 110 is a brake interface 160. The brake interface 160 monitors the train brakes and allows the control module 110 to activate and control the brakes to stop or slow the train when necessary.
A warning device 170 is also connected to the control module 110. The warning device 170 is used to warn the conductor/engineer that a malfunction has been detected. The warning device 170 may also be used to allow the engineer/conductor to acknowledge the warning. In some embodiments, the warning device 170 is in the form of button on an operator display such as the display illustrated in co-pending U.S. application Ser. No. 10/186,426, entitled “Train Control System and Method of Controlling a Train or Trains” filed Jul. 2, 2002, the contents of which are hereby incorporated by reference herein. In other embodiments, the warning device 170 may be a stand alone button that illuminates when a malfunction is detected. In yet other embodiments (e.g., those in which no acknowledgment of a warning is required), the warning device 170 may comprise or consist of a horn or other device capable of providing an audible warning.
In some embodiments, this threshold distance is predetermined distance based in part upon a worst case assumption (i.e., an assumption that a train having the greatest possible weight is traveling at a maximum allowable or possible speed in a downhill direction on a portion of track with the steepest grade in the system). In other embodiments, the threshold is based on the actual speed and weight of the train and the grade of the track between the train and the device. In still other embodiments, the calculation may take into account the distribution of weight in the train this will effect the required stopping distance as discussed in the aforementioned co-pending U.S. patent application.
In some embodiments, the interrogation includes an identification number associated with the device 180. Since only the device corresponding to the identification number will respond to the interrogation, this identification number is obtained from the map database 130. This avoids contention between multiple devices attempting to respond to the interrogation on the same frequency.
If the configurable device 180 fails to respond at step 218, or reports an incorrect configuration at step 220, the control module notifies the conductor/engineer of the malfunction at step 224. If, in response to the notification, the operator fails to activate the brakes at step 226, the control module 110 automatically activates the brakes to bring the train to a halt at step 228. At this point, the conductor/engineer must restart the train, which preferably requires the conductor/engineer to acknowledge the warning provided at step 224.
If the device 180 responds to the interrogation at step 218 and reports a correct configuration at step 220, then, at step 222, the control module 110 returns to step 216 if the device 180 has not been passed, or returns to step 210 to repeat the process for the next configurable device 180. Returning to step 216 to interrogate the device multiple times as the train approaches the device is important for safety purposes. This will detect malfunctions or changes in configuration after the initial interrogation (e.g., someone throwing the switch into the wrong position after the initial interrogation but before the train reaches the switch) from causing and accident. Whether or not the interrogation of step 318 includes the device's identification number, it is preferable for the device's response to include its identification number as this allows for greater assurance that a response from some other source has not been mistaken as a response from the device.
a and 3b together form a flowchart 300 illustrating operation of the control unit 110 in connection with configurable devices 180 according to a second embodiment of the invention. Steps 310-322 of the flowchart 300 are similar to steps 210-222 of the flowchart 200 of
If the operator acknowledges the warning at step 332 and sufficiently slowed the train at step 334 within the allowable time period, the control module 110 monitors the speed of the train to ensure that the reduced speed is maintained at step 336 until either the train has passed the device 180 at step 338 or the conductor/engineer verifies that he has visually determined that the device is configured properly at step 340. In the case of a configurable device such as a grade crossing gate, this allows the train to continue moving past the gate at a slow speed. In the case of an incorrectly thrown switch, it is expected that the conductor/engineer will stop the train if the switch cannot be set to the correct position before the train reaches it; however, there may be some circumstances in which the conductor/engineer desires to allow the train to continue past an incorrectly thrown switch. Because the conductor/engineer was forced to acknowledge the warning about the improperly configured switch, it is unlikely that allowing the train to proceed past the improperly configured switch is not intentional. In other embodiments, a train may not be allowed to pass the switch until it has come to a complete stop, but may be allowed to pass an improperly configured grade crossing gate at a reduced speed without first coming to a complete stop.
If the conductor/engineer fails to acknowledge the warning at step 334 within the allowed time period, the control module 110 commands the brake interface to stop the train at step 342. The control module 110 then notifies the dispatcher of the stopped train at step 344.
At steps 220 and 320 above, the control module 110 determines whether the device 180 is properly configured. This determination is necessarily device dependent. For example, in the case of a switch, the determination as to whether the device is configured correctly is preferably made with respect to warrants/authorities and/or route information issued to the train. That is, the control module 110 preferably stores information as to what route the train is to take and what warrants (also sometimes referred to as authorities) have been issued for that train. In the case of a grade crossing gate, determining that the device is configured properly comprises more than determining that the gate is in the down position. Many such devices are designed such that a failure results in the gate being placed in the down position. However, in the event of such a failure, it can be expected that some cars and/or pedestrians may attempt to cross the tracks even though the gate is down. Thus, if the crossing gate reports a malfunction, it is preferably treated as if it is not properly configured despite the fact that the gates may be reported as being in the down position.
It should be understood that any and all of the aforementioned events (e.g., the acknowledgment or lack thereof of a warning from an engineer/conductor, the stopping of the train upon a detection of an improperly configured device) may be recorded by the event recorder 140. It should also be understood that, in some embodiments, some configurable devices 180 may be configured by sending commands from the train. In such embodiments, the control module 110 will send the appropriate command via the transceiver 150 on the train to the device 180 via its transceiver 190.
One advantage of those embodiments of the invention in which a configurable device is interrogated as the train approaches is that such devices are not required to transmit information when trains are not in the area. This saves power as compared to those systems in which wayside devices continuously or periodically transmit information regardless of whether a train is close enough to receive such information.
In the embodiments discussed above, the control module 110 is located on the train. It should also be noted that some or all of the functions performed by the control module 110 could be performed by a remotely located processing unit such as processing unit located at a central dispatcher. In such embodiments, information from devices on the train (e.g., the brake interface 160) is communicated to the remotely located processing unit via the transceiver 150.
Obviously, numerous modifications and variations of the present invention are possible in light of the above teachings. It is therefore to be understood that within the scope of the appended claims, the invention may be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein.
This application is a Continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/267,959, filed Oct. 10, 2002 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,996,461. The entirety of which is herein incorporated by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4181943 | Mercer, Sr. et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
| 4459668 | Inoue et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
| 4561057 | Haley, Jr. et al. | Dec 1985 | A |
| 4711418 | Aver, Jr. et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
| 5072900 | Malon | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5092544 | Petit et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
| 5129605 | Burns et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
| 5177685 | Davis et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5332180 | Peterson et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
| 5340062 | Heggestad | Aug 1994 | A |
| 5364047 | Petit et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5394333 | Kao | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5398894 | Pascoe | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5452870 | Heggestad | Sep 1995 | A |
| 5533695 | Heggestad et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
| 5620155 | Michalek | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5699986 | Welk | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5740547 | Kull et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5751569 | Metel et al. | May 1998 | A |
| 5803411 | Ackerman et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5828979 | Polivka et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
| 5867122 | Zahm et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5944768 | Ito et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5950966 | Hungate et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
| 5978718 | Kull | Nov 1999 | A |
| 5995881 | Kull | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6049745 | Douglas et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
| 6081769 | Curtis | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6102340 | Peek et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
| 6135396 | Whitfield et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6179252 | Roop et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6218961 | Gross et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6311109 | Hawthorne et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6322025 | Colbert et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6345233 | Erick | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6371416 | Hawthorne | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6373403 | Korver et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6374184 | Zahm et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6377877 | Doner | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6397147 | Whitehead | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6421587 | Diana et al. | Jul 2002 | B2 |
| 6456937 | Doner et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6459964 | Vu et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6459965 | Polivka et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6487478 | Azzaro et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
| 6609049 | Kane et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
| 20010056544 | Walker | Dec 2001 | A1 |
| 20020070879 | Gazit et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
| 20020096605 | Berry et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060080009 A1 | Apr 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 10267959 | Oct 2002 | US |
| Child | 11281559 | US |
