Patent Application
20100262661
The present disclosure relates to presence, location or other generic systems, and in particular to the context for target information required by a watcher.
Applications possess functional utilities that have important characteristics known as context. Context is defined as “the set of information which surrounds, and gives meaning to something else.” Examples of context can be found, for example, in presence applications, location applications, among others.
Current presence services provide horizontal platforms. In other words, current presence services provide the capture of presence information on behalf of presentities and watchers who tend to make use of many different presence capable services. Examples of such presence capable services include, but are not limited to, instant messaging, push-to-talk over cellular, among others.
Presence platforms generally support the notion or concept of a watcher client subscribing for a specific presentity. In other words, the watcher would subscribe to watch a particular entity or individual who makes available their status information. During the subscription process, some presence platforms also permit a watcher client to optionally narrow or specify a subset of presence information required. The watcher may also be provided with a capability to specify conditions under which a notification is sent to a watcher. Thus, for example, when utilizing an instant messaging application, when a watcher's friend becomes available and willing to chat, this could be provided as a notification to the watcher.
The present disclosure will be better understood with reference to the drawings in which:
In the present description the following terms are used and defined as follows:
The present disclosure provides a method within a computing execution environment for the establishment of a context for a watcher, the method comprising: receiving a subscription request including a service identifier; associating the service identifier with a service context for a service; and applying the service context to information returned to the watcher.
The present disclosure further provides an execution environment including an access layer or server, comprising a processor configured to: receive a subscription request including a service identifier; associate the service identifier with a service context for a service; and apply the service context to information returned to a watcher.
Current horizontal presence platforms are unable to permit a watcher or watcher grouping to associate applicable presence information with a particular service. For example, an instant messaging (IM) service may be utilized by a particular watcher and the service implies or associates specific presence contexts. For exemplary purposes, an IM service called “MyFriendlyChat” is used herein. In particular, a specific set of presence information and other information relevant to the calculation of presence is used to achieve functions on behalf of the “MyFriendlyChat” service.
Current presence platforms also do not provide a way in which a watcher or watcher grouping is able to initiate a subscription relative to a given service. Current subscriptions are only permitted for a given resource such as a presentity and hence there is a need to multiply the subscription to each resource within a given service. In other words, if watcher “Alice” wishes to watch a target “Bob” for the “MyFriendlyChat” service, restrictions can be set up when “Alice” is subscribing to watch “Bob”. The restrictions will be required to be replicated when watcher “Alice” wants to watch “Beth” and for each subsequent presentity or target that watcher “Alice” wishes to watch. As will be appreciated by those in the art, PRS provides a convenience mechanism known as a Resource List Server, which allows watcher ‘Alice’ to refer to a list of ‘buddies’ (e.g. Bob and Beth as ‘mySchoolFriends’). However, while there is a savings in message volume (i.e. subscription message exchange dialogues between watcher and Presence Server) any benefit is typically impacted by a heavier processing overhead (e.g. of a resource list meta-information)
The present disclosure provides, in one embodiment, a mechanism to establish a presence context based on a watcher and associated presence capable service.
In a further embodiment, it is possible that during the establishment of a presence context, the watcher may directly or indirectly subscribe to a presentity or a group of presentities on behalf of the watcher client. Such direct or indirect subscription may eliminate a need for a watcher client to submit separate presence subscriptions for each presentity. In other words, the establishment of a presence context and the corresponding presence information subscription or subscriptions may be completed using a single watcher client protocol message.
Reference is now made to
The presence platform 100 provides the ability to capture presence state information for later distribution to authorized watcher clients 110 through a presence service 120.
In order for a watcher client 110 to establish interest in a particular presentity or a collection of presentities, the watcher client 110 is configured to issue a SUBSCRIBE method using SIP (session initiation protocol) based on the Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) request for consultation rfc3261 and rfc3265.
Referring to
The presence service 120 processes the event-notify-filter and establishes a subscription between the watcher and presentity, as shown at arrow 132. If the processing is successful then a SIP/200-OK( ) message is sent back to watcher client 110, as shown by arrow 134.
The above is illustrated with reference to the following exemplary code. In the code below, the watcher-client 110 is for a watcher “Alice” and the presentity that “Alice” wishes to monitor is “Bob”.
The presentity publishes baseline presence information towards presence service 120. This is illustrated as:
As seen from the above XML, presence and name spaces are defined and a tuple with id “a1232” provides status, willingness, service-description, contact and timestamp information.
At some point in time, watcher client 110, in this case “Alice” invokes her OMA presence version 2 enabled “MyFriendlyChat” client. This client makes a request for presence information for presentity “Bob” as seen by arrow 130. The contents of the SIP:SUBCRIBE of arrow 130 is shown below with regard to exemplary XML:
As seen from the above XML, the message sent and shown by arrow 130 of
The response received, shown by arrow 134 in
As seen in the above message, the SIP/200-OK matches with the subscription request and indicates that the subscription is established between the presentity “Bob” and watcher “Alice”.
Referring again to
The SIP:NOTIFY message of arrow 136 may have the following XML code associated with it:
The above XML illustrates that the event notification filter is applied to presence information and the resulting notify provides the status, the willingness, the contact and the timestamp for a target presentity.
In
In the embodiment of
Thus, the watcher client 110 sends a SIP:SUBSCRIBE message, as shown by arrow 150, to the presence service 120. The SIP:SUBSCRIBE message includes an ‘event-notify-filter2’, which is a modified filter.
The SIP:SUBSCRIBE message of arrow 150 of
The filter is changed by the “MyFriendlyChat” service to indicate a trigger condition if willingness changes to “open”. This is seen defined by the <trigger> which specifies that the trigger is invoked if the willingness is changed from closed to open.
In response to the message of arrow 150, the presence service 120 processes the event notification filter with the “change” directives/semantics to and establishes the subscription, as shown by arrow 152. An acknowledgment with the “SIP/200-OK( )” is sent as shown by arrow 154. The message of arrow 154 will be similar to the message provided above with reference to the message of arrow 140.
Subsequently, a change is detected for the identified presence information element. In this case, the presentity may change willingness from “closed” to “open”. In response, the presence service 120 sends a SIP:NOTIFY with an initial presence document. The initial presence document sent, as shown by arrow 160 is similar to the SIP:NOTIFY shown by arrow 136 and thus, a similar amount of information needs to be passed.
The watcher client 110 then processes the presence client delta, as shown by arrow 162, and if the processing is successful, sends a SIP/200-OK( ) shown by arrow 164. Again, the SIP/200-OK( ) message shown by arrow 164 will be similar to the message provided above with reference to the message of arrow 134.
In one embodiment, the complexity and amount of data transferred is reduced through the use of a presence access layer and the establishment of presence context for a service.
Abstraction Layers
The contextual interpretation of presence information may be embedded within each client application. Each client application can receive a different or the same set of presence metadata and in situations where multiple applicants share the same raw presence metadata, the fact that the contextual interpretation is individually tied to each of them increases the possibility that two different client applications will arrive at differing conclusions about a specific presence aspect. This may not provide the desired outcome and may lead to interoperability issues, particularly between client applications that share or treat specific presence aspects in an orthogonal and consistent manner.
For example, an email and an IM client that both derive a person's reachability from the same raw presence document may come to different conclusions as to whether someone is reachable based on subtle variations in each client application's presence processing steps. This may result in the email client concluding that the person is reachable while the IM client determines that the individual is unreachable. In addition to a bad quality of service, this could result in issues with interoperability such as not being able to spawn an IM chat session from an email client when reviewing an individual's email due to a state mismatch error. In a further example, Alice has two IM clients on her mobile device (MyFriendlyChat, and SimpleChat). Both of these are based on OMA Instant Message enabler and therefore, share the same raw presence information. However, MyFriendlyChat has a different way of computing willingness from SimpleChat. That is SimpleChat, does not take into account ‘overriding-willingness’ for the IM service tuple, and therefore the conclusions of the services regarding ‘willingness’ may not always be the same (depending on what a Presentity publishes). Thus two client applications can (and will) reach differing conclusions regarding an underlying aspect
Abstracting raw presence information into a dedicated context aware layer which supports “presence aspects” based on contextual rules and policies allows for the possibility of applications to work collaboratively to achieve derived functionality and to carry out intelligent workflows as a result of a compound context presence. For example, a project manager wishes to host a project status meeting. The project manager establishes a meeting invitation (e.g., from an enterprise email/calendaring application) on her desktop execution environment to meeting participants. A presence-context platform working on behalf of the mail/calendaring application may be able to support the following types of functions as a result of the user initiating the invite:
Further, various application servers can integrate the presence context aware mechanism (P/CAM) to gain efficiency by reducing the number of communication and processing steps. For example, a mobile advertisement server could integrate with a P/CAM to simplify and streamline its presence aspects to focus on core functionality such as the delivery of contextually relevant mobile advertisements.
Context awareness resides in whole or in part within the network and provides a composite view of presence/location or other related aspects to an application or multiple applications on behalf of various entities such as a given presentity and/or watcher in the presence case. For each case, this is achieved by associating rules, triggers, and policies against presence related aspects such as availability, contactability, reachability, state, among others, into a context aware layer. Rules or triggers may be extended or overridden to provide additional or application specific behavior to different classes of applications or enablers.
Context awareness may be replicated to a presence or location context aware mechanism connected with a presence or location service platform to provide a client application or a service with location related aspects. A location context aware mechanism (L/CAM ) makes use of location information provided by a location enabler, location information stored in a presence service or other location information store. For example, the location could be derived using GPS, base station, or extended cell tower information.
Location specific rules and policies are associated against location related aspects such as within a geographical area, who is close by, am I there yet, among others, into a location context aware layer. As with a P/CAM, rules or triggers may be extended or overridden to provide additional/application specific behavior to different classes of applications or service enablers.
Similarly, a “generic” context aware layer (context aware mechanism) could contain a combination of a P/CAM, L/CAM and specific application context aware mechanism. An example could be a mobile advertising platform where presence, location and campaign related information are used in combination to target advertisements of interest towards a user. Other generic platforms could include a network address book service, a network community service, among others.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, a context aware mechanism is applicable to both a wired and wireless execution environment and computing domain. This approach has several benefits including a dramatic reduction in the complexity of an associated application running within a user's execution environment. A contextually aware platform located on the network permits a given client application or enabler to focus on its core competency such as chat within an IM client, visualizing a person's location in a location client, among others. Functionality is achieved by injecting (e.g., at execution time) the applicable policies and by invoking specific rules and/or triggers relevant to the context of the client application or the enabler to provide utility on behalf of the user.
In a further embodiment, a context aware platform or context aware layer includes both an x/CAM server and an x/CAM client or agent that work in concert. Further, in some embodiments of the x/CAM, the same distributed or non-distributed aspects as the P/CAM and L/CAM mentioned above are possible. For instance, the context aware layer may exist only on the server side in some embodiments. The context aware layer client or agent is embedded within an execution environment. The interface to a context aware platform may be web-centric. Examples include extensible markup language (XML) web services such as simple object access protocol (SOAP), representational state transfer (REST) or XML over hypertext transfer protocol (HTTP). The above supports a context aware layer deployment scenario whereby an application or enabler could directly interact or manipulate the context aware mechanism to more closely model the appropriate behavior. For example, a mobile advertising server co-located with a P/CAM agent could be used to override presence policies to better align presence with the underlying functionality of the platform. For example, a mobile advertising server can integrate or make use of an x/CAM ‘layer’. Such x/CAM could be a superset of a P/CAM, L/CAM and specific advertisement /CAM.
Reference is now made to
In
A presence platform 230 is adapted to store raw data and state updates that have been received from clients.
Further, a PoC server 240 exists and is adapted to publish or consume state information on behalf of users.
A presence context aware mechanism server 250 provides the context aware layer and communicates with network 220 and receives policies, dynamic rules and/or triggers from clients over network 220 and further publishes and receives presence aspects through network 220.
A presence context aware mechanism server 250 further communicates with presence platform 230 to provide and receive presence information flow.
Based on the above, P/CAM server 250 receives policies, rules and triggers and is adapted to provide and receive presence aspects based on these rules and logic to clients such as devices 210 or desktop 214, or PoC server 240.
As will be appreciated, in other embodiments, various aspects or functionality of the P/CAM can be distributed throughout the network and in some instances the entire P/CAM can be placed onto other devices or clients within the network.
Reference is now made to
Specifically, user devices 310 communicate through a base station 312 with network 320. Further, a desktop 314 (e.g., a computing device that is similar or different than user devices 310) communicates over a wide area network 316 with network 320.
A presence platform 330 is adapted to store raw data and state updates that are received from clients.
Further, a PoC server 340 is adapted to communicate with network 320 and publish or consume data on behalf of client applications.
The context aware layer embodied as a P/CAM server 350 is adapted to communicate with network 320 and to receive policy, rules and thresholds and provide and receive presence aspects to and from clients such as user devices 310 and desktop 314 through P/CAM agent 360 or PoC server 340 through P/CAM agent 362.
P/CAM 350 is further adapted to communicate with presence platform 330 to receive and send presence information flow.
In the embodiment of
P/CAM agent 360 or 362 could contain rules and/or policies that are predefined. Further, the P/CAM agent 360 or 362 can be used to manipulate presence information or interoperate with metadata or clients on the host execution environment in some embodiments.
As will be appreciated, in some embodiments the entire P/CAM can be located on a client or other server.
Reference is now made to
Specifically, in
A presence platform 430 is adapted to store raw data and updates received from clients regarding presence.
A PoC server 440 is adapted to communicate with network 420 and to publish or consume state on behalf of clients.
PoC server 440 further includes P/CAM 450 embedded therein. P/CAM 450 communicates with presence platform 430 to exchange presence information flow and further communicates over network 420 to receive policy information, rules and thresholds and to further receive and publish presence aspects. Specifically, communications 452 provide P/CAM 450 with policy and dynamic overloaded rules, whereas communications 454 provide network 420 with presence aspects.
Further, an implementation could be defined as a P/CAM layer integrated within an enabler, e.g.: as part of the Presence Platform itself. The latter implementation, as illustrated in
Reference is now made to
Specifically, in
A presence platform 530 is adapted to store raw data and updates received from clients regarding presence.
A PoC server 540 is adapted to communicate with network 520 and to publish or consume state on behalf of clients.
Presence platform 530 further includes P/CAM 550 embedded therein. P/CAM 550 communicates with presence platform 530 to exchange presence information flow and further communicates over network 520 to receive policy information, rules and thresholds and to further receive and publish presence aspects. Communication 552 shows policy/dynamic overloaded rules being received from network 520. Communication 554 shows presence aspects being sent and received between presence platform 530 and network 520. Communication 556 shows presence information flow between presence platform 530 and network 520.
As will be appreciated with reference to
As will be appreciated,
With reference to
A location server 640 is further adapted to communicate with a network 620 and can provide the location of various clients.
An L/CAM 650 could be a stand alone server communicating with a network 620 and with location platform 630. In an alternative embodiment the L/CAM server can be co-located on the location server as illustrated by reference numeral 655. In further embodiments, L/CAM agents can be located on devices such as agent 660 on user devices 610 or on the location server such as agent 662. In the case that agents 660 and 662 are used, various functionalities or all of the functionality of the L/CAM can be distributed to the user devices or the location server.
In further embodiments, the L/CAM can be part of the location platform 630, as shown by L/CAM 670.
Referring to
Further, a generic x/CAM 750 is adapted to communicate with network 720 and with generic platform 730. In other embodiments, the x/CAM can be located on server 740 and this is shown as x/CAM 755.
In yet further embodiments, the x/CAM can have agents 760 or 762 that are located on user devices 710 or on server 740 respectively.
In further embodiments, the x/CAM can be part of the generic platform 730, as shown by x/CAM 770.
The above may be implemented utilizing policies and rules/triggers. A process relating to this mechanism is provided below.
In accordance with one embodiment, a context or mechanism, whether it is presence, location or generic, may include one or more of policies, aspects, rules and triggers. Each is described in detail below. The description below has been presented with reference to a presence context or mechanism. This is, however, not meant to be limiting and those skilled in the art would appreciate that the below could be equally applicable to location or generic context or mechanisms.
Policy:
Policy is associated with a particular presence context at an appropriate point in the application life cycle, to specify the behavior or treatment of presence, location or generic related aspects. Policies augment rules/logic flows in terms of how they operate, to provide a more accurate and meaningful computation of aspects on behalf of a client application or enabler. As will be appreciated, a policy can apply to a class of applications, an individual application or even to a user and can be provisioned with settings on how aspects are computed.
Policy may be expressed using the Open Mobile Alliance's (OMA) policy evaluation, enforcement and management (PEEM)/policy expression language (PEL). PEL defines a generic and extensible grammar in which policies may be expressed using a rule set language. PEL is based on Internet Engineering Task Force (IETF) request for comments (rfc) 4745. Conditions and/or actions (as specified in rfc 4745) may be enhanced within the scope of PEEM, through the OMA XDM (XML Document Management) common policy extensions, as detailed in OMA-SUP-XSD_XSD_xdm_extensions-V1—0. The policy can also be expressed on IETF rfc 4745.
As will be appreciated, PEEM is a continuing standards effort by the OMA to define common functions needed by its enablers.
As an example, the following table describes relevant presence policies for use by a presence context in the computation of presence aspects. These policies have applicability to the OMA presence platform. However, given policies may be added or removed from the given context as required and the concept is applicable to a multiplicity of presence platforms. In the table below, the default value, if applicable, is shown in italics.
ignore
IMS, SIP, <token>, . . .
unknown, worship
unknown | unsupported
ignore | active | terminated
ignore | active | terminated
Table 1 above defines various policies and values for the policies. As indicated in the table, various policies exist and the description of the policy and the values are provided.
In the first row of the table, a first policy is “opt-in-source”. The policy is used to indicate which presence element is an indicator of service opt-in. The default value indicates that opt-in is not relevant for the given communication service.
The values that are possible for the opt-in-source policy are willing, or ignore. As will be appreciated, these could be selected by various entities such as the service provider, among others. The entity choosing the policy can choose which values to utilize. Thus, for example, the service provider could choose to ignore opt-in source for the first policy.
The second policy described in Table 1 is applicable-network-type and indicates the applicable network types for a given communication service. A default, as shown, is IMS. However, other values include session initiation protocol (SIP) or a token and can be chosen by the selecting entity.
The third policy is “threshold-value-equals” and could be utilized to establish an equality comparison operation threshold named label with a qualified name XML element and value. A boolean value of one or true or yes would apply if the policy was applied in the XML name space and the resulting target matched the value.
The next policy in Table 1 is “threshold-value-less-than”. This is similar to the threshold-value-equals policy except that it utilizes the less-than comparator.
Similarly, the next policy is “threshold-value-greater-than” which is similar to the above-mentioned threshold-value policies, except with the greater-than operator.
The next policy is “unavailable-activities-set” and could include a subset of activities that would render the contact unavailable in the context of the application, service or enabler. In the default setting this is unknown, but it could include things like busy, holiday, meal, among others.
The next policy is “undef-servcaps-sub-elements” and indicates undefined service capabilities and how the application is to interpret these. For example, Table 1 indicates that if the service capability is undefined it could be considered to be unsupported.
The next policy in Table 1 is “un-def-barring-state” and indicates how to interpret the absence or omission of a barring-state XML element in presence metadata and could include that the state is active or terminated. The default is that the state will be ignored.
Similarly, an “undef-registration-state” indicates how to interpret the absence or omission of a registration-state XML element and is by default ignored but could also be active and terminated in the example of Table 1 above.
The final policy defined in Table 1 above is “undef-willingness” and indicates how to interpret the absence or omission of a willingness XML element for a given communications service and could include a pair consisting of a state (open, or closed) along with a validity period (either an indefinite period or a preset validity period).
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, Table 1 above is merely meant as an example and other policies are possible based on the needs of a system or user.
To support the policies in the preceding table, the P/CAM requires additional XML types and element definitions in order to extend the PEL common-policy “actions”. The following XML schema document provides further details relating to how these actions may be extended for use by a P/CAM.
The above XML schema provides for the definition of element name in the lines that begin <xs:element name=“opt-in-source” type=“OptinSourceType”/>. The element names are further defined for the remaining policies in Table 1 above.
As will be seen by those skilled in the art, the remainder of the XML Schema above defines the policy types as indicated by the description and value fields in Table 1. Specifically, for the “OptInSourceType” a xs:pattern value is set to willing or ignore. The above therefore provides the additional XML type and element definitions in order to extend PEL common policy actions.
By extending common policy actions, P/CAM policies may be incorporated into a common policy PEL ‘ruleset’ XML document. A ‘ruleset’ may apply at a user scope or a global scope. For example, the ‘ruleset’ may apply to a class of service or a specific application. The ruleset may also apply to an individual user or group of users.
P/CAM related policies are manipulated and evaluated through the various PEEM requester interfaces by the P/CAM server itself or a P/CAM enabled client/agent. That is, application or authentication protocols may provide specific metadata such as the requester identity to the PEEM requester interface along with other metadata available to the PEEM servers as the basis for applying rules.
The following is an example of a common policy PEL rule set XML document, which consists of a single rule ‘a101’. This rule associates with a service enabler such as a PoC alert and defines specific policy settings/values be applied as a result of a match for a target resource. In this case the target resource is the service identifier itself. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, this example makes an intentional correlation between the value of the common policy extension ‘ext:service[@enabler]’ attribute and the OMA PoC alert service-id as defined by OMA presence.
The above is illustrated with reference to
An AL-client device 810 communicates with a AL 812, which communicates with a PEEM 814.
AL 812 sends a loadPolicyExtension(xsd,service-id) message 820 to PEEM 814 which is processed, as shown by arrow 822. PEEM 814 then sends an accept message 824 to AL 812.
At some later point the AL-enabled client device 810 attempts to initiate and authenticate with an AL 812 service enabler such as a PoC alert service. This is done with the authenticate (watcher-id, service-id, user-id) message 830.
As part of the initiation and authentication the AL 812 sends a pellnit (watcher-id, service-id, user-id) message 840 to PEEM 814. PEEM 814 evaluates the policy as shown by arrow 842 and returns the policy in message 844. Evaluation 842 allows the PEEM to apply a specific set of policy settings on a per server or per user basis.
AL 812 initiates the context arrow 844 and further optionally returns the AL context as message 850 back to AL client device 810. Additionally, AL 812 may resolve a policy via the PEEM (based on who the user is and the service), However, it is ultimately the AL 812 that establishes context on behalf of the AL-client 810.
It is possible that, as an example, the match criteria could be the service-id relating to an OMA enabler (such as PoC alert). Other match criteria could be based on a user or a group sphere.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the above defines rule ‘a101’. In this case the service-id is defined as “org.openmobilealliance.PoC-alert” the OMA PoC Alert service, and the P/CAM policy extensions are defined as part of the XML namespace “urn:oma:xml:xdm:extensions:cam”. The above is therefore a manifestation of the schema defined with regard to Table 1 above. The context aware layer values based on rule ‘a101’ firing are shown below with reference to Table 1A.
As will be appreciated, the PEEM could utilize multiple application policies and multiple services or exclusions could be established as part of a ruleset.
The actions as seen in the XML above define specific policy values for document scope.
Aspects:
Aspects are application level abstractions relevant to a source, for example, presence aspects are application level abstractions relevant to presence. Presence aspects can be considered the conceptual interface of a presence context to a P/CAM client application or enabler. Table 2 below outlines a base set of applicable presence aspects that may be incorporated for use by a presence context aware mechanism and exposed to client applications. For each presence aspect, a description is provided, along with the associations the aspect relates to in terms of the standard presence data model outlined in IETF rfc 4479.
In particular, to specify and apply contextually relevant behavior across a disparate set of interworking components and user devices, a general mechanism is required for the encapsulation of aspects related to a presence platform. That is, an aspect captures a first-order abstraction related to a given application or enabler. Aspects relating to a presence platform would describe or relate to underlying indications of presence. Aspects may be expanded to encapsulate other indications as well. For example, location may be incorporated (or inferred) to derive or compute an associated aspect within a presence platform. This is illustrated in Table 2 below with regard to the who-is-nearby aspect.
The present disclosure provides a mechanism for an arbitrary number of aspects as required by the presence platform. These may include common aspects such as availability and reachability. They may also include application specific aspects. A mechanism within the presence platform or management interface exists to associate an appropriate set of aspects with a given service. Association of aspects of contextual in nature and may apply at different levels. For example, a given aspect may apply to a service enabler such as all OMA push-to-talk over cellular (i.e. PoC) compliant service.
An aspect may also be applicable at a user or group level.
For each aspect, an associated set of rules or logic may be defined which outline the steps or processing required to achieve the given aspect. The logic also identifies the raw presence/data indicators/elements relevant to the calculation of the associated aspect. A given aspect may combine two or more predefined rules together as part of its logic processing. Further, underlying logic may be reused as a library or routines in support of aspects within a presence platform. This library may include aspects as other high-level modules or components which may be incorporated. This allows multiple client application types to utilize a context aware layer.
In one embodiment presence aspects are extensible. For example, if a given service or enabler requires specific functionality, the presence platform could support the extension or re-definition in one or more aspects, as required.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, Table 2 may be modified or extended to support other presence platforms or application/enabler requirements. The particular presence aspects shown in Table 2 are demonstrative of an OMA presence platform.
Table 2 defines various presence/application/service aspects applicable to a presence platform. For each aspect there is a short description along with the association or applicability of the aspect to the standard presence data model. In addition, the visibility is declared. Visibility describes the applicable point at which the associate aspect is referred to. Common visibility defines or declares the most common or relevant point at which the associated aspect is likely to be referred. Choices for visibility include over the air (OTA) versus server. As would be appreciated, “server” would surface on the network side in an application server.
In the first row of Table 2 above, the opt-in aspect is defined which indicates that the presentity is willing to participate in a given session for a given service or application. As indicated in Table 2, the person is associated with the service.
A second row of Table 2 indicates that a presence aspect is ‘available’. This aspect indicates that the presentity is available to communicate using a given service or application and again there is an association between the person and the service.
The next row in Table 2 indicates the presence aspect of contact-means. A presentity's most applicable method of contact for a given service or application is provided and the association is between the person's address and the service.
The next row of Table 2 indicates an aspect of ‘contactable’. This aspect shows whether the presentity is willing, available and has currently valid contact means for a given service or application. Again, in this case, the association is between the address of a person and the service.
The next row of the table indicates an aspect of ‘reachable’. This shows that the presentity is contactable for a given service or application. A positive indication for reachable shows that a presentity is willing, available, contactable and that their device is in coverage to establish communication over the defined service. The association is therefore between the person, service and the device.
‘Where-are-you’ is the next aspect defined in Table 2 and shows the presentity's current location. As indicated, the association for this aspect is at the person, and the person, service, and the device.
Other aspects are further defined in Table 2 and include various associations thereto.
For an OMA presence realization, an example presence platform call flow may look like that shown in
As shown in
Reference is now made to
Client device 910 sends a query concerning the presence aspect “reachable”, shown as communication 920. In one embodiment, the aspect “reachable” may also include a URI corresponding to a presentity. In turn, access layer (AL) 912 sends an HTTP/GET request 922 to OMA PRS/XDM 914.
OMA PRS/XDM 914 authenticates as shown by 930 and returns a response in the form of HTTP/1.1 <pidf> 932.
The access layer (AL) 912 then checks whether the presentity is reachable as shown by arrow 940. The processing within the AL for the aspect “reachable” invokes other rules such as “contactable”, “contact-means”, “available” and “opt-in or willing”.
The arrow shown by 940 determines that the presentity is unreachable and returns this in message 950.
As shown in
Rules/Triggers:
A third branch of the context awareness mechanism solution consists of rules and/or triggers. The example below uses presence as an example.
Rules reside within a presence context and establish a sequence of steps or logic flows required to compute presence aspects based on the metadata provided by the underlying presence platform. Rules are conceptually similar to database stored procedures or user defined functions (UDFs). Base or default presence rules may be changed or supplemented by an application client or an individual user. For example, the injection by a client of dynamic rules may override or extend base rule behavior. In addition, rules incorporate policies associated with the presence context by the application or the enabler to augment or provide hints surrounding the interpretation of metadata. This permits an application or service to directly affect the outcome of one or more presence aspects, as required.
Table 3 below shows a set of rules relating to computation of presence related aspects with pseudo-logic specific to the OMA presence platform. It should be noted that this is only a subset of the rules/logic that may be exposed by a presence context. It is possible to change the composition or granularity of rules as required by the presence context. In addition, as noted with reference to
As used in Table 3 below, ‘def’ indicates “defined” and means that the entity exists and is established with reasonable values, whereas ‘undef’ means “undefined”—the complement of ‘def’. ‘Undef’ thus has values such as nil, null, or invalid.
‘Valid’ in Table 3 below means the associated entity still contains timely or meaningful data.
Table 3 above describes a number of rules. The first rule defined is ‘findServicePresInfo’ which returns the most applicable presence information element for the given service or application within a service list. As indicated in the pseudo logic, for each tuple t in the list, a check is made to see whether the service-id of ‘t’ matches the desired service-id, and if so the tuple t is added to a list. Thereafter, once the compilation is finished, if the item size is 1 then that item is returned. Otherwise the function ‘resolveService’ is invoked. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the ‘resolveService’ function is an OMA specific function that finds the most relevant service.
Similar rules are defined with regard to the remainder to the Table 3, in which various pseudo logics are utilized to define what will be returned when a rule is implemented.
Presence rules and/or logic flows may be specified using OMA's PEEM/PEL. The following is an example of a PEEM/PEL ‘abstract process’ document which characterizes the logic flow for the ‘findServicePresInfo’ rule as shown in the pseudo-logic of Table 3 above:
The other portion of the rules/triggers branch is triggers. Triggers reside within a presence context and associate a sequence of steps (or logic flows) based on an underlying presence state change detected in the presence platform. Triggers are conceptually similar to database triggers. Triggers are, by default, initially notifications. Triggers may be defined by an application client, or an individual user as needed. For example, the injection by a client of dynamic triggers may override or extend base trigger behavior(s).
Table 4 lists a set of triggers relating to the computation of presence related aspects with pseudo-logic specific to the particular trigger. It should be noted that aspects may also be defined with a corresponding trigger definition.
The first trigger in Table 4 above indicates that the trigger will be invoked when a presentity opts in or out of a given service or application. The trigger allows specific functionality to be carried out when the associated state occurs within the context. The pseudo-logic can be defined by the application client if the client wishes the P/CAM to do something on the occurrence of a given event which is when a trigger is invoked.
The other triggers defined by Table 4 have similar functionality and are invoked pursuant to a predefined condition being met.
Triggers are specified using OMA's PEEM/PEL (Policy Expression Language) and are substantially similar (in structure and composition) to presence rules. Thus the code example used above with reference to rules could be adapted for the triggers of Table 4.
Triggers are useful in a complex presence-aware system. Triggers provide a network initiated encapsulation to be defined and applied for a given scenario. Triggers, in one embodiment, provide a simple notification to a client or service or may incorporate complex business logic that is executed completely within the network. This is helpful within a wireless domain where network bandwidth and processing resources are limited.
For example, a wireless content delivery service may require specific behavior based on the state of users and their associated device capabilities. That is, two users who have opted in for a sports ticker/alert service with different devices may receive content in different ways. For example, a first user who has a very simple text based wireless device and is only able to receive short message service (SMS) with baseball related content and/or a web-based URL pointing to additional information requires different data than a second user who has a full featured personal digital assistant/smart phone with a built in media handling capability. The second user may receive multimedia alert messages containing short full-color video clips of a sports ‘play of the day’.
Each case above illustrates the underlying complexity of a content delivery service for delivering appropriate/timely content relevant to each user's device. That is, a content delivery service typically has some understanding of a given user's current state, along with their associated interests, and the relevant device capabilities for receiving content. A content delivery service working in combination with a contextually aware presence capability is such a platform. Further, a contextually aware platform that exposes relevant “aspect triggers” on behalf of a content delivery service provides useful means for notifying or pushing relevant information to an associated subscriber base.
An aspect with an associated trigger is a “monitored aspect” on a continuous or specified basis. That is, when an entity, whether a person or a logical entity, reaches or qualifies for an associated aspect trigger, the associated trigger “fires,” and a set of logics or actions takes place. The logic is contextual in nature and allows services and/or user specific actions to be defined and executed. This may be sending or pushing relevant information to an appropriate client device. As with aspects, aspect triggers may be expanded to encapsulate a variety of non-presence indicators such as location. Further, in one embodiment triggers may be established by including in an establishment message the ‘duration’ of the monitoring. For example, the duration may be one-shot (i.e. single change detected), indefinite (until cancelled) or for a finite period of time (e.g. for the next 3 hrs).
The present systems and methods include a mechanism for an arbitrary number of aspects as required by the service/presence platform. This may include a set of common aspect triggers such as “availability”, “opt-in”, “reachable”, among others, as well as application specific triggers. A method exists in one embodiment within the presence platform or management interface for associating an appropriate set of aspect triggers with a given service. Association of aspect triggers is contextual in nature and may apply at different levels. For example, a given aspect trigger may apply to a service enabler such as OMA push-to-talk over cellular PoC compliant services. Further, the trigger may be applicable or scoped at a class of service level. For example, this may apply “availability” to all class of services. Further, a trigger may be applicable at a user or group level.
The determination of whether a client is “reachable” is simplified by abstracting the aspect to the context aware layer. Further, a trigger can invoke the aspect or the aspect can be invoked on behalf of the trigger. This could be done by the underlying service enabler without any involvement from any client device. Triggers may invoke defined aspects and/or may incorporate logic consisting of rules/procedures which include the invocation of other aspects.
Aspect triggers by default will send an appropriate notification back to an associated client. However, it is possible for a service, class-of-service, enabler, user or group to modify/define a trigger which performs actions exclusively within the network without any client involvement.
Call flow is shown below with regard to
The contents of a notification are specific to the trigger and could include items such as the address of record for one or more presentities, an aspect indicator or mask for one or more aspects of relevance, a URL, a service or application routing mask for the receiving entity to ensure the aspect is directed or associated with the appropriate observer, among others.
Each client or service receiving a notification may respond according to the associated transport protocol. Additionally, it is possible for aspect trigger indications to be durable. That is, if a trigger is calculated for a given “interested observer” but that observer is unreachable, the aspect indication may be persisted or queued until the given user is able to properly receive the associated trigger. This is useful for scenarios where a given notification may outlast a given client user session.
Referring to
As seen in
Arrow 1022 establishes the trigger. This may include overriding or extending default steps for the trigger, obtaining/evaluating data from various sources and possibly sending out notifications to one or more users.
The evaluation shown by arrow 1024 shows that when a trigger fires in response to a detected change in an associated aspect, an address of record, the changed aspect or application information is packaged and notification is sent to the client device or service. This notification is shown with arrow 1030.
In some cases a response or acknowledgement may be returned, and this is shown by arrow 1032.
As shown in
The above policies, aspects and rules/thresholds could utilize a web services business process execution language in the form of WSBPEL 2.0. WSBPEL 2.0 provides a mechanism with which to express logical sequences required to implement presence rules or triggers (either whole or in part) in a P/CAM solution. A formal language (like PEEM/PEL) for specifying logic flows and invoking primitives (through web service description language (WSDL) type bindings) provides a presence context with limitless combinations of rules and/or triggers on behalf of an application or service. It should also be noted that more complex context flows may be created and chained together (e.g. through partner links) to carry out workflows and or business logic that is presence related and contextually relevant to the connected platform. Rules are able to invoke other rules, as nested rules. Similarly, triggers may also invoke rules where applicable. In other embodiments, expressing rules could be performed utilizing a traditional programming language (e.g. Java) or diagramming tools (e.g. a Sequence, Flow-Chart, or Use-Case diagram in UML being translated to a rule(s)).
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the use of a context aware layer saves device and network resources by reducing the amount of information flowing between a mobile device and a network, and by removing processing from the mobile device.
For comparison with the present system and method, an example of information flow is shown hereafter with regard to
In response, a ‘raw presence document’ as illustrated below is returned:
The above therefore illustrates the large (in terms of number of bytes or characters) presence document that is returned by conventional systems and methods, requiring significant battery resources to receive and network resources to transmit.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the resulting ‘raw presence document’ illustrated above could also be delivered by an OMA/Presence SIP:NOTIFY request (on behalf of an authorized watcher). An XDM fetch is used to simplify the network flows for this example.
Examples of where the abstraction mechanism may be used include:
Instant Messaging Client
One exemplary client application for the use of a context aware layer is an instant messaging application. The instant messaging application is called “MyFriendlyChat” herein.
In a university setting, for example, several friends may have the “MyFriendlyChat” application loaded onto their mobile device. In this example, user Alice is a university student having finished a day of classes. She is heading towards the college restaurant and wonders whether any of her friends are nearby to join her for dinner.
Alice takes out her wireless device and starts the “MyFriendlyChat” application and invokes the “Invite-nearby-friends-to-chat” function. This function utilizes both presence and location to return a list of friends that are within a predetermined distance and have a reachable status. The “MyFriendlyChat” application returns the active buddy list showing that Bob and Jane are nearby and reachable.
Alice enters a short message on her device letting her friends know that she is going to the college restaurant. Both Bob and Jane receive the message from Alice and reply that they will join her shortly.
The above shows a client application which utilizes both presence and location in order to make determinations and return relevant information to a user. In particular, the “invite-nearby-friends-to-chat” function requires knowledge of the location of nearby friends, as well as presence information to allow the instant messaging to occur.
Under a traditional model of instant messaging, a presence platform will need to be queried to obtain a list of raw data which must then be processed by the client application. Further, in this case a location platform would also be required to be queried to find the location of individuals in a buddy list.
According to the present disclosure, the aspects can be abstracted to a context aware layer that is located within the network. The context aware layer can be part of a platform such as the location and presence platform, part of a dedicated server, part of a presence or location server, or could be distributed among these entities. In some cases an agent for the context aware layer could also exist on the wireless device or on another computer.
The functionality of the client application is placed within the context aware layer thus providing for consistent results between varied client applications and also reducing signaling required between the mobile device and network.
For the above, the “MyFriendlyChat” client application functions as both a watcher and a presence source in an OMA/PRS realization and functions as a presence source in a context aware layer realization.
The context aware layer makes use of a predefined aspect to determine whether Bob and Jane can be reached. In this case, the aspect may be “eligible-session-participant” which is defined to select one or more presentities based on a given criteria. In this case, the aspect “eligible-session-participant” is overridden for application “MyFriendlyChat” to select from a group list those “buddies” who are “willing, reachable, and nearby”. The overridden presence aspect is configured prior to the indication of any aspects from a “MyFriendlyChat” client executing on the wireless device.
With regard to call flows, the client application must determine who is willing, reachable, and nearby to initiate a message datagram to invite these “buddies” to dinner. To fulfill this functionality, it is assumed that the “MyFriendlyChat” application subscribes to members of Alice's buddy list through OMA PRS/RLS components.
The client application thereafter needs only to initiate communications towards eligible session participants based on the context aware layer result.
Various rules could be applied to the aspect to narrow it further. For example a limit could be placed on a subset of buddies when determining who is close by and reachable. Thus, the rule could be that only university buddies are returned when the request is made.
In a continuation of the above example, once Alice, Bob and Jane reach the restaurant, Alice could set an aspect trigger on her mobile device to alert her if any of her friends come within a certain distance of the restaurant within a predetermined time period. For example, Alice could set a trigger on her device to indicate that if any “buddies” come within 0.5 kilometers within the next half hour she should be alerted.
In this example, Jim meets these criteria and Alice receives a notification on her mobile device that Jim has entered the specified area and Alice can thus invite Jim to join the group.
As will be appreciated the above illustrates an example of an aspect trigger. Specifically, a trigger is established for the aspect “eligible-session-participant” and can be called, for example, “isEligibleSessionParticipant” which could cause an alert to be sent to Alice once true. As will be appreciated, such an alert could include an audible tone, vibration or any such notification to indicate to a user that the trigger conditions have been met.
Again, the use of a context aware layer facilitates a use of triggers, as well as reducing communications between the mobile device and the network, thereby saving battery life and processing power on the mobile device as well as network resources.
Mobile Advertising Scenario
In a further example of the above, car company XYZ Motor Cars wants an advertising campaign to coincide with the launch of a new sports-activity car model. XYZ Motor Cars hires Split-second Advertising Company to run the ad campaign and Split-second makes use of ABC Telecom as the wireless service/content delivery provider.
Split-second has established an advertising campaign for the new car model targeting individuals between 23 and 30 years of age with interests in biking, camping, kayaking. The ad contains various photos, video-clips or the like, of the new model being used with different sports activities.
Jack, Phyllis, Lynn and George have all agreed to receive advertising related content. Andrew is within the target market for XYZ Motors but has not opted to receive advertising content. Jack, Lynn and George are within the target market for XYZ Motors.
With the above scenario, ABC Advertising Company configures their wireless advertising platform for the advertising campaign. A trigger is established within the wireless advertising platform, where the trigger monitors individuals who meet the Split-second criteria for the given ad campaign, who have opted in to receive the advertising, are “reachable”, and have an appropriate device with capabilities of receiving an associated video clip.
ABC turns on the campaign to coincide with the launch date of the new model for XYZ, resulting in the context aware layer trigger, defined above, firing.
A short time later, Jack, Lynn and George receive messages containing information related to the new vehicle being introduced by XYZ Motors. The ad content is adapted appropriately for each device. For example, Jack could receive a WAP-Push SMS with the WAP-URL to XYZ Motor's launch site while Lynn and George both receive multi-media messages (MMS) with a short video clip attached.
Since Phyllis and Andrew did not meet the criteria for the ad campaign, they are not contacted. However, if at a future time but still during the ad campaign, Andrew opts in to receive wireless advertising messages the XYZ Motor Company ad would be sent to Andrew.
The above is implemented utilizing various aspects. The “reachable” aspect can be used to determine whether Jack, Lynn and George can be reached to send advertising messages to. An aspect such as “opt-in” can be used to determine whether the user has opted in to receive advertising.
Triggers could also be utilized. In this case, a trigger such as “isEligibleSessionParticipant” is used to return one or more users who have opted into the wireless advertising and content delivery services, are reachable and have a device with an appropriate set of media capabilities. In this case, the default action for the aspect trigger could be to direct the context aware layer to initiate content appropriate to the user. Thus, for example, no direct over-the-air indication could be sent to an advertising application on the client device.
The context aware layer could include information such as MobileAdvertisingPreferences” defining a collection of mobile advertising specific preferences stored in an appropriate XDMS. The wireless advertising client located in the device may invoke this entity to return mobile advertising related preferences.
Other information could include “ContentDeliveryPreferences” having a collection of content-delivery preferences stored in an appropriate XDMS. The wireless advertising client or other component within the device may invoke this entity to return content-delivery/service/application/device preferences.
The advertising example provides for a context aware layer utilizing two separate enablers working together. Specifically a mobile advertising and content delivery enabler are used to achieve a specific function point. Such interactions are not possible under present services.
Research has shown that data transfer savings utilizing a context aware layer are between about 40% and about 75% under certain conditions. Thus, the use of the context aware layer provides savings of network resources and battery life on the mobile device.
The context aware layer further provides for the connection of multiple and varied client applications by allowing aspects, rules, policies and triggers to be defined at the context aware layer. This provides the advantage that the context aware layer can service multiple client applications and does not need to be recreated for each specific client application.
Establishing a Presence Context for a Service:
Having regard to the above and to the amount of data required to be transferred to subscribe to and watch a target, the present disclosure utilizes a context aware layer such as the Open Mobile Alliance presence access layer (OMA PAL) and provides for the establishment of presence context on behalf of a watcher client such as a watcher client 110 from
In the present disclosure, presence context is established and applied on a service basis. As known to those skilled in the art, a per service basis may be on an application level or a base level.
Thus, utilizing the context above, the context may be refined based on:
Utilizing the “MyFriendlyChat” instant messaging service from
The presence context associates the needed presence information for the presence aware service based on the service or a class of service. It may also narrow presence context based on the watcher-id. Further, it is possible for the PAL, during presence context establishment, to also subscribe for one or a collection of presentities on behalf of the PAL client operating as a watcher.
In one embodiment, presence context also allows the service provider to control which information is used or sent back to the PAL Client. When a presence context is returned, a presence context identifier may also be provided to correlate the presence context with the service ID/watcher ID. A presence context may also be useful for a watcher client configured as a generic PAL-client agent operating on behalf of many different PAL capable applications. That is, the presence context may be used by a PAL client agent to distinguish one presence system from another within the watcher client. In other words, a single PAL-client may route appropriate aspect indications to a correct application or service on a device.
Referring to
An example of the HTTP: POST is shown below with regard to the following XML:
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the purpose of an HTTP:POST is to identify and possibly authenticate a watcher and to initiate a PAL session. The URI referenced in the POST method is analogous to a service URI. Here the context “MyFriendlyChat” is provided by the ‘path’. A PAL would typically route to this to an appropriate application context on the server hosting the platforms. In other words, in the present example it could refer to the URI for the “MyFriendlyChat” service or resource. Based on the URI the PAL 1120 knows the context for the presence information that is to be utilized by watcher client 1110. Alternatively, the resource URI may optionally be part of the message body itself, for example as “method=init¶m=‘bob@example.com’”.
Further, the HTTP:POST message of arrow 1130 indicates an accept-header of type “application/pal-caps+xml”. This mime-type indicates the type of message body a particular watcher client is able to process. The PAL establishes presence context through a presence context resolution process. For example, it is possible that, prior to the HTTP:POST message, a service provider has provisioned a PAL Profile (a service level view of presence using a PAL) for the “MyFriendlyChat” service. Once the message of arrow 1130 is received by the PAL, the PAL establishes a presence context for a given client or requester based on who that user is, the service, among other considerations. Presence context is created and determined when the request is made. That is, the presence context contains application presence aspects required for use with “MyFriendlyChat” clients, along with other metadata required to support this service. Examples of such metadata include a set of underlying rules used to process or calculate the presence aspects.
Once a base presence context has been established, as indicated above, the presence access layer may be refined, extended or overwritten through a subsequent presence context amendment phase. For example, a PAL may examine input fields within the initiation message to determine that there are amendments applicable to a presence context for a specific watcher or watcher group. For example, this is specified in the “From:” header (i.e. based on the watcher who initiated the request). The refinement or amendment could for example, additionally ‘qualify’ a presence context based on the fact that a user is a member of a special group (e.g. Alice is a member of gold-class users of MyFriendlyChat) and therefore this could change the resulting presence context that user (Alice) ultimately makes use of for the PAL session.
In one embodiment, it may be determined that a watcher is a special class of user and therefore certain rules and/or policy value instances are updated on the watcher's behalf relevant to the “MyFriendlyChat” service. This processing is shown by arrow 1132 of
In
The body of the message shown by arrow 1134 is illustrated with regard to the example XML below:
As shown in the above XML, optional payload based on what is supplied is provided in the response.
The response message above consists of a root “service” XML element which specifies the actual service identifier corresponding with the resource URI. In this case, the resource is the “MyFriendlyChat” service. The “version attribute” identifies the version such as a major or minor of the service corresponding with the service identifier. The presence context therefore refers to version 1.0 of the “MyFriendlyChat” service in the above exemplary XML.
In a further embodiment, the attribute “presence-context-ID” is established by the presence access layer service to correlate a watcher ID such as a PAL client 1110 session with a PAL for a given service ID and possibly a presentity. The presence-context-ID is incorporated within any follow-on request message or messages to a PAL by the watcher/PAL client 1110.
While the exemplary XML may be sufficient to establish a PAL enabled service, in order to clarify information which could be made available to a PAL client 1110, it is also possible to specify an optional message payload within the service XML element. Thus, the PAL client 1110 may request the information within a specific message request forwarded to the PAL 1120. This information can be useful, for example, when a watcher is a trusted service within the service provider's domain.
In one embodiment, the response message shown by arrow 1134 contains details of presence context. That is, the message body enumerates the presence aspects/triggers and policy types/values resolved or established for the given presence context. This enables a watcher to determine the granular details of a presence context previous established by a service provider. The watcher can further use these details to refine its internal functionality to make use of alternate or new requests towards the PAL. Such functionality is similar to JAVA reflection (i.e. the ability to self-inspect interfaces at runtime).
In a further embodiment, it is also possible for the PAL to respond with an ‘HTTP/1.0 401 Authorization’ status message. Such a status message is similar to what is currently carried by OMA SIMPLE presence. This would require the watcher to authenticate to the PAL such as through the use of a digital access authentication mechanism over HTTP (e.g. HTTP digest authentication).
Following any authentication or initial handshake, a watcher or watcher grouping may request one or more aspect values related to one or more presentities including a group list URI. In other words, the resource URI may relate to a buddy list for the watcher.
The request for the values may be made in a HTTP:POST message as shown by arrow 1140. Exemplary XML that may be part of the message of arrow 1140 is shown below:
In the XML above, the presentity is “Bob” and the presence context is identified as a series of XML Element values.
In response, an HTTP/200-OK message, shown by arrow 1142, is returned. Exemplary XML for the message as shown by arrow 1142 is provided below:
In the above XML, “Bob” is available. The PAL client 1110 has now updated aspect values for the given presentity “Bob” as shown by arrow 1144.
In a further embodiment, it is also possible for the PAL client 1110 to asynchronously receive trigger notifications based on detected presence watcher aspect changes in the network that is relevant to the service “MyFriendlyChat”. Thus, PAL client 1110 need only issue an initial request towards the PAL 1120 to initiate a trigger event stream.
Referring to
An exemplary message for arrow 1150 is illustrated with the XML below:
The request invokes the PAL to establish presence trigger monitoring on behalf of watcher “Alice”. “Alice” has added an optional parameter specifying a group URI to include as part of an event stream request. This is defined as “MySchoolChums”. Utilizing this mechanism, the PAL may receive an indication and narrow the set of presentities to be monitored relative to the service “MyFriendlyChat”.
At some point in the future, the PAL detects the presence aspect change related to a member of the group “MySchoolChums”. The updated aspect value is sent towards the PAL client 1110 as HTTP/206-OK message, shown by arrow 1152.
The response may be provided as the following XML:
The above XML indicates that the PAL 1120 has detected presence aspect changes for three presentities within the group URI “MySchoolChums”. These are identified as “Bob”, “James”, and “Lisa”. “Bob” and “James” have become available while “Lisa” has become unavailable in the exemplary XML above.
As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the reporting of a presence aspect trigger is specific to the presence context established in the messages shown by arrows 1130 and 1132 and a PAL client 1110 will never receive indications of triggers that are not relevant to the established presence context. For example, in the above the presence context relates directly to the service “MyFriendlyChat”.
Future changes would then be detected in this embodiment, and could be reported in an HTTP/206-OK message such as that shown by arrow 1160. The XML for arrow 1160 is similar to that of the XML for arrow 1152.
In one embodiment, the PAL call flow may further be optimized. As shown with regard to arrow 1132, it is possible to include a resource URI of a presentity or a group of presentities. This may be used to directly establish a trigger event stream, which would initiate the presence trigger monitoring process within the PAL. This would therefore eliminate one or more of the messages indicated by arrows 1134, 1142 and 1150.
Therefore, a watcher would simply receive indications as series of HTTP:POST response messages (presentities indicated by the resource URI) are detected to change applicable presence aspects for the context. The PAL 1120 could even deliver, (as part of a first HTTP/206 response) an initial notification which would provide a watcher a baseline presence view.
It is also further possible to eliminate the optional step of returning details of presence context as shown by arrow 1134.
In a further embodiment, PAL context establishment, the messages of arrow 1140 and 1142 are optional and are provided for illustrative purposes. It is possible for a watcher or watcher group to initiate the trigger events stream and await the presence trigger indications related to one or more presentities, as shown by arrows 1150,1152 and 1160.
An alternative embodiment for the PAL presence context environment is shown with a substantially optimized call flow with regard to
At arrow 1232 the presence context based on the service ID and optionally the watcher ID and resource URI is established and in response the HTTP/206 response is sent to the PAL client 1210. The HTTP/206 response is shown by arrow 1234.
The HTTP/206-OK provides the status of the presentities that the watcher is watching and thus the PAL client 1210 updates the values for the presence aspects for the indicated presentities as shown by arrow 1240. Subsequently, when a change is detected for an identified presence information element, the HTTP/206-OK message 1250 is sent from PAL 1220 to PAL client 1210 providing the changes.
As will be appreciated by those in the art, the establishment and communication of presence context may be carried out using transport protocol other than HTTP. For example the SIP protocol could be used to develop a similar call flow. That is, assuming a SIP session initiation method that permits non-media types “SIP:INVITE” or non “SIP:SUBSCRIBE” sessions to be directed towards another user/agent, it is possible for a PAL presence context instance to be established. Following this SIP session establishment, existing SIP:MESSAGE datagrams may be used in either direction to mirror the HTTP based call flows outlined in messages 1140, 1142, 1150, 1152 and 1160 of
In an alternative embodiment, it is also possible for the establishment of presence context to occur without a presence access layer altogether. For example, a presence service itself could establish an applicable presence context based on a service identifier or other meta-information such as a watcher ID, presentity or resource URI, among others. The establishment of the presence context could be achieved, for example, using a specific type of SIP:SUBSCRIBE method between a watcher client and/or watcher agent and a presence platform such as the OMA Presence SIMPLE platform. In a similar manner to PAL, the presence service could directly take on the responsibility of establishing an applicable presence context and could therefore implicitly tune or refine the notification mechanism on a watchers behalf.
The above therefore illustrates a means by which a watcher or a watcher group can associate applicable presence information for a particular service with further enhancement or narrowing based on who the watcher is and possibly the resource they wish to function with. The use of the mechanism saves data from being transmitted over a network, thereby saving network resources and battery life on a mobile device.
Further, the mechanism provided above is also capable of initiating subscription relative to a given service, as a part of the establishment of a presence context by a watcher over the air. This is due to the PAL being able to utilize the messages and indication of a trigger event stream and to immediately begin notifying. The benefit of this is the elimination of the requirement for costly presence subscriptions and the chattiness of the presence SIMPLE protocol. The presence context may be used to establish both the initial presence state indications and succinct and easy to consume manner and eliminates the requirement to perform subsequent subscription requests to narrow the delivery of presence information to satisfy subsequent information deltas.
Advantages of utilizing the service context include limiting messaging that is required, thus saving network resources and possibly battery life on a mobile device. A watcher client does not need to overtly tell the presence service or presence aware layer what is relevant, nor will a subscription be required for each target presentity.
The embodiments described herein are examples of structures, systems or methods having elements corresponding to elements of the techniques of this application. This written description may enable those skilled in the art to make and use embodiments having alternative elements that likewise correspond to the elements of the techniques of this application. The intended scope of the techniques of this application thus includes other structures, systems or methods that do not differ from the techniques of this application as described herein, and further includes other structures, systems or methods with insubstantial differences from the techniques of this application as described herein.
