Method and system for fail-safe motor operation

Abstract
An electric device includes a motor and a motor drive for commanding a torque generated by the motor. A fault control circuit detects a fault condition associated with the motor drive. Upon detection of the fault condition, the fault control circuit adjusts the torque commanded by the motor drive.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD AND BACKGROUND ART

The present invention relates to reduction or elimination of uncommanded torque in an electric device that includes, at least in part, a motor and a motor drive, in the event of failure.


Electric devices, that include, for example, a motor, are used for a wide variety of purposes. Many of these devices perform critical functions that affect human safety. For example, electric devices are often used in medical life support equipment or to drive a variety of transporters. Hence, it is often desirable that these devices have a high degree of reliability, and in many cases, a level of redundancy to prevent failure of the device.


Under normal circumstances, motor torque is commonly commanded by a motor drive 51, which regulates the flow of current from a power source 55 into the motor 52, as shown in FIG. 1 (prior art). The motor drive 51 typically includes a controller circuit 53 and a power stage 54, each of which might cause undesired values of current in the motor 52, which in turn causes undesired torque.


In some cases, failures lead to an open-circuited motor (i.e. zero current in the motor), which generally causes a loss of torque from the motor. One way to tolerate this failure mode is to use a motor with redundant windings and redundant drives, all sharing the required load torque, so that in the event of a loss of torque from a single winding and/or drive set, the remaining windings and drives can compensate and meet the necessary torque demands.


However, certain failure modes may cause undesired fault torque that remaining operating windings and drives are not able to overcome, regardless of the amount of redundancy provided. For example, motor terminals may be shorted together by the drive.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with a first embodiment of the invention there is provided an electric device that includes a motor. A motor drive commands torque to be generated by the motor. A fault control circuit adjusts the torque commanded by the motor drive based at least upon detection of a fault condition.


In related embodiments of the invention, the fault control circuit includes at least one relay, squib, and/or fuse for decoupling the motor drive from the motor. The at least one relay may be in a normally open position such that the motor drive is decoupled from the motor when the relay is not activated.


In yet another related embodiment of the invention, the fault control circuit controls, upon detection of the fault condition, the motor drive so as to reduce fault torque commanded by the motor drive. This may be accomplished, for example, by the fault control circuit adjusting a pulse duty-cycle of a signal applied to a winding of the motor.


In other related embodiments of the invention, the motor may have redundant winding sets. The fault control mechanism may include a fault detection circuit for detecting a failed component associated with the motor drive. The failed component may be a winding, a CPU, and/or RAM.


In still another related embodiment of the invention, the electric device may be a transporter and the motor is coupled to at least one ground contacting element of the transporter so as to propel the transporter. The transporter may be a dynamically stabilized transporter.


In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, an electric device includes a motor having a first winding set and a second winding set. A fault control circuit decouples one of the first winding set and the second winding set from all circuitry based at least on a fault condition.


In related embodiments of the invention, the fault control circuit includes at least one switch, squib, or fuse for decoupling the one of the first winding set and the second winding set from all circuitry. The at least one switch may be a relay. The at least one relay may be in a normally open position such that the one of the first winding set and the second winding set is decoupled from all circuitry when the relay is not activated. The fault condition may be a failure of a component associated with the first winding set, and the fault control circuit decouples the first winding set from all circuitry based at least on the failure. The component may be one of the first winding set, a power source, a motor drive, a sensor, a CPU, and a RAM. The fault control circuit may include a first processor associated with the first winding set; and a second processor associated with the second winding set.


In another related embodiment of the invention, the electric device may be a transporter in which case the motor is coupled to at least one ground contacting element of the transporter so as to propel the transporter. The transporter may be a dynamically stabilized transporter.


In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a method for controlling an electric device is presented. The electric device includes a motor having a winding set. The method includes detecting a fault condition associated with the winding set, and decoupling the winding set from all circuitry based at least on the fault condition. In related embodiments of the invention, the decoupling includes controlling at least one relay, squib, and/or fuse for decoupling the winding set.


In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, a method for controlling an electric device is presented. The electric device includes a motor driven by a motor drive. The method includes detecting a fault condition in the motor drive and reducing fault torque commanded by the motor drive based at least on the fault condition.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The foregoing features of the invention will be more readily understood by reference to the following detailed description, taken with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:



FIG. 1 is a block schematic of an electric device (prior art);



FIG. 2 is a block schematic of an electric device that includes at least one relay for decoupling a winding set of a motor, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram for decoupling one or more redundant windings of a motor from all circuitry based on detection of a fault condition, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 4 is a block schematic of an electric device that includes at least one squib for decoupling a winding set of the motor, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 5 is a block schematic of an electric device that includes at least one fuse for decoupling a winding set of a motor, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 6 is a block schematic of an electric device having a fault control circuit that controls, upon detection of a fault condition, a motor drive so as to reduce fault torque;



FIG. 7 is a table showing modifications to pulse duty-cycles of various motor drive signals upon detection of a fault condition, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 8 is a block schematic of a motor topology that is less susceptible to fault torque, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;



FIG. 9 depicts a balancing transporter to which the present invention may advantageously be applied; and



FIG. 10 is a block diagram of the system architecture of a balancing transporter in accordance with one embodiment of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF SPECIFIC EMBODIMENTS

A system and method for reducing or eliminating torque in an electric device that includes, at least in part, a motor and a motor drive, in the event of a fault condition is presented. In accordance with various embodiments of the invention, torque commanded by the motor drive associated with a fault condition may be eliminated by disconnecting the motor drive from the motor through, for example, the use of a relay, squibs, and/or fuses. In other embodiments of the invention, fault torque commanded by a motor drive associated with a fault condition may be reduced by controlling a portion of the motor drive that is still working properly, or by utilizing a motor topology that is less susceptible to fault torque. The present invention may be applied to electric devices that have various levels of redundancy, including electric devices that have no redundancy. For example, disconnection of a motor in a non-redundant electric device may be advantageous when zero torque can be tolerated but not fault torque, or when reduction of fault torque is useful if the resulting reduced fault torque is tolerable.


In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, FIG. 2 is a block schematic of an electric device that includes an electric motor 15. Motor 15 may be one of many types known in the art, such as an AC or DC motor and either brushed or brushless. Motor 15 has one or more winding sets 16, 17, which may be associated with either the armature or stator of motor 15. Each winding set 16, 17 may be capable of energizing the motor 15 in the event the complementary winding(s) are unable to energize the motor 15. Note that one skilled in the art will appreciate that a motor is inherently a generator, and that all further references to the term “motor,” as used in this description, and in the accompanying claims, shall mean a motor or a generator, unless the context otherwise requires.


Each winding set 16, 17 is driven by a separate power source, designated by numerals 5 and 6, respectively. Power source 5, 6 may be a battery, for example, and may be external to the electric device. While redundant power sources 5, 6 are shown in FIG. 2, it is to be understood that all winding sets may be driven by a single power source. However, this results in a loss of system redundancy.


Besides having redundant power supplies, each winding set 16, 17 may also be associated with other redundant components, such as redundant motor drives. Each redundant component in FIG. 2 is distinguished by a letter, A or B, which associates the component with either winding set A 16 or winding set B 17, respectively. For clarity, components associated with winding set A are separated from components associated with winding set B by dashed line 2. Line components associated with winding set A 16 include power supply A 5, motor drive A 9, and lead lines A 18. Line components associated with winding set B include power supply B 6, motor drive B 10, and lead lines B 19.


Referring now to the line of redundant components associated with winding set A 16, motor drive A 11 ensures that the appropriate power is applied to motor 15. Motor 15, in turn, rotates a shaft. The shaft may, for example, supply a torque, τ, at an angular velocity, ω, to a wheel of a transporter that is attached to shaft. In some embodiments, a transmission may be used to scale the wheel speed in relation to the angular velocity of the shaft. Winding set A 16 is electrically connected to motor drive A 113 by leads 18 capable of conducting large currents or high voltages. It is understood that the large currents and high voltages are relative to the currents and voltages normally used in signal processing and may cover, without limitation, the range above 1 ampere or 12 volts, respectively.


Motor drive A 11 may include both a drive controller A 11 and a power stage A 13 (similarly, motor drive B 10 may include drive controller B 12 and power stage B 14). Drive controller A 11 may be configured to control either current or voltage applied to motor 15. Power stage A 13 switches power source A 5 into or out of connection with each lead 18, with the switching of power stage A 13 controlled by drive controller A 11.


A fault control circuit 26 is provided that isolates winding set A 16 from some, or all, drive circuitry upon detection of a fault condition that affects, or potentially affects, proper operation of winding set A 16. The fault control circuit 26 may include at least one switch 8 that is controlled so as to decouple winding set A 16 from all other circuitry upon detection of the failure. Switch 8 may be positioned so as interrupt lead lines 18, thus preventing the passing of currents between motor drive A 9 and motor 15, protecting motor 15 from potential damage or from causing uncommanded torque. In other embodiments of the invention, other lines may be interrupted based on a detected fault. For example, a switch may be positioned so as to interrupt the line connecting power source A 5 to power stage A 13.


Switch 8 may be, without limitation, a relay. The relay may be connected in a normally-open position, such that when the relay is energized motor drive A 9 is connected to winding set A 16/motor 15, and when the relay is de-activated, motor drive A 9 is decoupled from winding set A 16/motor 15.


In a similar manner, switch 7 may be controlled by fault controller 27 so as decouple winding set B 17 from some, or all, other circuitry based on detection of a fault that affects, or potentially affects proper operation of winding B 17. This may be accomplished by positioning switch 7 so as to interrupt lead lines 19 or other lines, such as the line connecting power source A 5 to power stage A 13.



FIG. 3 is a flow diagram for controlling the decoupling of a motor winding set from all circuitry based on a detected fault or potential fault, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The routine may utilize, for example, a fault control circuit that is designed to connect the motor drive to the winding set/motor only when a number of components are operating properly. Such a fault control circuit will be familiar to those skilled in the art, and may include, without limitation, watchdog times and/or AC-coupled drivers, sensors and/or other electronic components. In various embodiments, the fault control circuit may include a processor located within the motor drive controller(s) 11, 12 (shown in FIG. 2), which runs control code located, for example, in memory associated with the motor drive controller(s) 11, 12. Such memory may be, for example, Random-Access Memory (RAM) or Read-Only Memory (ROM). The control program may be entered periodically by the motor drive controller.


The fault control circuit first determines whether a fault condition has been detected, step 22. A fault condition may indicate one of a variety of conditions adversely affecting proper operation of a winding/winding set. A fault may be related to the winding itself, or with the winding's associated line components. Other faults located elsewhere in the system that may affect proper operation of the winding or the winding's line components may also be detected, such as a fault pertaining to a system sensor. Examples of faults include, without limitation, a battery open condition, a CPU/RAM failure, a stopped clock, a motor winding open condition, a faulty sensor, stuck output, or a motor winding short condition.


A fault condition may indicate that a line or system component has failed. Alternatively, a fault condition may be an indication of an imminent failure of a line or system component, such as a battery over-temperature or a motor over-temperature. A wide variety of sensors known in the art may be utilized for monitoring component/system status, including, but not limited to, temperature, voltage, current, and motor shaft feedback sensors.


The fault control circuit may either continuously or periodically monitor for faults. Upon detection of a fault condition, the fault control circuit determines if the fault condition warrants decoupling of at least one winding or winding set from the drive circuitry, step 24. Such a determination may be based on, for example, the type and severity of the fault condition. For example, if the fault condition is indicative of a component failure that may occur in the distant future, the processor or control circuit may display an alert or perform further diagnostics instead of performing a decoupling operation. In various embodiments, only faults that warrant decoupling are detected, such that determination of whether a fault warrants decoupling is not required.


Upon detection of a fault condition that warrants decoupling, the fault control circuitry decouples at least one winding or winding set from some, or all, drive circuitry, step 25. As discussed above, this decoupling may be accomplished by, but not limited to, a switch which may be a relay.


In accordance with other embodiments of the invention, instead of a relay(s), squibs or fuses may be utilized to disconnect the motor from all, or portions, of the drive circuitry. Squibs and/or fuses may be advantageous, for example, when high-voltage circuits make arcing across a relay a concern, requiring intolerably large contact spacing. Furthermore, vibration prone applications may make it difficult to keep a relay in an open or closed position.



FIG. 4 is a block schematic that includes one or more squibs 28, 29 to decouple at least one winding or winding set 16, 17 from the motor drive 9, 10, respectively, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. The squibs 28, 29 include an explosive charge that can be electrically triggered by the fault control circuit 26, 27, respectively, upon detection of a fault. The squibs may be positioned so that upon detonation, the winding(s) or winding set(s) are isolated from the motor drive. Similar to the positioning of the switch as discussed above, the squib 28 may be positioned so as interrupt lead lines 18 thus preventing the passing of currents between motor drive A 9 and motor 15, protecting motor 15 from potential damage or from causing uncommanded torque. In other embodiments of the invention, other lines may be interrupted based on a detected fault. For example, a squib may be positioned so as to interrupt the line connecting power source A 5 to power stage A 13. Unlike the use of a relay, once detonated, circuitry disrupted by the exploded squib will require repair before subsequent use.


In accordance with another embodiment of the invention, at least one fuse 58, 59 may be utilized instead of a relay, as shown in FIG. 5. The fuses 58, 59 may be positioned, for example, in series with lead lines positioned between the motor drive and the winding set of motor 501. Upon detection of a fault, the fault control circuit (not shown) that controls switches 5257 will intentionally cause enough current from power supply 51 to blow the fuses 58, 59.


For example, in the electric device shown in FIG. 5, closing upper switches QAH 52 and QBH 54, and lower switch QCL 57 causes current to flow through, and blow, fuses F1 58 and F2 59. In preferred embodiments, the duration of the current provided is quick enough so that other electric components in the electric device are not adversely affected.


Instead of eliminating torque commanded by the faulted motor drive, the torque may be reduced by controlling a portion of the motor drive that is still working properly, or by utilizing a motor topology that is less susceptible to fault torque. In accordance with one embodiment of the invention, FIG. 6 is a schematic of a 3 phase permanent-magnet motor 68 and motor drive that includes fault control circuitry (not shown) that controls switches 6267 so as to reduce fault torque commanded in the event of a motor drive failure. Fault torque may occur, for example, if QAL 63 shorts, since current flows through the antiparallel diodes associated with QBL 65 and QCL 67 during periods of the motor's 68 rotation, which in turn causes drag torque in the 3 phase permanent-magnet motor 68. The fault control circuitry senses a short in one of the switches 6267 by pulsing each switch in sequence. When a complementary switch closes (for example, QAH 62 in FIG. 6) a large current will flow and the shorted switch (QAL in FIG. 6) can be sensed using resistor Rsense 69. The pulse time is kept short, for example, a few microseconds, to ensure that the switches, which are typically transistors, are not damaged. Once a faulted switch has been determined, the common-mode voltage applied to the motor 68 can be adjusted so as to accommodate the failure.


For example, in the system of FIG. 6, which has a 100V power supply 61, assume it is intended that 5v, 40v, and 95v be applied to the A, B, and C phases, respectively, by controlling the switches 6267 with pulse waveforms. If a shorted switch (QAL 63 in FIG. 6) is detected, the pulse duty cycles applied to the switches 6267 can be adjusted to accommodate the short, as show in FIG. 7, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. By adjusting each pulse duty cycle by the same amount such that the shorted switch has a desired duty cycle of 100%, the line-line voltages are preserved even though there is a short circuit (VBA=35 volts, VCA=90 volts in both cases). Note that this is possible for only one third of the commutation cycle, when VA≦VB and VA≦VC. During the rest of the cycle, voltage distortion occurs, which causes undesired current and undesired torque.



FIG. 8 is a schematic of a motor topology that is less susceptible to fault torque, in accordance with one embodiment of the invention. Rather than using a 3-phase motor, as shown in FIG. 7, the use of a two-phase motor 801 helps isolate a fault. Control of switches 8289 allow current from power supply 81 to pass to windings AB 802 and CD 803. A short in one of the switches 82-89 affects only one of the windings 802, 803. For example, if QAL shorts, the AB winding 801 is susceptible to fault torque, but not the CD 803 winding. This approach can be combined with reducing the fault torque commanded, as described above with regards to FIG. 7. For example, if QAL 83 shorts, the duty cycle on the B-phase can be adjusted so as maintain a desired line-line voltage VAB.



FIG. 9 shows a balancing personal transporter 30 to which the present invention may advantageously be applied. Transporter 30 is statically unstable with respect to tipping and requires operation of a control loop to maintain dynamic stability, Transporter 30 is described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,701,965, 5,971,091, and 6,288,505 B1, which are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.


Transporter 30 includes a support platform 32 for supporting a load, which may include a living subject 38, over the ground or other surface, such as a floor, which may be referred to herein generally as “ground”. A subject 38, for example, may stand or sit on support platform 32. Ground-contacting elements, which may be wheels 35 and 36, are shown as coaxial about the Y-axis. Attached to support platform 32 may be a handlebar 34 that can be gripped when riding transporter 10. Rider may control the fore-aft movement of the transporter by leaning. Steering or other control may be provided by thumbwheels 37 and 38, or by other user input mechanisms.


Transporter 30 includes a control system that actively maintains stability while the transporter 30 is operating. If the transporter 30 loses the ability to maintain stability, such as through the failure of a component, the safety of the rider may be at risk. Accordingly, the transporter 30 provides redundant architecture wherein critical components, such as the batteries, motor windings, and motor drives are replicated and run in parallel during operation of the transporter 30. If a failure in occurs in one line of components, the parallel line may still maintain the stability of the transporter 30, at least for a short period of time so as to allow the rider to bring the transporter to a safe stop. For example, if each winding and associated motor drive causes a desired torque of Tdesired/2, such that the total torque delivered is Tdesired before the fault, and one winding and/or drive fails and causes a torque Tfault, then the other winding/drive must have the ability to provide a torque Tdesired −Tfault+δ, where δ is small enough to maintain control of the motor. In various embodiments, due to the current or voltage associated with a failed component line, a failure, such as a short in the motor windings, may induce additional failures that cause the transporter 30 to malfunction. It may thus be advantageous to decouple the winding from all circuitry based on a failure associated with either the winding and/or the winding's line components.


Referring now to FIG. 7, a block diagram of the transporter's system architecture is shown, in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention. A left motor 110 is coupled to a left wheel 35 (shown in FIG. 1) and a right motor 120 is coupled to a right wheel 36 (wheels shown in FIG. 1). Each motor 110, 112 includes a redundant set of windings 111, 112 and 121, 122, respectively. Each winding 111, 112, 121, 122 and associated motor drive is capable of energizing the motor in the event the complimentary winding is unable to energize the motor. In the discussion below, each redundant component is distinguished by a two letter group identifying either the left (L) or right (R) side of the transporter and either the A group or B group of redundant components. For example, the left motor winding energized by the A group of components is designated as the LA winding.


Each motor winding 111, 112, 121, 122 is driven by a motor drive 132, 133, 142, 143. Motor drives 132, 133 are supplied by the A-group power supply 131 and motor drives 142, 143 are supplied by the B-group power supply 141. The electrical connections between the power supplies and the motor drives and between the motor drives and motor windings are expected to carry large currents up to 20 to 40 Amperes and are identified by thick lines 105 in FIG. 4.


The A-group motor drives 132, 133 are commanded by the A processor 135 while the B-group motor drives 142, 143 are commanded by the B processor 145. Power is supplied to the A processor from the A power source 131 through the A-group DC-DC converter 136. Similarly, the B power source 141 supplies power to the B processor 146 through the B-group DC-DC converter 145. The A-group motor drives 132, 133, A-group converter 136, and A processor 135 are preferably grouped together into a compartment or tray 130 that is at least partially isolated by a barrier 150 from the B-tray 140 containing the B-group motor drives 142, 143, B-group converter 146, and B processor 145. Physically separating the A tray 130 and B tray 140 reduces the probability of a common point failure. The barrier 150 acts to delay the propagation of a failure, in one tray to the other tray such that the transporter has sufficient time to put the rider in a safe condition to exit the transporter. Similarly, the A power supply 131 is physically separated from the B power supply 141. The A power supply 131 and the components in the A tray 130 are capable of driving both motors 110, 120 for at least a short period of time, in the event of a failure in any one of the B-group components. Conversely, the B power supply 141 and the components in the B tray 140 are capable of driving both motors 110, 120 for at least a short period of time if an A-group component fails.


Although the processors 135, 145 are physically isolated from each other, signal communication is maintained between the processors via communication channels 137, 147. Communication channels 137, 147 are preferably electrical conductors but may also be electromagnetic such as optical, infrared, microwave, or radio. The A channel 137 transmits signals from the A processor 135 to the B processor 145 and the B channel 147 transmits signals from the B processor 145 to the A processor 135. Optical isolators 139, 149 are incorporated into channels 137, 147 to prevent over-voltages from propagating from a shorted processor to the other processor.


Each processor receives signals from a plurality of sensors that monitor the state of the transporter and the input commands of the rider. The processor uses the sensor signals to determine and transmit the appropriate command to the motor amplifiers. Additionally, the processor uses the sensor signals to identify failures, or potential failures. Depending on the importance of the sensor to the operation of the transporter, the sensors may or may not be duplicated for redundancy. For example, the spatial orientation of the transporter is central to the operation of the transporter, and therefore an A-group IMU 181 supplies transporter orientation information to the A processor 135 and a B-group IMU 182 supplies transporter orientation information to the B-processor 145. On the other hand, the transporter may still be operated in a safe manner without the PTD 148 so only one such device is typically provided. Similarly, an output device such as a display 138 does not require redundancy. A non-redundant device such as a display 138 or a PTD 148 may be connected to either processor or may be switched between processors.


In the embodiment depicted in FIG. 4, display 138 is controlled by the A processor 135 and the PTD 148 is in direct signal communication with the B processor 145. The information provided by the PTD 148 is transmitted by the B processor 145 to the A processor 135 via the B channel 147.


Additionally, each processor 135, 145 communicates with one of the user interface processors (UIPs) 173, 174. Each UIP 173, 174 receives steering commands from the user through one of the yaw input devices 171, 172. An A-group UIP 173 also communicates to the non-redundant UIDs such as the display 138, brake switch 175, and pitch trim control 148. Other user interface devices that are not provided redundantly in the embodiment shown in FIG. 4, such as a sound warning device, lights, and an on/off switch, may also be connected to the A-group UIP 173. The A-group UIP 173 may also pass along information provided by the user interface devices to the B-group UIP 174. In accordance with one embodiment, the A-group UIP 173 compares calculations of the A-group processor with calculations of the B-group processor and queries the A-group processor 135 with a ‘watchdog’ calculation to verify operation of the A-group processor. Similarly, the B-group UIP 174 queries the B-group processor 145 to verify normal operation of the B-group processor.


Each processor 135, 145 executes code, as discussed in above embodiments of the present invention, to decouple its associated winding from all circuitry based upon indications of a relevant failure. In particular, A processor 135 controls relay 191 and 192, while B processor controls relays 193 and 194. Opening relays 191, 192, 193 or 194 isolates LA winding 111, RA winding 121, LB winding 112, and RB winding 122 from all circuitry, respectively. This prevents the transfer of erroneous current to or from the winding. Thus, additional faults may be prevented. Continued operation of the motor upon loss of power to one of the motor's windings is achieved via the motor's at least one other redundant winding, since each redundant winding is coupled to a motor drive via a different switch. In other embodiments, instead of a relay, squibs or fuses may be used to isolate the windings, or circuitry may be utilized to reduce fault torques, as described in above embodiments.


The described embodiments of the invention are intended to be merely exemplary and numerous variations and modifications will be apparent to those skilled in the art. All such variations and modifications are intended to be within the scope of the present invention as defined in the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. An electric device comprising: a motor having a first winding set and a second winding set, the first winding set and the second winding set being redundant; anda fault control circuit for decoupling one of the first winding set and the second winding set from all circuitry, including from each other, based at least on a fault condition.
  • 2. The electric device according to claim 1, wherein the fault control circuit includes at least one switch for decoupling the one of the first winding set and the second winding set from all circuitry.
  • 3. The electric device according to claim 2, wherein the at least one switch is a relay.
  • 4. The electric device according to claim 3, wherein the at least one relay is in a normally open position such that the one of the first winding set and the second winding set is decoupled from all circuitry when the relay is not activated.
  • 5. The electric device according to claim 1, wherein the fault control circuit includes at least one squib for decoupling the one of the first winding set and the second winding set.
  • 6. The electric device according to claim 1, wherein the fault control circuit includes at least fuse for decoupling the one of the first winding set and the second winding set.
  • 7. The electric device according to claim 1, wherein the fault condition is a failure of a component associated with the first winding set, and the fault control circuit decouples the first winding set from all circuitry based at least on the fault condition.
  • 8. The electric device according to claim 7, wherein the component is one of the first winding set, a power source, a motor drive, a sensor, a CPU, and a RAM.
  • 9. The electric device according to claim 1, further comprising a controller, the controller including: a first processor associated with the first winding set; anda second processor associated with the second winding set.
  • 10. The electric device according to claim 1, wherein the electric device is a transporter and the motor is coupled to at least one ground contacting element of the transporter so as to propel the transporter.
  • 11. The transporter according to claim 10, wherein the transporter is a dynamically stabilized transporter.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

The present application is a divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/307,892, filed Dec. 2, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,965,206, which in turn is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 09/687,789, filed Oct. 13, 2000, now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,581,714. Each of the above-described applications is hereby incorporated by reference.

US Referenced Citations (115)
Number Name Date Kind
584127 Draullette et al. Jun 1897 A
849270 Schafer et al. Apr 1907 A
2742973 Johannesen Apr 1956 A
3145797 Taylor Aug 1964 A
3260324 Suarez Jul 1966 A
3283398 Andren Nov 1966 A
3288234 Feliz Nov 1966 A
3348518 Forsyth et al. Oct 1967 A
3374845 Selwyn Mar 1968 A
3399742 Malick Sep 1968 A
3446304 Alimanestiano May 1969 A
3450219 Fleming Jun 1969 A
3515401 Gross Jun 1970 A
3568018 Macdonald Mar 1971 A
3580344 Floyd May 1971 A
3582712 Blair Jun 1971 A
3596298 Durst, Jr. Aug 1971 A
3803473 Stich Apr 1974 A
3860264 Douglas et al. Jan 1975 A
3872945 Hickman et al. Mar 1975 A
3952822 Udden et al. Apr 1976 A
4018440 Deutsch Apr 1977 A
4062558 Wasserman Dec 1977 A
4076270 Winchell Feb 1978 A
4088199 Trautwein May 1978 A
4094372 Notter Jun 1978 A
4109741 Gabriel Aug 1978 A
4111445 Haibeck Sep 1978 A
4151892 Francken May 1979 A
4222449 Felix Sep 1980 A
4264082 Fouchey, Jr. Apr 1981 A
4266627 Lauber May 1981 A
4270164 Wyman et al. May 1981 A
4293052 Daswick et al. Oct 1981 A
4325565 Winchell Apr 1982 A
4354569 Eichholz Oct 1982 A
4363493 Veneklasen Dec 1982 A
4373600 Buschbom et al. Feb 1983 A
4375840 Campbell Mar 1983 A
4426611 Espelage et al. Jan 1984 A
4434389 Langley et al. Feb 1984 A
4510956 King Apr 1985 A
4536686 Gartner Aug 1985 A
4550267 Vaidya Oct 1985 A
4560022 Kassai Dec 1985 A
4566707 Nitzberg Jan 1986 A
4571844 Komasaku et al. Feb 1986 A
4607205 Kito et al. Aug 1986 A
4624469 Bourne, Jr. Nov 1986 A
4657272 Davenport Apr 1987 A
4685693 Vadjunec Aug 1987 A
4709772 Brunet Dec 1987 A
4740001 Torleumke Apr 1988 A
4746132 Eagan May 1988 A
4746843 Taenzer May 1988 A
4770410 Brown Sep 1988 A
4786069 Tang Nov 1988 A
4790400 Sheeter Dec 1988 A
4790548 Decelles et al. Dec 1988 A
4794999 Hester Jan 1989 A
4798255 Wu Jan 1989 A
4802542 Houston et al. Feb 1989 A
4806839 Nagato et al. Feb 1989 A
4809804 Houston et al. Mar 1989 A
4834200 Kajita May 1989 A
4863182 Chern Sep 1989 A
4867188 Reid Sep 1989 A
4869279 Hedges Sep 1989 A
4874055 Beer Oct 1989 A
4890853 Olson Jan 1990 A
4919225 Sturges Apr 1990 A
4953851 Sherlock et al. Sep 1990 A
4984754 Yarrington Jan 1991 A
4985947 Ethridge Jan 1991 A
4998596 Miksitz Mar 1991 A
4999552 Seipelt Mar 1991 A
5002295 Lin Mar 1991 A
5011171 Cook Apr 1991 A
5052237 Reimann Oct 1991 A
5057962 Alley et al. Oct 1991 A
5111899 Reimann May 1992 A
5158493 Morgrey Oct 1992 A
5168947 Rodenborn Dec 1992 A
5171173 Henderson et al. Dec 1992 A
5186270 West Feb 1993 A
5221883 Takenaka et al. Jun 1993 A
5241875 Kochanneck Sep 1993 A
5248007 Watkins et al. Sep 1993 A
5303156 Matsuoka et al. Apr 1994 A
5314034 Chittal May 1994 A
5350033 Kraft Sep 1994 A
5366036 Perry Nov 1994 A
5499186 Carosa Mar 1996 A
5701965 Kamen et al. Dec 1997 A
5701968 Wright-Ott et al. Dec 1997 A
5775452 Patmont Jul 1998 A
5791425 Kamen et al. Aug 1998 A
5794730 Kamen Aug 1998 A
5928366 Kawasaki Jul 1999 A
5929549 Trago et al. Jul 1999 A
5971091 Kamen et al. Oct 1999 A
5975225 Kamen et al. Nov 1999 A
6003624 Jorgensen et al. Dec 1999 A
6059062 Staelin et al. May 2000 A
6118246 Eyerly Sep 2000 A
6125957 Kauffmann Oct 2000 A
6148939 Brookhart et al. Nov 2000 A
6170598 Furukawa Jan 2001 B1
6246232 Okumura Jun 2001 B1
6271638 Erdman et al. Aug 2001 B1
6276230 Crum et al. Aug 2001 B1
6288505 Heinzmann et al. Sep 2001 B1
6297573 Roth-Stielow et al. Oct 2001 B1
6334084 Moteki et al. Dec 2001 B1
6759823 Witzig Jul 2004 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (30)
Number Date Country
2 048 593 May 1971 DE
31 28 112 Feb 1983 DE
32 42 880 Jun 1983 DE
34 11 489 Oct 1984 DE
298 08 091 Oct 1998 DE
298 08 096 Oct 1998 DE
0 109 927 Jul 1984 EP
0 193 473 Sep 1986 EP
0 537 698 Apr 1993 EP
980 237 May 1951 FR
82 04314 Sep 1982 FR
152664 Feb 1922 GB
1213930 Nov 1970 GB
2 139 576 Nov 1984 GB
52 44933 Oct 1975 JP
57 87766 Jun 1982 JP
57 110569 Jul 1982 JP
59 73372 Apr 1984 JP
62 12810 Jul 1985 JP
0255580 Dec 1985 JP
61 31685 Feb 1986 JP
2 190277 Jul 1990 JP
6 171562 Dec 1992 JP
5 213240 Aug 1993 JP
6 105415 Dec 1994 JP
7255780 Mar 1995 JP
63 305082 Dec 1998 JP
WO 8605752 Oct 1986 WO
WO 8906117 Jul 1989 WO
WO 9623478 Aug 1996 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060125433 A1 Jun 2006 US
Divisions (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 10307892 Dec 2002 US
Child 11273581 US
Continuation in Parts (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 09687789 Oct 2000 US
Child 10307892 US