The present invention relates generally to mail delivery, and more particularly to electronically assisted mail delivery.
Recently, progress has been made in streamlining mail sortation. For example, U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/589,634, filed Jul. 21, 2004 is incorporated herein by reference. That previous invention used a folder/divider system for escorting mail through a sortation system. One aspect of this progress has been an increased use of electronic databases to record destinations of mail pieces, and to associate those destinations with respective folder/dividers. This electronic data regarding the destination addresses of surface mail has not yet been exploited at the delivery end, after a carrier has obtained sorted mail from a sorting system.
The posts around the world are very interested in ways for making mail carriers more efficient. The USPS recently engaged four suppliers to develop methods of merging flats and letters mail streams and wrapping all the mail for each delivery point in a packet. This initiative was intended to reduce the amount of time each carrier must spend manually sorting mail for the route each morning before leaving the DDU (Destination Delivery Unit=local post office), and reduce “fingering time” in which the carrier determines how many pieces are to be delivered to each address. Fingering time varies between 20 and 45 seconds per address.
Mailers and mail recipients have indicated displeasure with the USPS' plans to bundle or wrap mail for each address into packets. If the USPS heeds these warnings, they will lose some of the efficiency because the fingering time will be not be reduced as much as planned.
Additionally, posts face another issue related to carrier efficiency. Since carriers work a five day week, and mail must be delivered six days a week, at least one day each week, a substitute carrier must be used on each route to sort and deliver the mail. Also, when a carrier is on vacation, or calls in sick, substitutes must be used. The substitutes are not as familiar with the route as the assigned carrier, so they take longer to sort the mail, learn the route, and finger the mail while in transit.
The present invention assists a mail carrier to deliver a group of mail pieces. The group of mail pieces is received from a sorting system, for delivery to respective final destinations. Also, the sorting system provides delivery data, preferably in electronic form, about delivering the group of mail pieces. Then, a global positioning system (GPS) is used to ascertain a location of the mail carrier along a mail route. And, information is provided to the mail carrier regarding delivery of the group of mail pieces, in response to the location of the mail carrier and in response to the delivery data that was received from the sorting system. For example, the mail carrier is alerted regarding the number of packages or mail pieces to be delivered, as a function of where the carrier is located.
The delivery data can include not just data about the destinations of mail to be delivered, but can also include data about the delivery route, including driving directions. This is particularly useful if the mail carrier is a new mail carrier for the mail route, or if the mail carrier is a substitute mail carrier for the mail route, or if the mail carrier is temporarily assigned an expanded route.
The delivery data received from the sorting system may include data regarding deliveries to the respective final destinations. In that case, the information provided to the mail carrier along his or her route includes guidance regarding deliveries that are upcoming soon along the mail route. Such guidance can describe what number of pieces or what types of pieces are to be delivered to each of the respective final destinations. However, even if the delivery data includes details about upcoming deliveries along a route, the mail carrier can have an option such that the information to the mail carrier additionally includes driving directions. The guidance provided to a carrier can usefully include a description of delivery points that are to be bypassed due to the number of mail pieces being zero for that delivery point.
It may happen that the mail carrier is temporarily assigned to an expanded route and another mail carrier is temporarily assigned to a reduced route, in order to more equally distribute work for the two mail carriers. Preferably, the mail pieces received from the sorting system would be sorted according to these temporary assignments. The information provided to the mail carrier can be provided verbally or visually or both, by an electronic device.
The accompanying drawings illustrate presently preferred embodiments of the invention, and together with the general description given above and the detailed description given below, serve to explain the principles of the invention. As shown throughout the drawings, like reference numerals designate like or corresponding parts.
This invention helps make carriers (and substitute carriers) more efficient by using the information gathered by the delivery sequence sorter, and information about the delivery route, combined with GPS (global positioning systems) technology.
Carrier delivery sequence sorters capture information on every mail piece on a route including how many pieces are to be delivered to each address. Additionally, information from special handling items (registered mail, etc), and parcels can be scanned for each route. This information along with route delivery sequence information is loaded into an electronic storage device having a memory, a method of communicating with an operator such as a display or an audio system, and a GPS technology. This combination of capabilities is hereafter referred to as a GPS system. The GPS system can either be a handheld device, or a GPS/map display having verbal instruction capability—such as currently available for cars. The GPS system gives substitute carriers precise information on the delivery sequence of the route while the carrier is delivering the mail.
Additionally, as the carrier approaches each delivery point, the GPS device tells the carrier how many mail pieces to deliver to that address. These might be verbal or visual prompts such as: “Three pieces of mail for this address”, or “no mail for this address, so proceed to the next one”, or “you have two special delivery items for this address.”
This invention eliminates the need for the carrier to finger through the mail to determine how many pieces are to be delivered to each address, eliminates the need for the carrier to be familiar with the route, and eliminates the need to remember when special items and parcels need to be delivered to each address. Thus, it makes both the mail carrier and substitute carriers far more efficient. The USPS has a stated goal of improving last mile efficiency.
This invention significantly improves the efficiency of mail carriers in two ways. First, it uses GPS technology combined with route information to guide substitute carriers along an unfamiliar route with specific instructions on the specific delivery sequence. Second, information generated by the delivery sequence sorter on the number of mail pieces to be delivered to each address is loaded into the memory of the GPS device each day. Information on special items is also loaded into the memory of the GPS. On the route, the GPS gives precise instructions to the carrier at each address on the number of mail pieces, parcels, and special items are to be delivered to that address.
These improvements eliminate backtracking to deliver missed items, and it reduces the amount of time the carrier spends at each address fingering through the mail to determine how many pieces are to be delivered to each address.
If this invention is successful in saving each carrier only 10 seconds at each address, and the average route in the US has 600 addresses, each carrier will save 1.67 hours delivering the mail every day. There are about 130,000 routes in the USA, and the mail is delivered 300 days each year. If the average salary for carriers is, say $45,000 per year, this savings of only 10 seconds per address will add up to savings of $1.4 billion each year.
Additional savings will be available to the USPS by enabling substitute carriers to be nearly as efficient as the regularly assigned carriers. The present invention will enable managers at the posts to optimize the routes on a daily basis based on the volume of mail for each address. So, on a given day, if one carrier has a heavier than normal amount of mail to deliver, and another carrier has a lighter than normal amount, the manager can dynamically modify the two routes so that each carrier has about the same amount of work to do. The GPS system along with the information on the mail to be delivered at each stop will enable the carrier with the lighter initial load to be efficient in delivering mail to a portion the other route. This will reduce overtime, and allow the managers to optimize workloads for all carriers each day based on mail volume information.
Key elements of this system and method include a GPS device having a display, and/or audible prompts, a memory loaded with information about the carrier route and delivery sequence. Data on the number of pieces to be delivered to each address on the route, can be downloaded into the GPS device memory each day based on information developed by a delivery sequence sorter during sorting operations. The system furthermore includes data from other items to be delivered (registered mail, parcels, etc), which is also loaded into the GPS system memory.
The GPS device guides carriers unfamiliar with the route through a delivery sequence that matches the delivery sequence into which the mail pieces were sorted. Additionally, at each stop, the GPS device advises the carrier on how many pieces are do be delivered, and if there are any special items to be delivered. Generally, if the GPS says “three pieces for this address”, they will be the next three pieces in the tray or bag—so the carrier will not have to finger through the mail to read each address to determine the number of pieces. This system will save the carrier time at each stop.
Referring now to the figures,
Turning now to
Turning now to
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that the configurations depicted in
It is to be understood that all of the present figures, and the accompanying narrative discussions of best mode embodiments, do not purport to be completely rigorous treatments of the methods and systems under consideration. A person skilled in the art will understand that the steps of the present application represent general cause-and-effect relationships that do not exclude intermediate interactions of various types, and will further understand that the various structures described in this application can be implemented by a variety of different combinations of hardware and software, and in various configurations which need not be further elaborated herein.
The present application claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/634,014 filed Dec. 7, 2004 which is also incorporated by reference herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2005/044406 | 12/7/2005 | WO | 00 | 8/28/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/063121 | 6/15/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
803968 | Barry | Nov 1905 | A |
1423952 | McCracken | Jul 1922 | A |
1783687 | Shaw | Dec 1930 | A |
2446610 | Renfro | Aug 1948 | A |
2852257 | Sperry | Sep 1958 | A |
3032341 | Reist | May 1962 | A |
3055480 | Hyman | Sep 1962 | A |
3420368 | Sorrells | Jan 1969 | A |
3452509 | Hauer | Jul 1969 | A |
3587856 | Lemelson | Jun 1971 | A |
3659890 | Renfro | May 1972 | A |
3757939 | Henig | Sep 1973 | A |
3884370 | Bradshaw et al. | May 1975 | A |
3889811 | Yoshimura | Jun 1975 | A |
3901797 | Storace | Aug 1975 | A |
3904027 | Gilles et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
3904516 | Chiba | Sep 1975 | A |
3933094 | Murphy | Jan 1976 | A |
3960264 | Carbine et al. | Jun 1976 | A |
3008813 | Leersnijder | Feb 1977 | A |
4008813 | Leersnijder | Feb 1977 | A |
4058217 | Vaughan | Nov 1977 | A |
4106636 | Ouimet | Aug 1978 | A |
4169529 | Hunter | Oct 1979 | A |
4244672 | Lund | Jan 1981 | A |
4303503 | de Mimerand et al. | Dec 1981 | A |
4507739 | Haruki | Mar 1985 | A |
4594754 | Spicer | Jun 1986 | A |
4627540 | Takeda | Dec 1986 | A |
4632252 | Haruki et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4641753 | Tamada | Feb 1987 | A |
4681213 | Winiasz | Jul 1987 | A |
4688678 | Zue | Aug 1987 | A |
4738368 | Shaw | Apr 1988 | A |
4848538 | Vaida et al. | Jul 1989 | A |
4868570 | Davis | Sep 1989 | A |
4874281 | Bergerioux | Oct 1989 | A |
4878577 | Romero Lledo et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4891088 | Svyatsky | Jan 1990 | A |
4895242 | Michel | Jan 1990 | A |
4920487 | Baffes | Apr 1990 | A |
4921107 | Hofer | May 1990 | A |
4921294 | Klopfenstein | May 1990 | A |
4923022 | Hsieh | May 1990 | A |
4965829 | Lemelson | Oct 1990 | A |
4978117 | Maier et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5031223 | Rosenbaum | Jul 1991 | A |
5042667 | Keough | Aug 1991 | A |
5072401 | Sansone et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5119954 | Svyatsky | Jun 1992 | A |
5186336 | Pippin | Feb 1993 | A |
5291002 | Agnew | Mar 1994 | A |
5470427 | Mikel | Nov 1995 | A |
5480032 | Pippin | Jan 1996 | A |
5718321 | Brugger | Feb 1998 | A |
5838277 | Loomis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5880958 | Helms et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5881890 | Wiley | Mar 1999 | A |
5937485 | Dittmer | Aug 1999 | A |
5981891 | Yamashita | Nov 1999 | A |
6029111 | Croyle | Feb 2000 | A |
6126017 | Hours | Oct 2000 | A |
6208910 | Michael et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6227378 | Jones | May 2001 | B1 |
6276509 | Schuster | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6286662 | Meier | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6347710 | Ryan | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6365862 | Miller | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6394449 | Reist | May 2002 | B1 |
6403906 | De Leo | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411897 | Gaspard, II | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6435353 | Ryan | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6443311 | Hendrickson | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6464067 | Reist | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6555776 | Roth et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6561339 | Olson | May 2003 | B1 |
6561360 | Kalm | May 2003 | B1 |
6677548 | Robu | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6814210 | Hendzel | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6856860 | Stringham et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6897395 | Shiibashi | May 2005 | B2 |
6921875 | Hanson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6946612 | Morikawa | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6953906 | Burns | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6994220 | Schererz | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7004396 | Quine | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7111742 | Zimmermann | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7112031 | Harres | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7112756 | Hanson | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7138596 | Pippin | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7170024 | Burns | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7210893 | Overman | May 2007 | B1 |
7227094 | Oexle | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7235756 | De Leo | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7259345 | Kechel | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7259346 | Svyatsky | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7304260 | Boller | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7378610 | Umezawa | May 2008 | B2 |
7396011 | Svyatsky | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7397010 | Wilke | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7397011 | Berdelle-Hilge | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7464822 | Coffelt et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20020053533 | Brehm | May 2002 | A1 |
20020055818 | Gaspard, II | May 2002 | A1 |
20020089434 | Ghazarian | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020139726 | Roth et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030006174 | Harres | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030038065 | Pippin et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040030661 | Amato | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20050131576 | De Leo et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060070929 | Fry | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060124512 | Quine | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060180520 | Ehrat | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060191822 | Avant | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070090029 | Avant | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070131593 | Burns | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070272601 | Cormack | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080011653 | Stemmle | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080012211 | Stemmle | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080027986 | Stemmle | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080093273 | Stemmle | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080093274 | Stemmle | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080164185 | Stemmle | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090005900 | Stemmle | Jan 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1202234 | May 2002 | EP |
1396595 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1396595 | Mar 2004 | EP |
1528496 | May 2005 | EP |
2630412 | Oct 1989 | FR |
2 382 559 | Apr 2003 | GB |
1-159088 | Jun 1989 | JP |
1-271789 | Oct 1989 | JP |
WO0016293 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0045977 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 03043750 | May 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090005900 A1 | Jan 2009 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60634014 | Dec 2004 | US |