Method and system for inline deduplication using erasure coding

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 11281389
  • Patent Number
    11,281,389
  • Date Filed
    Friday, November 20, 2020
    4 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 22, 2022
    3 years ago
Abstract
A method includes obtaining a data, applying an erasure coding procedure to the data to obtain a plurality of data chunks and at least one parity chunk, deduplicating the plurality of data chunks to obtain a plurality of deduplicated data chunks, and storing, across a plurality of nodes, the plurality of deduplicated data chunks and the at least one parity chunk.
Description
BACKGROUND

Computing devices may include any number of internal components such as processors, memory, and persistent storage. Each of the internal components of a computing device may be used to generate data. The process of generating, storing, and backing-up data may utilize computing resources of the computing devices such as processing and storage. The utilization of the aforementioned computing resources to generate backups may impact the overall performance of the computing resources.


SUMMARY

In general, in one aspect, the invention relates to a method for managing data in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. The method includes obtaining data, applying an erasure coding procedure to the data to obtain a plurality of data chunks and at least one parity chunk, deduplicating the plurality of data chunks to obtain a plurality of deduplicated data chunks, and storing, across a plurality of nodes, the plurality of deduplicated data chunks and the at least one parity chunk.


In one aspect, a non-transitory computer readable medium in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention includes computer readable program code, which when executed by a computer processor enables the computer processor to perform a method for managing data. The method includes obtaining data, applying an erasure coding procedure to the data to obtain a plurality of data chunks and at least one parity chunk, deduplicating the plurality of data chunks to obtain a plurality of deduplicated data chunks, and storing, across a plurality of nodes, the plurality of deduplicated data chunks and the at least one parity chunk.


In one aspect, a data cluster in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention includes data nodes comprising an accelerator pool and a non-accelerator pool. The accelerator pool comprises a data node, and the non-accelerator pool comprises a plurality of data nodes. A data node of the plurality of nodes is programmed to obtain data, apply an erasure coding procedure to the data to obtain a plurality of data chunks and at least one parity chunk, deduplicate the plurality of data chunks to obtain a plurality of deduplicated data chunks, and store, across the plurality of nodes, the plurality of deduplicated data chunks and the at least one parity chunk.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF DRAWINGS

Certain embodiments of the invention will be described with reference to the accompanying drawings. However, the accompanying drawings illustrate only certain aspects or implementations of the invention by way of example and are not meant to limit the scope of the claims.



FIG. 1A shows a diagram of a system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 1B shows a diagram of a data cluster in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 2 shows a flowchart for storing data in a data cluster in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.



FIGS. 3A-3C show an example in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 4 shows a diagram of a computing device in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION

Specific embodiments will now be described with reference to the accompanying figures. In the following description, numerous details are set forth as examples of the invention. It will be understood by those skilled in the art that one or more embodiments of the present invention may be practiced without these specific details and that numerous variations or modifications may be possible without departing from the scope of the invention. Certain details known to those of ordinary skill in the art are omitted to avoid obscuring the description.


In the following description of the figures, any component described with regard to a figure, in various embodiments of the invention, may be equivalent to one or more like-named components described with regard to any other figure. For brevity, descriptions of these components will not be repeated with regard to each figure. Thus, each and every embodiment of the components of each figure is incorporated by reference and assumed to be optionally present within every other figure having one or more like-named components. Additionally, in accordance with various embodiments of the invention, any description of the components of a figure is to be interpreted as an optional embodiment, which may be implemented in addition to, in conjunction with, or in place of the embodiments described with regard to a corresponding like-named component in any other figure.


Throughout this application, elements of figures may be labeled as A to N. As used herein, the aforementioned labeling means that the element may include any number of items and does not require that the element include the same number of elements as any other item labeled as A to N. For example, a data structure may include a first element labeled as A and a second element labeled as N. This labeling convention means that the data structure may include any number of the elements. A second data structure, also labeled as A to N, may also include any number of elements. The number of elements of the first data structure and the number of elements of the second data structure may be the same or different.


In general, embodiments of the invention relate to a method and system for storing data in a data cluster. Embodiments of the invention may utilize a deduplicator, operating in an accelerator pool, which applies an erasure coding procedure on data obtained from a host to divide the data into data chunks and to generate parity chunks using the data chunks. The deduplicator may then perform deduplication on the data chunks to generate deduplicated data chunks. The deduplicated data chunks and the parity chunks are subsequently distributed to nodes in the data cluster in accordance with an erasure coding procedure.



FIG. 1A shows an example system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. The system includes a host (100) and a data cluster (110). The host (100) is operably connected to the data cluster (110) via any combination of wired and/or wireless connections.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, the host (100) utilizes the data cluster (110) to store data. The data stored may be backups of databases, files, applications, and/or other types of data without departing from the invention.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, the host (100) is implemented as a computing device (see e.g., FIG. 4). The computing device may be, for example, a laptop computer, a desktop computer, a server, a distributed computing system, or a cloud resource (e.g., a third-party storage system accessible via a wired or wireless connection). The computing device may include one or more processors, memory (e.g., random access memory), and persistent storage (e.g., disk drives, solid state drives, etc.). The computing device may include instructions, stored on the persistent storage, that when executed by the processor(s) of the computing device cause the computing device to perform the functionality of the host (100) described throughout this application.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, the host (100) is implemented as a logical device. The logical device may utilize the computing resources of any number of computing devices and thereby provide the functionality of the host (100) described throughout this application.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, the data cluster (110) stores data and/or backups of data generated by the host (100). The backups may be deduplicated versions of backups obtained from the host. The data cluster may, via an erasure coding procedure, store portions of the deduplicated data across the nodes operating in the data cluster (110).


As used herein, deduplication refers to methods of storing only portions of files (also referred to as file segments or segments) that are not already stored in persistent storage. For example, when multiple versions of a large file, having only minimal differences between each of the versions, are stored without deduplication, storing each version will require approximately the same amount of storage space of a persistent storage. In contrast, when the multiple versions of the large file are stored with deduplication, only the first version of the multiple versions stored will require a substantial amount of storage. Once the first version is stored in the persistent storage, the subsequent versions of the large file subsequently stored will be de-duplicated before being stored in the persistent storage resulting in much less storage space of the persistent storage being required to store the subsequently stored versions when compared to the amount of storage space of the persistent storage required to store the first stored version.


Continuing with the discussion of FIG. 1A, the data cluster (110) may include nodes that each store any number of deduplicated data chunks. The deduplicated data chunks may be portions of data obtained by other nodes or obtained from the host (100). For additional details regarding the data cluster (110), see, e.g., FIG. 1B.



FIG. 1B shows a diagram of a data cluster (120) in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. The data cluster (120) may be an embodiment of the data cluster (110, FIG. 1A) discussed above. The data cluster (120) may include an accelerator pool (130) and a non-accelerator pool (150). The accelerator pool (130) may include a deduplicator(s) (132) and any number of data nodes (134, 136). Similarly, the non-accelerator pool (150) includes any number of data nodes (154, 156). The components of the data cluster (120) may be operably connected via any combination of wired and/or wireless connections. Each of the aforementioned components is discussed below.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, the deduplicator(s) (132) is a device that includes functionality to perform deduplication on data obtained from a host (e.g., 100, FIG. 1A). The deduplicator (132) may store information useful to perform the aforementioned functionality. The information may include deduplication identifiers (D-IDs). A D-ID is a unique identifier that identifies portions of data (also referred to as data chunks) that are stored in the data cluster (120). The D-ID may be used to determine whether a data chunk of obtained data is already present elsewhere in the accelerator pool (140) or the non-accelerator pool (150). The deduplicator (132) may use the information to perform the deduplication and generate deduplicated data. After deduplication, an erasure coding procedure may be performed on the deduplicated data in order to generate parity chunks. The deduplicator (132) may perform the deduplication and erasure coding procedure via the method illustrated in FIG. 2.


In one or more of embodiments of the invention, the deduplicator (132) is implemented as computer instructions, e.g., computer code, stored on a persistent storage that when executed by a processor of a data node (e.g., 134, 136) of the accelerator pool (140) cause the data node to provide the aforementioned functionality of the deduplicator (132) described throughout this application and/or all, or a portion thereof, of the method illustrated in FIG. 2.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, the deduplicator (132) is implemented as a computing device (see e.g., FIG. 4). The computing device may be, for example, a laptop computer, a desktop computer, a server, a distributed computing system, or a cloud resource (e.g., a third-party storage system accessible via a wired or wireless connection). The computing device may include one or more processors, memory (e.g., random access memory), and persistent storage (e.g., disk drives, solid state drives, etc.). The computing device may include instructions, stored on the persistent storage, that when executed by the processor(s) of the computing device cause the computing device to perform the functionality of the deduplicator (132) described throughout this application and/or all, or a portion thereof, of the method illustrated in FIG. 2.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, the deduplicator (132) is implemented as a logical device. The logical device may utilize the computing resources of any number of computing devices and thereby provide the functionality of the deduplicator (132) described throughout this application and/or all, or a portion thereof, of the method illustrated in FIG. 2.


Continuing with the discussion of FIG. 1B, different data nodes in the cluster may include different quantities and/or types of computing resources, e.g., processors providing processing resources, memory providing memory resources, storages providing storage resources, communicators providing communications resources. Thus, the system may include a heterogeneous population of nodes.


The heterogeneous population of nodes may be logically divided into an accelerator pool (130) including nodes that have more computing resources, e.g., high performance nodes (134, 136) than other nodes and a non-accelerator pool (150) including nodes that have fewer computing resources, e.g., low performance nodes (154, 156) than the nodes in the accelerator pool (130). For example, nodes of the accelerator pool (130) may include enterprise class solid state storage resources that provide very high storage bandwidth, low latency, and high input-outputs per second (IOPS). In contrast, the nodes of the non-accelerator pool (150) may include hard disk drives that provide lower storage performance. While illustrated in FIG. 1B as being divided into two groups, the nodes may be divided into any number of groupings based on the relative performance level of each node without departing from the invention.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, the data nodes (134, 136, 154, 156) store data chunks and parity chunks. The data nodes (134, 136, 154, 156) may include persistent storage that may be used to store the data chunks and parity chunks. The generation of the data chunks and parity chunks is described below with respect to FIG. 2.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, the non-accelerator pool (150) includes any number of fault domains. In one or more embodiments of the invention, a fault domain is a logical grouping of nodes (e.g., data nodes) that, when one node of the logical grouping of nodes goes offline and/or otherwise becomes inaccessible, the other nodes in the logical grouping of nodes are directly affected. The effect of the node going offline to the other nodes may include the other nodes also going offline and/or otherwise inaccessible. The non-accelerator pool (150) may include multiple fault domains. In this manner, the events of one fault domain in the non-accelerator pool (150) may have no effect to other fault domains in the non-accelerator pool (150).


For example, two data nodes may be in a first fault domain. If one of these data nodes in the first fault domain experiences an unexpected shutdown, other nodes in the first fault domain may be affected. In contrast, another data node in the second fault domain may not be affected by the unexpected shutdown of a data node in the first fault domain. In one or more embodiments of the invention, the unexpected shutdown of one fault domain does not affect the nodes of other fault domains. In this manner, data may be replicated and stored across multiple fault domains to allow high availability of the data.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, each data node (134, 136, 154, 156) is implemented as a computing device (see e.g., FIG. 4). The computing device may be, for example, a laptop computer, a desktop computer, a server, a distributed computing system, or a cloud resource (e.g., a third-party storage system accessible via a wired or wireless connection). The computing device may include one or more processors, memory (e.g., random access memory), and persistent storage (e.g., disk drives, solid state drives, etc.). The computing device may include instructions, stored on the persistent storage, that when executed by the processor(s) of the computing device cause the computing device to perform the functionality of the data node (134, 136, 154, 156) described throughout this application and/or all, or a portion thereof, of the method illustrated in FIG. 2.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, the data nodes (134, 136, 154, 156) are implemented as a logical device. The logical device may utilize the computing resources of any number of computing devices and thereby provide the functionality of the data nodes (134, 136, 154, 156) described throughout this application and/or all, or a portion thereof, of the method illustrated in FIG. 2.



FIG. 2 shows a flowchart for storing data in a data cluster in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. The method shown in FIG. 2 may be performed by, for example, a deduplicator (132, FIG. 1B). Other components of the system illustrated in FIG. 1B may perform the method of FIG. 2 without departing from the invention. While the various steps in the flowchart are presented and described sequentially, one of ordinary skill in the relevant art will appreciate that some or all of the steps may be executed in different orders, may be combined or omitted, and some or all steps may be executed in parallel.


In step 200, data is obtained from a host. The data may be a file, a file segment, a collection of files, or any other type of data without departing from the invention. The data may be obtained in response to a request to store data and/or backup the data. Other requests may be used to initiate the method without departing from the invention.


In step 202, confirmation is sent to the host. In one or more embodiments of the invention, the confirmation is an acknowledgement (ACK) that confirms receipt of the data by the data cluster. At this stage, from the perspective of the host, the data has been backed up. This is the case even though data cluster is still performing the method shown in FIG. 2.


In step 204, an erasure coding procedure is performed on the data to generate data chunks and parity chunks. In one or more embodiments of the invention, the erasure coding procedure includes dividing the data of the obtained data into portions, referred to as data chunks. Each data chunk may include any number of data segments associated with the obtained data. The individual data chunks may then be combined (or otherwise grouped) into stripes (also referred to as Redundant Array of Independent Disks (RAID) stripes). One or more parity values are then calculated for each of the aforementioned stripes. The number of parity stripes may vary based on the erasure coding algorithm that is being used as part of the erasure coding procedure. Non-limiting examples of erasure coding algorithms are RAID-4, RAID-5, and RAID-6. Other erasing coding algorithms may be used without departing from the invention. Continuing with the above discussion, if the erasing code procedure is implementing RAID 4, then a single parity value is calculated. The resulting parity value is then stored in a parity chunk. If erasure coding procedure algorithm requires multiple parity values to be calculated, then the multiple parity values are calculated with each parity value being stored in a separate data chunk.


As discussed above, the data chunks are used to generate parity chunks in accordance with the erasure coding procedure. More specifically, the parity chunks may be generated by applying a predetermined function (e.g., P Parity function, Q Parity Function), operation, or calculation to at least one of the data chunks. Depending on the erasure coding procedure used, the parity chunks may include, but are not limited to, P parity values and/or Q parity values.


In one embodiment of the invention, the P parity value is a Reed-Solomon syndrome and, as such, the P Parity function may correspond to any function that can generate a Reed-Solomon syndrome. In one embodiment of the invention, the P parity function is an XOR function.


In one embodiment of the invention, the Q parity value is a Reed-Solomon syndrome and, as such, the Q Parity function may correspond to any function that can generate a Reed-Solomon syndrome. In one embodiment of the invention, a Q parity value is a Reed-Solomon code. In one embodiment of the invention, Q=g0·D0+g1·D1+g2D2+ . . . +gn-1·Dn-1, where Q corresponds to the Q parity, g is a generator of the field, and the value of D corresponds to the data in the data chunks.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, the number of data chunks and parity chunks generated is determined by the erasure coding procedure, which may be specified by the host, by the data cluster, and/or by another entity. In step 206, deduplication is performed on the data chunks to obtain deduplicated data chunks. In one or more embodiments of the invention, the deduplication is performed in the accelerator pool by identifying the data chunks of the obtained data and assigning a fingerprint to each data chunk. A fingerprint is a unique identifier (e.g., a D-ID) that may be stored in metadata of the data chunk. The deduplicator performing the deduplication may generate a fingerprint for a data chunk and identify whether the fingerprint matches an existing fingerprint stored in the deduplicator. If the fingerprint matches an existing fingerprint, the data chunk may be deleted, as it is already stored in the data cluster. If the fingerprint does not match any existing fingerprints, the data chunk may be stored as a deduplicated data chunk. Additionally, the fingerprint is stored in the deduplicator for deduplication purposes of future obtained data.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, the deduplicated data chunks collectively make up the deduplicated data. In one or more embodiments of the invention, the deduplicated data chunks are the data chunks that were not deleted during deduplication.


In step 208, the deduplicated data chunks and parity chunks are distributed across data nodes in a non-accelerator pool. The deduplicated data chunks and parity chunks may be sent to data nodes of the non-accelerator pool in the data cluster. The data nodes may store the respective deduplicated data chunks and parity chunks.


In one or more embodiments of the invention, each data node storing deduplicated data chunks and/or parity chunks of may be a node in a fault domain that is different from fault domains of the other data nodes storing deduplicated data. In this manner, the data chunks and parity chunks may be stored across multiple fault domains in the non-accelerated pool.


For example, consider a scenario in which the data cluster is implementing RAID 3 with a stripe that includes three data chunks and one parity chunk. Further, assume that all three data chunks, after deduplication has been performed, are to be stored in the non-accelerator pool. In this scenario, each of the data chunks (which are now considered deduplicated data chunks) and the parity chunk are stored in separate fault domains (i.e., on nodes within the separate fault domains).


Storing the data chunks and parity chunks in multiple fault domains may be for recovery purposes. In the event that one or more fault domains storing data chunks or parity chunks become inaccessible, the data chunks and/or parity chunks stored in the remaining fault domains may be used to recreate the inaccessible data. In one embodiment of the invention, the deduplicator (or other computing device or logical device) tracks the members of each stripe (i.e., which data chunks and which parity chunks are part of a stripe). This information may be used to aid in any recover operation that is required to be performed on the data stored in the data cluster.


In one embodiment of the invention, the data that is originally obtained in step 200 and/or the deduplicated chunks obtained in step 206 may be: (i) stored on a node in the accelerator pool for a finite period of time (e.g., until it is determined that this data is no longer required in the accelerator pool, where this determination may be made based on a policy); (ii) stored on a node in the accelerator pool until the end of the step 208 and then deleted from the accelerator pool.


EXAMPLE

The following section describes an example. The example is not intended to limit the invention. The example is illustrated in FIGS. 3A-3C. Turning to the example, consider a scenario in which a data cluster obtains two versions of host data from two different hosts at two points in time. The respective hosts may request the host data be stored in the data cluster in a 3:1 erasure coding scheme. FIG. 3A shows a diagram of the two versions at the two points in time. Host A data (300) may be obtained at a point in time T=1. Host A data (300) includes data that may be divided into data chunks A0 (302), A1 (304), and A2 (306). At a second point in time T=2, the data cluster obtains host B data (310) that includes data that may be divided into data chunks B0 (312), B1 (314), and B3 (316).


For purposes of this example assume that host A data (300) and host B data (310) are divided into the respective data chunks such that a fingerprint (i.e., a unique identifier) associated with data chunk A0 (312) of host B data (310) is identical to the fingerprint associated with data chunk A0 (302) of host A data (300). Similarly, the fingerprint associated with data chunk A1 (314) of host B data (310) is identical to the fingerprint associated with data chunk A1 (304) of host A data (300). In contrast, the fingerprint associated with data chunk A3 (316) of host B data (310) does not match a fingerprint of any previously stored data chunk. Finally, in this example, assume that the erasure coding process includes implementing RAID 4.



FIG. 3B shows the data cluster after host A data (300) is processed in accordance with FIG. 2. The data cluster may include an accelerator pool (320) that performs the method of FIG. 2 to generate deduplicated data A (322) using host A data (300). The method may include dividing the data into data chunks A0, A1, and A2, where these data chunks are associated with a first stripe. The aforementioned data chunks are then used to generate a parity chunk AP1 using RAID 3.


Because the deduplicated data A (322) is the first data stored in the data cluster, all three data chunks are distributed across nodes in the non-accelerator pool (330) as deduplicated data chunks (322A, 322B, 322C). Deduplicated data chunk A0 (322A) may be stored in a node A (332), deduplicated data chunk A1 (322B) may be stored in a node B (334), deduplicated data chunk A2 (322C) may be stored in a node C (336), and parity chunk AP1 (322D) may be stored in a node D (338). Each node (332, 334, 336, 338) may be a node in a unique fault domain. In this manner, each chunk (322A, 322B, 322C, 322D) is stored in a different fault domain.


At the second point in time T=2, host B data (310) is obtained by the accelerator pool (320). The host B data (310) may be divided into data chunks A0, A1, and A3, where these data chunks are associated with a second stripe. The data chunks in the second stripe are then used to generate a parity chunk AP2. The data chunks in the second stripe are then deduplicated by the deduplicator. The result of the deduplication of the second stripe is that data chunks A0 and A1 exist in the non-accelerator pool and thus are deleted from the host B data (310).


The remaining data chunks associated with deduplicated data B (324), i.e., deduplicated data chunk A3 (324B), may be stored in nodes of the non-accelerator pool (330). The parity chunk AP2 (324A) may be stored in node A (332), and deduplicated data chunk A3 (324B) may be stored in node C (336). FIG. 3C shows the data cluster after the deduplicated data chunks associated with host B data (310) along with the parity chunk AP2 (324A) are stored in the non-accelerator pool (330).


End of Example

As discussed above, embodiments of the invention may be implemented using computing devices. FIG. 4 shows a diagram of a computing device in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. The computing device (400) may include one or more computer processors (402), non-persistent storage (404) (e.g., volatile memory, such as random access memory (RAM), cache memory), persistent storage (406) (e.g., a hard disk, an optical drive such as a compact disk (CD) drive or digital versatile disk (DVD) drive, a flash memory, etc.), a communication interface (412) (e.g., Bluetooth interface, infrared interface, network interface, optical interface, etc.), input devices (410), output devices (408), and numerous other elements (not shown) and functionalities. Each of these components is described below.


In one embodiment of the invention, the computer processor(s) (402) may be an integrated circuit for processing instructions. For example, the computer processor(s) may be one or more cores or micro-cores of a processor. The computing device (400) may also include one or more input devices (410), such as a touchscreen, keyboard, mouse, microphone, touchpad, electronic pen, or any other type of input device. Further, the communication interface (412) may include an integrated circuit for connecting the computing device (400) to a network (not shown) (e.g., a local area network (LAN), a wide area network (WAN) such as the Internet, mobile network, or any other type of network) and/or to another device, such as another computing device.


In one embodiment of the invention, the computing device (400) may include one or more output devices (408), such as a screen (e.g., a liquid crystal display (LCD), a plasma display, touchscreen, cathode ray tube (CRT) monitor, projector, or other display device), a printer, external storage, or any other output device. One or more of the output devices may be the same or different from the input device(s). The input and output device(s) may be locally or remotely connected to the computer processor(s) (402), non-persistent storage (404), and persistent storage (406). Many different types of computing devices exist, and the aforementioned input and output device(s) may take other forms.


One or more embodiments of the invention may be implemented using instructions executed by one or more processors of the data management device. Further, such instructions may correspond to computer readable instructions that are stored on one or more non-transitory computer readable mediums.


One or more embodiments of the invention may improve the operation of one or more computing devices. More specifically, embodiments of the invention improve the efficiency of performing storage operations in a data cluster. The efficiency is improved by implementing erasure coding procedures and performing deduplication on data and/or backups of data. The erasure coding procedure includes generating parity data associated with the data. The deduplicated data and the parity data may be stored across multiple fault domains. In this manner, if any number of fault domains become inaccessible prior to recovery of data, portions of data stored in the remaining fault domains may be used to recreate the data. This method may replace the need to mirror (i.e., store multiple copies of) the data across the fault domains, thus reducing the amount of storage used for storing data while maintaining policies in the event of fault domain failures.


Further, embodiments of the invention improve the deduplication by upgrading the nodes performing a deduplication which increases processing capabilities of the node and reduces processing time compared to non-upgraded nodes performing the deduplication.


Thus, embodiments of the invention may address the problem of inefficient use of computing resources. This problem arises due to the technological nature of the environment in which storage operations are performed.


The problems discussed above should be understood as being examples of problems solved by embodiments of the invention disclosed herein and the invention should not be limited to solving the same/similar problems. The disclosed invention is broadly applicable to address a range of problems beyond those discussed herein.


While the invention has been described above with respect to a limited number of embodiments, those skilled in the art, having the benefit of this disclosure, will appreciate that other embodiments can be devised which do not depart from the scope of the invention as disclosed herein. Accordingly, the scope of the invention should be limited only by the attached claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method for storing data, the method comprising: obtaining data;applying an erasure coding procedure to the data to obtain a plurality of data chunks and at least one parity chunk;deduplicating the plurality of data chunks to obtain a plurality of deduplicated data chunks, wherein deduplicating the plurality of data chunks to obtain the plurality of deduplicated data chunks is performed after a parity value for the plurality of data chunks is generated by performing an erasure coding procedure; andstoring, across a plurality of nodes, the plurality of deduplicated data chunks and the at least one parity chunk.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the erasure coding procedure is applied by a deduplicator executing on a node in an accelerator pool, wherein the plurality of nodes is located is a non-accelerator pool, and wherein a data cluster comprises the accelerator pool and the non-accelerator pool.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, wherein applying the erasure coding procedure comprises: dividing the data into data chunks;selecting, from the data chunks, the plurality of data chunks; andgenerating the at least one the parity chunk using the plurality of data chunks.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one parity chunk comprises a P parity value.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, wherein the at least one parity chunk comprises a first parity chunk comprising a P parity value and a second parity chunk comprising a Q parity value.
  • 6. The method of claim 1, wherein each of the plurality of nodes is in a separate fault domain.
  • 7. A non-transitory computer readable medium comprising computer readable program code, which when executed by a computer processor enables the computer processor to perform a method for storing, the method comprising: obtaining data;applying an erasure coding procedure to the data to obtain a plurality of data chunks and at least one parity chunk;deduplicating the plurality of data chunks to obtain a plurality of deduplicated data chunks, wherein deduplicating the plurality of data chunks to obtain the plurality of deduplicated data chunks is performed after a parity value for the plurality of data chunks is generated by performing an erasure coding procedure; andstoring, across a plurality of nodes, the plurality of deduplicated data chunks and the at least one parity chunk.
  • 8. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 7, wherein the erasure coding procedure is applied by a deduplicator executing on a node in an accelerator pool, wherein the plurality of nodes is located is a non-accelerator pool, and wherein a data cluster comprises the accelerator pool and the non-accelerator pool.
  • 9. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 7, wherein applying the erasure coding procedure comprises: dividing the data into data chunks;selecting, from the data chunks, the plurality of data chunks; andgenerating the at least one the parity chunk using the plurality of data chunks.
  • 10. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 7, wherein the at least one parity chunk comprises a P parity value.
  • 11. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 7, wherein the at least one parity chunk comprises a first parity chunk comprising a P parity value and a second parity chunk comprising a Q parity value.
  • 12. The non-transitory computer readable medium of claim 7, wherein each of the plurality of nodes is in a separate fault domain.
  • 13. A data cluster, comprising: a plurality of data nodes comprising an accelerator pool and a non-accelerator pool, wherein the accelerator pool comprises a data node, and the non-accelerator pool comprises a plurality of data nodes;wherein the data node of the plurality of data nodes is programmed to: obtain data;apply an erasure coding procedure to the data to obtain a plurality of data chunks and at least one parity chunk;deduplicate the plurality of data chunks to obtain a plurality of deduplicated data chunks, wherein deduplicating the plurality of data chunks to obtain the plurality of deduplicated data chunks is performed after a parity value for the plurality of data chunks is generated by performing an erasure coding procedure; andstore, across the plurality of nodes, the plurality of deduplicated data chunks and the at least one parity chunk.
  • 14. The data cluster of claim 13, wherein applying the erasure coding procedure comprises: dividing the data into data chunks;selecting, from the data chunks, the plurality of data chunks; andgenerating the at least one the parity chunk using the plurality of data chunks.
  • 15. The data cluster of claim 13, wherein the at least one parity chunk comprises a P parity value.
  • 16. The data cluster of claim 13, wherein the at least one parity chunk comprises a first parity chunk comprising a P parity value and a second parity chunk comprising a Q parity value.
  • 17. The data cluster of claim 13, wherein each of the plurality of nodes is in a separate fault domain.
US Referenced Citations (155)
Number Name Date Kind
4780809 Woffinden et al. Oct 1988 A
5689678 Stallmo et al. Nov 1997 A
6098098 Sandahi et al. Aug 2000 A
6223252 Bandera et al. Apr 2001 B1
6516425 Belhadj et al. Feb 2003 B1
7636814 Karr et al. Dec 2009 B1
7882386 Potnis et al. Feb 2011 B1
7987353 Holdaway et al. Jul 2011 B2
8037345 Iyer et al. Oct 2011 B1
8099571 Driscoll et al. Jan 2012 B1
8161255 Anglin et al. Apr 2012 B2
8190835 Yueh May 2012 B1
8364917 Bricker et al. Jan 2013 B2
8386930 Dillenberger et al. Feb 2013 B2
8583769 Peters et al. Nov 2013 B1
8788466 Anglin et al. Jul 2014 B2
8868987 Wagner Oct 2014 B2
8874892 Chan et al. Oct 2014 B1
8898114 Feathergill et al. Nov 2014 B1
8949208 Xu et al. Feb 2015 B1
9122501 Hsu et al. Sep 2015 B1
9201751 Muthirisavenugopal et al. Dec 2015 B1
9256378 Zheng et al. Feb 2016 B2
9256381 Fultz et al. Feb 2016 B1
9278481 Hull Mar 2016 B2
9355036 Beard et al. May 2016 B2
9521198 Agarwala et al. Dec 2016 B1
9696939 Frank et al. Jul 2017 B1
9710367 Nagineni Jul 2017 B1
9749480 Katano Aug 2017 B1
9792316 Cremelie Oct 2017 B1
9830111 Patiejunas et al. Nov 2017 B1
9898224 Marshak et al. Feb 2018 B1
10002048 Chennamsetty et al. Jun 2018 B2
10013323 Puhov et al. Jul 2018 B1
10013325 Garrett, Jr. et al. Jul 2018 B1
10031672 Wang et al. Jul 2018 B2
10057184 Prahlad et al. Aug 2018 B1
10091295 Savic et al. Oct 2018 B1
10097620 Reddy et al. Oct 2018 B2
10152254 Kang et al. Dec 2018 B1
10185624 Akutsu et al. Jan 2019 B2
10241695 Baptist et al. Mar 2019 B2
10339455 Parush-Tzur et al. Jul 2019 B1
10409778 Zhao et al. Sep 2019 B1
10452301 Farhan Oct 2019 B1
10503413 Gal et al. Dec 2019 B1
10503611 Srivastav et al. Dec 2019 B1
10528429 Vempati et al. Jan 2020 B1
10817392 Mcauliffe et al. Oct 2020 B1
10929256 Danilov et al. Feb 2021 B2
10956601 Surla et al. Mar 2021 B2
10963345 Patel et al. Mar 2021 B2
10990480 Bernat et al. Apr 2021 B1
11005468 Subramanian et al. May 2021 B1
11112990 Bernat et al. Sep 2021 B1
20010044879 Moulton et al. Nov 2001 A1
20030036882 Harper et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030058277 Bowman-Amuah Mar 2003 A1
20030065873 Collins et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030172145 Nguyen Sep 2003 A1
20030177205 Liang et al. Sep 2003 A1
20040128587 Kenchammana-Hosekote et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040153844 Ghose et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040260967 Guha et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050076049 Qubti et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050086557 Sato et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050182797 Adkins et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050262385 Mcneill et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050283655 Ashmore Dec 2005 A1
20070214255 Spitz et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070283011 Rakowski et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080244204 Cremelie et al. Oct 2008 A1
20090077165 Rhodes et al. Mar 2009 A1
20090094250 Dhuse et al. Apr 2009 A1
20090235022 Bates et al. Sep 2009 A1
20090265360 Bachwani et al. Oct 2009 A1
20100061207 Trantham Mar 2010 A1
20100138604 Noguchi et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110099351 Condict Apr 2011 A1
20110173484 Schuette et al. Jul 2011 A1
20110197024 Thomas Aug 2011 A1
20110246597 Swanson et al. Oct 2011 A1
20120096309 Kumar et al. Apr 2012 A1
20130047029 Ikeuchi et al. Feb 2013 A1
20130067459 Sannidhanam et al. Mar 2013 A1
20130086006 Colgrove Apr 2013 A1
20130151683 Jain et al. Jun 2013 A1
20130339818 Baker et al. Dec 2013 A1
20140020083 Fetik Jan 2014 A1
20140032834 Cudak et al. Jan 2014 A1
20140059311 Oberhofer et al. Feb 2014 A1
20140089265 Talagala et al. Mar 2014 A1
20140089630 Pignatelli Mar 2014 A1
20140285917 Cudak et al. Sep 2014 A1
20140297603 Kim et al. Oct 2014 A1
20150012775 Cudak et al. Jan 2015 A1
20150046756 Sreekumaran et al. Feb 2015 A1
20150058582 Baldwin Feb 2015 A1
20150095596 Yang Apr 2015 A1
20150161000 Kim et al. Jun 2015 A1
20150205657 Clark Jul 2015 A1
20150205669 Sundaram et al. Jul 2015 A1
20150220400 Resch et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150227602 Ramu et al. Aug 2015 A1
20150286545 Brown Oct 2015 A1
20150355980 Volvovski et al. Dec 2015 A1
20160013988 Andrews Jan 2016 A1
20160062674 Benight et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160070652 Sundararaman et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160077933 Ventura et al. Mar 2016 A1
20160085630 Gardner Mar 2016 A1
20160246537 Kim Aug 2016 A1
20170090767 Poston et al. Mar 2017 A1
20170099187 Dale et al. Apr 2017 A1
20170147437 Bodick et al. May 2017 A1
20170160983 Fiske et al. Jun 2017 A1
20170192865 Pan Jul 2017 A1
20170192868 Vijayan et al. Jul 2017 A1
20170206034 Fetik Jul 2017 A1
20170235609 Wires et al. Aug 2017 A1
20170308536 Azzam et al. Oct 2017 A1
20180018227 Kazi Jan 2018 A1
20180018235 Arslan et al. Jan 2018 A1
20180060894 Beveridge et al. Mar 2018 A1
20180157532 Kumar et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180165169 Camp et al. Jun 2018 A1
20180189109 Nagai et al. Jul 2018 A1
20180217898 Tormasov Aug 2018 A1
20180260123 Andresen et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180278597 Helms et al. Sep 2018 A1
20180284987 Lazier Oct 2018 A1
20180307560 Vishnumolakala et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180370756 Vishnumolakala et al. Oct 2018 A1
20180314607 Deshpande et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180322558 Padmanabh et al. Nov 2018 A1
20180356998 Wu et al. Dec 2018 A1
20190050263 Patel et al. Feb 2019 A1
20190104398 Owen et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190108099 Mazumdar Apr 2019 A1
20190109772 Lipstone et al. Apr 2019 A1
20190197023 Chennamsetty et al. Jun 2019 A1
20190332473 Yang et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190332502 Ma et al. Oct 2019 A1
20190361850 Uno et al. Nov 2019 A1
20190379588 Rao Dec 2019 A1
20200026439 Gao et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200034257 Mahmood et al. Jan 2020 A1
20200042388 Roberts Feb 2020 A1
20200050689 Tal et al. Feb 2020 A1
20200065191 Zhou Feb 2020 A1
20200133503 Sun et al. Apr 2020 A1
20200175038 Guan et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200201837 Motwani et al. Jun 2020 A1
20200257457 Matsugami Aug 2020 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
2015114643 Aug 2015 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
“Features—RoboHead”; Project Management Software for Marketing & Creative Teams, Aquent; 2018 (https://www.robohead.net/features) (2 pages).
“Make more time for the work that matters most”; Asana, Inc.; 2017 (https://asana.com/) (7 pages).
“Online Project Management Tools & Features”; ProWorkflow; Jun. 2015 (https://www.proworkflow.com/features-project-management-tools/) (7 pages).
Extended European Search Report issued in corresponding European Application No. 2152194.5, dated Jun. 29, 2020 (10 pages).
Extended European Search Report issued in corresponding European Application No. 20152195.2, dated Jun. 2, 2020 (6 pages).
Suzhen Wu et al. ;“Improving Reliability of Deduplication-based Storage Systems with Per-File Parity”; 2018 IEEE 37th International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS); Salvador, Brazil; 2018; pp. 171-180 (DOI:10.1109/SRDS.2018.00028) (10 pages).
Extended European Search Report issued in corresponding European App. No. 20152195.2, dated Jun. 2, 2020.
Wu, Suzhen, et al., “Improving Reliability of Deduplication-based Storage Systems with Per-File Parity,” 2018 IEEE 37th International Symposium on Reliable Distributed Systems (SRDS); Salvador, Brazil; 2018, pp. 171-180 (DOI:10.1109/SRDS.2018.00028).
“Make more time for the work that matters most”, Asana, Inc., 2017 (https://asana.com/), 5 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20210072912 A1 Mar 2021 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 16260734 Jan 2019 US
Child 17100178 US