The present invention relates to magnetic recording and, more particularly, to a method and system for magnetic recording that utilizes a magnetic recording media having self-organized magnetic nanoparticles.
In the field of magnetic recording, areal density is an important factor driving the design of future magnetic recording systems. Increased storage capacity in magnetic recording has traditionally been addressed through improvements in the ability to store information on a particular storage disc having an increased areal density. Conventional longitudinal and proposed perpendicular recording schemes have been projected to include areal densities of about 1 Tbpsi, but will require extensive modifications to allow further growth.
Accordingly, much attention has been directed toward either improving the various components of a conventional magnetic recording system or developing new types of magnetic recording systems. For example, self-organized magnetic arrays of nanoparticles have been produced and investigated for use as magnetic recording media for future ultra-high density magnetic recording applications. These nanoparticles may provide conceivable solutions to many proposed future recording schemes, e.g., conventional granular media, perpendicular media, thermally assisted recording media, patterned media recording schemes and probe storage systems. While much effort has been directed toward the various potential applications of the self-organized magnetic nanoparticles for use in magnetic recording media, much more effort is needed for incorporating such proposed media into an entire magnetic recording system for performing read and/or write operations.
There is identified, therefore, a need for improved magnetic recording systems that overcome limitations, disadvantages, or shortcomings of known magnetic recording systems.
An aspect of the present invention is to provide a method of magnetic recording that comprises depositing surfactant coated nanoparticles on a substrate, wherein the surfactant coated nanoparticles represent first bits of recorded information. The method also includes removing the surfactant coating from selected of the surfactant coated nanoparticles. The selected nanoparticles with their surfactant coating removed may then be designated to represent second bits of recorded information. The surfactant coated nanoparticles have a first saturation magnetic moment and the selected nanoparticles with the surfactant coating removed have a second saturation magnetic moment. Therefore, by selectively removing the surfactant coating from certain nanoparticles, a write operation for recording the first and second bits of information may be performed. A read operation may be carried out by detecting the different magnetic moments of the surfactant coated nanoparticles and the non-surfactant coated nanoparticles.
Another aspect of the present invention is to provide a magnetic recording system that comprises a recording medium having a substrate with surfactant coated nanoparticles and non-surfactant coated nanoparticles. The surfactant coated nanoparticles represent first bits of recorded information and the non-surfactant coated nanoparticles represent second bits of recorded information. The magnetic recording system also comprises means for writing the first and second bits of recorded information and means for reading the first and second bits of recorded information.
A further aspect of the present invention is to provide a method of magnetic recording that comprises depositing a layer of self-organized magnetic nanoparticles on a substrate. The method also includes altering a magnetic property magnitude of selected of the self-organized magnetic nanoparticles and designating bits of recorded information according to the magnetic property magnitude of either the self-organized magnetic nanoparticles or the magnetic property magnitude of the selected self-organized magnetic nanoparticles that were altered.
These and other aspects of the present invention will be more apparent from the following description.
a) is a transmission electron microscope (TEM) image of an FePt nanoparticle sample.
b) is a graphical illustration of particle diameter distribution for the FePt nanoparticles illustrated in
a) is a graphical illustration of weight loss rate for a surfactant coating material.
b) is a graphical illustration of weight loss rate for a FePt nanoparticle solution deposited onto a silicon wafer and measured by a thermogravimetric analyzer (TGA).
The invention relates to magnetic recording and, more particularly, to a method and system for magnetic recording that utilizes a magnetic recording media having self-organized magnetic nanoparticles. The invention includes altering a magnetic property magnitude, such as saturation magnetic moment or other magnetic properties of the nanoparticles, of the self-organized magnetic nanoparticles and distinguishing between the unaltered and altered nanoparticles for purposes of recording bits of information.
The layer of nanoparticles 18 may be deposited on the substrate 16 using, for example, dip-coating where the substrate 16 is submerged in a liquid containing the nanoparticles 18 and subsequently controllably extracted. Alternatively, a spin-coating process may be used where a nanoparticles-containing fluid is applied to the surface of the substrate 16 followed by a controlled spinning of the substrate 16 to remove excess materials.
Referring to
The writing process utilizing the write element 24 generally involves the local removal of the surfactant coating or shell 22 from individual nanoparticles 18. Each nanoparticle 18, as deposited on the substrate 16, has a first saturation magnetic moment. By turning on the electron current 30, the shell 22 surrounding the core 20 of an individual nanoparticle 18 will dissolve locally leaving behind only the core portion 20. This results in a non-surfactant coated nanoparticle 20 that has a second saturation magnetic moment that is greater than the first saturation magnetic moment of the original nanoparticle 18. The details regarding local removal of the surfactant coating or shell 22 of the nanoparticle 18 in order to alter the saturation magnetic moment thereof will be described in more detail herein.
Accordingly, it will be appreciated that the original nanoparticles 18 may each be designated to represent a first bit of recorded information in the magnetic recording system 10. In addition, the non-surfactant coated nanoparticles 20 having a second saturation magnetic moment may be designated to represent second bits of recorded information for the magnetic recording system 10.
In other embodiments of the invention, the write element 24 may include, for example, a localized heat source, such as a focused laser spot or a near field optical spot for locally removing the surfactant coating or shell 22 from selected nanoparticles 18.
Referring to
Still referring to
In another embodiment, the read element 26 rather than utilizing the described magnetic polarizing field, may employ a time varying field using a coil or microscopic electromagnet. The alternating field will polarize the nanoparticles, such as nanoparticles 18 and 20 and provide a read-back signal to the read element 26. The information can be retrieved by demodulation of the signal in the read element 26. It will be appreciated that other configurations may be employed to provide a read operation by detecting the saturation magnetic moment of the individual nanoparticles or by detecting other variable magnetic properties of the nanoparticles as well.
Further details regarding the theory of operation of the recording head 12 illustrated in
M=Nm[coth(μ0mH/kBT)−kBT/μ0mH]
where μ0=4π10−7 is the permeability of vacuum, N is the number of nano-particles per volume, and m is the net moment of the nano-particle. For the case of (μ0mH/kBT)=1, the relative moment (normalized to the full moment of the nano-particle) can be written as:
|M/Nm|=μ0mH/3kBT
or as the initial magnetic susceptibility χ
χ=M/H=Nμ0m2/3kBT
Note that χ has a quadratic dependence on the moment m of the individual nano-particles. Therefore, a change MS will correspond to a larger change in the observed read-back signal, which is proportional to χH.
For a typical nano-particle with a diameter d=4 nm and a saturation magnetization of Ms=800 emu/cm3, the moment mmod=(π/6) d3Ms=26.8 10−18 emu. For the same nano-particles the measured value was Ms=200 emu/cm3 in the as-prepared state, which would correspond to mini=6.7 10−18 emu for a 4-nm-diameter nano-particle.
The (maximum) applied magnetic field is chosen such that μ0mH/kBT=1 for the modified nano-particles. In the present example and using T=300 K, this results in a relatively easy to achieve field of H=123 kA/m (=1.54 kOe). The moment that will be sensed by the read-back device is Mmod=0.313 mmod=8.39 10−18 emu (per nano-particle). For the non-modified nano-particles, this moment is Mini=0.083 mini=0.56 10−18 emu (per nano-particle). The contrast ratio is (Mmod−Mini)/Mini100%=1400%.
Note that present read-back devices are designed to be sensitive to moments of the order of Mpresent=1.55 10−15 emu (taking 10% of the volume of a bit-cell with an area A=2,581 nm2 [corresponding to a bit-density of 250 Gbit/in2], a thickness t=10 nm, and an Ms=600 emu/cm3), which is 185 times larger than for the signal of a single modified nano-particle. Assuming that the full positive to negative swing of a present medium corresponds to a signal-amplitude of 5 mV, the paramagnetic signal would correspond to a signal-amplitude of 13 μV (or 9 μVrms for ac detection.
The following example explains in detail the concept of removing a surfactant coating from an as deposited nanoparticle structure and, particularly for self-assembled, monodisperse L10 FePt nanoparticles for forming a magnetic data storage media, such as magnetic recording medium 14. The chemically ordered L10 phase of the FePt system is of particular interest, because of its high bulk magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy density (Ku˜6.6×107 ergs/cm3) at the equiatomic composition that should allow the use of smaller, thermally stable magnetic grains than is generally used in current recording media.
In one embodiment of the present invention, there is provided a magnetic recording system that alters and detects saturation magnetic moment for recording information. Thus, this example concentrates on the saturation magnetization, MS. In Fe50Pt50 thin films, MS is about 1125 emu/cm3, close to the bulk value MS=1140 emu/cm3. Techniques for these measurements are well established. In chemically synthesized, surfactant-coated FePt nanoparticle systems, however, quantitative Ms measurements are complicated by the difficulty of determining weights or volumes without introducing large errors. We provide a systematic study of MS of FePt nanoparticle systems at different annealing temperatures and constant annealing time (30 minutes). The amount of the material is characterized by weighing the FePt nanoparticles (˜1 mg with 0.1 μg accuracy) after the surfactant coating decomposes at temperatures T≧400° C.
The present assemblies of FePt nanoparticles are synthesized using techniques that are known. Thermally oxidized silicon coupons are used as substrates.
In order to characterize the total mass of the FePt nanoparticles, a Thermogravimetric Analyzer (TGA) is used to measure the weight and to monitor the weight change of the FePt nanoparticles/surfactant systems as function of annealing temperature. The TGA used is a TA Instrument (TGA-2950) with 0.1 μg weight resolution. Since the range of the FePt solution weight used for magnetization measurements is from 0.5 mg˜3 mg, the error bar due to instrument resolution is negligible. The sample is placed on a Pt sample pan in the TGA chamber and is then heated to temperatures up to 650° C. at controlled scan rate up to 10° C./min. Nitrogen gas is flushed through the TGA chamber to remove oxygen. The weight change is monitored in-situ during heating.
The example first investigates a surfactant-only sample. A few drops (about 16 mg) of the oleyl acid/oleylamine 50:50 surfactant mixture are put directly into the sample pan. The measured weight starts dropping at about 150° C. indicating the onset of surfactant decomposition. A modest weight reduction in the range 150 to 300° C. is followed by a more dramatic drop above 300° C., reaching zero at about 400° C. (shown in
b) shows the TGA weight-loss observed for a FePt nanoparticle film deposited on a silicon wafer. The total initial weight of the solution is about 0.6 mg. The temperature trace is very similar to that of the pure surfactant with major weight-loss occurring near 350° C. and a weak shoulder observable near 250° C. Both features can be attributed to the decomposition (or evaporation) of the surfactant. After heating to T≧400° C., the weight has stabilized. This suggests that the weight left behind after annealing at Tanneal≧400° C., which is about 50% of the initial weight, is attributable to FePt nanoparticles. The example also studied bare silicon substrates and found weak weight-loss of less than ˜0.4% of the silicon weight, which is attributed to evaporation of moisture (water). This weak weight-loss from the silicon substrate is taken into account in quantifying the weight of FePt, assuming that it behaves in a consistent manner from sample to sample. The maximum possible error resulting from this assumption is about ±5%.
The coercivity HC increases from less than 200 Oe for the as-prepared sample to 22 kOe for the sample annealed at Tanneal=650° C., a sharp onset of coercivity occurring near 350° C. For Tanneal≧450° C., the magnetization at 50 kOe is about 850 emu/cm3, 25% lower than the Ms of bulk FePt. This discrepancy could partly be due to the fact that at 50 kOe magnetic field, the sample is not yet fully saturated. However, for the sample annealed at Tanneal≦450° C., the magnetization is significantly reduced. The as-prepared sample has a magnetization of only about 210 emu/cm3, 19% of the bulk value for FePt. The critical annealing temperature to cause a significant increase of the saturation magnetization is about 450° C., which is consistent with the surfactant decomposition temperature. The annealing temperature dependence of the magnetization, along with the weight reduction for these RTA annealed samples is shown in the inset to
The present findings are interpreted as due to the presence of strong interactions between the surfactant and the nanoparticle surface in the as-prepared state. Preliminary density functional calculations indicate that these surface bonding interactions take place predominately at surface iron sites, which is the primary contributor to the magnetization in FePt. The mechanism of bonding to the nanoparticle surface depends on many parameters; however, surface geometry and electronic structure are perhaps the most important factors which determine the location and strength of the surface bond. Metal surfaces containing available d-bands are known to interact with small molecules having accessible π* states through a Blyholder type interaction. For example, this interaction in carbonyl-based molecules weakens the C—O bond through charge donation from the metal d-band into this unoccupied anti-bonding state, thereby weakening the bond. Preliminary spin polarized density functional theory results from cluster models of the FePt(111) surface, which include a small molecule model of the oleylamine surfactant, show that charge is transferred to the surface Fe site from the model oleylamine, thereby lowering the atomic magnetization by about 60% at the Fe site, which is consistent with the previously described bonding mechanism and the observed decrease in magnetization of the nano-particles described above.
On increasing the annealing temperature to 400° C., the surfactant starts to decompose and leaves the particle surface, breaking the bonding between the surfactant and the particles. Without the dead layer from the surfactant—particle interaction, the nanoparticle system recovers its full magnetization.
It is well established that the “magnetic” particle size can be estimated by fitting to the Langevin function in the superparamagnetic regime. The Zero-Field-Cooled (ZFC) and Field-Cooled (FC) magnetization curves show a blocking temperature TB=12K for as-prepared FePt samples in a magnetic field of 200 Oe. In order to estimate the particle size from the Langevin function, the magnetic field dependence of the magnetization curve is measured at T>TB. In this case, T=30K is used (shown in
where χi is the initial susceptibility of the magnetization curve (χi=6.5×10−6 emu/Oe for this particular case) and ms is the saturation magnetic moment (in units of emu). In order to extrapolate ms, the magnetic moment m is plotted against 1/H. For superparamagnetic materials, the relationship between m and 1/H for large field should be linear with m=mS at 1/H→0 and m=0 at 1/H=1/H0. The inset to
In conclusion of this example, it is observed that a 75% magnetization reduction for as-prepared FePt nanoparticle samples in comparison with the samples annealed at high temperatures. The strong correlation between magnetization recovery temperature (≧400° C.) and surfactant decomposition temperature (350° C.˜400° C.) suggests that the chemical interaction between Fe and surfactant at the particle is responsible for this dramatic magnetization reduction. A Langevin function analysis for as-prepared FePt particles suggests a core-shell structure of the 2.7 nm diameter FePt particles with a 0.5 nm non-magnetic shell.
Whereas particular embodiments of this invention have been described above for purposes of illustration, it will be evident to those skilled in the art that numerous variations of the details of the present invention may be made without departing from the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4805145 | Umemura | Feb 1989 | A |
5298760 | Fuchs et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5740101 | Fuchs et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
6162532 | Black et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6262129 | Murray et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6302940 | Murray et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
20020132083 | Weller et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20040071924 | Yang et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050009079 | Anders et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 977 812 | Feb 2002 | EP |
0 977 812 | Feb 2002 | EP |
1 226 878 | Jul 2002 | EP |
1 226 878 | Jul 2002 | EP |
2 773 632 | Jul 1999 | FR |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050078397 A1 | Apr 2005 | US |