Regulations and established rules dictate how financial instrument market centers, including securities market centers, must interact with one another and, specifically, how orders are to be handled among market centers. Some present market center rules and regulations for some markets dictate that when an order is placed on a market center, it is to be executed at the best bid or offer price presently available in the entire market (“Market Best Bid” or “Market Best Offer”), regardless of whether the market center that the order was sent to is presently offering the best bid or best offer price. If a market center receives an incoming marketable order (i.e. an order whose price is at or better than the opposite side Market Best Bid or Best Offer price) and cannot match that order within its own order book, then that market center must route all or part of the order to the market center then presently posting the Market Best Bid or Best Offer price.
While these rules and regulations are designed to give a securities trader the benefit of having his order executed at the best price available in the market at the time, traders sometimes want their orders only executed on the market center to which they sent the order, trading off speed of execution versus best price. These traders do not want their orders to leave the market center to which it was sent. Traders can make this request as long as their order does not lock or cross the away market. A trader's order would lock the away market if the trader's order price has the same price as the Market Best Bid or Best Offer price then available on the opposing side of the market (i.e. the trader's buy order price is equal to the Market Best Offer price or the trader's sell price is equal to the Market Best Bid price). A trader's order price would cross the away market if a trader's buy order price is higher than the Market Best Offer price or if a trader's sell order price is lower than the Market Best Bid price.
In prior systems, if a trader's market center-restricted order locked or crossed the away market, it was typically canceled. Traders in such systems typically had to choose between pricing an order aggressively to maximize trading opportunities or risk having the order cancelled because the trader had priced it through the market (i.e. priced it so that it would lock or cross the away market).
Accordingly, there is a need for a market center order processing method and system where a trader can designate that an order only execute on a specific market center and that order will only re-price more aggressively than its current posted price and not fade from its current posted price as prices on an away market move to or through it.
According to an aspect of the present invention, a method for processing an incoming market center-restricted order includes providing a posting market center having a public order book and providing a tick back increment. It further includes receiving a market center-restricted order specifying a financial instrument and a price and retrieving an away market best price in the specified financial instrument. It further includes determining whether the price of the market center-restricted order locks or crosses the best away market price, such that when the price of the market restricted order locks or crosses the best away market price, a ticked back price parameter is computed based on the away market best price and the tick back increment and where the computed ticked back price parameter is displayed as the market center-restricted order price on the posting market center public order book. The method further includes retrieving an updated away market best price, where the updated away market best price has moved to or through the price displayed for the market center-restricted order such that the updated away market best price locks or crosses the posting market center public order book and maintaining the price displayed for the market center-restricted order in the posting market center public order book.
These and other features, aspects and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following description, appended claims and accompanying drawings where:
Referring to
The posting market center 20 may also include a quote and last sale interface 23 that interacts with the away market centers 24 to capture quote and last sale information. This information is stored to a best bids and offers data structure 25. This data structure 25 is where the Market Best Bid and Offer information is stored. The posting market center 20 may also include an order and trade parameters data structure 27. The order and trade parameters data structure 27 stores pre-defined trading parameters and rules that are used by the order matching engine 21 in matching orders and executing trades. The posting market center 20 may also include an order and execution interface 28 which interacts with the traders 26, the away market centers 24 and the order matching engine 21 in the order execution process. The posting market center 20 may also include an order information data structure 29 where order information is stored and a trade information data structure 30 where completed trade information is stored.
Throughout the discussion herein, it should be understood that the details regarding the operating environment, data structures, and other technological elements surrounding the posting market center 20 are by way of example and that the present invention may be implemented in various differing forms. For example, the data structures referred to herein may be implemented using any appropriate structure, data storage, or retrieval methodology (e.g., local or remote data storage in data bases, tables, internal arrays, etc.). Furthermore, a market center of the type described herein may support any type of suitable interface on any suitable computer system.
Incoming Market Center-Restricted Buy Order
At step 112, the process retrieves the away market best offer price from data structure 25. At step 114, the away market best offer price is checked to see if it is higher than the buy order price. If the away market best offer price is higher than the buy order price, then the restricted buy order will not lock or cross the away market. The process proceeds to step 116 where a parameter, in this example named TickBack, is set to “N”. Setting TickBack equal to “N” means that the process, as indicated at step 122, inserts the buy order in the posting market center's internal book and displays it on the public order book according to normal price/time priority rules for limit orders because the buy order does not lock or cross the away market.
Referring back to step 114, if the process determines that away market best offer price is not higher than the buy order price (i.e. the away market best offer price is equal to or less than the buy order price), then the posting of this order on the posting market center 20 would lock or cross the away market. The process, in this instance, acts to protect the away market centers 24 while not canceling the order, as would have been done with prior systems. The process proceeds to step 123 where the process sets the “Top Price” parameter equal to the price set in the incoming buy order. The Top Price parameter sets the highest possible price that the process will possibly set the order at when pegging it to the away market best offer price. Next, at step 124, the process computes a tick back price parameter (“Tick Back Price”). The tick back price parameter in this embodiment is equal to the away market best offer price minus one trade increment (i.e. a tick). At step 126, the process sets the tick back parameter (“Tick Back”) to “Y” so the system knows for later checks that the order price has been ticked back. At step 128, the process sets a display price parameter (“Display Price”) equal to the Tick Back Price parameter, and at step 130, the order is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book and displayed on the public order book according to the price/time priority rules applying to the Display Price parameter, not according to the order's original higher price (i.e. the Top Price).
An example of a new restricted buy order sent to a posting market center 20 is provided below. It should be understood that the order prices and market prices discussed in this example are by way of example only to illustrate how the process of an embodiment of the invention handles a market center-restricted buy order in a trading environment without a price exemption (i.e. in a trading environment where market best bids and best offers are respected such that orders on one market center are not allowed to trade through an away market center if the away market center is displaying the market best bid or market best offer).
In this example, the Market Best Bid is $19.95 and the Market Best Offer is $20.00. An Away Market Center A is quoting 800 @ $ 19.95 to 300 @ $ 20.00. The posting market center 20 has a limit sell order for 300 @ $ 20.01 in the market (Order X). The posting market center internal book in this example appears as follows:
The posting market center 20 receives the three incoming market center-restricted buy orders stated below in the following sequence and processes each order in accordance with the process of
Order A: Buy 200 @ $19.99 (lower than the Market Best Offer price)
Order B: Buy 600 @ $20.00 (same as the Market Best Offer price)
Order C: Buy 700 @ $20.03 (higher than the Market Best Offer price)
Order A:
For Order A, the market center receives Order A at step 100. At step 102, the process assesses Order A's marketability against the posting market center's order book. In this case, Order A is not marketable because Order A is priced at $19.99, and this is lower than any offers presently posted on the posting market center 20. Accordingly, the process proceeds to step 112 where the process gets the away market best offer price from the data structure 25, which in this example is $20. At step 114, the process checks whether the away market best offer price is higher than Order A's buy order price. In this case, the away market best offer price ($20) is higher than Order A's restricted buy order price ($19.99), so the process continues on to step 116, setting the TickBack parameter to “N” since Order A's price does not need to be ticked back. At step 122, Order A is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book and is displayed on the public order book as an order to buy at $19.99.
Order B:
For Order B, the market center receives Order B at step 100. At step 102, the process assesses Order B's marketability against the posting market center's order book. In this case, as with Order A, Order B is not marketable. Even though Order B is priced at $20 and there is an offer in the market at $20, Order B is a restricted buy order and, as such, cannot execute against the offer at $20 on Away Market Center A. Accordingly, the process proceeds to step 112 where the process gets the away market best offer price of $20 in this example. At step 114, the process checks whether the away market best offer price is higher than Order B's buy order price. In this case, the away market best offer price ($20) is not higher than Order B's restricted buy order price ($20). They are equal. So, the process continues on to step 123, where the process sets the Top Price to $20 (i.e. Order B's buy order price). The process, then, at step 124, computes the tick back price parameter. In this example, the Tick Back Price parameter is $19.99 ($20-$0.01) (i.e. the away market best offer price minus one tick in this embodiment). It should be understood that “one tick” may be any trading increment (e.g., $0.01, $0.02, $0.03, etc.). A tick of $0.01 is used in this example for illustration purposes and in no way limits the scope of the present invention. At step 126, the process sets the Tick Back parameter to “Y” since Order B's price needs to be ticked back. At step 128, the process sets the Display Price parameter equal to the calculated Tick Back Price parameter. In this case, the Display Price parameter is set to $19.99. Then at step 130, Order B is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book, and the Display Price parameter of $19.99 is displayed on the public order book. However, the original price (i.e. the Top Price) of $20 is stored on the posting market center's internal book for reference for potential later re-pricing.
Order C:
For Order C, the market center receives Order C at step 100. At step 102, the process assesses Order C's marketability against the posting market center's order book. In this case, as with Orders A and B, Order C is not marketable. Accordingly, the process again proceeds to step 112 where the process gets the away market best offer of $20. At step 114, the process checks whether the away market best offer price is higher than Order C's buy order price. In this case, the away market best offer price ($20) is not higher than Order C's restricted buy order price ($20.03). As such, the process continues on to step 123, where the process sets the Top Price to $20.03 (i.e. Order C's buy order price). The process, then, at step 124, computes the tick back price parameter. In this example, as with Order B, the Tick Back Price parameter is $19.99 ($20-$0.01) (i.e. the away market best offer price minus one tick). At step 126, the process sets the Tick Back parameter to “Y” since Order C's price needs to be ticked back. At step 128, the process sets the Display Price parameter equal to the calculated Tick Back Price parameter. In this case, the Display Price parameter is set to $19.99. Then at step 130, Order C is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book, and the Display Price parameter of $19.99 is displayed on the public order book. However, the original price (i.e. the Top Price) of $20.03 is stored on the posting market center's internal book for reference for potential later re-pricing.
After processing Orders A, B and C in this example, the posting market center posts them to its internal book according to price/time priority rules. In this example, the stored parameters appear as follows:
In this example, at this point, the posting market center's best bid is 1500 @ $19.99 and the posting market center's best offer is 300 @ $20.01. The posting market center's public book looks like this:
Update of the Market Best Offer Price and Re-Evaluation of Ticked Back Market Center-Restricted Buy Orders
Once the process has ticked back a market center-restricted buy order, such as Orders B and C in the example above, those orders must be checked and re-evaluated whenever the Market Best Offer price is updated.
At step 152, the process checks if the updated Market Best Offer price is higher than the ticked back market center-restricted buy order's Display Price. If it is not, then, as indicated at step 154, the Display Price continues to be posted on the internal order book and displayed on the public order book. In this embodiment, the Display Price will continue to be displayed in the public order book even if, in light of a new away market best offer price, the Away Market Center now crosses or locks the Display Price of the ticked back order on the posting market center 20. Once a market center-restricted buy order of the present invention is posted, it will stand its ground to later updates of the Market Best Offer price that move to or through the displayed price, even if it results in an Away Market Center price crossing or locking a ticked back order. A market center-restricted buy order of the present invention differs from a traditional buy order that has been pegged to the offer (also known as a Market Peg) in this regard. A traditional pegged buy order moves with the price of the Market Best Offer price in both directions, up and down, even if the price of the Market Best Offer price moves to or through the displayed price of the pegged buy order. A buy order pegged to the Offer does not stand its ground to a Market Best Offer price that moves to or through it, causing the pegged buy order to be re-priced less aggressively. This is in contrast to a market center-restricted buy order of the present invention, which does stand its ground to a Market Best Offer price that moves to or through its displayed price. From step 154, the process proceeds to step 172 where it checks to see if there are any other buy orders with the Tick Back parameter set to “Y”.
Referring back to step 152, if the updated Market Best Offer price is higher than the ticked back market center-restricted buy order's Display Price, then the process proceeds to step 156 where the process checks to see if the updated Market Best Offer price is higher than the buy order's Top Price. If the updated Market Best Offer price is now higher than the buy order's Top Price, then the buy order's original price would no longer lock or cross the market if displayed. As such, at step 158, the TickBack parameter for this order is set to “N”, and this order is no longer a pegged order. At step 160, the Display Price for this order is set to the Top Price, and at step 162, the order is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book and displayed on the public order book according to the price/time priority rules applying to the Display Price parameter, which is now equal to the Top Price.
Referring back to step 156, if the updated Market Best Offer price is not higher than the buy order's Top Price, then at step 164, similar to when the order was displayed initially, the process computes a Tick Back Price parameter. As when the order was initially processed, the Tick Back Price parameter in this embodiment is equal to the Market Best Offer price minus one tick. At step 166, the process sets the Tick Back parameter to “Y” again. At step 168, the process sets the Display Price parameter equal to the updated Tick Back Price parameter, and at step 162, the order is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book and the Display Price is displayed on the public order book according to the price/time priority rules applying to the Display Price parameter, not according to the order's original higher price (i.e. the Top Price).
At step 172, the process checks to see if there are other buy orders with the Tick Back parameter set to “Y”. If there are, then the process goes back to step 142 and analyzes this order in the same manner it analyzed the previous buy order, as described above. The process continues in this manner until there are no further buy orders with a Tick Back parameter set to “Y” to update, at which point the update is complete as indicated at step 174.
Examples of situations where the away market best offer price has been updated are provided below. It should be understood that the order prices and market prices discussed in these examples are by way of example only to illustrate how the process of an embodiment of the invention handles updating a ticked back market center-restricted buy order.
In this Example 2, following through from Example 1, the Market Best Offer price has moved lower and has changed from $20 to $19.98. Away Market Center A is now quoting 800 @ $19.95 to 500 @ $19.98. Carrying through from Example 1 above, in the moment before processing and reevaluating the ticked back orders, the posting market center internal book appears as follows:
Orders B and C, since their Tick Back parameters are set to “Y”, are processed in accordance with the process of
Orders A, B and C stand their ground even though Away Market Center A has now crossed the posting market center's order book. In fact, because Orders A, B and C stand their ground, Away Market Center A, according to general marketplace rules applicable in this embodiment of the invention, is required to route an obligation to sell 1500 shares at $19.99 to the posting market center 20, the displayed size and price on the posting market center 20. Upon receipt, the posting market center 20 processes this obligation to trade with Orders A, B and C in the same manner it processes all other incoming away market trading obligations, by filling Orders A, B and C. If Away Market Center A does not satisfy its obligation to trade fully against Orders A, B and C, then the posting market center 20 follows its normal procedure of routing a request for satisfaction to Away Market Center A for any shares not filled.
In this Example 3, following through from Example 1, the Market Best Offer price has moved higher and has changed from $20 to $20.01. The posting market center 20 now has the Market Best Offer (Order X), and Away Market Center A is now quoting 800 @ $19.95 to 400 @ $20.02. Carrying through from Example 1 above, the posting market center internal book in the moment before processing and reevaluating the ticked back orders appears as follows:
Orders B and C, since their Tick Back parameters are set to “Y”, are processed in accordance with the process of
At step 142, the process retrieves Order C, since Order C has a Tick Back parameter set to “Y” and is next to be processed according to the price/time priority rules applicable in this example. The process then, at step 144, as before, determines whether the posting market center's best offer price is equal to the Market Best Offer price. In this example, it still is. Therefore, the process proceeds to step 146 where it determines whether the Order C's Top Price is greater than or equal to the posting market center's best offer price. Order C's Top Price ($20.03), in this example, is greater than the posting market center's best offer price ($20.01), so the process proceeds to step 148 where the process matches Order C against sell orders posted on the posting market center 20. In this example, 300 shares of Order C execute against Order X. At step 150, the process checks to see if Order C has any quantity remaining. In this instance, Order C does. It has 400 shares remaining. The process proceeds to step 151 where it gets the new Market Best Offer price. In this example, the new Market Best Offer price is $20.02 (i.e. the offer of 400 @ 20.02 on Away Market Center A). The process then proceeds to step 152.
At step 152, the process determines whether the Market Best Offer price is higher than Order C's Display Price. In this example, the new Market Best Offer price ($20.02) is higher than Order C's Display Price ($19.99). The process proceeds to step 156 where it determines whether the Market Best Offer price is higher than Order C's Top Price. In this example, the new Market Best Offer price ($20.02) is not higher than Order C's Top Price ($20.03). As such, at step 164, the process computes an updated tick back price parameter. In this example, the Tick Back Price parameter is $20.01 ($20.02-$0.01) (i.e. the away market best offer price minus one tick). At step 166, the process sets the Tick Back parameter to “Y” since Order C's price still needs to be ticked back. At step 168, the process sets the Display Price parameter equal to the calculated Tick Back Price parameter. In this case, the Display Price parameter is set to $20.01. Then at step 162, Order C is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book, and the Display Price parameter of $20.01 is displayed on the public order book. However, the original price (i.e. the Top Price) of $20.03 is still stored on the posting market center's internal book for reference for potential later re-pricing.
At step 172, the process checks to see if there are other buy orders with the Tick Back parameter set to “Y”. There are no more in this example. So, the update is complete, as indicated at step 174.
After processing Orders B and C as explained above, the posting market center posts them to its internal book according to price/time priority rules. In this example, the stored parameters appear as follows:
In this example, at this point, the posting market center's public book looks like this:
Incoming Market Center-Restricted Sell Order
At step 212, the process retrieves the away market best bid price from data structure 25. At step 214, the away market best bid price is checked to see if it is lower than the sell order price. If the away market best bid price is lower than the sell order price, then the restricted sell order will not lock or cross the away market. The process proceeds to step 216 where a parameter, in this example named TickBack, is set to “N”. Setting TickBack equal to “N” means that the process, as indicated at step 222, inserts the sell order in the posting market center's internal book and displays it on the public order book according to normal price/time priority rules for limit orders because the sell order does not lock or cross the away market.
Referring back to step 214, if the process determines that away market best bid price is not lower than the sell order price (i.e. the away market best bid price is equal to or greater than the sell order price), then the posting of this order on the posting market center 20 would lock or cross the away market. The process, in this instance, acts to protect the away market centers 24 while not canceling the order, as would have been done with prior systems. The process proceeds to step 223 where the process sets the “Bottom Price” parameter equal to the price set in the incoming sell order. The Bottom Price parameter sets the lowest possible price that the process will possibly set the order at when pegging it to the away market best bid price. Next, at step 224, the process computes a tick back price parameter (“Tick Back Price”). The tick back price parameter in this embodiment is equal to the away market best bid price plus one trade increment. At step 226, the process sets the tick back parameter (“Tick Back”) to “Y” so the system knows for later checks that the order price has been ticked back. At step 228, the process sets a display price parameter (“Display Price”) equal to the Tick Back Price parameter, and at step 230, the order is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book and displayed on the public order book according to the price/time priority rules applying to the Display Price parameter, not according to the order's original lower price (i.e. the Bottom Price).
An example of a new restricted sell order sent to a posting market center 20 is provided below. It should be understood that the order prices and market prices discussed in this example are by way of example only to illustrate how the process of an embodiment of the invention handles a market center-restricted sell order in a trading environment without a price exemption (i.e. in a trading environment where market best bids and best offers are respected such that orders on one market center are not allowed to trade through an away market center if the away market center is displaying the market best bid or market best offer).
In this example, the Market Best Bid is $19.95 and the Market Best Offer is $20.00. An Away Market Center A is quoting 300 @ $19.95 to 800 @ $20.00. The posting market center 20 has a limit buy order for 300 @ $19.94 in the market (Order Y). The posting market center internal book in this example appears as follows:
The posting market center 20 receives the three incoming market center-restricted sell orders stated below in the following sequence and processes each order in accordance with the process of
Order D: Sell 200 @ $19.96 (higher than the Market Best Bid price)
Order E: Sell 600 @ $19.95 (same as the Market Best Bid price)
Order F: Sell 700 @ $19.92 (lower than the Market Best Bid price)
Order D:
For Order D, the market center receives Order D at step 200. At step 202, the process assesses Order D's marketability against the posting market center's order book. In this case, Order D is not marketable because Order D is priced at $19.96, and this is higher than any bids presently posted on the posting market center 20. Accordingly, the process proceeds to step 212 where the process gets the away market best bid price from the data structure 25, which in this example is $19.95. At step 214, the process checks whether the away market best bid price is lower than Order D's sell order price. In this case, the away market best bid price ($19.95) is lower than Order D's restricted sell order price ($19.96), so the process continues on to step 216, setting the TickBack parameter to “N” since Order D's price does not need to be ticked back. At step 222, Order D is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book and is displayed on the public order book as an order to sell at $19.96.
Order E:
For Order E, the market center receives Order E at step 200. At step 202, the process assesses Order E's marketability against the posting market center's order book. In this case, as with Order D, Order E is not marketable. Even though Order E is priced at $19.95 and there is a bid in the market at $19.95, Order E is a restricted sell order and, as such, cannot execute against the bid at $19.95 on Away Market Center A. Accordingly, the process proceeds to step 212 where the process gets the away market best bid price of $19.95 in this example. At step 214, the process checks whether the away market best bid price is lower than Order E's sell order price. In this case, the away market best bid price ($19.95) is not lower than Order E's restricted sell order price ($19.95). They are equal. So, the process continues on to step 223, where the process sets the Bottom Price to $19.95 (i.e. Order E's sell order price). The process, then, at step 224, computes the tick back price parameter. In this example, the Tick Back Price parameter is $19.96 ($19.95+$0.01) (i.e. the away market best bid price plus one tick in this embodiment). At step 226, the process sets the Tick Back parameter to “Y” since Order E's price needs to be ticked back. At step 228, the process sets the Display Price parameter equal to the calculated Tick Back Price parameter. In this case, the Display Price parameter is set to $19.96. Then at step 230, Order E is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book, and the Display Price parameter of $19.96 is displayed on the public order book. However, the original price (i.e. the Bottom Price) of $19.95 is stored on the posting market center's internal book for reference for potential later re-pricing.
Order F:
For Order F, the market center receives Order F at step 200. At step 202, the process assesses Order F's marketability against the posting market center's order book. In this case, as with Orders D and E, Order F is not marketable. Accordingly, the process again proceeds to step 212 where the process gets the away market best bid price of $19.95. At step 214, the process checks whether the away market best bid price is lower than Order F's sell order price. In this case, the away market best bid price ($19.95) is not lower than Order F's restricted sell order price ($19.92). As such, the process continues on to step 223, where the process sets the Bottom Price to $19.92 (i.e. Order F's sell order price). The process, then, at step 224, computes the tick back price parameter. In this example, as with Order E, the Tick Back Price parameter is $19.96 ($19.95+$0.01) (i.e. the away market best bid price plus one tick). At step 226, the process sets the Tick Back parameter to “Y” since Order F's price needs to be ticked back. At step 228, the process sets the Display Price parameter equal to the calculated Tick Back Price parameter. In this case, the Display Price parameter is set to $19.96. Then at step 230, Order F is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book, and the Display Price parameter of $19.96 is displayed on the public order book. However, the original price (i.e. the Bottom Price) of $19.92 is stored on the posting market center's internal book for reference for potential later re-pricing.
After processing Orders D, E and F in this example, the posting market center posts them to its internal book according to price/time priority rules. In this example, the stored parameters appear as follows:
In this example, at this point, the posting market center's best offer is 1500 @ $19.96 and the posting market center's best bid is 300 @ $19.94. The posting market center's public book looks like this:
Update of the Market Best Bid Price and Re-Evaluation of Ticked Back Market Center-Restricted Sell Orders
Once the process has ticked back a market center-restricted sell order, such as Orders E and F in the example above, those orders must be checked and re-evaluated whenever the Market Best Bid price is updated.
At step 252, the process checks if the updated Market Best Bid price is lower than the ticked back market center-restricted sell order's Display Price. If it is not, then, as indicated at step 254, the Display Price continues to be posted on the internal order book and displayed on the public order book. In this embodiment, the Display Price will continue to be displayed in the public order book even if in light of a new away market best bid price, the Away Market Center now crosses or locks the Display Price of the ticked back order on the posting market center 20. Once a market center-restricted sell order of the present invention is posted, it will stand its ground to later updates of the Market Best Bid price that move to or through the displayed price, even if it results in an Away Market Center price crossing or locking a ticked back order. As with a market center-restricted buy order described above, a market center-restricted sell order of the present invention differs from a traditional sell order that has been pegged to the bid in this regard. A traditional pegged sell order moves with the price on the Market Best Bid price in both directions, up and down, even if the price of the Market Best Bid price moves to or through the displayed price of the pegged sell order. A sell order pegged to the Bid does not stand its ground to a Market Best Bid price that moves to or through it, causing it to be re-priced less aggressively. This, as with the market center-restricted buy order, is in contrast to a market center-restricted sell order of the present invention, which does stand its ground to a Market Best Bid price that moves to or through its displayed price. From step 254, the process proceeds to step 272 where it checks to see if there are any other sell orders with the Tick Back parameter set to “Y”.
Referring back to step 252, if the updated Market Best Bid price is lower than the ticked back market center-restricted sell order's Display Price, then the process proceeds to step 256 where the process checks to see if the updated Market Best Bid price is lower than the sell order's Bottom Price. If the updated Market Best Bid price is now lower than the sell order's Bottom Price, then the sell order's original price would no longer lock or cross the market if displayed. As such, at step 258, the TickBack parameter for this order is set to “N”, and this order is no longer a pegged order. At step 260, the Display Price for this order is set to the Bottom Price, and at step 262, the order is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book and displayed on the public order book according to the price/time priority rules applying to the Display Price parameter, which is now equal to the Bottom Price.
Referring back to step 256, if the updated Market Best Bid price is not lower than the sell order's Bottom Price, then at step 264, similar to when the order was displayed initially, the process computes a Tick Back Price parameter. As when the order was initially processed, the Tick Back Price parameter in this embodiment is equal to the Market Best Bid price plus one tick. At step 266, the process sets the Tick Back parameter to “Y” again. At step 268, the process sets the Display Price parameter equal to the updated Tick Back Price parameter, and at step 262, the order is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book and the Display Price is displayed on the public order book according to the price/time priority rules applying to the Display Price parameter, not according to the order's original lower price (i.e. the Bottom Price).
At step 272, the process checks to see if there are other sell orders with the Tick Back parameter set to “Y”. If there are, then the process goes back to step 242 and analyzes this order in the same manner it analyzed the previous sell order, as described above. The process continues in this manner until there are no further sell orders with a Tick Back parameter set to “Y” to update, at which point the update is complete as indicated at step 274.
Examples of situations where the away market best bid price has been updated are provided below. It should be understood that the order prices and market prices discussed in these examples are by way of example only to illustrate how the process of an embodiment of the invention handles updating a ticked back market center-restricted sell order.
In this Example 5, following through from Example 4, the Market Best Bid price has moved higher and has changed from $19.95 to $19.97. Away Market Center A is now quoting 500 @ $19.97 to 800 @ $20. Carrying through from Example 4 above, in the moment before processing and reevaluating the ticked back orders, the posting market center internal book appears as follows:
Orders E and F, since their Tick Back parameters are set to “Y”, are processed in accordance with the process of
Orders D, E and F stand their ground even though Away Market Center A has now crossed the posting market center's order book. In fact, because Orders D, E and F stand their ground, Away Market Center A, according to general marketplace rules applicable in this embodiment of the invention, is required to route an obligation to buy 1500 shares at $19.96 to the posting market center 20, the displayed size and price on the posting market center 20. Upon receipt, the posting market center 20 processes this obligation to trade with Orders D, E and F in the same manner it processes all other incoming away market trading obligations, by filling Orders D, E and F. If Away Market Center A does not satisfy its obligation to trade fully against Orders D, E and F, then the posting market center 20 follows its normal procedure of routing a request for satisfaction to Away Market Center A for any shares not filled.
In this Example 6, following through from Example 4, the Market Best Bid price has moved lower and has changed from $19.95 to $19.94. The posting market center 20 now has the Market Best Bid (Order Y), and Away Market Center A is now quoting 400 @ $19.93 to 800 @ $20. Carrying through from Example 4 above, the posting market center internal book in the moment before processing and reevaluating the ticked back orders appears as follows:
Orders E and F, since their Tick Back parameters are set to “Y”, are processed in accordance with the process of
At step 242, the process retrieves Order F, since Order F has a Tick Back parameter set to “Y” and is next to be processed according to the price/time priority rules applicable in this example. The process then, at step 244, as before, determines whether the posting market center's best bid price is equal to the Market Best Bid price. In this example, it still is. Therefore, the process proceeds to step 246 where it determines whether the Order F's Bottom Price is less than or equal to the posting market center's best bid price. Order F's Bottom Price ($19.92), in this example, is less than the posting market center's best bid price ($19.94), so the process proceeds to step 248 where the process matches Order F against buy orders posted on the posting market center 20. In this example, 300 shares of Order F execute against Order Y. At step 250, the process checks to see if Order F has any quantity remaining. In this instance, Order F does. It has 400 shares remaining. The process proceeds to step 251 where it gets the new Market Best Bid price. In this example, the new Market Best Bid price is $19.93 (i.e. the bid of 400 @ 19.93 on Away Market Center A). The process then proceeds to step 252.
At step 252, the process determines whether the Market Best Bid price is lower than Order F's Display Price. In this example, the new Market Best Bid price ($19.93) is lower than Order F's Display Price ($19.96). The process proceeds to step 256 where it determines whether the Market Best Bid price is lower than Order F's Bottom Price. In this example, the new Market Best Bid price ($19.93) is not lower than Order F's Bottom Price ($19.92). As such, at step 264, the process computes an updated tick back price parameter. In this example, the Tick Back Price parameter is $19.94 ($19.93+$0.01) (i.e. the away market best bid price plus one tick). At step 266, the process sets the Tick Back parameter to “Y” since Order F's price still needs to be ticked back. At step 268, the process sets the Display Price parameter equal to the calculated Tick Back Price parameter. In this case, the Display Price parameter is set to $19.94. Then at step 262, Order F is inserted into the posting market center's internal order book, and the Display Price parameter of $19.94 is displayed on the public order book. However, the original price (i.e. the Bottom Price) of $19.92 is still stored on the posting market center's internal book for reference for potential later re-pricing.
At step 272, the process checks to see if there are other sell orders with the Tick Back parameter set to “Y”. There are no more in this example. So, the update is complete, as indicated at step 274.
After processing Orders E and F as explained above, the posting market center posts them to its internal book according to price/time priority rules. In this example, the stored parameters appear as follows:
In this example, at this point, the posting market center's public book looks like this:
While the invention has been discussed in terms of certain embodiments, it should be appreciated that the invention is not so limited. The embodiments are explained herein by way of example, and there are numerous modifications, variations and other embodiments that may be employed that would still be within the scope of the present invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5101353 | Lupien et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5560580 | Almoslino | Oct 1996 | A |
5845266 | Lupien et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5905974 | Fraser et al. | May 1999 | A |
5950176 | Keiser et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6012046 | Lupien et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6098051 | Lupien et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6278982 | Korhammer et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6343278 | Jain et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6377940 | Tilfors et al. | Apr 2002 | B2 |
6405180 | Tilfors et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
6408282 | Buist | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6505174 | Keiser et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6615188 | Breen et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6618707 | Gary | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6714948 | Richards | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6829589 | Saliba | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6832210 | Li | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6850907 | Lutnick et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6963856 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6983260 | Hummelgren | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7162448 | Madoff et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7184982 | Howorka et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7197483 | Brady et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7209896 | Serkin et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7225153 | Lange | May 2007 | B2 |
7242669 | Bundy et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246090 | Thomas | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7246093 | Katz | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7249086 | Bloom et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7356498 | Kaminsky et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7383220 | Keith | Jun 2008 | B1 |
7401046 | Hollerman et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7467110 | Muller et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20010037284 | Finkelstein et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020010672 | Waelbroeck et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010673 | Muller et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020019795 | Madoff et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020019799 | Ginsberg et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020042765 | Dawson | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020062273 | Perkel et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020082979 | Sands et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020091617 | Keith | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020091621 | Conklin et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020128951 | Kiron et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128955 | Brady et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020128958 | Slone | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143676 | Kiron et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147670 | Lange | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161687 | Serkin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020169703 | Lutnick et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184135 | Zakaria | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020184136 | Cleary et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198815 | Greifeld et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198816 | Gilbert et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030004851 | Kiron et al. | Jan 2003 | A2 |
20030004858 | Schmitz et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009400 | Kiron et al. | Jan 2003 | A2 |
20030009412 | Furbush et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009413 | Furbush et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009414 | Furbush et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030014351 | Neff et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023536 | Hollerman et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030040955 | Anaya et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030041006 | Bunda | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030093343 | Huttenlocher et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030097328 | Lundberg et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115131 | Heaton et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030130920 | Freund et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130925 | Malitzis | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030130926 | Moore | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135443 | Moore et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139998 | Gilbert et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030172024 | Kokis et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177082 | Buckwalter | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030191703 | Chen et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030216932 | Foley | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229557 | Richmann et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233307 | Salvadori et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040030630 | Tilfors et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044610 | Fraser et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059666 | Waelbroeck et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040088242 | Ascher et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040143538 | Korhammer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143542 | Macgill et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20041043542 | Macgill et al. | Jul 2004 | |
20040177024 | Bok et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040177026 | Baladbon | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040210508 | Bohnenberger | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040210511 | Waelbroeck et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040215538 | Smith et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040225592 | Churquina | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236662 | Korhammer et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040236669 | Horst et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243502 | Slowik et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254804 | Peterffy et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040254877 | Buckwalter et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267655 | Davidowitz et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050010481 | Lutnick et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050075963 | Balabon | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050096999 | Newell et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050119964 | Brady et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125316 | Levering et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137962 | Penney et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050160024 | Soderborg et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050171887 | Daley et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171888 | Daley et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171889 | Daley et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171890 | Daley et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171891 | Daley et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050171895 | Howorka et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050197916 | Newell et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222936 | Panariti et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050228739 | Leibowitz | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050240510 | Schweichert et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050273407 | Black | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273408 | Bandman et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050273419 | Ogg et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283415 | Studnitzer et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283421 | Hatheway et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283426 | Krishnasami et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050283427 | Owens et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060020536 | Renton et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060031157 | Gianakouros et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060089898 | Durkin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060089899 | Durkin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060136318 | Rafieyan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060136326 | Heckman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060149659 | Carone et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060161494 | Littlewood | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060184444 | McConaughy et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060206404 | Hatheway et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206407 | Troxel et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235786 | DiSalvo | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060253374 | Addock et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060259391 | Schoen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060277137 | Claus et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060277138 | Ross et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070022041 | Durkin et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070043647 | Bickford | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070055607 | Wunsch et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070078753 | Cormack et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112693 | Cushing | May 2007 | A1 |
20070198391 | Dreyer et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070244792 | Couperier et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20080040290 | Harris | Feb 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
200624483 | Feb 2006 | AU |
2006244479 | Nov 2006 | AU |
2006244499 | Nov 2006 | AU |
2006244562 | Nov 2006 | AU |
2006244563 | Nov 2006 | AU |
2006244564 | Nov 2006 | AU |
2006244566 | Nov 2006 | AU |
1 321 870 | Jun 2003 | EP |
2008510109 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008510226 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008510238 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2008510110 | Nov 2008 | JP |
2007166754 | Jul 2007 | SG |
2007166762 | Jul 2007 | SG |
2007166770 | Jul 2007 | SG |
2007166788 | Jul 2007 | SG |
2007166796 | Jul 2007 | SG |
2007166804 | Jul 2007 | SG |
2007166812 | Jul 2007 | SG |
WO 0107039 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0109008 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0122322 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0122339 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO 0152166 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0175733 | Oct 2001 | WO |
WO 0190925 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO 2004008296 | Jan 2004 | WO |
WO 2005010790 | Feb 2005 | WO |
WO 2005036354 | Apr 2005 | WO |
PCTUS2006016683 | Jan 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2006016684 | Jan 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2006016685 | Jan 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2006016701 | Jan 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2006017249 | Jan 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2006017253 | Jan 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2006017296 | Jan 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2006036461 | Jan 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2006036878 | Feb 2006 | WO |
PCTUS2007016571 | Jan 2007 | WO |
PCTUS2007016572 | Jan 2007 | WO |
PCTUS2007016682 | Jan 2007 | WO |
PCTUS2007016718 | Jan 2007 | WO |
PCTUS2007016856 | Jan 2007 | WO |
PCTUS2007016857 | Jan 2007 | WO |
PCTUS2007024921 | Feb 2007 | WO |