This invention generally relates to elevator systems. More particularly, this invention relates to controlling movement of multiple cars in a single hoistway.
Elevator systems typically include a car that moves within a hoistway to carry passengers or cargo between different levels in a building. It has been proposed to include more than one elevator car within a single hoistway to achieve various types of system efficiencies. One challenge facing designers of such systems is maintaining adequate separation between the elevator cars when they are independently moveable relative to each other. Various proposals have been made in this area.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,364,065 discloses an arrangement for assigning cars to a particular call based upon a probability that a car assignment would result in failing to maintain a desired separation between cars. U.S. Pat. No. 6,619,437 discloses an arrangement where a hoistway is divided into dedicated zones restricted to only one elevator car and a common zone where more than one elevator car may travel. A decision to enter the common zone is based upon a direction of movement of another elevator car in the common zone at that time.
Published U.S. Patent Application No. 2005/0082121 discloses an arrangement that uses information regarding car position and door locks for determining regions within a hoistway that allow an elevator car to move at a contract speed. In the event that an elevator car becomes too close to another, one or more brakes are applied.
One shortcoming of such proposals is that passengers may perceive what appears to be unusual elevator car operation, which may be annoying. For example, if an elevator car is moving at a normal speed and then brought to a stop or significantly slowed down before it reaches an intended destination, the passengers may think there is a problem with the elevator operation. Of course, the passengers are unaware of the proximity of another elevator car in the hoistway, which is the reason for the unusual slowdown or stop of the elevator.
Another shortcoming of previous arrangements is that they do not address the potential for introducing excessive noise and vibration when two cars travel too close to each other.
It is desirable to provide an arrangement and strategy for controlling the movement of multiple elevator cars in a hoistway to maintain desired separation while concealing special control measures from passengers to minimize passenger inconvenience and to avoid a perception that something wrong or unusual has occurred. It is also desirable to avoid unwanted noise and vibration. This invention addresses those needs.
An exemplary method of controlling an elevator system having a plurality of elevator cars in a single hoistway includes determining whether there is at least one area between the starting floors and the last destination floors assigned to the elevator cars where the elevator cars will be too close if the elevator cars operate at a normal, contract speed. A door operation of at least one of the elevator cars is controlled in a manner that changes a time when the at least one elevator car will travel in the at least one area to increase a distance between the elevator cars in the at least one area.
In one example, a motion profile of one of the elevator cars is altered such that an acceleration or speed of the elevator car is different than a normal, contract speed for at least a portion of the scheduled run.
In one example, a total amount of time desired to change the distance between the cars in the area where the cars would otherwise be too close is divided into smaller segments that are introduced at various portions along the scheduled run so that the total change in travel time for a corresponding elevator car achieves the desired change in distance between the elevator cars in the area where the cars would otherwise be too close.
An exemplary elevator system includes a hoistway and a plurality of cars in the hoistway. A controller is configured to determine when each of the elevator cars is assigned to travel from a starting floor to a last destination floor and there is at least one area between the starting floors and the last destination floors where the elevator cars will be too close if the elevator cars operate at a normal, contract speed. The controller controls a door operation of at least one of the elevator cars to change a time when the at least one elevator car will travel in the at least one area to increase the distance between the elevator cars in that area.
The various features and advantages of this invention will become apparent to those skilled in the art from the following detailed description. The drawings that accompany the detailed description can be briefly described as follows.
Disclosed examples provide the ability to strategically control multiple elevator cars within a single hoistway to avoid having the cars get too close to each other where the possibility of inadequate separation may exist or the proximity of the cars would introduce undesirable noise and vibration. Disclosed examples include various door control techniques that change the expected travel time of at least one of the elevator cars within at least one area where the cars would otherwise be too close to each other. Other example techniques can be combined with door control techniques to achieve a desired effect.
A set of scheduled stops may include multiple scheduled stops or a single stop at the last destination floor. Various example sets of assigned stops are described with example control techniques below. Another technique used by the controller 30 is to control operation of one or more elevator machines 36 responsible for moving the elevator cars 22, 24 or both through the hoistway 26. By varying a speed or acceleration of at least one of the elevator cars from a normal, contract speed or acceleration for the given elevator system, the controller 30 can alter the timing when the elevator cars travel through various portions of the hoistway 26 while servicing their assigned stops.
One technique used in one example for increasing a distance between the elevator cars 22 and 24 in an area where they would otherwise be too close is to adjust control of door operation of at least one of the elevator cars at least once between a starting floor (including at the starting floor) and the area where the elevator cars 22, 24 are expected to be too close to each other. This is shown at 46 in
If one of the elevator cars should be moved more quickly than if a normal, contract profile were followed, the door open time may be reduced so that the doors close sooner than they otherwise would at the starting floor or the scheduled stop. By closing the doors sooner than would otherwise be done, that elevator car is allowed to leave the starting floor or the selected stop sooner than would otherwise have occurred. This allows that car to arrive sooner at the area of concern than it would otherwise.
One example includes adjusting the door open time of one elevator car to increase the time that the door is kept open and to decrease the amount of time that the door is kept open on another elevator car in a manner that will increase the distance between the cars when at least one of them is in the area where the cars would otherwise be too close.
Another example technique is shown at 50 in
When there is a desire to move an elevator car from one stop to another more quickly, the amount of time that the doors are kept closed upon arrival or prior to departure from a stop may be decreased in a suitable amount.
Another example technique is shown at 52 in
Another example technique is shown at 54. This technique uses the so-called landing open feature on a selective basis. The landing open feature includes timing the opening or closing of the door when the elevator car is within a prescribed distance of a landing and moving at a prescribed speed, which is different than only moving the elevator door when the elevator car is at a complete stop at a landing. When an early start from a scheduled stop is desired, for example, a landing open technique is applied to begin moving the car away from the landing before the doors are completely closed. On the other hand, when additional delay is desired, a landing open feature when an elevator car is approaching a landing may be omitted.
The example of
The example of
Although the example of
One example includes considering the traffic condition of the elevator system when deciding which control technique to implement. For example, during high traffic conditions, it may be more advantageous to speed up a leading car in the hoistway compared to delaying a following car in the hoistway. Introducing additional delays during high traffic conditions, for example, may decrease the traffic capacity of the elevator system. In such a situation, it would be more desirable to move a leading car more quickly to provide additional distance between the leading car and a following car. On the other hand, during low traffic conditions, it may be more desirable to enhance passenger convenience by providing additional delay of a following car, which will effectively slow down the arrival time of the following car at various locations in the hoistway and provide the desired additional distance between the cars. The controller 30 in one example is programmed to determine the elevator system traffic condition using known techniques and to select an appropriate control for providing the desired amount of distance between the elevator cars within the hoistway.
As shown in
In some circumstances the total time desired for either delaying one car or speeding up the other car may be long enough that if it is implemented in one instance while servicing the scheduled stops, it may be noticeable or inconvenient for passengers. In the example of
It is also possible to increase the speed with which the car 24 moves although there are more limitations on increasing elevator car speed beyond contract speeds compared to the ability to decrease the speed relative to a contract speed.
One example includes determining when the leading car is empty and then moving the leading car at a highest possible speed within the mechanical limits of the system to increase the distance between the cars.
Altering the motion profile in one example includes using one of a variety of techniques.
Selecting the motion profile in one example is based upon a current traffic condition. For example, during heavy traffic conditions, motion profiles corresponding to shorter runs may be most useful. On the other hand, when traffic intensity is light, reducing energy and providing improved ride quality and comfort may be achieved by selecting a motion profile where the run time is longer. One advantage of modifying a motion profile in this regard is to avoid having a car travel at the contract acceleration rate or speed and then having to stop during the run to wait for another car to be moved out of the way. Smoothing out the change from a contract motion profile provides improved perception of performance because passengers are typically more satisfied when they know that their car is moving toward their destination rather than waiting for no apparent reason. For example, it is most likely better for the car to move slowly to a next stop rather than waiting for sometime and then moving quickly or moving quickly and then stopping to wait for another car to move out of the way before continuing. Additional benefits to using an adjusted motion profile includes energy savings when it is possible to move a car slower because traffic is light enough and improving handling capacity and dispatching performance by moving a car faster when it is possible because the car is empty, for example.
A variety of control techniques have been disclosed above. Various combinations of them may be implemented in a system designed according to an embodiment of this invention. Given this description, those skilled in the art will realize which individual technique or which combination will best meet the needs of their particular situation.
The preceding description is exemplary rather than limiting in nature. Variations and modifications to the disclosed examples may become apparent to those skilled in the art that do not necessarily depart from the essence of this invention. The scope of legal protection given to this invention can only be determined by studying the following claims.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2006/062542 | 12/22/2006 | WO | 00 | 5/29/2009 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2008/079147 | 7/3/2008 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
849840 | Foster | Apr 1907 | A |
974439 | Schwab | Nov 1910 | A |
1027628 | Schwab | May 1912 | A |
1805227 | Rugg | May 1931 | A |
1896776 | James | Feb 1933 | A |
1896777 | James | Feb 1933 | A |
5651426 | Bittar et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5663538 | Sakita | Sep 1997 | A |
5785153 | Powell et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5823299 | Wierschke et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5865274 | Kiji et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5877462 | Chenais | Mar 1999 | A |
6273217 | Hikita | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6360849 | Hikita | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364065 | Hikita | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6554107 | Yumura et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6619437 | Hikita | Sep 2003 | B2 |
7032716 | Meyle et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7117979 | Angst et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7178635 | Meissner et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7487860 | Hikita et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7841450 | Smith et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
20050082121 | Deplazes | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050087402 | Haegi et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050279584 | Reuter et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060289240 | Sakita | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070039785 | Smith et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070089935 | Hikita | Apr 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1371596 | Dec 2003 | EP |
1698580 | Sep 2006 | EP |
1785384 | May 2007 | EP |
4345486 | Dec 1992 | JP |
4361960 | Dec 1992 | JP |
5051185 | Mar 1993 | JP |
5132257 | May 1993 | JP |
6305648 | Nov 1994 | JP |
8133611 | May 1995 | JP |
7157243 | Jun 1995 | JP |
7172716 | Jul 1995 | JP |
8133630 | May 1996 | JP |
9110316 | Apr 1997 | JP |
2001226050 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001240318 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001247265 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001251188 | Sep 2001 | JP |
2001335244 | Dec 2001 | JP |
2002220164 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002255460 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2003160283 | Jun 2003 | JP |
2004155519 | Jun 2004 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100065378 A1 | Mar 2010 | US |