Embodiments of the present invention relate to rights management for digital musical recordings.
Copyright law regarding devices that make copies of digital recordings is set forth in 17 U.S.C, Chapter 10, referred to as the “Digital Home Audio Recording Act of 1992.” Specifically, this Act requires payment of specific royalties to the Register of Copyrights. Royalty payments for digital audio recording devices are 2% of their transfer price, and royalty payments for digital audio recording media are 3% of their transfer price.
Copyright law regarding Internet service providers is set forth in the Digital Millennium Copyright Act of 1998.
Consumers are generally aware to some extent of copyright laws concerning digital recordings, but there are no automatic features in place to assist consumers in abiding with them. For example, a consumer who purchases a song on a CD, or through a subscription with an Internet music sharing service such as Napster, generally does not know if he is permitted to make personal copies of the song for himself, on one or more of his computers, or on one or more CDs, or on one or more MP3 players.
It would be beneficial if a system was in place to advise consumers whether or not a song may be copied for specific uses, and, if so, how many copies are permitted, and, if not, how to obtain the necessary copyright permission.
The present invention concerns a configurable method and system for managing copyright privileges when a digital song is copied from one digital audio device to another.
In a general setting, digital songs are (i) acquired from external sources, including, inter alia, Internet music services such as iTunes® and Napster®, CDs and other recording media, music kiosks and broadcast music stations such as cable and satellite stations; and thereafter (ii) copied between digital audio recorders and digital audio players. Transfer of songs may be likened in some respects to a virtual water distribution system with nodes and conduits, wherein the nodes store water and the conduits transmit water from one node to another. External nodes represent music sources such as record stores, kiosks and Internet music services; and internal nodes represent audio recorders and players.
Within this paradigm of water distribution, digital rights management concerns controlling valves that restrict the flow of water within the pipes.
For an embodiment of the present invention,
Preferably, digital audio players are registered with either zero or one digital audio recorder. In other words, a digital player cannot be registered with more than one recorder, but one digital recorder can have multiple digital players registered therewith.
Preferably, the label of a song is used to identify copyrights associated therewith. The Try & Buy label is used for promotional or trial versions of songs, and generally include an expiration event, upon occurrence of which the song “evaporates;” i.e., can no longer be played in its entirety.
For an embodiment of the present invention, copyright management is achieved by (i) restricting a song from being copied from a source device to a target device; and (ii) specifying the way a song is labeled within a target device when the song is copied from a source device to the target device—based on the source device, the target device, the label of the song in the source device, and based on whether or not the source and target device are commonly registered.
Further, for an alternate embodiment of the present invention, copyright management may restrict the number of copies permitted to be made for a song resident on a source device. For example, when a recorder is used to copy songs to a plurality of players, up to three copies of a song may be permitted.
Thus, embodiments of the present invention enable audio device manufacturers to configure a flexible logic for digital rights management in accordance with legal requirements in their respective locales. Various such configurations are described in the detailed description hereinbelow.
In distinction from embodiments of the present invention, prior art digital rights managers do not include the fundamental feature of adapting labels from source label to target label when a song is copied from a source device to a target device. One such prior art digital rights manager is Microsoft Corporation's Windows Media Rights Manager, which implements digital rights by encrypting audio files using keys, and packaging the files with key IDs. In order to play the audio files, a user obtains a license, which contains a key to decrypt the file.
Another such prior art digital rights manager is Apple Corporation's iTunes rights manager, which registers iPod music players with computers, so that an iPod cannot download a digital song from a computer that it is not registered with.
There is thus provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a method for managing rights for digital music, including registering music players, from among a plurality of music players, with digital archives that store songs, from among a plurality of digital archives, wherein songs can be copied from digital archives to music players, and from music players to digital archives, permitting a music player to copy a song from a digital archive for which it is registered, permitting a digital archive to copy a song from a music player that is registered with the digital archive, restricting a music player from copying a song from a digital archive for which it is not registered, and restricting a digital archive from copying a song from a music player that is not registered with the digital archive.
There is additionally provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a method for managing rights for digital music, including maintaining, by a digital archive of songs, for a song stored in the digital archive, a maximum number of permitted copies of the song, tracking, within the digital archive, for the song, a count of music players that copied the song from the digital archive, permitting a music player to copy the song from the digital archive if the count for the song has not reached the maximum number of permitted copies for the song, and restricting a music player from copying the song from the digital archive if the count for the song has reached the maximum number of permitted copies for the song.
There is moreover provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a method for managing rights for digital music, including registering groups of digital audio devices from among a plurality of digital audio devices with one another, the digital audio devices being able to store digital songs and to copy digital songs from one to another, labeling digital songs stored within digital audio devices according to copyright privileges, determining whether or not a song may be copied from a source digital audio device to a target digital audio device, and prescribing the label of a song within the target digital audio device when the song is copied from the source digital audio device to the target digital audio device, wherein the determining and the prescribing are based on the source digital audio device, the target digital audio device and the label of the song within the source digital audio device, and also based on whether or not the source and target digital audio devices are registered with one another.
There is further provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a computer-readable storage medium storing program code for causing a device to perform the steps of registering music players, from among a plurality of music players, with digital archives that store songs, from among a plurality of digital archives, wherein songs can be copied from digital archives to music players, and from music players to digital archives, permitting a music player to copy a song from a digital archive for which it is registered, permitting a digital archive to copy a song from a music player that is registered with the digital archive, restricting a music player from copying a song from a digital archive for which it is not registered, and restricting a digital archive from copying a song from a music player that is not registered with the digital archive.
There is yet further provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a computer-readable storage medium storing program code for causing a device to perform the steps of maintaining, by a digital archive of songs, for a song stored in the digital archive, a maximum number of permitted copies of the song, tracking, within the digital archive, for the song, a count of music players that copied the song from the digital archive, permitting a music player to copy the song from the digital archive if the count for the song has not reached the maximum number of permitted copies for the song, and restricting a music player from copying the song from the digital archive if the count for the song has reached the maximum number of permitted copies for the song.
There is additionally provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a computer-readable storage medium storing program code for causing a device to perform the steps of registering groups of digital audio devices from among a plurality of digital audio devices with one another, the digital audio devices being able to store digital songs and to copy digital songs from one to another, labeling digital songs stored within digital audio devices according to copyright privileges, determining whether or not a song may be copied from a source digital audio device to a target digital audio device, and prescribing the label of a song within the target digital audio device when the song is copied from the source digital audio device to the target digital audio device, wherein the determining and the prescribing are based on the source digital audio device, the target digital audio device and the label of the song within the source digital audio device, and also based on whether or not the source and target digital audio devices are registered with one another.
There is moreover provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a system for managing rights for digital music, comprising a plurality of digital archives that store songs, a plurality of music players at least some of which are registered with digital archives, wherein songs can be copied from digital archives to music players, and from music players to digital archives, and a rights manager housed within a digital archive permitting a music player to copy a song from the digital archive if the music player is registered with the digital archive, permitting the digital archive to copy a song from a music player if the music player is registered with the digital archive, restricting a music player from copying a song from the digital archive if the music player is not registered with the digital archive, and restricting the digital archive from copying a song from a music player if the music player is not registered with the digital archive.
There is further provided in accordance with an embodiment of the present invention a system for managing rights for digital music, including a digital archive of songs including a database manager for maintaining a maximum number of permitted copies of a song, for a song stored within the digital archive, and for tracking a count of music players that copied the song from the digital archive, and a rights manager for permitting a music player to copy the song from the digital archive if the count for the song has not reached the maximum number of permitted copies for the song, and for restricting a music player from copying the song from the digital archive if the count for the song has reached the maximum number of permitted copies for the song.
A system is described for managing rights for digital music, including a plurality of audio devices, each being able to store digital songs and to copy digital songs from one to another, wherein groups of the digital audio devices are registered with one another. A database manager is provided for labeling digital songs stored within digital audio devices according to copyright privileges, for determining whether or not a song may be copied from a source digital audio device to a target digital audio device, and for prescribing the label of a song within the target digital audio device when the song is copied from the source digital audio device to the target digital audio device. Said determining and said prescribing are based on the source digital audio device, the target digital audio device and the label of the song within the source digital audio device, and also based on whether or not the source and target digital audio devices are registered with one another.
The present invention will be more fully understood and appreciated from the following detailed description, taken in conjunction with the drawings in which:
Digital music players are proliferating as standalone consumer electronic devices, such as MP3 players, as bundled components within portable devices such as personal data assistants (PDAs) and cell-phones, and as home network appliances. Listeners typically build up their own personal libraries of digital songs, which are stored on memory units such as hard disk drives and removable memory cards. Digital songs are typically acquired through the Internet via subscription services and peer-to-peer exchanges, or by converting songs from a compact disc (CD) and importing them into an MP3 library. Acquiring digital music files may infringe copyrights, unless the files are validly obtained through a service that pays royalties to the recording industry.
Digital songs typically include audio data and auxiliary data, referred to as meta-data, used to index the songs within the listener's library. For example, within MP3 files meta-data is accessed through an ID3Tag; WMA files embed meta-data within the files, and also within the filenames themselves. By indexing the songs, a listener can search his library and access individual songs therein. Typically audio players provide a user interface through which users view meta-data.
Barring copyright issues, building up a digital music library requires a lot of time and work. Typically, a listener first searches the Internet for one or more songs of interest, then identifies locations of the songs, and then downloads them into a database associated with a media player. Songs are typically stored as digital files, formatted in compliance with a standard format, such as MP3 or WMA. Once the songs are downloaded, the listener typically uses software such as Windows Media player or Winamp to play the songs on a computer, or alternatively he copies the songs onto a hardware device, such as an iPod™ or MP3 player, that plays the songs.
A shortcoming in the world of digital music is the great effort required to build custom music libraries at home. Often individuals spend nights on end downloading their favorite songs and building their own personal music libraries. An alternative is to either purchase libraries that have been prepared by others, but often someone else's library does not match a listener's taste and the listener prefers to collect his own favorite songs.
A popular source for a listener to hear his favorite songs is on music stations. Cable, satellite broadcast, and the Internet provide music channels for almost every genre of music—classical music, rock and roll, jazz, music of the 80's, etc. A listener can enjoy music according to his taste by subscribing to such broadcast services.
Embodiments of the present invention enable a listener to automatically copy and import songs that are broadcast from a music station into his digital music library, along with the songs' meta-data required for indexing his library. Using embodiments of the present invention a listener, with practically no effort, can automatically build up a large digital music library with tens of thousands of his choice of songs, all properly indexed for search and retrieval. Moreover, an additional feature of embodiments of the present invention enables the listener to select which songs from among those broadcast on the music stations are to be imported into his library, based on one or more of criteria including inter alia genre, song title, artist, album and length of song.
Copying songs that are broadcast from a music station is akin to copying television programs onto a VCR. Copyright law permits a consumer to copy television programs broadcast to his home onto his VCR. The technology for automatically copying songs, however, is more complex since raw audio recording from a music station does not provide the meta-data necessary to identify such songs and incorporate them into a digital music library. Moreover, each song has to be separated out from other songs, because songs are played sequentially on the music station, generally without breaks in between.
Embodiments of the present invention concern a method and system for automatically building digital music libraries from music channels broadcast through cable and satellite stations. For one embodiment of the present invention, broadcast songs are recorded into a digital music library, along with meta-data necessary for indexing and accessing each individual song, and for display while the songs are being played. Using embodiments of the present invention, the digital music library generated from the broadcast music serves as a large library of individual songs, with full search and access capability.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a system that enables the listener to automatically digitally record each broadcast song into a digital music library, and automatically index each song according to genre, song title, artist and album title, as described hereinbelow. Additionally, embodiments of the present invention enable the listener to filter songs to be automatically recorded, by specifying inter alia a genre, song tile or artist, instead of recording all of the broadcast songs. The listener need not be present while the system of embodiments of the present invention is in operation. It may thus be appreciated that embodiments of the present invention enable automatic generation of large libraries of songs.
An embodiment of the invention comprises a programmable device, referred to herein as a “Nest,” that can interface with computers, with MP3 players and other digital music players, and with other electronic devices that include MP3 players or other digital music players therewithin, including, inter alia, cell phones, PDAs, home network appliances and Internet appliances. In a first embodiment, the Nest is coupled to a satellite/cable receiver; in a second embodiment, the Nest is coupled to a television; in a third embodiment, the Nest is coupled to various external components via a USB and a Firewire connection.
In all embodiments, the memory storing the digital music library can be either a large hard disk situated within the Nest itself, or one or more smaller removable memory units such as compact disks and memory cards, or a combination of hard disk and removable memory. The advantage of a large hard disk is that the listener's music library is consolidated into a single library that can be searched and accessed in its entirety. The advantage of removable memory units, such as compact disks, is that the listener can insert the disks into portable players such as MP3 players. Assuming that 40 songs on average require 128 MB of data and include one and a half hour's worth of listening, a large 80 GB hard disk can hold a library of approximately 25,600 songs; and a 640 MB compact disk can hold approximately 200 songs, or about 7% hours worth of listening.
Reference is now made to
For an embodiment of the present invention, a Nest includes one or more exchange ports 180, also referred to herein as “cradles,” through which one or more hand-held digital music players, referred to herein as “Eggs,” can be connected to the Nest, for loading songs from a digital music library stored on the Nest thereto. Such exchange ports may be circular or oval ports into which Eggs in the shape of film canisters are inserted. Eggs may be “charged up” with songs while they are plugged into the cradles of the Nest.
Reference is now made to
Reference is now made to
A typical usage scenario for a Nest and Egg is as follows. A listener sets his cable or satellite receiver box to a specific music channel, preferably from a commercial-free radio station such as The Music Choice®, and activates the Nest to capture songs from the music channel. The Nest automatically creates a digital music library and imports the broadcast songs therein. Thereafter, the listener plugs an Egg into a cradle of the Nest, and downloads selected songs from the music library onto the Egg. If the Nest is connected to the listener's speaker system, then the listener may also pipe music from the Nest into speakers in various rooms. If the Nest is connected to a home network, the listener may stream audio to a computer that is authorized to work with the Nest.
Preferably, in addition to a Nest being able to download songs to the Egg when the Egg is connected to the Nest, the Nest is also able to remove songs stored in the Egg. Thus, if the Egg storage is full, the Nest can remove songs from the Egg, in order for the Egg to download a new set of songs.
Eggs of embodiments of the present invention may receive digital music from other sources, in addition to the Nest. Thus the Eggs may be compatible with kiosks, such as music kiosks located in music distribution stores, used for listening to songs prior to purchase and for subsequent purchase. Preferably, when an Egg is connected to a Nest, the digital music received from other devices and stored within the Egg can be archived on the Nest.
An Egg may receive control commands through its USB connector. Specifically,
Reference is now made to
The GUI shown in
Copyright Management
In an enhanced embodiment of the present invention incorporates digital rights management. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, an Egg is registered with at most one Nest, and only Eggs registered with a Nest have the right to check-out non-promotional songs therefrom, as described hereinbelow. Typically, a Nest will have multiple Eggs registered with the Nest.
In accordance with a preferred embodiment of the present invention, a song within a Nest or an Egg is labeled as “Purchased”, “Recorded” or “Try & Buy”. A “Purchased” song is one that is paid for by a consumer. Purchased songs include inter alia songs purchased through an Internet service such as iTunes® or Napster®, songs purchased through a kiosk, and songs copied and converted (“ripped”) to a format such as MP3 from a CD that is purchased. “Recorded” songs include songs recorded for a consumer from a cable or satellite music station. “Try & Buy” songs are promotional or trial versions of songs that are provided to a consumer for free, and eventually expire. If the consumer wishes to continue to listen to such songs, he must obtain a Purchased or Recorded version of the song. “Purchased” labels are also referred to herein as “Owned-by-Purchase” labels, and “Recorded” labels are also referred to herein as “Owned-by-Recording” labels. In addition, “Purchased” and “Recorded” labels are also referred to herein collectively as “Ownership” labels, and “Try & Buy” labels are also referred to herein as “Non-Ownership” labels.
Expiration of a Try & Buy song may occur, inter alia, after a fixed time period, such as thirty days, or after a fixed number of playbacks of the song. Upon expiration, a Try & Buy song may cease to play altogether, or may play only a down-sampled version of the song or a header of the song, or may instead play a message explaining how to purchase the song, or otherwise enable purchase of the song.
Preferably, the label of a Try & Buy song includes a URL or other such identifier for one or more web sites that serve as a clearinghouse through which the song can be purchased.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the Nest includes a list of songs that are already contained within the Nest and songs that are not already contained within the Nest. For example, whenever a song from a specific album by a specific artist is contained within the Nest, the list includes other songs from the same album or other songs by the same artist. Songs that have been recorded within the Nest are labeled as Recorded. Other songs, not contained within the Nest, can preferably be downloaded to the Nest as trial Try & Buy versions, upon request by a consumer. After listening to a Try & Buy version of a song, the consumer may purchase the song using the Nest, and the purchased song is then labeled as Purchased. Such labeling of a song as Recorded, Purchased or Try & Buy serves to identify the copyrights associated with the song.
Preferably, when a song is copied from one device to another device where the two devices are registered with one another, such as from a Nest to an Egg that is registered with the Nest, or from an Egg to a Nest that the Egg is registered with, the label of the song is maintained; i.e., the label of the song on the target device is set to the label of the song on the source device. For example, if a Try & Buy song is copied from a Nest to an Egg that is registered with the Nest, and then to another Egg that is also registered with the same Nest, then the song is labeled as Try & Buy on the two Eggs. Similarly, if an Egg is used to purchase a song from a kiosk and the song is subsequently copied to a Nest that the Egg is registered with, then the song is labeled as Purchased on the Egg and on the Nest.
Preferably, when a song is copied from one device to another device where the two devices are not registered with one another, such as from a Nest to an Egg or from an Egg to a Nest, where the Egg is not registered with the Nest, then regardless of the label of the song on the source device, the song is labeled as Try & Buy on the target device.
Table I summarizes the copyright labeling of a song on a target device.
The logic of table I assumes that any two devices can determine whether or not they are commonly registered. This capability can be achieved, for example, if the registration information is built into a Nest and an Egg at the time of manufacture.
In addition to the logic of Table I, the label of a song within a Nest of an Egg is changed from Try & Buy to Purchased if a user purchases the song from a clearinghouse, using the Nest or the Egg, respectively.
In a first alternative embodiment of the present invention, the Nest can directly determine whether an Egg is registered with it, but an Egg cannot directly determine whether it is registered with a Nest, or whether it and another Egg are registered to the same Nest. This occurs, for example, if an Egg has the capability of registering itself with any one of a plurality of Nests after it is manufactured. In this latter case, the logic of Table I is modified so that whenever a song is copied from a source Egg to a target Egg, the song is labeled as Try & Buy in the target Egg. Accordingly, the copyright labeling of a song on a target device follows Table II.
In this first alternative embodiment, an egg that is registered with a first Nest may be re-registered with a second Nest. In such case, the Egg is no longer registered with the first Nest. Preferably, there is a limit to the number of times an Egg can be re-registered, and after an Egg re-registers itself a maximum number of times, it is blocked from further re-registration.
In a second alternative embodiment of the present invention, the distinction between Purchased and Recorded songs is ignored, and both are identified as “Owned” songs. In this second alternative embodiment, the copyright labeling of a song on a target device follows Table III.
In yet a third alternative embodiment of the present invention, copying of songs from a Nest to multiple Eggs, each of which is registered with the Nest, is restricted. This third alternative embodiment has a more elaborate logic than the other embodiments. In order to best describe this logic, the terms “checking-out” and “checking-in” of songs are used as follows. When an Egg is connected to a Nest in order to download songs from the Nest to the Egg, this is referred to herein as “checking-out” of songs. When an Egg is connected to a Nest in order to remove songs stored in the Egg, this is referred to herein as “checking-in” of songs.
Often the same song can be broadcast multiple times from a cable or satellite music station, while the Nest is operational to record the broadcast songs. For an embodiment of the present invention, the Nest stores a count for each Recorded song, which is incremented when the Nest encounters a broadcast song that has already been recorded onto the Nest archive. Such count thus corresponds to the total number of times the Recorded song has been broadcast while the Nest was recording, and is denoted henceforth as max_permitted_copies. For example, if a Recorded song is re-played five times on the Music Channel while the Nest is recording from the Music Channel, then max_permitted_copies=5 for such song.
The max_permitted_copies count for a Recorded song is used to restrict the number of different Eggs that the Nest allows to check-out the song. For example, if max_permitted_copies=5 for a Recorded song, then at most five different Eggs can check-out the song from the Nest. That is, for each Recorded song in its archive, the Nest stores a count for each song, which is incremented when an Egg checks-out the song. Such count corresponds to the number of Eggs that have checked-out the song, and is denoted henceforth as number_copies_checked_out. For example, if three Eggs have checked-out the same Recorded song from the Nest, then number_copies_checked_out=3 for such song.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, when an Egg checks-in a Recorded song with the Nest, thereby removing the song from the Egg, the number_copies_checked_out count is decremented. For example, if number_copies_checked_out=3 for a Recorded song and an Egg that checked-out the song subsequently checks-in the song, then number_copies_checked_out is decremented to 2 for such song.
Reference is now made to,
Reference is now made to
If, at operation 620 the Nest determines that the Egg is not registered with the Nest, or if, at operation 630, the Nest determines that number_copies_checked_out is equal to max_permitted_copies, then the Egg's request for the Recorded song is denied at operation 660. Alternatively, the Recorded song may be copied onto the Egg as a trial version, and labeled Try & Buy.
Reference is now made to
If at operation 720 the Nest determines that the Egg is not registered with the Nest, then the Egg's request to check-in the song is denied at operation 760. Alternatively, the song may be copied onto the Nest as a trial version, and labeled Try & Buy. If at operation 730 the Nest determines that the song does not currently reside within its digital archive, then this indicates that the Egg obtained the song from another source, such as from a kiosk. As such, at operation 770 the Nest initializes max_permitted_copies=1 for the song, and number_copies_checked_out=0 for the song. At operation 780 the Nest copies the song and its meta-data from the Egg into the Nest's digital archive.
Preferably, when a Recorded song is copied from a first Egg to a second Egg in this embodiment, the song is labeled as Try & Buy on the second Egg, even if the first and second Egg are both registered to the same Nest.
Purchased songs may also be restricted for copying to multiple Eggs with similar logic, by setting max_permitted_copies=1.
In general, it may now be appreciated by those skilled in the art that embodiments of the present invention support a general digital rights configuration, by means of rules that specify whether or not a song residing on a source device has requisite permission for copying to a target device and, if so, how the song should be labeled when copied to the target device. Such rules may be embodied within functions
More generally, as described hereinabove, the functions mayBeCopied( ) and trgtLabel( ) may have additional parameters max_permitted_copies and number_copies_checked_out, where max_permitted_copies and number_copies_checked_out are both song and device specific parameters:
It may be appreciated by those skilled in the art that alternatively the functions mayBeCopied( ) and trgtLabel( ) may be embodied as tables or other data structures.
Reference is now made to
It may be appreciated by those skilled in the art that digital songs and their meta-data may be stored in one or more database tables, within database 820, that can be joined. Alternatively, the binary song data may be stored in memory locations outside of database 820, and pointed to by address entries in database 820. It may also be appreciated that database 820 may instead be structured as a plurality of databases.
Also shown in
Rights manager 815 determines whether or not a song resident on source device 810 may be copied to a specified target device, such as target device 825. If copying of the song is permitted, then rights manager 815 further determines a label to be used for the song on the target device, referred to as the target label. In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, rights manager 815 bases its determination on (i) the type of source device 805, (ii) the type of target device 825, (iii) the label of the song on source device 805, and (iv) the max_permitted_copies and number_copies_checked_out parameters for the song on source device 805. Rights manager 815 preferably implements functions such as mayBeCopied( ) and trgtLabel( ) described hereinabove.
After rights manager 815 determines the target label, it transmits the song and the target label to target device 825. Target device 825 preferably adds the song to its database 840 and labels the song in database 840 according to the target label.
Also shown in
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, clearinghouse 845 also freely distributes Try & Buy versions of songs, which can be converted to Purchased versions at a later date, if a user so desires.
Preferably, clearinghouse 845 is administered by an entity that has distribution privileges for the songs it sells, such as a cable or satellite company.
Reference is now made to
At operation 910 the target device requests a song to be copied from the source device. At operation 920 the source device receives the request and identifies the target device. In particular, the source device determines the type of the target device, and whether or not the source and target device are registered with one another.
At operation 930 the source device determines the label for the requested song, and the max_permitted_copies and number_copies_checked_out parameters for the requested song. Preferably, this information is contained within a source device database, such as database 820 (
At operation 970 the source device transmits the requested song and its label to the target device, and at operation 980 the target device copies the requested song to its database, and labels the requested song accordingly.
In reading the above description, persons skilled in the art will realize that there are many apparent variations that can be applied to the methods and systems described. Thus, the configurable logic described hereinabove for songs and audio devices is applicable as well to movies and video devices, and to other types of media and media devices. As such, the respective terms “audio device”, “digital songs”, “source audio device”, “target audio device”, “digital audio acquisition device” and “digital audio player” as used through the specification for the specific embodiment related to digital audio, are to be construed respectively generally as “content device”, “media content”, “source content device”, “target content device”, “content acquisition device” and “content player”.
Transfer of songs from source devices to target devices, and from clearinghouses to devices, may be performed in batches of songs, such as entire albums, as well as for single songs. In addition, devices may be “hot-synched” to one another. For example, an Egg may be hot-synched to a Nest, using wired or wireless communication, so that the Nest is updated periodically with the songs in the Egg.
In the foregoing specification, the invention has been described with reference to specific exemplary embodiments thereof. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made to the specific exemplary embodiments without departing from the broader spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the specification and drawings are to be regarded in an illustrative rather than a restrictive sense.
This application is a continuation-in-part of pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/829,581, filed on Apr. 21, 2004, entitled Portable Music Player and Transmitter, which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/336,443, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,191,193, filed on Jan. 2, 2003, entitled Automatic Digital Music Library Builder. The present patent application claims priority from both application Ser. No. 10/829,581 and application Ser. No. 10/336,443.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4230990 | Lert, Jr. et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4659231 | Barkouki | Apr 1987 | A |
5016171 | Connolly et al. | May 1991 | A |
5129036 | Dean et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5161251 | Mankovitz | Nov 1992 | A |
5287408 | Samson | Feb 1994 | A |
5303326 | Dean et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5715403 | Stefik | Feb 1998 | A |
5892536 | Logan et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5892900 | Ginter et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5918213 | Bernard et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5946664 | Ebisawa | Aug 1999 | A |
5970390 | Koga et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6088455 | Logan et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6092080 | Gustman | Jul 2000 | A |
6142375 | Belka et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6146276 | Okuniewicz | Nov 2000 | A |
6163711 | Juntunen et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6202060 | Tran | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6266654 | Schull | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6336219 | Nathan | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6372974 | Gross et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6389162 | Maeda | May 2002 | B2 |
6449367 | Van Wie et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
6463444 | Jain et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6567984 | Allport | May 2003 | B1 |
6608930 | Agnihotri et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6615192 | Tagawa et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636588 | Kimura et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6662231 | Drosset et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6671494 | James | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6697944 | Jones et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6748537 | Hughes | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6771748 | Parker et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6774604 | Matsuda et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6774796 | Smith | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6834308 | Ikezoye et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6847950 | Kamibayashi et al. | Jan 2005 | B1 |
6876974 | Marsh et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6880081 | Itkis | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888950 | Siskin et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6934837 | Jaisimha et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6947598 | Yogeshwar et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6983371 | Hurtado et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
7006424 | Nonaka et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020888 | Reynolds et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7046239 | Asai et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7046956 | Cohen | May 2006 | B1 |
7073063 | Peinado | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7119267 | Hirade et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134145 | Epstein | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7158842 | Ohmura et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7170999 | Kessler et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7188186 | Meyer et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7191193 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203966 | Abburi et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7231656 | Nathan | Jun 2007 | B1 |
7281034 | Eyal | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7343347 | Ostrover et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7363372 | Potenzone et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7370017 | Lindeman et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7389273 | Irwin et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7415439 | Kontio et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
7421411 | Kontio et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440365 | Hattori et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7512549 | Morita et al. | Mar 2009 | B1 |
7516213 | Cunningham et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7523312 | Kalker et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7600266 | Thomas | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7707221 | Dunning et al. | Apr 2010 | B1 |
7730300 | Candelore | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7756792 | Hughes | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7756915 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7761176 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7925591 | Gajjala et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7930758 | Cho et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8201262 | Matsuo et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8327454 | Jogand-Coulomb et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8413255 | Cho et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
20010018693 | Jain et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010051996 | Cooper | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007350 | Yen | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020007351 | Hillegass et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020010759 | Hitson et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020015362 | Cowgill et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032747 | Toki | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020045960 | Phillips et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020066115 | Wendelrup | May 2002 | A1 |
20020068558 | Janik | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020076051 | Nii | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077984 | Ireton | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020077986 | Kobata et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020100062 | Lowthert et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020114466 | Tanaka et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020116277 | Kraft | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120456 | Berg et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020126762 | Tanaka | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020138852 | Reynolds et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020157002 | Messerges et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020177914 | Chase | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184537 | Inokuchi et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020186844 | Levy et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020189427 | Pachet | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009423 | Wang et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009681 | Harada et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018491 | Nakahara et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030018582 | Yaacovi | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021441 | Levy et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028622 | Inoue et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030040206 | Wang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030050894 | Kambayashi et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065642 | Zee | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076955 | Alve et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030078891 | Capitant | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079030 | Cocotis et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079038 | Robbin et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084126 | Kumar et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030084306 | Abburi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030098817 | Choi | May 2003 | A1 |
20030110502 | Creed et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120541 | Siann et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030131252 | Barton | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030135513 | Quinn et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030154378 | Hirano | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030158737 | Csicsatka | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163823 | Logan et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030172113 | Cameron et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030177073 | Ogai | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030182184 | Strasnick et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030188150 | Ohkado et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030217057 | Kuroiwa et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030226012 | Asokan et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030229654 | Bibas et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030232593 | Wahlroos et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233929 | Agnihotri et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040003281 | Sonoda et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040003398 | Donian et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040013125 | Betker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040021704 | Mitsutake | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040049559 | Saubade | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040058649 | Grady | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078338 | Ohta et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089141 | Georges et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040089142 | Georges et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040117442 | Thielen | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128324 | Sheynman et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040131255 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133657 | Smith et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133908 | Smith et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040133914 | Smith et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040148191 | Hoke, Jr. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040158741 | Schneider | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040187014 | Molaro | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040199771 | Morten et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040224638 | Fadell et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040225612 | Shimojima et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040252966 | Holloway et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040253945 | Janik | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040255135 | Kitaya et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040267390 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050004873 | Pou et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050014536 | Grady | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050015464 | Young | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050055352 | White et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050065624 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071280 | Irwin et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071663 | Medvinsky et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050120380 | Wolfe | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050125087 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050171938 | Fisher et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210261 | Kamperman et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050210395 | Wakita et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050227679 | Papulov | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060010075 | Wolf | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060030961 | Lin | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031257 | Lipscomb et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031558 | Ortega et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060107330 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122881 | Walker et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060242083 | Chavez | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070030972 | Glick et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070038999 | Millington | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070094276 | Isaac | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112678 | Himelfarb | May 2007 | A1 |
20070156762 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070162395 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070198426 | Yates et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070198859 | Harada et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070244794 | Fenley | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070250403 | Altschuler | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070271184 | Niebert et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080183595 | Sakamoto | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080320598 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080320605 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090043412 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090044285 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090077190 | Gupta | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090093899 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090094663 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090248535 | Fisher et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100036759 | Ben-Yaacov et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100333211 | Schonfeld et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 760 505 | Mar 1997 | EP |
1 016 991 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1 074 926 | Feb 2001 | EP |
1 251 440 | Oct 2002 | EP |
1 304 874 | Apr 2003 | EP |
1 307 062 | May 2003 | EP |
1 898 323 | Mar 2008 | EP |
2 096 599 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2 098 973 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2 364 215 | Jan 2002 | GB |
2 380 364 | Apr 2003 | GB |
08-046538 | Feb 1996 | JP |
08-152881 | Jun 1996 | JP |
08-263440 | Oct 1996 | JP |
10-308056 | Nov 1998 | JP |
11-073730 | Mar 1999 | JP |
11-122129 | Apr 1999 | JP |
11-259964 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2000-269904 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000-307527 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2000-315177 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2001-022843 | Jan 2001 | JP |
2001-075871 | Mar 2001 | JP |
2001-236081 | Aug 2001 | JP |
2001-320373 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002-015147 | Jan 2002 | JP |
2002-162973 | Jun 2002 | JP |
2002-230895 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-245066 | Aug 2002 | JP |
2002-262254 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2002-351744 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2002-359803 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2003-114949 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-124921 | Apr 2003 | JP |
2003-338976 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2003-339000 | Nov 2003 | JP |
2003-536144 | Dec 2003 | JP |
2004-517377 | Jun 2004 | JP |
2004-185172 | Jul 2004 | JP |
2005-071522 | Mar 2005 | JP |
2005-517238 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2005-539469 | Dec 2005 | JP |
2006-515009 | May 2006 | JP |
WO 0007310 | Feb 2000 | WO |
WO 0045291 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0058963 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0113311 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 0125948 | Apr 2001 | WO |
WO 01 46783 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0153963 | Jul 2001 | WO |
WO 0162004 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0163822 | Aug 2001 | WO |
WO 0195206 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 0231618 | Apr 2002 | WO |
WO 03005145 | Jan 2003 | WO |
WO 03034408 | Apr 2003 | WO |
WO 03058410 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 2004027588 | Apr 2004 | WO |
WO 2004061547 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2004070538 | Aug 2004 | WO |
WO 2005106876 | Nov 2005 | WO |
WO 2006019608 | Feb 2006 | WO |
WO 2006058149 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2008070062 | Jun 2008 | WO |
WO 2007055845 | Jul 2008 | WO |
Entry |
---|
M. Nilsson, “ID3 tag version 2.4.0—Native Frames, ”XP002350036, ID3V2.4.0-frames.txt, v 1.1, retrieved from the internet: http:www/id3.org3v2.4.0-frames.txt (Nov. 1, 2000). |
R. Mori, et al., “Superdistribution: An Electronic Infrastructure for the Economy of the Future,” XP002072402, Transactions of Information Processing Society of Japan, vol. 38, No. 7, pp. 1465-1472 (Jul. 1997). |
“Wikipedia: FairPlay”, Wikipedia, The Free Encyclopedia (Online) XP002414372, 4 pages (Oct. 11, 2005). |
PCT Notification Concerning Transmittal of International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Chapter 1 of the Patent Cooperation Treaty for PCT Counterpart Application No. PCT/US2006/039107 Containing International Search Report, (Jul. 10, 2008). |
PCT Invitation to Pay Additional Fees for PCT Counterpart Application No. PCT/US2006/039107, Containing Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search Report (Feb. 15, 2007). |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority or The Declaration for PCT Counterpart Application No. PCT/US05/024212 Containing the International Search Report (Nov. 8, 2005). |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority or The Declaration for PCT Counterpart Application No. PCT/US2006/039107 Containing the International Search Report (Nov. 20, 2007). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/337,598, mailed Feb. 18, 2011, 10 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/337,598, mailed Sep. 6, 2011, 13 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/337,600, mailed Jul. 8, 2011, 15 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/252,926, mailed May 24, 2011, 15 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/252,926, mailed Oct. 7, 2011, 16 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/252,941, mailed May 10, 2011, 12 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/252,941, mailed Jul. 25, 2011, 3 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,586, mailed Oct. 3, 2011, 20 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,606, mailed Jun. 20, 2011, 15 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,606, mailed Jan. 26, 2012, 19 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/607,163, mailed Aug. 18, 2011, 17 pgs. |
Office Action for Israel Application No. 180559, mailed Jul. 20, 2011, 5 pgs. (including English Language Summary of the Office Action). |
Office Action for Australian Application No. 2010257287, mailed Jun. 27, 2011, 2 pgs. |
Tony Bove, “The iPod Companion”, Muska & Lipman, 27 pgs. (including Table of Contents, ix, 1-21, 3, and 80), (2003). |
Antonin Billet, “PDA: le Sypod veut séduire par le multimédia”, retrieved from the Internet: http://www.01net.com/editorial/175530/pda-le-sypod-veut-seduire-par-le-multimedia/, 3 pgs. (including Google translation), (Feb. 2, 2004). |
“Songs-DB 1.3”, Soft32, retrieved from the Internet http://songs-db.soft32.com/, 5 pgs., (Jun. 14, 2003). |
Internetnews.com Staff, “Songcatcher Snatches Tunes From Live Radio”, retrieved from the Internet http://www.internetnews.com/ec-news/print.php/532651, 1 pg., (Dec. 12, 2000). |
PCT Notification of Transmittal of the International Search Report and the Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, or the Declaration for PCT Application No. PCT/US12/26408, 13 pgs., (Aug. 10, 2012). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/337,598, mailed Oct. 1, 2012, 13 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/252,926, mailed Apr. 4, 2012, 15 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/200,586, mailed Jun. 14, 2012, 14 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/607,163 mailed May 22, 2012, 16 pgs. |
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2010-199652, mailed Apr. 5, 2012, 6 pgs. (including English Translation of the Office Action). |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,626,314, mailed May 16, 2012, 3 pgs. |
Office Action for Australian Application No. 2010257287, mailed Apr. 2, 2012, 2 pgs. |
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 2011-016355, mailed Aug. 16, 2012, 10 pgs. (including English translation of the Office Action). |
Office Action for Canadian Application No. 2,784,879, mailed Dec. 6, 2012, 4 pgs. |
Office Action for European Application No. 06825548.8, mailed Jul. 31, 2012, 4 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/336,443, mailed Oct. 4, 2004. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/336,443, mailed May 17, 2005. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/336,443, mailed Oct. 21, 2005. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/336,443, mailed May 31, 2006. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/708,997, mailed Feb. 9, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/708,997, mailed Sep. 28, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,581, mailed Jun. 27, 2008. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,581, mailed Feb. 18, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,581, mailed Aug. 14, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,581, mailed Feb. 4, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,581, mailed Jul. 20, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/252,926, mailed Oct. 6, 2010. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/261,687, mailed Oct. 20, 2008. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/261,687, mailed Jul. 9, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/261,687, mailed Oct. 27, 2009. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,606, mailed Apr. 14, 2008. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,606, mailed Oct. 27, 2008. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/997,606, mailed Jun. 26, 2009. |
Office Action for Australian Application No. 2005275431, mailed Feb. 11, 2010. |
Office Action for European Application No. 05769589.2, mailed Jul. 29, 2010. |
Office Action for Israel Application No. 180559, mailed May 11, 2010. |
Office Action for Israel Application No. 200109, mailed May 3, 2010. |
Office Action for Israel Application No. 200110, mailed May 6, 2010. |
PCS Electronics, “RDS Max 2.0”, XP002336990, retrieved from the Internet: http://web.archive.org/web/20040413050058/www.ppcs-electronics.com/en/products.php?EDS—encod>, 3 pgs., (Mar. 22, 2004). |
Amazon.com Description, “HP Jordana 545 Pocket PC”, XP002336991, retrieved from the Internet: http:www.pdasupport.com/Jordana545.htm>, 3 pgs., (Apr. 2000). |
Richard Menta, et al., “Review: Neuros MP3 Digital Audio Computer”, MP3newswire.net, XP002336992, retrieved from the Internet: http://www.mp3newswire.net/stories/2003/neuros.html>, 6 pgs., (May 29, 2003). |
Philips Research, “Audio Fingerprinting for Automatic Music Recognition”, XP002347089, retrieved from the Internet: http://www.research.philips.com/initiatives/contentid/downloads/audio—fingerprinting—leaflet.pdf>, 2 pgs., (Mar. 2004). |
Jaap Haitsma, et al., “A Highly Robust Audio Fingerprinting System”, XP002347090, IRCAM, retrieved from the Internet: http://ismir2002.ismir.net/proceedings/02-FP04-2.pdf, 9 pgs., (2002). |
Internet Article, “IPOD Track Display”, XP00236993, retrieved from the Internet: http://halfbakery.com/idea/IPOD—20track—20display>, 2 pgs., (Sep. 18, 2003). |
Internet Article, “MINI2 Forums—RDS—Radio Text”, XP002336994, retrieved from the Internet: http://www.mini2.com/forum/archive/index.php/t-24296>, 3 pgs., (Feb. 7, 2003). |
Internet Article, “Digiana AudiaX FM Linker”, XP002337103, retrieved from the Internet: http://www.i4u.com/article396.html>, 1 pg., (May 30, 2003). |
“Gotuit Media Secures $2.1 Million in First-Round Angel Funding Led by Topol Group”, PR Newswire, pNA, The Gale Group, 2 pgs., (Aug. 15, 2000). |
Julie Strietelmeier, “Gadgeteer Hands on Review: Apple iPod (3rd Generation 30GB Model)”, The Gadgeteer, retrieved from the Internet on Jun. 21, 2008: http://web.archive.org/web/20030622180433/www.the-gadgeteer.com/apple-ipod-30gb-review.html, 10 pgs., (Jun. 6, 2003). |
Staff, “Griffin Technology Ships New iTrip for 3rd Generation iPods”, The Mac Observer, retrieved from the Internet on Jun. 21, 2008: http://web.archive.org/web/20040109234748/http://www.macobserver.com/article/2003/10/08.5shtml, 2 pgs., (Oct. 8, 2003). |
David Carey, “Apple's iPod Packs a Pricey Punch”, TechOnline, retrieved from the Internet on Feb. 13, 2009: http://www.techonlinen.com/article/printArticle.jhtml?articleID=193100821, 3 pgs., (Mar. 26, 2002). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/252,941, mailed Nov. 12, 2010, 12 pgs. |
Action for Japanese Application No. 521512/2007, mailed May 18, 2010, 8 pgs. (including English Language Summary of the Office Action). |
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 521512/2007, mailed Nov. 16, 2010, 5 pgs. (including English Language Summary of the Office Action). |
Office Action for Japanese Application No. 537730/2008, mailed Oct. 5, 2010, 8 pgs. (including English Language Summary of the Office Action). |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 10/829,581, mailed Feb. 2, 2011, 13 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/337,600, mailed Jan. 24, 2011, 15 pgs. |
Office Action for Israel Application No. 180559, mailed May 11, 2010, 4 pgs. (including English Language Summary of the Office Action). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050065624 A1 | Mar 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10829581 | Apr 2004 | US |
Child | 10893473 | US | |
Parent | 10336443 | Jan 2003 | US |
Child | 10829581 | US |