This method relates to a system and method System for monitoring the position of a measuring unit when placed on a person, especially as part of a CPR measurement.
Quality of cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR), defined as chest compressions and ventilations, is essential for the outcome of cardiac arrest. Gallagher, Van Hoeyweghen and Wik, (Gallagher et al; JAMA 1995 Dec. 27; 274(24):1922-5. Van Hoeyweghen et al; Resuscitation 1993 Aug. 26(1):47-52; Wik L, et al Resuscitation” 1994; 28:195-203) respectively show that good quality CPR, performed by bystanders prior to the arrival of the ambulance personnel, can affect survival with a factor 3-4. But unfortunately, CPR is most often delivered with less than optimal quality, even by health care professionals according to a recent study published in JAMA (Wik et al. Quality of Cardiopulmonary Resuscitation During Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest. Jama, Jan. 19, 2005-Vol 293, No 3). The most common failures are: Chest compressions are not delivered, ventilations are not delivered, chest compression depth is too shallow, chest compression rate is too high or too low, ventilation rate is too high or too low, or inflation time is too fast.
The 2005 international consensus on science, published in Resuscitation, volume 67, 2005 express in detail how CPR should be delivered in order to be effective, and how CPR and defibrillation should be used together. Chest compression guidelines are uniform for all adult and older child patients: Depth should be at least 4-5 cm, rate should be at least 100/min, and rescuers should release pressure fully between compressions. In reality however there are large individual differences between the necessary compressions depths and forces depending on such things as the size of the patient. Thus the guidelines may in some cases result in suboptimal treatment.
In EP1057451, Myklebust describe a sensor to measure chest compressions. This sensor is arranged with an accelerometer and a force activated switch. Part of the system is also means to estimate chest compression movement as a function of acceleration and signals from the force activated switch. One limitation by this sensor is that it does not provide means of reliably detecting that each chest compressions were completely released (limited by the sensitivity of the force switch). One further limitation of this technology is that the precision of the system depends on what surface the patient is lying on. For instance, when the patient is lying on a mattress, the sensor on top of the chest will measure both the movement of the patient on the mattress and the compression of the chest. Similar discussions are made in US2004/0210172 and in WO2006/006871 where accelerometers are used to monitor the movements of the bed. Until now this problem usually has been solved by adding a stiff plate beneath the patient, but even then there is evidence that much of the downward force applied leads to compression of the mattress as well as the chest, meaning that a single accelerometer on top of the chest will over-estimate chest compression depth as it measures both the compression of the mattress and the chest. A solution to this problem is provided in US2004/267325 where two coils are used to measure the relative distance between them, a first of them transmitting a varying magnetic field that is picked up by the second coil on the opposite side of a patient. I problem related to this solution is that the transmitted magnetic field will vary to a great extent due to metallic objects in the surrounding. Adapted filtering is suggested in US2004/267325 but this will not provide sufficient signal quality under all situations thus reducing the accuracy of the measurements.
Thus it is an object of this invention to provide an accurate means for monitoring the compression of the chest of a patient relative to the back of the patient, especially during CPR, so as to provide information both about the compression depth and the dimensions of the chest, i.e. chest to back dimension, between the compressions, making it possible also to detect whether the pressure applied to the chest is completely released between the compressions. This object is obtained using as described above and characterized as stated in the independent claims.
The invention is based on detection of the strength of an oscillating magnetic field generated in a drive unit preferably positioned at the back of the patient, where the measuring unit is positioned on the chest. This way the measurements are made indifferent of the movements of the drive unit, so that even if the mattress is compressed during the CPR it does not affect the measurements. As the detection of magnetic field is a well know and fairly simple technology the measuring device may be simple, e.g. of the same size as the corresponding devices to be positioned on the chest of the patient described in the publications mentioned above comprising force sensors and/or accelerometers.
As the measured characteristic is the distance between the measuring unit positioned on the chest and the backboard at the back of the patient the system according to the invention also provides a means for measuring the chest dimensions in other situations than during compressions, and it also will system will also provide information about chest “molding” which means permanent change in chest-back dimension caused by chest collapse, for example due to mechanical stress from CPR.
The invention will be described in detail below with reference to the accompanying drawings, illustrating the invention by way of a number of examples.
In
As the system is to be used on patients the frequency range of the varying magnetic field preferably should be in a range where the water in body of the patient does not affect the measurements significantly, and should thus be in the range of 50-100 kHz. Other ranges may be possible but will require calibration depending on the effect of the material affecting the magnetic field strength.
The drive unit 2 in
As may be seen from
As is well known the measured field strength will depend on the distance from between the drive coil 2 and the measuring unit 1, and the resulting measurements is illustrated in
Other ways to obtain a uniform field within the working area of the measuring unit 1 are illustrated in
In
In the examples shown in
In
In the drawings discussed above the generated magnetic field has a direction 7 essentially perpendicular to the backboard 2 and in the direction from the backboard toward the working area of the measuring unit. In
The measuring unit is illustrated in
Other means for measuring the magnetic field both in the measuring unit 1 and secondary field sensor 5 in the drive unit 2 may also be contemplated, such as Hall effect sensors, and as alternatives to the conductor transferring the measured signals other communication means may also be used such as optical or radio signals. In the case of a cordless communication system the measuring unit may be provided with a chargeable battery coupled to a battery charger or using a charging unit extracting energy from the magnetic field. It is also possible to transmit signals to the measuring unit through the generated magnetic field, for example by modulating the frequency and filtering the received signal at the measuring unit.
To summarize the invention relates to a system using an AC magnetic field for measuring of distance from back(board) to chest(sensor). The system is both capable of measuring both static distance (AP) and modulation (depth) using a frequency where no absorption in water is present.
As mentioned above the system according to the invention uses a secondary field sensor, e.g. a second coil, to minimize effect of metal and to stabilize the field strength by measuring the field. The secondary sensor is in the same position as the drive coil, e.g. in a backboard and coupled to means for adjusting the generated field so that the field strength in this position is at a suitable level. In addition to the discussions above this also provide a possibility for maintaining the field strength at a minimal value reducing any risks related to higher field strengths while maintaining sufficient strength to provide sufficient accuracy. A level less than 1.63 A/m, is considered a safe level at frequencies in the range of 100 kHz.
A metal plate may also be provided under the backboard drive coil in order to minimize effect of metal.
One or more accelerometers may be used in the in the measuring unit (and/or backboard) in order to compensate for “tilt” in one or more directions.
The system may use the magnetic AC field for communication between board and sensor by modulation of the field, or a radio communication between board and sensor for communication of various information such as board tilt, presence of metal, board operational status, etc.
In order to minimize the energy consumption of the system the drive coils is a resonance drive of the drive coil. Various coil solutions and methods may be chosen and in addition to the use of AC magnetic field acceleration sensors may also be used for measuring the movements of the measuring unit, i.e. the compression depth. In this case acceleration units may also be provided in the backboard to monitor the movements thereof.
The system includes monitoring instruments and software for obtaining information about the measured person or object, and analyzing the information. As discussed above, when used on a person the chest dimensions may be found and also the compression depth during CPR. This analysis may also be adapted to detect changes in the chest dimensions before and after the compressions, in order to detect whether the person performing compressions have released the pressure completely or whether the compressions have made more permanent changes in the chest, e.g. collapsing the chest.
The system may also be adapted to provide visual or acoustic feedback to the user based on the abovementioned analysis, e.g. by indicators on the measuring unit, sound effects or prerecorded voice messages. The measuring unit may be cordless communication by magnetic field or radio and being charged through the magnetic field or a charging receiver where it is positioned when not in use.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20093315 | Nov 2009 | NO | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/EP2010/067095 | 11/9/2010 | WO | 00 | 3/14/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/058001 | 5/19/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4314251 | Raab | Feb 1982 | A |
6062216 | Corn | May 2000 | A |
6306107 | Myklebust et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6323942 | Bamji | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6780017 | Pastrick et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7122014 | Palazzolo et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7402996 | Arai et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7476206 | Palazzolo et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
8175691 | Huldt | May 2012 | B2 |
8192367 | Myklebust et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
20030030342 | Chen et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040082888 | Palazzolo et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040133117 | Eriksen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040210172 | Palazzolo et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040267325 | Geheb et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20070027353 | Ghiron | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070054254 | Cook et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070276300 | Olson et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20080149401 | Hagen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20100022904 | Centen | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100228165 | Centen | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100256539 | Strand et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101018500 | Aug 2007 | CN |
1057451 | Dec 2000 | EP |
1491176 | Dec 2004 | EP |
WO-0215836 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO-2004037154 | May 2004 | WO |
WO-2006006871 | Jan 2006 | WO |
WO-2006088373 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO-2010009531 | Jan 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Knoflacher, Nikolaus, “International Search Report” for PCT/EP2010/067095, as mailed Apr. 12, 2011, 3 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20120191014 A1 | Jul 2012 | US |