Patent Application
20120179392
Twisted cords are a component used in the main body, or casing, of motor vehicle tires. In particular, tire casings incorporates fabrics of polyester, nylon or rayon cords with in the casing rubber compound. These cords are commonly twisted to improve their strength. As part of the tire design and manufacturing process, these cords are subject to various tests to determine their properties under different operating conditions. One common test determines the strain on the twisted cords under various conditions. Such strain tests are commonly performed using a test rig that includes a pair of cord grips at least one of which is movable relative to the other. To perform a test, an end of twisted cord test specimen in placed in each of the cord grips and then the at least one cord grip is moved relative to the other in order to apply a force, or tension, on the twisted cord.
During these tests, the strain on the twisted cord is measured as the change in length of the twisted cord divided by the original length of the twisted cord. The length of the twisted cord is measured as the length between the ends captured in the two cord grips. Thus, the distance between the two cord grips is theoretically equivalent to the length of the twisted cord and is used as a stand-in for cord length in the strain calculation. Unfortunately, there are some problems with this testing method. For example, with many cord grip designs, it can be difficult to determine the precise point at which the twisted cord transitions from being in the cord grip to being between the cord grips. This can lead to ambiguity in measurements of the distance between the cord grips. Additionally, the twisted cord can slip in one or both of the cord grips when the strain is applied. When this slippage occurs, the cord grips move farther apart than the actual distance that the twisted cord has been stretched. Because the distance between the cord grips is no longer equivalent to the strained length of the twisted cord, the strain measurement is inaccurate. Moreover, whether any slippage occurred and the amount of slippage is very difficult to determine making the magnitude of the inaccuracy in the strain measurement hard to estimate. Further, during strain testing at elevated temperatures, expansion of the metal parts in the cord grips can introduce more ambiguity into the strain measurements. The behavior of the twisted cord in the area of the cord grips is not well known. As a result, there can be significant uncertainty regarding the accuracy of the strain measurements using this method.
Referring to
In order to determine the strain on the twisted cord test specimen 11 that results from moving the at least one cord grip, the system 10 is configured to optically measure the number of cord twists per unit length in both the original un-tensioned state and in the tensioned state. As the tension increases, the cord 11 undergoes positive strain and elongates. This decreases the number of twists per unit length. The change in twists per unit length is directly related to strain as described in more detail below. To this end, the system 10 includes a digital camera 14 for producing image data reflective of the number of twists in at least a segment of the twisted cord 11 held in the cord grips 12. The digital camera 14 preferably can be fixed in a desired position and is oriented such that the cord 11 is either horizontal or vertical in the image produced by the camera 14. As will be understood by those skilled in the art, any standard machine vision camera could be used as the digital camera 14 in the system 11.
The relationship between strain and the number of twists per unit length can be explained as follows:
Given a unit length of 1024 pixels, which corresponds to the image height;
Original Length: TW0=number of twists/1024 pixels;
Original pixels/twist: L0=1024 pixels/number of twists;
Strained Length: TW1=number of twists/1024 pixels;
Strained pixels/twist: L1=1024 pixels/number of twists;
Strain=(L1−L0)/L0=(L1/L0−L0/L0)=L1/L0−1;
Substituting 1/TW for L;
Strain=TW0/TW1−1
Thus, for a twisted cord test specimen: Strain=Original Number of Twists/Strained Number of Twists −1. Using this formula, strain can be determined from analyzing the image data of the twisted cord so as to determine the number of twists shown in the image.
Advantageously, because the system 10 can be setup to measure the number of cord twists in a segment of the twisted cord 11 between the cord grips 12 that is not held by the cord grips, the system 11 can eliminate the ambiguities in the test results that are caused by slippage in the cord grips when cord grip spacings are used to determine original and strained cord lengths. In this respect, the system 10 and testing method of the invention can be completely non-contacting. Moreover, unlike some non-contacting strain measurement methods, the system 10 and method of the invention do not require gauge marks or targets to be applied to the twisted cord 11. The twisted cords being tested are typically quite narrow making it difficult to apply such marks and the need to apply marks in preparation for testing can make the testing process much more complicated and time consuming. Moreover, the solvents used in the marking process may alter the properties of the twisted cord being tested.
To facilitate the capture of a digital image of sufficient quality, the system 10 can include a light source 16, as shown in
The digital camera 14 should have an appropriate lens and filter to produce the desired image quality. Considerations concerning the selection of a lens include the distance between the camera 14 and the twisted cord test specimen 11 and the length of the twisted cord 11 that is being imaged. For instance, if the testing is going to be performed at elevated temperature inside of an oven, the camera 14 may need to be arranged outside of the oven, which may require the camera to be at a greater distance from the test specimen 11. When doing measurements inside of an oven, the light source can be arranged inside or outside of the oven.
For providing data that reflects the force or tension applied on the twisted cord test specimen 11 held in the cord grips 12, the system 10 can include a force sensor 18 configured and arranged to measure the force applied on the twisted cord 11. In the illustrated embodiment, the force sensor 18 comprises a load cell that is arranged in proximity to one of the cord grips 12. Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other methods and arrangements can be used to determine the force applied on the twisted cord.
In order to process the image data produced by the digital camera 14, the system includes a data processor, in this case a computer 20, that is in communication with the digital camera 14. The computer 20 is configured to take the image data associated with individual images taken by the digital camera 14 and process the data so as to produce a measurement of the number of cord twists shown in the image. The computer 20 can then use the number of cord twists to calculate strain on the twisted cord 11. In particular, as noted above, the strain can be determined by analyzing an image taken by the digital camera 14 before a tension is applied to the twisted cord 11 and an image taken after the desired tension is applied to the twisted cord 11. In each case, the computer 20 analyzes the image data to determine the number of cord twists per unit length shown in the image of the twisted cord 11. Assuming the unit length used is the same in the un-tensioned and tensioned images, the strain can be calculated from a ratio of the number of twists determined by the computer 20 from the original un-tensioned image to the number of twists determined by the computer 20 from the tensioned image. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, a slight pretension or load must be applied to the twisted cord in order to remove any slack and ensure that the twisted cord is straight.
The force sensor 18 can also be in communication with the computer 20, as shown in
The steps of an exemplary testing method according to the invention, which can be performed using the testing system 10 of
The system and method of the present invention can be used to perform a variety of different strain related tests including creep tests and hysteresis loss tests involving cyclic loading and unloading of a twisted cord. These tests can be short or long term. Advantageously, the system and method of the present invention can be configured to gather and analyze the image data quickly enough so that dynamic strain testing can be conducted. For example, the system 10 can be configured to operate in a 20-30 Hz frequency range, i.e. gathering and analyzing 20-30 images per second. Those skilled in the art will understand that a variety of different methods may be used to program the computer 20 to analyze the image data to determine the number of twists per unit length shown in the image. According to one preferred embodiment, the computer 20 can be programmed to employ a fast Fourier transform (FFT) based analysis of the image pixel lines to calculate the number of cord twists per unit length. This method is particularly advantageous because it can analyze the image data very rapidly while still producing a very accurate count of the number of twists in a particular image.
According to one preferred embodiment, National Instruments PXI hardware (available from National Instruments Corp. of Austin, Tex.) is used for acquiring the image data and transferring it to the computer and LabVIEW software (also available from National Instruments) is used for analysis of the data. The MathScript node within LabVIEW provides one method for analyzing the image data so as to determine the number of twists in the image. One example of the steps that can be set-up using MathScript are set forth below. These steps were developed using MATLAB software (available from MathWorks, Inc. of Natick, Mass.) but can be implemented using MathScript in LabVIEW:
Other FFT based LabVIEW functions that could also be used to analyze the image data to determine the number of twists in the image include FFT Spectrum (Mag-Phase), FFT Power Spectrum, Extract Single Tone Information and Tone Measurements Express. A non-FFT based function that could be used is Signal Operation. To use the latter function, the image data signals need to be relatively clean. This may require the signals to be filtered to remove higher frequency noise and possibly a low frequency undulation if the cord is not uniformly illuminated or uniformly reflective. With a clean signal, the Signal Operation function would provide the position or spacing of the peaks and/or valleys. The average of the spacings would be the cord twist density. As will be appreciated by those skilled in the art, the selection of function can involve a trade-off between computational speed or the availability of input or output parameters.
While the present invention has been disclosed and described in connection with the testing of twisted cords used in body casings of motor vehicle tires, those skilled in the art will appreciate that system and method of the present invention is also applicable to the testing of twisted cords used in applications other than tires.
All references, including publications, patent applications, and patents, cited herein are hereby incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each reference were individually and specifically indicated to be incorporated by reference and were set forth in its entirety herein.
The use of the terms “a” and “an” and “the” and similar referents in the context of describing the invention (especially in the context of the following claims) are to be construed to cover both the singular and the plural, unless otherwise indicated herein or clearly contradicted by context. The terms “comprising,” “having,” “including,” and “containing” are to be construed as open-ended terms (i.e., meaning “including, but not limited to,”) unless otherwise noted. Recitation of ranges of values herein are merely intended to serve as a shorthand method of referring individually to each separate value falling within the range, unless otherwise indicated herein, and each separate value is incorporated into the specification as if it were individually recited herein. All methods described herein can be performed in any suitable order unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context. The use of any and all examples, or exemplary language (e.g., “such as”) provided herein, is intended merely to better illuminate the invention and does not pose a limitation on the scope of the invention unless otherwise claimed. No language in the specification should be construed as indicating any non-claimed element as essential to the practice of the invention.
Preferred embodiments of this invention are described herein, including the best mode known to the inventors for carrying out the invention. Variations of those preferred embodiments may become apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art upon reading the foregoing description. The inventors expect skilled artisans to employ such variations as appropriate, and the inventors intend for the invention to be practiced otherwise than as specifically described herein. Accordingly, this invention includes all modifications and equivalents of the subject matter recited in the claims appended hereto as permitted by applicable law. Moreover, any combination of the above-described elements in all possible variations thereof is encompassed by the invention unless otherwise indicated herein or otherwise clearly contradicted by context.
