The present disclosure relates in general to storage for computing systems and, more particularly, to a method and system for migrating data to a build-to-order computing system.
A user can have several reasons for replacing an existing computing system such as a personal computer (“PC”). For example, the computing system may experience a hardware fault that requires replacement. Alternately, the user may desire to upgrade to a computing system with better performance characteristics.
Replacing an existing computing system presents a problem, however, with respect to data stored on the existing system. The user often wishes to maintain the data, and migrate the data to the new computing system.
Therefore, it is desirable for the user to have a backup, or copy, of the data stored on the existing computing system. For example, such a copy, or “image”, can comprise data stored on the hard drive of an existing computing system. The user can then copy the image onto the new computing system. In such a way, a user moves his personal data to the new computing system.
However, several problems arise with this process. For example, a user cannot always predict the need to procure a new PC. A user cannot predict a failure, and it is possible such a failure will prohibit access to the user's data on the existing PC. Therefore, a user must institute a diligent backup process, such that in an event of a failure, the user can revert to the “last known good” data. Such diligence is time consuming and inconvenient.
Another problem is that storage of the backup may require large amounts of storage space, which can be cost prohibitive. Furthermore, storage of the backup on the user's premises does not protect the data from problems such as theft, fire, or corruption, that can occur at the user's premises.
Even if the customer overcomes these difficulties and maintains an image of the existing data, the copying of the image to the new computing system is labor intensive. There can be large amounts of data, requiring an inconvenient amount of time.
A related problem is the event of a software failure. It is possible that such a failure, for example an operating system (“OS”) failure, will prohibit access to the user's computing system. It is further possible that replacing the OS with the last known good version will fix the failure. However, even if the user has access to an image including the last-known-good version of the OS, the failure may prevent the user from copying the image onto the computing system.
There exists conventional solutions to some of the above problems. For example, there are conventional backup utilities that can store an image of the user's computing system on tapes, floppy disks, or other removable media. There also exists a conventional backup utility that can store an image at a remote site over the Internet.
However, none of the above conventional solutions address the inconvenience encountered by a user that desires to upgrade his computing system yet maintain his own data. Furthermore, the conventional solutions do not address the situation where a software failure prevents restoring the computing system to the last known good configuration.
In accordance with the present embodiment, a method and system for migrating data to a build-to-order computing system are disclosed that provide significant advantages over prior developed systems. The embodiment allows a user to upgrade to a new computing system, or repair an existing computing system, without losing existing data.
According to one aspect of the present embodiment, a method comprises storing an image at a remote site. The image comprises data stored on a first computing system. An order is received to provide a second computing system to a customer. Access to the image is provided to the second computing system such that the second computing system can store the image.
More specifically, one embodiment of the method includes storing the image on a medium integrated into the second computing system.
Another embodiment of the method comprises installing a partition on the second computing system. The partition is operable to: boot the second computing system, have the second computing system establish a connection to the remote site, and have the second computing system download the image.
According to another aspect of one embodiment, a system comprises a remote site for storing an image. The image comprises data stored on a computing system. An order engine comprises executable instructions running on a computing platform. The order engine is operable to receive an order to provide a second computing system to a customer. A storage engine interfaces with the order engine. The storage engine comprises executable instructions running on a computing platform. The storage engine is operable to provide access to the image by the second computing system such that the second computing system can store the image.
It is a technical advantage that off-site storage of an image comprising data stored on the computing system is allowed. This protects the user's data in the event of hardware failure, fire, theft, or other corruption. The off-site storage also allows for a sharing of storage resources between many users, leading to a lower cost to the user.
Another technical advantage is that storage of an image of the use's computing system can be performed periodically. This makes it easier to return to a “last known good” software state if necessary.
It is another technical advantage that a boot-to-web partition can be installed on the user's computing system. In the event the computing system experiences a failure, the computing system can boot-to-web and recover an image of the data stored on the computing system before the failure occurred. This allows a return to the “last known good” software state of the computing system.
It is a further technical advantage time is saved associated with upgrading to a new computing system. The embodiment allows a user to upgrade, change, or even duplicate an existing system, without having to take the time to load the new computing system with data from the existing computing system.
Another advantage is that an improved a “build-to-order” computer manufacturing process is possible. A manufacturer can take an order from a customer for a new computing system, and load the new computing system with an image of data particular to that customer.
Other technical advantages should be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art in view of the specification, claims, and drawings.
A more complete may be acquired by referring to the following description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which like reference numbers indicate like features, and wherein:
A user site 14 interfaces with remote site 22 and factory site 30. A first computing system 15 resides at user site 14. In the embodiment of
Remote site 22 includes storage 26. Factory site 30 includes computing platform 34. Computing platform can be, for example, a high end workstation, a file server, or other computing device. Executable instructions running on computing platform 34 include an order engine 35 and a storage engine 36 interfaced with order engine 35. In the embodiment of
In operation, first computing system 15 communicates with remote site 22 through a network 18. Network 18 can comprise for example, the Internet, an intranet, dedicated line, or other communication system. Such communication can occur with the use of a modem coupled to first computing system 15 and interfacing with network 18. Through such communication, remote site 22 stores an image 27 comprising data stored on hard drive 16 onto storage 26. A mechanism to uniquely identify the source of image 27 is included onto storage 26. The present embodiment can also encrypt image 27 to secure the data contained within image 27.
One example of such a storage mechanism can be a periodic, automatic update system. Periodically, such as every night or other user-definable time period, first computing system 15 creates a connection to remote site 22 and storage 26. Storage 26 then stores an image 27 of data on first computing system 15. After remote site 22 stores the first such image 27, subsequent stores can be incremental, meaning only changed data on first computing system 15 is stored into image 27. This embodiment provides several advantages to the user. The fact that image 27 is stored remote from user site 14 protects the user's data from catastrophes such as fire and theft. Additionally, the automatic nature of the on-line storage reduces the diligence required of the user and the inconvenience placed upon the user.
Further in operation, the user makes an order 39 for a second computing system. For example, the user may desire to replace first computing system 15. In the embodiment of
Storage engine 36 interfaces with order engine 35 and provides access to image 27 by second computing system 37. The present embodiment contemplates storage engine 36 providing such access through several mechanisms.
One such mechanism is to store image 27 onto a medium integrated with second computing system 37. For example, storage engine 36 could create a connection to remote site 22 through network 18. Storage engine 36 then identifies image 27 through the unique identifier associated with first computing system 15, and communicated through order 39. Storage engine 36 then downloads image 27 and stores image 27 onto a hard drive 38 integrated into second computing system 27. Second computing system 37 can then be shipped to the user. The user now has an upgraded computing system that includes image 27 of the data from first computing system 15.
Alternately, storage engine 36 could store image 27 onto a medium accessible by second computing system 37. For example, storage engine 36 could store image 27 onto a compact disc 42. Second computing system 37 and compact disc 42 is then shipped to the user.
Further indicated by
As indicated by
In operation, image 27 is stored at remote site in storage 26, as in the embodiment of
In operation, as in the embodiment of
Partition 64 can comprise, for example, a boot-to-web partition. One such partition could include the functionality as described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/377,726, entitled “Method and System for Automated Technical Support for Computers”, filed by Thomas Vrhel, Jr., et al. on Aug. 19, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,560,726 which is incorporated herein by reference.
Further in operation, second computing system 60 is shipped to customer site 59. Once at customer site 59, a user applies power to second computing system 60. Partition 64 recognizes a condition that has been set at factory site 30. For example, the condition can include the unique identifier associated with image 27. Partition 64 boots second computing system 60 and establishes a connection to remote site 22. For example, partition 64 could include a skeleton operating system operable to operate a modem and connect second computing system 60 to remote site 22. Second computing system 60 can then download and store image 27.
In addition to the convenience offered to a user for upgrading a computing system, the embodiment of
At step 88, an order is received to provide a second computing system to the user. The order can include, for example, a request that the image be provided to the second computing system that has been ordered. The order also includes a unique identifier associated with the image.
Step 92 and 94 provide alternate methods for providing access to the image by the second computing system. In step 92, the image is stored on a medium integrated with the second computing system. For example, the medium can comprise a hard drive integrated into the second computing system. At step 94, the image is stored on a medium accessible by the second computing system but not integrated with the second computing system. For example, at step 94 a image can be stored on a compact disc.
At step 98 the second computing system is shipped to the customer. If progressing from step 94, the compact disc is shipped with the second computing system. Therefore, by the end of the method at step 99, the customer receives the second computing system which includes the data that from the user's previous system.
At step 106, a partition is installed on the second computing system. The partition is operable to boot the second computing system and have the second computing system establish a connection to the remote site. Further, as discussed with respect to partition 64 of
At step 108 the second computing system which includes the partition is shipped to the customer. At step 110, the user provides power to the second computing system. At step 112 the partition boots the second computing system, establishes a connection to the remote site, and downloads the image such that the image is stored on the second computing system. The method ends step 114 wherein the user has in his possession a computing system that includes the image of data from the user's previous computing system.
At step 124, a connection is made between a customer site storage and the remote site. For example, the customer site storage can comprise a server or other user site storage system. At step 128, the image is downloaded from the remote site to the customer site storage. At step 130, the image is downloaded from the customer site storage to the second computing system. The method ends at step 132.
The method of
The advantages of the present embodiment include providing a build-to-order computing system to a user, while maintaining the user's data from a previous computing system. Additionally, the present embodiment provides such a build-to-order computing system with a minimum of inconvenience to the user.
Although the present embodiment has been described in detail, it should be understood that various changes, substitutions and alterations can be made thereto without departing from the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/745,175 now U.S. Pat. No. 6,912,552 entitled “Method and System for Migrating Stored Data to a Build-to-Order Computing System” filed Dec. 23, 2003, by Edward A. Hubbard, et al.; which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No 09/378,020 entitled “Method and System for Migrating Stored Data to a Build-to-Order Computing System” filed Aug. 19, 1999 by Edward A. Hubbard, et al., now U.S. Pat. No. 6,760,708.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4253178 | Kolaczia | Feb 1981 | A |
4356545 | West | Oct 1982 | A |
4438458 | Munscher | Mar 1984 | A |
4491914 | Sujaku | Jan 1985 | A |
4627060 | Huang et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4635187 | Baron et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
4788658 | Hanebuth | Nov 1988 | A |
4809280 | Shonaka | Feb 1989 | A |
4916699 | Ohashi | Apr 1990 | A |
4964077 | Eisen et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5010551 | Goldsmith et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5017030 | Crews | May 1991 | A |
5060135 | Levine et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5196993 | Herron et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5214695 | Arnold et al. | May 1993 | A |
5224024 | Tu et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5228655 | Garcia et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5276805 | Hamaguchi | Jan 1994 | A |
5287448 | Nicol et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5287505 | Calvert et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5325521 | Koyama et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5346410 | Moore, Jr. | Sep 1994 | A |
5348408 | Gelardi et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353240 | Mallory et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5355357 | Yamamori et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5356099 | Sereboff | Oct 1994 | A |
5367667 | Wahlquist et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5374018 | Daneshvar | Dec 1994 | A |
5375800 | Wilcox et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
5381526 | Ellson | Jan 1995 | A |
5388032 | Gill et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5390324 | Burckhartt et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5392095 | Siegel | Feb 1995 | A |
5398333 | Schieve et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5410447 | Miyagawa et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5422751 | Lewis et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5423605 | Liu | Jun 1995 | A |
5432927 | Grote et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5443237 | Stadtmauer | Aug 1995 | A |
5450576 | Kennedy | Sep 1995 | A |
5454080 | Fasig et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5455933 | Schieve et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5471674 | Stewart et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5483437 | Tang | Jan 1996 | A |
5503484 | Louis | Apr 1996 | A |
5513319 | Finch et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5522572 | Copeland et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526180 | Rausnitz | Jun 1996 | A |
5530847 | Schieve et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5537585 | Blickenstaff et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5537618 | Boulton et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5547154 | Kirchoff et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5547272 | Paterson et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5564054 | Bramnick et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5592362 | Ohgami et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596481 | Liu et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596482 | Horikoshi | Jan 1997 | A |
5627964 | Reynolds et al. | May 1997 | A |
5649200 | Leblang et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5668992 | Hammer et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5678002 | Fawcett et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5680640 | Ofek et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5689253 | Hargreaves et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5689706 | Rao et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5694293 | Seto et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5708776 | Kikinis | Jan 1998 | A |
5708812 | Van Dyke et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5724224 | Howell et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727163 | Bezos | Mar 1998 | A |
5732268 | Bizzarri | Mar 1998 | A |
5748877 | Dollahite et al. | May 1998 | A |
5759644 | Stanley | Jun 1998 | A |
5768370 | Maatta et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5775822 | Cheng | Jul 1998 | A |
5778372 | Cordell et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790796 | Sadowsky | Aug 1998 | A |
5796579 | Nakajima et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5797281 | Fox | Aug 1998 | A |
5803416 | Hanson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805882 | Cooper et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809248 | Vidovic | Sep 1998 | A |
5809511 | Peake | Sep 1998 | A |
5818635 | Hohn et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5819274 | Jackson, Jr. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825355 | Palmer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825506 | Bednar et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826839 | Chen | Oct 1998 | A |
5832522 | Blickenstaff et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5835344 | Alexander | Nov 1998 | A |
5845136 | Babcock | Dec 1998 | A |
5852545 | Pan-Ratzlaff | Dec 1998 | A |
5854828 | Kocis et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5860001 | Cromer et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5860002 | Huang | Jan 1999 | A |
5860012 | Luu | Jan 1999 | A |
5861884 | Fujioka | Jan 1999 | A |
5881236 | Dickey | Mar 1999 | A |
5884073 | Dent | Mar 1999 | A |
5894571 | O'Connor | Apr 1999 | A |
5904327 | Cheng | May 1999 | A |
5905632 | Seto et al. | May 1999 | A |
5906506 | Chang et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909544 | Anderson, II et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5939694 | Holcomb et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5953533 | Fink et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5955797 | Kim | Sep 1999 | A |
5960189 | Stupek, Jr. et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960204 | Yinger et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960411 | Hartman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5963743 | Amberg et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5974546 | Anderson | Oct 1999 | A |
5978911 | Knox et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5983369 | Bakoglu et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991543 | Amberg et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995757 | Amberg et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6006344 | Bell, Jr. | Dec 1999 | A |
6012154 | Poisner | Jan 2000 | A |
6014744 | McKaughan et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6023267 | Chapuis et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029257 | Palmer | Feb 2000 | A |
6029258 | Ahmad | Feb 2000 | A |
6032157 | Tamano et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034869 | Lin | Mar 2000 | A |
6038597 | Van Wyngarden | Mar 2000 | A |
6047261 | Siefert | Apr 2000 | A |
6049342 | Nielson et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049454 | Howell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6050833 | Danzyger et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6056136 | Taber et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061788 | Reynaud et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061810 | Potter | May 2000 | A |
6065136 | Kuwabara | May 2000 | A |
6104874 | Branson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108697 | Raymond et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6112320 | Dien | Aug 2000 | A |
6113050 | Rush | Sep 2000 | A |
6166729 | Acosta et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167383 | Henson | Dec 2000 | A |
6167532 | Wisecup | Dec 2000 | A |
6170065 | Kobata et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182212 | Atkins et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182275 | Beelitz et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6199204 | Donohue | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6202207 | Donohue | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6226412 | Schwab | May 2001 | B1 |
6236901 | Goss | May 2001 | B1 |
6247126 | Beelitz et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256620 | Jawahar et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263215 | Patton et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6272484 | Martin et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279109 | Brundridge | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279125 | Klein | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6279156 | Amberg et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6298443 | Colligan et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6298457 | Rachlin et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6331936 | Hom et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6356977 | Ofek et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6367035 | White | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6385737 | Benignus et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393586 | Sloan et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6449735 | Edwards et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6741737 | Lenoir | May 2004 | B1 |
6760708 | Hubbard et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6912552 | Hubbard et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2065939 | Jul 1981 | GB |
2329266 | Mar 1999 | GB |
2356271 | May 2001 | GB |
2356271 | Sep 2002 | GB |
WO 9300628 | Jan 1993 | WO |
WO 9408289 | Apr 1994 | WO |
WO 9709676 | Mar 1997 | WO |
WO 9818086 | Apr 1998 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050240639 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10745175 | Dec 2003 | US |
Child | 11159529 | US | |
Parent | 09378020 | Aug 1999 | US |
Child | 10745175 | US |