Certain embodiments of the invention relate to security processor systems. More specifically, certain embodiments of the invention relate to a method and system for multi-level security initialization and configuration.
In an increasingly security-conscious world, protecting access to information and/or to systems from unwanted discovery and/or corruption is a major issue for both consumers and businesses. Many consumer or business systems may be vulnerable to unwanted access when the level of security provided within the system is not sufficient for providing the appropriate protection. In this regard, consumer systems, such as multimedia systems, for example, may require the use of integrated architectures that enable security management mechanisms for defining and administering user rights or privileges in order to provide the necessary protection from unwanted access.
An example of a multimedia system that may be accessed by many different users may be a set-top box where manufacturers, vendors, operators, and/or home users may have an interest in accessing at least some limited functionality of the system. In some instances, a single device, such as a security processor for example, may be utilized to administer security operations in the multimedia system. The security processor may operate independently of other components in the multimedia system when determining rights or privileges of different users to various features in the multimedia system. For example, vendors may have limited access to some of the functions that may be accessible by the manufacturer. Home users may only have access to a subset of the vendors' access rights. In some instances, secure operations may be managed by specifying, in a single location, secure conditions for each security component supported by the system.
However, there may be several limitations with such a straightforward implementation. On a typical security system, the number of user modes and security components may be sufficiently large that the size of the security management and/or control information may require large amounts of memory. There may be a significant number of access control entries that may correspond to instances when access rights may not be granted and/or instances when the access rights may be the same for multiple user modes and/or for multiple security components, such as default settings, for example. The addition or removal of user modes or security components may pose various implementation challenges, which increases hardware and/or software complexity. As software and/or hardware complexity grows by, for example, increasing the number of secure components in the security system, it may become more challenging to manage security operations without introducing security breaches or other concerns.
Further limitations and disadvantages of conventional and traditional approaches will become apparent to one of skill in the art, through comparison of such systems with some aspects of the present invention as set forth in the remainder of the present application with reference to the drawings.
A system and/or method is provided for multi-level security initialization and configuration, substantially as shown in and/or described in connection with at least one of the figures, as set forth more completely in the claims.
These and other advantages, aspects and novel features of the present invention, as well as details of an illustrated embodiment thereof, will be more fully understood from the following description and drawings.
Certain embodiments of the invention may be found in a method and system for multi-level security initialization and configuration. Aspects of the invention may comprise a security system that includes a security processor, a host processor, and at least one security component, such as a descrambler. The security processor may enable a security component based on information stored within a non-volatile memory integrated within the security processor. The host processor may enable generation of at least one configuration command communicated to the security processor for configuring the enabled security component. The configuration command may correspond to a security control operational mode for the security component that may indicate, for example, activation or deactivation of the security component. The security processor may authenticate a digital signature in the configuration command. Initialization and configuration may be performed during a system boot sequence of the security system.
A memory controller 106 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, and/or code that may enable accessing data from memory and/or storing data to memory. In this regard, the plurality of memory controllers MC1 1061, . . . , MCK 106K, shown in
An I/O module 108 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, and/or code that may enable communication with devices external to the security system 100. In this regard, the plurality of plurality of I/O modules IOM1 1081, . . . , IOMN 108N, . . . , IOMQ 108Q, described in
The security processor 102 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, and/or code that may enable control, initialization and configuration, and/or management of security operations and/or functionalities in the security system 100. In this regard, the security processor 102 may communicate security information to memory controllers, I/O modules, and/or processing units via the at least one secure bus 112. The security processor 102 may also communicate with the host processor 104 via at least one of the control bus 116 and the data bus 118. In some instances, the security processor 102 may be disabled and the security system 100 may be operated as a multimedia device with minimum security features controlled by the host processor 104. The security processor 102 may also comprise a non-volatile memory (NVM) 102a and/or a read-only memory (ROM) 102b. The NVM 102a may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, and/or code that may be utilized to store information that may be utilized for initialization and configuration of security components in the security system 100. Similarly, the ROM 102b may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, and/or code that may be utilized to store information that may be utilized for initialization and configuration of security components in the security system 100.
The host CPU 104 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, and/or code that may enable control and/or management of operations in the security system 100. In this regard, the host CPU 104 may be utilized for initialization and configuration of security components in the security system 100, such as memory controllers, I/O modules, and/or processing units, for example. The host CPU 104 may communicate with other components in the security system 100 via at least one of the control bus 116 and the data bus 118. In this regard, the host CPU 104 may communicate with the security processor 102 via the control bus 116 and the data bus 118.
The data bus 118 may be utilized for multimedia data transfer between components in the security system 100. The control bus 116 may be utilized for control and initialization and configuration data transfer. For example, the control bus 116 may be utilized to read and/or write to registers. The secure buses 112 may be utilized for security control and configuration data transfer. For example, the secure buses 112 may be utilized to read and/or write to secure registers. In this regard, the secure buses 112 may be communicatively coupled to components of the security system 100 that may require secure registers and/or secure data access. The secure buses 112 may also be utilized for delivery of encryption and/or decryption keys to functional units that require keys for cryptographic operations, such as block cipher operations, for example. For example, the processing unit PUP 100P in
The bus architecture of the security system 100 need not be limited to the exemplary architecture disclosed in
The security system 100 may enable multiple levels for the initialization and configuration of the security components. In this regard, in an exemplary embodiment of the invention, the security system 100 may utilize three discrete security control states for each security system component. The three discrete security control states may correspond to the security component being enabled or disabled, active or inactive, and owned or unowned. The use of three discrete security control states may result in eight possible security control operational modes for each component in the security system 100. Providing any of the eight possible security control operational modes may be achieved, at least in part, by programming the corresponding information in the NVM 102a and/or the ROM 102b in the security processor 102. The security processor 102 and/or the host CPU may be utilized for performing initialization and configuration operations to provide security components with the three discrete security control states that correspond to the appropriate security control operational mode.
The secure register 202 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, and/or code that may enable communicating information with the security processor 102 via the at least one secure bus 112. In this regard, the secure register 202 may only be read and/or be written by the security processor 102. The secure register 202 may be implemented as a single register or as set of registers, for example. The secure register 202 may be specified based initialization and configuration operations and/or functionalities of the processing unit 200. For example, at least one bit in the security register 202 may be utilized for enabling and/or disabling control of security functions in the processing unit 200. At least one bit in the security register 202 may be utilized for activating and/or deactivating control of security functions in the processing unit 200. At least one bit in the security register 202 may be utilized for controlling a mode of operation of the processing unit 200. The mode of operation may indicate an input and/or output data routing, allowing and/or disallowing key loading by the security processor 102 and/or the host processor 104, and/or selection of a security algorithm, for example. The key memory 204 may comprise suitable logic, circuitry, and/or code that may enable storing decryption and/or encryption keys communicated from the security processor 102 via the at least one secure bus 112 and/or from the host CPU 104 via the control bus 116. In this regard, the key memory 204 may be implemented utilizing a write-only random access memory (RAM), for example.
The secure register 222 and the key memory 224 in the interface block 210 may be the same as or substantially similar to the secure register 202 and the key memory 204 disclosed in
Ownership of the security component of a security system may correspond to a first discrete security control state or first level of initialization and configuration. The owner of a security component may be defined as the user who initializes and configures the secret or secure information in the security processor 102, for example. The owner of the security processor 102 may have the highest level of control of the security system 100. The process of taking ownership may be user specific and may be controlled, at least in part, by procedural safeguards implemented in the production process. In this regard, the production process may comprise storing the appropriate information into the NVM 102a and/or the ROM 102b in the security processor 102.
Enabling or disabling a security component and its features in the security system 100 may correspond to a second discrete security control state or second level of initialization and configuration. In some instances, the security components, such as the plurality of MCs 106, the plurality of IOMs 108, and/or the plurality of PUs 110 disclosed in
A final discrete security control state or level of initialization and configuration may occur after ownership has taken place and the security system 100 is ready for operation. In this regard, during a system boot sequence, the security system 100 may be enabled to transition from a power-off state to one where the security system 100 begins the initialization and configuration level for operation. Entering the system boot sequence may be a result of power being applied to the security system 100 or a hard reset operation, for example. The initialization and configuration for operation may comprise activating or deactivating at least one security component in the security system 100. Such activation or deactivation operations may be performed based on at least one configuration command communicated to the security processor 102 from the host CPU 104, for example.
In step 406, the security processor 102 may provide the second discrete security control state of enabling or disabling security components and/or specified features provided by the security components based on information programmed into the NVM 102b and on security processor ROM code. In this regard, the security processor 102 may program information into secure registers and/or key memory within the security components for enabling and/or disabling the components or specified features. For example, for the processing unit 200 in
In step 408, the security system 100 may utilize a system boot sequence after powering up or after a hard reset during which additional initialization and configuration operations may occur. In step 410, the initialization and configuration for operation of the security system 100 may provide a third discrete security control state by activation or deactivation of enabled security components and/or features provided by the enabled security components. In this regard, the security processor 102 may program information into secure registers and/or key memory within the security components for activating and/or deactivating the components or specified features. For example, for the processing unit 200 in
With eight modes available for security control operation, the security components in the security system 100 may be flexible and may accommodate a wide range of usage scenarios. In this regard, each security component in the security system 100 may be provided with one of the eight security control operational modes. For example, a DES descrambler in an owned security system may be enabled via a control bit in the NVM 102a in the security processor 102 and may be activated or deactivated, also referred to as inactive, via a configuration command provided by the security processor 102 communicated from the host CPU 104.
Utilizing a configuration command may restrict the usage of certain module or security component by programming registers in the security component or by updating checking mechanisms in the security processor 102. In this regard, the host CPU 104 may not utilize the configuration commands to relax existing restrictions because the system architecture may not enable the use of host software for this purpose. The use of a configuration command may also be applicable to other security features such as features provided by security components for interface security, for example. For example, some bits in the NVM 102b may be programmed to enable features and/or security components that support features such as I2C, SPI, JTAG, and/or EJTAG. In this regard, the configuration command may be utilized to set states that restrict these features so that they may be activated after the host CPU 104 passes an authentication test or deactivated for shotdown, for example.
Returning to step 504, based on security requirements for the security system 100, when a bit in the NVM 102a is utilized to disable a DVB descrambler in the security system 100, the process may proceed to step 508. In step 508, the host CPU 104 may not utilize a configuration command sent to the security processor 102 to activate at least a portion of the disabled DVB descrambler. After step 508, the process may proceed to step 510.
Accordingly, the present invention may be realized in hardware, software, or a combination of hardware and software. The present invention may be realized in a centralized fashion in at least one computer system, or in a distributed fashion where different elements are spread across several interconnected computer systems. Any kind of computer system or other apparatus adapted for carrying out the methods described herein is suited. A typical combination of hardware and software may be a general-purpose computer system with a computer program that, when being loaded and executed, controls the computer system such that it carries out the methods described herein.
The present invention may also be embedded in a computer program product, which comprises all the features enabling the implementation of the methods described herein, and which when loaded in a computer system is able to carry out these methods. Computer program in the present context means any expression, in any language, code or notation, of a set of instructions intended to cause a system having an information processing capability to perform a particular function either directly or after either or both of the following: a) conversion to another language, code or notation; b) reproduction in a different material form.
While the present invention has been described with reference to certain embodiments, it will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the scope of the present invention. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation or material to the teachings of the present invention without departing from its scope. Therefore, it is intended that the present invention not be limited to the particular embodiment disclosed, but that the present invention will include all embodiments falling within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is a continuation-in-part of, and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/362,696, which was filed on Feb. 27, 2006. This patent application also makes reference to, claims priority to and claims benefit from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/814,840 filed on Jun. 19, 2006. The above stated application is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5014191 | Padgaonkar et al. | May 1991 | A |
| 5206714 | Kim | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5319705 | Halter et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5530749 | Easter | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5557743 | Pombo et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
| 5623637 | Jones et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5771287 | Gilley et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5832207 | Little et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5933087 | Wright | Aug 1999 | A |
| 6028937 | Tatebayashi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6038563 | Bapat et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6182089 | Ganapathy et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
| 6279063 | Kawasaki et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
| 6317849 | Patel | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6381747 | Wonfor et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6434077 | Holmes | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6466048 | Goodman | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6586968 | Schauer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6686768 | Comer | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6785721 | Immerman et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6850252 | Hoffberg | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 6880005 | Bell et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
| 6880113 | Anderson et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
| 6948183 | Peterka | Sep 2005 | B1 |
| 6950818 | Dennis et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
| 6970462 | McRae | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6992945 | Otsuka | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7147558 | Giobbi | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7167077 | Grassl | Jan 2007 | B2 |
| 7176791 | Sakai et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
| 7227842 | Ji et al. | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7236493 | McRae | Jun 2007 | B1 |
| 7263367 | Sabot | Aug 2007 | B1 |
| 7317723 | Guru | Jan 2008 | B1 |
| 7340469 | Alghathbar et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
| 7350204 | Lambert et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7409707 | Swander et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7444682 | Li et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7445148 | Uchida et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7484237 | Joly et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
| 7487424 | Nam et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7489779 | Scheuermann | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7490333 | Grimaud et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
| 7509673 | Lin et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7518605 | Lin et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7549159 | Shay | Jun 2009 | B2 |
| 7565553 | Hunter et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
| 7590860 | Leporini et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
| 7624424 | Morita et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
| 7647329 | Fischman et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
| 7844996 | Chen et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
| 7913289 | Chen et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
| 8347357 | Chen et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 9177176 | Chen | Nov 2015 | B2 |
| 9489318 | Chen | Nov 2016 | B2 |
| 20020059623 | Rodriguez et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
| 20020099952 | Lambert et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
| 20020138749 | Koguchi et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20020184512 | Cardoso, Jr. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030041267 | Fee et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
| 20030065982 | Grimaud et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030070091 | Loveland | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030081784 | Kallahalla et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030088786 | Moran et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030115417 | Corrigan | Jun 2003 | A1 |
| 20030140245 | Dahan et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
| 20030217322 | Rodgers | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030221030 | Pontius et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
| 20030226029 | Porter et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
| 20040086127 | Candelore | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040170068 | Williams | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040190558 | Delton | Sep 2004 | A1 |
| 20040250131 | Swander et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050010765 | Swander et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050021980 | Kanai | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050022010 | Swander et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
| 20050114616 | Tune et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050144475 | Sakaki et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050213766 | Goss | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050234907 | Yamagishi et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050242924 | Yosim et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262132 | Morita et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262569 | Shay | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050262570 | Shay | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20050268342 | Shay | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20050278483 | Andruszkiewicz et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060004536 | Diamond | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060015947 | Conti et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
| 20060031685 | Chen et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060044861 | Smith et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060075508 | Guo et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060090084 | Buer | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20060145291 | Badami et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060149958 | Omathuna | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060161829 | Kobayashi | Jul 2006 | A1 |
| 20060236408 | Van | Oct 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265733 | Chen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060265734 | Chen et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060272027 | Noble | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20060294575 | Rogers | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070157000 | Qawami et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070169173 | Brown et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
| 20070176756 | Friedrich | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070192839 | Fee et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
| 20070209072 | Chen | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20070290715 | Baer et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20070294497 | Chen | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080005586 | Munguia | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080271164 | Dellow et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
| 20090285280 | Newberry et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
| 20090313461 | Klug | Dec 2009 | A1 |
| 20110197069 | Rodgers et al. | Aug 2011 | A9 |
| 20160055352 | Chen | Feb 2016 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 612 684 | Jan 2006 | EP |
| 1 612 684 | Sep 2009 | EP |
| WO 9725675 | Jul 1997 | WO |
| WO 9914881 | Mar 1999 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Definition of ‘computer code’, from the Free Online Dictionary at http://www.thefreedictionary.com/computer-code, Jul. 1, 2013, 2 pages. |
| EPO Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, dated Mar. 16, 2010, for European Patent Application No. 06021663.7-2212, 3 pages. |
| EPO Communication pursuant to Article 94(3) EPC, dated Jul. 23, 2010, for European Patent Application No. 07000798.4 - 1245, 7 pages. |
| Extended European Search Report, dated Dec. 16, 2008, for European Patent Application No. 06021663.7-2212, 3 pages. |
| Federal Information Processing Standards Publication. Fips Pub 46-3, Data Encryption Standard (DES), Oct. 25, 1999, 25 pages. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070294745 A1 | Dec 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60814840 | Jun 2006 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11362696 | Feb 2006 | US |
| Child | 11682544 | US |