The present disclosure is directed to non-destructive testing methods and systems, and more particularly, to methods and systems for testing of the bond between the components of a honeycomb sandwich structure.
Composite materials, such as fiber-reinforced composite materials, have become popular as a constituent of high-performance products and components that need to be lightweight, yet strong enough to take harsh loading conditions. Examples of such applications are aerospace components, including the tails, wings, fuselages, and propellers of aircraft; boats and other marine vessels; bicycle frames; and car bodies. Modern jet aircraft include fuselages composed largely of composites. Carbon fiber-reinforced polymers (CFRPs) are used in the fuselages of aircraft and space vehicles.
One type of composite material is a lay-up comprised of a honeycomb core sandwiched between two outer skin layers above and below the honeycomb core. The entire sandwich may be made of a material such as fiberglass, a CFRP, aluminum, Nomex (a trademark of E. I. Du Pont De Nemours and Company, Wilmington, Del.), or other materials. Further forms of composites may include foam cores.
The use of such composite materials in high-stress areas of vehicles, such as aircraft, necessitate that the materials in such stress areas be tested periodically to determine whether damage has been sustained, because damage may occur without being visibly apparent on the outer skin of the laminate sandwich. Damage may take the form of disbonding, that is, a separation between the core and the outer skin, and a crushed core. It is desirable to test the composite structure in situ for efficiency reasons, and further, to conduct tests of the material without invasive measures such as scraping or drilling of holes.
Consequently, non-destructive testing systems have been developed. One such system, disclosed in Published U.S. Patent Application Pub. No. 2013/0338941 titled METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DEFECT DETECTION IN COMPOSITE STRUCTURES by Lin et al., the contents of which are incorporated herein by reference, discloses a method and apparatus for defect detection in composite structures. That system and method utilize a “pitch-catch” probe connected to a control box that is controlled by a laptop computer or other computing device. The pitch-catch probe includes two transducers, which may take the form of probe tips spaced approximately one-half inch apart: a first transducer that transmits a sound signal, which may be sonic or ultrasonic, to and through the surface of the composite material to be tested, and a second transducer that receives the sound or sound signal that has traveled through the part. Changes in the structure of the part (such as defects) change how the sound travels through the part and can be detected by examining the amplitude, phase, and frequency of the received waveform. The alteration of the frequency, phase, and amplitude of the sound signal is processed by the control box to determine the presence of a defect. Variations in the received sound signal may be matched with a library of known signals for that particular composite material being tested, so that the received signal can be used to determine a type of defect in the composite material.
Traditionally, pitch-catch probes have been driven at a single frequency. However, it is known that different flaws are detected better when using different sound frequencies, but different flaw configurations have different natural resonant frequencies. Multiple discrete probe drive frequencies or a continuously swept sine wave probe drive are used to generate sound at multiple frequencies to increase the probability of finding any flaw in the part. A swept frequency probe drive transmits a plurality of sound waves at different frequencies. Common frequencies are between 10 kHz and 30 kHz, but other frequencies are also used. The probe drive frequency can be swept up or down.
Since the piezoelectric crystals in the pitch-catch probe generate and detect sound with different efficiency at different frequencies, a problem with swept frequency probes is that the appropriate instrument gain setting changes with frequency. When the gain is set to keep the high frequency signals on the screen of an associated display, the low frequency signals can no longer be seen, and appear as an almost flat trace (see
The disclosure is directed to a method and system for non-destructive testing of composites that overcomes the disadvantages of systems that apply a single gain setting across a swept frequency and as a result may fail to produce easy to identify defect indications at one or more frequencies of the swept frequency probe. In one embodiment, a system for non-destructive testing of a composite includes a emitter that transmits sound signals to a test area of the composite, receives sound signals from the test area in response to the transmitted sound signals, and generates electric signals in response to the received signals; a computer control in communication with the emitter to receive the electric signals from the emitter, wherein the computer control is programmed to cause the emitter to transmit a plurality of the sound signals to the test area at a plurality of different frequencies over a range of frequencies; a display for displaying a graph of the received sound signals showing a received signal amplitude for the plurality of different frequencies of the range of frequencies; and the computer control programmed to apply a different, preset gain setting to at least one of the plurality of frequencies for a selected display image such that the display image shows a plot of received signal amplitude for the plurality of frequencies that is at least partially flattened, so that the amplitude of the signal from material without defects is the same at all frequencies, and changes in the amplitude of the signal are visually perceptible on the display for all of the plurality of signals.
In another embodiment, a method for making a non-destructive testing system includes connecting a emitter that transmits sound signals to a test area of the composite, receives sound signals from the test area in response to the transmitted sound signals, and generates electric signals in response to the received signals, to a computer control, such that the computer control receives electric signals from the emitter; connecting the computer control to a display; and programming the computer control to cause the emitter to transmit a plurality of the sound signals to the test area at a plurality of different frequencies over a range of frequencies, display on the display a graph of the received sound signals showing a received signal amplitude for the plurality of different frequencies of the range of frequencies, and apply a different, preset gain setting to at least one of the plurality of frequencies for a selected display image on the display, such that the display image shows a plot of received signal amplitude for the plurality of frequencies that is at least partially flattened, so that the amplitude of the signal from material without defects is the same at all frequencies, and changes in the amplitude of the signal are visually perceptible on the display for all of the plurality of signals.
In yet another embodiment, a method of non-destructive testing of a composite includes transmitting sound signals from a emitter to a test area of the composite, receiving sound signals by the emitter from the test area in response to the transmitted sound signals; generating electric signals by the emitter in response to the received signals; receiving the electric signals from the emitter by a computer control, wherein the computer control is programmed to cause the emitter to transmit a plurality of the sound signals to the test area at a plurality of different frequencies over a range of frequencies; displaying on a display graph of the received sound signals showing a received signal amplitude for the plurality of different frequencies of the range of frequencies; and applying by the computer control a different, pre-set gain setting to at least one of the plurality of frequencies for a selected display image such that the display image shows a plot of received signal amplitude for the plurality of frequencies that is at least partially flattened, so that the amplitude of the signal from material without defects is the same at all frequencies, and changes in the amplitude of the signal are visually perceptible on the display for all of the plurality of signals.
Other objects and advantages of the disclosed method and system for non-destructive testing of composites will be apparent from the following description, the accompanying drawings, and the appended claims.
An embodiment of the disclosed system for non-destructive testing of composites, generally designated 10, is shown in
In an embodiment, the computer control 18 may include an electronics chassis 24 that is connected by a cable 26 to a laptop computer 28. As will be explained in greater detail, the computer control 18 may be programmed to apply a different, preset gain setting to at least one of the plurality of frequencies for selected display image 30 (
In an embodiment, the system 10 may include an automated system, such as the AUSS Mobile automated system manufactured by The Boeing Company of St. Louis, Mo. The emitter 12 may be a pitch-catch emitter and may be mounted on an X-Y scanning frame, generally designated 34. The X-Y scanning frame may include a longitudinal rail 36 that supports a sliding collar 38 connected to a transverse rail 40 that is supported at an opposite end by a wheel assembly 42. The emitter 12 may be mounted on a sliding collar 44 that slides along the transverse rail 40. The longitudinal rail 36 may be attached to the composite material 16 by fixed attachments, such as suction cups 46. The position of the collar 44 may be transmitted by a cable 48 to the electronics chassis 24 of the computer control 18. Alternatively, the emitter 12 may be attached to a small hand-held scanner, robot arm, robotic crawler, or other type of scanner.
The composite material 16 may have a honeycomb core 50 sandwiched between outer skins 52, 54 of composite material, such as CFRP, fiberglass, and the like. Alternatively, the honeycomb core 50 may be sandwiched between outer skins 52, 54 of aluminum. Alternatively, the sandwich structure may use foam or wood as a material for the core 50, instead of honeycomb.
As shown in
These gain settings 68-76 comprise different, pre-set gain settings that are applied to the frequencies received from the emitter 12 and displayed on display 22 to form the plot 32 (
In this embodiment, the computer control 18 may be programmed to apply a relatively larger gain setting to at least one frequency in a first group 77 of the plurality of frequencies, and a relatively smaller gain setting to at least one frequency in a second group 79 of the plurality of frequencies. As shown in
In the particular embodiment depicted in
As shown in
As shown in
Also in an embodiment, by flattening the plot 32, 32′, the display 30 may include a line 82 at a predetermined amplitude that may serve as an alarm threshold for identifying flaws, or as a gate for mapping flaws in a C-scan collected by an automated system. Such an automated system may require the computer control 18 to be programmed to recognize absolute amplitudes that exceed the line 82, note the location on the test area 14 and type of defect, and store the data in storage associated with, or in communication with, the computer control.
As shown in
As shown in block 98, the computer control 18 may be programmed to display on the display 22 the image 30 of the plot 32 of the received sound signals 15 showing a received signal amplitude for the plurality of different frequencies of the range of frequencies. As shown in block 100, the computer control 18 may be programmed to apply a different, pre-set gain setting to at least one of the plurality of frequencies 68-76 for a selected display image 30 on the display 22 such that the display image shows a graph or plot 32 of received signal amplitude for the plurality of frequencies that is at least partially flattened to make the selected display image show more pronounced, visually perceptible, flaw signals.
In an embodiment, as shown in block 102, the computer control 18 optionally may be programmed to apply the different pre-sent gain setting in real time, as the image 30 of the plot 32 is displayed on the display 22. And as shown in block 104, the computer control 18 optionally may be programmed to apply a first gain setting 68 to at least one frequency in the first group 77 of the plurality of frequencies, and a second gain setting, less than the first gain setting, to at least one frequency 76 in the second group 79 of the plurality of frequencies 68-76.
As shown in block 106 and in
As shown in
The probe or emitter 12 may be driven with a sinusoidal wave of continuously varying frequency, or it may be driven at multiple discrete frequencies. With the multiple discrete frequency approach, the computer control 18 may be programmed to drive the probe or emitter 12 at one selected frequency for a time interval, then switch to the next frequency in the range 77, 79 for a second, subsequent time interval, and so on in successive time intervals for all of the selected frequencies 68-76. The rate at which the probe or emitter 12 switches through the selected frequencies 68-76 may be very rapid compared to (i.e., is greater than) the speed at which the emitter 12 moves over the test area 14 of the composite 16.
As shown in block 210, the computer control 18 may be programmed to cause the emitter 12 to transmit a plurality of the sound signals to the test area 14 at a plurality of different frequencies over a range of frequencies. As shown in block 212, the method 204 may include displaying on a graph 30 that may include a plot 32 of the received sound signals 15 showing a received signal amplitude for the plurality of different frequencies 68-76 of the range of frequencies. The computer control 18 may be programmed to apply a different, pre-set gain setting to at least one of the plurality of different frequencies 68-76 for a selected display image 30 on the display 22, such that the display image 30 shows a plot 32 of received signal amplitude for the plurality of different frequencies 68-76 that is at least partially flattened.
The amplitude of the signal 15 from material 16 without defects is the same at all frequencies, as shown in
As illustrated in the accompanying drawings and discussed herein, the disclosed system 10 and methods 90, 204 solve the problem of keeping high frequency signals on a display screen 22 across a swept frequency display 30 by applying a different gain setting to different frequencies as they are displayed. By applying different gain settings, in one embodiment such that the amount of gain setting varies inversely with the frequency, the plot 32, 32′ shown on the display 22 is flattened and allows flaws to be detected at any frequency across the swept frequency range of the probe or emitter 12.
While the forms of apparatus and methods described herein constitute preferred embodiments of the disclosed method and system for non-destructive testing of composites, it is to be understood that the disclosure is not limited to these specific embodiments, and that changes may be made therein without departing from the scope of the disclosure.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4462082 | Thiele et al. | Jul 1984 | A |
4545251 | Uchida et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
5146289 | Newman | Sep 1992 | A |
6751342 | Shepard | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7075084 | Thompson et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7119338 | Thompson et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7186981 | Shepard et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7220966 | Saito et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7246522 | Diaz | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7287902 | Safai et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7312454 | Safai et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7553070 | Kollgaard et al. | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7699521 | Shepard | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7724925 | Shepard | May 2010 | B2 |
7819008 | Winter et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
8167482 | Hatcher | May 2012 | B2 |
8204294 | Aloo et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8289372 | Hamrelius et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8338787 | Shelley, Jr. et al. | Dec 2012 | B1 |
8449176 | Shepard | May 2013 | B2 |
8498836 | Carlson | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8499632 | Ihn et al. | Aug 2013 | B1 |
8834376 | Stergiopoulos et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8853634 | Shelley, Jr. et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
8981771 | Thompson | Mar 2015 | B2 |
20040011132 | Netzel | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050268720 | Quarry | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060043303 | Safai et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20070056374 | Andrews | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070084290 | Fetzer et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070148999 | Haider et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20120219034 | Nielson | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20130338941 | Lin | Dec 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2010103098 | Sep 2010 | WO |
Entry |
---|
PCT, “International Search Report and Written Opinion”, Patent Application No. PCT/SG2011/000196, 14 pages (dated Aug. 8, 2011). |
PCT, “International Preliminary Report on Patentability”, Patent Application No. PCT/SG2011/000196, 10 pages (dated Jul. 2, 2013). |
US, “System and Method for Automated Bond Testing”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/985,646, 22 pages, (filed Dec. 31, 2015). |
US, “Detecting and Displaying Flaws in a Device Under Test”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/002,162, 29 pages, (filed Jan. 20, 2016). |
US, “Detecting Inclusions and Disbonds in Green Material Repairs With Thermography”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/961,494, 40 pages, (filed Dec. 7, 2015). |
US, “Infrared Thermographic Methods for Wrinkle Characterization in Composite Structures”, U.S. Appl. No. 15/004,119, 47 pages, (filed Jan. 22, 2016). |
US, “Infrared Thermographic Porosity Quantification in Composite Structures”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/961,419, 16 pages, (filed Dec. 7, 2015). |
US, “System and Method for High Speed FOD Detection”, U.S. Appl. No. 14/614,198, 28 pages, (filed Feb. 4, 2015). |
U.S. Non-Final Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/977,319 (dated Feb. 5, 2016). |
Roach, Dennis, “Assessing conventional and advanced NDI for composite aircraft”; High-Performance Composites, pp. 1-5 (Jun. 30, 2008). |
Zurn et al., “Pitch catch ultrasonic bond sensor for the in-situ tow placement consolidation of thermoplastic laminates”, Proc. SPIE 3589, Process Control and Sensors for Manufacturing II, 149, pp. 1-7 (Feb. 4, 1999). |
“Maus V Automated System”, NDT Solutions, Inc., http://www.ndts.com/products/maus/maus-v/, pp. 1-3 (Internet Archive Wayback Machine first use date Nov. 30, 2012). |
EPOCH 650 Ultrasonic Flaw Detector Getting Started Guide; Olympus Scientific Solutions Americas Corp., www.olympus-ims.com; 12 pages (Feb. 2015). |
EPOCH 650 Versatile and Rugged Flaw Detector; Olympus Scientific Solutions Americas Corp., www.olympus-ims.com; 8 pages (2015). |
Conventional UT and Phased Array Flaw Detector—OmniScan MXU-M-Manual Inspection Solution; Olympus NDT Inc., www.olympus-ims.com; 4 pages (2010). |
OmniScan MX with ECA/ECT Modules—Discover Eddy Current Color Imaging; Olympus NDT Inc., www.olympus-ims.com; 12 pages (2013). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20170248549 A1 | Aug 2017 | US |