The present invention relates to methods and systems for monitoring components of a library. More particularly, the present invention relates to methods and systems for monitoring library components by tracking library components in a non-intrusive manner using an out-of-band appliance.
Data represents a significant asset for many entities. Consequently, data loss, whether accidental or caused by malicious activity, can be costly in terms of wasted manpower, loss of goodwill from customers, loss of time and potential legal liability. To ensure proper protection of data for business and legal purposes, many entities back up data to a physical storage media such as magnetic tapes or optical disks. Traditionally, backup would occur at each machine controlled by an entity. As the sophistication of network technology increased, many entities turned to enterprise level backup in which data from multiple machines on a network is backed up to a remote library. Typically, a library includes a variety of components which include a plurality of media for data storage, e.g. multiple magnetic tapes. Centralized data backup has the advantage of increased volume, efficiency and redundancy.
In many systems, the data to be backed up and backup commands are sent over a network from multiple machines on the network to a library. In many instances, the data to be backed up and the backup commands are routed to the library through a switch.
One example of a library commonly used in enterprise backup systems is a magnetic tape library. A magnetic tape library can comprise components such as tape cartridges (containing magnetic tape), robots, tape slots and tape drives. A typical magnetic tape library contains multiple cartridge slots in which tape cartridges can be stored. Tape cartridges, commonly referred to as tapes, are physically moved between cartridge slots and tape drives by a robot. The robot is controlled by commands received from the host devices on the network. When specific data is required, a host device determines which cartridge slot contains the tape cartridge that holds the desired data. The host device then transmits a move-element command to the robot and the robot moves the tape cartridge to a tape drive which reads the desired data from the tape cartridge.
In a SCSI tape library, devices that are part of the library are typically addressed by target number. Thus, each drive and robot of a tape library typically has a target number. Cartridge slots, on the other hand, are addressed by element numbers that are used by the robot to locate the slots. Because the robot also places tape cartridges in the drives, each drive is also associated with an element number.
Components of a library are subject to wear and other forms of degradation which may degrade individual library component(s) to a point where the degraded component(s) can no longer be reliably used. Degradation of library components may render a library unreliable and prone to data loss, diminishing the library's usefulness as a backup device. The failing of even one library component can cause the loss of valuable data. Furthermore, the process of determining which library component is failing and rendering the library unreliable can be time consuming, uncertain and expensive.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a method and system of monitoring library components that eliminates, or at least substantially reduces, the shortcomings of prior art library systems and methods. More particularly, embodiments of the present invention comprise polling the state of a library at intervals and monitoring library components based on a set of returned library states from the polling of the library. The method can also comprise comparing returned library states to track the movement of one or more library component(s). The method can further comprise correlating errors with a particular library component based on the movement of one or more library component(s). Thus tape movements can be tracked and library components monitored.
Another embodiment of the present invention can include a set of computer instructions executable by a computer processor to poll the state of a library at intervals and monitor library components based on a set of returned library states from the polling of the library. The computer instructions can also be executable to compare returned library states to track the movement of one or more library component(s). The computer instructions can be further executable to correlate errors with a particular library component based on the movement of one or more library component(s). In this manner, the computer instructions can be executable to track tape movements and monitor library components.
The present invention provides an advantage over prior art systems and methods of monitoring libraries by providing a non-intrusive method of monitoring library components: the state of a library can be monitored without having to intercept commands and data being sent to or from the library. An additional advantage is that the monitoring appliance does not have to be in-band, but can be an out-of-band device. This allows the monitoring appliance to be a self-contained device which can be coupled to a switch or network, allowing for easy deployment. This can reduce the complexity and cost of monitoring library components.
A more complete understanding of the present invention and the advantages thereof may be acquired by referring to the following description, taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which like reference numbers indicate like features and wherein:
Preferred embodiments of the invention are illustrated in the FIGURES, like numerals being used to refer to like and corresponding parts of the various drawings.
Embodiments of the present invention provide a method and system for monitoring the components of a library. By monitoring library components, the degradation and reliability of library components can be monitored, allowing unreliable or unacceptably degraded components to be identified, thus allowing for the unreliable or degraded components to be bypassed or replaced, enhancing the reliability of the library and proactively preventing data loss.
A Read Element Status (RES) command is a command which is used to poll the state of a library. That is, a RES command is sent to a library and in response, the library returns its current state, including the locations of individual tape cartridges. Thus a RES command provides a snapshot of a library at any one time. Examples of a RES command can be found in section 6.5 of NCITS T10/999D Revision 10a Specification, section 6.10 of INCITS T10/1383D Revision 7 Specification and section 6.10 of INCITS T10/1730-D Revision 5 Specification; all of the above-mentioned Specifications are hereby incorporated by reference.
A drive inquiry is an inquiry command that is used to query the serial number of components of a library such as a tape drive or other drive or a media changer. Embodiments of drive inquiry commands query single library components. That is, an individual drive inquiry may regard one library component.
Embodiments of the invention utilize a monitoring appliance which can be a Read Verify Appliance (RVA). The monitoring appliance polls the state of a library over time by sending RES commands to the library at intervals. Returned library states are compared. Based on the comparison between the returned library states, the movement of tape cartridges over time can be tracked.
In further embodiments of the invention, a library state is represented as a XML representation of data returned in response to a RES command. A XML representation can be supplemented with data returned in response to one or more drive inquires. For example, a supplemented XML representation of a library state can include serial numbers of library components determined from drive inquiries issued to corresponding library components. In other embodiments of the invention, a library state can be represented in a different format.
Tracking the movement of tape cartridges or other media allows sources of errors to be identified. For example, an individual tape cartridge may suffer from an increasing number of data errors in any drive: this implies that the tape cartridge is degrading and may require replacement. In another example, a tape cartridge may encounter errors when used with a tape drive A but may encounter no errors when used with other tape drives. If other tape cartridges encounter errors when used with tape drive A, but encounter no errors when used with other tape drives, this implies that tape drive A is unreliable. Accordingly, tape drive A may be bypassed or replaced. By tracking the movement of one or more tape cartridges, errors can be correlated to a particular tape or drive.
It should be noted that the intervals between polling can be fixed periods of time or of variable duration or a combination of the two. In one embodiment, the monitoring appliance polls a library every 30 seconds. In another embodiment, the time duration between polling is less than the backup time or the tape movement time. In embodiments of the invention, the intervals can be determined by computer algorithm or user input.
Switch 207 is connected to library 100. Thus switch 207 can forward RES commands from monitoring appliance 220 to library 100. Switch 207 receives the library state generated in response to the RES command from library 100 and forwards the library state to monitoring appliance 220 which stores the library state and/or compares it with one or more previous library states. Thus monitoring appliance 220 can continually poll the state of library 100, track tape movements and monitor the components of library 100. Because monitoring appliance 220 tracks tape movements using RES commands, monitoring appliance 220 does not need to intercept commands or responses from network 205 to track tape movements. Thus, in one embodiment, monitoring appliance 220 can be an out-of-band appliance. This allows monitoring appliance 220 to be a non-intrusive device which does not monitor or interfere with commands from and responses to hosts 202a-202d. Consequently, monitoring appliance 220 can be a compartmentalized device which can be coupled to a switch and which does not have to be integrated into network 205. An advantage of this out-of-band methodology is that a monitoring appliance can be used to monitor library components without cumbersome configuring.
While shown as a physical media library in
Secondary memory 304 can store a variety of computer instructions that include, for example, an operating system such as a Windows operating system (Windows is a trademark of Redmond, Wash. based Microsoft Corporation) and applications that run on the operating system, along with a variety of data. More particularly, secondary memory 304 can store a software program 330 that monitors library components. During execution by processor 302, portions of program 330 can be stored in secondary memory 304 and/or primary memory 303.
In embodiments of the invention, library states are supplemented with additional data. Such data can be obtained from, for example, one or more drive inquires and can include the serial number of one or more components.
Either tape movements can be stored and used to monitor library components or the actual library states can be stored and used to track tape movements. It is possible to store both tape movements or library states or any combination of the two. Tape movements or library states can be stored in memory, in a database or according to other data storage schemes to allow for easy access.
Embodiments of the present invention can also be implemented with respect to libraries of media other than magnetic tapes. For example, the library can comprise a plurality of optical disks (i.e., an optical jukebox) or removable hard drives. Other libraries can utilize a combination of different storage media such as hard drives, magnetic media or optical media.
While the present invention has been described with reference to particular embodiments, it should be understood that the embodiments are illustrative and that the scope of the invention is not limited to these embodiments. Many variations, modifications, additions and improvements to the embodiments described above are possible. It is contemplated that these variations, modifications, additions and improvements fall within the scope of the invention as detailed in the following claims.
This application is a continuation of, and claims a benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 120 of the filing date of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/801,809, filed on May 11, 2007, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR NON-INTRUSIVE MONITORING OF LIBRARY COMPONENTS”, the entire contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference for all purposes.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3704363 | Salmassy et al. | Nov 1972 | A |
3984923 | Rawson et al. | Oct 1976 | A |
4754345 | Karlstetter | Jun 1988 | A |
4932826 | Moy et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4958235 | Sims et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
5253126 | Richmond | Oct 1993 | A |
5309768 | Mathews et al. | May 1994 | A |
5386324 | Fry et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5668800 | Stevenson | Sep 1997 | A |
5781703 | Desai et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5822516 | Krech, Jr. | Oct 1998 | A |
5881221 | Hoang et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5883864 | Saliba | Mar 1999 | A |
6052264 | Curtis | Apr 2000 | A |
6052341 | Bingham et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6163853 | Findlay et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6269330 | Cidon et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6304880 | Kishi | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6490253 | Miller et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6624958 | Alva | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6715031 | Camble et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6725394 | Bolt | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6799156 | Rieschl et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6823401 | Feather, Jr. et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6839824 | Camble et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6950871 | Honma et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
6971046 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7076391 | Pakzad et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7200546 | Nourmohamadian et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7200722 | Goodman | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7310745 | Schnapp et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7386667 | Estelle et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7443801 | Neidhardt et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7444469 | Estelle et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7483810 | Jackson et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7492720 | Pruthi et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7573664 | Bentley et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7583604 | Couturier | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7596096 | Crawford et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7627786 | Bello et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7653840 | Taylor et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7809990 | Sasaki | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7885805 | Dickens et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
7908366 | Sims | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7971006 | Justiss et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7974215 | Sims | Jul 2011 | B1 |
8035911 | Ballard et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8108544 | Ramakrishnan et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8117501 | Taniyama et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
8145572 | Ito | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8180824 | McCoy et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8195986 | Meaney et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8495432 | Dickens et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8631127 | Sims | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8631281 | Stripling et al. | Jan 2014 | B1 |
8639807 | Sims | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8644185 | Sims | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8645328 | Sims | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8650241 | Moody, II et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8832495 | Foster et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8843787 | Foster et al. | Sep 2014 | B1 |
20010039579 | Trcka et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010040748 | Nagai et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020006004 | Miyamura | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020055999 | Takeda | May 2002 | A1 |
20030070053 | Gallo et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030097439 | Strayer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030126395 | Camble et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030128448 | Gunderson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030225865 | Koestler | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030233431 | Reddy et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040022263 | Zhao et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040078697 | Duncan | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040139195 | Feather, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040139240 | DiCorpo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040168102 | Tsunoda | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050044451 | Fry et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050052772 | Barbian et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050076263 | Tomita | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050091369 | Jones | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050138195 | Bono | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050149829 | Lee | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050174869 | Kottomtharayil et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050210161 | Guignard et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050231846 | Winarski et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050246376 | Lu et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050246509 | Topham et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050262231 | Lowe et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20060085595 | Slater | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060092850 | Neidhardt et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060126211 | Sasaki | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060170238 | Justiss et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060174071 | Justiss et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060190205 | Klein et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060242489 | Brockway et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070025008 | Ballard | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070067678 | Hosek et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079048 | Starr et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070106840 | Estelle | May 2007 | A1 |
20070226336 | Katagiri et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070253088 | Clarke et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070255920 | Gold | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070294591 | Usynin et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080019283 | Emile | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080098168 | Estelle | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080109547 | Bao et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080115015 | Ikezawa et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080259809 | Stephan et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080282265 | Foster et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20090044047 | Bates et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090059757 | Haustein et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090106816 | Ito | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090113129 | Deicke et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090199045 | Kasubuchi et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100023604 | Verma et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100033863 | Fry et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100125740 | Grechanik | May 2010 | A1 |
20100228805 | McCoy et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20140085744 | Stripling et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140095815 | Sims | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140112118 | Moody, II et al. | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140112185 | Sims | Apr 2014 | A1 |
20140122438 | Sims | May 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0726570 | Aug 1996 | EP |
2419198 | Apr 2006 | GB |
Entry |
---|
Weber, Ralph O. (ed.) Information Technology—SCSI Primary Commands—4 (SPC-4), Project T10/1731-D, Working Draft, rev. 2, Sep. 15, 2005, ENDL Texas, Dallas, TX, 499 pgs. |
Penokie, George (ed.) Information Technology—SCSI Block Commands—3 (SBC-3), T10/1799-D, Working Draft, Rev. 6, Jul. 24, 2006, IBM Corp., Rochester, MN, 169 pgs. |
Weber, Ralph O. (ed.) Information Technology—SCSI Primary Commands—4 (SPC-4), Project T10/1731-D, Working Draft, rev. 10, Apr. 21, 2007, ENDL Texas, Dallas, TX, 551 pgs. |
Weber, Ralph O.(ed.) Information Technology—SCSI Primary Commands—3 (SPC-3), Project T10/1416-D, Working Draft, rev. 22a, Mar. 25, 2005, ENDL Texas, Dallas, TX, 496 pgs. |
Oetting, Erich (ed.) Information Technology—SCSI Media Changer Commands—2 (SMC-2), INCITS T10 Project 1383D, Working Draft, rev. 7, Nov. 18, 2003, Storage Tech Corp., Louisville, CO, 68 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Aug. 29, 2008 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2008/63227, 7 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion mailed Jun. 29, 2009 for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/032402, 11 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion completed Jun. 26, 2009, mailed Jul. 3, 2009, for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2009/032390, 13 pgs. |
Boehler, Paul, “Common SCSI/ATAPI Command Set for Streaming Tape” QIC 157, Revision D, Quarter-Inch Cartridge Drive Standards, Santa Barbara, CA, Dec. 13, 1995, 50 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,322, mailed Dec. 30, 2009, 11 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,436, mailed Mar. 30, 2010, 15 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/024,755, mailed Jun. 23, 2010, 11 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,322, mailed Jul. 8, 2010, 15 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Ch. I) for International Application No. PCT/US2009/032402, issued on Aug. 3, 2010, 8 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Ch. I) for International Application No. PCT/US2009/032390 issued on Aug. 10, 2010, 8 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,436, mailed Sep. 15, 2010, 21 pgs. |
“SCSI DDS Tape Expert Tool (mstm Online Help),” Hewlett Packard, Updated Apr. 29, 2002, printed on Aug. 30, 2010, 8 pgs., at http://docs.hp.com/hpux/onlinedocs/diag/stm/help/expert/scsi—ddsm.htm. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,809, mailed Sep. 23, 2010, 31 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,809, mailed Feb. 16, 2011, 23 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,436, mailed Mar. 11, 2011, 25 pgs. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/021517, mailed Apr. 19, 2011, 12 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,809, mailed Jun. 7, 2011, 16 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,436, mailed Aug. 22, 2011, 36 pgs. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Ch. II) for International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/63227, mailed Oct. 31, 2011, Patent Cooperation Treaty, 25 pgs. |
Corrected International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Ch. II) for International Patent Application No. PCT/US08/63227, mailed Feb. 2, 2012, Patent Cooperation Treaty, 22 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/459,720, mailed Aug. 1, 2012, 16 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/430,429, mailed Aug. 2, 2012, 15 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,300, mailed Aug. 6, 2012, 30 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,609, mailed Aug. 7, 2012, 10 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/091,877, mailed Oct. 11, 2012, 14 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,436, mailed Nov. 9, 2012, 34 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,612, mailed Nov. 27, 2012, 12 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/888,954, mailed Dec. 13, 2012, 14 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,609, mailed Jan. 4, 2013, 12 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,300, mailed Feb. 15, 2013, 35 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/692,403, mailed Feb. 20, 2013, 35 pgs. |
IBM et al., Hardware and Volume Statistical Analysis and Reporting System for Detecting and Isolating Media and Hardware Errors on the Magstar Family of Tape Drives, Dec. 1, 1999, 4 pgs (IP.com No. IPCOM000013086D). |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability (Ch. I) for International Patent Application No. PCT/US2011/021517, mailed Aug. 2, 2012, 8 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,809, mailed Mar. 27, 2013, 13 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,612, mailed Jun. 11, 2013, 12 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,809, mailed Jun. 20, 2013, 4 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,300, mailed Jul. 30, 2013, 29 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,809, mailed Aug. 22, 2013, 5 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/888,954, mailed Aug. 23, 2013, 16 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,609, mailed Sep. 6, 2013, 11 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,809, mailed Dec. 17, 2013, 8 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,300, mailed Jan. 2, 2014, 33 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/861,609, mailed Feb. 5, 2014, 3 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,809, mailed Mar. 25, 2014, 4 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,300, mailed Apr. 23, 2014, 29 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/143,046, mailed May 7, 2014, 18 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,591, mailed Jun. 2, 2014, 13 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 11/801,809, mailed Jun. 27, 2014, 4 pgs. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 12/025,300, mailed Sep. 24, 2014, 10 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/099,591, mailed Oct. 1, 2014, 5 pgs. |
Office Action for U.S. Appl. No. 14/464,034, mailed Nov. 5, 2014, 8 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140325284 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11801809 | May 2007 | US |
Child | 14324980 | US |