The present invention relates to the field of wireless communications. More specifically, the present invention relates to the optimization of power resources of wireless devices within wireless communications systems.
Portable electronic devices frequently run off of batteries. Data delivered to the devices is often short (e.g. email, instant messaging, numerical updates, status changes). The power dissipated by the devices while looking for transmissions that may be directed to them can often exceed the power required to receive such transmissions. Moreover, the devices typically only occasionally have transmissions directed to them. Despite the fact that most devices only occasionally have transmissions directed to them, the devices must nevertheless stay awake for the entire notification period. This means that many devices are dissipating power during the entire notification period, even though usually there is no data for them.
It would therefore be desirable for devices to be able to quickly determine if data is being sent to them, and if not return to a sleep mode so as to conserve energy.
The present invention is a method and system for optimizing power resources in wireless devices. The invention utilizes message lists adapted to allow devices to quickly determine whether the list contains a message for them thereby decreasing the amount of time devices must be awake while searching for messages.
The preferred embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to the drawing figures wherein like numerals represent like elements throughout.
Referring initially to
To decrease the time which devices must remain awake while determining whether particular message listings include a message for them, the present invention arranges message listings as shown in
Referring initially to
In an alternate embodiment, as shown in
A logic diagram showing a method 30 for determining whether a message has arrived for a wireless device is shown in
The method 30 begins with step 32 by initializing a search pointer of the device to a first identifier and loading the count of identifiers listed into a count variable (i.e. a register or memory unit that contains the count). The method 30 then proceeds to step 34 to determine whether the count is equal to zero. If the count is equal to zero, the method 30 proceeds to step 36 wherein the message flag is cleared. If the count is not equal to zero, the method proceeds to step 38. In step 38, the destination identifier pointed to by the pointer search is loaded by the device. The device preferably loads the destination identifier into a processing element of the device. Once the destination identifier is loaded by the device, the method 30 proceeds to step 40 wherein the destination identifier is compared with the device identifier to determine whether the destination identifier is greater than the device identifier. If yes, there are no subsequent messages for the device and the method 30 proceeds to step 36 where, as mentioned, the message flag is cleared. If no, the method 30 proceeds to step 42 wherein it is determined whether the destination identifier is equal to the device identifier. If the destination identifier is equal to the device identifier, there is a message for the device and the method 30 proceeds to step 44. In step 44, the message flag is set and a pointer to the message corresponding to the destination identifier is loaded. If the destination identifier is not equal to the device identifier, the method 30 proceeds from step 42 to step 46. In step 46, the search pointer is advanced to the next destination identifier and in step 48 the count is decreased.
Referring now to
In step 62, if the destination identifier is equal to the device identifier, a message flag is set and the pointer to the message corresponding to the destination identifier is added to the message list for the particular wireless device performing method 50 (step 64). From step 64, the method proceeds to step 66 wherein the search pointer is advanced to the next destination identifier. If, in step 62, the destination identifier is not equal to the device identifier, the method 50 proceeds directly from step 62 to step 66. After step 66, the count of identifiers listed is decremented. The amount the count is decremented may be determined as desired.
Referring now to
The method 70 begins with step 72 wherein a search pointer to the first device identifier is initialized, the count of identifiers listed is loaded into the count variable, the flag and list messages are cleared, and a first test identifier from a test message list is loaded into a processing element of a wireless device. The test message list contains all of the identifiers that the device could potentially be receiving a message from during the time window is awakened to examine. The test list should be in a monotonic order suitable for searching the received identifiers. From step 72, the method 70 proceeds to step 74 where it is determined whether the count of identifiers listed is equal to zero. If yes, the method 70 ends at step 76. If no, the method 70 proceeds to step 78 wherein the destination identifier pointed to by the search pointer is loaded into a processing element of the device. Moving to step 80, it is determined whether the destination identifier is greater than the test identifier. If yes, the method proceeds to step 82 where it is determined whether there is another test identifier in the test list. If there is another test identifier in the list, the next test identifier is loaded in step 84 and the method returns to step 74. If there is not another test identifier, the method 70 ends at step 86.
Returning to step 80, if the destination identifier is not greater than the test identifier, the method 70 proceeds to step 88. In step 88, it is determined whether the destination identifier is equal to the test identifier. If yes, a message flag is set and a pointer to the message corresponding to the destination identifier is added to the message list (step 90). From step 90, the method 70 proceeds to step 92. If, in contrast, the destination identifier is not equal to the test identifier, the method 70 proceeds directly to step 92. In step 92, the search pointer is advanced to the next destination identifier and in step 94 the count of identifiers listed is decremented. The amount the count is decremented may be determined as desired.
Referring now to
A method whereby devices may determine whether a message listing as shown in
In step 132, it is determined whether the destination identifier is equal to the device identifier. If so, the message flag is set and the pointer to the message that corresponds to the destination identifier is loaded into a processing element of the device (step 134). If not, the search pointer is advanced to the next destination identifier in step 136 and the method 120 continues at step 124.
Which of the preceding forms is used, or some variation of those presented, is based on efficiency tradeoffs associated with the numerical values allowed for the identifiers and message pointers, and the processing devices searching for messages. The pointer to the message can be a simple programming language pointer to the information defining the existence of the actual message transmission, or it may be the information itself. The actual information may be of the form: carrier channel, time slot, and channelization code. If the message information is very short (e.g. telephone number), it will often be more efficient to insert in the message in the usual position for the message pointer. In this case one or more bits of the message pointer part of the stream will need to be reserved as definition bits for the other bits present. Two bits, for instance, could be encoded such that one encoding indicates the rest of the bits is the message, another encoding that the pointer to the message follows, and a third encoding that the pointer to the data defining where to find the message follows. The fourth encoding possibility is a spare for some future use.
With respect to implementation of the present invention in 3G Radio Access Networks, there are two basic methods for identifying “destinations” and “message pointers.” broadcast (BCCH over BCH/P-CCPCH) or dedicated (DCCH over DCH/DPCCH+DPDCH) signaling. If dedicated signaling is applied, the signaling is specific for the “destination,” and there is no application or benefit in ordering the control information since all of it is for the destination device. If broadcast signaling is applied, the existing mechanism that retrieves this data is independent of the processing of the data.
When the number of messages is small, the above-described embodiments are usually the fastest means for locating or determining there is not a message for the device. However, if the list is long, there are faster methods which may be implemented to search a monotonically increasing or decreasing message list. For example, binary search protocols on average require log2 (Count) tests. The calculations are more involved, and different processors will be able to perform them with varying speeds. Typically if there are more than approximately 32 received identifiers, binary searching will be faster for a single identifier being tested. If there are multiple identifiers being tested, sequential testing is more efficient for a larger count. The choice of protocol may also be chosen based on the values of the identifier or identifiers being tested. If a single number is being searched for is low and the receive sequence (i.e. message listing) monotonically increasing, the best approach is to begin the search at the beginning of the received data. If the signal number is high and the receive sequence monotonically increasing, the best approach is to begin the search at the end of the received data. (Data is often transmitted in wireless systems in blocks with interleaving for error correction reasons. All the data of a block therefore needs to be received and decoded before any of it can be examined.) Therefore, a preferred embodiment of the present invention is to take into account the number of received identifiers, whether or not there is one or more identifiers to be looked for, and the numeric distribution of the looked for identifiers in the selection of the search protocol utilized for each search occurrence.
Referring now to
Although particular processing functions have been described as being performed by particular components, it should be understood that performance of processing functions may be distributed among system components as desired.
Although the present invention has been described in detail, it is to be understood that the invention is not limited thereto, and that various changes can be made therein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, which is defined by the attached claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/430,240 filed on Mar. 26, 2012, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,897,189 on Nov. 25, 2014, which is a continuation of Ser. No. 11/081,294 filed on Mar. 16, 2005, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 8,144,637 on Mar. 27, 2012, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/334,433 filed on Dec. 30, 2002, which issued as U.S. Pat. No. 6,950,684 on Sep. 27, 2005, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/377,038, filed on May 1, 2002, the contents of each which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4449248 | Leslie et al. | May 1984 | A |
4668949 | Akahori et al. | May 1987 | A |
4763322 | Eizenhofer | Aug 1988 | A |
5128665 | DeLuca et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5278831 | Mabey et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5303379 | Khoyi et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5428766 | Seaman | Jun 1995 | A |
5444672 | Kushita | Aug 1995 | A |
5471655 | Kivari | Nov 1995 | A |
5475374 | Moore | Dec 1995 | A |
5509015 | Tiedemann et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5511110 | Drucker | Apr 1996 | A |
5566357 | Holcman | Oct 1996 | A |
5579372 | Astrom | Nov 1996 | A |
5581804 | Cameron et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5584048 | Wieczorek | Dec 1996 | A |
5590396 | Henry | Dec 1996 | A |
5596318 | Mitchell | Jan 1997 | A |
5625882 | Vook et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5629940 | Gaskill | May 1997 | A |
5729544 | Lev et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5822689 | Hwang | Oct 1998 | A |
5857146 | Kido | Jan 1999 | A |
5881055 | Kondo | Mar 1999 | A |
5905443 | Olds et al. | May 1999 | A |
5918170 | Oksanen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5923649 | Raith | Jul 1999 | A |
5946629 | Sawyer et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6034949 | Gellhaus | Mar 2000 | A |
6044069 | Wan | Mar 2000 | A |
6072784 | Agrawal et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6097704 | Jackson et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6144656 | Kinnunen et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6154642 | Dumont et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6195573 | Cassidy et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198913 | Sung et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212221 | Wakayama et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6215778 | Lomp et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6246867 | Jakobsson | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6278887 | Son et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6282183 | Harris et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6289464 | Wecker et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6308068 | Kunkel | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6310558 | Minami | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6330234 | Tomasi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333939 | Butler et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335922 | Tiedemann, Jr. et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6356595 | Czaja et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6366572 | Esterberg et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6438375 | Muller | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6463307 | Larsson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473607 | Shohara et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477151 | Oksala | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6477382 | Mansfield et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480476 | Willars | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6480504 | Wang et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6519234 | Werkander | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6522873 | Moles et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532220 | Carneal et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6594499 | Andersson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606502 | Chung Kam Chung et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6618256 | Bovio et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622251 | Lindskog et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6636745 | Oprescu-Surcobe et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6650912 | Chen et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6665520 | Romans | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6665722 | Elliott | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6725068 | Higuchi | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6775259 | Ranta | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6785258 | Garcia, Jr. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6823191 | Laroia et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6831909 | Koo et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6879579 | Myles et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6961571 | Rune et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
7099659 | Schnake | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7126926 | Bjorklund et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7142526 | Hokao | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7187665 | Nakamura | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7203184 | Ido et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7218663 | Yokota et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7277737 | Vollmer et al. | Oct 2007 | B1 |
7305012 | De Angeli | Dec 2007 | B1 |
7366536 | Hayashi et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7463608 | Bolgiano et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
20020037749 | Wager | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020090959 | Laroia et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020090960 | Laroia et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020141331 | Mate | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020187789 | Diachina et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002518 | Shibutani | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030032462 | Wang et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030214937 | Lindoff et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030223394 | Parantainen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235161 | Shoji et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030235169 | Pandey et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050171811 | Campbell et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20100002852 | Schmidt et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 928 119 | Jul 1999 | EP |
1 009 106 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1 065 626 | Jan 2001 | EP |
0 864 241 | Apr 2002 | EP |
0 801 876 | Nov 2003 | EP |
63-199526 | Aug 1988 | JP |
01-170129 | Jul 1989 | JP |
02-079526 | Mar 1990 | JP |
03-065830 | Mar 1991 | JP |
03-268626 | Nov 1991 | JP |
05-075528 | Mar 1993 | JP |
05-114883 | May 1993 | JP |
05-199150 | Aug 1993 | JP |
05-308317 | Nov 1993 | JP |
08-033008 | Feb 1996 | JP |
08-056381 | Feb 1996 | JP |
2000-253448 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2000-261364 | Sep 2000 | JP |
2001-036457 | Feb 2001 | JP |
2002-064589 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2002-094443 | Mar 2002 | JP |
9103037 | Mar 1991 | WO |
9111868 | Aug 1991 | WO |
9715154 | Apr 1997 | WO |
9921111 | Apr 1999 | WO |
9922352 | May 1999 | WO |
9927696 | Jun 1999 | WO |
0045281 | Aug 2000 | WO |
0069209 | Nov 2000 | WO |
0122606 | Mar 2001 | WO |
0133870 | May 2001 | WO |
0197538 | Dec 2001 | WO |
0233989 | May 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Holma et al., “WCDMA for UMTS: Radio Access for Third Generation Mobile Communications,” Revised Edition, Wiley, (Apr. 12, 2001). |
European Telecommunication Standard, “Paging Systems (PS); European Radio Message System (ERMES); Part 4: Air interface specification,” Jul. 1992, pp. 1-39. |
IEEE Standard for Local and metropolitan area networks, Part 16: Air Interface for Fixed Broadband Wireless Access Systems, IEEE Std. 802.16-2001 (Apr. 8, 2002). |
Sedgewick, “Algorithms in C: Part 5: Graph Algorithms,” XP0015377 (2002). |
ANSVIEEE Std 802.11,1999 Edition, Information technology—Telecommunications and information exchange between systems—Local and metropolitan area networks—Specific requirements—Part I 1 : Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications, (Mar. 18, 1999). |
Third Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; UE Procedures in Idle Mode and Procedures for Cell Reselection in Connected Mode (Release 1999), 3GPP TS 25.304 V3.10.0 (Mar. 2002). |
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; UE Procedures in Idle Mode and Procedures for Cell Reselection in Connected Mode (Release 1999),” 3GPP TS 25.304 V3.11.0 (Jun. 2002). |
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; UE Procedures in Idle Mode and Procedures for Cell Reselection in Connected Mode (Release 4),” 3GPP TS 25.304 V4.4.0 (Mar. 2002). |
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; UE Procedures in Idle Mode and Procedures for Cell Reselection in Connected Mode (Release 4),” 3GPP TS 25.304 V4.5.0 (Jun. 2002). |
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; UE Procedures in Idle Mode and Procedures for Cell Reselection in Connected Mode (Release 5),” 3GPP TS 25.304 V5.0.0 (Mar. 2002). |
Third Generation Partnership Project, “Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; UE Procedures in Idle Mode and Procedures for Cell Reselection in Connected Mode (Release 5),” 3GPP TS 25.304 V5.1.0 (Jun. 2002). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150078317 A1 | Mar 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60377038 | May 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13430240 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14551820 | US | |
Parent | 11081294 | Mar 2005 | US |
Child | 13430240 | US | |
Parent | 10334433 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 11081294 | US |