The present disclosure relates generally to reverse osmosis systems, and, more specifically, to a method and system for using separates volumes to enable a continuous process.
The statements in this section merely provide background information related to the present disclosure and may not constitute prior art.
Reverse osmosis systems typically use one or more membrane housings that have one or more membranes therein that are used to extract an essentially pure fluid from a solution. The desalination reverse osmosis membranes receive feed fluid from brackish or sea water and extract fresh water therefrom. Fresh water is extracted or separated when the pressure of the feed fluid exceeds the osmotic pressure of the fluid which allows permeate or product fluid to cross the semi-permeable reverse osmosis membrane. The fluid that is left on the input side to the membrane becomes higher in salt concentration because fresh water that travels through the membrane does not include the salt. The water that passes through the membrane is referred to as a permeate. The pressure required to produce fresh water is proportional to the concentration of the total dissolved solids (TDS) in this feed solution within the reverse osmosis housing. For typical ocean water, the concentration is about 35,000 parts per million (ppm) and the corresponding osmotic pressure is about 450 pounds per square inch (psi) (3,102 kPa). For 70,000 ppm feed fluid, the osmotic pressure approximately doubles to 900 psi (about 6,205 kPa). A typical seawater reverse osmosis system uses a series of membranes that recover up to about 45% of the fresh water and generate about 55% concentrate brine from the original volume of seawater. The net driving pressure (NDP) equals the feed pressure minus the osmotic pressure. The net driving pressure is the pressure energy available to drive pure fluid across the membrane.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
An outlet port 50 communicates fluid from the tank 40 to a high pressure pump 52 through pipes 51 and 53. The high pressure pump 52 increases the pressure of the fluid from the tank 40 and communicates the fluid to the membrane housing 54 that has a membrane 56 therein. A permeate pipe 58 drains permeate that passes through the membrane 56. The permeate pipe 58 is in communication with a permeate tank 60 that collects the permeate that passes therethrough. A brine pipe 62 communicates brine concentrated fluid through a valve 64 to a port 66 in the tank 40.
A controller 70 coupled to a concentration sensor 72 monitors the process and the concentration of the fluid within the tank 40 to end the process when the fluid within the tank 40 reaches a predetermined concentration. The controller 70 may also be used to control the various valves including valve 36, the valve 64 and the pumps including the high pressure pump 52 and the charge pump 34. In the process, feed fluid is provided to the tank 40 through the charge pump 34 and open valve 36. When the tank 40 is filled, the charge pump 34 is powered off and the valve 36 is closed. As the tank 40 is filling, air is vented from the tank through the air vent 41. Drain valve 42 is also closed during the filling of the tank 40 through pipe 38. During batch processing, the high pressure pump 52 is controlled to provide pressure. The valve 64 is also opened during batch processing to circulate the concentrated brine back to the tank 40. During batch processing, fluid from the tank 40 leaves the port 50 and enters the pipe 51 whereby the high pressure pump 52 increases the pressure and provides the desired pressure to the membrane housing 54 through pipe 53. Permeate exits the membrane housing through the pipe 58. The control valve 64 is adjusted to achieve a desired flow rate and depressurized brine fluid returns to the tank 40 through port 66.
As the batch of fluid within the tank is processed, concentrated brine is recirculated back to the tank 40 which increases the concentration of the fluid within the tank 40. As the fluid becomes increasingly concentrated, the pressure output by the high pressure pump 52 is increased. The recirculation of the fluid from the tank 40 to the high pressure pump 52 through the membrane housing 54, brine pipe 62 and the valve 64 continues until the sensor 72 measures the ending concentration.
Once the desired concentration has been achieved, the high pressure pump 52 is stopped and the concentrate within the tank 40 is drained through the drain valve 42 which is opened to drain the fluid into the brine tank 46. Thereafter, the drain valve 42 is closed and the charge pump 34 is activated and the valve 36 is open to provide a fresh batch of feed fluid to the tank 40.
Referring now to
Referring now to
The present disclosure provides a method and system for batch processing feed fluid in a system that can continuously operate in an efficient manner.
In one aspect of the disclosure, a reverse osmosis system and method of operating the same includes a membrane housing comprising a reverse osmosis membrane therein. The membrane housing has a feed fluid input, a brine outlet and a permeate outlet; The system further includes a charge pump, a plurality of valves and a tank having a volume comprising a movable partition dividing the volume into a first volume and a second volume. The plurality of valves selectively couples the charge pump to the first volume or the second volume and the brine outlet to the second volume or the first volume respectively.
In another aspect of the disclosure, a method includes filling a first volume and a second volume of a tank, having a movable partition separating the first volume at a first end of the tank and the second volume at a second end of the tank, producing permeate with fluid in the second volume at a membrane housing, recirculating brine to the second volume from the membrane housing, and filling the first volume with feed fluid in response to producing permeate to cause the partition to move toward the second end until a concentration of fluid in the second volume exceeds a threshold.
Further areas of applicability will become apparent from the description provided herein. It should be understood that the description and specific examples are intended for purposes of illustration only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure.
The drawings described herein are for illustration purposes only and are not intended to limit the scope of the present disclosure in any way.
The following description is merely exemplary in nature and is not intended to limit the present disclosure, application, or uses. For purposes of clarity, the same reference numbers will be used in the drawings to identify similar elements. As used herein, the phrase at least one of A, B, and C should be construed to mean a logical (A or B or C), using a non-exclusive logical or. It should be understood that steps within a method may be executed in different order without altering the principles of the present disclosure.
In the following description, a method and system for managing the reverse osmosis system to minimize energy consumption of the high pressure pump is set forth. A process that achieves continuous operation by allowing recharge of fresh feed to occur while the batch process is processing permeate is set forth.
Referring now to
Another three-way valve 630 has a valve port 630A, a valve port 630B and a port 630C. The port 630C is in communication with the high pressure pump 52 and a brine drain valve 632. The brine drain valve 632 is in communication with orifices 634 and the brine reservoir 638. A total dissolved solid sensor or concentration sensor 635 may monitor the concentration of the drain or brine fluid entering the brine reservoir 638.
Another three-way valve 640 has a port 640C in communication with the brine pipe 62, a port 640B that is in communication with the port 642 (that is in communication with the first volume 612 of the tank 40) and a port 640A in communication with the port 644 which is in communication with the second volume 614 of the tank 40.
Referring now to
When brine is being purged from the volume 614, the system enters state 2, the valve states of the valves 620, 630 and 640 in state 2 are identical to those of state 1 with the exception of valve 632 which changes from closed to open. When valve 632 opens, brine continues to be pumped through the pipe 51, the high pressure pump 52, pipe 53 and the valve 632. Ultimately, the movable partition 610 moves in a downward direction at or near the second end 618.
In state 3 of
In state 4, brine is purged from the first volume 612. In this situation, the plurality of valves 620, 630 and 640 are in the identical state as that of state 3 with the exception being valve 632 which is placed in an open state. In state 3, the movable partition 610 moves toward the first end 616 until the sensor 72B senses a predetermined concentration of the first volume by way of the controller 70. The controller 70 then changes the state of the various valves and may change the speed of the high pressure pump 52 and the pump 34.
A few notable features set forth in
During the process, the flow rate through the membrane housing 54 as controlled by the high pressure 52 is optimized to prevent fouling and maximize membrane efficiency. The pump 34 continues to replace the permeate within the appropriate volume of the tank 40.
The orifices 634 reduce the pressure drop across the valve to maximize the valve life and to allow the brine drain to drain until the partition has reached the bottom of the tank in state 1. The flow resistance through the valve 632 allows enough resistance so that some permeate production is performed. That is, not all of the circulated brine fluid leaves the system but rather a portion of the circulating brine fluid reaches the membrane housing 54 through the pump 52. After state 2 and prior to state 3, the pipes 51, 53 and 62 between the various components are preferably kept to a small distance so the amount of dead volume of highly concentrated brine between the transition from states 1 and 2 to states 3 and 4 is reduced to a minimum.
Reducing the amount of brine in the dead volume of some configurations may also be important.
Referring now to
The spool valve 810 has a linear actuator 812 that is used to move a rod 814 to align the spool disks 816, 818 and 820 to their desired position relative to the various ports 830-844 formed in the casing 850 of the spool valve 810.
It should be noted that the illustration set forth in
In this configuration, the linear actuator 812 is disposed in the leftmost or most outward position away from the actuator 812 position. It should also be noted that a seal 860 is disposed between the port 834 and the port 842. By providing the seal 860, the high pressure portion end or portion and the low pressure end or portion within the spool valve 810 are separated. By alignment of the disks 816, 818 and 820, different flow paths may be formed through the casing so that fluid may be provided to and from the various devices in a similar manner to that set forth in
Effectively, ports 830, 838 and 832 act in a fluidically similar manner to three-way valve 620. The ports 832, 838 and 840 act in a fluidically similar manner to valve 630 and ports 842, 844 and 836 act in a fluidically similar way to valve 640.
Referring now to
In state 3, permeate is being made from volume 612 and feed fluid is entering volume 614. In state B, fluid is being communicated between ports 830 and 838, between ports 832 and 840 and between ports 842 and 836. As noted above, during the process of permeate production, the pump 52 may be controlled to increase in speed and therefore provide higher pressure to the membrane housing 54.
Referring now to
Referring specifically to
Referring now to
By providing the partitions 610 or 610′, the incoming feed fluid does not mix with the brine. This is different than the known semi-batch system described above in
Referring now to
In this example, two three-way valves 1310 and 1312 are provided. In a sense, the operation of the system is nearly the same as that set forth in
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Referring now to
Those skilled in the art can now appreciate from the foregoing description that the broad teachings of the disclosure can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this disclosure includes particular examples, the true scope of the disclosure should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent to the skilled practitioner upon a study of the drawings, the specification and the following claims.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/924,421 filed Mar. 19, 2018 which is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 15/783,184, filed Oct. 13, 2017 and claims benefit to U.S. Provisional Application 62/409,021, filed Oct. 17, 2016, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
659930 | Kemble | Oct 1900 | A |
893127 | Barber | Jul 1908 | A |
1022683 | Kienast | Apr 1912 | A |
1024111 | Anderson | Apr 1912 | A |
1066581 | Brown | Jul 1913 | A |
2715367 | Kodet | Aug 1955 | A |
2748714 | Henry | Jun 1956 | A |
3160108 | Sence | Dec 1964 | A |
3526320 | Kryzer | Sep 1970 | A |
3563618 | Ivanov | Feb 1971 | A |
3614259 | Neff | Oct 1971 | A |
3664758 | Sato | May 1972 | A |
3748057 | Eskeli | Jul 1973 | A |
3828610 | Swearingen | Aug 1974 | A |
3969804 | MacLnnes et al. | Jul 1976 | A |
3999377 | Oklejas et al. | Dec 1976 | A |
4028885 | Ganley et al. | Jun 1977 | A |
4029431 | Bachl | Jun 1977 | A |
4070280 | Bray | Jan 1978 | A |
4165288 | Teed et al. | Aug 1979 | A |
4187173 | Keefer | Feb 1980 | A |
4230564 | Keefer | Oct 1980 | A |
4243523 | Pelmulder | Jan 1981 | A |
4255081 | Oklejas et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4288326 | Keefer | Sep 1981 | A |
4353874 | Keller et al. | Oct 1982 | A |
4354939 | Pohl | Oct 1982 | A |
4432876 | Keefer | Feb 1984 | A |
4434056 | Keefer | Feb 1984 | A |
4472107 | Chang et al. | Sep 1984 | A |
RE32144 | Keefer | May 1986 | E |
4632756 | Coplan et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4702842 | Lapierre et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4814086 | Bratt | Mar 1989 | A |
4830572 | Oklejas, Jr. et al. | May 1989 | A |
4921603 | Yen | May 1990 | A |
4966708 | Oklejas et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4973408 | Keefer | Nov 1990 | A |
4983301 | Szucz et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4983305 | Oklejas et al. | Jan 1991 | A |
4997357 | Eirich et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5020969 | Mase et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5043071 | Anselme et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5049045 | Oklejas et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5082428 | Oklejas et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5106262 | Oklejas et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5132015 | Down | Jul 1992 | A |
5132090 | Volland | Jul 1992 | A |
5133639 | Gay et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5154572 | Toyoshima et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5320755 | Hagqvist et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5338151 | Kemmner et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5340286 | Kanigowski | Aug 1994 | A |
5401395 | Hagqvist et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5482441 | Permar | Jan 1996 | A |
5499900 | Khmara et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5647973 | Desaulniers | Jul 1997 | A |
5702229 | Moss et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5819524 | Bosley et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5951169 | Oklejas et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5980114 | Oklejas, Jr. | Nov 1999 | A |
6007723 | Ikada et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6017200 | Childs et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6036435 | Oklejas | Mar 2000 | A |
6059970 | Kohlheb et al. | May 2000 | A |
6110360 | Hart, Jr. | Aug 2000 | A |
6110375 | Bacchus et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6116851 | Oklejas, Jr. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120689 | Tonelli et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6139740 | Oklejas | Oct 2000 | A |
6139750 | Graham | Oct 2000 | A |
6187200 | Yamamura et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6190556 | Uhlinger | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6299766 | Permar | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6309174 | Oklejas, Jr. et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6345961 | Oklejas, Jr. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6375842 | Graham | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6402956 | Andou et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6468431 | Oklelas, Jr. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6508937 | Kawashima et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6547965 | Chancellor | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6589423 | Chancellor | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6613233 | Rusk et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6709599 | Rosenberger et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6713028 | Oklejas, Jr. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6797173 | Oklejas, Jr. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6881336 | Johnson | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6908546 | Smith | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6932907 | Haq et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6936140 | Paxton et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6942797 | Chancellor et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7077962 | Pipes | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7150830 | Katsube et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7285209 | Yu et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
20030080058 | Kimura et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040007517 | Grangeon et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040007526 | Dellby et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040104157 | Beeman et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040211729 | Sunkara et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20060157409 | Hassan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060157410 | Hassan | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060226077 | Stark | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060254981 | Efraty | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20070023347 | Chabot | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070056907 | Gordon | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070181497 | Liberman | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070199878 | Eisberg et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070289904 | Oklejas | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070295650 | Yoneda et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080023410 | Efraty | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080217222 | Efraty | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090152197 | Lilas | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090173690 | Oklejas, Jr. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19941349 | Mar 2001 | DE |
19945978 | Aug 2001 | DE |
10327401 | Jan 2005 | DE |
0570350 | Nov 1993 | EP |
1022050 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1022051 | Jul 2000 | EP |
1508361 | Feb 2005 | EP |
2204664 | Nov 1988 | GB |
2363741 | Jan 2002 | GB |
2377928 | Jan 2003 | GB |
56091802 | Jul 1981 | JP |
WO-9721630 | Jun 1997 | WO |
WO-9736124 | Oct 1997 | WO |
WO-0076639 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO-0187470 | Nov 2001 | WO |
WO-0209855 | Feb 2002 | WO |
WO-2005075061 | Aug 2005 | WO |
WO-06106158 | Oct 2006 | WO |
WO-2007096679 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO-07146321 | Dec 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
El-Sayed, et al., “Performance evaluation of two RO membrane configurations in a MSF/RO hybrid system”; Desalination, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 128, No. 3, May 1, 2000 (May 1, 2000), p. 231-245, XP004204830; ISSN 0011-9164; pp. 232-234; Figure 1. |
Geisler, et al.; “Reduction of the energy demand for seawater RO with the pressure exchange system PES”; Desalination, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 135, No. 1-3, Apr. 20, 2001 (Apr. 20, 2001); pp. 205-210; XP004249642; ISSN: 0011-9164; whole document. |
Written Opinion and International Search Report for corresponding PCT/US2017/056967, dated Jan. 16, 2018, 14 pgs. |
Ei-Sayed, et al., “Performance evaluation of two RO membrane configurations in a MSF/RO hybrid system”; Desalination, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 128, No. 3, May 1, 2000 (May 1, 2000), p. 231-245, XP004204830; ISSN: 0011-9164; pp. 232-234; Figure 1. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190184339 A1 | Jun 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62409021 | Oct 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15924421 | Mar 2018 | US |
Child | 16285784 | US | |
Parent | 15783184 | Oct 2017 | US |
Child | 15924421 | US |