1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a network for providing a communication system in a pipeline environment. More particularly, the present invention relates to a communication network configured to utilize at least a portion of the physical structure of a pipeline system as structured support for a communication network.
2. State of the Art
It is frequently desirable to provide a communication link along subsurface and surface pipelines. One benefit of establishing a communication network along at least a portion of a length of a pipeline, such as a gas or liquid pipeline results from the fact that such pipelines conventionally traverse an appreciable distance and monitoring and communicating along at least a portion of the length of the pipeline may improve performance and compliance with safety regulations. Yet another benefit for establishing a communication network along a pipeline results from governmental regulations wherein a pipeline configured for continuous monitoring is allowed to sustain higher mass flow rates when such pipelines are continuously monitored for stress and/or defects. Otherwise, a pipeline traversing populated areas may be “derated” below its actual capacity due to safety considerations. In order to qualify for such a mass flow rate variance, the continuous monitoring must occur over some form of secure network to prevent tampering with sensor information indicative of pipeline conditions.
Various types of communication techniques along a pipeline structure have been proposed, including embedding fiber optics or other conductive communication conduits into the pipeline structure itself. Such integral modifications to the piping are generally unacceptable for various reasons, including the required modification to pipe fabrication techniques and requalification of the modified piping structure in accordance with various stress and reliability criteria. Therefore, such an embedded approach is undesirable.
Furthermore, structure of communication networks applied to the exterior of a pipeline system also present various security issues. Such externally accessible transmission media are not only subjected to ambient environmental conditions but are also exposed to security and tampering risks. Therefore, there is a need to provide a communication structure suitable for forming a communication network along at least a portion of a pipeline system, that does not require reengineering, modified fabrication and requalification of the pipeline structure and is not easily accessible for tampering or subject to other destructive failure mechanisms.
The present invention is directed to a method and system for pipeline communication. In one embodiment of the present invention, a pipeline communication system is provided. The system includes a pipeline having a surface extending along at least a portion of the length of the pipeline. A conductive bus is formed to, and extends along a portion of, the surface of the pipeline. A transmitter for sending information along the conductive bus on the pipeline is coupled thereto and a receiver for receiving the information from the conductive bus on the pipeline is also coupled to the conductive bus. Digital communication and, more specifically communication according to a serial protocol, may be employed for sending information.
In another embodiment of the present invention, a pipeline communication bus is provided. The pipeline communication bus includes a conductive bus including a first conductive trace and a second conductive trace with the first and second conductive traces being adapted to conformally couple with a pipeline at a surface extending along at least a portion of the length of the pipeline. A transmitter interface is adapted to operably send information along the conductive bus and a receiver interface is adapted to operably receive information along the conductive bus.
In yet another embodiment of the present invention, a method of communicating along a pipeline is provided. Conductive traces are formed and conformally coupled to a pipeline at a surface extending along at least a portion of the length of the pipeline. Information is transmitted along the plurality of conductive traces and the information is received from the plurality of conductive traces.
In the drawings, which illustrate what is currently considered to be the best mode for carrying out the invention:
Pipeline communication system 100 further includes a conductive bus 104 coupled at least to a portion of a length of a pipeline or conduit 102. Conductive bus 104 may be conductive to one or more forms of electromagnetic waves, namely electrical or optical conductivity. Furthermore, the electromagnetic waves may include analog and digital waveforms that may further employ various modulation schemes known by those of ordinary skill in the art. In one embodiment of the present invention, conductive bus 104 attaches or, alternatively, is formed thereto an exterior or interior surface of pipeline or conduit 102. The formation and attachment of conductive bus 104 to pipeline or conduit 102 is further described hereinbelow.
Pipeline communication system 100 further includes one or more interface nodes 118, a sampling of which are illustrated with reference to
Control devices 112 may include valve devices for baffle mechanisms for regulating or gating the flow of a fluid medium through pipeline or conduit 102. Furthermore, display devices 114 may present status information regarding including safety alerts or other notifications of interest.
In one embodiment of the present invention, network interfaces 132-138 and conductive bus 104 are configured for digital communication, and specifically to operate in accordance with a serial bus topology, an example of which is an RS-485 standard. Specifics of the operation of the RS-485 are available from IEEE of New York, N.Y., and generally is implemented using a differential voltage source as seen by the transmission line or conductive bus 104. Generally speaking, the RS-485 protocol allows multiple devices, up to 32, to communicate at half duplex on a single pair of conductors, such as conductive bus 104 with data transmitted differentially on two separate conductors.
With reference to
In one embodiment of the present invention, the conductive bus 104 is configured as a transmission line. According to transmission line theory, a traveling waveform along a long distance requires the study of how the system reacts to different frequencies. In one embodiment of the present invention, a transmission line is comprised of conductors 150, 152 fabricated according to trace-forming techniques such as plasma-spraying of a conductive strip of metal onto an insulative substrate.
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, the conductive material is plasma-sprayed onto a dielectric media that is attached to a rigid, for example, ferromagnetic conductor such as a pipeline or conduit 102 (
Plasma Spraying Properties
Generally, plasma spraying involves the spraying of molten or at least heat-softened material onto a surface to provide a coating. A powdered form of the material to be sprayed is injected into a high temperature plasma gas where it is rapidly heated and accelerated to a high velocity. When carried out correctly, plasma spraying is effected as a so-called “cold process”, in that the substrate being coated is kept at a low temperature during processing to avoid damage, metallurgical changes and distortion to the substrate material.
In one example, the plasma spray gun comprises a copper anode and tungsten cathode, both of which are water-cooled. Plasma gas consisting of one or a combination of one or more of argon, nitrogen, hydrogen, and helium flows around the cathode and through the anode, which is configured as a constricting nozzle. The plasma is initiated by a high voltage discharge that causes localized ionization and a conductive path for a DC arc to form between cathode and anode. The resistance heating from the arc causes the gas to reach extreme temperatures, dissociate and ionize to form a plasma stream. The plasma exits the anode nozzle as a free, or neutral, plasma flame that by definition does not carry electric current. When the plasma is stabilized for spraying, the electric arc extends down and out the nozzle, instead of shorting out to the nearest edge of the anode nozzle. This “stretching” of the arc is due to a thermal pinch effect. Cold gas around the surface of the water-cooled anode nozzle, being electrically non-conductive, constricts the plasma arc, raising its temperature and velocity. Powder is fed into the plasma flame via an external powder port mounted near the anode nozzle exit. The powder is superheated and accelerated along the path of the plasma until the particulate matter reaches the substrate where it rapidly cools and forms a coating.
Plasma spraying is primarily a technique used in welding technologies to help fill in voids left through normal wear of metallic objects or to add a corrosion, abrasion or erosion resistant coating to a substrate comprising vulnerable material. However, the process can be applied to form thin, uniform strips when employed under the right conditions and controls. With reference to
A thin plastic mask (not shown) may be attached to the alumina to serve as a guide to give the conductive portion of the sprayed material used to form the traces a substantially uniform edge and width. Mask width, therefore, controls the overall width of the conductive traces. A robotic control arm may be used to spray the length of the pipeline or conduit at a constant speed and volumetric spray rate to give the first conductive layer a uniform thickness. By varying the speed of the robotic arm travel, the volumetric spray rate, or both the thickness of a conductive material layer may be adjusted. Adjustment of the dimensions of both the traces and the alumina insulator may be used to alter the actual characteristics of the system.
When applied, the process of plasma spraying is generally not a completely uniform process from a chemical standpoint. A cross-sectional view illustrates partially melted particles, the presence of oxides, the presence of air gaps and voids and inconsistent edges. Such flaws affect the electrical characteristics of the system. For example, if the powdered form of the conductive material were completely solidified, it would have a relatively constant bulk resistivity. However, the presence of oxides and voids changes the resistivity and changes the overall characteristics of the system. In one example, acceptable percentages for the sprayed conductive material were approximately 30% air gaps and voids, 40% oxides, and 30% solid material.
Finite Model Topology
A model for the two-wire transmission line system follows a direct analysis of the physical system of two conductive traces sprayed on top of a dielectric media on a long pipeline or conduit. Basic physics and definitions of resistance, inductance, and capacitance provide a majority of the significant components and corresponding calculations.
An overall system configuration is determined assuming the data is transmitted down one trace and returned down another similar trace with a differential voltage driver. A physical model determines at least eight contributing components to the system. The eight components are as follows:
A series circuit element is determined to be along the intended path of the current, which is down the length of the pipe. A parallel circuit element is determined to be between the intended forward and return paths of the current or in parallel with any other grounding surface. When the system is expressed on a per length basis as most transmission line circuits are, the result of the model is a three-line system with parameters similar to the classical two-line system.
Since the conductive trace is determined to be carrying a current, each trace must have a resistive element along the path of the current. Unlike the classical lossy-transmission line model, each trace has an individual resistance associated with it. The reason that the classical addition of series components cannot be used is due to the fact that a third conductor is placed in close proximity to the two line system. In all actuality, the third line serves as a ground. This introduction of a ground plane also introduces several new components that alter the performance of the transmission line. However, the classical transmission line model may be used as a basis for constructing the three line model. As with any conductor, a resistive element occurs when currents flow through the conductors. Also since the transmission line sends data with AC portions in opposite directions at various frequencies, an inductive element in both the traces and the pipe is added. There will be inductance in each element due to the nature of the current flow between the two traces, as well as inductance from the “ground plane” behavior of the pipeline. For modeling, a simple three line system simplifies by treating each physical component as a line over which current can travel. Outside of the inductance interaction between components, there is no interaction between lines at this point on a per length (ΔZ) basis.
Along with the series circuit topology, a parallel circuit topology is also present since the highly resistive alumina element, when sandwiched between the conductive trace and the pipeline ground, form a parallel plate capacitor because of the differential voltage between the conductive traces and ground. Alumina, for example, serves as a dielectric media for the capacitive model component. Assuming that the pipeline carries almost no current (ground), the voltage differential and current between the trace and the pipe wall provide adequate charge to form the capacitance (CTP). There is also a less significant parallel-plate capacitor (CTT) formed between the two parallel lines in the same fashion.
Also, with the possibility of current leaking into the pipe that serves as an effective ground, a leakage resistance element is associated with the length of the pipe or to the outside environment. The leakage resistance will most likely be very large due to the presence of the alumina insulator's very low conductivity. However, because the alumina is not a perfect insulator, there is an extremely low amount of current leakage between the elements. The exact value of the leakage resistance is based upon the conductivity of the alumina layer and the thickness at which it is applied. Therefore, a leakage resistance will be associated between all three lines relative to each other.
The result of all of the elements together gives the model for the communication system of the present invention. The final result is a three line system with eight components with a final model appearing similar to two classical transmission line systems sandwiched together with resistive and inductive values put on the ground line. Also, a resistive and capacitive component may be added between the two major data lines.
In one embodiment of the present invention, conductive traces may be used for the formation of conductive bus 104. Referring to
In one embodiment of the present invention as illustrated with reference to
In the embodiments of the present invention such as those shown with reference to
An exemplary thermal spraying device which may be used in conjunction with the application of insulative layers 154, 158 and conductive traces 150,152 is disclosed in pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/074,355 entitled SYSTEMS AND METHODS FOR COATING CONDUIT INTERIOR SURFACES UTILIZING A THERMAL SPRAY GUN WITH EXTENSION ARM, filed on Feb. 11, 2002, which application is assigned to the assignee of the present invention and the entirety of the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference herein.
With reference to
The United States Government has rights in the following invention pursuant to Contract Number DE-AC07-99ID13727 between the U.S. Department of Energy and Bechtel BWXT Idaho, LLC.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2488195 | Ivey | Nov 1949 | A |
3477019 | Hartmann | Nov 1969 | A |
3596269 | Laska | Jul 1971 | A |
3740522 | Muehlberger | Jun 1973 | A |
3742350 | White | Jun 1973 | A |
3814616 | Kondo et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3826301 | Brooks | Jul 1974 | A |
4092950 | Hart | Jun 1978 | A |
4106332 | McKeown | Aug 1978 | A |
4172252 | Wiberg | Oct 1979 | A |
4340010 | Hart | Jul 1982 | A |
4420251 | James et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4472621 | Blackmore | Sep 1984 | A |
4477725 | Asawa et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4514443 | Kostecki | Apr 1985 | A |
4529974 | Tanaka et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4661682 | Gruner et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4677371 | Imaizumi | Jun 1987 | A |
4704985 | Rubinstein | Nov 1987 | A |
4736157 | Betker et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4756194 | Grandpierre et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
4774905 | Nobis | Oct 1988 | A |
4853515 | Willen et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4926165 | Lahlouh et al. | May 1990 | A |
4928004 | Zimmermann et al. | May 1990 | A |
4996419 | Morey | Feb 1991 | A |
5015958 | Masia et al. | May 1991 | A |
5024423 | Matsumoto et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5167983 | Liu et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5181962 | Hart | Jan 1993 | A |
5185183 | Gonda et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5195046 | Gerardi et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5254820 | Pesheck et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5279148 | Brandes | Jan 1994 | A |
5369366 | Piesinger | Nov 1994 | A |
5379644 | Yanagida et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5394141 | Soulier | Feb 1995 | A |
5410255 | Bailey | Apr 1995 | A |
5412173 | Muehlberger | May 1995 | A |
5416280 | McDermott et al. | May 1995 | A |
5446448 | Zufelt et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5551484 | Charboneau | Sep 1996 | A |
5573814 | Donovan | Nov 1996 | A |
5602492 | Cresswell et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5743299 | Chick et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5847286 | Klein et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5951761 | Edstrom | Sep 1999 | A |
6004639 | Quigley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6058978 | Paletta et al. | May 2000 | A |
6085413 | Klassen et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6194890 | Doyle et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6197168 | Matsunaga et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6210972 | Williams et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6271754 | Durtler | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6320400 | Black et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6362615 | Davidson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370964 | Chang et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6492898 | Sabbattini et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6498568 | Austin et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6501278 | Arabi | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6567006 | Lander et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6575663 | Kostelnik et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6626244 | Powers | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6715550 | Vinegar et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
6916502 | Moore et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7049811 | Schlicker et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
20010027708 | Stewart et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020022757 | Kostetnik et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20030047317 | Powers | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030152427 | Nickelson et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030161946 | Moore et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030175083 | Kostelnik et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030183015 | Richardson et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030190194 | Kostelnik et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198517 | Kostelnik et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040045365 | Richardson | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050092098 | Richardson et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050170683 | Richardson | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050284232 | Rice | Dec 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
3740498 | Jun 1989 | DE |
58-011057 | Jan 1983 | JP |
85018462 | May 1985 | JP |
2002060923 | Feb 2002 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050231382 A1 | Oct 2005 | US |