1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to Fibre Channel systems, and more particularly, to reducing deadlock problems in Fibre Channel Fabrics.
2. Background of the Invention
Fibre channel is a set of American National Standard Institute (ANSI) standards, which provide a serial transmission protocol for storage and network protocols such as HIPPI, SCSI, IP, ATM and others. Fibre channel provides an input/output interface to meet the requirements of both channel and network users.
Fibre channel supports three different topologies: point-to-point, arbitrated loop and fibre channel fabric. The point-to-point topology attaches two devices directly. The arbitrated loop topology attaches devices in a loop. The fibre channel fabric topology attaches host systems directly to a fabric, which are then connected to multiple devices. The fibre channel fabric topology allows several media types to be interconnected.
Fibre channel is a closed system that relies on multiple ports to exchange information on attributes and characteristics to determine if the ports can operate together. If the ports can work together, they define the criteria under which they communicate.
In fibre channel, a path is established between two nodes where the path's primary task is to transport data from one point to another at high speed with low latency, performing only simple error detection in hardware.
Fibre channel fabric devices include a node port or “N_Port” that manages fabric connections. The N_port establishes a connection to a fabric element (e.g., a switch) having a fabric port or F_port. Fabric elements include the intelligence to handle routing, error detection, recovery, and similar management functions.
A fibre channel switch is a multi-port device where each port manages a simple point-to-point connection between itself and its attached system. Each port can be attached to a server, peripheral, I/O subsystem, bridge, hub, router, or even another switch. A switch receives messages from one port and automatically routes it to another port. Multiple calls or data transfers happen concurrently through the multi-port fibre channel switch.
Fibre channel switches use memory buffers to hold frames received and sent across a network. Associated with these buffers are credits, which are the number of frames that a buffer can hold per fabric port.
The following Fibre Channel standards are used for Fibre Channel systems and Fibre Channel Fabrics, and are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety:
ANSI INCITS xxx-200× Fibre Channel Framing and Signaling Interface (FC-FS)-T11/Project 1331D; and ANSI INCITS xxx-200× Fibre Channel Switch Fabric-3 (FC-SW-3), T11/Project 1508D.
As discussed above, a Fibre Channel Fabric can consist of multiple switches connected in an arbitrary topology. The links between the switches use a buffer-to-buffer credit scheme for flow control so that all frames transmitted have a receive buffer. Fabric deadlock may occur if a switch cannot forward frames because the recipient switch buffers (receive buffers) are full.
The following example, described with respect to
In this example, hosts 11-15 can send data as fast as they can to a target that is two (2) hops (number of ISLs) away, for example:
For illustration purposes only, all traffic goes in the clockwise direction in
The receive buffers available for each ISL in the direction of traffic may get filled with frames addressed to the next switch. For example:
For the ISL between switch 1 and switch 2, the receive buffers on switch 2 get filled with frames for switch 3;
For the ISL between switch 2 and switch 3, the receive buffers on switch 3 get filled with frames for switch 4;
For the ISL between switch 3 and switch 4, the receive buffers on switch 4 get filled with frames for switch 5;
For the ISL between switch 4 and 5, the receive buffers on 5 get filled with frames for switch 1; and
For the ISL between switch 5 and switch 1, the receive buffers on switch 1 get filled with frames for switch 2.
The transmit side of a switch waits for
R_RDYs before it can transmit any frames. If frames cannot be transmitted from one ISL, then the receive buffers for the other ISL cannot be emptied. If the receive buffers cannot be emptied, no R_RDY flow control signals can be transmitted, which deadlocks the Fabric.
Many large Fabrics have paths that form rings within them, especially if they are designed to avoid single points of failure by using redundant switches. Such network traffic patterns may result in a deadlock situation disrupting networks using fibre channel switches and components.
Therefore, there is need for a system and method for minimizing deadlock problems in fibre channel switches.
In one aspect of the present invention, a method for transmitting frames using a fibre channel switch is provided. The method includes, determining a frame's priority based on a hop count for the frame; placing a frame in a priority queue, where the priority queue is dedicated to frames having similar priorities; selecting a frame for transmission based on the frame's priority, if credit is available, where a frame with a higher priority is sent before a frame with a lower priority; and selecting a frame with a lower priority if enough higher priority frames have been sent.
In another aspect of the present invention, a system for transmitting fibre channel frames is provided. The system includes a switch with at least two priority queues for placing frames with different priorities, where a frame's priority is based on a hop count depending upon the frame's destination; a counter that keeps track of frames that are transmitted from the two priority queues; and a credit control module that determines if credit is available before sending a particular frame.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a fibre channel switch having receive and transmit ports for transmitting frames is provided. The switch includes, at least two priority queues for placing frames with different priorities, where a frame's priority is based on a hop count depending upon the frame's destination; a counter that keeps track of frames that are transmitted from the two priority queues; and a credit control module that determines if credit is available before sending a particular frame.
In yet another aspect, a system for transmitting fibre channel frames is provided. The system includes, means for placing a frame in a priority queue, where the priority queue is dedicated to frames having similar priorities; means for selecting a frame for transmission based on the frame's priority, if credit is available, where a frame with a higher priority is sent before a frame with a lower priority; and means for selecting a frame with a lower priority if enough higher priority frames have been sent.
In yet another aspect of the present invention, a fibre channel switch having a receive port and a transmit port for transmitting fibre channel frames is provided. The switch includes, means for placing a frame in a priority queue, where the priority queue is dedicated to frames having similar priorities; means for selecting a frame for transmission based on the frame's priority, if credit is available, where a frame with a higher priority is sent before a frame with a lower priority; and means for selecting a frame with a lower priority if enough higher priority frames have been sent.
This brief summary has been provided so that the nature of the invention may be understood quickly. A more complete understanding of the invention can be obtained by reference to the following detailed description of the preferred embodiments thereof in connection with the attached drawings.
Definitions:
The following definitions are provided as they are typically (but not exclusively) used in the fibre channel environment, implementing the various adaptive aspects of the present invention.
“D_ID”: 24-bit fibre channel header field that contains destination address.
“EOF”: End of Frame
“E-Port”: A fabric expansion port that attaches to another Interconnect port to create an Inter-Switch Link.
“F-Port”: A port to which non-loop N_Ports are attached to a fabric and does not include FL_ports.
“Fibre channel ANSI Standard”: The standard (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety) describes the physical interface, transmission and signaling protocol of a high performance serial link for support of other high level protocols associated with IPI, SCSI, IP, ATM and others.
“FC-1”: Fibre channel transmission protocol, which includes serial encoding, decoding and error control.
“FC-2”: Fibre channel signaling protocol that includes frame structure and byte sequences.
“FC-3”: Defines a set of fibre channel services that are common across plural ports of a node.
“FC-4”: Provides mapping between lower levels of fibre channel, IPI and SCSI command sets, HIPPI data framing, IP and other upper level protocols.
“Fabric”: The structure or organization of a group of switches, target and host devices (NL_Port, N_ports etc.).
“Fabric Topology”: A topology where a device is directly attached to a fibre channel fabric that uses destination identifiers embedded in frame headers to route frames through a fibre channel fabric to a desired destination.
“FL_Port”: A L_Port that is able to perform the function of a F_Port, attached via a link to one or more NL_Ports in an Arbitrated Loop topology.
“Inter-Switch Link” (“ISL”): A link directly connecting the E_port of one switch to the E_port of another switch.
Port: A general reference to N. Sub._Port or F.Sub._Port.
“L_Port”: A port that contains Arbitrated Loop functions associated with the Arbitrated Loop topology.
“N-Port”: A direct fabric attached port.
“NL_Port”: A L_Port that can perform the function of a N_Port.
“R_RDY”: Flow control primitive signal used for establishing credit. Receiving an R_RDY frame increases credit, while sending a R_RDY frame decreases credit.
“S_ID”: 24-bit fibre channel header field that contains the source address of a frame.
“SOF”: Start of Frame
“Switch”: A fabric element conforming to the Fibre Channel Switch standards.
To facilitate an understanding of the preferred embodiment, the general architecture and operation of a fibre channel system will be described. The specific architecture and operation of the preferred embodiment will then be described with reference to the general architecture of the fibre channel system.
The devices of
The fabric element of the present invention is presently implemented as a single CMOS ASIC, and for this reason the term “fabric element” and ASIC are used interchangeably to refer to the preferred embodiments in this specification. Although
ASIC 20 has 20 ports numbered in
For illustration purposes only, all GL_Ports are drawn on the same side of ASIC 20 in
Each port GL0-GL19 has transmit and receive connections to switch crossbar 50. One connection is through receive buffer 52, which functions to receive and temporarily hold a frame during a routing operation. The other connection is through a transmit buffer 54.
Switch crossbar 50 includes a number of switch crossbars for handling specific types of data and data flow control information. For illustration purposes only, switch crossbar 50 is shown as a single crossbar. Switch crossbar 50 is a connectionless crossbar (packet switch) of known conventional design, sized to connect 21×21 paths. This is to accommodate 20 GL_Ports plus a port for connection to a fabric controller, which may be external or internal to ASIC 20.
In the preferred embodiments of switch chasis described herein, the fabric controller is a firmware-programmed microprocessor, also referred to as the input/output processor “IOP”). IOP 66 is shown in
Control register 62 receives and holds control information from IOP 66, so that IOP 66 can change characteristics or operating configuration of ASIC 20 by placing certain control words in register 62. IOP 66 can read status of ASIC 20 by monitoring various codes that are placed in status register 64 by monitoring circuits (not shown).
Each GL_Port may have an optical-electric converter, designated as OE0-OE19 connected with its SERDES through serial lines, for providing fibre optic input/output connections, as is well known in the high performance switch design. The converters connect to switch channels C0-C19. It is noteworthy that the ports can connect through copper paths or other means instead of optical-electric converters.
In the preferred embodiments of switch chassis described herein, the switch controller is a firmware-programmed microprocessor (IOP 66). IOP 66 is also shown in
Transmit and receive ports are connected by switch crossbar 50 so that they can transfer frames. IOP 66 controls and configures the switch ports.
In one aspect, the present invention prevents deadlocks on E-Ports by placing frames queued for transmission at a transmit port (for example, 205 in
In one aspect of the present invention,
The buffer-to-buffer credit module 302 ensures that frames are only sent if the receiving end (i.e. the device/port that receives frame 301B (not shown in this example)) has a buffer available to receive the transmitted frame. Buffer to buffer credit module receives R_RDYs 302A from a receive port (in this example, 206). As described in FC-FS and FC-SW-3 (incorporated herein by reference in its entirety), a buffer-to-buffer credit count is initialized during port login. The count is decremented whenever a frame is sent. The count is incremented whenever an R_RDY primitive is received from the other end of the link.
Frame priority corresponds to a hop count, where hop count is the number of ISLs a frame has to traverse before it gets to its destination. For example, in
In this embodiment each frame queued for transmission at a transmit port (for example, port 205) is assigned a priority number that is one less than the hop count, for example, a frame having a hop count of 2 has a priority 1. In this example, a lower priority number means that the frame has higher priority. However, the invention is not limited to how the priority numbers are assigned, for example, a higher number may be assigned to higher priority frames, as long as the hop count is used to assign the priority, and lower hop counts have higher priority.
Module 301 has an individual queue for each priority number. A frame is placed in a particular queue based on its priority number. For example, queue 401 has N−1 queues that are used for placing frames. Priority queue 0 keeps frames with priority number 0 (in this example, the highest priority frame), priority queue 1 keeps frames that have priority number 1, and so forth.
Every priority queue (0 to N−1) has a counter 402 that is used to avoid a situation where low priority frames are not sent because a switch has a constant flow of higher priority frames. Each counter 402 is initialized to 0 when transmit port 205 is initialized. Transmit module 403 uses the method described below to select a queue for frame transmission.
As described above, a frame with a lower hop count gets priority over a frame with a higher hop count. Each of counters 402 counts the number of tries that are made by the queue(s) to transmit a frame. A lower priority frame can be sent if the counter for the next highest priority is at 2 or if there are no higher priority frames and the total transmit credit available is greater than what is needed for the lower priority frame.
The number “2” ensures that more higher priority frames than lower priorities are sent if the higher priority frames are queued. A lower priority frame is not sent until either the sum of the empty receive buffers at port 404, and receive buffers filled with higher priority frames at 404, is greater than or equal the hop count for the lower priority frame. This ensures that higher priority frames can always be sent even after lower priority frames are sent, because enough receive buffers in 404 are either empty or contain higher priority frames that will be able to move on and empty those buffers.
It is noteworthy that the present invention is not limited to a counter value “2”, any other value may be used to adapt the aspects of the present invention.
The foregoing allows frames with lower priority to be transmitted, while ensuring that whenever a lower priority frame is sent, the number of receive buffers at port 404 that are either empty or contain higher priority frames is greater than or equal to the hop count of the frame just transmitted. Counter 402 is cleared to zero whenever a lower priority frame (i.e. in this example, with a higher priority number) is sent.
The following provides an example with respect to
In step S502, if no transmit queues (401) have any frames, then port 205 waits for frames. If there are queued frames in 401, the process moves to step S503.
In step S503, the process selects the highest priority transmit queue (i.e. in this example, the queue with the lowest priority number (0 to N−1)) that has frames queued for transmission.
In step S504, the process determines if credit is available for transmitting the frame from the particular priority queue. This is performed by buffer-to-buffer credit module 302 (
In step S505, the process compares the count associated with a particular queue. Counter 402 performs this. In one aspect the count is compared with 2.
If the count is less than 2, the process goes to step S506. In step S506, the queue count (by counter 402) is incremented by 1, and the process goes to step S507. In step S507, if the particular queue is empty, the process goes back to S501, otherwise the frame is sent in step S508.
If the count is greater than 2, then in step S509 the count for the queue is cleared to 0, and the process goes to 510. In step S510, the process determines if this is the last (lowest priority) queue, if yes, then the process goes back to step S501. Otherwise the process moves to step S511. In step S511, the next highest priority queue is selected. This provides lower priority queues a chance to send frames. The process moves to step S505 to see if a frame from that queue can be transmitted.
It is assumed that all frames that arrive at a destination switch are delivered to N-ports. This means that all frames sent by a switch with priority 0 (1 hop count) will be delivered and the receive buffers at the receive end of the ISL will be freed, with R_RDYs being sent. Since priority 0 is highest, at least one receive buffer on every ISL will either be filled with a frame sent as priority 0, or be empty. Hence all frames queued at priority 0 can be sent, and all the receive buffers used for them can be cleared.
If all frames in a switch queued at priority N or higher can be sent, and if at any time there are at least N+1 receive buffers with higher priority frames or empty, then all neighboring switches will always be able to send priority N+1 frames (which become priority N when received). The requirement of at least N+1 receive buffers that are either empty or filled with higher priority frames is ensured by the algorithm for sending lower priority frames, which only sends lower priority frames if at least 2**N higher priority frames have been sent, or if transmit credit (empty receive buffers) is greater than N.
In one aspect of the present invention, lower priority frames can be sent and deadlock situations can be reduced. This improves the overall efficiency of a network using fibre channel switches.
Although the present invention has been described with reference to specific embodiments, these embodiments are illustrative only and not limiting. Many other applications and embodiments of the present invention will be apparent in light of this disclosure and the following claims.
This application claims priority to U.S. provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/542,186, filed on Feb. 5, 2004, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4081612 | Hafner | Mar 1978 | A |
4162375 | Schlichte | Jul 1979 | A |
4200929 | Davidjuk et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4258418 | Heath | Mar 1981 | A |
4344132 | Dixon et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4382159 | Bowditch | May 1983 | A |
4425640 | Philip et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4546468 | Christmas et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
4569043 | Simmons et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4691296 | Struger | Sep 1987 | A |
4716561 | Angell et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4725835 | Schreiner et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4821034 | Anderson et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4860193 | Bentley et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4980857 | Walter et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5025370 | Koegel et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5051742 | Hullett et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5090011 | Fukuta et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5115430 | Hahne et al. | May 1992 | A |
5144622 | Takiyasu et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5260933 | Rouse | Nov 1993 | A |
5260935 | Turner | Nov 1993 | A |
5339311 | Turner | Aug 1994 | A |
5367520 | Cordell | Nov 1994 | A |
5390173 | Spinney et al. | Feb 1995 | A |
5537400 | Diaz et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5568165 | Kimura | Oct 1996 | A |
5590125 | Acampora et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5594672 | Hicks | Jan 1997 | A |
5598541 | Malladi | Jan 1997 | A |
5610745 | Bennett | Mar 1997 | A |
5666483 | McClary | Sep 1997 | A |
5677909 | Heide | Oct 1997 | A |
5687172 | Cloonan et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5732206 | Mendel | Mar 1998 | A |
5748612 | Stoevhase et al. | May 1998 | A |
5764927 | Murphy et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768271 | Seid et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768533 | Ran | Jun 1998 | A |
5784358 | Smith et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790545 | Holt et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790840 | Bulka et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5818842 | Burwell et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5821875 | Lee et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822300 | Johnson et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5825748 | Barkey et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828475 | Bennett et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5835752 | Chiang et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5850386 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5894560 | Carmichael et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5936442 | Liu et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954796 | McCarty et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5974547 | Klimenko | Oct 1999 | A |
5978379 | Chan et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987028 | Yang et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5999528 | Chow et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6011779 | Wills | Jan 2000 | A |
6014383 | McCarty | Jan 2000 | A |
6021128 | Hosoya et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031842 | Trevitt et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6046979 | Bauman | Apr 2000 | A |
6047323 | Krause | Apr 2000 | A |
6061360 | Miller et al. | May 2000 | A |
6081512 | Muller et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6108738 | Chambers et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6108778 | LaBerge | Aug 2000 | A |
6118776 | Berman | Sep 2000 | A |
6128292 | Kim et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6134127 | Kirchberg | Oct 2000 | A |
6144668 | Bass et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151644 | Wu | Nov 2000 | A |
6158014 | Henson | Dec 2000 | A |
6160813 | Banks et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6185203 | Berman | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6209089 | Selitrennikoff et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6229822 | Chow et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230276 | Hayden | May 2001 | B1 |
6240096 | Book | May 2001 | B1 |
6252891 | Perches | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253267 | Kim et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6286011 | Velamuri et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6289002 | Henson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6301612 | Selitrennikoff et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6308220 | Mathur | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324181 | Wong et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6330236 | Ofek et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6333932 | Kobayasi et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6335935 | Kadambi et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6343324 | Hubis et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6353612 | Zhu et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6370605 | Chong | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6401128 | Stai et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404749 | Falk | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411599 | Blanc et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6411627 | Hullett et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6418477 | Verma | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421342 | Schwartz et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421711 | Blumenau et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6424658 | Mathur | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6438628 | Messerly et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449274 | Holden et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6452915 | Jorgensen | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6470026 | Pearson et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6509988 | Saito | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6522656 | Gridley | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6532212 | Soloway et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6570850 | Gutierrez et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6570853 | Johnson et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6594231 | Byham et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597691 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6597777 | Ho | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606690 | Padovano | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6614796 | Black et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6622206 | Kanamaru et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6643298 | Brunheroto et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6657962 | Barri et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6684209 | Ito et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6697359 | George | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6697368 | Chang et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6697914 | Hospodor et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6718497 | Whitby-Strevens | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6738381 | Agnevik et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6744772 | Eneboe et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6760302 | Ellinas et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6779083 | Ito et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6785241 | Lu et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6807181 | Weschler | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6816492 | Turner et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6816750 | Klaas | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6859435 | Lee et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6865157 | Scott et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6886141 | Kunz et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6888831 | Hospodor et al. | May 2005 | B1 |
6901072 | Wong | May 2005 | B1 |
6904507 | Gil | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6922408 | Bloch et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6928470 | Hamlin | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6934799 | Acharya et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
6941357 | Nguyen et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6941482 | Strong | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6947393 | Hooper, III | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6952659 | King et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6968463 | Pherson et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
6987768 | Kojima et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6988130 | Blumenau et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
6988149 | Odenwald | Jan 2006 | B2 |
7000025 | Wilson | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7002926 | Eneboe et al. | Feb 2006 | B1 |
7010607 | Bunton | Mar 2006 | B1 |
7024410 | Ito et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7039070 | Kawakatsu | May 2006 | B2 |
7039870 | Takaoka et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7047326 | Crosbie et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
7050392 | Valdevit | May 2006 | B2 |
7051182 | Blumenau et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055068 | Riedl | May 2006 | B2 |
7061862 | Horiguchi et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7061871 | Sheldon et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7076569 | Bailey et al. | Jul 2006 | B1 |
7092374 | Gubbi | Aug 2006 | B1 |
7110394 | Chamdani et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7120728 | Krakirian et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7123306 | Goto et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7124169 | Shimozono et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7150021 | Vajjhala et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7151778 | Zhu et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7171050 | Kim | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7185062 | Lolayekar et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7187688 | Garmire et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7188364 | Volpano | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7190667 | Susnow et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7194538 | Rabe et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7200108 | Beer et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7200610 | Prawdiuk et al. | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7209478 | Rojas et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7215680 | Mullendore et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7221650 | Cooper et al. | May 2007 | B1 |
7230929 | Betker et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7233985 | Hahn et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7245613 | Winkles et al. | Jul 2007 | B1 |
7248580 | George et al. | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7263593 | Honda et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7266286 | Tanizawa et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7269131 | Cashman et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7269168 | Roy et al. | Sep 2007 | B2 |
7277431 | Walter et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7287063 | Baldwin et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7292593 | Winkles et al. | Nov 2007 | B1 |
7315511 | Morita et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7327680 | Kloth | Feb 2008 | B1 |
7346707 | Erimli | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7352740 | Hammons et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
20010011357 | Mori | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010022823 | Renaud | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010033552 | Barrack et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010038628 | Ofek et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010043564 | Bloch et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047460 | Kobayashi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020016838 | Geluc et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020034178 | Schmidt et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020071387 | Horiguchi et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020103913 | Tawil et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020104039 | DeRolf et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020122428 | Fan et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020124124 | Matsumoto et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020147560 | Devins et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020147843 | Rao | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156918 | Valdevit et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020159385 | Susnow et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020172195 | Pekkala et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020174197 | Schimke et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020191602 | Woodring et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194294 | Blumenau et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020196773 | Berman | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030002503 | Brewer et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030016683 | George et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030021239 | Mullendore et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030026267 | Oberman et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030026287 | Mullendore et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030033487 | Pfister et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035433 | Craddock et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046396 | Richter et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056000 | Mullendore et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030072316 | Niu et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030076788 | Grabauskas et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030079019 | Lolayekar et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030084219 | Yao et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030086377 | Berman | May 2003 | A1 |
20030091062 | Lay et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030093607 | Main et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030103451 | Lutgen et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030115355 | Cometto et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030117961 | Chuah et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030118053 | Edsall et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120743 | Coatney et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120983 | Vieregge et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030126223 | Jenne et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030126242 | Chang | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030131105 | Czeiger et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030137941 | Kaushik et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030139900 | Robison | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030172149 | Edsall et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030172239 | Swank | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174652 | Ebata | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174721 | Black et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030174789 | Waschura et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179709 | Huff | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179748 | George et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030179755 | Fraser | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030189930 | Terrell et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030189935 | Warden et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030191857 | Terell et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030195983 | Krause | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030198238 | Westby | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030218986 | DeSanti et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030229808 | Heintz et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20030236953 | Grieff et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040013088 | Gregg | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040013092 | Betker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040013113 | Singh et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040013125 | Betker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040015638 | Bryn | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040024831 | Yang et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040028038 | Anderson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040054776 | Klotz et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054866 | Blumenau et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040057389 | Klotz et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040064664 | Gil | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081186 | Warren et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081196 | Elliott | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040081394 | Biren et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040085955 | Walter et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040085974 | Mies et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040085994 | Warren et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040092278 | Diepstraten et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040100944 | Richmond et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040109418 | Fedorkow et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040123181 | Moon et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040141521 | George | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040151188 | Maveli et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153526 | Haun et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040153914 | El-Batal | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040174813 | Kasper et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040202189 | Arndt et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040208201 | Otake | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040267982 | Jackson et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050023656 | Leedy | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036499 | Dutt et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050036763 | Kato et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050047334 | Paul et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050073956 | Moores et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050076113 | Klotz et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050088969 | Carlsen et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050108444 | Flauaus et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050117522 | Basavaiah et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050177641 | Yamagami | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050198523 | Shanbhag et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20060013248 | Mujeeb et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060034192 | Hurley et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060034302 | Peterson | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060047852 | Shah et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060074927 | Sullivan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060107260 | Motta | May 2006 | A1 |
20060143300 | See et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060184711 | Pettey | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203725 | Paul et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060274744 | Nagai et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070206502 | Martin et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0649098 | Sep 1994 | EP |
0856969 | Jan 1998 | EP |
WO-9836537 | Aug 1998 | WO |
WO-0195566 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO03088050 | Oct 2003 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050174936 A1 | Aug 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60542186 | Feb 2004 | US |