This application claims priority from Canadian Patent Application No. 2,411,955, filed Nov. 15, 2002, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The invention relates to the field of embroidery machines, and more specifically, to a system and method for reducing thread breakage due to needle puncture during the embroidery process.
Industrial high-speed embroidery machines generally have a workpiece support table which is mounted for movement along several axes relative to a needle carrying sewing head. The support table is driven by stepper motors which are responsive to signals from a computer control system. The signals are generated according to a digitized pattern. The workpiece is then moved under the sewing instruments through a desired path.
Typically, the sewing head includes a drive shaft to vertically reciprocate a swingable needle to penetrate a fabric to be embroidered and also to reciprocate a thread take-up lever to supply an upper thread from a supply and to tighten a stitch to be formed.
Thread breakage is a significant problem in high speed embroidering systems. It is estimated that thread breakage occurs once every few minutes in a 1000 stitch per minute machine. Effective upper thread tension control is considered important to achieving accurate stitching. If the upper thread tension is not properly controlled prior to needle penetration, thread breakage can occur. In particular, if there is too much slack in the upper thread, thread can wrap around the point of the needle, prevent loop seizure, break the thread, or interfere with correct stitch formation.
Several devices are known for controlling upper thread tension and hence for preventing thread breakage, as for example U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,320,712, 4,590,879 and 4,616,583.
Other systems for reducing thread breakage function by controlling the position of the needle thread relative to the descending needle to avoid contact between the two. For example in U.S. Pat. No. 4,706,589 to Tsukioka, a needle thread guide is disclosed for a button holing sewing machine. The needle thread guide is provided at the needle bar frame and located adjacent to the needle entry protects the needle thread from being struck by the needle when the workpiece is fed during button holing. The guide guides the needle thread outwardly when the needle descends, thus the needle thread positioned lower than the needle eye is protected from being struck by the needle. The guide is associated with the oscillating motion of the needle, but its direction of oscillation is opposite to the direction of needle oscillation, and its amplitude is almost twice the amplitude of the needle. A similar thread deflection device for zigzag stitching is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,949,657 to Hanyu, et al.
One shortcoming of these devices is that their mechanics limit their ability to effectively adapt to varying stitch and workpiece characteristics prevalent in modem high speed automated embroidery machine applications.
A need therefore exists for an improved method and system for reducing thread breakage due to the needle contacting the needle thread as it penetrates the fabric and that allows for the effective adaptation to varying stitch and workpiece characteristics and that is not limited by sewing machine mechanics.
The invention provides a method of preventing needle thread breakage between the needle and workpiece of an automated embroidery machine system by introducing an indirect path between a first needle penetration point and a next needle penetration point in the workpiece. The characteristics of the indirect path are determined by a sequence of instructions stored in the data processing system associated with the automated embroidery machine system. An advantage of the present invention is that it requires minimal or no modification of existing automated embroidery machine mechanics.
According to one aspect of the invention, a method is provided for minimizing contact between a needle point and a needle thread in a computer controlled embroidery machine, to prevent breakage of the needle thread by the needle point upon penetration of a workpiece by the needle during stitching. The method includes the steps of: determining a first straight path between a current needle penetration location and a next needle penetration location; and, moving to the next needle penetration location along a second non-straight path so that the needle thread is pulled away from the needle point.
Preferably, the method further includes the steps of: determining a probability of needle thread breakage for the first straight line path; and, selecting said second non-straight path if the probability is within a predetermined range.
Preferably, the shape of the second non-straight path is variable. Preferably, the shape of the second non-straight path includes sinusoids, curves, arcs, and straight lines. Preferably, the shape is modified in response to variables including thread tension, thread strength, thread diameter, stitch length, workpiece thickness, workpiece material, sewing speed, acceleration, speed of movement, and the distance between the needle point and the workpiece.
The invention may best be understood by referring to the following description and accompanying drawings which illustrate the invention. In the drawings:
In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of the invention. However, it is understood that the invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known software, circuits, structures and techniques have not been described or shown in detail in order not to obscure the invention. The term data processing system is used herein to refer to any machine for processing data, including the computer and control systems described herein. In the drawings, like numerals refer to like structures or processes.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Selection of an indirect path 470 is optional. In addition, the shape of the indirect path 470 is variable. The data processing system 200 determines the need for an indirect path based on factors including the location of needle penetration locations A, B relative to the direction of threading through the needle eye 2a. Typically, an indirect path 470 would be selected by the data processing system 200 for next needle penetration locations B lying in areas of high probability of needle thread breakage 430 as illustrated in FIG. 4. The data processing system 200 may determine the shape of the indirect path 470 based on factors including the probability of needle thread breakage. Thus, for next needle penetration locations B lying in a high probability of needle thread breakage area 430 the degree of distortion of the indirect path 470 may be greater than the degree of distortion of the indirect path for next needle penetration locations B located in areas of decreasing probability of needle thread breakage 440, 450. The shape of the indirect path 470 is variable and may include sinusoids, curves, arcs, and straight lines. Other factors in determining the need for an indirect path and the shape of the indirect path include thread tension, thread strength, thread diameter, stitch length, workpiece thickness, workpiece material, sewing speed, acceleration, speed of movement, and the distance between the needle point and the workpiece. Note that it is important to keep the needle thread straight.
Referring to
Although the invention has been described with reference to certain specific embodiments, various modifications thereof will be apparent to those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as outlined in the claims appended hereto.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2411955 | Nov 2002 | CA | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1129588 | Onderdonk | Feb 1915 | A |
1548464 | Hemleb | Aug 1925 | A |
2173320 | De Voe | Sep 1939 | A |
3083661 | Patrick | Apr 1963 | A |
3476067 | Johnson | Nov 1969 | A |
3587495 | Johnson | Jun 1971 | A |
3877405 | Dorosz et al. | Apr 1975 | A |
4215641 | Dobrjanskyj et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4269131 | Principe | May 1981 | A |
4301757 | Tonomura | Nov 1981 | A |
4320712 | Johnson | Mar 1982 | A |
4503788 | Giannuzzi et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4506612 | Yanagi | Mar 1985 | A |
4526117 | Willenbacher | Jul 1985 | A |
4582968 | Huber et al. | Apr 1986 | A |
4590879 | Matsubara et al. | May 1986 | A |
4616583 | Takano et al. | Oct 1986 | A |
4690083 | Hara et al. | Sep 1987 | A |
4706589 | Tsukioka | Nov 1987 | A |
4949657 | Hanyu et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5311439 | Hayakawa et al. | May 1994 | A |
5315945 | Nakano | May 1994 | A |
5319565 | Hausammann et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5320054 | Asano | Jun 1994 | A |
5410976 | Matsubara | May 1995 | A |
5520126 | Muto et al. | May 1996 | A |
5543005 | Monget et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5648908 | Chirn et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5899154 | Mizuno | May 1999 | A |
5931107 | Thrash et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6198983 | Thrash et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6293210 | Freeman et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1058451 | Jul 1979 | CA |
1198018 | Dec 1985 | CA |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040129191 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |