Method and system for processing ambiguous, multiterm search queries

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8433696
  • Patent Number
    8,433,696
  • Date Filed
    Friday, August 27, 2010
    13 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, April 30, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
In accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, a method and system are provided of processing a search query entered by a user of a device having a text input interface with overloaded keys. The search query is directed at identifying an item from a set of items. Each of the items has one or more associated descriptors. The system receives from the user an ambiguous search query directed at identifying a desired item. The search query is a prefix substring of each of at least two words relating to the desired item. The system dynamically identifies a group of one or more items from the set of items having one or more descriptors matching the search query as the user enters each character of the search query. The system outputs identification of the one or more items of the identified group to be displayed on the device operated by the user.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of Invention


The present invention generally relates to processing search queries and, more particularly, to methods and systems for processing ambiguous, reduced text, multi-term search queries.


2. Description of Related Art


There are many user-operated devices such as mobile phones, PDAs (personal digital assistants), and television remote control devices that have small keypads, which a user can use for text entry. In many of these devices, largely because of device size restrictions, the keypad is small and has only a small number of keys, which are overloaded with alpha-numeric characters. Text input using these keypads is cumbersome.



FIG. 1 illustrates a common twelve-key keypad interface found in many cell phones and other mobile devices, and also increasingly in television remote control devices. The keypad 10 includes twelve keys 12, most of which are overloaded with multiple alpha-numeric characters or functions. The same key can be used to enter different characters. For instance, the “2” key can be used to enter the number “2” and the letters “A”, “B” and “C”. Text entry using such a keypad with overloaded keys can result in an ambiguous text entry, which requires some type of a disambiguation action. For instance, with a multi-press interface, a user can press a particular key multiple times in quick succession to select a desired character (e.g., to choose “B”, the user would press the “2” key twice quickly, and to choose “C”, the user would press the key three times). Alternatively, text entry can be performed using T9 and other text input mechanisms that provide vocabulary based completion choices for each word entered. Neither of these methods is however particularly useful for performing searches because of the number of steps needed to get to the result. One deficiency of the multi-press interface is that too many key strokes are needed. A drawback of applying a vocabulary based word completion interface is the need for the additional step of making a choice from a list of all possible word matches generated by the ambiguous text input. Furthermore vocabulary based word disambiguation systems are designed typically for composition applications (as opposed to search applications) where user explicitly disambiguates each word by performing a word completion action to resolve that word before proceeding to the next word in the composition.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

In accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, a method and system are provided of processing a search query entered by a user of a device having a text input interface with overloaded keys. The search query is directed at identifying an item from a set of items. Each of the items has one or more associated descriptors. The system receives from the user an ambiguous search query directed at identifying a desired item. The search query comprises a prefix substring of each of at least two words relating to the desired item. The system dynamically identifies a group of one or more items from the set of items having one or more descriptors matching the search query as the user enters each character of the search query. The system outputs identification of the one or more items of the identified group to be displayed on the device operated by the user.


These and other features will become readily apparent from the following detailed description wherein embodiments of the invention are shown and described by way of illustration. As will be realized, the invention is capable of other and different embodiments and its several details may be capable of modifications in various respects, all without departing from the invention. Accordingly, the drawings and description are to be regarded as illustrative in nature and not in a restrictive or limiting sense with the scope of the application being indicated in the claims.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

For a more complete understanding of various embodiments of the present invention, reference is now made to the following descriptions taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:



FIG. 1 illustrates a keypad with overloaded keys in accordance with the prior art.



FIG. 2 illustrates a search system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 3 illustrates various device configuration options for a device for performing searches in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 4 is a flow chart illustrating a method for finding results with reduced text entry using an overloaded keypad in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.



FIG. 5 illustrates a many-to-many mapping of terms to the numeric equivalents.



FIG. 6 illustrates the two different couplings between multiple terms in a query.



FIG. 7 illustrates a data structure for retrieving results incrementally for each character input using the many-to-many mapping scheme in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.



FIGS. 8A to 8C illustrate the incremental results retrieved when a user enters characters in a search query in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention.





Like reference numerals generally refer to like elements in the drawings.


DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF EMBODIMENTS OF THE INVENTION

Briefly, methods and systems are provided in accordance with various embodiments of the invention for performing searches using ambiguous text input from devices having limited text input interfaces.


As described in further detail below, in accordance with various embodiments of the invention, methods and systems are provided for processing a search query entered by a user of a device having a text input interface with overloaded keys. The search query is directed at identifying an item from a set of items. Each of the items has one or more associated descriptors. The descriptors can include words in the name of the item or other information relating to the item. For example, in a television application, the item can be a television content item such as a movie, and the descriptors can be information on the title of the movie, the cast, directors, and other keywords and descriptions of the movie.


Using the text input interface, the user can enter an ambiguous search query directed at identifying a desired item. The search query comprises a prefix substring of each of at least two words relating to the desired item. A prefix substring of a word is a variable length string of characters that contains fewer than all the characters making up the word.


The system dynamically identifies a group of one or more items from the set of items having one or more descriptors matching the search query as the user enters each character of the search query. The group of the one or more items is displayed on the device operated by the user. The items are preferably displayed in an order of expected interest to the user.


The user types in the multiple term prefix input query by pressing overloaded keys of the text input interface once to form an ambiguous query string. In accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, the search space is initially indexed by performing a many-to-many mapping from the alphanumeric space of terms to numeric strings corresponding to the various prefixes of each alphanumeric term constituting the query string. In a numeric string, each alphanumeric character in the string is replaced by its corresponding numeric equivalent based on, e.g., the arrangement of characters on the commonly used twelve-key reduced keypad shown in FIG. 1. This mapping scheme enables the system in accordance with one or more embodiments to incrementally retrieve results matching the ambiguous alphanumeric input query, as the user types in each character of the query. The user does not have to explicitly specify the termination of each term to assist the system in disambiguating the input query; instead, the user only enters an input query that includes prefix substrings from multiple terms. The system can leverage off the multiple term prefixes to disambiguate it. The multiple term prefix based disambiguation method in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention reduces the amount of text and steps needed to enter a multiple term input query and retrieve results.


There are various possible applications for the search techniques described herein including, e.g., assisting television viewers in identifying desired television content items and channels, and assisting users of mobile devices such as cell phones and PDAs in performing searches for items in various databases (e.g., performing searches in directories of people or businesses, and searching for and purchasing products/services like airline tickets).


In the context of television systems, the term “television content items” can include a wide variety of video/audio content including, but not limited to, television shows, movies, music videos, or any other identifiable content that can be selected by a television viewer. Searching for television content items can be performed across disparate content sources including, but not limited to, broadcast television, VOD, IPTV, and PVR (local and network).



FIG. 2 schematically illustrates an overall system for performing searches with reduced text entry using various devices in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. The system includes a server farm or system 202, a network 204, and a variety of devices 206, 208, 210 operated by users with text input interfaces. In accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention, the server 202 processes search queries received from the user devices 206, 208, 210. In other embodiments, the search queries are processed on the devices themselves. As discussed below, the server 202 can be the source of search data and relevance updates. If part of a television system, the server 202 can also be the source of or be linked to a source of at least some of the available television content (e.g., a cable or satellite television operator).


The network 204 functions as the distribution framework for transmitting data from the server 202 to the devices operated by the users. The distribution network 204 could be wired or wireless connections or some combination thereof. Examples of possible networks include computer networks, cable television networks, satellite television networks, IP-based television networks, and mobile communications networks (such as, e.g., wireless CDMA and GSM networks).


The search devices could have a wide range of interface capabilities. A device, e.g., could be a hand-held mobile communications device 206 such as a phone or PDA having a limited display size and a reduced keypad with overloaded keys. Another type of search device is a television system 207 with a remote control device 208 having an overloaded keypad. Another possible search device is a Personal Computer (PC) 210 with a full or reduced keyboard and a computer display.



FIG. 3 illustrates multiple exemplary configurations for search devices in accordance with various embodiments of the invention. In one configuration, a search device (e.g., PC 210) can have a display 302, a processor 304, volatile memory 306, text input interface 308, remote connectivity 310 to the server 202 through the network 204, and a persistent storage 312. A device configuration for a device such as the hand-held device 206 might not include local persistent storage 312. In this case, the device 206 could have remote connectivity 310 to submit the query to the server 202 and retrieve results from it. Another configuration of the devices 206, 208, 210 may not have remote connectivity 310. In this case, the search database may be locally resident on a local persistent storage 312. The persistent storage 312 may be, e.g., a removable storage element such as SD, SmartMedia, CompactFlash card etc. In a configuration of the device with remote connectivity 310 and persistent storage 312 for performing searches (e.g., a television system 207), the device may use the remote connectivity for search relevance data update or for the case where the search database is distributed on the local storage 312 and on the server 202. A preferred configuration in a memory constrained device is the search data residing remotely on a server. Unlike composition applications where the “most frequently used or popular terms space” are small in size and can be maintained in a local vocabulary, search spaces are typically larger inherently because people instinctively use “unique word signatures” to recall a document of interest. Hence maintaining search spaces locally may not be practical in many devices that have insufficient local memory, making a network based search configuration preferable.


In one exemplary embodiment, a television system 207 may have a set-top box or other device with a one-way link to a satellite network. In this configuration, all search data including relevance updates may be downloaded to the device through a satellite link to perform local searching. In this case, the set-top box preferably has sufficient storage capacity to maintain search spaces locally. Local storage is preferably large in this case to circumvent the deficiency of a one-way link.



FIG. 4 illustrates a search process in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. At step 402, the user enters a character using an ambiguous text input interface, e.g., using a keypad with overloaded keys where a single key press is performed for each character entered. At 404, an incremental search system determines and displays results that match the input character entered at 402. Since the input is ambiguous, the match of results would include the matches for all the ambiguous input characters represented by the single key press. To address this increased set of matches, an ordering scheme is preferably used to order the results to improve accessibility to results expected to be more of interest to the user. The ordering of results can be based on a variety of criteria including, e.g., temporal relevance, location relevance, popularity and personal preferences (that may have been determined implicitly or explicitly) or some combination of these criteria. (In a television application, temporal relevance can be used to favor programs whose timing may be more of interest to the viewer. For example, if the user entered NBA, then the system would list the games in order of temporal relevance such as those in progress or are scheduled to begin in the near future are listed at the higher on the list. The popularity criterion can be used to favor programs or channels that are more popular than others. The personal preference criterion can be used to favor programs or channels that the user has indicated preference for in prior user selections. For example, if a user frequently scrolls down to “CNBC” and selects it, the system would over time place CNBC higher in the list of results over a more generally popular channel such as CNN. Furthermore, identity independent time-based usage pattern learning algorithms can be applied in conjunction with personalization to apply the results ordering rules in an appropriate context. Also, e.g., when using a PDA or cell phone to search for a business, the system may use location relevance as part of the ordering criteria.)


In addition, other ordering schemes can also or instead be used such as, e.g., character count based subspace biasing, examples of which are described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 60/695,463 entitled “Method And System For Incremental Search With Minimal Text Entry On Television Where The Relevance Of Results Is A Dynamically Computed Function Of User Input Search String Character Count” and filed on Jun. 30, 2005, which is assigned to the assignee of the present application and is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety.


The ordering criteria can give preference to the results matching the search query based on a lexical match of the type of query input, e.g., in the following order of preference: single term prefixes, multiple term prefixes, and lastly abbreviation matches.


If the user does not find the desired results at 406, he or she can continue to enter more characters to the search query at step 402. Then at step 404, the system will perform the search based on the cumulative substring of characters of the search query entered by the user up to that point.



FIG. 5 illustrates an example of the many-to-many mapping scheme from an alphanumeric terms space to a numeric string space. The exemplary terms “TOON”, “TOM”, “TOMMY”, which can be search terms entered by a television viewer to identify television content, are mapped to the numeric equivalents of their prefix strings: “T”(8), “TO”(86), “TOO”(866), “TOON”(8666), “TOMMY”(86669). This many-to-many mapping scheme enables incremental search processing by enabling even a single character entered by the user to retrieve relevant results. This many-to-many mapping is done during an indexing phase for all terms that can be used to discover a result.



FIG. 6 illustrates the two broad categories of multiple prefix terms 602 that can be used in search queries. The terms 602 can be tightly coupled terms 604, which are closely related such the terms from movie title or name of a person (e.g., all the terms in the names Gods Must Be Crazy, and Harrison Ford). The terms may be either ordered or unordered (e.g., Ford Harrison or Harrison Ford). Loosely coupled terms 606, on the other hand, are terms that are semantically related, e.g., as in the terms “Tom Volleyball” (Tom Hanks playing a role in a movie cast away with volleyball being a keyword). The prefix based multiple terms input described herein, in addition to being an intuitive mechanism for reduced text input significantly reduces the size of the result space compared to other search techniques in which any query substring could match with results. With these other search techniques, the ambiguity in input could significantly increase the result space size, particularly when the number of characters input is low. This would force the user to enter more characters and diminish the effectiveness of the search process.



FIG. 7 illustrates a trie data structure that can be used in identifying search results in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention. Each node 702 of the structure has numerical values from 0-9. Each node has the top M records 704 (determined from some ordering criteria) preferably in “in-memory” storage, which can be a memory that permits quick retrieval. These records are returned immediately to user based on the match string. The illustrated diagram shows the layout of the data structure for the terms “TOMMY BOY”. The number of prefix terms and the size of the prefix terms used for pre-computing the trie index are determined by the memory availability and computational capabilities of the system. One example of a trie structure used for incremental searching is described in U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/136,261 entitled “Method And System For Performing Searches For Television Content Using Reduced Text Input”, which is incorporated by reference herein in its entirety. In the FIG. 7 example, the size of the prefix terms used is 2 and the number of terms for pre-computing the trie index is 2. So when the user enters any of the search queries, “8 269”(T BOY),“86 269”(TO BOY), “8 2”(T B), “86 2”(T BO), the results would be retrieved from the top M records 704 if present there. If it is beyond the top M records, the records are retrieved from the secondary storage structure 706 if it is present there. If the results are not found in the secondary structure either, the system can perform an intersection of the top “N” records (N>=M) for the individual terms, in this case, e.g., “T BOY”. In preferred embodiments of the invention, the system would return the results obtained both from the trie walk (where results are obtained either from the top “M” records or from the secondary memory) and from the intersection method, where the intersection method would be deployed once the input character count exceeds a given threshold. The multiple prefix terms based search is thus realized in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention preferably by the combination of a (1) trie walk whose strength and efficiency is highest when input character count is low, and (2) an intersection process whose strength and efficiency is highest when the input character count is above a given threshold.


One characteristic of this method of multiple prefix terms based search in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention is the absence of an explicit term/word termination action. In other words, the system does not require each word in a search entry to be successively and separately resolved. The system in accordance with one or more embodiments of the invention disambiguates the input by leveraging off the multiple terms (both in the case of loosely coupled and tightly coupled terms).



FIGS. 8A-8C illustrate the incremental results obtained for an exemplary search query as characters of the query are input by a user in a television application. In FIG. 8A, the user has input a single character “5” with the intention that the character represent the letter “J”. In this example, the user's intent is to find “Tom and Jerry” television programs, and starts with entering “Jerry” in an unordered input. However, there are multiple matches for different terms due to the input ambiguity since the single button pressed represents several characters, in this case results relate to Koala, Lola, Life etc. These terms are ordered in the displayed results list 802, e.g., by the popularity of the matching document and the relevance of the matching term to the document, and displayed on the users' television screen.


As the user has not found the desired content relating to Tom and Jerry, he or she enters additional characters in the search query. As shown in FIG. 8B, the user enters a multiple term text input: “5 86”, which is intended to represent the letters “J TO”. The results for this query are shown at 804. Because of the input ambiguity ([Koala, Tooth], [Hallie Todd in cast for Lizzie McGuire] etc.), matches for several unrelated programs are retrieved and displayed.


As shown in FIG. 8C, the user then inputs a further character in the search query: “5 866”, which is intended to represent “J TOM”. With this further character input, the system is able to identify the content of interest, and displays the results in list 806.


Methods of processing ambiguous search query inputs from users in accordance with various embodiments of the invention are preferably implemented in software, and accordingly one of the preferred implementations is as a set of instructions (program code) in a code module resident in the random access memory of a computer. Until required by the computer, the set of instructions may be stored in another computer memory, e.g., in a hard disk drive, or in a removable memory such as an optical disk (for eventual use in a CD ROM) or floppy disk (for eventual use in a floppy disk drive), or downloaded via the Internet or some other computer network. In addition, although the various methods described are conveniently implemented in a general purpose computer selectively activated or reconfigured by software, one of ordinary skill in the art would also recognize that such methods may be carried out in hardware, in firmware, or in more specialized apparatus constructed to perform the specified method steps.


Having described preferred embodiments of the present invention, it should be apparent that modifications can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.


Method claims set forth below having steps that are numbered or designated by letters should not be considered to be necessarily limited to the particular order in which the steps are recited.

Claims
  • 1. A method, comprising: associating subsets of content items with corresponding strings of one or more overloaded keys of a keypad so that the subsets of content items are directly mapped to the corresponding strings of one or more overloaded keys by a direct mapping, wherein at least one overloaded key of the one or more overloaded keys is associated with a plurality of alphabetical and/or numerical symbols;ranking content items within at least one of the subsets of content items according to one or more ordering criteria;subsequent to the associating and ranking, receiving entry of a first overloaded key;selecting and presenting a first of the subsets of content items that is associated with the first overloaded key based on the direct mapping;subsequent to receiving entry of the first overloaded key, receiving entry of a second overloaded key the same as or different than the first overloaded key, the second overloaded key forming a string with the first overloaded key; andselecting and presenting a second of the subsets of content items that is associated with the string of overloaded keys formed by the first overloaded key and the second overloaded key based on the direct mapping.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said one or more ordering criteria include one or more of: temporal relevance, location relevance, popularity, personal preferences and/or character count.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein associating the subsets of content items with the corresponding strings of one or more overloaded keys comprises indexing said content items by performing a many-to-many mapping wherein a descriptor associated with a content item is mapped to a candidate string of one or more overloaded keys if the candidate string corresponds to an alpha-numeric string that matches the descriptor.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein a user presses the first overloaded key to cause the entry of the first overloaded key.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein said method comprises receiving entry of a plurality of overloaded keys corresponding to one or more words in an ordered format, the plurality of overloaded keys comprising the string.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein said method comprises receiving entry of a plurality of overloaded keys corresponding to one or more words in an unordered format, the plurality of overloaded keys comprising the string.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein said string represents at least part of a first word and a second word separated by a word separator.
  • 8. The method of claim 1 wherein said string of overloaded keys is processed by a server system remote from a user.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein said string of overloaded keys is processed by a device operated by a user.
  • 10. The method of claim 1 further comprising determining descriptors relating to the content items, wherein the second subset of content items comprises one or more content items each having a descriptor matching the string.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 wherein said content items comprise a television content item, and wherein a descriptor of the television content item includes title, cast, director, description, and/or keyword information relating to the television content item.
  • 12. The method of claim 1 wherein said content items include a product or service.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the first overloaded key is entered by a user on the keypad of a cell phone, a PDA or a remote control device for a television.
  • 14. The method of claim 1, further comprising using the one or more ordering criteria to update the subsets of content items associated with the corresponding strings of one or more overloaded keys.
  • 15. A system comprising: one or more computer memories collectively storing content items and instructions configured to cause one or more processors to control performance of a method comprising:associating subsets of content items with corresponding strings of one or more overloaded keys of a keypad so that the subsets of content items are directly mapped to the corresponding strings of one or more overloaded keys by a direct mapping, wherein at least one overloaded key of the one or more overloaded keys is associated with a plurality of alphabetical and/or numerical symbols;ranking content items within at least one of the subsets of content items according to one or more ordering criteria;subsequent to the associating and ranking, receiving entry of a first overloaded key,selecting and presenting a first of the subsets of content items that is associated with the first overloaded key based on the direct mapping,subsequent to receiving entry of the first overloaded key, receiving entry of a second overloaded key the same as or different than the first overloaded key, the second overloaded key forming a string with the first overloaded key, andselecting and presenting a second of the subsets of content items that is associated with the string of overloaded keys formed by the first overloaded key and the second overloaded key based on the direct mapping.
  • 16. The system of claim 15 wherein said one or more ordering criteria include one or more of: temporal relevance, location relevance, popularity, personal preferences and/or character count.
  • 17. The system of claim 15 wherein associating the subsets of content items with the corresponding strings comprises indexing the content items by performing a many-to-many mapping wherein a descriptor associated with a content item is mapped to a candidate string of one or more overloaded keys if the candidate string corresponds to an alpha-numeric string that matches the descriptor.
  • 18. The system of claim 15 wherein a user presses the first overloaded key to cause the entry of the first overloaded key.
  • 19. The system of claim 15 wherein said method comprises receiving entry of a plurality of overloaded keys corresponding to one or more words in an ordered format, the plurality of overloaded keys comprising the string.
  • 20. The system of claim 15 wherein said method comprises receiving entry of a plurality of overloaded keys corresponding to one or more words in an unordered format, the plurality of overloaded keys comprising the string.
  • 21. The system of claim 15 wherein said string represents at least part of a first word and a second word separated by a word separator.
  • 22. The system of claim 15 wherein at least one of the one or more processors is included in a server remote from a user causing entry of the first overloaded key, the at least one of the one or more processors controlling the receiving of the entry of the first overloaded key, the selecting and presenting the first subset of content items, the receiving the entry of the second overloaded key, and/or the selecting and presenting the second subset of content items.
  • 23. The system of claim 15 wherein at least one of the one or more processors is included in a device operated by a user causing entry of the first overloaded key, the at least one of the one or more processors controlling the receiving of the entry of the first overloaded key, the selecting and presenting the first subset of content items, the receiving the entry of the second overloaded key, and/or the selecting and presenting the second subset of content items.
  • 24. The system of claim 15 wherein the method further comprises determining descriptors relating to the content items, wherein the second subset of content items comprises one or more content items each having a descriptor matching the string.
  • 25. The system of claim 24 wherein said content items comprise a television content item, and wherein a descriptor of the television content item includes title, cast, director, description, and/or keyword information relating to the television content item.
  • 26. The system of claim 15 wherein said content items comprise products and/or services.
  • 27. The system of claim 15 wherein the first overloaded key is entered by a user on the keypad of a cell phone, a PDA or a remote control device for a television.
  • 28. The system of claim 15, wherein the method further comprises updating the subsets of content items associated with the corresponding strings of one or more unresolved keystrokes based on the one or more ordering criteria.
  • 29. The system of claim 15, wherein the one or more computer memories comprise a first computer memory remote from a user causing entry of the first overloaded key, and wherein the first subset of content items is stored on the first computer memory.
  • 30. The system of claim 15, wherein the one or more computer memories comprise a first computer memory of a device operated by a user causing entry of the first overloaded key, and wherein the first subset of content items is stored on the first computer memory.
  • 31. The system of claim 15, wherein said content items comprise information about audio and/or video content.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/235,928, entitled Method And System For Processing Ambiguous, Multi-Term Search Queries, filed Sep. 27, 2005, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,788,266, which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/716,101, filed Sep. 12, 2005, and entitled Method And System For Incremental Search With Reduced Text Entry Using A Reduced Keypad With Overloaded Keys, and U.S. patent application No. 60/711,866, filed Aug. 26, 2005, and entitled A Dynamic Highlighting Interface of Multi Word Prefixes of Results Obtained by Incremental Search with Reduced Text Entry on Television and Mobile Devices Using a Keypad with Overloaded Keys; U.S. Pat. No. 7,788,266 and U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/716,101 are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.

US Referenced Citations (215)
Number Name Date Kind
1261167 Russell Apr 1918 A
4045777 Mierzwinski et al. Aug 1977 A
4453217 Boivie Jun 1984 A
4760528 Levin Jul 1988 A
4893238 Venema Jan 1990 A
5224060 Ma et al. Jun 1993 A
5337347 Halstead-Nussloch et al. Aug 1994 A
5369605 Parks Nov 1994 A
5487616 Ichbiah Jan 1996 A
5532754 Young et al. Jul 1996 A
5623406 Ichbiah Apr 1997 A
5635989 Rothmuller Jun 1997 A
5745889 Burrows Apr 1998 A
5774588 Li Jun 1998 A
5802361 Wang et al. Sep 1998 A
5805155 Allibhoy et al. Sep 1998 A
5818437 Grover et al. Oct 1998 A
5828420 Marshall et al. Oct 1998 A
5828991 Skiena et al. Oct 1998 A
5835087 Herz et al. Nov 1998 A
5859662 Cragun et al. Jan 1999 A
5880768 Lemmons et al. Mar 1999 A
5912664 Eick et al. Jun 1999 A
5937422 Nelson et al. Aug 1999 A
5945928 Kushler et al. Aug 1999 A
5945987 Dunn Aug 1999 A
5953541 King et al. Sep 1999 A
6005565 Legall et al. Dec 1999 A
6005597 Barrett et al. Dec 1999 A
6006225 Bowman et al. Dec 1999 A
6009459 Belfiore et al. Dec 1999 A
6011554 King et al. Jan 2000 A
6041311 Chislenko et al. Mar 2000 A
6047300 Walfish et al. Apr 2000 A
6075526 Rothmuller Jun 2000 A
6133909 Schein et al. Oct 2000 A
6169984 Bogdan Jan 2001 B1
6184877 Dodson et al. Feb 2001 B1
6189002 Roitblat Feb 2001 B1
6223059 Haestrup Apr 2001 B1
6260050 Yost et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266048 Carau, Sr. Jul 2001 B1
6266814 Lemmons et al. Jul 2001 B1
6269361 Davis et al. Jul 2001 B1
6286064 King et al. Sep 2001 B1
6292804 Ardoin et al. Sep 2001 B1
6307548 Flinchem et al. Oct 2001 B1
6307549 King et al. Oct 2001 B1
6377945 Risvik Apr 2002 B1
6438579 Hosken et al. Aug 2002 B1
6438751 Voyticky et al. Aug 2002 B1
6466933 Huang et al. Oct 2002 B1
6529903 Smith Mar 2003 B2
6564213 Ortega et al. May 2003 B1
6564313 Kashyap May 2003 B1
6594657 Livowsky et al. Jul 2003 B1
6600496 Wagner et al. Jul 2003 B1
6614455 Cuijpers et al. Sep 2003 B1
6615248 Smith Sep 2003 B1
6631496 Li et al. Oct 2003 B1
6721954 Nickum Apr 2004 B1
6732369 Schein et al. May 2004 B1
6757906 Look et al. Jun 2004 B1
6766526 Ellis Jul 2004 B1
6772147 Wang Aug 2004 B2
6785671 Bailey et al. Aug 2004 B1
6801909 Delgado et al. Oct 2004 B2
6839702 Patel et al. Jan 2005 B1
6839705 Grooters Jan 2005 B1
6850693 Young et al. Feb 2005 B2
6865575 Smith et al. Mar 2005 B1
6865746 Herrington et al. Mar 2005 B1
6907273 Smethers Jun 2005 B1
6965374 Villet et al. Nov 2005 B2
7013304 Schuetze et al. Mar 2006 B1
7117207 Kerschberg et al. Oct 2006 B1
7130866 Schaffer Oct 2006 B2
7136854 Smith Nov 2006 B2
7146627 Ismail et al. Dec 2006 B1
7149983 Robertson et al. Dec 2006 B1
7213256 Kikinis May 2007 B1
7225180 Donaldson et al. May 2007 B2
7225184 Carrasco et al. May 2007 B2
7225455 Bennington et al. May 2007 B2
7269548 Fux et al. Sep 2007 B2
7293231 Gunn et al. Nov 2007 B1
7487151 Yamamoto et al. Feb 2009 B2
7536384 Venkataraman et al. May 2009 B2
7594244 Scholl et al. Sep 2009 B2
20020002550 Berman Jan 2002 A1
20020042791 Smith et al. Apr 2002 A1
20020052873 Delgado et al. May 2002 A1
20020059621 Thomas et al. May 2002 A1
20020083448 Johnson Jun 2002 A1
20020133481 Smith et al. Sep 2002 A1
20020144267 Gutta et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020152190 Biebesheimer et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020184373 Maes Dec 2002 A1
20020188488 Hinkle Dec 2002 A1
20020199194 Ali Dec 2002 A1
20030005452 Rodriguez Jan 2003 A1
20030005462 Broadus et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030011573 Villet et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030014753 Beach et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030023976 Kamen et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030037043 Chang et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030037333 Ghashghai et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030046698 Kamen et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030051240 Schaffer et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030066068 Gutta et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030066079 Suga Apr 2003 A1
20030084270 Coon et al. May 2003 A1
20030103088 Dresti et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030217121 Willis Nov 2003 A1
20030226146 Thurston et al. Dec 2003 A1
20030229900 Reisman Dec 2003 A1
20030237096 Barrett et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040013909 Shimizu et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040021691 Dostie et al. Feb 2004 A1
20040024777 Schaffer Feb 2004 A1
20040046744 Rafii et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040049783 Lemmons et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040054520 Dehlinger et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040073926 Nakamura et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078815 Lemmons et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040078816 Johnson Apr 2004 A1
20040078820 Nickum Apr 2004 A1
20040083198 Bradford et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040093616 Johnson May 2004 A1
20040111745 Schein et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040128686 Boyer et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040139091 Shin Jul 2004 A1
20040143569 Gross et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040163032 Guo et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040194141 Sanders Sep 2004 A1
20040216160 Lemmons et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040220926 Lamkin et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040221308 Cuttner et al. Nov 2004 A1
20040261021 Mittal et al. Dec 2004 A1
20050015366 Carrasco et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050071874 Elcock et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050086234 Tosey Apr 2005 A1
20050086691 Dudkiewicz et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050086692 Dudkiewicz et al. Apr 2005 A1
20050174333 Robinson et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050192944 Flinchem Sep 2005 A1
20050210020 Gunn et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050210383 Cucerzan et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050210402 Gunn et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050223308 Gunn et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050240580 Zamir et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050246311 Whelan et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050267994 Wong et al. Dec 2005 A1
20050278175 Hyvonen Dec 2005 A1
20050283468 Kamvar et al. Dec 2005 A1
20060010477 Yu Jan 2006 A1
20060013487 Longe et al. Jan 2006 A1
20060036640 Tateno et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060059044 Chan et al. Mar 2006 A1
20060075429 Istvan et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060090182 Horowitz et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060090185 Zito et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060101499 Aravamudan et al. May 2006 A1
20060101503 Venkataraman May 2006 A1
20060101504 Aravamudan et al. May 2006 A1
20060112162 Marot et al. May 2006 A1
20060117019 Sylthe et al. Jun 2006 A1
20060163337 Unruh Jul 2006 A1
20060167676 Plumb Jul 2006 A1
20060167859 Verbeck Sibley et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060173818 Berstis et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060190308 Janssens et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060195435 Laird-McConnell et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060206454 Forstall et al. Sep 2006 A1
20060242178 Butterfield et al. Oct 2006 A1
20060256078 Flinchem et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060259344 Patel et al. Nov 2006 A1
20060274051 Longe et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060282856 Errico et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070005526 Whitney et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070005563 Aravamudan Jan 2007 A1
20070016476 Hoffberg et al. Jan 2007 A1
20070027852 Howard et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070027861 Huentelman et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070044122 Scholl et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070050337 Venkataraman et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070050348 Aharoni et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061244 Ramer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061317 Ramer et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070061321 Venkataraman Mar 2007 A1
20070061754 Ardhanari et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070067272 Flynt et al. Mar 2007 A1
20070088681 Aravamudan et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070100650 Ramer et al. May 2007 A1
20070130128 Garg et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070143567 Gorobets Jun 2007 A1
20070150606 Flinchem et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070208718 Javid et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070219984 Aravamudan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070219985 Aravamudan et al. Sep 2007 A1
20070255693 Ramaswamy et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070256070 Bykov et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070260703 Ardhanari et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070266021 Aravamudan et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070266026 Aravamudan et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070266406 Aravamudan et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070271205 Aravamudan et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276773 Aravamudan et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276821 Aravamudan et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070276859 Aravamudan et al. Nov 2007 A1
20070288456 Aravamudan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20070288457 Aravamudan et al. Dec 2007 A1
20080086704 Aravamudan Apr 2008 A1
20080114743 Venkataraman et al. May 2008 A1
20080209229 Ramakrishnan et al. Aug 2008 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (9)
Number Date Country
1050794 Nov 2000 EP
1143691 Oct 2001 EP
1338967 Aug 2003 EP
1463307 Sep 2004 EP
WO 0070505 Nov 2000 WO
WO 2004010326 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004031931 Apr 2004 WO
WO 2005033967 Apr 2005 WO
WO 2005084235 Sep 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (41)
Entry
Ardissono, L. et al., User Modeling and Recommendation Techniques for Personalized Electronic Program Guides, Personalized Digital Television, Editors: Ardissono, et al., Kluwer Academic Press, 2004.
Dalianis, Improving Search Engine Retrieval Using a Compound Splitter for Swedish, Abstract of Presentation at NODALIDA 2005—15th Nordic Conference on Computational Linguistics, Joensuu Finland, May 21-22, 2005. Retrieved Jan. 5, 2006 from http://phon.joensuu.fi/nodalida/abstract/03.shtml.
Digital Video Broadcasting, http://www.dvb.org (Oct. 12, 2007).
Flinchem, E., U.S. Appl. No. 60/548,589, filed Sep. 1, 2005.
Gadd, T.N., Phonix: The Algorithm, Program 24(4), Oct. 1990, pp. 363-369.
Good, N. et al., Combining Collaborative Filtering with Personal Agents for Better Recommendations, in Proc. of the 16th National Conference on Artificial Intelligence, pp. 439-446, Orlando, Florida, Jul. 18-22, 1999.
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US06/25249, mailed Jan. 29, 2008 (2 pages).
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US06/33204, mailed Sep. 21, 2007 (2 pages).
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US06/33257, mailed Mar. 26, 2008 (2 pages).
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US06/33258, mailed Mar. 26, 2008 (2 pages).
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US06/40005, mailed Jul. 3, 2007 (4 pages).
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US07/65703, mailed Jan. 25, 2008 (2 pages).
International Search Report, International Application No. PCT/US07/67100, mailed Mar. 7, 2008 (2 pages).
Kurapati, et al., “A Multi-Agent TV Recommender,” In Proceedings of the UM 2001 Workshop “Personalization in Future TV,” 2001, 8 pages.
Mackenzie et al., Letterwise: Prefix-Based Disambiguation for Mobile Text Input, Proceedings of the ACM Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology—UIST 2001, pp. 111-120.
Matthom, “Text Highlighting in Search Results”, Jul. 22, 2005. Available at www.matthom.com/archive/2005/07/22/text-highlighting-in-search-results- ; retrieved Jun. 23, 2006. (4 pages).
Mokotoff, Soundexing and Geneaology, Available at http://www.avotaynu.com/soundex.html, retrieved Mar. 19, 2008, last updated Sep. 8, 2007 (6 pages).
Nardi, et al., “Integrating Communications and Information Through Contact Map,” Communications of the ACM, vol. 45, No. 4, Apr. 2002, 7 pages, retrieved from URL:http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id+505251>.
Press Release From TEGIC Communications, TEGIC Communications is Awarded Patent for Japanese T9(R) Text Input Software From the Japan Patent Office, Oct. 12, 2004. Retrieved Nov. 18, 2005 From http://www.tegic.com/press.sub.--view.html?release.sub.--num=55254242.
Review of Personalization Technologies: Collaborative Filtering vs. ChoiceStream's Attributized Bayesian Choice Modeling, Technology Brief, ChoiceStream Technologies, Cambridge, MA.
Roe, David et al., “Mapping UML Models Incorporating OCL Constraints into Object-Z”, Technical Report, Sep. 2003, Department of Computing Imperial College London (17 pages).
Silfverberg et al., Predicting Text Entry Speed on Mobile Phones, Proceedings of the ACM Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems—CHI 2000. pp. 9-16.
Supplemental European Search Report for 05826114.0 dated Aug. 20, 2009, 13 pages.
Supplemental European Search Report for 05826129.8 dated Aug. 11, 2009, 15 pages.
Supplemental European Search Report for 068381797.7 dated Dec. 9, 2009, 7 pages.
Supplemental European Search Report for 07761026.9 dated Jan. 28, 2010, 8 pages.
Supplemental European Search Report for PCT/US2005/040415 dated Aug. 11, 2009, 15 pages.
Supplemental European Search Report for PCT/US2005/040424 dated Aug. 20, 2009, 13 pages.
Talbot, David. “Soul of a New Mobile Machine.” Technology Review: The Design Issue May/Jun. 2007. (pp. 46-53).
Turski, et al., “Inner Circl—People Centered Email Client,” CHI 2005 Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Apr. 2005, pp. 1845-1848, 4 pages, retrieved from URL:http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id+1056808.1057037.
Wikipedia's entry for Levenshtein distance (n.d.). Retrieved Nov. 15, 2006 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Levenshtein.sub.--distance.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US06/25249, mailed Jan. 29, 2008.
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US06/33204, mailed Sep. 21, 2007 (3 pages).
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US06/33257, mailed Mar. 26, 2008 (4 pages).
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US06/33258, mailed Mar. 26, 2008 (4 pages).
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US06/40005, mailed Jul. 3, 2007 (4 pages).
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US07/65703, mailed Jan. 25, 2008 (4 pages).
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority, International Application No. PCT/US07/67100, mailed Mar. 7, 2008 (3 pages).
Complaint in Veveo, Inc. v. Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., and Verizon Data Services India Pvt. Ltd., U.S. District Court Southern District of New York, Civil Action No. 10-CIV-6709 (JFK), filed Sep. 9, 2010, pp. 1-14.
First Amended Complain in Veveo, Inc. v. Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., and Verizon Data Services LLC, U.S. District Court Southern District of New York, Civil Action No. 10-CIV-6709 (JFK), filed Nov. 16, 2010, 16 pages.
Verizon's Answer to First Amended Complain and Counterclaims in Veveo, Inc. v. Verizon Services Corp., Verizon Communications Inc., and Verizon Data Services LLC, U.S. District Court Southern District of New York, Civil Action No. 10-CIV-6709 (JFK), filed Dec. 9, 2010, pp. 1-17.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100325106 A1 Dec 2010 US
Provisional Applications (2)
Number Date Country
60711866 Aug 2005 US
60716101 Sep 2005 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11235928 Sep 2005 US
Child 12869991 US