The present invention generally relates to the production of securities, in particular banknotes, and more particularly to a method and system for processing stacks of sheets into bundles of securities, in particular banknote bundles.
In the context of the present invention, the term “securities” is to be understood as encompassing all kinds of security documents and/or valuable documents, such as banknotes, cheques, duty stamps, lottery tickets, passports, identification or travel documents, and the like. Preferably, the securities are banknotes.
Methods and apparatuses for processing sheets of securities, especially banknotes, into bundles of securities and stacks of bundles of securities (so-called “finishing” methods and apparatuses) are already known in the art.
Such finishing methods and apparatuses are for instance disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. U.S. Pat. No. 3,939,621, U.S. Pat. No. 4,045,944, U.S. Pat. No. 4,283,902, U.S. Pat. No. 4,453,707, U.S. Pat. No. 4,463,677, U.S. Pat. No. 4,558,557, U.S. Pat. No. 4,558,615, U.S. Pat. No. 4,653,399, European patent application No. EP 0 656 309 A1, International application No. WO 01/49464 A1, European patent application No. EP 1 607 355 A1, and International application No. WO 2008/010125 A2, all in the name of the present Applicant. A particularly advantageous solution is disclosed in International application No. WO 2004/016433 A1 also in the name of the present Applicant, which solution is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety and is particularly suitable for the production of an uninterrupted flow of securities with a consecutive numbering sequence. Other known solutions are disclosed in European patent application No. EP 0 598 679 A1, International application No. WO 2005/018945 A1, International application No. WO 2006/131839 A2 and British patent application No. GB 2 262 729 A.
As explained in the above-identified publications, it is common practice in the art to produce securities in the form of sheets or successive portions of a continuous web each carrying a plurality of security prints arranged in a matrix of rows and columns, which sheets or successive portions of web are ultimately cut to form individual securities, usually after numbering of each security prints.
The term “sheet” will be understood in the following as referring equally to an individual sheet as used in sheet-fed printing presses or to a portion of a continuous web as used in web-fed printing presses, which portion of continuous web is ultimately cut into sheets after the last web printing operation. At the start of the finishing process, a predetermined number of consecutive sheets (typically hundred sheets) are commonly stacked one above the other to form consecutive stacks of sheets, which sheet stacks are then processed one after the other so as to be cut row-wise and column-wise between the security prints to produce individual bundles of securities. These bundles are then usually stacked to form bundle stacks, typically of ten bundles each.
Within the scope of the present invention, and for the sake of clarity, the term “column” should be understood as referring to the arrangement of security prints one next to the other along a first dimension of the sheets, hereinafter referred to as the “sheet length”, while the term “row” should be understood as referring to the arrangement of security prints one next to the other along the other dimension of the sheets, hereinafter referred to as the “sheet width”, as schematically illustrated in
As is typical in the art, the dimensions (whether of individual sheets processed on sheet-fed printing presses or of successive web portions of a continuous web processed on web-fed printing presses) may for instance be as much as 820 mm in width per 700 mm in length (i.e. 820×700 mm). With such sheet dimensions, six (M=6) columns per ten (N =10) rows of security prints with dimensions of e.g. 130×65 mm might for instance be provided on the sheets. With sheet dimensions of 740×680 mm, four (M=4) columns per seven (N=7) rows of security prints with dimensions of e.g. 180×90 mm might for instance be provided on the sheets. For small sheet dimensions, e.g. of 420×400 mm, four (M=4) columns per six (N=6) rows of security prints with dimensions of e.g. 100×60 mm might for instance be provided on the sheets. The above examples are of course given for the purpose of illustration only.
In the schematic illustration of
Each bundle strip S of securities is then typically fed in sequence through a banding station BS comprising multiple banding units distributed along the length of each bundle strip S of securities (i.e. along direction×in
Each bundle strip S of securities thus provided with securing bands B, hereinafter referred to as a banded bundle strip S* of securities, is then fed out of the banding station BS to the subsequent processing station. In the illustrated example, each banded bundle strip S* of securities is fed laterally (along a direction A opposite to direction x in
The thus assembled stack-like formation SS* of banded bundle strips S* of securities is then fed stepwise (along direction x) through a second cutting station CS2 where the stack-like formation SS* is cut along the columns of security prints so as to output successive sets 2 of bundles 5 of securities, all banded bundle strips S* being cut simultaneously and stepwise by the second cutting station CS2. In this example, five (M=5) successive sets 2 of bundles 5 of securities, each provided with a securing band, are produced as a result of the column-wise cutting of each stack-like formation SS*, each successive set 2 consisting of a given number of bundles 5 of securities disposed next to the other, namely ten (N=10) bundles 5 of hundred individual securities each (i.e. the equivalent of one column of security prints of the original sheet stack SS). In the process, margins (not illustrated) at the right and left edges of the sheets (i.e. margins at the top and bottom of stack-like formation SS* in
Each set 2 of bundles 5 of securities then needs to be evacuated before the next set 2 of bundles 5 arrives. Each bundle 5 of the set 2 must further be separated so as to form a flow a spaced-apart bundles 5, as schematically illustrated in
Considering a typical processing speed of 10'000 sheets per hour, a new stack SS of hundred sheets will be supplied upstream of the first cutting station CS1 every thirty-six seconds (=(100*3'600)/10'000), which amounts to a new bundle strip S, S*, downstream of the first cutting station CS1, every 36/N seconds. In this example where each sheet carries five (M=5) columns and ten (N=10) rows of security prints, this means that a new bundle strip S, S* arrives every 3.6 seconds.
In the context of the above-described finishing methodology, it is important to ensure that the resulting bundles 5 that are ultimately produced each comprise the desired number of substrates, namely hundred substrates, not more, not less. For this reason, a counting operation is typically carried out during finishing so as to check that each bundle 5 contains the proper number of substrates.
Counting can be carried out by mechanical means, such as counting discs, as for instance disclosed in European patent application No. EP 0 737 936 A1. Alternatively, “touchless” optical counting solutions have been proposed, which optical counting solutions make use of optical systems to take an image of a side of a stack of substrates and derive a substrate count therefrom. Such solutions are for instance disclosed in International applications Nos. WO 96/22553 A1, WO 2004/059585 A1, WO 2004/097732 A1 and WO 2006/016234 A1.
According to International application No. WO 2006/016234 A1, optical counting is performed immediately after a cutting operation while the stacked substrates are static under the cutting means and, preferably, while the stacked substrates are still being compressed by compression means at the cutting station. It has been found however that this solution may not be very practical in practice as this leads to limitations in the way the image sensor used to take the image of the side of the stacked substrates can be located and may lead to inaccuracies in the measured image. Indeed, as illustrated in the Figures of International application No. WO 2006/016234 A1, the image sensor needs to be located at the downstream side of the cutting station so as to look at the freshly cut side of the stack of substrates which is still under the cutting means, which implies that the image sensor cannot be located right in front of the stack of substrates (as it would otherwise obstruct the path of the substrates being outputted from the cutting station) but at an angle with respect to the path of the substrates. Furthermore, the time available to take one or more images of the side of the stack of substrates while this stack of substrate is still under the cutting means at the cutting station is limited.
There is therefore a need for an improved solution where optical counting can be carried out with greater freedom and greater robustness without interfering with the finishing process.
An aim of the present invention is thus to provide an improved method and system for processing stacks of sheets into bundles of securities, in particular banknote bundles, where the number of substrates can suitably be checked by optical means.
Another aim of the present invention is to provide such a method and system that is simple to implement and robust, while guaranteeing that high production efficiency can be maintained.
Accordingly, the present invention relates to a method for processing stacks of sheets into bundles of securities, in particular banknote bundles, the method comprising the steps of:
The present invention also relates to a system for processing stacks of sheets into bundles of securities, in particular banknote bundles, the system comprising:
Advantageous embodiments of the present invention form the subject-matter of the appended dependent claims.
According to one embodiment, each bundle strip is provided with a plurality of securing bands distributed along a length of each bundle strip and counting of the number of substrates is carried out on the resulting banded bundle strips. This favours a proper counting operation as the stacked substrates within the bundle strip are secured together thanks to the securing bands.
According to a preferred variant of this embodiment, images of the longitudinal side of each banded bundle strip can advantageously be taken to further check for the proper presence of the securing bands along the length of the banded bundle strips.
According to another embodiment, counting of the number of substrates is preferably carried out several times along the longitudinal side of each bundle strip, for instance at least as many time as there are bundle positions in the bundle strip.
The system of the present invention is now illustrated by way of examples with reference to the appended illustrations, in which:
It suffices to understand that the finishing method generally comprises the steps of (see again
Similarly, it suffices to understand that the finishing system generally comprises (see again
According to the preferred embodiment illustrated in
More precisely, as illustrated in
This means that, in the example of
The image senor 100 is coupled to a processing unit 200 (not shown in
Preferably, the processing unit 200 is designed to compare whether the substrate count corresponds to an expected number of substrates (e.g. hundred substrates) and to issue a warning or error signal if the substrate count does not correspond to the expected number of substrates.
The image sensor 100 can comprise a linear sensor for scanning the desired portion of the longitudinal side 10 of the bundle strip S* while the bundle strip S* is moving before the image sensor 100. Alternatively, the image sensor 100 can comprise a array sensor for taking a snapshot of the portion of the longitudinal side 10 of the bundle strip S*. In any case, the image sensor 100 should be suitably designed to output an image I of a desired portion of the longitudinal side 10 of the bundle strip S. Obviously, in the present case where optical counting is carried out on banded bundle strips S*, the image I shall be take at a portion of the longitudinal side 10 of the bundle strip S* which bears no securing band B.
Preferably, a plurality of images I are taken at various portions of the longitudinal side 10 of the bundle strip S*. In this case where the bundle strip S* includes five (M=5) bundle positions, and therefore five securing bands B (see
Advantageously, in the context of the preferred embodiment where the optical counting operation is carried out on the banded bundle strip S*, the optical system 100, 200 can further be used to check for the proper presence of the securing bands B along the length of the banded bundle strip S*. In the present case, this necessitates that the image sensor 100 takes five additional images at the locations along the length of the banded bundle strip S* where the securing bands B are expected. Based on these images, it can then be checked whether a securing band B is located at the corresponding location and a warning or error signal can be generated if this is not the case.
Various modifications and/or improvements of the above-described embodiment might be carried out without departing from the scope of the appended claims. For instance, as already mentioned, the banding operation is optional and the optical counting operation can accordingly be carried out on the non-banded bundle strips S directly.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
09167085.1 | Aug 2009 | EP | regional |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/IB10/53496 | 8/2/2010 | WO | 00 | 4/5/2012 |