The present invention relates to a method and system for producing a synthesis gas in an oxygen transport membrane based reforming system, and more particularly, a method and system for producing a synthesis gas in an oxygen transport membrane based reforming system that provides both primary and secondary reforming and an auxiliary heat source.
Synthesis gas containing hydrogen and carbon monoxide is used for a variety of industrial applications, for example, the production of hydrogen, chemicals and synthetic fuel production. Conventionally, the synthesis gas is produced in a fired reformer in which natural gas and steam is reformed in nickel catalyst containing reformer tubes at high temperatures (e.g., 850° C. to 1000° C.) and moderate pressures (e.g., 16 to 30 bar) to produce the synthesis gas. The endothermic heating requirements for steam methane reforming reactions occurring within the reformer tubes are provided by burners firing into the furnace that are fueled by part of the natural gas. In order to increase the hydrogen content of the synthesis gas produced by the steam methane reforming (SMR) process, the synthesis gas can be subjected to water-gas shift reactions to react residual steam in the synthesis gas with the carbon monoxide.
A well established alternative to steam methane reforming is the non-catalytic partial oxidation process (POx) whereby a sub-stoichiometric amount of oxygen is allowed to react with the natural gas feed creating steam and carbon dioxide at high temperatures. The high temperature residual methane is reformed through reactions with the high temperature steam and carbon dioxide.
An attractive alternative process for producing synthesis gas is the autothermal reforming (ATR) process which uses oxidation to produce heat with a catalyst to permit reforming to occur at lower temperatures than the POx process. Similar to the POx process, oxygen is required to partially oxidize natural gas in a burner to provide heat, high temperature carbon dioxide and steam to reform the residual methane. Some steam needs to be added to the natural gas to control carbon formation on the catalyst. However, both the ATR and POx processes require separate air separation units (ASU) to produce high-pressure oxygen, which adds complexity as well as capital and operating cost to the overall process.
When the feedstock contains significant amounts of heavy hydrocarbons, SMR and ATR processes, are typically preceded by a pre-reforming step. Pre-reforming is a catalyst based process for converting higher hydrocarbons to methane, hydrogen, carbon monoxide and carbon dioxide. The reactions involved in pre-reforming are generally endothermic. Most pre-reformers on natural gas steams operate in the endothermic area and operate adiabatically, and thus the pre-reformed feedstock leaves at a lower temperature than the feedstock entering the pre-reformer. Another process that will be discussed in this invention is the secondary reforming process, which is essentially an autothermal process that is fed the product from a steam methane reforming process. Thus, the feed to a secondary reforming process is primarily synthesis gas from steam methane reforming. Depending on the end application, some natural as may bypass the SMR process and be directly introduced into the secondary reforming step. Also, when a SMR process is followed by a secondary reforming process, the SMR may operate at a lower temperature, e.g. 650° C. to 825° C. versus 850° C. to 1000° C.
As can be appreciated, the conventional methods of producing a synthesis gas such as have been discussed above are expensive and require complex installations. To overcome the complexity and expense of such installations it has been proposed to generate the synthesis gas within reactors that utilize an oxygen transport membrane to supply oxygen and thereby generate the heat necessary to support endothermic heating requirements of the steam methane reforming reactions. A typical oxygen transport membrane has a dense layer that, while being impervious to air or other oxygen containing gas, will transport oxygen ions when subjected to an elevated operational temperature and a difference in oxygen partial pressure across the membrane.
Examples of oxygen transport membrane based reforming systems used in the production of synthesis gas can be found in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,048,472; 6,110,979; 6,114,400; 6,296,686; 7,261,751; 8,262,755; and 8,419,827. There is an operational problem with all of these oxygen transport membrane based systems because such oxygen transport membranes need to operate at high temperatures of around 900° C. to 1100° C. Where hydrocarbons such as methane and higher order hydrocarbons are subjected to such high temperatures within the oxygen transport membrane, excessive carbon formation occurs, especially at high pressures and low steam to carbon ratios. The carbon formation problems are particularly severe in the above-identified prior art oxygen transport membrane based systems. A different approach to using an oxygen transport membrane based reforming system in the production of synthesis gas is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 8,349,214 which provides a oxygen transport membrane based reforming system that uses hydrogen and carbon monoxide as part of the reactant gas feed to the oxygen transport membrane tubes and minimizes the hydrocarbon content of the feed entering the permeate side of the oxygen transport membrane tubes. Excess heat generated within the oxygen transport membrane tubes is transported mainly by radiation to the reforming tubes made of conventional materials. Use of low hydrocarbon content high hydrogen and carbon monoxide feed to the oxygen transport membrane tubes addresses many of the highlighted problems with the earlier oxygen transport membrane systems.
Other problems that arise with the prior art oxygen transport membrane based reforming systems are the cost of the oxygen transport membrane modules and the lower than desired durability, reliability and operating availability of such oxygen transport membrane based reforming systems. These problems are the primary reasons that oxygen transport membranes based reforming systems have not been successfully commercialized. Advances in oxygen transport membrane materials have addressed problems associated with oxygen flux, membrane degradation and creep life, but there is much work left to be done to achieve commercially viable oxygen transport membrane based reforming systems from a cost standpoint as well as from an operating reliability and availability standpoint.
The present invention addresses the aforementioned problems by providing an improved process for making synthesis gas using a reactively-driven oxygen transport membrane based system, which consists of two reactors that can be in the form of sets of catalyst containing tubes—reforming reactor and oxygen transport membrane reactor. Partial oxidation and some reforming occurs at the permeate (i.e. catalyst containing) side of the oxygen transport membranes and a reforming process facilitated by a reforming catalyst occurs in the reforming reactor in close proximity to the oxygen transport membrane reactor. The partial oxidation process, which is exothermic, and the reforming process, which is endothermic, both occur within the oxygen transport membrane based reforming system and thus have a high degree of thermal integration so that heat released in the oxidation process supplies the heat absorbed by the reforming process. Specifically, improvements to the reactively-driven oxygen transport membrane based system include modifications to the reactively-driven oxygen transport membrane based system to carry out both a primary reforming process in a catalyst filled reforming reactor as well as a secondary reforming process within the catalyst containing oxygen transport membrane reactor and to provide a source of auxiliary heat to balance the reforming duty between the oxygen transport membrane reactor and the auxiliary heat source.
The present invention may be characterized as a method for producing a synthesis gas in an oxygen transport membrane based reforming system, which may comprise at least two reactors that can be in the form of sets of catalyst containing tubes, including a reforming reactor and an oxygen transport membrane reactor, the method comprising the steps of: (i) reforming a hydrocarbon containing feed stream in a reforming reactor in the presence of a reforming catalyst disposed in the reforming reactor and heat to produce a reformed synthesis gas stream; (ii) feeding the reformed synthesis gas stream to a reactant side of a reactively driven and catalyst containing oxygen transport membrane reactor, wherein the oxygen transport membrane reactor includes at least one oxygen transport membrane element configured to separate oxygen from an oxygen containing stream at the oxidant side of the reactively driven and catalyst containing oxygen transport membrane reactor and transport the separated oxygen to the reactant side through oxygen ion transport when subjected to an elevated operational temperature and a difference in oxygen partial pressure across the at least one oxygen transport membrane element; (iii) reacting a portion of the reformed synthesis gas stream with oxygen permeated through the at least one oxygen transport membrane element to produce the difference in oxygen partial pressure across the at least one oxygen transport membrane element and generate reaction products and heat; and (iv) reforming unreformed hydrocarbon gas in the reformed synthesis gas stream in the presence of catalysts contained in the oxygen transport membrane reactor, the reaction products and the heat to produce a synthesis gas product stream. A first portion of the heat required for the initial or primary reforming step is provided by the reactively driven and catalyst containing oxygen transport membrane reactor and a second portion of the heat required for the primary reforming step is transferred from an auxiliary heat source disposed proximate the reforming reactor.
The invention may also be characterized as an oxygen transport membrane based reforming system comprising: (a) a reactor housing; (b) a reforming reactor disposed in the reactor housing and configured to reform a hydrocarbon containing feed stream in the presence of a reforming catalyst disposed in the reforming reactor and heat to produce a reformed synthesis gas stream; (c) a reactively driven oxygen transport membrane reactor disposed in the reactor housing proximate the reforming reactor and configured to receive the reformed synthesis gas stream and react a portion of the reformed synthesis gas stream with permeated oxygen and generate reaction products and heat, including a first portion of the heat required by the reforming reactor; and (d) an auxiliary heat source disposed in the reactor housing proximate the reforming reactor and configured to supply a second portion of the heat required by the reforming reactor to produce the reformed synthesis gas stream.
The reactively driven oxygen transport membrane reactor is further configured to reform any unreformed hydrocarbon gas in the reformed synthesis gas stream in the presence of one or more catalysts and some of the heat generated by the reaction of the reformed synthesis gas stream and permeated oxygen to produce a synthesis gas product stream. At a temperature of about 730° C. at the exit of the reforming reactor and a temperature of about 995° C. at the exit of the OTM reactor, the module of the synthesis gas product stream is between about 1.85 and 2.15 or more and is dependent on the amount of heat supplied to the reforming reactor from the auxiliary heat source. More specifically, at the specified temperatures, the module of the synthesis gas product stream rises from a minimum of about 1.85 when the percentage of heat supplied to the reforming reactor from the auxiliary heat source is less than 15% to a maximum of about 2.15 when the percentage of heat supplied to the reforming reactor from the auxiliary heat source is greater than about 85%. Put another way, at temperatures of about 730° C. and 995° C. at the exit of the reforming reactor and OTM reactor respectively, the module of the synthesis gas product stream will be between about 1.85 and 2.00 when the second portion of heat supplied to the reforming reactor from the auxiliary heat source is 50% or less of the total required heat to be supplied to the reforming reactor and between about 2.00 and 2.15 when the second portion of heat supplied to the reforming reactor from the auxiliary heat source is more than 50% of the total required heat to be supplied to the reforming reactor. As indicated above, the actual module of the synthesis gas product stream is also dependent on the reforming temperatures within the oxygen transport membrane based reforming system, and in particular, the temperature at the exit of the reforming reactor. For example, if the temperature at the exit of the reforming reactor is raised to a temperature of between 800° C. and 900° C., the range of module for the synthesis gas product stream would be expected to increase to perhaps between about 1.90 to 2.25 or more depending on the amount of heat supplied to the reforming reactor from the auxiliary heat source.
In addition to the variation of the module of the synthesis gas product stream based on the reforming duty split between the first portion of heat and the second portion of heat designed into the oxygen transport membrane based reforming system, the hydrogen to carbon monoxide ratio (H2/CO) of the synthesis gas product stream is also varied slightly between about 2.95 and 3.10 at a reforming reactor exit temperature of about 730° C. and depending on the amount of heat supplied to the reforming reactor from the auxiliary heat source. The carbon monoxide to carbon dioxide ratio (CO/CO2) of the synthesis gas product stream also varies between about 2.50 and 3.30 at an exit temperature of about 730° C. and depending on the reforming duty split between the first portion of heat and the second portion of heat.
The auxiliary heat source may be designed to provide between about 15% and 85% of the heat required for the reforming of the hydrocarbon containing feed stream. The auxiliary heat source may be in the form of one or more auxiliary oxygen transport membrane reactors or one or more ceramic burners disposed within the reactor housing and in close proximity to the reforming reactor.
While the specification concludes with claims distinctly pointing out the subject matter that applicants regard as their invention, it is believed that the invention will be better understood when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings in which:
The oxygen depleted air leaves the oxygen transport membrane reforming tubes as heated oxygen depleted retentate stream 124 at the same or slightly higher temperature than the heated air feed stream 115. Any temperature increase, typically less than about 30° C., is attributable to the portion of energy generated by oxidizing reaction of hydrogen and carbon monoxide in the oxygen transport membrane tubes and transferred by convection to the oxygen depleted retentate stream 124.
The temperature of this oxygen depleted retentate stream 124 is heated back to a temperature between about 1050° C. and 1200° C. prior to being directed to the heat exchanger or ceramic regenerator 113. This increase in temperature of the oxygen depleted retentate stream 124 is preferably accomplished by use of a duct burner 126, which facilitates combustion of a supplemental fuel stream 128 using some of the residual oxygen in the retentate stream 124 as the oxidant. Though not shown, an alternative means is to combust the supplemental fuel stream 128 with a separate air stream in duct burner 126 and then mix the hot flue gas with the oxygen depleted retentate stream 124. In the ceramic heat exchanger or regenerator 113, the heated, oxygen depleted retentate stream 124 provides the energy to raise the temperature of the incoming feed air stream 110 from ambient temperature to a temperature between about 850° C. to 1050° C. The resulting cold retentate stream exiting the ceramic heat exchanger, typically containing less than about 5% oxygen, leaves the oxygen transport membrane based reforming system 100 system as exhaust gas 131 at a temperature of around 150° C.
Although not shown in
The hydrocarbon containing feed stream 130, preferably natural gas, to be reformed is typically mixed with a small amount of hydrogen or hydrogen-rich gas 132 to form a combined hydrocarbon feed 133 and then preheated to around 370° C. in heat exchanger 134 that serves as a feed pre-heater, as described in more detail below. Since natural gas typically contains unacceptably high level of sulfur species, a small amount of hydrogen or hydrogen-rich gas 132 is added to facilitate desulfurization. Preferably, the heated feed stream 136 undergoes a sulfur removal process via device 140 such as hydro-treating to reduce the sulfur species to H2S, which is subsequently removed in a guard bed using material like ZnO and/or CuO. The hydro-treating step also saturates any alkenes present in the hydrocarbon containing feed stream. Further, since natural gas generally contains higher hydrocarbons that will break down at high temperatures to form unwanted carbon deposits that adversely impact the reforming process, the natural gas feed stream is preferably pre-reformed in an adiabatic pre-reformer, which converts higher hydrocarbons to methane, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, and carbon dioxide. Also contemplated but not shown is an embodiment where the pre-reformer is a heated pre-reformer that may be thermally coupled with oxygen transport membrane based reforming system.
Superheated steam 150 is added to the pre-treated natural gas and hydrogen feed stream 141, as required, to produce a mixed feed stream 160 with a steam to carbon ratio between about 1.0 and 2.5, and more preferably between about 1.2 and 2.2. The superheated steam 150 is preferably between about 15 bar and 80 bar and between about 300° C. and 600° C. and generated in a fired heater 170 using a source of process steam 172. As seen in
The illustrated embodiment of the oxygen transport membrane based reforming system 100 comprises three reactors (200, 210, 220) disposed in a single reactor housing 201. The first reactor is a reforming reactor 200 which comprises reforming catalyst containing tubes configured to reform the heated mixed feed stream 180 containing a hydrocarbon feed and steam in the presence of a conventional reforming catalyst disposed in the reforming tubes and heat to produce a reformed synthesis gas stream 205. The temperature of the reformed hydrogen-rich synthesis gas stream is typically designed to be between 650° C. and 850° C.
The reformed synthesis gas stream 205 is then fed as an influent to the second reactor which is an oxygen transport membrane reactor 210. More particularly, reformed synthesis gas stream 205 is fed to a reactant side of a reactively driven and catalyst containing oxygen transport membrane reactor 210. The reactively driven, oxygen transport membrane reactor 210 includes one or more oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes each having an oxidant side and a reactant side that are disposed proximate to the reforming tubes. Each of the oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes are configured to separate oxygen from the heated oxygen containing stream 115 contacting the oxidant side to the reactant side through oxygen ion transport. The oxygen ion transport occurs when the oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes are subjected to elevated operational temperatures and there is a difference in oxygen partial pressure across the oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes.
A portion of the reformed synthesis gas stream 205 fed to the reactant side of the oxygen transport membrane reactor 210 immediately reacts with oxygen permeated through the oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes to produce the difference in oxygen partial pressure across the oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes which drives the oxygen ion transport and separation. This reaction produces reaction products and heat. A portion of the heat produced by the reaction the reformed synthesis gas stream 205 and the permeated oxygen is transferred via convection to the oxygen depleted retentate stream and another portion of the heat is transferred via radiation to the reforming reactor 200.
The oxygen transport membrane reactor 210 is further configured to reform unreformed hydrocarbon gas in the reformed synthesis gas stream 205 and produce a synthesis gas product stream 215. This secondary reforming occurs in the presence of one or more reforming catalysts contained in the oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes, reaction products (e.g. from the reaction of a portion of the reformed synthesis gas stream 205 and oxygen permeate) and the third portion of the energy or heat produced by the same reaction. The synthesis gas product stream 215 leaving the oxygen transport membrane reactor 210 is preferably at a temperature between about 900° C. and 1050° C.
The third reactor in the illustrated embodiment is an auxiliary oxygen transport membrane reactor 220 that is configured to provide an auxiliary source of radiant heat to the reforming reactor 200. This auxiliary reactor 220 or heat source preferably provides between about 15% and 85% of the heat required for the initial reforming of the heated mixed feed stream 180 that occurs in the reforming reactor 200. The auxiliary oxygen transport membrane reactor 220 is also a reactively driven oxygen transport membrane reactor 220 that comprises a plurality of oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes disposed proximate to or in a juxtaposed orientation with respect to the reforming reactor 200. The auxiliary oxygen transport membrane reactor 220 is configured to also separate or permeate oxygen from the oxygen containing stream 115 contacting the oxidant side of the oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes to the reactant side of the oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes through oxygen ion transport. The permeated oxygen reacts with a low pressure hydrogen containing stream 222, preferably less than about 3 bar, that is fed via a valve 221 to the reactant side of the oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes to produce the difference in oxygen partial pressure across the oxygen transport membrane element and to produce an auxiliary reaction product stream 225 and heat.
In the illustrated embodiment, the low pressure hydrogen containing stream 222 is a hydrogen and light hydrocarbon containing stream that preferably includes a recirculated portion 226 of the synthesis gas product stream and optionally a supplementary fuel 224. A portion of the reaction product stream 225 exiting the reactant side of the oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes of the oxygen transport membrane reactor 220 is an off-gas 227 that may be mixed with a supplementary natural gas fuel 228 to the duct burner 126. Another portion of the reaction product stream 225 exiting the reactant side of the oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes is an off-gas 229 that may be mixed with a supplementary natural gas fuel 174 to fired heater 170.
Preferably, the reforming reactor 200 and the oxygen transport membrane reactor 210 are arranged as sets of closely packed tubes in close proximity to one another. The reforming reactor 200 generally consists of reforming tubes. Oxygen transport membrane reactor 210 as well as the auxiliary oxygen transport membrane reactor 220 comprise a plurality of ceramic oxygen transport membrane tubes. The oxygen transport membrane tubes are preferably configured as multilayered ceramic tubes capable of conducting oxygen ions at an elevated operational temperature, wherein the oxidant side of the oxygen transport membrane tubes is the exterior surface of the ceramic tubes exposed to the heated oxygen containing stream and the reactant side or permeate side is the interior surface of the ceramic tubes. Within each of the oxygen transport membrane tubes are one or more catalysts that facilitate partial oxidation and/or reforming, as applicable. Although only three of the reforming tubes are illustrated in
The oxygen transport membrane elements or tubes used in the embodiments disclosed herein preferably comprise a composite structure that incorporates a dense layer, a porous support and an intermediate porous layer located between the dense layer and the porous support. Each of the dense layer and the intermediate porous layer are capable of conducting oxygen ions and electrons at elevated operational temperatures to separate the oxygen from the incoming air stream. The porous support layer would thus form the reactant side or permeate side. The dense layer and the intermediate porous layer preferably comprise a mixture of an ionic conductive material and an electrically conductive material to conduct oxygen ions and electrons, respectively. The intermediate porous layer preferably has a lower permeability and a smaller average pore size than the porous support layer to distribute the oxygen separated by the dense layer towards the porous support layer. The preferred oxygen transport membrane tubes also include a mixed phase oxygen ion conducting dense ceramic separation layer comprising a mixture of a zirconia based oxygen ion conducting phase and a predominantly electronic conducting perovskite phase. This thin, dense separation layer is implemented on the thicker inert, porous support.
Oxidation catalyst particles or a solution containing precursors of the oxidation catalyst particles are optionally located in the intermediate porous layer and/or in the thicker inert, porous support adjacent to the intermediate porous layer. The oxidation catalyst particles contain an oxidation catalyst, such as gadolinium doped ceria, are selected to promote oxidation of the partially reformed synthesis gas stream in the presence of the permeated oxygen when introduced into the pores of the porous support, on a side thereof opposite to the intermediate porous layer.
The endothermic heating requirements of the reforming process occurring in the reforming reactor 200 is supplied through radiation of some of the heat from the oxygen transport membrane reactor 210 and auxiliary oxygen transport membrane reactor 220 together with the convective heat transfer provided by heated oxygen depleted retentate stream. Sufficient thermal coupling or heat transfer between the heat-releasing ceramic oxygen transport membrane tubes and the heat-absorbing catalyst containing reformer tubes must be enabled within the design of the present reforming system. A portion of the heat transfer between the ceramic oxygen transport membrane tubes and the adjacent or juxtaposed reforming catalyst containing reformer tubes is through the radiation mode of heat transfer whereby surface area, surface view factor, surface emissivity, and non-linear temperature difference between the tubes (e.g., Totm4−Treformer4) are critical elements to achieve the desired thermal coupling. Surface emissivity and temperatures are generally dictated by tube material and reaction requirements. The surface area and surface view factor are generally dictated by tube arrangement or configuration within each module and the entire reactor. While there are numerous tube arrangements or configurations that could meet the thermal coupling requirements between the oxygen transport membrane tubes and the reformer tubes, a key challenge is to achieve a relatively high production rate per unit volume which, in turn, depends on the amount of active oxygen transport membrane area contained within the unit volume. An additional challenge to achieving the optimum thermal coupling performance is to optimize the size of the ceramic oxygen transport membrane tubes and the catalyst containing reformer tubes, and more particular the effective surface area ratio, Areformer/Aotm, of the respective tubes. Of course, such performance optimization must be balanced against the manufacturability requirements, costs, as well as the reliability, maintainability, operating availability of the modules and reactor.
Advantageously, it has been found that the module of the synthesis gas product stream produced from the disclosed embodiments of the oxygen transport membrane based reforming system varies depending on the exit stream temperatures and the amount of heat supplied to the reforming reactor from the auxiliary heat source. For example, as depicted in
The actual module, H2/CO ratio and CO/CO2 ratio of the synthesis gas product stream is very much dependent on the exit temperatures realized within the oxygen transport membrane based reforming system. The graphs of
As indicated above, the auxiliary heat source is configured, or more preferably designed, to provide between about 15% and 85% of the total heat required for the primary reforming of the hydrocarbon containing feed stream in the reforming reactor. The auxiliary heat source may be an auxiliary oxygen transport membrane reactor as shown in
As a result, it is possible to design and/or tailor the present oxygen transport membrane based reforming system to produce a synthesis gas having desired characteristics by simply adjusting or modifying the heat duty split between oxygen transport membrane reactor and the auxiliary heat source as well as the exit temperatures. The desired or targeted synthesis gas characteristics will depend of course on the application of the synthesis gas and other system variables, such as stream exit temperatures, methane slip, reactor pressures, etc.
Turning again to
To minimize metal dusting issues, the hot synthesis gas product stream 215, preferably at a temperature between about 900° C. and 1050° C. is cooled to a temperature of about 400° C. or less in a Process Gas (PG) Boiler 252. The initially cooled synthesis gas product stream 254 is then used to preheat the mixture of natural gas and hydrogen feed stream 133 in a feed pre-heater 134 and subsequently to preheat boiler feed water 255 in the economizer 256 and to heat the feed water stream 259. In the illustrated embodiment, the boiler feed water stream 255 is preferably pumped using a feed water pump (not shown), heated in economizer 256 and sent to steam drum 257 while the heated feed water stream is sent to a de-aerator (not shown) that provides boiler feed water 255. Synthesis gas leaving the feed water heater 258 is preferably around 150° C. It is cooled down to about 40° C. using a fin-fan cooler 261 and a synthesis gas cooler 264 fed by cooling water 266. The cooled synthesis gas 270 then enters a knock-out drum 268 where water is removed from the bottoms as process condensate stream 271 which, although not shown, is recycled for use as feed water, and the cooled synthesis gas 272 is recovered overhead.
The final synthesis gas product 276 is obtained from the compression of the cooled synthesis gas stream 273 in a synthesis gas compressor 274. Depending on the application, multiple stages of compression may be required. The inter-stage cooling and condensate knock out is not shown in
CO+2H2→CH3OH
CO2+3H2→CH3OH+H2O
The heat generated in the methanol synthesis reaction is used for steam production and/or for preheating of the synthesis gas feed. Temperature at the outlet of the methanol reactor is typically between about 200° C. and about 260° C. This methanol synthesis stream 324 is cooled down to about 38° C. in heat exchanger 322 and cooler 332 before entering a separator 334 where the crude methanol stream 340 containing mostly methanol, water and trace amounts of other species (e.g. dimethyl ether, ethanol and higher alcohols), is separated in the bottoms and sent to further distillation steps for final purification. Most of the overhead stream 336 from the separator 334 is a methanol loop recycle stream 344 sent back to the methanol synthesis reactor 330 via recycle compressor 345 to increase the carbon conversion to methanol. The recycle compressor 345 is required to compensate for pressure drop across the methanol synthesis reactor 330 and associated equipment, e.g. heat exchangers and coolers.
A small portion of the overhead stream 336, typically between about 1% and 5% is purged from the methanol synthesis loop 300 to prevent buildup of inerts in the methanol synthesis loop 300. The typical composition of the purge stream 350 is as follows: 75% hydrogen, 3% carbon dioxide, 12% carbon dioxide, 3% nitrogen, and 7% methane, with a higher heating value of about 325 BTU/scf. The methanol loop purge stream 350 is then split into two streams, namely methanol purge stream 350A which is directed back to the auxiliary oxygen transport membrane reactor 220 as the hydrogen containing feed and methanol purge stream 350B which forms the hydrogen-rich gas that is combined with the hydrocarbon containing feed stream to form a combined hydrocarbon feed 133. In the illustrated embodiment, the low pressure hydrogen containing stream 222 is a mixture of a portion of the methanol purge stream 350A and a supplemental natural gas fuel stream 224.
The main difference between the embodiment shown in
Although not shown in
Another difference between the embodiments shown in
While the present invention has been characterized in various ways and described in relation to preferred embodiments, as will occur to those skilled in the art, numerous, additions, changes and modifications thereto can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention as set forth in the appended claims.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of U.S. provisional patent application Ser. Nos. 61/816,326 filed on Apr. 26, 2013; 61/874,077 filed on Sep. 5, 2013; and 61/910,697 filed on Dec. 2, 2013 and U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/261,781 filed Apr. 25, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,212,113, the disclosures of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2593507 | Wainer | Apr 1952 | A |
2692760 | Flurschutz | Oct 1954 | A |
3282803 | Poepel et al. | Nov 1966 | A |
3317298 | Klomp et al. | May 1967 | A |
3468647 | Buyers et al. | Sep 1969 | A |
3770621 | Collins et al. | Nov 1973 | A |
3861723 | Kunz et al. | Jan 1975 | A |
3868817 | Marion et al. | Mar 1975 | A |
3930814 | Gessner | Jan 1976 | A |
3976451 | Blackmer et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4013592 | Matsuoka et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4128776 | Boquist et al. | Dec 1978 | A |
4153426 | Wintrell | May 1979 | A |
4162993 | Retalick | Jul 1979 | A |
4175153 | Dobo et al. | Nov 1979 | A |
4183539 | French et al. | Jan 1980 | A |
4206803 | Finnemore et al. | Jun 1980 | A |
4261167 | Paull et al. | Apr 1981 | A |
4292209 | Marchant et al. | Sep 1981 | A |
4350617 | Retalick et al. | Sep 1982 | A |
4357025 | Eckart | Nov 1982 | A |
4365021 | Pirooz | Dec 1982 | A |
4373575 | Hayes | Feb 1983 | A |
4402871 | Retalick | Sep 1983 | A |
4609383 | Bonaventura et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4631238 | Ruka | Dec 1986 | A |
4650814 | Keller | Mar 1987 | A |
4651809 | Gollnick et al. | Mar 1987 | A |
4720969 | Jackman | Jan 1988 | A |
4734273 | Haskell | Mar 1988 | A |
4749632 | Flandermeyer et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4783085 | Wicks et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4791079 | Hazbun | Dec 1988 | A |
4862949 | Bell, III | Sep 1989 | A |
4866013 | Anseau et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5021137 | Joshi et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5035726 | Chen et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5061297 | Krasberg | Oct 1991 | A |
5143751 | Richard et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5169506 | Michaels | Dec 1992 | A |
5169811 | Cipollini et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5171646 | Rohr | Dec 1992 | A |
5185301 | Li et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5205990 | Lawless | Apr 1993 | A |
5240480 | Thorogood et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5259444 | Wilson | Nov 1993 | A |
5286686 | Haig et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5298469 | Haig et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5302258 | Renlund et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5306411 | Mazanec et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5342705 | Minh et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5356730 | Minh et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5417101 | Weich | May 1995 | A |
5432705 | Severt et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
5454923 | Nachlas et al. | Oct 1995 | A |
5478444 | Liu et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5534471 | Carolan et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5547494 | Prasad et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5569633 | Carolan et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5599509 | Toyao et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5643355 | Phillips et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649517 | Poola et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5707911 | Rakhimov et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5750279 | Carolan et al. | May 1998 | A |
5804155 | Farrauto et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5820654 | Gottzman et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5820655 | Gottzmann et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5837125 | Prasad et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5855762 | Phillips et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5864576 | Nakatani et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5902379 | Phillips et al. | May 1999 | A |
5927103 | Howard | Jul 1999 | A |
5932141 | Rostrop-Nielsen et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5944874 | Prasad et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5964922 | Keskar et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5975130 | Ligh et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5980840 | Kleefisch et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6010614 | Keskar et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6035662 | Howard et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6048472 | Nataraj | Apr 2000 | A |
6051125 | Pham et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6070471 | Westphal et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077323 | Nataraj et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6110979 | Nataraj et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6113673 | Loutfy et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6114400 | Nataraj | Sep 2000 | A |
6139810 | Gottzmann et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6153163 | Prasad | Nov 2000 | A |
6191573 | Noda | Feb 2001 | B1 |
RE37134 | Wilson | Apr 2001 | E |
6214066 | Nataraj | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6214314 | Nataraj et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6268075 | Autenrieth | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6290757 | Lawless | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293084 | Drnevich et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293978 | Kleefisch et al. | Sep 2001 | B2 |
6296686 | Prasad | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6333015 | Lewis | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6352624 | Crome et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6355093 | Schwartz et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6360524 | Drnevich et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6368491 | Cao et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6382958 | Bool, III et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6394043 | Bool, III et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6402156 | Schutz et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6402988 | Gottzmann et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6430966 | Meinhardt et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6468328 | Sircar et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6475657 | Del-Gallo et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6492290 | Dyer et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6532769 | Meinhardt et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6537514 | Prasad et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6562104 | Bool, III | May 2003 | B2 |
6592731 | Lawless | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6638575 | Chen et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6641626 | Van Calcar et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6652626 | Plee | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6681589 | Brudnicki | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6695983 | Prasad et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6783750 | Shah et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6786952 | Risdal et al. | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6811904 | Gorte et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6846511 | Visco et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6916570 | Vaughey et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
7077133 | Yagi et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7125528 | Besecker et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7153559 | Ito et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7179323 | Stein et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7229537 | Chen et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7261751 | Dutta et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7279244 | Morishima | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7320778 | Whittenberger | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7351488 | Visco et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7374601 | Bonchonsky et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7396442 | Bagby et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7427368 | Drnevich | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7470811 | Thiebaut | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7510594 | Wynn et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7534519 | Cable et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7556676 | Nagabhushana et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7588626 | Gopalan et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7658788 | Holmes et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7704070 | Veenstra | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7786180 | Fitzpatrick | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7833314 | Lane et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7846236 | Del-Gallo et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7856829 | Shah et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7871579 | Tentarelli | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7901837 | Jacobson et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7906079 | Whittenberger et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7968208 | Hodgson | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8070922 | Nelson et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8128988 | Yasumoto et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8196387 | Shah et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8201852 | Linhorst et al. | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8262755 | Repasky et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8323378 | Swami et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8323463 | Christie et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8349214 | Kelly | Jan 2013 | B1 |
8419827 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8435332 | Christie et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8455382 | Carolan et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
8658328 | Suda et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8722010 | Grover | May 2014 | B1 |
8795417 | Christie et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8894944 | Larsen et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
9023245 | Chakravarti et al. | May 2015 | B2 |
9115045 | Chakravarti et al. | Aug 2015 | B2 |
9212113 | Chakravarti et al. | Dec 2015 | B2 |
9296671 | Stuckert et al. | Mar 2016 | B2 |
9365422 | Chakravarti | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9365466 | Chakravarti et al. | Jun 2016 | B2 |
9452401 | Kelly | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9453644 | Kromer et al. | Sep 2016 | B2 |
9556027 | Chakravarti | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9611144 | Chakravarti | Apr 2017 | B2 |
20020073938 | Bool et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020078906 | Prasad et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020141920 | Alvin et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020155061 | Prasad et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030039601 | Halvorson | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039608 | Shah et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030054154 | Chen et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030068260 | Wellington | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030230196 | Kim | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040042944 | Sehlin et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040043272 | Gorte | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040065541 | Sehlin | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040089973 | Hoang | May 2004 | A1 |
20040135324 | Brule et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040221722 | Prasad et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050037299 | Gottzmann | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058871 | Li et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050061663 | Chen et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050137810 | Esposito, Jr. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050214612 | Visco et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050248098 | Sisk et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050263405 | Jacobson et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060019827 | Whittenberger | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060029539 | Dutta et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060054301 | McRay et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062707 | Crome et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060063659 | Xue et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060127656 | Gallo et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060127749 | Christie et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060191408 | Gopalan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060236719 | Lane et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070004809 | Lattner et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070029342 | Cross et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070039466 | Nawata et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070041894 | Drnevich | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070065687 | Kelly et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070082254 | Hiwatashi | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070104793 | Akash | May 2007 | A1 |
20070122667 | Kelley | May 2007 | A1 |
20070137478 | Stein et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070158329 | Cao | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070163889 | Kato et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070212271 | Kennedy | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070245897 | Besecker et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070289215 | Hemmings | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070292342 | Hemmings et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20070292742 | Ball et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080000350 | Mundschau et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080000353 | Rarig et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080006532 | Mukundan et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080023338 | Stoots et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080029388 | Elangovan et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080047431 | Nagabhushana | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080141672 | Shah et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080142148 | Nielsen et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080168901 | Carolan et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080169449 | Mundschau | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080226544 | Nakamura | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080302013 | Repasky et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090001727 | De Koeijer et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090018373 | Werth et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090023050 | Finnerty et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029040 | Christie et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090031895 | Del-Gallo et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090084035 | Wei | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090107046 | Leininger | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090120379 | Bozzuto et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090220837 | Osada | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090272266 | Werth et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100015014 | Gopalan et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100018394 | Ekiner et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100074828 | Singh | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076280 | Bernstein et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100116133 | Reed et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100116680 | Reed et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100122552 | Schwartz | May 2010 | A1 |
20100143824 | Tucker et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100178219 | Verykios et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100178238 | Takamura et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100193104 | Ryu et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100200418 | Licht | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100203238 | Magno et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100266466 | Froehlich et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100276119 | Doty | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100313762 | Roeck et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110020192 | Baumann et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110067405 | Armstrong et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110070509 | Mai | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110076213 | Carolan et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110111320 | Suda et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110120127 | Lippmann et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110132367 | Patel | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110141672 | Farley et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110142722 | Hemmings et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110143255 | Jain et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110180399 | Christie et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110200520 | Ramkumar | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110240924 | Repasky | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110253551 | Lane et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20120000360 | Richet et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120067060 | Greeff | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120067210 | Sane et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120194783 | Palamara et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120288439 | Sundaram et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20120294783 | Palamara et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130009100 | Kelly et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130009102 | Kelly | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130015405 | Quintero | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130072374 | Lane et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130072375 | Lane et al. | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130156958 | Belov et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130258000 | Ohashi et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20140044604 | Lane et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140056774 | Kelly et al. | Feb 2014 | A1 |
20140060643 | Martin et al. | Mar 2014 | A1 |
20140183866 | Kromer et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140206779 | Lackner | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20140231351 | Wickramasinghe et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140319424 | Chakravarti et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319425 | Chakravarti | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319426 | Chakravarti | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140319427 | Chakravarti | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140323597 | Stuckert et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140323598 | Chakravarti et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20140323599 | Chakravarti et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150096506 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150098872 | Kelly et al. | Apr 2015 | A1 |
20150132485 | Garing et al. | May 2015 | A1 |
20150226118 | Kelly et al. | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20150328582 | Joo et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160001221 | Lu et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160118188 | Wada | Apr 2016 | A1 |
20160155570 | Shimada et al. | Jun 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10330859 | Feb 2004 | DE |
102004038435 | Feb 2006 | DE |
0 663 231 | Jul 1995 | EP |
0 926 096 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0926096 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0 984 500 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0 989 093 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0984500 | Mar 2000 | EP |
0989093 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1 459 800 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 504 811 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1504811 | Feb 2005 | EP |
1717420 | Nov 2006 | EP |
1743694 | Jan 2007 | EP |
1930076 | Jun 2008 | EP |
2 098 491 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2098491 | Sep 2009 | EP |
2873451 | May 2015 | EP |
688657 | Mar 1953 | GB |
689522 | Apr 1953 | GB |
697377 | Sep 1953 | GB |
713553 | Nov 1954 | GB |
1199483 | Jul 1970 | GB |
1 312 700 | Apr 1973 | GB |
1312700 | Apr 1973 | GB |
1348375 | Mar 1974 | GB |
2016298 | Sep 1979 | GB |
56-136605 | Oct 1981 | JP |
WO 9741060 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 2011020192 | Nov 1997 | WO |
WO 9842636 | Oct 1998 | WO |
WO 0017418 | Mar 2000 | WO |
WO 0109059 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO 2004063110 | Jul 2004 | WO |
WO 2006064160 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2007060141 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007060141 | May 2007 | WO |
WO 2007086949 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007092844 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2007086949 | Aug 2007 | WO |
WO 2008024405 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2008024405 | Feb 2008 | WO |
WO 2009027099 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO 2010052641 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2010052641 | May 2010 | WO |
WO 2011020192 | Feb 2011 | WO |
WO 2011083333 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2011083333 | Jul 2011 | WO |
WO 2011121095 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO 2011121095 | Oct 2011 | WO |
WO 2012067505 | May 2012 | WO |
WO 2012118730 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2012118730 | Sep 2012 | WO |
WO 2013009560 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2013009560 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO 2013062413 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013089895 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2013089895 | Jun 2013 | WO |
WO 2014049119 | Apr 2014 | WO |
WO 2014074559 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014077531 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014074559 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014077531 | May 2014 | WO |
WO 2014107707 | Jul 2014 | WO |
WO 2014160948 | Oct 2014 | WO |
WO 2014176022 | Oct 2014 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Zhu et al.; Development of Interconnect Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells; Materials Science and Engineering A348, Apr. 23, 2002, pp. 227-243. |
F. Bidrawn et al., “Efficient Reduction of CO2 in a Solid Oxide Electrolyzer” Electrochemical and Solid State Letters, vol. 11, No. 9, Jun. 20, 2008, pp. B167-B170, XP002644615. |
Joseph J. Beaman, D.Sc.; “Oxygen Storage on Zeolites”; Prepared by USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Human Systems Divisions (AFSC), Brooks Air Force Base, TX 78235-5301; USAFSAM-TR-88-26; AD-A209 352; pp. 1-77; Jan. 1989. |
Zhimin Zhong, “Stoichiometric lanthanum chromite based ceramic interconnects with low sintering temperature”, Solid State of Ionics, North Holland Pub. Company, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 177, No. 7-8, Mar. 15, 2006, pp. 757-764, XP027895768,ISSN: 0167-2738. |
Okawa et al., Trial Design of a CO2 Recovery Power Plant by Burning Pulverized Coal in O2/CO2, Energy Convers. Mgmt., vol. 38, Supplement (1997) pp. S123-S127. |
Lee Rosen, Nick Degenstein; Minish Shah; Jamie Wilson; Sean Kelly; John Peck; and Max Christie; “Development of Oxygen Transport Membranes for Coal-Based Power Generation”; ScienceDirect (Available online at www.sciencedirect.com); Energy Procedia 4 (2011) pp. 750-755. |
M. Solvang, K.A. Nielsen, and P.H. Larsen, “Optimization of Glass Ceramic Sealant for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells”, Jan. 1, 2005, XP055352985, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://ma.ecsdl.org/content/MA2005-01/30/1206.full.pdf on Mar. 8, 2017. |
Jian-jun Liu, Tong Liu, Wen-dong Wang, Jian-feng Gao, Chu-sheng Chen; Zr0.84Y0.16O1.92-La0.8Sr0.2Cr0.5Fe0.5O3-8 dual-phase composite hollow fiber membrane targeting chemical reactor applications; Journal of Membrane Science 389 (2012) 435-440. |
Switzer et al., “Cost and Feasibility Study on the Praxair Advanced Boiler for the CO2 Capture Project's Refinery Scenario”, Carbon Dioxide Capture for Deep Geologic Formations, vol. 1, D.C. Thomas and S.M. Benson (Eds.), Copyright 2005 Published by Elsevier Ltd., Chapter 32, pp. 561-579. |
David Studer; Demonstration of a cylinder fill system based on solid electrolyte oxygen separator (SEOS) technology: Early field assessment at a USAF maintenance facility, (Air Products & Chemicals Inc.); AFRL-RH-BR-TR-2010-0046; Jun. 2010. |
Zhu et al.; “Development of Interconnect Materials for Solid Oxide Fuel Cells”; Materials Science and Engineering A348, Apr. 23, 2002, pp. 227-243. |
Lee Rosen et al.; “Development of Oxygen Transport Membranes for Coal-Based Power Generation”; ScienceDirect (Available online at www.sciencedirect.com); Energy Procedia 4 (2011) pp. 750-755. |
F. Bidrawn et al., “Efficient Reduction of CO2 in a Solid Oxide Electrolyzer” Electrochemical and Solid State Letters, vol. 11, No. 9, Jun. 20, 2008, pp. B167-B170, XP002644615, col. 1, 2. |
Ebbesen et al., “Electrolysis of carbon dioxide in Solid Oxide Electrolysis Cells”, Journal of Power Sources, Elsevier SA, CH, vol. 193, No. 1, Aug. 1, 2009, pp. 349-358, XP026150424, ISSN: 0378-7753, DOI: 10.1016/J. JPOWSOUR. 2009. 02. 093. |
The U.S. Department of Energy, “Evaluation of Fossil Fuel Power Plants with CO2 Recovery”, Final Report (Feb. 2002). |
The U.S. Department of Energy—Office of Fossil Energy and U.S. Department of Energy/NETL, “Evaluation of Innovative Fossil Fuel Power Plants with CO2 Removal”, Interim Report (Dec. 2000). |
Sylvain Deville; “Freeze-Casting of Porous Ceramics: A Review of Current Achievements and Issues”; Advanced Engineering Materials 2008, 10, No. 3, pp. 155-169. |
Neville Holt, “Gasification Process Selection—Trade-offs and Ironies”, Presented at the Gasification Technologies Conference 2004, Oct. 3-6, 2004 JW Marriott Hotel, Washington, DC, pp. 1-10. |
Friedemann Marschner et al., “Gas Production”, Ullmann's Encyclopedia of Industrial Chemistry, Jun. 15, 2000, pp. 1-21, XP002253967. |
Dyer et al., “Ion Transport Membrane Technology for Oxygen Separation and Syngas Production”, Solid State Ionics 134 (2000) p. 21-33. |
Andrea Montebelli et al., “Methods for the catalytic activation of metallic structured substrates”, Catalysis Science & Technology, 2014, pp. 2846-2870. |
Joseph J. Beaman, D.Sc.; “Oxygen Storage on Zeolites”; Prepared by USAF School of Aerospace Medicine, Human Systems Divisions (AFSC), Brooks Air Force Base, TX 78235-5301; USAFSAM-TR-88-26; AS-A209 352; pp. 1-77; Jan. 1989. |
Radtke et al., “Renaissance of Gasification based on Cutting Edge Technologies”, VGB PowerTech (2005), XP-001235150, pp. 106-115. |
L. N. Protasova et al., “Review of Patent Publications from 1990 to 2010 on Catalytic Coatings on Different Substrates, Including Microstructured Channels: Preparation, Deposition Techniques, Applications”, Recent Patents on Chemical Engineering, 2012, pp. 28-44. |
Zhimin Zhong, “Stoichiometric lanthanum chromite based ceramic interconnects with low sintering temperature”, Solid State of Ionics, North Holland Pub. Company, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 177 No. 7-8, Mar. 15, 2006, pp. 757-764, XP027895768,ISSN: 0167-2738. |
Babcock & Wilcox, Steam 40, “Sulfur Dioxide Control” (1992), pp. 35-1-35-15. |
M.F. Lu et al., Thermomechanical transport and anodic properties of perovskite-type (LaSr) CrFeO, Journal of Power Sources, Elsevier SA, CH, vol. 206, Jan. 15, 2012, pp. 59-69, XP028403091. |
Okawa et al., Trial Design for a CO2 Recovery Power Plant by Burning Pulverized Coal in O2/CO2 , Energy Conyers. Mgmt., vol. 38, Supplement (1997) pp. S123-S127. |
Ciacchi et al., “Tubular zirconia-yttria electrolyte membrane technology for oxygen separation”, Solid State Ionics 152-153, 2002, pp. 763-768. |
M. Solvang et al., “Optimization of Glass Ceramic Sealant for Intermediate Temperature Solid Oxide Fuel Cells”, Jan. 1, 2005, XP055352985, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://ma.ecsdl.org/content/MA2005-01/30/1206.full.pdf (retrieved on Mar. 8, 2017). |
VDM Crofer et al., “Material Data Sheet No. 4046 May 2010 Edition”, Jan. 1, 2010, XP055353076, Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://www.vdm-metals.com/fileadmin/user_upload/Downloads/Data_Sheets/Data_Sheet_VDM_Crofer_22_APU.pdf retrieved on Mar. 9, 2017. |
Yulia Hilli, et al.; “Sulfur adsorption and release properties of bimetallic Pd-Ni supported catalysts”; Journal of Molecular Catalysis A: Chemical, vol. 48, Jul. 28, 2015, pp. 161-171, XP029261263. |
Magali Ferrandon, et al.; “Bimetallic Ni-Rh catalysts with low amounts of Rh for the steam and autothermal reforming of η-butane for fuel cell applications”; Applied Catalysis A: General, Elsevier, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 379, No. 1-2, May 15, 2010, pp. 121-128, XP027013168. |
M. Boaro, et al.; “Comparison between Ni-Rh/gadolinia doped ceria catalysts in reforming of propane for anode implementations in intermediate solid oxide fuel cells”; Journal of Power Sources, Elsevier SA, CH, vol. 195, No. 2, Jan. 15, 2010, pp. 649-661, XP026640152. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160060109 A1 | Mar 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61816326 | Apr 2013 | US | |
61874077 | Sep 2013 | US | |
61910697 | Dec 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14261781 | Apr 2014 | US |
Child | 14936194 | US |