1. Field of the Invention
The invention relates to communications systems in general and, more specifically, the invention relates to a multi-functional user interface and related encoding techniques for use in an interactive multimedia information delivery system.
2. Description of the Background Art
Over the past few years, the television industry has seen a transformation in a variety of techniques by which its programming is distributed to consumers. Cable television systems are doubling or even tripling system bandwidth with the migration to hybrid fiber coax (HFC) cable transmission systems. Customers unwilling to subscribe to local cable systems have switched in high numbers to direct broadcast satellite (DBS) systems. And, a variety of other approaches have been attempted focusing primarily on high bandwidth digital technologies, intelligent two way set top boxes, or other methods of attempting to offer service differentiated from standard cable and over the air broadcast systems.
With this increase in bandwidth, the number of programming choices has also increased. Leveraging off the availability of more intelligent set top boxes, several companies have developed elaborate systems for providing an interactive listing of a vast array of channel offerings, expanded textual information about individual programs, the ability to look forward to plan television viewing as much as several weeks in advance, and the option of automatically programming a video cassette recorder (VCR) to record a future broadcast of a television program.
Unfortunately, the existing program guides have several drawbacks. They tend to require a significant amount of memory, some of them needing upwards of one megabyte of memory at the set top terminal (STT). They are very slow to acquire their current database of programming information when they are turned on for the first time or are subsequently restarted (e.g., a large database may be downloaded to a STT using only a vertical blanking interval (VBI) data insertion technique). Disadvantageously, such slow database acquisition may result in out-of-date database information or, in the case of a pay-per-view (PPV) or video-on-demand (VOD) system, limited scheduling flexibility for the information provider.
In addition, existing program guides with point-to-point delivery mechanisms suffer linear decay in response time with respect to the number of subscribers served. The response time starts in the sub-second range with a handful of subscribers but seems to quickly exceed 3 seconds as the number of subscribers extends into the low thousands (2 to 4 thousand).
Another point of concern is the still-based, banner and audio (radio-style) advertisements (ads) in current program guides. These ads require different production and delivery methods from standard cable advertising practice. This practically precludes the operator from directly capitalizing on this capability due to the costs of maintaining a distinct and separate infrastructure to support the required methods. And, the value of still-based and banner ads is far less than full motion ads.
Existing program guides generally have only a single video content to be shared among many guide pages. Features such as multiple different video content, such as picture-in-picture (PIP), are not supported in existing program guides on single tuner set top boxes. Within this context, PIP refers to user interface screen that may carry one or more different video content. Existing program guides lack support for fully functional electronic commerce and video on-demand application interfaces. For integration with future applications, an extensible interactive system is required with its ability to integrate with multiple sources of full-motion video and play them interchangeably from a single tuner in the set top box, to open up a world of possible applications in the areas of interactive shopping, internet-enhanced television and other real-time information services.
Therefore, it is desirable to provide an efficient interactive multimedia delivery system which provides encoding, multiplexing, demultiplexing to enable multiple video streams within a program guide and to support electronic commerce and other applications with a multi-functional user interface.
The present invention overcomes the above-described problems and drawbacks relating to existing technology by including additional slice-based encoding, multiplexing, and demultiplexing methods of program guides and user interfaces. This invention enables program guides that include multiple video streams for picture-in-picture and other applications. In addition, this invention enables user interfaces which are multi-functional and may be used for electronic commerce and other applications.
A method for encoding a program guide in accordance with this invention includes: encoding a first set of slices for each of a plurality of graphics pages; and encoding a second set of slices for each of a plurality of video streams. Similarly, a bitstream for representing a program guide in accordance with this invention includes: a first set of packets including a set of slices for each of a plurality of graphics pages; and a second set of packets including a set of slices for each of a plurality of video streams.
The teachings of the present invention can be readily understood by considering the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, in which:
To facilitate understanding, identical reference numerals have been used, where possible, to designate identical elements that are common to the figures.
This invention is a system for generating, distributing and receiving a transport stream containing compressed video and graphics information. The invention is illustratively used to encode a plurality of interactive program guides (IPGs) that enable a user to interactively review, preview and select programming for a television system.
The invention uses compression techniques to reduce the amount of data to be transmitted and increase the speed of transmitting program guide information. As such, the data to be transmitted is compressed so that the available transmission bandwidth is used more efficiently. To transmit an IPG having both graphics and video, the invention separately encodes the graphics from the video such that the encoder associated with each portion of the IPG can be optimized to best encode the associated portion. The invention illustratively uses a slice-based, predictive encoding process that is based upon the Moving Pictures Experts Group (MPEG) standard known as MPEG-2. MPEG-2 is specified in the ISO/IEC standards 13818, which is incorporated herein by reference.
The above-referenced standard describes data processing and manipulation techniques that are well suited to the compression and delivery of video, audio and other information using fixed or variable rate digital communications systems. In particular, the above-referenced standard, and other “MPEG-like” standards and techniques, compress, illustratively, video information using intra-frame coding techniques (such as run-length coding, Huffman coding and the like) and inter-frame coding techniques (such as forward and backward predictive coding, motion compensation and the like). Specifically, in the case of video processing systems, MPEG and MPEG-like video processing systems are characterized by prediction-based compression encoding of video frames with or without intra- and/or inter-frame motion compensation encoding.
To enhance error recovery, the MPEG-2 standard contemplates the use of a “slice layer” where a video frame is divided into one or more slices. A slice contains one or more contiguous sequence of macroblocks. The sequence begins and ends at any macroblock boundary within the frame. An MPEG-2 decoder, when provided a corrupted bitstream, uses the slice layer to avoid reproducing a completely corrupted frame. For example, if a corrupted bitstream is decoded and the decoder determines that the present slice is corrupted, the decoder skips to the next slice and begins decoding. As such, only a portion of the reproduced picture is corrupted.
The present invention uses the slice layer for the main purpose of flexible encoding and compression efficiency in a head end centric end-to-end system. A slice-based encoding system enables the graphics and video of an IPG to be efficiently coded and flexibly transmitted as described below. Consequently, a user can easily and rapidly move from one IPG page to another IPG page.
The present invention can be employed for compressing and transmitting various types of video frame sequences that contain graphics and video information, and is particularly useful in compressing and transmitting interactive program guides (IPG) where a portion of the IPG contains video (referred to herein as the video portion) and a portion of the IPG contains a programming guide grid (referred to herein as the guide portion or graphics portion). The present invention slice-based encodes the guide portion separately from the slice-based encoded video portion, transmits the encoded portions within a transport stream, and reassembles the encoded portions to present a subscriber (or user) with a comprehensive IPG. Through the IPG, the subscriber can identify available programming and select various services provided by their information service provider.
A user may transition from one IPG page to another, where each page contains a different graphics portion 102, i.e., a different program guide graphics. The details regarding the encoding and decoding of a series of IPG pages in accordance with the present invention are provided below.
Details regarding the operation of the IPG page of
The HEE 202 produces a plurality of digital streams that contain encoded information in illustratively MPEG-2 compressed format. These streams are modulated using a modulation technique that is compatible with a communications channel 230 that couples the HEE 202 to one or more LNE (in
In an interactive information distribution system such as the one described in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/984,710, filed Dec. 3, 1997, the program streams are addressed to particular subscriber equipment locations that requested the information through an interactive menu. A related interactive menu structure for requesting video-on-demand is disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 08/984,427, filed Dec. 3, 1997. Another example of interactive menu for requesting multimedia services is the interactive program guide (IPG) disclosed in commonly assigned U.S. patent application 60/093,891, filed in Jul. 23, 1998.
To assist a subscriber (or other viewer) in selecting programming, the HEE 202 produces information that can be assembled to create an IPG such as that shown in
A video source 214 supplies the video sequence for the video portion of the IPG to an encoding unit 216 of the present invention. Audio signals associated with the video sequence are supplied by an audio source 212 to the encoding and multiplexing unit 216. Additionally, a guide data source 232 provides program guide data to the encoding unit 216. This data is typically in a database format, where each entry describes a particular program by its title, presentation time, presentation date, descriptive information, channel, and program source.
The encoding unit 216 compresses a given video sequence into one or more elementary streams and the graphics produced from the guide data into one or more elementary streams. As described below with respect to
The streams are assembled into a transport stream that is then modulated by the cable modem 222 using a modulation format that is compatible with the head end communications channel 230. For example, the head end communications channel may be a fiber optic channel that carries high speed data from the HEE 202 to a plurality of LNE 228. The LNE 228 selects IPG page components that are applicable to its neighborhood and remodulates the selected data into a format that is compatible with a neighborhood distribution network 204. A detailed description of the LNE 228 is presented below with respect to
The subscriber equipment 206 contains a receiver 224 and a display 226 (e.g., a television). The receiver 224 demodulates the signals carried by the distribution network 204 and decodes the demodulated signals to extract the IPG pages from the stream. The details of the receiver 224 are described below with respect to
The system of the present invention is designed specifically to work in a slice-based ensemble encoding environment, where a plurality of bitstreams are generated to compress video information using a sliced-based technique. In the MPEG-2 standard, a “slice layer” may be created that divides a video frame into one or more “slices”. Each slice includes one or more macroblocks, where the macroblocks are illustratively defined as rectangular groups of pixels that tile the entire frame, e.g., a frame may consist of 30 rows and 22 columns of macroblocks. Any slice may start at any macroblock location in a frame and extend from left to right and top to bottom through the frame. The stop point of a slice can be chosen to be any macroblock start or end boundary. The slice layer syntax and its conventional use in forming an MPEG-2 bitstream is well known to those skilled in the art and shall not be described herein.
When the invention is used to encode an IPG comprising a graphics portion and a video portion, the slice-based technique separately encodes the video portion of the IPG and the grid graphics portion of the IPG. As such, the grid graphics portion and the video portion are represented by one or more different slices.
As depicted in
The encoding unit 216 comprises video processor 400, a graphics processor 402 and a controller 404. The video processor 400 comprises a compositor unit 406 and an encoder unit 408. The compositor unit 406 combines a video sequence with advertising video, advertiser or service provider logos, still graphics, animation, or other video information. The encoder unit 408 comprises one or more video encoders 410, e.g., a real-time MPEG-2 encoder and an audio encoder 412, e.g., an AC-3 encoder. The encoder unit 408 produces one or more elementary streams containing slice-based encoded video and audio information.
The video sequence is coupled to a real time video encoder 410. The video encoder then forms a slice based bitstream, e.g., an MPEG-2 compliant bit stream, for the video portion of an IPG. For purposes of this discussion, it is assumed that the GOP structure consists of an I-picture followed by ten B-pictures, where a P-picture separates each group of two B-pictures (i.e., “I-B-B-P-B-B-P-B-B-P-B-B-P-B-B”), however, any GOP structure and size may be used in different configurations and applications.
The video encoder 410 “pads” the graphics portion (illustratively the left half portion of IPG) with null data. This null data is replaced by the graphics grid slices, at a later step, within LNE. Since the video encoder processes only motion video information, excluding the graphics data, it is optimized for motion video encoding.
The controller 404 manages the slice-based encoding process such that the video encoding process is time and spatially synchronized with the grid encoding process. This is achieved by defining slice start and stop locations according to the objects in the IPG page layout and managing the encoding process as defined by the slices.
The graphics portion of the IPG is separately encoded in the graphics processor 402. The processor 402 is supplied guide data from the guide data source (232 in
The guide grid is a video frame that is encoded using a video encoder 416 optimized for video with text and graphics content. The video encoder 416, which can be implemented as software, slice-based encodes the guide data grid to produce one or more bitstreams that collectively represent the entire guide data grid. The encoder is optimized to effectively encode the graphics and text content.
The controller 404 defines the start and stop macroblock locations for each slice. The result is a GOP structure having intra-coded pictures containing I-picture slices and predicted pictures containing B and P-picture slices. The I-pictures slices are separated from the predicted picture slices. Each encoded slice is separately stored in a slice form grid page database 418. The individual slices can be addressed and recalled from the database 418 as required for transmission. The controller 404 controls the slice-based encoding process as well as manages the database 418.
The LNE 228 is programmed to extract particular information from the signal transmitted by the HEE 202. As such, the LNE can extract video and guide data grid slices that are targeted to the subscribers that are connected to the particular LNE. For example, the LNE 228 can extract specific channels for representation in the guide grid that are available to the subscribers connected to that particular LNE. As such, unavailable channels to a particular neighborhood would not be depicted in a subscriber's IPG. Additionally, the IPG can contain targeted advertising, e-commerce, program notes, and the like. As such, each LNE can combine different guide data slices with different video to produce IPG screens that are prepared specifically for the subscribers connected to that particular LNE. Other LNEs would select different IPG component information that is relevant to their associated subscribers.
The foregoing embodiments of the invention assumed that the IPG page was divided into one guide portion and one video portion. For example, in
To change pages in the guide, it is required to switch between programs (video PIDs for groups of slices) in a seamless manner. This cannot be done cleanly using a standard channel change by the receiver switching from PID to PID directly, because such an operation flushes the video and audio buffers and typically gives half a second blank screen.
To have seamless decoder switching, a splice countdown (or random access indicator) method is employed at the end of each video sequence to indicate the point at which the video should be switched from one PID to another.
Using the same profile and constant bit rate coding for the video and graphics encoding units, the generated streams for different IPG pages are formed in a similar length compared to each other. This is due to the fact that the source material is almost identical differing only in the characters in the guide from one page to another. In this way, while streams are generated having nearly identical lengths, the streams are not exactly the same length. For example, for any given sequence of 15 video frames, the number of transport packets in the sequence varies from one guide page to another. Thus, a finer adjustment is required to synchronize the beginnings and ends of each sequence across all guide pages in order for the countdown switching to work.
The invention provides the act of synchronization of a plurality of streams that provides seamless switching at the receiver.
Three methods are provided for that purpose.
First, for each sequence the multiplexer in the LNE identifies the length of the longest guide page for that particular sequence, and then adds sufficient null packets to the end of each other guide page so that all the guide pages become the same length. Then, the multiplexer adds the switching packets at the end of the sequence, after all the null packets.
The second method requires buffering of all the packets for all guide pages for each sequence. If this is allowed in the considered system, then the packets can be ordered in the transport stream such that the packets for each guide page appear at slightly higher or lower frequencies, so that they all finish at the same point. Then, the switching packets are added by the multiplexer in the LNE at the end of each stream without the null padding.
A third method is to start each sequence together, and then wait until all the packets for all the guide pages have been generated. Once the generation of all packets is completed, switching packets are placed in the streams at the same time and point in each stream.
Depending on the implementation of decoder units within the receiver and requirements of the considered application, each one of the methods can be applied with advantages: For example, the first method, which is null-padding, can be applied to avoid bursts of N packets of the same PID into a decoder's video buffer faster than the MPEG specified rate (e.g., 1.5 Mbit).
The teachings of the above three methods can be extended apply to similar synchronization problems and to derive similar methods for ensuring synchronization during stream switching.
Transport stream demultiplexer 1430, in response to a control signal TD produced by controller 1470, demultiplexes (i.e., extracts) an audio information stream A and a video information stream V. The audio information stream A is coupled to audio decoder 1440, which decodes the audio information stream and presents the decoded audio information stream to an audio processor (not shown) for subsequent presentation. The video stream V is coupled to the video decoder 1450, which decodes the compressed video stream V to produce an uncompressed video stream VD that is coupled to the video compositor 1490. OSD 1460, in response to a control signal OSD produced by controller 1470, produces a graphical overlay signal VOSD that is coupled to the video compositor 1490. During transitions between streams representing the user interfaces, buffers in the decoder are not reset. As such, the user interfaces seamlessly transition from one screen to another.
The video compositor 1490 merges the graphical overlay signal VOSD and the uncompressed video stream VD to produce a modified video stream (i.e., the underlying video images with the graphical overlay) that is coupled to the frame store unit 1462. The frame store unit 1462 stores the modified video stream on a frame-by-frame basis according to the frame rate of the video stream. Frame store unit 1462 provides the stored video frames to a video processor (not shown) for subsequent processing and presentation on a display device.
Controller 1470 comprises a microprocessor 1472, an input/output module 1474, a memory 1476, an infrared (IR) receiver 1475 and support circuitry 1478. The microprocessor 1472 cooperates with conventional support circuitry 1478 such as power supplies, clock circuits, cache memory and the like as well as circuits that assist in executing the software routines that are stored in memory 1476. The controller 1470 also contains input/output circuitry 1474 that forms an interface between the controller 1470 and the tuner 1410, the transport demultiplexer 1430, the onscreen display unit 1460, the back channel modulator 1495, and the remote control unit 1480. Although the controller 1470 is depicted as a general purpose computer that is programmed to perform specific interactive program guide control function in accordance with the present invention, the invention can be implemented in hardware as an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC). As such, the process steps described herein are intended to be broadly interpreted as being equivalently performed by software, hardware, or a combination thereof.
In the exemplary embodiment of
After the signal is tuned and demodulated, the video streams are recombined via stream processing routine 1402 to form the video sequences that were originally compressed. The processing unit 1402 employs a variety of methods to recombine the slice-based streams, including, using PID filter 1404, demultiplexer 1430, as discussed in the next sections of this, disclosure of the invention. Note that the PID filter implemented illustratively as part of the demodulator is utilized to filter the undesired PIDs and retrieve the desired PIDs from the transport stream. The packets to be extracted and decoded to form a particular IPG are identified by a PID mapping table (PMT) 1477. After the stream processing unit 1402 has processed the streams into the correct order (assuming the correct order was not produced in the LNE), the slices are sent to the MPEG decoder 1450 to generate the original uncompressed IPG pages. If an exemplary transport stream with two PIDs as discussed in previous parts of the this disclosure, excluding data and audio streams, is received, then the purpose of the stream processing unit 1402 is to recombine the intra-coded slices with their corresponding predictive-coded slices in the correct order before the recombined streams are coupled to the video decoder. This complete process is implemented as software or hardware. In the illustrated IPG page slice structure, only one slice is assigned per row and each row is divided into two portions, therefore, each slice is divided into guide portion and video portion. In order for the receiving terminal to reconstruct the original video frames, one method is to construct a first row from its two slices in the correct order by retrieving two corresponding slices from the transport stream, then construct a second row from its two slices, and so on. For this purpose, a receiver is required to process two PIDs in a time period. The PID filter can be programmed to pass two desired PIDs and filter out the undesired PIDs. The desired PIDs are identified by the controller 1470 after the user selects an IPG page to review. A PID mapping table (1477 of
E1. Recombination Method 1
In this first method, intra-coded slice-based streams (I-streams) and the predictive-coded slice-based streams (PRED streams) to be recombined keep their separate PID's until the point where they must be depacketized. The recombination process is conducted within the demultiplexer 1430 of the subscriber equipment For illustrative purposes, assuming a multi-program transport stream with each program consisting of I-PIDs for each intra-coded guide slice, I-PIDs for the intra-coded video slices, one PRED-PID for predicted guide and video, an audio-PID, and multiple data-PIDs, any packet with a PID that matches any of the PID's within the desired program (as identified in a program mapping table) are depacketized and the payload is sent to the elementary stream video decoder. Payloads are sent to the decoder in exactly in the order in which the packets arrive at the demultiplexer.
At step 1515, the I-PID packets (e.g., packets having PID-1 and PID-11) are extracted from the transport stream, including the header information and data, until the next picture start code. The header information within the first-received I-PID access unit includes sequence header, sequence extension, group start code, GOP header, picture header, and picture extension, which are known to a reader that is skilled in MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 compression standards. The header information in the next I-PID access units that belongs to the second and later GOP's includes group start code, picture start code, picture header, and extension. The method 1500 then proceeds to step 1520 where the payloads of the packets that includes header information related to video stream and I-picture data are coupled to the video decoder 1550 as video information stream V. The method 1500 then proceeds to step 1525.
At step 1525, the predicted picture slice-based stream packets PRED-PID, illustratively the PID-11 packets of fourteen predicted pictures in a GOP of size fifteen, are extracted from the transport stream. At step 1530, the payloads of the packets that includes header information related to video stream and predicted-picture data are coupled to the video decoder 1550 as video information stream V. At the end of step 1530, a complete GOP, including the I-picture and the predicted-picture slices, are available to the video decoder 1550. As the payloads are sent to the decoder in exactly in the order in which the packets arrive at the demultiplexer, the video decoder decodes the recombined stream with no additional recombination process. The method 1500 then proceeds to step 1535.
At step 1535, a query is made as to whether a different I-PID is requested, e.g., new IPG is selected. If the query at step 1535 is answered negatively, then the method 1500 proceeds to step 1510 where the transport demultiplexer 1530 waits for the next packets having the PID of the desired I-picture slices. If the query at step 1535 is answered affirmatively, then the PID of the new desired I-picture slices is identified at step 1540 and the method 1500 returns to step 1510.
The method 1500 of
E2. Recombination Method 2
The second method of recombining the video stream involves the modification of the transport stream using a PID filter. A PID filter 1404 can be implemented as part of the demodulator 1420 of
For illustrative purposes, assuming a multi-program transport stream with each program consisting of an I-PIDs for both video and guide, PRED-PID for both video and guide, audio-PID, and data-PID, any packet with a PID that matches any of the PIDs within the desired program as identified by the program mapping table to be received have its PID modified to the lowest video PID in the program (the PID which is referenced first in the program's program mapping table (PMT)). For example, in a program, assuming that a guide slice I-PID is 50, the video slice I-PID is 51 and PRED-PID is 52. Then, the PID-filter modifies the video I-PID and the PRED-PID as 50 and thereby, I- and Predicted-Picture slice access units attain the same PID number and become a portion of a common stream.
As a result, the transport stream output from the PID filter contains a program with a single video stream, whose packets appear in the proper order to be decoded as valid MPEG bitstream.
Note that the incoming bit stream does not necessarily contain any packets with a PID equal to the lowest video PID referenced in the programs PMT. Also note that it is possible to modify the video PID's to other PID numbers than lowest PID without changing the operation of the algorithm.
When the PID's of incoming packets are modified to match the PID's of other packets in the transport stream, the continuity counters of the merged PID's may become invalid at the merge points, due to each PID having its own continuity counter. For this reason, the discontinuity indicator in the adaptation field is set for any packets that may immediately follow a merge point. Any decoder components that check the continuity counter for continuity is required to correctly process the discontinuity indicator bit.
At step 1615, the PID number of the I-stream is re-mapped to a predetermined number, PID*. At this step, the PID filter modifies all the PID's of the desired I-stream packets to PID*. The method then proceeds to step 1620, wherein the PID number of the predicted picture slice streams, PRED-PID, is re-mapped to PID*. At this step, the PID filter modifies all the PID's of the PRED-PID packets to PID*. The method 1600 then proceeds to step 1625.
At step 1625, the packets of the PID* stream are extracted from the transport stream by the demultiplexer. The method 1600 then proceeds to step 1630, where the payloads of the packets that includes video stream header information and I-picture and predicted picture slices are coupled to the video decoder as video information stream V. Note that the slice packets are ordered in the transport stream in the same order as they are to be decoded, i.e., a guide slice packets of first row followed by video slice packets of first row, second row, and so on. The method 1600 then proceeds to 1635.
At step 1635, a query is made as to whether a different set of (two) I-PIDs are requested. If the query at step 1635 is answered negatively, then the method 1600 proceeds to step 1610 where the transport demultiplexer waits for the next packets having the identified I-PIDs. If the query at step 1635 is answered affirmatively, then the two PIDs of the new desired I-picture is identified at step 1640 and the method 1600 returns to step 1610.
The method 1600 of
E3. Recombination Method 3
The third method accomplishes MPEG bitstream recombination by using splicing information in the adaptation field of the transport packet headers by switching between video PIDs based on splice countdown concept.
In this method, the MPEG streams signal the PID to PID switch points using the splice countdown field in the transport packet header's adaptation field. When the PID filter is programmed to receive one of the PIDs in a program's PMT, the reception of a packet containing a splice countdown value of 0 in its header's adaptation field causes immediate reprogramming of the PID filter to receive the other video PID. Note that a special attention to splicing syntax is required in systems where splicing is used also for other purposes.
At step 1715, the I-PID packets are extracted from the transport stream until, and including, the I-PID packet with slice countdown value of zero. The method 1700 then proceeds to step 1720 where the payloads of the packets that includes header information related to video stream and I-picture slice data are coupled to the video decoder as video information stream V. The method 1700 then proceeds to step 1725.
At step 1725, the PID filter is re-programmed to receive the predicted picture packets PRED-PID. The method 1700 then proceeds to 1730. At step 1730, the predicted stream packets, illustratively the PID11 packets of predicted picture slices, are extracted from the transport stream. At step 1735, the payloads of the packets that includes header information related to video stream and predicted-picture data are coupled to the video decoder. At the end of step 1735, a complete GOP, including the I-picture slices and the predicted-picture slices, are available to the video decoder. As the payloads are sent to the decoder in exactly in the order in which the packets arrive at the demultiplexer, the video decoder decodes the recombined stream with no additional recombination process. The method 1700 then proceeds to step 1740.
At step 1740, a query is made as to whether a different I-PID set (two) is requested. If the query at step 1740 is answered negatively, then the method 1700 proceeds to step 1750 where the PID filter is re-programmed to receive the previous desired I-PIDs. If answered affirmatively, then the PIDs of the new desired I-picture is identified at step 1745 and the method proceeds to step 1750, where the PID filter is re-programmed to receive the new desired I-PIDs. The method then proceeds to step 1745, where the transport demultiplexer waits for the next packets having the PIDs of the desired I-picture.
The method 1700 of
E4. Recombination Method 4
For the receiving systems that do not include a PID filter and for those receiving systems in which the demultiplexer can not process two PIDs for splicing the streams, a fourth method presented herein provides the stream recombination. In a receiver that cannot process two PIDs, two or more streams with different PIDs are spliced together via an additional splicing software or hardware and can be implemented as part of the demultiplexer. The process is described below with respect to
In this manner, the slices are spliced together by the hardware within the receiver. To facilitate recombining the slices, the receiver is sent an array of valid PID values for recombining the slices through a user data in the transport stream or another communications link to the STT from the HEE. The array is updated dynamically to ensure that the correct portions of the IPG are presented to the user correctly. Since the splice points in slice based streams may occur at a frequent level, a software application may not have the capability to control the hardware for splicing operation as discussed above. If this is the case, then, firmware is dedicated to control the demodulator hardware for splicing process at a higher rate than a software application can handle.
The video streams representing the IPG may be carried in a single transport stream or multiple transport streams, within the form of a single or multi-programs as discussed below with respect to the description of the encoding system. A user desiring to view the next 1.5 hour time interval (e.g., 9:30-11:00) may activate a “scroll right” object (or move the joystick to the right when a program within program grid occupies the final displayed time interval). Such activation results in the controller of the STT noting that a new time interval is desired. The video stream corresponding to the new time interval is then decoded and displayed. If the corresponding video stream is within the same transport stream (i.e., a new PID), then the stream is immediately decoded and presented. If the corresponding video stream is within a different transport stream, then the related transport stream is extracted from the broadcast stream and the related video stream is decoded and presented. If the corresponding transport stream is within a different broadcast stream, then the related broadcast stream is tuned, the corresponding transport stream is extracted, and the desired video stream is decoded and presented.
It is important to note that each extracted video stream is associated with a common audio stream. Thus, the video/audio barker function of the program guide is continuously provided, regardless of the selected video stream. Also note that the teachings of the invention is equally applicable to systems and user interfaces that employs multiple audio streams.
Similarly, a user interaction resulting in a prior time interval or a different set of channels results in the retrieval and presentation of a related video stream. If the related video stream is not part of the broadcast video streams, then a pointcast session is initiated. For this purpose, the STT sends a request to the head end via the back channel requesting a particular stream. The head end then processes the request, retrieves the related guide and video streams from the information server, incorporates the streams within a transport stream as discussed above (preferably, the transport stream currently being tuned/selected by the STT) and informs the STT which PIDs should be received, and from which transport stream should be demultiplexed. The STT then extracts the related PIDs for the IPG. In the case of the PID being within a different transport stream, the STT first demultiplexes the corresponding transport stream (possibly tuning a different QAM stream within the forward channel).
Upon completion of the viewing of the desired stream, the STT indicates to the head end that it no longer needs the stream, whereupon the head end tears down the pointcast session. The viewer is then returned to the broadcast stream from which the pointcast session was launched.
Although various embodiments which incorporate the teachings of the present invention have been shown and described in detail herein, those skilled in the art can readily devise many other varied embodiments that still incorporate these teachings. An important note is that the method and apparatus described herein is applicable to any number of slice assignments to a video frame and any type of slice structures. The presented algorithms are also applicable to any number of PID assignments to intra-coded and predictive-coded slice based streams. For example, multiple PIDs can be assigned to the predictive-coded slices without loss of generality. Also note that the method and apparatus described herein is fully applicable picture based encoding by assigning each picture only to a one slice, where each picture is encoded then as a full frame instead of multiple slices.
One aspect of the present invention relates to providing picture-in-picture (PIP) functionality using slice-based encoding. The PIP functionality supplies multiple (instead of singular) video content. The present invention also relates to providing an additional user interface (UI) layer on top (presented to the viewer as an initial screen) of the interactive program guide (IPG). The additional UI layer extends the functionality of the IPG from a programming guide to a multi-functional user interface. The multi-functional user interface may be used to provide portal functionality to such applications as electronic commerce, advertisement, video-on-demand, and other applications.
A matrix representation of IPG data with single video content is described above in relation to
In the example illustrated in
As shown in
In the example illustrated in
As shown in
In accordance with an embodiment of the present invention, for each time t2 through t15, the packets containing the skipped guide pages follow the corresponding packets containing the predictive-coded video frames. For example, for time t2, the first row of skipped guide packets 2102 follow the first row of predictive-coded packets 2002. For time t3, the second row of skipped guide packets 2103 follow the second row of predictive-coded packets 2003. And so on.
The three packetized audio streams 2202, 2204, and 2206 are input into a multiplexer 2208. The multiplexer 2208 combines the three streams into a single audio packet stream 2210. The single audio stream 2210 is then input into a remultiplexer 2212. An alternate embodiment of the present invention may input the three streams 2202, 2204, and 2206 directly into the remultiplexer 2212, instead of first creating the single audio stream 2210.
The video and graphic packet stream 2214 is also input into the remultiplexer 2212. As described above in relation to
The remultiplexer 2212 combines the video and graphic packet stream 2214 with the audio packet stream 2210 to generate a transport stream 2216. In one embodiment, the transport stream 2216 interleaves the audio packets with video and graphics packets. In particular, the interleaving may be done such that the audio packets for time t1 are next to the video and graphics packets for time t1, the audio packets for time t2 are next to the video and graphics packets for time t2, and so on.
Part (b) on the right side of
The first compositor 2402 receives a first set of three full-size video inputs which correspond to the first row of video objects O1, O2, and O3 in
The second compositor 2404 receives the first composite video signal 2403 from the first compositor 2402. The second compositor 2404 also receives a second set of three full-size video inputs which corresponds to the second row of video objects O4, O5, and O6 in
The third compositor 2406 receives the second composite video signal 2405 and a third set of three full-size video inputs which corresponds to the third row of video objects O7, O8, and O9 in
An encoder 2408 receives the third composite video signal 2407 and digitally encodes it to form a video object stream 2409. The encoding may be slice-based encoding using the partitioning shown in
The multiplexed packetized audio stream 2504 includes multiple audio streams which are multiplexed together. Each audio stream may belong to a corresponding video object. The multiplexed packetized audio stream 2504 is input into a remultiplexer (remux) 2506.
The video object stream 2502 is also input into the remultiplexer 2506. The encoding of the video object stream 2502 may be slice-based encoding using the partitioning shown in
The remultiplexer 2506 combines the video object stream 2502 with the multiplexed packetized audio stream 2504 to generate an object transport stream 2508. In one embodiment, the object transport stream 2508 interleaves the audio packets with video object packets. In particular, the interleaving may be done such that the audio packets for time t1 are next to the video object packets for time t1, the audio packets for time t2 are next to the video object packets for time t2, and so on.
The demultiplexer 2602 receives the object transport stream 2508 and demultiplexes the stream 2508 to separate out the video object stream 2502 and the multiplexed packetized audio stream 2504. The video object stream 2502 is further processed by the video decoder 2604. For example, as illustrated in
Each of the displayed objects may be selected by a user interacting with a set-top terminal. For example, if the user selects the channel A object, then the display may change to show a relevant interactive program guide (IPG) page 2704. The relevant IPG page 2704 may include, for example, a reduced-size version of the current broadcast on channel A and guide data with upcoming programming for channel A or the guide page where channel A is located. The audio may also change to the audio stream corresponding to channel A.
As another example, if the user selects the advertisement object, then the display may change to show a related advertisement video (ad video) 2706. Further, this advertisement video may be selected, leading to an electronic commerce page relating to the advertisement. The audio may also change to an audio stream corresponding to the advertisement video.
As yet another example, if the user selects the VOD object, then the display may change to show a VOD window 2708 which enables and facilitates selection of VOD content by the user. Further, once the user selects a particular video for on-demand display, an electronic commerce page may be displayed to make the transaction between the user and the VOD provider.
As yet another example, if the user selects the electronic commerce (e-commerce) object, then the display may change to show an e-commerce window 2710 which enables and facilitates electronic commerce. For example, the e-commerce window 2710 may comprise a hypertext markup language (HTML) page including various multimedia content and hyperlinks. The hyperlinks may, for example, link to content on the world wide web, or link to additional HTML pages which provides further product information or opportunities to make transactions.
In a first step 2902, the video decoder 2604 (decodes and) outputs the video object page 2606 which includes the nine objects O1 through O9. In a second step 2904, a user selects an object via a set top terminal or remote control. For example, the object may be the first object O1 which may correspond to channel A. In this example, selection of the first object O1 results in the display on a corresponding IPG page 2704 including guide data and a reduced-size version of the channel A broadcast.
In a third step 2906, a PID filter is reprogrammed to receive packets for O1 and associated guide data. For example, if packets for video object O1 are identified by PID 101, and packets for the associated guide data are identified by PID 1, then the PID filter would be reprogrammed to receive packets with PID 101 and PID 1. This filtering step 2906 is described further below in relation to
In a fourth step 2908, a demultiplexer (Demux) depacketizes slices of the first object O1 and associated guide data. Note that this step 2908 and the previous step 2906 are combined in some of the related methods of
Finally, in a sixth step 2912, a video decoder decodes and outputs the IPG page for viewing by the user.
In the example illustrated in
Similarly, the skipped-coded guide packets 3006 include skipped-coded data for the second through last frames of each GOP for each of ten IPG pages. These skipped-coded packets 3006 may be identified, for example, by PID 11 as described above in relation to
In the example illustrated in
The transport stream 3002 is filtered 3010 by a PID filter. The filtering process 3010 results in received packets 3012. For example, if the PID filter is programmed to receive only packets corresponding to the first object O1 (PID 101) and associated guide data (PIDs 1 and 11), then the received packets 3012 would include only those packets with PIDs 101, 1, and 11.
The above discussed encoding and delivery methods for PIP utilizes a combination of broadcast/demandcast traffic model where multiple video signals are broadcast and delivered to the set top box even the viewer does not utilize some of the video content at a particular time. Such an approach makes response times far more consistent, and far less sensitive to the number of subscribers served. Typical latencies may remain sub-second even when the subscriber count in a single modulation group (aggregation of nodes) exceeds 10 thousand. On the other hand, the bandwidth necessary to delivery the content increases compared to a point-to-point traffic model. However, with the advantage of the slice-based recombinant MPEG compression techniques, the latency reduction of broadcast/demandcast model is achieved without much bandwidth compromise.
In addition, with a server-centric content generation and control, the transport streams containing tremendous motion video information is delivered and decoded directly through the transport demultiplexer and MPEG decoder without being accessible to the microprocessor, saving processing and memory resources and costs at set top terminal.
The multi-functional user interface supports any combination of full-motion video windows, at least one or more of these video inputs can be driven from existing ad-insertion equipment enabling the operator to leverage existing equipment and infrastructure, including ad traffic and billing systems, to quickly realize added revenues. The discussed system does not have any new requirements for ad production. The ads can be the same as are inserted into any other broadcast channels.
A unique feature of the head-end centric system discussed in previous sections (for encoding and delivery of interactive program guide, multi-functional user interfaces, picture-in-picture type of applications) is the combined processing of realtime and non-realtime multimedia content. In other words, the discussed head-end centric system architecture can be utilized for other related applications that contain realtime and non-realtime content in similar ways with the teachings of this invention. For further clarification,
The apparatus includes a non-realtime content source 3202, a realtime content source, a non-realtime encoder 3206, a rate control unit 3208, a realtime encoder 3210 (including a realtime video encoder 3211 and a realtime audio encoder 3212), a slice combiner 3214, a remultiplexer 3216, a re-timestamp unit 3218, and a clock unit 3220.
In a preferred embodiment of the present invention, the apparatus shown in
In a preferred embodiment, the non-realtime content includes guide page graphics content for an interactive program guide (IPG), and the realtime content includes video and audio advertisement content for insertion into the IPG.
In a preferred embodiment, the rate control unit 3208 implements an algorithm which sets the bit rate for the output of the non-realtime encoder 3206. Based on a desired total bit rate, the algorithm may substract out a maximum bit rate anticipated for the realtime video and audio encoded signals. The resultant difference would basically give the allowed bit rate for the output of the non-realtime encoder 106. In a slice-based embodiment, this allowed bit rate would be divided by the number of slices to determine the allowed bit rate per slice of the IPG content. In a page-based embodiment, this allowed bit rate would be the allowed bit rate per page of the IPG content.
In a preferred embodiment, the re-timestamp unit 3218 receives a common clock signal from the common clock unit 3220 and generates therefrom presentation and decoding timestamps. These timestamps are transferred to the remultiplexer (Remux) 3216 for use in re-timestamping the packets (overriding existing timestamps from the encoders 3206, 3211, and 3212). The re-timestamping synchronizes the non-realtime and realtime content so that non-realtime and realtime content intended to be displayed in a single frame are displayed at the same time.
In a preferred embodiment, the common clock unit 3220 also provides a common clock stream to the set-top terminals. The common clock stream is transmitted in parallel with the transport stream.
The present application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/265,752, filed Oct. 7, 2002, entitled “Method and System for Providing a Program Guide and Multiple Video Streams Using Slice-Based Encoding,” which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/454,216 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,481,012), filed Dec. 9, 1999, entitled “Picture-in-Picture and Multiple Video Streams Using Slice-Based Encoding,” which is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/428,066 (now U.S. Pat. No. 6,651,252), filed Oct. 27, 1999, entitled “Method and Apparatus for Transmitting Video and Graphics in a Compressed Form,” the disclosures of which are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3754211 | Rocher et al. | Aug 1973 | A |
4213124 | Barda et al. | Jul 1980 | A |
4250356 | Hammer, Jr. et al. | Feb 1981 | A |
4250521 | Wright | Feb 1981 | A |
4290063 | Traster | Sep 1981 | A |
4381522 | Lambert | Apr 1983 | A |
4437093 | Bradley | Mar 1984 | A |
4479142 | Buschman et al. | Oct 1984 | A |
4496976 | Swanson et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
4520356 | O'Keefe et al. | May 1985 | A |
4567512 | Abraham | Jan 1986 | A |
RE32187 | Barda et al. | Jun 1986 | E |
4600921 | Thomas | Jul 1986 | A |
4633297 | Skerlos et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4706121 | Young | Nov 1987 | A |
4712239 | Frezza et al. | Dec 1987 | A |
4734764 | Pocock et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4739318 | Cohen | Apr 1988 | A |
4742344 | Nakagawa et al. | May 1988 | A |
4745468 | Von Kohorn | May 1988 | A |
4751578 | Reiter et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
4792848 | Nussrallah et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4792849 | McCalley et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4829372 | McCalley et al. | May 1989 | A |
4829569 | Seth-Smith et al. | May 1989 | A |
4847825 | Levine | Jul 1989 | A |
4860123 | McCalley et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
4866770 | Seth-Smith et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4876592 | Von Kohorn | Oct 1989 | A |
4884267 | Miyamoto et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
4885775 | Lucas | Dec 1989 | A |
4890321 | Seth-Smith et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4905094 | Pocock et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4908713 | Levine | Mar 1990 | A |
4926255 | Von Kohorn | May 1990 | A |
4941040 | Pocock et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4963994 | Levine | Oct 1990 | A |
4977455 | Young | Dec 1990 | A |
4991011 | Johnson et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
4994908 | Kuban et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5014125 | Pocock et al. | May 1991 | A |
5027400 | Baji et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5034807 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1991 | A |
5038211 | Hallenbeck | Aug 1991 | A |
5057915 | Von Kohorn | Oct 1991 | A |
5058160 | Banker et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5070400 | Lieberman | Dec 1991 | A |
5109279 | Ando | Apr 1992 | A |
5113496 | McCalley et al. | May 1992 | A |
5119188 | McCalley et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5123046 | Levine | Jun 1992 | A |
5128752 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1992 | A |
5130792 | Tindell et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5146210 | Heberle | Sep 1992 | A |
5151789 | Young | Sep 1992 | A |
5153763 | Pidgeon | Oct 1992 | A |
5182640 | Takano | Jan 1993 | A |
5191410 | McCalley et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5195092 | Wilson et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
5208665 | McCalley et al. | May 1993 | A |
5227874 | Von Kohorn | Jul 1993 | A |
5231665 | Auld et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5239540 | Rovira et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5247364 | Banker et al. | Sep 1993 | A |
5249044 | Von Kohorn | Sep 1993 | A |
5260778 | Kauffman et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5270809 | Gammie et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5283734 | Von Kohorn | Feb 1994 | A |
5293357 | Hallenbeck | Mar 1994 | A |
5297204 | Levine | Mar 1994 | A |
5301028 | Banker et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5303295 | West et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5307173 | Yuen et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5317391 | Banker et al. | May 1994 | A |
5319454 | Schutte | Jun 1994 | A |
5319455 | Hoarty et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5319707 | Wasilewski et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5335079 | Yuen et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5351075 | Herz et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5353121 | Young et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5357276 | Banker et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5359601 | Wasilewski et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5361091 | Hoarty et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5365282 | Levine | Nov 1994 | A |
5373330 | Levine | Dec 1994 | A |
5376969 | Zdepski | Dec 1994 | A |
5382983 | Kwoh et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5400401 | Wasilewski et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5400402 | Garfinkle | Mar 1995 | A |
5406558 | Rovira et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5410367 | Zahavi et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5414448 | Wada et al. | May 1995 | A |
5414756 | Levine | May 1995 | A |
5420647 | Levine | May 1995 | A |
5420866 | Wasilewski | May 1995 | A |
5422674 | Hooper et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5428404 | Ingram et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
5438370 | Primiano et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5440632 | Bacon et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5448568 | Delpuch et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5473609 | Chaney | Dec 1995 | A |
5473704 | Abe | Dec 1995 | A |
5475382 | Yuen et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5477262 | Banker et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479266 | Young et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5479268 | Young et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5481542 | Logston et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5483287 | Siracusa | Jan 1996 | A |
5485197 | Hoarty | Jan 1996 | A |
5485221 | Banker et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5488409 | Yuen et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5493339 | Birch et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5493638 | Hooper et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5500933 | Schnorf | Mar 1996 | A |
5502504 | Marshall et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5508815 | Levine | Apr 1996 | A |
5515106 | Chaney et al. | May 1996 | A |
5515173 | Mankovitz et al. | May 1996 | A |
5517257 | Dunn et al. | May 1996 | A |
5523794 | Mankovitz et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5523796 | Marshall et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5526034 | Hoarty et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
5530754 | Garfinkle | Jun 1996 | A |
5532732 | Yuen et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5532754 | Young et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5534944 | Egawa et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5539391 | Yuen | Jul 1996 | A |
5539822 | Lett | Jul 1996 | A |
5543852 | Yuen et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5543853 | Haskell et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5544161 | Bigham et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550576 | Klosterman | Aug 1996 | A |
5550863 | Yurt et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5552837 | Mankovitz | Sep 1996 | A |
5553123 | Chan et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559548 | Davis et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559549 | Hendricks et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5559550 | Mankovitz | Sep 1996 | A |
5559870 | Patton et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5568272 | Levine | Oct 1996 | A |
5579055 | Hamilton et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5579057 | Banker et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5581614 | Ng et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583560 | Florin et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5583576 | Perlman et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585838 | Lawler et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585865 | Amano et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5585866 | Miller et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5589892 | Knee et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5592551 | Lett et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594509 | Florin et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5596373 | White et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598415 | Nuber et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5598525 | Nally et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5600364 | Hendricks et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5600378 | Wasilewski et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5600711 | Yuen | Feb 1997 | A |
5604528 | Edwards et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5619247 | Russo | Apr 1997 | A |
5619249 | Billock et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5619269 | Lee et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5619274 | Roop et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5619337 | Naimpally | Apr 1997 | A |
5619383 | Ngai | Apr 1997 | A |
5621579 | Yuen | Apr 1997 | A |
5623308 | Civanlar et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625405 | DuLac et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5625406 | Newberry et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5630119 | Aristides et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633683 | Rosengren et al. | May 1997 | A |
5633810 | Mandal et al. | May 1997 | A |
5635978 | Alten et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5635989 | Rothmuller | Jun 1997 | A |
5639350 | Aula et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644354 | Thompson et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652614 | Okabayashi | Jul 1997 | A |
5652615 | Bryant et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5657072 | Aristides et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659350 | Hendricks et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5659367 | Yuen | Aug 1997 | A |
5666487 | Goodman et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5666645 | Thomas et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5668599 | Cheney et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5673089 | Yuen et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
5675575 | Wall, Jr. et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682511 | Sposato et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5684525 | Klosterman | Nov 1997 | A |
5687331 | Volk et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5692214 | Levine | Nov 1997 | A |
5694176 | Bruette et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5699107 | Lawler et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5701383 | Russo et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5703877 | Nuber et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5710601 | Marshall et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5710610 | Kim | Jan 1998 | A |
5714273 | Wake et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5715515 | Akins, III et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5716273 | Yuen | Feb 1998 | A |
5719646 | Kikuchi et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5724203 | Kwoh et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5724525 | Beyers, II et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5724543 | Ozden et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5724646 | Ganek et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5727060 | Young | Mar 1998 | A |
5729549 | Kostreski et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5731844 | Rauch et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5732217 | Emura | Mar 1998 | A |
5734589 | Kostreski et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734853 | Hendricks et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5745710 | Clanton, III et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5751282 | Girard et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754783 | Mendelson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5754940 | Smith et al. | May 1998 | A |
5757416 | Birch et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758257 | Herz et al. | May 1998 | A |
5758259 | Lawler | May 1998 | A |
5764739 | Patton et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768491 | Lobodzinski et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768539 | Metz et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5768551 | Bleiweiss et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5771064 | Lett | Jun 1998 | A |
5780474 | Peglion et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5781228 | Sposato | Jul 1998 | A |
5781245 | Van Der Weij et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5784095 | Robbins et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5790172 | Imanaka | Aug 1998 | A |
5790198 | Roop et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5790806 | Koperda | Aug 1998 | A |
5793364 | Bolanos et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5793410 | Rao | Aug 1998 | A |
5793438 | Bedard | Aug 1998 | A |
5798785 | Hendricks et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5801747 | Bedard | Sep 1998 | A |
5801753 | Eyer | Sep 1998 | A |
5801785 | Crump et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5801787 | Schein et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5802063 | Deiss | Sep 1998 | A |
5805155 | Allibhoy et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805204 | Thompson et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805762 | Boyce et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5805763 | Lawler et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5808608 | Young et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5809204 | Young et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812123 | Rowe et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812205 | Milnes et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5812754 | Lui et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5815145 | Matthews, III | Sep 1998 | A |
5818438 | Howe et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5818439 | Nagasaka et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822014 | Steyer et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822123 | Davis et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5822324 | Kostresti et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5826110 | Ozden et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828420 | Marshall et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5828945 | Klosterman | Oct 1998 | A |
RE35954 | Levine | Nov 1998 | E |
5835792 | Wise et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838383 | Chimoto et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838678 | Davis et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5838873 | Blatter et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5841433 | Chaney | Nov 1998 | A |
5844600 | Kerr | Dec 1998 | A |
5844620 | Coleman et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5847771 | Cloutier et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850218 | Lajoie et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5850232 | Engstrom et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5852478 | Kwoh | Dec 1998 | A |
5854840 | Cannella, Jr. | Dec 1998 | A |
5859660 | Perkins et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5859949 | Yanagihara | Jan 1999 | A |
5861881 | Freeman et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5861906 | Dunn et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
5867208 | McLaren | Feb 1999 | A |
5870150 | Yuen | Feb 1999 | A |
5870474 | Wasilewski et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5880768 | Lemmons | Mar 1999 | A |
5892508 | Howe et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5894328 | Negishi | Apr 1999 | A |
5903314 | Niijima et al. | May 1999 | A |
5903816 | Broadwin et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907323 | Lawler et al. | May 1999 | A |
5914757 | Dean et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5915068 | Levine | Jun 1999 | A |
5917830 | Chen et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5926230 | Niijima et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5933141 | Smith | Aug 1999 | A |
5940073 | Klosterman et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5940738 | Rao | Aug 1999 | A |
5945987 | Dunn | Aug 1999 | A |
5949476 | Pocock et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5949792 | Yasuda et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5951639 | MacInnis | Sep 1999 | A |
5956088 | Shen et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5965088 | Lever et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966120 | Arazi et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5966162 | Goode et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5978043 | Blonstein et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5978855 | Metz et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982445 | Eyer et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5986650 | Ellis et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987245 | Gish | Nov 1999 | A |
5990927 | Hendricks et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5990972 | Bond-Harris et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991799 | Yen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995095 | Ratakonda | Nov 1999 | A |
5999173 | Ubillos | Dec 1999 | A |
6002394 | Schein et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6002444 | Marshall et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005561 | Hawkins et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005562 | Shiga et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005565 | Legall et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005601 | Ohkura et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6005631 | Anderson et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6006256 | Zdepski et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6008803 | Rowe et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6014184 | Knee et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6014368 | Sanami | Jan 2000 | A |
6016144 | Blonstein et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6018372 | Etheredge | Jan 2000 | A |
6022223 | Taniguchi et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6025837 | Matthews, III et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6029045 | Picco et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6034677 | Noguchi et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6038000 | Hurst, Jr. | Mar 2000 | A |
6040867 | Bando et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044396 | Adams | Mar 2000 | A |
6049831 | Gardell et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061097 | Satterfield | May 2000 | A |
6061399 | Lyons et al. | May 2000 | A |
6061451 | Muratani et al. | May 2000 | A |
6062868 | Toriumi | May 2000 | A |
6064376 | Berezowski et al. | May 2000 | A |
6075575 | Schein et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6104391 | Johnston, Jr. et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6128009 | Ohkura et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130898 | Kostreski et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6131161 | Linnartz | Oct 2000 | A |
6141003 | Chor et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6141385 | Yamaji | Oct 2000 | A |
6141448 | Khansari et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6147714 | Terasawa et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6151059 | Schein et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6157673 | Cuccia | Dec 2000 | A |
6160545 | Eyer et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6160546 | Thompson et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6163316 | Killian | Dec 2000 | A |
6163345 | Noguchi et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6167188 | Young et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6169843 | Lenihan et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172674 | Etheredge | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172677 | Stautner et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6172687 | Kitamura et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6173330 | Guo et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177930 | Chernock et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6177931 | Alexander et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6182287 | Schneidewend et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6188725 | Sugiyama | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6191782 | Mori et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6198478 | Ota et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6201536 | Hendricks et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6208335 | Gordon et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209129 | Carr et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6209130 | Rector, Jr. et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212680 | Tsinberg et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6212860 | Preisner et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6222531 | Smith | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230322 | Saib et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6230324 | Tomita et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6239794 | Yuen et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6240555 | Shoff et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6243142 | Mugura et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6256785 | Klappert et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6259487 | Bril | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6260192 | Rosin et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6262722 | Allison et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6263501 | Schein et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6268849 | Boyer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6288738 | Dureau et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298482 | Seidman et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6305016 | Marshall et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6357043 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6357046 | Thompson et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6359910 | Takahashi | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6385771 | Gordon | May 2002 | B1 |
6388714 | Schein et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6389477 | Simmon et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6401242 | Eyer et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6404818 | Obikane | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6405371 | Oosterhout et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6414970 | Negishi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6415437 | Ludvig et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421067 | Kamen et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6421359 | Bennett et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6425133 | Leary | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6426779 | Noguchi et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6442755 | Lemmons et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6449654 | Blackwell et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453471 | Klosterman | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6456782 | Kubota et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6457010 | Eldering et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6459427 | Mao et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6460018 | Kasai et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6460181 | Donnelly | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6463586 | Jerding | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6469753 | Klosterman et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6470460 | Kashiwagi et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473425 | Bellaton et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6473804 | Kaiser et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6477705 | Yuen et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6481010 | Nishikawa et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6481011 | Lemmons | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6481012 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6487722 | Okura et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6490728 | Kitazato et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6510152 | Gerszberg et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6510555 | Tsurumoto | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6515680 | Hendricks et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6518986 | Mugura | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6519009 | Hanaya et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526577 | Knudson et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6530082 | Del Sesto et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6532590 | Chimoto | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6542518 | Miyazawa | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6567106 | Wugofski | May 2003 | B1 |
6573942 | Crinon | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6577350 | Proehl et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6578201 | LaRocca et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6580441 | Schileru-Key | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6584125 | Katto | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6584153 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6588014 | Hayashi | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6594271 | Wu | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6606746 | Zdepski et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6621870 | Gordon et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6625810 | Murphy et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6637029 | Maissel et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6651252 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6671882 | Murphy et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6675385 | Wang | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6675387 | Boucher et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6681395 | Nishi | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6704028 | Wugofski | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6704359 | Bayrakeri et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6741617 | Rosengren et al. | May 2004 | B2 |
6754905 | Gordon et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6763522 | Kondo et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
6782132 | Fogg | Aug 2004 | B1 |
6791561 | Dawson | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6807528 | Truman et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6828993 | Hendricks et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6874129 | Smith | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6954897 | Noguchi et al. | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6968567 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6999476 | Lerman et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7031348 | Gazit | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7062777 | Alba et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7065709 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7096484 | Mao et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7100185 | Bennington et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7110006 | MacInnis et al. | Sep 2006 | B2 |
7117440 | Gordon et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7134133 | Wugofski | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7137135 | Schein et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7143428 | Bruck et al. | Nov 2006 | B1 |
7150029 | Ebling et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7174084 | Edmonds et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7178158 | Nishina et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7194032 | Easwar et al. | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7343614 | Hendricks et al. | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7359439 | Conover | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7363645 | Hendricks | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7370342 | Ismail et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7404200 | Hailey et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
7503003 | Kamen et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7685619 | Herz | Mar 2010 | B1 |
7836467 | Gordon et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7838467 | Jones et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8032906 | Gordon et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8060905 | Hendricks | Nov 2011 | B1 |
20010005447 | Kawamura et al. | Jun 2001 | A1 |
20010010095 | Ellis et al. | Jul 2001 | A1 |
20010012022 | Smith | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010056577 | Gordon et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020007493 | Butler et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020012353 | Gerszberg et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026496 | Boyer et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020032907 | Daniels | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020035728 | Fries | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020049971 | Augenbraun et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020066102 | Chapman et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020066103 | Gagnon et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020120933 | Knudson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020133565 | Huat | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030020744 | Ellis et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030034982 | Talayssat et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030035007 | Wugofski | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030052905 | Gordon et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030056216 | Wugofski et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030066085 | Boyer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083533 | Gerba et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083936 | Mueller et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030091339 | Isozaki | May 2003 | A1 |
20030115603 | Lemmons et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149988 | Ellis et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030200544 | Ellis et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030209599 | Gatto | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040078824 | Krisbergh et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040107439 | Hassell et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117831 | Ellis et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040128686 | Boyer et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040261105 | Marshall et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050028208 | Ellis et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050278741 | Robarts et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060277581 | Eliyahu et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060282852 | Purpura et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070011702 | Vaysman | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070089135 | Qureshey et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070157247 | Cordray et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20090028153 | Koster et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20100333004 | Kristiansen et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0721253 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0725539 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0758833 | Feb 1997 | EP |
0838958 | Apr 1998 | EP |
0921682 | Jun 1999 | EP |
0946060 | Sep 1999 | EP |
0966164 | Dec 1999 | EP |
01905040 | Apr 2008 | EP |
0124726.1 | Sep 1971 | GB |
2364195 | Jan 2002 | GB |
9-284739 | Oct 1997 | JP |
10-191273 | Jul 1998 | JP |
11-163817 | Jun 1999 | JP |
H08506939 | May 2001 | JP |
2001-519625 | Oct 2001 | JP |
9414280 | Jun 1994 | WO |
9414282 | Jun 1994 | WO |
9430008 | Dec 1994 | WO |
9637059 | Nov 1996 | WO |
9713368 | Apr 1997 | WO |
9746007 | Dec 1997 | WO |
9831116 | Jul 1998 | WO |
9847825 | Oct 1998 | WO |
9853611 | Nov 1998 | WO |
9904561 | Jan 1999 | WO |
0005890 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0005892 | Feb 2000 | WO |
0040013 | Jul 2000 | WO |
0064164 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0064169 | Oct 2000 | WO |
0156290 | Aug 2001 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action in Canadian Application No. 2,680,673 dated May 24, 2011. |
Partial European Search Report for EP 07007019 dated Feb. 7, 2011. |
Partial European Search Report for EP07016891 dated Jul. 5, 2010. |
Examiner's Report in CA 2,680,673 dated Oct. 7, 2010. |
Office Action in Canadian patent application No. 2680673. dated May 24, 2011. |
Office Action in European Patent Application No. 07007019.8, dated Oct. 21, 2011. |
Rule 69 EPC Communication in European Patent Application No. 07016891.9, dated Aug. 9, 2010. |
Freier, Alan 0. et al., “The SSL Protocol Version 3.0,” Mar. 1996, pp. 1-52, Netscape. |
Kaliski. Burton S .. “A Layman's Guide to a Subset of ASN.1, BER and DER,” Nov. 1, 1993, pp. 1-38, RSA Laboratories. |
Malpani, Am Barish et al., “Simple Certificate Validation Protocol (SCVP),” Jul. 2001, pp. 1-23. |
PKCS #7: Cryptographic Message Syntax Standard, Nov. 1993, pp. 1-29, RSA Laboratories. |
Office Action in European Application No. 07016891.9-2202, dated Apr. 21, 2010. |
International Search Report PCT/US99/15522, Oct. 15, 1999. |
International Search Report PCT/US00/10187, Jul. 11, 2000. |
International Search Report PCT/US01/02440, Aug. 2, 2001. |
International Search Report PCT/US97/22850, Oct. 22, 1998. |
International Search Report PCT/US99/16265, Feb. 3, 2000. |
International Search Report PCT/US99/16786, Oct. 18, 1999. |
International Search Report PCT/US99/16764, Oct. 18, 1999. |
International Search Report PCT/US00/10059, Jul. 6, 2000. |
International Preliminary Examination Report PCT/US00/10059, Sep. 30, 2001. |
International Search Report PCT/US00/29806, Jan. 19, 2001. |
International Preliminary Examination Report PCT/US00/29806, Nov. 18, 2001. |
International Search Report PCT/US00/29805, Jan. 22, 2001. |
International Preliminary Examination Report PCT/US00/29805, Nov. 13, 2001. |
International Preliminary Examination Report PCT/US00/10188, May 15, 2001. |
International Preliminary Examination Report PCT/US99/16786, Dec. 18, 2000. |
International Search Report PCT/US00/10188, Jun. 15, 2000. |
British Search and Examination Search report—GB 0124726.1—Aug. 8, 2003. |
International Preliminary Examination Report PCT/US01/02440, Apr. 15, 2003. |
European Search Report EP01963811, Sep. 22, 2005. |
Supplementary European Search Report EP01905040, Feb. 21, 2006. |
International Preliminary Examination Report—PCT/US99/15522—Feb. 17, 2000. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110314500 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10265752 | Oct 2002 | US |
Child | 13221945 | US | |
Parent | 09454216 | Dec 1999 | US |
Child | 10265752 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09428066 | Oct 1999 | US |
Child | 09454216 | US |