Ubiquitous remote access to services, application programs and data has become commonplace as a result of the growth and availability of broadband and wireless network access. Remote access to application programs may be provided using a mobile device connected to a server computer via a computer network. Use of wireless handheld devices such as, for example, IPHONE, ANDROID, and IPAD has rapidly increased over the last couple of years to the extent that now many own at least one wireless handheld device. State of the art wireless mobile technology enables use of small wireless handheld devices to access the Internet and interact with various types of application programs.
Most computer applications used in, for example, large businesses, government organizations, and hospitals are still legacy mainframe computer applications run on a mainframe computer network. The original terminals have been replaced by Personal Computers (PCs) and terminal emulators enabling the PC user to interact with the mainframe computer application. However, to provide mobile devices with remote access to such programs, it is generally required that the source code of the mainframe computer application and/or the terminal emulator is modified in order to create an appropriate interface for the mobile device to interact with the legacy application. This can be expensive, time consuming and difficult to accomplish.
According to an aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method for providing remote access to a legacy application program over a communication network. The method may include determining logical elements of the legacy application program; determining a state model in accordance with the logical elements of the legacy application program, the state model providing an association of logical elements of the legacy application program with corresponding states of the legacy application program; generating a remote access program in accordance with the state model, the remote access program executing on a server computing device; updating the state model in accordance with data received from a user interface program executing on a client computer and in accordance with application data received from the legacy application program; enabling communication between the legacy application program and a client computer; and providing application representation data generated in accordance with the application data to the user interface program to the client computer, the application representation data enabling the client computer to display a visualization of the legacy application program in accordance with information contained in the state model.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided an apparatus for providing remote access to a legacy application over a communication network. The apparatus may include a network interface device that interfaces with the communication network, a memory that stores computer executable instructions, and a processor that executes the computer executable instructions. The instructions may cause the apparatus to determine logical elements of the legacy application program; determine a state model in accordance with the logical elements of the legacy application program, the state model providing an association of logical elements of the legacy application program with corresponding states of the legacy application program; generate a remote access program in accordance with the state model, the remote access program executing on a server computing device; update the state model in accordance with data received from a user interface program executing on a client computer and in accordance with application data received from the legacy application program; enable communication between the legacy application program and a client computer; and provide application representation data generated in accordance with the application data to the user interface program to the client computer, the application representation data enabling the client computer to display a visualization of the legacy application program in accordance with information contained in the state model.
According to another aspect of the present disclosure, there is provided a method for providing remote access to an application program. The method may include determining logical elements of the legacy program, the application program being executed on a first computer connected to the computer network; determining a state model of the legacy application program in accordance with the logical elements; and generating a remote access program at a server computer in accordance with the state model. The remote access program may perform updating the state model in accordance with input data received from a user interface program; generating control data in accordance with the updated state model and providing the control data to the legacy application program; updating the state model in accordance with application data received from the legacy application program; generating application representation data in accordance with the updated state model; and providing the application representation data to the user interface program to provide a visualization of the legacy application program in accordance with information contained in the state model.
Other systems, methods, features and/or advantages will be or may become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following drawings and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and/or advantages be included within this description and be protected by the accompanying claims.
The components in the drawings are not necessarily to scale relative to each other. Like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the several views.
Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosure belongs. As will become evident to those of ordinary skill in the art, methods and materials similar or equivalent to those described herein can be used in the practice or testing of the present disclosure. As will be appreciated from the present disclosure, implementations will be described for enabling remote access to a mainframe application computer program via a computer network absent source code modification of the mainframe computer application and/or the terminal emulator.
Referring to
The server computer 102B may be connected, for example, via the computer network 110 to a Local Area Network (LAN) 109. For example, the LAN 109 may be an internal computer network of an institution such as a hospital, a bank, a large business, or a government department. Typically, such institutions still use a mainframe computer 102A and a database 108 connected to the LAN 109, as these legacy systems provide numerous services to the institution. Numerous application programs are performed, for example, by executing on processor 104A executable commands of the respective application program stored in memory 106A of the mainframe computer 102A. The original terminals connected to the mainframe computer 102A via the LAN 109 and used to interact with the mainframe computer 102A have been replaced with Personal Computers (PCs). Remote access to the application program executed on the mainframe computer 102A is then provided using terminal emulator programs, typically executed on the PCs.
According to some implementations, remote access to the application program using, for example, a handheld wireless device 112A, 112B is provided by executing a remote access program or application on processor 104B of the server computer 102B which is in communication with a respective terminal emulator program executed using, for example, the processor 104B of the server computer 102B. Communication between the client computer 112A or 112B and the server computer 102B may be provided as communication between the remote access program or application and a user interface program or client remote access application via, for example, a wireless computer network, as illustrated in
The user interface program or client remote access application may be performed by executing executable commands on processor 118A, 118B of the client computer 112A, 112B with the commands being stored in memory 120A, 120B of the client computer 112A, 112B, respectively. For example, the user interface program or client remote access application is performed by executing executable commands on processor 118A, 118B of the client computer 112A, 112B with the commands being stored in memory 120A, 120B of the client computer 112A, 112B, respectively. Alternatively, the user interface program or client remote access application is executed on the server computer 102B which is then accessed via an URL by a generic client application such as, for example, a web browser executed on the client computer 112A, 112B. The user interface is implemented using, for example, Hyper Text Markup Language HTML 5.
The remote access program or application may determine control data in accordance with the user input data received from the user interface program or client remote access application and provides the same to the terminal emulator program. The terminal emulator program is in communication with the application program executed on the mainframe computer 102A. Data generated by the application program are then provided via the terminal emulator program as application data to the remote access program or application, which generates application representation data in dependence thereupon and provides the same to the user interface program or client remote access application for display. For example, the remote access program or application and the terminal emulator program are executed using the processor 104B of the server computer 102B connected to the LAN 109 via computer network 110, as illustrated in
The operation of the remote access program or application may be performed in accordance with a state model of the application program, as illustrated in
Table 1, below, illustrates an example section of a state model of an application program for purchasing a ticket. The state model may be represented in an Extensible Markup Language (XML) document. Other representations of the state model are contemplated, such as, but not limited to, a binary file, a data structure, etc. Different states of the application program associated with different screens related to different stages of the ticket purchasing process, such as, for example, main menu, ticket customer entry, etc., are defined, as well as transitions between the different states and the related triggers. For example, for each state one or more “fields” are defined for receiving user input data and displaying the same, as illustrated in Table 1 for the main menu.
Referring to
At 18, the development program then generates the remote access program or application in accordance with the state model, for example, in the form of executable XML commands. At 20, the user interface program or client remote access application is generated to interact with the remote access program or application. The user interface program or client remote access application is generated using standard application tools such as, for example, Microsoft Silverlight. The development program is performed for example, by executing executable commands stored in a storage medium on a processor using, for example, the processor 104B of the server computer 102B. Alternatively, the development is performed using a computer in communication with the server computer 102B via the computer network 110.
In accordance with some implementations, the development program, the remote access program or application and the user interface program or client remote access application are implemented using standard programming tools such as, for example, Extensible Markup Language (XML), Microsoft Foundation Class (MFC) applications, Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), Adobe Flash and Microsoft Silverlight. In accordance with some implementations, communication is enabled using standard communication technologies such as, for example, Hyper Text Transfer Protocol (HTTP), virtual private networks (VPN), and secure socket layers (SSL) which are well known to those skilled in the art. Optionally, the terminal emulator program may be omitted if communication with the application program is enabled using, for example, RDP or MFC applications.
The present disclosure has been described herein with regard to preferred implementations. However, it will be obvious to persons skilled in the art that a number of variations and modifications can be made without departing from the scope of the disclosure as described herein.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/425,496, filed Mar. 21, 2012, and entitled “Method and System for Providing a State Model of an Application Program,” and claims priority to U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/487,598, filed May 18, 2011, and entitled “Method and System for Providing a State Model of an Application Program,” which are each incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4975690 | Torres | Dec 1990 | A |
5345550 | Bloomfield | Sep 1994 | A |
5491800 | Goldsmith et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5555003 | Montgomery et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5742778 | Hao et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5844553 | Hao et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5870759 | Bauer et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5903725 | Colyer | May 1999 | A |
5909545 | Frese, II et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920311 | Anthias | Jul 1999 | A |
5978842 | Noble et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6045048 | Wilz et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6061689 | Chang | May 2000 | A |
6075531 | DeStefano | Jun 2000 | A |
6141698 | Krishnan et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6145098 | Nouri et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6253228 | Ferris et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6343313 | Salesky et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6453334 | Vinson et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6453356 | Sheard et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6570563 | Honda | May 2003 | B1 |
6601233 | Underwood | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6792607 | Burd | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6918113 | Patel et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6938096 | Greschler et al. | Aug 2005 | B1 |
6976077 | Lehew et al. | Dec 2005 | B1 |
7065568 | Bracewell | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7069227 | Lintel, III et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7073059 | Worely, Jr. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7149761 | Cooke et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7167893 | Malone | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7174504 | Tsao | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7181686 | Bahrs | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7240162 | de Vries | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7246063 | James | Jul 2007 | B2 |
7320131 | O'Toole, Jr. | Jan 2008 | B1 |
7343310 | Stender | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7350151 | Nakajima | Mar 2008 | B1 |
7418711 | Lee et al. | Aug 2008 | B1 |
7451196 | de Vries et al. | Nov 2008 | B1 |
7577751 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7620901 | Carpenter et al. | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7647370 | Liu et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7650444 | Dirstine | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7656799 | Samuels et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7703024 | Kautzleben et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7706399 | Janczak | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7725331 | Schurenberg et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7783568 | Fracchia et al. | Aug 2010 | B1 |
7802183 | Essin | Sep 2010 | B1 |
7831919 | Viljoen | Nov 2010 | B1 |
7921078 | McCuller | Apr 2011 | B2 |
7941488 | Goodman et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7966572 | Matthews et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8024523 | de Vries et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8261345 | Hitomi et al. | Sep 2012 | B2 |
8356252 | Raman | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8359591 | de Vries et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8509230 | Vinson et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8527706 | de Vries et al. | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8533103 | Certain et al. | Sep 2013 | B1 |
8572178 | Frazzini et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8606952 | Pasetto et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8607158 | Molander et al. | Dec 2013 | B2 |
8627081 | Grimen et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8910112 | Li et al. | Feb 2014 | B2 |
8667054 | Tahan | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8832260 | Raja et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8924512 | Stoyanov et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9239812 | Berlin | Jan 2016 | B1 |
9686205 | Leitch et al. | Jun 2017 | B2 |
20010033299 | Callaway et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010047393 | Arner | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020032751 | Bharadwaj | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032783 | Tuatini | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020032804 | Hunt | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020092029 | Smith | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030014735 | Achlioptas et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023670 | Walrath | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030055893 | Sato et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030065738 | Yang | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030120324 | Osborn | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030120762 | Yepishin et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030149941 | Tsao | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163514 | Waldschmidt | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030184584 | Vachuska et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030208472 | Pham | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040015842 | Nanivadekar | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040029638 | Hytcheson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039742 | Barsness et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068516 | Lee et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040077347 | Lauber | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103195 | Chalasani et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040103339 | Chalasani et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040106916 | Quaid et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040117804 | Scahill et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040162876 | Kohavi | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040183827 | Putterman et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040236633 | Knauerhase et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040243919 | Muresan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249885 | Petropoulakis et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050005024 | Samuels et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050010871 | Ruthfield et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050021687 | Anastassopoulos et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050050229 | Comeau et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050138631 | Bellotti et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050188046 | Hickman et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050188313 | Matthews et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050190203 | Gery | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050198578 | Agrawala et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216421 | Barry et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050240906 | Kinderknecht et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060004874 | Hutcheson et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060026006 | Hindle | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031377 | Ng et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060031481 | Patrick et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060036770 | Hosn et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060085835 | Istvan et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060101397 | Mercer et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060130069 | Srinivasan et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060231175 | Vondracek et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060236328 | DeWitt | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060258462 | Cheng et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060265689 | Kuznetsov et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060271563 | Angelo et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060288171 | Tsien | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060294418 | Fuchs | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070024645 | Purcell et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070047535 | Varma | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070067754 | Chen et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070079244 | Brugiolo | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070112880 | Yang et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070120763 | De Paepe et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070130292 | Tzruya et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070136677 | Agarwal | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070203944 | Batra et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203990 | Townsley et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070203999 | Townsley et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070208718 | Javid et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070226636 | Carpenter et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070233706 | Farber et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070244990 | Wells | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070256073 | Truong et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070282951 | Selimis et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080016155 | Khalatian | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080134211 | Cui | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080146194 | Yang et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080159175 | Flack | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080183190 | Adcox et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080313282 | Warila et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090044171 | Avadhanula | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090080523 | McDowell | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090089742 | Nagulu et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090119644 | de Vries et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090209239 | Montesdeoca | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090217177 | DeGrazia | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090328032 | Crow et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100061238 | Godbole et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100077058 | Messer | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100131591 | Thomas | May 2010 | A1 |
20100150031 | Allen et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100174773 | Penner et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100205147 | Lee | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100223566 | Holmes et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100223661 | Yang | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100268762 | Pahlavan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100268813 | Pahlavan et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20110138016 | Jung et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110138283 | Marston | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110145863 | Alsina et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110154464 | Agarwal et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110157196 | Nave et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110162062 | Kumar et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110184993 | Chawla et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110213830 | Lopez et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110222442 | Cole et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110223882 | Hellgren | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110246891 | Schubert et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110252152 | Sherry et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110314093 | Sheu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120030275 | Boller et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120084713 | Desai et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120090004 | Jeong | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120133675 | McDowell | May 2012 | A1 |
20120151373 | Kominac et al. | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120154633 | Rodriguez | Jun 2012 | A1 |
20120221792 | de Vries et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120226742 | Momchilov et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120245918 | Overton et al. | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120246225 | Lemire | Sep 2012 | A1 |
20120324032 | Chan | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20120324358 | Jooste | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130007227 | Hitomi et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130013671 | Relan et al. | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130031618 | Momchilov | Jan 2013 | A1 |
20130046815 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130046816 | Thomas et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130054679 | Jooste | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130070740 | Yovin | Mar 2013 | A1 |
20130086156 | McFadzean et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130086652 | Kavantzas et al. | Apr 2013 | A1 |
20130110895 | Valentino | May 2013 | A1 |
20130113833 | Larsson | May 2013 | A1 |
20130117474 | Ajanovic et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130132485 | Thomas et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130138791 | Thomas et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130147845 | Xie et al. | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130159062 | Stiehl | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20130179962 | Arai et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130212483 | Brakensiek et al. | Aug 2013 | A1 |
20130262566 | Stephure et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130290408 | Stephure et al. | Oct 2013 | A1 |
20130346482 | Holmes | Dec 2013 | A1 |
20140136667 | Gonsalves et al. | May 2014 | A1 |
20140240524 | Julia et al. | Aug 2014 | A1 |
20140298420 | Barton et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20150067035 | Sullad et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150067769 | Barton et al. | Mar 2015 | A1 |
20150156133 | Leitch et al. | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150319252 | Momchilov et al. | Nov 2015 | A1 |
20160054897 | Holmes et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160226979 | Lancaster et al. | Aug 2016 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101539932 | Sep 2009 | CN |
101883097 | Nov 2010 | CN |
102129632 | Jul 2011 | CN |
102821413 | Dec 2012 | CN |
0349463 | Jan 1990 | EP |
1422901 | May 2004 | EP |
2007084744 | Mar 1995 | JP |
2002055870 | Feb 2002 | JP |
2004-287758 | Oct 2004 | JP |
2005031807 | Feb 2005 | JP |
2005521946 | Jul 2005 | JP |
2008-099055 | Apr 2008 | JP |
2010-256972 | Nov 2010 | JP |
2295752 | Mar 2007 | RU |
2298287 | Apr 2007 | RU |
2305860 | Sep 2007 | RU |
1998058478 | Dec 1998 | WO |
2001016724 | Mar 2001 | WO |
2002009106 | Jan 2002 | WO |
2003032569 | Apr 2003 | WO |
2003083684 | Oct 2003 | WO |
WO 2009064375 | May 2009 | WO |
2010060206 | Jun 2010 | WO |
2010088768 | Aug 2010 | WO |
2010127327 | Nov 2010 | WO |
2011087545 | Jul 2011 | WO |
2013024342 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013024343 | Feb 2013 | WO |
2013109984 | Jul 2013 | WO |
2013128284 | Sep 2013 | WO |
2013153439 | Oct 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated May 31, 2016, received in connection International Patent Application No. PCT/US2014/064243. |
Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Nov. 16, 2015, received in connection with SG Application No. 2013087150. |
Coffman, Daniel, et al., “A Client-Server Architecture for State-Dependent Dynamic Visualizations on the Web,” IBM T.J. Watson Research Center, 2010, 10 pages. |
Fraser, N., “Differential Synchronization,” Google, Mountain View, CA, Jan. 2009, 8 pages. |
Jourdain, Sebastien, et al., “ParaViewWeb: A Web Framework for 3D Visualization and Data Processing,” International Journal of Computer Information Systems and Industrial Management Applications, vol. 3, 2011, pp. 870-877. |
Microsoft Computer Dictionary, Microsoft Press, 5th Edition, Mar. 15, 2002, p. 624. |
Mitchell, J. Ross, et al., A Smartphone Client-Server Teleradiology System for Primary Diagnosis of Acute Stroke, Journal of Medical Internet Research, vol. 13, Issue 2, 2011, 12 pages. |
ParaViewWeb, KitwarePublic, retrieved on Jan. 27, 2014 from http://www.paraview.org/Wiki/ParaViewWeb, 1 page. |
Remote Desktop Protocol (RDP), retrieved on May 4, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Protocol, 7 pages. |
Remote Desktop Services (RDS), Remote App, retrieved on May 4, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Services, 9 pages. |
Remote Desktop Services (RDS), Windows Desktop Sharing, retrieved on May 4, 2014 from http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Remote_Desktop_Serives, 9 pages. |
Extended European Search Report, dated Jun. 2, 2014, received in connection with European Application No. 12760310.8. |
Extended European Search Report, dated Mar. 3, 2015, received in connection with related European Application No. 09828497.9. |
International Search Report, dated Feb. 19, 2010, in connection with International Application No. PCT/CA2009/001704. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated May 31, 2011, in connection with International Application No. PCT/CA2009/001704. |
International Search Report, dated May 12, 2010, in connection with International Application No. PCT/CA2010/000154. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 9, 2011, in connection with International Application No. PCT/CA2010/000154. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 31, 2012, in connection with International Application No. PCT/IB2012/000562. |
International Search Report, dated Dec. 20, 2012, in connection with International Application No. PCT/IB2012/001589. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 18, 2014, in connection with International Application No. PCT/IB2012/001589. |
International Search Report, dated Dec. 28, 2012, in connection with International Application No. PCT/IB2012/001590. |
International Preliminary Report on Patentability and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 18, 2014, in connection with International Application No. PCT/IB2012/001590. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Aug. 21, 2013, in connection with International Application No. PCT/IB2013/000676. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jul. 31, 2013, in connection with International Application No. PCT/IB2013/000720. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Mar. 19, 2015, received in connection with International Application No. PCT/US2014/064243. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion, dated Jun. 30, 2016, received in connection International Patent Application No. PCT/IB2016/000277. |
“GTK 3, Broadway and an HTML5 websocket gui, for free,” retrieved on Sep. 26, 2017 at http://compsci.ca/v3/viewtopic.php?t=36823, Apr. 12, 2014, pp. 1-3. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150163292 A1 | Jun 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61487598 | May 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13425496 | Mar 2012 | US |
Child | 14609634 | US |