This invention relates to systems for and methods of providing targeted advertising over a distributed content-based system of coordinated content-specific nodes over the Internet.
Targeted advertising has long been a goal of the companies who place and pay for advertisements. Advertisements can be expensive in any medium. Thus, companies generally would like to pay only for advertisements that will be viewed by a group of individuals likely to be interested in that company's goods or services.
Over the Internet, one form of advertisement is a paid placement for a search result in a search engine. In these systems, advertisers may choose to offer a different amount for having an advertisement listed in search results for a specific search term and the search results returned by the search engine will be ranked among the advertisers who offer an amount for a particular search term according to the amount offered. For example, if a consumer searched on a paid listing search engine for “airline tickets,” a list of airlines is generated with corresponding URL listings so that the consumer can click on a listing and go to the website corresponding to that listing. Each advertiser associated with those listings pays the search engine a certain amount of money for every “click-through” to the advertiser's website. The higher an advertiser's name appears on the list of search results, the more likely a user will click-through to that advertiser's provided URL (e.g., it's website). Often, as the cost per click-through for the advertising company increases, the closer that company's listing is to the top of the list of search results.
While the aforementioned existing systems allow for some targeting of advertising money, such systems fail to provide other targeted advertising avenues over the Internet.
These and other drawbacks exist with current systems.
Embodiments of the present invention relate to a system of mapping Internet content areas (content nodes) at various levels with advertising specific to the subject matter of the content node. The system provides a mechanism for allowing advertising users to place advertisements through an interface that allows the advertiser to select at least two different levels of content nodes from a dynamic and editorial controlled hierarchy with the intent of placing advertisements for inclusion in those content nodes. The interface enables an advertiser to bid for placement of the advertisement within a bid-for-placement advertisement system within the content node and allows the advertiser to specify different bid amounts at different levels of specificity. For example, in a system that provides five node levels, the advertiser might bid $0.10 per click through for placement on every content node in the system, $0.12 per click through for placement of its advertisement on one of several second-level nodes, $0.15 per click through for placement of its advertisement on one of several third-level nodes, $0.17 per click through for placement of its advertisement on one of several fourth-level nodes, and $0.25 per click through for placement of its advertisement on one of several fifth-level nodes based on the content of the nodes selected and its nexus to the advertisement being placed. By enabling an advertiser to specify a bid for placement and providing greater specificity at different levels of granularity, the advertiser is able to self-select the most beneficial advertising campaign by monitoring performance of its advertisements at different levels of details. As a result, it can increase or decrease its bid amount at the different levels to provide the most cost-effective advertising system.
The content nodes are then mapped by the system with participating content providers in a manner that gives the viewers of the content nodes a contextual view of advertisements. The system stores and maintains the relationships an advertiser has mapped between content nodes and advertisements.
In one embodiment of the present invention, the system maps requests for placement from advertisers into a hierarchy of content nodes in an increasing level of targeting from a general level down to a specific web page, depending on the selections by the advertiser. Content nodes may be specific Internet content or any grouping of such content, including web pages, newsletters, chat, newsgroups, or any derivative of such. Content nodes may have Titles, Descriptions, Depth Levels, Rules, and possible relationships with other content nodes as either a parent or a child depending on the depth.
The Title of the content node may be a short descriptor meant to identify the type of information or communications the content area contains. Conceptually the titles of any parent nodes may also be part of the node title descriptor. For example, a content node with a title of “Vitamins” under a parent content node of “Pets” is different from a content node with a title of “Vitamins” under a parent node of “Health.” In a preferred embodiment, the titles may be shorthanded in a directory-like nomenclature, such as “Pets/Vitamins” and “Health/Vitamins.”
The description of the content node is a long descriptor meant to aid in identifying to the advertiser the specifics of where an ad listing mapped to that content node might appear.
As the depth level of a content node increases, so does the targeting of interests of the user audience. By convention, given depths are referenced with specific names but the nomenclature and number of depths with specific names is variable and defined by the specifics and granularity of content available from distributors.
Rules may be understood to be an abstraction of any business rules that might apply to mapping an ad listing to that given content node. For example, for a newsletter content node, the system may implement a rule requiring an advertiser to have at least $2000 in their account to list an ad on that newsletter content node. Rules may also enforce minimum purchase prices, such as $0.05 per click, if sold on a cost per click. Rules may also allow for inheritance from parent nodes. For example, a given content node may not be allowed to be mapped on a cost per click that is less than or equal to the cost per click on the parent node.
A content node has definable relationships to other content nodes: whether it has a parent, children, or sibling content nodes. It is worth noting that content nodes at the same depth may have different sets of relationships. For example, two sibling content nodes (content nodes with the same parent content node) may or may not independently have children. Note this can and will make for possible asymmetrical content node hierarchies.
Conceptually, a top-level root content node exists which simply translates into a generic request for placement that is not targeted to any specific Internet content other than language (i.e., English language). The top-level node allows advertisers to target a generic audience on the Internet. Ad listings mapped at the top level may appear on the homepage of sites such as msn.com, yahoo.com, and about.com at the same time. Top-level content nodes have no parent.
A channel level node may be understood to be a targeted, but somewhat general, content area. It is used in content areas where the most rudimentary interest is known but not the specifics of it. An example of a channel level node may be “Parenting & Family.” In this case the content area indicates a user has a general interest in parenting or family but no more is known. Channel level content nodes have a top level node, and may further have sibling nodes and child nodes.
A subject matter level node may be understood to be a targeted content area. It is used in Internet content areas where a specific interest is known. An example of a subject matter level node is “Parenting & Family/Pregnancy & Birth” where “Pregnancy & Birth” is the title of the subject matter level node and “Parenting & Family” is the title of the parent, channel level node. In this case, the content on the subject matter level node is designed for users who have a specific interest in “Pregnancy & Birth.” An advertiser mapping to this content node may desire to place an advertisement on the subject matter level content node to be viewed by end users accessing that subject matter level content node. Subject matter level content nodes have a parent node and may also have sibling nodes and child nodes.
A document level node is defined as the most targeted of content units in this embodiment. The document level is used in targeting a specific piece of content that is truly unique. An example of a document level content node is targeted to a specific URL, or a specific newsletter mailing only. An example of a document level node is “Parenting & Family/Pregnancy & Birth/Breastfeeding” where “Breastfeeding” is the actual title of the document level content node, “Pregnancy & Birth” is the actual title of the of the parent, subject matter content node, and “Parenting & Family” is the title of the channel level content node. An advertiser mapping to this content node might desire advertising on the Breastfeeding pages contained at pregnancy.about.com site, as an example. Document level content nodes may be such that they do not have children, but may have siblings or parents.
Clearly, in other embodiments, there may be additional levels of nodes with additional specificity regarding the content. This system which allows for placement of advertisements over nodes with varying levels of content specificity enables an advertiser to offer a higher amount for advertisements where the audience is likely to be persons interested in purchases the goods or services advertised. Additionally, the advertiser may also place an advertisement where the content is more tangentially related to the goods and services being offered, and thus less likely to generate sales. This allows the advertiser more flexibility in offering to place advertisements, which enables the advertiser to more specifically target its audience. Generally, the more an advertisement is targeted to viewers likely to become buyers, the more value the advertiser gets for its advertising dollar. The present invention also has the advantage of allowing the advertiser to disseminate its advertisements broadly, or without targeting. The advertiser may offer a lower amount for this untargeted advertising, though, since it is less likely to generate sales.
An Internet advertising system for receiving advertisement information from advertisers for publication through a multi-node hierarchical content-based system, the Internet advertising system has an interactive database server that receives advertisement listing information from a plurality of advertiser user systems connecting to the Internet advertising system over the Internet, the advertisement listing information comprising an advertisement title and URL, a selection of one or more node levels with which the advertisement listing information is to be associated, and a bid amount for each node level selected, a database that stores the advertisement listings, and a network file server that delivers web page content and advertisement listings to a plurality of end users requesting nodes in the multi-node hierarchical system, the content and advertisement listings delivered being based on the node selected by an end user. The URL provided may specify the target web page to be delivered to the end user upon selection of the advertising listing from the web page delivered to the end user. A network file server may deliver advertisement listings for a specific requested node and may do so based on a ranking of advertisement listings associated with the particular node as well as the advertising listings for higher-level nodes. To maintain quality control and ensure some relationship between the advertisement listing and the node with which an advertiser seeks to have it associated, the system may further provide a set of rules applicable to the Internet advertising system to be applied by a rule checking module that determines whether the offered advertisement complies with the set of rules, and if not, provides that information to a denial transmission module that transmits a refusal to any desired advertisement that fails to comply with the set of rules.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate various embodiments of the invention and, together with the description, serve to explain the principles and advantages of the invention.
An advertising system is provided that allows an advertiser to place different bid amounts at different levels of a multi-level hierarchical structure of content specific nodes. This advertising system enables an advertiser to customize its bidding and expenditures within a content-based system, although the user may bid on keyword-based advertising as well, as explained below. For purposes of context, an example of a hierarchical structure of content nodes is depicted in
According to the embodiment depicted in
After selecting a top level node 100, and based upon that selection, the user who wishes to more specifically target its audience on one or more content nodes may choose channel level nodes 110 which specify further the subject matter of the desired listing. For example, the advertiser that sells basketballs may choose the channel level node 110 of Sports from among channel level nodes 110 of Sports, Health, Entertainment, and Religion because ads for basketballs on pages with Sports content are more likely to be relevant to viewers of those pages than to viewers of pages with Religion content. The advertiser may also desire to list its ad in Health as well, in order to be seen by recreational basketball players. Although, the advertiser may judge that an ad placed with Health content is likely to draw fewer viewers to click-through. So the advertiser may offer a smaller amount to place an ad on a page with Health content than the amount the advertiser offered for placement on a page with Sports content.
Furthermore, after selecting a channel level node 110 and based upon that selection, the advertiser who wishes to further target its audience using coordinated content-specific nodes may choose a subject level node 120 which specifies further the subject matter of the desired listing and even further, a document level node 130. For example, the advertiser that sells basketballs may choose a subject level node 120 of Basketball from among subject level nodes 120 of Football, Baseball, Basketball, and Soccer. Moreover, the advertiser may further target its audience by choosing a document level node 130 of Equipment from among document level nodes 130 of NBA, WNBA, NCAA, Rules, Statistics, and Equipment. Accordingly, the advertiser may offer a higher amount for placement as the first listing on the Equipment document level node than on the Rules document level node because the advertiser may judge that a user viewing content related to basketball equipment is more likely to be interested in purchasing basketballs than a user viewing content related to the rules of basketball.
Also, the advertiser may desire the first placement on all document level nodes 130 with a subject level node 120 of Basketball. The advertiser may place an offer for that subject level node according to an embodiment of the present invention. Thus, an advertising system is provided that allows an advertiser to place different bid amounts at different levels of a multi-level hierarchical content-based system.
According to the embodiment of the invention illustrated in
For example, if the advertiser who wishes to sell basketballs places the highest amount as an offer for ad placement on the Equipment document level node 130, the Basketball subject level node 120, the Sports channel level node 110, and the English language top level node 100, the listing may be stored as “English\Sports\Basketball\Equipment\1” in a database (e.g., relational database). The advertiser may select the subject matter, or node, levels shown in
In addition to providing a secure method of gaining access, the advertisement system may also allow an advertiser to offer to pay an amount for placement of an ad when an end user enters certain, enumerated search terms through a search feature of the multi-node hierarchical content-based system. This step may be in addition to placing an ad using the content-based hierarchical system of nodes.
The advertisement system may also allow an advertiser to verify an ad listing entered and its corresponding amount offered in a confirmation step. This step may be in addition to placing an ad using the content-based hierarchical system of nodes. This step may also allow the advertiser to see how the amount offered compares with amounts offered by other advertisers.
Subsequently, the advertisement system may allow an advertiser to choose a high level subject matter where the advertiser would like to have an ad appear on pages with content on that general subject matter.
Furthermore, the advertisement system may allow an advertiser to select a narrower subject matter where the advertiser would like to have an ad appear on pages with content on that same subject matter.
Moreover, the advertisement system may allow an advertiser to select a still narrower subject matter where the advertiser would like to have an ad appear on pages with content on that same subject matter.
Once the advertisement system has allowed an advertiser to sufficiently define at least one node within a hierarchical subject matter structure where the advertiser seeks to place ads, the system may allow the advertiser to verify that hierarchical subject matter structure.
Additionally, the advertisement system may allow an advertiser to enter information detailing the items of information to be placed in ads the advertiser is attempting to list on the advertisement system.
Furthermore, the advertisement system may enable the advertiser to check the items of information entered thus far for accuracy, or otherwise give the advertiser an opportunity to adjust the hierarchical structure, or the amount offered on any given listing entered prior to this step.
Also, the advertisement system may obtain and store information on an advertiser attempting to place an ad on the system.
Similarly, the advertisement system may allow an advertiser to store a means of payment or other such billing information, as a means for the advertisement system to receive payment.
Moreover, the advertisement system may enable an advertiser to view and edit, if desired, any information thus far sent to the advertisement system. Accordingly,
It should be appreciated that the advertiser may place multiple advertisements, may similar or identical advertisements on many different nodes within the system and may thus be provided the opportunity to run analyses to determine the most cost-effective advertising combination within the multi-node hierarchical system. It may be found, for example, that a $0.10 per click-through bid at channel level node and a $0.50 bid on one specific document level node produces the most hits to the advertisements and/or the most revenue from the hits.
To appreciate how the advertisements thus placed may be distributed,
When an advertiser system 1410 offers an amount for an ad listing, that offer may be stored in the Content Object Table Database 1435. Periodically, the Network File Server 1440 accesses the ads stored in the Content Object Table Database 1435 via the Database Server 1425 and writes them to the Structured Content Database 1465.
Additionally, multiple end users 1445 may connect via the Internet to various distribution partners to the multi-node hierarchical content-based system's content. For example, the multi-node hierarchical content-based system may be presented as a web site, such as the assignee of the present invention, About.com at www.about.com. Also, various partners of the host system may engage the host for purposes of providing some or all of the content on their web sites. For example, a web site about Women's issues may desire to distribute the subject level node(s) related to women's issues. The advertisements associated with those nodes may then be delivered along with the content for those nodes through the distribution partner to the end user over the Internet.
A load balancer 1450 may monitor the multiple internet connections, including requests to the server from one or more distribution partners. Via a web server, these multiple users may look for the content from the multi-node hierarchical content-based system. These multiple users 1445 may look for documents using the hierarchical node structure or by inputting search key words. In either case, the Network file server 1440 may read these requests 1455 and provide pages with related content along with the listings associated with that document. Thus the advertisement system illustrated in
Once the advertisement system has accepted offers for placement of ads on a particular node, the advertisement system may publish those ads to the content specific node. For example, those ad listings may be published to a website, as mentioned above. For example, a document-level node may contain a single web page with informational content, links, graphics, chat, and other features related to the subject level, channel level and top level. Within that web page, some or all of the advertisers who placed ads for that level of specificity may be displayed.
The URL for the document level node may be displayed at URL section 1510. This URL may be unique for each content based node, and may also be represented in a relational directory format. In the example shown in
In addition to receiving the content 1550 on the subject matter of the document level node, the viewer has also received three ad listings, 1570, 1580 and 1590. An advertiser who wishes to sell B-P pumps has bid the highest amount for placement on this node. Therefore, that advertiser's listing is listed first. The ad listing may include a Title 1555, “B-P breast pumps for sale”; a Description 1560, “Purchase now . . . limited time offer on B-P breast pumps”; and a Display URL 1565, “www.b-p.com\modelB.” The display URL may show the viewer where they will be redirected if they click on the ad listing. In this example, the advertiser wishing to sell B-P breast pumps may have offered 12 cents per click-through for placement on this node. Whereas, the ad listings in positions 2 and 3, 1580 and 1590 have offered less. While the advertiser of B-P breast pumps may be willing to offer more for number one placement on this particular node because the viewers are likely to become customers, the advertiser may desire placement on tangentially related nodes and not be willing to offer an amount as high for that placement.
For example, with the present invention the same advertiser may offer to place the same ad listing on a node with content related to getting pregnant for a smaller amount than he offered for listing on the node with content related to breastfeeding.
In addition to receiving the content 1650 on the subject matter of getting pregnant, the viewer has also received three ad listings, 1670, 1680 and 1690. The advertiser who wishes to sell B-P pumps has bid three cents per click-through for placement on this node. Three cents per click-through is not the highest amount offered for placement on this node. Therefore, the B-P breast pump listing 1690 is not listed first. The ad listings in positions 1 and 2, 1670 and 1680 have offered less.
Thus, the advertisement system has enabled an advertiser to offer an amount for placing an advertisement on pages with certain content, which may be different from an amount offered for placing the same advertisement on pages with other subject matter content. This allows an advertiser to spend their advertising money on being seen by the viewers who are most likely to become purchasers. This is advantageous to the advertiser because it will allow diversification of advertising and more appropriate pricing. The advertisement system will allow more advertisers to have the highest rank on the pages that are most relevant to their sales. Therefore, the ads will be seen by more potential buyers, and less likely to be seen by viewers uninterested in the goods and services being advertised, and thus the advertisement system of the present invention may offer higher sales for the advertiser for the same amount of money spent on advertising with pre-existing systems.
While the foregoing description includes details and specificities, it should be understood that such details and specificities have been included for the purposes of explanation only, and are not to be interpreted as limitations of the present invention. Many modifications to the embodiments described above can be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention, as it is intended to be encompassed by the following claims and their legal equivalents.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/309,332, filed on Dec. 4, 2002, which claims priority from a provisional patent application filed on Jul. 16, 2002, entitled “Method and system for providing advertising through content specific nodes over the Internet” and having U.S. Application No. 60/396,003, still pending. These disclosures are expressly incorporated herein by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3261361 | Power | Jul 1966 | A |
5636346 | Saxe | Jun 1997 | A |
5724521 | Dedrick | Mar 1998 | A |
5845265 | Woolston | Dec 1998 | A |
5918010 | Appleman et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920854 | Kirsch et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5931901 | Wolfe et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5948061 | Merriman et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960409 | Wexler | Sep 1999 | A |
5974398 | Hanson et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6026368 | Brown et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044375 | Shmueli et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6061659 | Murray | May 2000 | A |
6067570 | Kreynin et al. | May 2000 | A |
6078866 | Buck et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6223163 | Van | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6230170 | Zellweger et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6247009 | Shiiyama et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6253189 | Feezell et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6269361 | Davis et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6285987 | Roth et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6298348 | Eldering | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6324519 | Eldering | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6336132 | Appleman et al. | Jan 2002 | B2 |
6421675 | Ryan et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
7035812 | Meisel et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7062453 | Clarke | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7225151 | Konia | May 2007 | B1 |
20010042064 | Davis et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010047297 | Wen | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010051911 | Marks et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020002509 | Wagorn et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020002525 | Arai et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020026359 | Long et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020035536 | Gellman | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020038282 | Montgomery | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020046099 | Frengut et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020046104 | Kaddeche et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020077891 | Castle et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020099605 | Weitzman et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020103698 | Cantrell | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020111898 | Numaoka et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020120505 | Henkin et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020123988 | Dean et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020165773 | Natsuno et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184097 | Hijiri et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194062 | Linde | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020198780 | Kawakami et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030023489 | McGuire et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030033292 | Meisel et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030037334 | Khoo et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030046161 | Kamangar et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030055729 | Bezos et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030070167 | Holtz et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030083937 | Hasegawa et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030149618 | Sender et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163372 | Kolsy | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030216963 | Ishiwaka et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040015397 | Barry et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040019523 | Barry et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030741 | Wolton et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040044571 | Bronnimann et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054577 | Inoue et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040054589 | Nicholas et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059708 | Dean et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040059712 | Dean et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040093327 | Anderson et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040093620 | Iino et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040119740 | Chang et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040143499 | Dietsch et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040143843 | Khoo et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040167928 | Anderson et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040249709 | Donovan et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050065806 | Harik | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050071224 | Fikes et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050096979 | Koningstein | May 2005 | A1 |
20050131758 | Desikan et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050131762 | Bharat et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050144069 | Wiseman et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050216335 | Fikes et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050222900 | Fuloria et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222903 | Buchheit et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050222989 | Haveliwala et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050223002 | Agarwal et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1026610 | Aug 2000 | EP |
11212999 | Aug 1999 | JP |
2001306441 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2001306576 | Nov 2001 | JP |
2002132830 | May 2002 | JP |
2002189691 | Jul 2002 | JP |
2002189744 | Jul 2002 | JP |
WO 0038074 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0038074 | Jun 2000 | WO |
WO0113273 | Feb 2001 | WO |
WO0115053 | Mar 2001 | WO |
WO0133315 | May 2001 | WO |
WO2004042525 | May 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
epilot1, http://webarchive.org/web/20020402035137/http://epilot.com/searchbox/faqs/general.asp, dated Apr. 2, 2002. |
epilot2, http://webarchive.org/web/20011124163351/http://epilot.com/searchbox/faqs/technical.asp, dated Nov. 12, 2001. |
epilot3, Businesswire, “Epilot delivers cash incentives for browsing the internet; unique desktop portal provides unlimited revenue opportunities and simplified internet browsing”, dataed Dec. 7, 1999. |
Official Action for International Application No. 2005-505130, mailed Jun. 28, 2011, 9 pages. |
Sprinks 1, PR Newswire, “About.com Adds Auction-Based Advertising to Platform”, Apr. 10, 2000. |
Sprinks 2, PR Newswire, “About, Inc. Announces Sprinks Distribution with Ask Jeeves; Deal Demonstrates Success of Sprinks in Search Infrastructure” Sep. 11, 2000. |
Sprinks 3, Business Wire, “Did-it.com Releases Suite of Solutions to Increase the Efficiency of Pay-Per-Click (PPC) Search Engines”, May 1, 2001. |
Sprinks 4, Patricia Riedman, “Advertorial seeps into search sites”, Advertising Age, Feb. 19, 2001. |
Sprinks 5, http://web.archive.org/web/20001109072000/personalweb.about.com/- internet/personalweb/, dated Nov. 9, 2000. |
Sprinks 6, http://web.archive.org/web/20010405212739/sprinks.about.com/ad.s- ub.--intercept,html, dated Apr. 5, 2001. |
Sprinks 7, http://web.archive.org/web/20010119180600/sprinks.about.com/, dated Jan. 19, 2001. |
Sprinks 8, http://web.archive.org/web/20010119181200/http://www.sprinks.com- , dated Jan. 19, 2001. |
Sprinks 9, “About.com unveils sponsored links on verticle sites,” Adweek, dated Apr. 10, 2000. |
Sprinks 10, “About.com adds auction-based advertising to platform,” PR Newswire, Dated Apr. 10, 2000. |
Sprinks 11, http://webarchive.org/web/200100331040103/sprinks.about.com/professional.- sub.--advertising.html. dated Mar. 31, 2001. |
Sprinks 12, http://webarchive.org/web/20010331041946/sprinks.about.com/targeted.sub.-- -audiances.html, dated Mar. 31, 2001. |
Notice of Reason for Rejection for International Application No. 2005-505130, mailed Jan. 20, 2009, 26 pages. |
Sprinks 14, http://web.archive.org/web/20010331030637/sprinks.about.com/how.sub.--it.- sub.--works.html, dated Mar. 31, 2001. |
Sprinks 15, http://web.archive.org/web/20010331023508/sprinks.about.com/ad.- sub.--intercept.html, dated Mar. 31, 2001. |
Sprinks 16, http://web.archive.org/web/20010331025328/sprinks.about.com/faq.htm, dated Mar. 31, 2001. |
Sprinks 17, “About, Inc. Announces Sprinks Distribution with Ask Jeeves; Deal Demonstrates Success of Sprinks in Search Infrastructure.”, PRNewswire, Sep. 11, 2000. |
Sprinks 18, Mack, Ann, “About.com unveils sponsored links on verticle sites”, Adweek, Apr. 2000. |
Google Introduces New Pricing for Popular Self-Service Online Advertising Program, http://www.google.com/press/pressrel/select.html, p. 1-2, printed on Jul. 29, 2003. |
Search Overview, http://www.content.overture.com/d/Usm/about/news/searchoverview.jhtml, p. 1-3, printed on Jul. 29, 2003. |
Collection of papers from findwhat.com, http://www.findwhat.com/index.asp, printed on Jul. 29, 2003. |
Collection of papers from Sprinks.com, http://www.sprinks.com, printed on Jul. 29, 2003. |
Collection of papers from Kandoodle.com, http://www.kanoodle.com/about/about.cool, printed on Jul. 29, 2003. |
Collection of papers from Google Advertising, http://www.google.com/ads/, printed on Jul. 29, 2003. |
Chris Sherman, “Google Launches AdWords Select,” Feb. 20, 2002, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20100332321 A1 | Dec 2010 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60396003 | Jul 2002 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10309332 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 12823651 | US |