Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is a call control signaling protocol for Internet Protocol (IP) networks. SIP is designed to be device-agnostic—that is, it is intended to provide a highly flexible call signaling capability that is not tailored to the capabilities of any particular device. Analog telephone signaling, on the other hand, is device-specific and highly constrained because of the historical legacy of the services delivered to the device. As a result, many call features available in traditional analog telephone devices are not easily integrated in a packet switched and/or packet-based network such as a SIP-based network.
In order to facilitate a fuller understanding of the exemplary embodiments of the present inventions, reference is now made to the appended drawings. These drawings should not be construed as limiting, but are intended to be exemplary only.
A system and process of an exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides call screening in packet-switched and/or packet-based networks.
SIP Device 110 may represent a device that manages User Interface 114. User Interface 114 may include a traditional telephone and other data communication device using voiceband or other signaling, including but not limited to data modems, facsimile devices, teletype (TTY) equipment, etc. SIP Device 110 may contain SIP User Agent 112. SIP User Agent 112 may be integrated with SIP Device 110 or remote from SIP Device 110. SIP User Agent 112 may perform interworking between SIP signaling and user interface actions. For example, SIP User Agent 112 may manage an exchange of media (e.g., audio, etc.) between User Interface 114 and a Real Time Protocol (RTP) media stream of a media session set up by the SIP signaling. SIP Device 110 may originate calls to and receive calls from other users. SIP Device 110 may communicate through IP Network 120 to SIP Server 122.
SIP Server 122 may represent a SIP proxy or application server that acts on behalf of SIP Device 110. For example, SIP Server 122 may manage a SIP Address of Record (AOR) on behalf of SIP Device 110. SIP Device 110 may register with SIP Server 122 and send SIP signaling through SIP Server 122 to other SIP elements, such as SIP Element 130 and SIP Element 132. For example, a call to the SIP AOR may be delivered to SIP Server 122, which in turn delivers the call to SIP Device 110. SIP Server 122 may perform some service on behalf of SIP Device 110, or may simply forward SIP messages to and from SIP Device 110. SIP Device 110 communicates through IP Network 124 to SIP Element 130 and/or SIP Element 132.
SIP Element 130 and SIP Element 132 may represent users with which the user of SIP Device 110 communicates. SIP Element may be a SIP Device, SIP Server, and/or other SIP enabled device. In addition, SIP Element may also represent a PSTN device that may be reached by a gateway that, directly or indirectly, acts as a SIP User Agent.
As shown in
The various components of systems 200 and 300 as shown in
Application server 401 may include network elements (not shown in
According to various embodiments, device 402 may be an instrument through which an end user may connect to network 404 to send and receive calls and avail the end user of services (e.g., a collection of behaviors to be applied to communications requests on behalf of an end user) that may be provided. Device 402 may include a user agent 420. User agent 420 may include a subscriber module 421, an interpreter 422 a refer module 423 and an invite module 424. In an exemplary embodiment, subscriber module 421, interpreter 422, refer module 423 and invite module 424 may comprise a single module to receive and transmit SUBSCRIBE, NOTIFY, REFER and INVITE requests to enable call screening, for example. In an exemplary embodiment, user agent 420 may be a SIP construct that represents a device in a SIP-based network, for example. In such an embodiment, user agent 420 may be coupled with a network and a user interface, as shown in
User interface 403 may provide a facility through which a user interacts with the user interface in order to initiate and receive voice communications. In an exemplary embodiment, user interface 403 may be a telephone or like device. Also, user interface 403 may include a computer emulating a telephone, for example. As shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, DTMF signal generator 431 may include twelve DTMF keys or a rotary dial similar to those on conventional telephones. In such an embodiment, a user may press the DTMF keys or move the rotary dial, respectively, to generate DTMF signals. Also, DTMF signal generator 431 may include a computer emulating twelve DTMF keys. In such an embodiment, a user may interact with the computer to generate DTMF signals.
Audio transceiver 432 may provide a facility to transmit and receive audio signals. In an exemplary embodiment, audio transceiver may include a microphone, earphone, speaker, and/or the like.
Display 433 may display verbal and/or graphical messages to the user. For example, display 403 may display the phrase “Screen Call?” to a user to invite the user to screen a call that is being forwarded. Also, display 403 may serve as a caller identification display, capable of displaying the name and number associated with an incoming call.
Communications module 434 may provide a facility to communicate with device 402 and/or user agent 420. Communications module 434 may include an analog telephone port, a wireless port, or any other means for coupling user interface 403 with device 402 and/or user agent 420, for example.
Hookswitch control 435 may perform the functions of a traditional hookswitch, which may include, e.g., initiating a call, terminating a call, and accessing a service within a call (e.g., the function of a “flash” button). For example, hookswitch control 435 may be used to request that a forwarded call be screened, a screening party conference into the call, and/or that forwarded destination be ejected from a conferenced call as will be described in greater detail below.
Indicators 436 may provide indications to the user regarding the services provided. For example, indicators 436 may provide a message waiting indicator, an indication that a service (e.g., call forwarding) is active or inactive, or the like. Indicators 436 may include indicator lights, for example, and/or graphical representations that may appear on the display.
As noted above, subscribe/notify module 410 and subscriber module 421 may receive and transmit SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY requests. In an exemplary embodiment, the modules may receive and transmit SUBSCRIBE and NOTIFY requests in accordance with the Internet Engineering Task Force's (IETF) Request for Comment (RFC) No. 3265 entitled “SIP-Specific Event Notification,” the contents of which is incorporated herein by reference. In such an embodiment, the user agent may subscribe to services for various resources or calls in the network, for example, thus enabling the user agent to receive notifications regarding the service. For example, the user agent may subscribe to a “call-forwarding-indicator” service to receive a notification when the status of the call forwarding service changes and/or a “call-redirection-reminder” service to receive a notification when a call is forwarded.
According to this exemplary SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY capability, a subscriber may be a user agent that receives NOTIFY requests from notifiers (e.g., an application server). The NOTIFY request may contain information about the state of a resource and/or service in which the subscriber is interested. A subscriber may generate SUBSCRIBE requests and transmit the SUBSCRIBE requests to create subscriptions. A notifier may generate notification requests for the purpose of notifying subscribers of the state of a resource and/or service. A notifier may also accept SUBSCRIBE requests to create subscriptions. An event package may refer to an specification that defines a set of state information to be reported by a notifier to a subscriber.
In an exemplary embodiment, SUBSCRIBE requests may include an “Event” header and an “Accept” header, for example. In such an embodiment, the “Event” header may indicate which event or class of events to which the subscriber is subscribing. Also, the “Event” header may include a token which indicates the type of state for which a subscription is being requested. An “Accept” header may indicate the body formats allowed in subsequent NOTIFY requests.
SUBSCRIBE requests may be a dialog-creating method. For example, when a subscriber wishes to subscribe to a particular service, the subscriber may form and transmit a SUBSCRIBE message. This SUBSCRIBE request may then be confirmed with a final response in the form of a NOTIFY request, for example.
In an exemplary embodiment, NOTIFY requests and/or messages may be sent to inform subscribers of changes in state to which the subscriber has a subscription. In such an embodiment, a NOTIFY may not terminate the corresponding subscription. NOTIFY requests may contain “Event” headers that may contain an event package name for which a notification is being generated, for example. The “Event” package name may correspond to the “Event” header in the corresponding SUBSCRIBE message. NOTIFY requests may also contain “Content-Type” headers which may indicate a body format, and may also contain bodies that may contain the state of the subscribed resource and/or service.
In addition to the SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY capabilities, refer module 411 of application server 401 and refer module 423 of user agent 420 may receive and transmit REFER requests. In an exemplary embodiment, the modules may receive an transmit REFER requests in accordance with IETF RFC No. 3515 entitled “The SIP Refer Method,” the contents of which is incorporated herein by reference.
In such an embodiment, a user agent, for example, may request that the recipient of the REFER request REFER to a resource provided in the request. The REFER request may enable the transmitting party to be notified of the outcome of the referenced request, as well.
In an exemplary embodiment, REFER may indicate that the recipient (identified by a request Uniform Resource Indicator (URI)) should contact a third party using the contact information provided. For example, an original or intended destination of a call may transmit a REFER request to a server to request that the server contact a forwarded destination to enable the original destination to screen a call as will be discussed in greater detail below. A REFER request may contain a “Refer-to” header field to identify the third-party to be contacted.
As noted above, invite module 412 of application server 401 and invite module 424 of user agent 420 may transmit and receive INVITE requests to create a dialog between the user agent and the server, for example. In an exemplary embodiment, other elements in an exemplary system for call screening (e.g., a caller and a forwarded destination) may contain invite modules to create dialogs between the server and the caller and the forwarded destination. In an exemplary embodiment, INVITE requests may be used to create dialogs between elements in a system for call screening as will be described in greater detail below.
Various embodiments provide for call screening in a packet-switched network. In these embodiments, the screening party (e.g., an original destination) may also conference into the forwarded call and/or eject the forwarded destination from the call, for example.
In the exemplary embodiment of
In such an embodiment, server 501 may provide a call forwarding service on behalf of original destination 503. When call forwarding is active, if server 501 receives an INVITE request from caller 502, for example, it may not send an INVITE request to original destination 503. Instead, server 501 may send an INVITE request to forwarded destination 504. Server 501 may then interconnect the two dialogs to allow all audio data to be exchanged between caller 502 and forwarded destination 504. Also, if original destination 503 has configured the call forwarding service to forward calls after an interval of time passes before the original destination 503 answers the call, server 501 may cancel an INVITE request sent to original destination 503 and forward the call to forwarded destination 504. For example, if original destination 503 does not answer a call after a predetermined number of rings, server 501 may forward the call to forwarded destination 504, which may be a voice mail box and/or voice mail system.
In an exemplary embodiment, system 500 may support a call screening service that may allow the original destination 503 to listen in on a call that has been forwarded to forwarded destination 504. In such an embodiment, server 501 may send notification to original destination 503 when server 501 has forwarded a call to forwarded destination 504, for example. To receive this notification, original destination 503 may subscribe to a “Forwarded Call Event” service in accordance with the SUBSCRIBE/NOTIFY capability described above. For example, the user agent of original destination 503 may transmit a SUBSCRIBE request to server 501 to subscribe to the service.
In block 601, an originating destination (e.g., subscriber) may subscribe to a forwarded call event service associated with call forwarding as described above. For example, a user agent associated with an original destination may submit a SUBSCRIBE request to a server, such as an application server or SIP server, and the server may confirm the subscription as described above. The forwarded call event service may enable the original destination to receive notification of a forwarded call and screen the forwarded call. The user agent of the original destination may be pre-programmed to submit such a SUBSCRIBE request, or may receive configuration information or other instructions which instruct the user agent to submit such a SUBSCRIBE request. The server associated with the original destination may also authenticate and/or authorize the SUBSCRIBE request prior to enabling the call screening service.
In block 602, original destination may be called by a caller, for example. In an exemplary embodiment, a caller may transmit an INVITE request to a server to create a dialog between the caller and the server.
In block 603, the server may determine whether call forwarding is active for the original destination. For example, prior to receiving the call, a user associated with the original destination may use a user interface to activate the call forwarding service for the original destination. If call forwarding is not active, in block 604, the server may connect the caller with the original destination, for example, by transmitting an INVITE request to the original destination to create a dialog between the server and the original destination. The server may then interconnect the dialogs the server has with the caller and the original destination to enable an exchange of audio data between the caller and the original destination, for example.
If call forwarding is active, in block 605, the call may be forwarded to the forwarded destination. To forward the call to the forwarded destination, the server may transmit an INVITE request to the forwarded destination to create a dialog between the server and the forwarded destination. The server may then interconnect the dialogs the server has with the caller and the forwarded destination to enable an exchange of audio data between the caller and the forwarded destination, for example.
In block 606, the original destination may be notified of the forwarded call. In an exemplary embodiment the original destination may receive a notification of the forwarded call because the original destination has subscribed to the Forwarded Call Event server in block 601, for example. To notify the original destination of the forwarded call, the server may construct a Forwarded Call Event that may include an identifier of the dialog between the caller and the server, the address of record for the forwarded destination, and a time limit defining the time for allowing the original destination to screen the call. The server may then transmit the Forwarded Call Event in a NOTIFY request to the original destination, where it is received by the user agent associated with the original destination.
In block 607, it may be determined whether the original destination has gone “offhook” before a predetermined period of time expires (e.g., the time limit identified in the NOTIFY request). In an exemplary embodiment, a hookswitch control of a user interface may interact with SIP Device and a user agent, for example, to detect the offhook condition at the user interface and to notify the server that the original destination has gone offhook. Also, the predetermined time period may be associated with an interval of time (e.g., 10 seconds) or a number of rings, for example. If the original destination does not go offhook and the time limit expires, the forwarded call may not be screened. Further, the original destination may await additional incoming calls in block 608, and when an incoming call occurs, flow chart 600 may proceed to block 602. If the original destination goes offhook before the time limit expires, the original destination may screen the call in block 609.
In block 609, to enable the original destination to join the forwarded call, the user agent of the original destination may transmit an INVITE request to the address of record of the original destination at the server. In an exemplary embodiment, the INVITE request may include a “Join” header that identifies the dialog between the server and the caller and a session description that may specify one-way media such that the original destination only receives audio. The server may then accept the INVITE request from the original destination to create a dialog between the original destination and the server. Also, in an exemplary embodiment, the server may interpret the “Join” header as a request to create a three-way conference including the dialogs between the server and the caller, original destination and forwarded destination.
The server may then create the requested conference. In an exemplary embodiment, to create the conference, the server may construct a conference URI which may server as a unique SIP address for the conference within the server, for example. The server may then send, for example, a “200 OK” response to the original destination. In an exemplary embodiment, the response may include a “Contact” header that may specify the conference URI. Also, the “Contact” header may include an “infocus” parameter to signify that the URI is a conference URI. Once the original destination receives the response, the SIP Device of the original destination may use the URI to establish an audio data connection to the existing audio data being exchanged by the caller and the forwarded destination in order to “screen” or listen to the audio exchange between the caller and the forwarded destination. The original destination may continue to screen the call in block 611 until the call is terminated in block 612, for example.
In the embodiment as described above, where there is a one-way media session, the original destination may be prevented from transmitting audio to either the caller or the forwarded destination. In other words, the one-way media session may prevent the original destination from “speaking” to either party.
In a further exemplary embodiment, the original destination may be able to join the conference and transmit audio to the caller and/or the forwarded destination, for example. In block 610, the original destination may request to converse with the caller and/or the forwarded destination. In an exemplary embodiment, to make the request, the original destination may perform a hookswitch flash, for example, using the hookswitch controls of the user interface. The SIP Device may detect the hookswitch clash and interpret it as a request to converse.
In block 613, to create a two-way media session, the user agent of the original destination may transmit a re-INVITE request to the server in the dialog between the original destination and the server, for example. In the re-INVITE request, the original destination may alter the session description to specify a two-way media session. When the re-INVITE is received by the server, the original device may be able to transmit audio to the caller and/or the forwarded destination. In block 616, the original destination may converse with the caller until the call terminates in block 612.
In a further exemplary embodiment, the original destination may eject the forwarded destination to create a dialog solely between the original destination and the caller. For example, where the forwarded destination is a voice mail system the original destination may want to eject the voice mail system so that the original destination may converse with the caller. In block 614, it may be determined whether the original destination has requested to eject the forwarded destination from the call. In an exemplary embodiment, to eject the forwarded destination, the original destination may perform a hookswitch flash using, for example, the hookswitch controls of a user interface. The SIP Device may interpret the hookswitch flash as a request to eject the forwarded destination from the call session. On detection of a request to eject, in block 615 a user agent of the original destination may transmit a REFER request to the conference URI in the server. The REFER request may specify the address of record of the forwarded destination as the “refer-to” URI, for example. The REFER request may also specify BYE as the method. The server may receive the REFER request and transmit a BYE request to the forwarded destination to terminate the dialog between the server and the forwarded destination and remove the forwarded destination from the call.
In the preceding specification, various preferred embodiments have been described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto, and additional embodiments may be implemented, without departing from the broader scope of the invention as set forth in the claims that follow. The specification and drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
This patent application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/534,230, filed Sep. 22, 2006, entitled “Method and System for Providing Call Screening in a Packet-Switched Network” to David C. Robbins, which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/719,465, filed Sep. 22, 2005. The disclosures of these priority applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3737587 | Romero | Jun 1973 | A |
4154987 | Rosenberg et al. | May 1979 | A |
4528424 | Middleton et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4723271 | Grundtisch | Feb 1988 | A |
4741024 | Del Monte et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4950011 | Borcea et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5165095 | Borcherding | Nov 1992 | A |
5323444 | Ertz et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5471519 | Howe et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5619561 | Reese | Apr 1997 | A |
5815550 | Miller | Sep 1998 | A |
5835570 | Wattenbarger | Nov 1998 | A |
5913166 | Buttitta et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5970134 | Highland et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5999610 | Lin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021176 | McKendry et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026156 | Epler et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031896 | Gardell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6072865 | Haber et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6208726 | Bansal et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219414 | Maciejewski et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6337898 | Gordon | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339639 | Henderson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6404876 | Smith et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6484196 | Maurille | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6510315 | Arnson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6636594 | Oran | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6735295 | Brennan et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741695 | McConnell et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6744877 | Edwards | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754325 | Silver et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6801604 | Maes et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807259 | Patel et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6834048 | Cho et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6856616 | Schuster et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6857072 | Schuster et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870830 | Schuster et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876632 | Takeda | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6879673 | Creamer et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6954521 | Bull et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954524 | Gibson | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6961332 | Li et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6963633 | Diede et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6965614 | Osterhout et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6985961 | Ramsayer et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996605 | Low et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020130 | Krause et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7031700 | Weaver et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039710 | Khartabil | May 2006 | B2 |
7050559 | Silver et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7082193 | Barclay et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085253 | Yang | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7130282 | Black | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7145997 | Poikselka et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7203293 | Bedingfield | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7224792 | Fusco | May 2007 | B2 |
7257837 | Xu et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260201 | Jorasch et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7274662 | Kalmanek et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7283517 | Yan et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290288 | Gregg et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295577 | Moody et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301913 | Corrao et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7406696 | Burger et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7426265 | Chen et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440440 | Abichandani et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7460657 | Baeza | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7489771 | McMurry et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7580497 | Wang et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7593389 | Vance | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599355 | Sunstrum | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7609700 | Ying et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7609706 | Scott et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7630481 | Kafka | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7715413 | Vaziri et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7743141 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7773581 | Punj et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7860089 | Tripathi et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8059805 | Claudatos et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8116302 | Robbins | Feb 2012 | B1 |
20020038388 | Netter | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020114318 | Rines | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020131447 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136359 | Stumer et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136363 | Stumer et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020137495 | Gabrysch | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141548 | Boda | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156900 | Marquette et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030028806 | Govindarajan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043992 | Wengrovitz | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088421 | Maes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030231759 | Bedingfield, Sr. et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040030750 | Moore et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037403 | Koch | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040051900 | Sagiya et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082324 | Ayoub | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040090954 | Zhang et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040148395 | Schulzrinne | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040207724 | Crouch et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040240656 | Poustchi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243680 | Mayer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249951 | Grabelsky et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264406 | Pattenden et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050013421 | Chavez et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050043014 | Hodge | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050069104 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078642 | Mayer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050123104 | Bishop et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129219 | Williamson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147227 | Chervirala et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190721 | Pershan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050193338 | Hawkins et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195802 | Klein et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201530 | Koch et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213716 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215243 | Black et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050226217 | Logemann et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237978 | Segal | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249196 | Ansari et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286466 | Tagg et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060033809 | Farley | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039389 | Burger et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060062210 | Dharanikota | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062251 | Lim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067300 | Poustchi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067504 | Goldman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060140379 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140380 | Croak et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146737 | Ohrstrom Sandgren et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165060 | Dua | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177030 | Rajagopalan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060177044 | O'Neil et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178130 | Makrygiannis | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203986 | Gibson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218283 | Jones et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221176 | Di Pietro et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251229 | Gorti et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285533 | Divine et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286984 | Bonner | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070025270 | Sylvain | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070058613 | Beckemeyer | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083658 | Hanna et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092073 | Olshansky et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070111723 | Ahmed et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070143858 | Hearty | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070280469 | Baker et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080049724 | Tsujino et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080126549 | Khanchandani et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“AINGR: Switching Systems, GR-1298-CORE” Telcordia Technologies, Telcordia Technologies Generic Requirements, GR-1298-CORE, Issue 6, 1226 pages. Nov. 2000. |
“Cisco CallManager Features and Services Guide, Release 4.1(3)—Multilevel Precedence and Preemption,” Cisco Systems, Inc., http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products—administration—guide, Accessed Oct. 24, 2007, pp. 3-5, Copyright 2005. |
“IP Office, Do Not Disturb,” Carroll Communications, Inc., www.carrollcommunications.com/ipoffice/5donotdisturb.html, Retrieved from the internet on Nov. 6, 2007, 1 page. |
“LSSGR Guide, (A Module of LSSGR, FR-64)” Telcordia Technologies, Telcordia Technologies Special Report (3065) Issue 7, Aug. 2003, 114 pages. |
“Newton's Telecom Dictionary 22nd Edition,” San Francisco, USA, Feb. 2006, p. 829. |
“SPCS Capabilities and Features, A Module of LSSGR, FR-64,” Telcordia Technologies, Telcordia Technologies Special Report (SR-504), Issue 1, Mar. 1996, 212 pages. |
Handley, et al., “SDP: Session Description Protocol, RFC 2327,” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, Apr. 1998, 43 pages. |
Harrington, et al., “RFC 3411—An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks,” The Internet Society, Dec. 2002, pp. 1-65. |
Jennings, et al., “Private Extensions to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for Asserted Identity within Trusted Networks, RFC 3325,” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, Nov. 2002, pp. 1-18. |
Johnston, et al., “Session Initiation Protocol Call Control, Conferencing for User Agents, draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-04,” The Internet Society, Jul. 18, 2004, pp. 1-39. |
Lingle, et al., “Management Information Base for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), draft-ietf-sip-mib-08,” Cisco Systems, Inc., The Internet Society, Jul. 16, 2004, 102 pages. |
Mahy, et al., “A Call Control and Multi-party usage framework for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), draft-ietf-sipping-cc-framework-03,” The Internet Society, Oct. 27, 2003, pp. 1-43. |
Mahy, et al., “The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) ‘Join’ Header, draft-ietf-sip-join-03.txt.,” The Internet Society, Feb. 16, 2004, pp. 1-20. |
Mahy, “RFC 3842—A Message Summary and Message Waiting Indication Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” Cisco Systems, Inc., The Internet Society, Aug. 2004, pp. 1-19. |
Mahy, et al., “RFC 3891—The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) ‘Replaces’ Header,” The Internet Society, Sep. 2004, pp. 1-16. |
Mahy et al, “RFC 3911—The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) ‘Join’ Header,” The Internet Society, Oct. 2004, pp. 1-17. |
Mahy, et al., “The Session Inititation Protocol (SIP) ‘Replaces’ Header,” draft-ietf-sip-replaces-05.txt., The Internet Society, Feb. 16, 2004, pp. 1-19. |
Petrie, “A Framework for Session Initiation Protocol User Agent Profile Delivery,” The Internet Society, draft-ietf-sipping-config-framework-04 Pingtel Corp., The Internet Society, Jul. 19, 2004, 34 pages. |
Rosenberg, et al., “A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for Conference State, draft-ietf-sipping-conference-package-04,” The Internet Society, May 21, 2004, 29 pages. |
Rosenberg, et al., “An INVITE Inititiated Dialog Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-04, The Internet Society, Feb. 13, 2004, pp. 1-35. |
Rosenberg, et al. “RFC 3261, SIP: Session Initiation Protocol,” The Internet Society, Jun. 2002, 252 pages. |
Rosenberg, et al., “RFC 3262—Reliability of Provisional Responses in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” The Internet Society, Jun. 2002, pp. 1-14. |
Rosenberg, et al., “RFC 3840—Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP),” The Internet Society, Aug. 2004, pp. 1-35. |
Rosenberg, “The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) UPDATE Method, RFC 3311,” Dynamisoft Inc., Network Working Group, The Internet Society, Sep. 2002, pp. 1-13. |
Schulzrinne, et al., “Emergency Services URI for the Session Initiation Protocol, draft-ietf-sipping-sos-00,” Columbia University, The Internet Society, Feb. 8, 2004, pp. 1-17. |
Schulzrinne, et al., “RFC 1889—RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications,” The Internet Society, Jan. 1996, pp. 1-75. |
Schulzrinne, et al., “RFC 2833—RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones and Telephony Signals,” Columbia University, The Internet Society, May 2000, 30 pages. |
Sparks, “RFC 3515—The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Refer Method,” The Internet Society, Apr. 2003, pp. 1-23. |
Sparks, et al., “Session Initiation Protocol Call Control—Transfer, draft-ietf-sipping-cc-transfer-02,” The Internet Society, Feb. 15, 2004, pp. 1-37. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110158132 A1 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60719465 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11534230 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 13039877 | US |