Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) is a call control signaling protocol for Internet Protocol (IP) networks. SIP is designed to be device-agnostic—that is, it is intended to provide a highly flexible call signaling capability that is not tailored to the capabilities of any particular device. Analog telephone signaling, on the other hand, is device-specific and highly constrained because of the historical legacy of the services delivered to the device. As a result, many call features available in traditional analog telephone devices are not easily integrated in a SIP-based network.
In order to facilitate a fuller understanding of the exemplary embodiments of the present inventions, reference is now made to the appended drawings. These drawings should not be construed as limiting, but are intended to be exemplary only.
A system and process of an exemplary embodiment of the present invention provides call waiting features over a SIP based network to a device such as an analog based device. An embodiment of the present invention may support a call waiting “deluxe” service which allows a called party to respond to an incoming call request by providing one or more user actions. User actions by way of non-limiting example may include answering a call request, forwarding a call request, transferring a call request to an announcement server, dropping a call request, putting a call request on hold, transferring a call request to a voice mail server, putting a call request in conference with an existing call and/or other user actions.
SIP Device 110 may represent a device that manages User Interface 114. User Interface 114 may include a traditional telephone and other data communication device using voiceband or other signaling, including but not limited to data modems, facsimile devices, teletype (TTY) equipment, etc. SIP Device 110 may contain SIP User Agent 112. SIP User Agent 112 may be integrated with SIP Device 110 or remote from SIP Device 110. SIP User Agent 112 may perform interworking between SIP signaling and user interface actions. For example, SIP User Agent 112 may manage an exchange of media (e.g., audio, etc.) between User Interface 114 and a Real Time Protocol (RTP) media stream of a media session set up by the SIP signaling. SIP Device 110 may originate calls to and receive calls from other users. SIP Device 110 may communicate through IP Network 120 to SIP Server 122.
SIP Server 122 may represent a SIP proxy or application server that acts on behalf of SIP Device 110. For example, SIP Server 122 may manage a SIP Address of Record (AOR) on behalf of SIP Device 110. SIP Device 110 may register with SIP Server 122 and send SIP signaling through SIP Server 122 to other SIP elements, such as SIP Element 130 and SIP Element 132. For example, a call to the SIP AOR may be delivered to SIP Server 122, which in turn delivers the call to SIP Device 110. SIP Server 122 may perform some service on behalf of SIP Device 110, or may simply forward SIP messages to and from SIP Device 110. SIP Device 110 communicates through IP Network 124 to SIP Element 130 and/or SIP Element 132.
SIP Element 130 and SIP Element 132 may represent users with which the user of SIP Device 110 communicates. A SIP element may be a SIP Device, SIP Server, and/or other SIP enabled device. In addition, a SIP element may also represent a PSTN device that may be reached by a gateway that, directly or indirectly, acts as a SIP User Agent.
As shown in
A user connected to SIP Element 132 may call the first user by sending a SIP INVITE request to SIP Server 122. SIP Server 122 may send the INVITE request to SIP Device 110. According to one embodiment, Dialog 128 may be established. SIP Device 110 may indicate to the user at User Interface 114 that it has received an INVITE request. The user at User Interface 114 may perform an action to answer the INVITE request. This action may place existing Dialog 126 on hold and activate Dialog 128, enabling the user to send a dual tone multi frequency (DTMF) signal to SIP Server 122 on Dialog 128. By way of non-limiting example, the user action may be a “hookswitch flash.” SIP Server 122 may wait to receive a user response to the SIP INVITE request. For example, SIP Server 122 may set a timer which may execute a specified default action upon expiration. A user response may be a DTMF signal which may correspond to a user selection. By way of non-limiting example, a user response transmitted by SIP Device 110 may include a DTMF signal corresponding to a user response of “answer” or other action. As a result, SIP Server 122 may allow User Interface 114 to answer a call request from SIP Element 132 when currently engaged in an active call with SIP Element 130. SIP Server 122 may then interconnect the media streams of Dialog 128 and Dialog 134 permitting the exchange of audio or other data between the first user and the third user.
In other examples, SIP Server 122 may manage the dialogs between a first user and one or more other users in response to an expiration of a timer set by SIP Server 122 or other element. For example, the timer may be set after sending a call request to a first user. For example, the timer may be set after SIP Server 122 detects that Dialog 126 or Dialog 128 has been activated (taken “off hold”) by SIP Device 110. In some examples, the timer may be a predetermined response time or may be based on a condition. According to an embodiment of the present invention, a server may manage dialogs between a first user and one or more other users upon expiration of a timer by executing a default action. By way of non-limiting example, actions available to a user for the management of call dialogs may include one or more of the following: answer, forward, announcement, drop, hold, conference and/or other action. For example, one or more user responses may be available to a first user when the first user is engaged in an active call and a second call request is received by the first user. By way of non-limiting example, additional actions available to a user for the management of call dialogs may also include return, drop, conference and/or other action.
These user responses may be available to a first user when a user is engaged in one active call and has a second answered call on hold. By way of non-limiting example, further actions available to a user for the management of call dialogs may include “drop first choice,” “drop last choice,” etc. These choices may be available, for example, when a first user is engaged in a conference call with two or more additional users.
In some exemplary embodiments of the present invention, User Interface 114 may be an Analog Display Services Interface (ADSI) compatible telephone, which may provide a display and may provide additional function buttons. The additional function buttons may be mapped to correspond to user actions which may send hookswitch flashes, a DTMF signal and/or other action. In some embodiments, a user action may be indicated by a hookswitch flash alone. In other examples, the embodiment of the present invention may be combined with other functionality such as caller identification and/or talking call waiting which may provide an indication of the identity of a caller. In such examples, a user may use the calling party's identity to determine the disposition of an incoming call request.
Announcement Server 138 may allow calls to be directed to announcements. For example, an announcement server may provide recorded announcements. In addition, Announcement Server 138 may be connected to SIP Server 122 over an IP network. Announcement Server 138 may play a specified announcement to a call directed to the announcement server. In an exemplary embodiment of the present invention, Announcement Server may provide a customized announcement based on the identity of the intended call recipient or other attribute. For example, an announcement may be customized to contain an intended call recipient's name. In other embodiments, an announcement may be synthesized based on a call information such as the identification or geographic origin of the call.
Voice Mail Server 140 may allow calls to be directed to voice mail. Voice Mail Server 140 may be accessible to SIP Server 122 over an IP network. For example, a call request may be redirected from SIP Device 110 to Voice Mail Server 140 by SIP Server 122. SIP Server 122 may redirect the call request in response to a user specified action, in response to the expiration of a timer or other response. Voice Mail Server 140 may provide voice mail functionality to one or more users.
According to some embodiments of the present invention, various combinations of a SIP server, an announcement server and a voice mail server may be implemented.
As shown in
The various components of systems 200 and 300 as shown in
At step 420, a first call request for a first user may be received from a second user. According to some examples, a call request may be received at a network element. In one or more embodiments, a call request may be received at SIP Server 122 associated with the first user, and may be in the form of a SIP INVITE message from SIP Element 130 associated with the second user.
At step 430, a dialog may be established between a second user and a network element. By way of non-limiting example, Dialog 134 may be established between SIP Element 130 and SIP Server 122.
At step 440, a dialog may be established between the first user and a network element. By way of non-limiting example, Dialog 126 may be established between SIP Device 110 associated with the first user and SIP Server 122. According to an embodiment of the present invention, dialogs may be interconnected permitting the transmission of audio signals. In one or more embodiments, a SIP server may permit conversation, the transmission of audio signals and/or other data between a caller and a call recipient by interconnecting the dialog of a call recipient and a SIP server with the dialog of a caller and a SIP server. In such embodiments a SIP server may act as a back to back user agent (B2BUA).
At step 450, a second call request to the first user may be received from a third user. According to some examples, a network element may receive a second call request. In one or more embodiments, a call request may be a SIP INVITE from SIP Element 132 associated with the third user which may be received at SIP Server 122.
At step 460, a dialog may be established between a network element and the third user. By way of non-limiting example, Dialog 136 may be established between SIP Server 122 and SIP Element 132.
At step 465, a second dialog may be established between the first user and a network element. By way of non-limited example, Dialog 128 may be established between SIP Device 110 and SIP Server 122. The first user may be alerted to the establishment of the second dialog, for example, by SIP Device 110 providing a device-compatible alert signal to User Interface 114. For example, SIP Device 110 may provide an alert tone or other alert message to User Interface 114.
At step 467, the first user may take an action in response to the second dialog. For example, the first user may take an action that causes the first dialog between the first user and a network element to be placed on hold and the second dialog between the first user and a network element to become active. For example, the user at SIP Device 110 may place the existing Dialog 126 on hold and activate the new Dialog 128. Alternatively, the first user may take no action in response to the second dialog. A network element may wait to receive a user action on the second dialog, for example, by establishing a timer, and may interpret a timeout with no indication of user action being received as a default user action. In the described embodiment, SIP Server 122 may establish a timer for a response from SIP Device 110, and interpret a failure to receive an action indication as a selection of the default action by the first user.
In embodiments where an analog user interface (e.g., analog telephone) is being used in conjunction with SIP Device 110, user action may take a form consistent with the capabilities of such user interfaces. For example, the user may perform a “hookswitch flash” to signal a hold of the active call and a switch to the new call. Likewise, the user may depress keypad keys of User Interface 114 to generate DTMF tones indicating selection of actions. Such actions may be interpreted by SIP Device 110 and SIP User Agent 112 as selection of a call waiting deluxe call disposition option. SIP User Agent 112 may then formulate a SIP message that includes an indication of the action selection by the first user. For example, SIP User Agent 112 may generate a message that includes indications of the DTMF tones generated by User Interface 114 immediately after receiving the hookswitch flash, and send such message to SIP Server 112 as part of Dialog 128.
At step 470, an indication of a user action may be received. For example, an indication of a user action may be received at a network element in response to the second call request. According to an embodiment of the present invention, the indication of a user action may indicate a disposition option of the second call request, according to the disposition options that may be available as part of the call waiting deluxe service. In some embodiments, the indication of the user action may include indications of one or more DTMF tones generated by the user interface while the second dialog is active.
At step 480, the process may continue at step 510 of
In some embodiments a response from the first user may be received at a network element. For example, a SIP server may receive a user response of an indication of a DTMF signal from a SIP device, which the network element may map to certain available options for call disposition. At decision box 510, if a user response signifying “Answer” is received, the flow may proceed to step 514. If a user response signifying “Answer” is not received, the flow may proceed to step 520. At step 514, a network element may place the original dialog with the second user on hold. At step 516, a network element may affirmatively answer the second call request. At step 518, a network element may interconnect the dialogs of a call recipient and a third party permitting the transmission of audio signals between the two parties. By way of non-limiting example of the illustrated embodiment, SIP Server 122 may place Dialog 134 on hold and may interconnect Dialogs 136 and 128, thus allowing for communication between the first user and third user to occur.
At decision box 520, if a user response signifying “Forward” is received, the flow may proceed to step 524. At step 524, a network element may forward the second call request. For example, a network element may forward the second call request to a voice mail server. In other embodiments, a network element may forward a second call request to a specified destination (possibly preset by the first user). At step 528, if the network element previously disconnected the dialogs of the first user and second user pending disposition of the second call request, the network element may interconnect the dialogs of the first user and the network element and the second user and the network element which may resume their communications. At step 530, the network element may terminate the dialog between the first user and the network element established as part of the second call request. In the illustrated embodiment, a receipt of an indication from SIP Device 110 that maps to the “Forward” action may cause SIP Server 122 to forward the call from the third user to Voice Mail Server 140, and terminate the Dialog 136.
If a user response signifying “Forward” is not received, the flow may proceed to decision box 534. At decision box 534, if a user response signifying “Announcement” is received, the flow may proceed to step 538. At step 538, a network element may forward the second call to an announcement server. According to some examples, a caller forwarded to an announcement server may hear a recorded announcement. According to other examples, a caller forwarded to an announcement server may hear a personalized announcement. At step 540, if the network element previously disconnected the dialogs of the first user and second user pending disposition of the second call request, the network element may interconnect the dialogs of the first user and the network element and the second user and the network element, which may resume their communications. At step 560, the network element may terminate the dialog between the first user and the network element established as part of the second call request. In the illustrated embodiment, a receipt of an indication from SIP Device 110 that maps to the “Announcement” action may cause SIP Server 122 to forward the call from the third user to Announcement Server 138, and terminate the Dialog 128.
If a user response signifying “Announcement” is not received, the flow may proceed to decision box 564. At decision box 564, if a user response signifying “Drop” is received, the flow may proceed to step 568. At step 568, a network element may terminate the dialog between the first user and the network element established as part of the second call request, and terminate the dialog between the third user and the network element also established as part of the second call request. According to some examples, at step 570 the network element may maintain (or reconnect, if they were disconnected) the dialogs permitting communication between the first user and the second user. In the illustrated embodiment, a receipt of an indication from SIP Device 110 that maps to the “Drop” action may cause SIP Server 122 to terminate Dialog 136 and Dialog 128.
If a user response signifying “Drop” is not received, the flow may proceed to decision box 574. At decision box 574, if a user response signifying “Conference” is received, the flow may proceed to step 578. At step 578, a network element may affirmatively answer the second call request. At step 580, a network element may interconnect the dialogs of the original communications between the first user and second user with the dialog established with the third user as part of the second call request, thus permitting the transmission of communications between the first user and the second and third users. In the illustrated embodiment, a receipt of an indication from SIP Device 110 that maps to the “Conference” action may cause SIP Server 122 to interconnect Dialog 136 with Dialog 126 and Dialog 134.
If a user response signifying “Conference” is not received, the flow may proceed to decision box 590. At decision box 590, if a user response signifying “Hold” is received, the flow may proceed to step 591. At step 591, a network element may affirmatively answer the second call request. At step 592, a network element may place the dialog between a third user and a network element established as part of the second call request on hold. At step 593, if the network element previously disconnected the dialogs of the first user and second user pending disposition of the second call request, the network element may interconnect the dialogs of the first user and the network element and the second user and the network element, which may resume their communication.
If a user response signifying “Hold” is not received, the flow may proceed to decision box 594. At decision box 594, if a user response signifying another action is received, the flow may proceed to step 596. At step 596, a network element may perform an action corresponding to the signal specified by a user response (or if no further actions are supported, may indicate an error condition).
If a user response signifying another action is not received, the flow may proceed to step 598. At step 598, if no user response is received, a timer set by a network element may expire and the network element may execute a default action. For example, the default action may be preset to forward the incoming call to a voice mail server.
At step 599, the process may end.
At decision box 610, if a user response signifying “Return” is received, the flow may proceed to step 614. If a user response signifying “Return” is not received, the flow may proceed to decision box 620.
At step 614, a network element may place a current call on hold. At step 618, a network element may interconnect dialogs of a first user and the network element and a second user and the network element which may resume a conversation.
At decision box 620, if a user response signifying “Drop” is received, the flow may proceed to step 624. At step 624, a network element may disconnect a dialog of a second request. At step 628, a network element may interconnect dialogs of a first user and the network element and a second user and the network element which may resume a conversation.
If a user response signifying “Drop” is not received, the flow may proceed to decision box 630. At decision box 630, if a user response signifying “Conference” is received, the flow may proceed to step 634. At step 638, a network element may interconnect the dialogs of the original conversation and a second call request permitting the transmission of audio between a first user and two or more other users.
If a user response signifying “Conference” is not received, the flow may proceed to decision box 640. At decision box 640, if a user response signifying another action is received, the flow may proceed to step 644. If a user response signifying another action is not received, the flow may proceed to step 648. At step 644, a network element may perform an action corresponding to a signal specified by a user response.
At step 648, the process may end.
At decision box 710, if a user response signifying “Drop First Choice” is received, the flow may proceed to step 714. At step 714, a network element may remove a dialog between a second user and a network element from a conference and may terminate that dialog. At step 718, a network element may interconnect dialogs of a first user and the network element and a third user and the network element which may resume a conversation.
If a user response signifying “Drop First Choice” is not received, the flow may proceed to decision box 720.
At decision box 720, if a user response signifying “Drop Last Choice” is received, the flow may proceed to step 724. At step 724, a network element may remove a dialog between a third user and a network element from a conference and may terminate that dialog. At step 728, a network element may interconnect dialogs of a first user and the network element and a second user and the network element which may resume a conversation. If a user response signifying “Drop Last Choice” is not received, the flow may proceed to decision box 740. At decision box 740, if a user response signifying another action is received, the flow may proceed to step 744. At step 744, a network element may perform an action corresponding to a signal specified by a user response.
If a user response signifying another action is not received, the flow may proceed to step 748.
At step 748, the process may end.
At step 820, a call request may be received. According to some examples, a call request may be a SIP INVITE received by a SIP device. According to some embodiments, this may establish a dialog between a network element and a SIP Device. At step 830, a second call request may be received. At step 840, a user action may be performed that places the dialog established by the first call request on hold and answers the second call request, establishing a second dialog between a device and a network element. In some embodiments, the user action may be a hookswitch flash.
At step 850, the user may use the user interface to generate a signal corresponding to a disposition option for the call request, and the SIP device may send a message including an indication of the selection action to a network element indicating the disposition of a call request. In one or more examples, the signal generated by the user interface may be a DTMF signal corresponding to a user selection. Other user signals may be recognized. In some examples, the SIP device receiving such signals may interpret such signals and generate appropriate SIP messaging corresponding to such signals, thus enabling traditional analog devices connected to the SIP device to provide a user with one or more functions to handle incoming call requests. In some embodiments, steps 840 and 850 may be performed multiple times during the existence of the first and second dialogs. For example, upon receipt of the hookswitch flash, the SIP device may put the currently active dialog on hold, and activate the currently held dialog. The SIP device may then send any action selection indications received from the user interface to the network element as part of the newly activated dialog to effect the selected call disposition.
In the preceding specification, various preferred embodiments have been described with reference to the accompanying drawings. It will, however, be evident that various modifications and changes may be made thereto, and additional embodiments may be implemented, without departing from the broader scope of the invention as set forth in the claims that follow. The specification and drawings are accordingly to be regarded in an illustrative rather than restrictive sense.
This patent application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/534,426, filed Sep. 22, 2006 which claims priority to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 60/719,465, filed Sep. 22, 2005. The contents of these priority applications are hereby incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3737587 | Romero | Jun 1973 | A |
4154987 | Rosenberg et al. | May 1979 | A |
4528424 | Middleton et al. | Jul 1985 | A |
4723271 | Grundtisch | Feb 1988 | A |
4741024 | Del Monte et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4950011 | Borcea et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
5165095 | Borcherding | Nov 1992 | A |
5255314 | Applegate et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5323444 | Ertz et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
5471519 | Howe et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
5475745 | Boyle | Dec 1995 | A |
5619561 | Reese | Apr 1997 | A |
5758284 | Chavez, Jr. et al. | May 1998 | A |
5815550 | Miller | Sep 1998 | A |
5835570 | Wattenbarger | Nov 1998 | A |
5913166 | Buttitta et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5970134 | Highland et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5999610 | Lin et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6021176 | McKendry et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6026156 | Epler et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6031896 | Gardell et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6072865 | Haber et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6208726 | Bansal et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6219414 | Maciejewski et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6308726 | Sato et al. | Oct 2001 | B2 |
6337898 | Gordon | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6339639 | Henderson | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6404876 | Smith et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6453040 | Burke et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6484196 | Maurille | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6510315 | Arnson | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6636594 | Oran | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6735295 | Brennan et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6741695 | McConnell et al. | May 2004 | B1 |
6744877 | Edwards | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6754325 | Silver et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6801604 | Maes et al. | Oct 2004 | B2 |
6807259 | Patel et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
6826174 | Erekson et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6834048 | Cho et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6856616 | Schuster et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6857072 | Schuster et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6870830 | Schuster et al. | Mar 2005 | B1 |
6876632 | Takeda | Apr 2005 | B1 |
6879673 | Creamer et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6954521 | Bull et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6954524 | Gibson | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6961332 | Li et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6963633 | Diede et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6965614 | Osterhout et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6985961 | Ramsayer et al. | Jan 2006 | B1 |
6996605 | Low et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7020130 | Krause et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7031700 | Weaver et al. | Apr 2006 | B1 |
7039710 | Khartabil | May 2006 | B2 |
7050559 | Silver et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7082193 | Barclay et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7085253 | Yang | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7123707 | Hiri et al. | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7130282 | Black | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7145997 | Poikselka et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7203293 | Bedingfield | Apr 2007 | B1 |
7224792 | Fusco | May 2007 | B2 |
7257837 | Xu et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7260201 | Jorasch et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7274662 | Kalmanek et al. | Sep 2007 | B1 |
7283517 | Yan et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7290288 | Gregg et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7295577 | Moody et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7301913 | Corrao et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7406696 | Burger et al. | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7426265 | Chen et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7440440 | Abichandani et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7460657 | Baeza | Dec 2008 | B1 |
7489771 | McMurry et al. | Feb 2009 | B2 |
7564846 | Dezonno et al. | Jul 2009 | B2 |
7580497 | Wang et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7587031 | Ress et al. | Sep 2009 | B1 |
7593389 | Vance | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7599355 | Sunstrum | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7602901 | Kates et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7609700 | Ying et al. | Oct 2009 | B1 |
7609706 | Scott et al. | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7630481 | Kafka | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7711810 | McKinnon et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7715413 | Vaziri et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7743141 | Wang et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7751536 | Abramson et al. | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7773581 | Punj et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7813490 | DeMent et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7849205 | Pounds et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7860089 | Tripathi et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
8036360 | Gogineni et al. | Oct 2011 | B1 |
8059805 | Claudatos et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8116302 | Robbins | Feb 2012 | B1 |
8379824 | Jackson et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
20020038388 | Netter | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020075305 | Beaton et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020114318 | Rines | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020131447 | Krishnamurthy et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136359 | Stumer et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020136363 | Stumer et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020137495 | Gabrysch | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141548 | Boda | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020156900 | Marquette et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030007483 | Um | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030028806 | Govindarajan et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030043992 | Wengrovitz | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030088421 | Maes et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030231759 | Bedingfield, Sr. et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040004942 | Nebiker et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040030750 | Moore et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040037403 | Koch | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040051900 | Sagiya et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040082324 | Ayoub | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040090954 | Zhang et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040148395 | Schulzrinne | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040174983 | Olschwang et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040207724 | Crouch et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20040240650 | Bear et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040240656 | Poustchi | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040243680 | Mayer | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040249951 | Grabelsky et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040264406 | Pattenden et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050013421 | Chavez et al. | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050043014 | Hodge | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050069104 | Hanson et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050078642 | Mayer et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050123104 | Bishop et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050129219 | Williamson | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050147227 | Chervirala et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050190721 | Pershan | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050193338 | Hawkins et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050195802 | Klein et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050201530 | Koch et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050213716 | Zhu et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050215243 | Black et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050226217 | Logemann et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050237978 | Segal | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050249196 | Ansari et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050286466 | Tagg et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060023658 | Phillips et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060033809 | Farley | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060039389 | Burger et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060050648 | Eydelman | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060050682 | Vance | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062210 | Dharanikota | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060062251 | Lim et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067300 | Poustchi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060067504 | Goldman et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060140379 | Yamamoto et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060140380 | Croak et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060146737 | Ohrstrom Sandgren et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060153342 | Sasaki | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060165060 | Dua | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060177030 | Rajagopalan et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060177044 | O'Neil et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060178130 | Makrygiannis | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060203986 | Gibson | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218283 | Jones et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060221176 | Di Pietro et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251229 | Gorti et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285533 | Divine et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20060286984 | Bonner | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070025270 | Sylvain | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070058613 | Beckemeyer | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070058637 | Lo | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070083658 | Hanna et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070092073 | Olshansky et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070111723 | Ahmed et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070127660 | Roberts et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070143858 | Hearty | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070147601 | Tischer et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070280469 | Baker et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080049724 | Tsujino et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080126549 | Khanchandani et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
“AINGR: Switching Systems, (a module of AINGR, FR-15),” Telcordia Technologies Generic Requirements, GR-1298-CORE, Issue 6, 1226 pages, Nov. 2000. |
“Cisco CallManager Features and Services Guide, Release 4.1(3)—Multilevel Precedence and Preemption,” Cisco Systems, Inc., http://www.cisco.com/en/US/products/sw/voicesw/ps556/products—administration—guide . . . , three pages, Copyright 2005. |
“IP Office, Do Not Disturb,” Carroll Communications, Inc., www.carrollcommunications.com/ipoffice/5donotdisturb.html, one page, Copyright 2008. |
“LSSGR Guide, (A Module of LSSGR, FR-64),” Telcordia Technologies Special Report, SR-3065, Issue 7, 114 pages, Aug. 2003. |
“Newton's Telecom Dictionary, 22nd Edition,” CMP Books, three pages, Feb. 2006. |
“SPCS Capabilities and Features, A Module of LSSGR, FR-64,” Telcordia Technologies Special Report, SR-504, Issue 1, 212 pages, Mar. 1996. |
Handley, et al., “SDP: Session Description Protocol, RFC 2327,” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, 43 pages, Apr. 1998. |
Harrington, et al., “An Architecture for Describing Simple Network Management Protocol (SNMP) Management Frameworks, RFC 3411,” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-64, Dec. 2002. |
Jennings, et al., “Private Extensions to the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) for Asserted Identity within Trusted Networks, RFC 3325,” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-18, Nov. 2002. |
Johnston, et al., “Session Initiation Protocol Call Control, Conferencing for User Agents, draft-ietf-sipping-cc-conferencing-04,” SIPPING Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-39, Jul. 18, 2004. |
Lingle, et al., “Management Information Base for Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), draft-ietf-sip-mib-08.txt,” SIPPING Working Group, The Internet Society, 102 pages, Jul. 16, 2004. |
Mahy, et al., “A Call Control and Multi-Party Usage Framework for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), draft-ietf-sipping-cc-framework-03.txt.” SIPPING Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-43. Oct. 27, 2003. |
Mahy, “A Message Summary and Message Waiting Indication Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), RFC 3842,” Cisco Systems, Inc., Network Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-19, Aug. 2004. |
Mahy, et al., “The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) ‘Join’ Header, draft-ietf-sip-join-03.txt.,” SIPPING Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-20, Feb. 2004. |
Mahy et al, “The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) ‘Join’ Header, RFC 3911,” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-17, Oct. 2004. |
Many, et al., “The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) ‘Replaces’ Header, draft-ietf-sip-replaces-05.txt.,” SIPPING Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-19, Feb. 16, 2004. |
Mahy, et al., “The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) ‘Replaces’ Header, RFC 3891,” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-16, Sep. 2004. |
Petrie, “A Framework for Session Initiation Protocol User Agent Profile Delivery, draft-letf-sipping-config-framework-04.txt,” Pingtei Corp., SIPPING Working Group, The Internet Society, 34 pages, Jul. 19, 2004. |
Rosenberg, et al., “A Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Event Package for Conference State, draft-ietf-sipping-conference-package-04,” SIPPING Working Group, The Internet Society, 29 pages, May 21, 2004. |
Rosenberg, et al., “An INVITE Initiated Dialog Event Package for the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), draft-ietf-sipping-dialog-package-04.txt,” SIPPING Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-35, Feb. 13, 2004. |
Rosenberg, et al., “Indicating User Agent Capabilities in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), RFC 3840,” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-35, Aug. 2004. |
Rosenberg, et al., “Reliability of Provisional Responses in the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP), RFC 3262,” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-14, Jun. 2002. |
Rosenberg, et al., “SIP: Session initiation Protocol—RFC 3261,” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, 269 pages, Jun. 2002. |
Rosenberg, “The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Update Method, RFC 3311,” Dynamicsoft Inc., Network Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-13, Sep. 2002. |
Schulzrinne, “Emergency Services URI for the Session Initiation Protocol, draft-ietf-sipping-sos-00,” Columbia University, Network Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-17, Feb. 8, 2004. |
Schulzrinne, et al., “RTP Payload for DTMF Digits, Telephony Tones and Telephony Signals, RFC 2833,” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, 31 page, May 2000. |
Schulzrinne, et al., “RTP: A Transport Protocol for Real-Time Applications, RFC 1889,” Network Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-75, Jan. 1996. |
Sparks, et al., “Session Initiation Protocol Call Control—Transfer, draft-ietf-sipping-cc-transfer-02,” SIPPING Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-37, Feb. 15, 2004. |
Sparks, “The Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Refer Method, RFC 3515,” Dynamicsoft, Inc., Network Working Group, The Internet Society, pp. 1-23, Apr. 2003. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130138821 A1 | May 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60719465 | Sep 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11534426 | Sep 2006 | US |
Child | 13751398 | US |