This invention relates generally to the combustion of solid fuels and, more particularly, to the generation and storage of sorbent used to capture mercury (Hg) in flue gas generated during coal combustion.
Volatile metals such as mercury are among the air pollutants produced by coal combustion processes. As mercury volatizes during coal combustion, it enters the flue gas generated by the combustion. If not captured, the mercury may pass into the atmosphere with the stack gases from the combustor. At least some known methods of reducing mercury emissions include the injection of an activated carbon as a sorbent that captures mercury in the flue gas. The mercury can then be removed from the flue gas and sequestered in an environmentally acceptable manner. The efficiency of mercury removal by activated carbon injection depends on coal type and the specific configuration of the emission control system, such as injection of the sorbent upstream of a particulate collector or a compact baghouse added downstream an existing electrostatic particulate control device. However, material costs of activated carbon in some cases limit the usefulness of activated carbon mercury removal systems.
In one embodiment, a method for capturing mercury in a flue gas includes partially oxidizing a carbonaceous solid fuel in a gasifier such that a thermally activated carbon-containing solid sorbent and gaseous gasification products are generated wherein the gasifier is proximate to a combustion system for combusting a mercury containing fuel. The method further includes storing the generated thermally activated carbon-containing solid sorbent proximate to the combustion system and combusting a mercury containing fuel in a combustion zone of the combustion system wherein mercury released during combustion is entrained in flue gas generated by the combustion. The method also includes injecting the thermally activated solid sorbent in the flue gas downstream of the combustion zone and absorbing at least a portion of the entrained mercury on the thermally activated solid sorbent.
In another embodiment, a system for capturing mercury from a stream of flue gas includes a waste treatment system coupled in flow communication with a source of flue gas that includes mercury wherein the waste treatment system is configured to receive the stream of flue gas from the source of flue gas and wherein the waste treatment system includes a solid sorbent injector and a solid sorbent collection device. The system also includes a solid sorbent generator coupled in flow communication with said waste treatment system, and a solid sorbent storage vessel configured to receive a flow of solid sorbent from said solid sorbent generator and configured to supply a flow of stored sorbent material to said waste treatment system.
In yet another embodiment, a method for capturing mercury in a flue gas formed by solid fuel combustion includes combusting a solid coal fuel in a combustion zone such that mercury released from the fuel during combustion is entrained in a flow of flue gas generated by the combustion. The method also includes generating a thermally activated carbon-containing solid sorbent and gaseous gasification products by partially gasifying a carbon solid fuel in a gasifier proximate the combustion zone and storing the solid sorbent generated in the gasifier in a sorbent storage vessel proximate the flow of flue gas. The method further includes injecting the thermally activated solid sorbent from the storage vessel into the flue gas downstream of the combustion zone and capturing at least some of the entrained mercury with the injected solid sorbent. Optionally, the thermally activated solid sorbent can be further activated by adding halogens, for example, but not limited to bromine prior to the storage in the storage vessel.
The following detailed description illustrates embodiments of the invention by way of example and not by way of limitation. It is contemplated that the invention has general application to reducing emissions from combustion systems such as boilers, furnaces, and kilns.
As used herein, an element or step recited in the singular and proceeded with the word “a” or “an” should be understood as not excluding plural elements or steps, unless such exclusion is explicitly recited. Furthermore, references to “one embodiment” of the present invention are not intended to be interpreted as excluding the existence of additional embodiments that also incorporate the recited features.
Flue gas 114 flows through boiler 104 and into an exhaust duct 115 releasing its heat to a plurality of heat exchange tubes and platens (not shown) suspended in duct 115. Duct 115 channels flue gas 114 to waste treatment system 106. In the exemplary embodiment, waste treatment system 106 includes a sorbent injection system 116, a particulate control device (PCD) 118, such as an electrostatic precipitator (ESP) including a plurality of ash discharge hoppers 120 for the removal of collected ash for further processing, and a stack 122 for flue gas discharge. Sorbent injection system 116 may inject sorbent into duct 115 upstream 122 of PCD 118. In addition (or alternatively) the sorbent may be injected downstream 124 of PCD 118 if a dedicated sorbent particulate collection device 126 is included in waste treatment system 106.
A sorbent discharge chute 128 is configured to convey the sorbent from a sorbent storage vessel 130 to sorbent injection system 116. Sorbent exiting sorbent storage vessel 130 may be assisted using for example, a live wall hopper 132. Sorbent storage vessel 130 is configured to receive thermally activated carbon-containing sorbent generated by partially gasifying a fuel in a gasifier located proximate sorbent storage vessel 130. In the exemplary embodiment, a gasifier 134 is configured to partially gasify a fuel 136. A sorbent extractor 138 for example, but not limited to a lance is configured to extract the thermally activated sorbent, which is a semi-combusted coal or other carbon containing solid fuel from a combustion zone 140 of gasifier 134. Storing the sorbent material facilitates an ability to provide close control over sorbent feed rate based on stack emissions. Additionally, storing the sorbent material permits operating power plant 100 at times when gasifier 134 is not in service and also permits operating gasifier 134 to generate sorbent material when power plant 100 is not in service. Such flexibility in the dispatch of interrelated process plants facilitates increasing the availability and/or capability of, for example, a power facility that comprises more than one type of power and/or process plant that operate synergistically to generate power, power products, by-products, and waste. The gaseous products from gasifier 134 are channeled through a conduit 142 to burners 108, to an on-site load 144 such as a gas turbine engine or combined cycle plant, or may be used as a reburning fuel to reduce emissions of nitrogen oxides in on-site boiler 104 or duct 115.
In one example, gasifier 134 may be formed from stainless steel and its inner walls are refractory lined. Heat required for solid fuel gasification is supplied by for example, but not limited to natural gas and/or the partial oxidation of a solid carbonaceous fuel and an oxidizer such as air and/or oxygen. A horizontally aligned heating chamber 208 is coupled in flow communication to gasification chamber 202. Solid fuel 204 is injected into gasification chamber 202. A supply of nitrogen or air may be used as a transport media 210 for solid fuel 204.
Solid fuel 204 is injected at an upper end 212 of gasification chamber 202 through a water-jacketed solid fuel injector 203 using transport media 210 to carry the particles of solid fuel 204 into gasification chamber 202. The heat added to gasification chamber 202 causes the particles of solid fuel 204 to partially gasify, for example, by partial oxidation, and to generate reactive sorbent particles. The walls of gasification chamber 202 and auxiliary heat chamber 208 are refractory lined 214 to resist the heat generated within gasification chamber 202.
Heat required for partial gasification of solid fuel 204 is provided by an auxiliary heat source 216 such as a burner and/or by partially combusting solid fuel 204 in gasification chamber 202. For example, a supply of natural gas 218 and air 220 are mixed in heat chamber 208 to generate heat that is provided to gasification chamber 202. Cooling ports 222 in heat chamber 208 channel a flow of cooling water 224 to cool a sidewall 226 of heat chamber 208 and solid fuel injector 203. The cooling of heat chamber 208 permits the temperature to be controlled to avoid excessive combustion of solid fuel 204 in gasification chamber 202. In various embodiments, the temperature in gasification chamber 202 is maintained in a range of approximately 1000 degrees to approximately 2000 degrees Fahrenheit.
Conditions in gasification chamber 202 are optimized to enhance the generation thermally activated sorbent having relatively high reactivity. For example, the sorbent may be produced to have a relatively large surface area and high carbon content. Process parameters in gasifier 134 include fuel residence time in gasification chamber 202, a stoichiometric ratio (SR) of carbon containing material to air, and a temperature in gasification chamber 202. By controlling these process parameters, the generation of reactive sorbent can be enhanced. Optimum process conditions in gasifier 134 are also affected by a type of solid fuel 204 and its reactivity.
The above-described embodiments of a method and system of reducing mercury emissions from a combustion system provides a cost-effective and reliable means generating a thermally activated sorbent material that can absorb mercury and remove it from the flue gas stream, storing the sorbent material for use in the combustion system at a later time, and using synthesis gas a reburn fuel to facilitate reducing NOx emissions from the combustion system. More specifically, the methods and systems described herein facilitate generating the sorbent material on-site in proximity to the combustion system. In addition, the above-described methods and systems facilitate matching a supply of sorbent material to a demand for the sorbent material in the combustion system and storing the sorbent material for periods of weeks or months to permit operating the power plant at times when the gasifier is not in service and also permits operating the gasifier to generate sorbent material when the power plant is not in service. Such flexibility in the dispatch of interrelated process plants facilitates increasing the availability and/or capability of, for example, a power facility that comprises more than one type of power and/or process plant that operate synergistically to generate power, power products, by-products, and waste. As a result, the methods and systems described herein facilitate reducing emissions from a combustion system in a cost-effective and reliable manner.
While the disclosure has been described in terms of various specific embodiments, it will be recognized that the disclosure can be practiced with modification within the spirit and scope of the claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4196173 | deJong et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4233274 | Allgulin | Nov 1980 | A |
4273747 | Rasmussen | Jun 1981 | A |
4602573 | Tanca | Jul 1986 | A |
4814152 | Yan | Mar 1989 | A |
4843102 | Horton | Jun 1989 | A |
4987115 | Michel-Kim | Jan 1991 | A |
5141724 | Audeh et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5409522 | Durham et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5413477 | Moreland | May 1995 | A |
5507238 | Knowles | Apr 1996 | A |
5572938 | Leger | Nov 1996 | A |
5695726 | Lerner | Dec 1997 | A |
5787823 | Knowles | Aug 1998 | A |
6027551 | Hwang et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6206685 | Zamansky et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6280695 | Lissianski et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6439138 | Teller et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6451094 | Chang et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6471506 | Zamansky et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
6521021 | Pennline et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6558454 | Chang et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6595147 | Teller et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6604474 | Zamansky et al. | Aug 2003 | B2 |
6719828 | Lovell et al. | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6818043 | Chang et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6848374 | Srinivasachar et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
20010041157 | Spokoyny | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020029690 | Ridgeway et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020095866 | Hassett | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020102189 | Madden et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020166484 | Zamansky et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020170431 | Chang et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20030005634 | Calderon et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030009932 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030079606 | Katz | May 2003 | A1 |
20030091490 | Nolan et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030091948 | Bool, III et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099912 | Kobayaski et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030099913 | Kobayaski et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030104328 | Kobayaski et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030104937 | Sinha | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108470 | Spencer et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030108833 | Kobayaski et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030110994 | Lissianski et al. | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030143128 | Lanier et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030147793 | Breen et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030154858 | Kleut et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030185718 | Sellakumar | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040011057 | Huber | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20050274307 | Lissianski et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060120934 | Lanier et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20070116616 | Taylor | May 2007 | A1 |
20080011158 | Barger et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090211444 A1 | Aug 2009 | US |