Method and system for reducing toner rub-off in an electrophotographic apparatus by using printers' anti-offset spray powder

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6801746
  • Patent Number
    6,801,746
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, June 26, 2002
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 5, 2004
    21 years ago
Abstract
Apparatus and method for reducing toner rub-off from a copy made by an electrophotographic process wherein printers' anti-offset powder (e.g. finely-powdered starch) is sprayed onto the copy after the toner image has been fused to the copy. If a release oil is present on the copy, the powder is sprayed directly onto the release oil on the copy. To apply the powder, an applicator is positioned within the finishing section of the electrophotographic apparatus and sprays the copy with the powder as the copy exits the fuser section of the apparatus.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




The present invention relates to reducing toner rub-off in an electrophotographic apparatus and in one of its aspects relates to a method and a system for reducing toner rub-off in copies produced in an electrophotographic apparatus by spraying printers' anti-offset powder onto the copies after they pass through the fuser section of the apparatus but before they are stacked or otherwise finished.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




In a typical electrophotographic apparatus (e.g. copier), a continuous loop of photoconductor film or the like is commonly used to transfer an image from an input section onto a receiving medium (e.g. a sheet of paper or the like). The film is charged and passed through an input section where an image (i.e. analog or digital) is projected onto the charged film. The film then moves through a developing section where toner is applied to the charged image before the image is transferred to the sheet of paper. The paper is subsequently passed through a fuser section where the toner is typically fixed to the paper by passing the paper between two rollers, i.e. a pressure roller and a fuser roller, at least one of which is heated. Heat can be applied to either the inside or outside of the heated roller. One of the rollers typically has a compliant surface which deflects to form a fusing “nip” when the two rollers are pressed together.




A known problem in fuser sections of this type is one which is commonly referred to as “offset”. Offset occurs when some of the heat-softened toner particles remain on the fuser roller and are not fixed onto the paper as desired. As well understood in the art, this offset can severely affect the quality of the copies being made by the machine. To alleviate this problem, a release oil, e.g. silicone oil plus additives, is typically applied onto the fuser roller to prevent the toner from sticking thereto. Some of this release oil may also come off onto both the image and the blank areas of a copy as the copy passes through the nip between the rollers.




Also, since the toner used in these types of electrophotographic apparatus is only partially melted, the toner does not soak into the copy substrate as most inks do, even when the substrate is as absorbent as bond paper. Instead the toner forms a localized, raised portion in the image area on the copy substrate. If the desired image finish is very low in gloss, the image surface is also likely to be rough in order to scatter light.




Since the images on the copy substrate are raised and sometimes rough, they can be easily abraded or “rubbed off” during any one of several finishing processes which may be carried out in the finisher or finishing section of an electrophotographic apparatus after the copy has passed through the fuser section. These finishing processes may include one or more of the following: re-imaging (double-sided copying), folding, stapling, binding, collating, stacking, etc. Residue from this abrasion can cause objectionable marks on adjacent copies or covers which, in turn, can produce copies of unacceptable quality. This abrasion and associated defect is known in the art as “rub-off”. Since all that is needed to generate rub-off is a donor (toner image), a receptor, differential velocity between the donor and receptor, and load between the donor and receptor, rub-off is common, in varying degrees, in most, if not all, electrophotographic copiers of this type.




Basically speaking, the mechanisms of rub-off are consistent with those found in abrasive and adhesive wear. Accordingly, several of the factors that influence abrasive and/or adhesive wear also influence toner rub-off. Such factors include (a) toughness of the toner; (b) the coefficient of friction of the toner; (c) how well the toner is attached to the substrate and to itself; (d) the coefficient of friction and surface topography of the toner image; (e) the level of load and relative velocity of the wearing surfaces; and (f) the characteristics of the wearing surfaces.




More specifically, (1) tougher toner with a lower coefficient of friction, (2) a toner that fuses better or is fused better, (3) a smoother image finish, and/or (4) a lower coefficient of friction of the finished image will all reduce toner rub-off. Unfortunately, however, there are certain drawbacks associated with each of these factors. For example, a tougher toner is not only more expensive to grind, it is also more difficult to grind and maintain the extremely small particle sizes that are most desirable for such toners.




Further, when the coefficient of friction of the toner is reduced by adding wax, the charging behavior of the toner may become inconsistent leading to copies of differing quality. Still further, toner that fuses better is more likely to fuse in certain subsystems of the copier apparatus (e.g. developer and cleaning stations) where it should not fuse causing obvious problems. Also, using better-fusing toner and/or increasing heat on the fusing roller can cause more toner to stick to the fuser roller and/or increase the tendency of fused copies to stick to each other in the finisher or output trays. Likewise, providing a smoother toner image surface can increase image gloss to an unacceptable level while increasing the use of fuser release oil can cause undesirable effects in the rest of the electrophotographic process, especially when the copy is recycled in a two-sided copying process.




Some of the above mentioned factors are under the control of the apparatus and material manufacturers while others are under the control of the customer/end user. In any event, it should be readily recognized and appreciated by those familiar with this art that any reduction in toner rub-off which can be achieved with a minimum of expense and/or sacrifice to the operation and maintenance of the copier will be highly beneficial to all concerned.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




The present invention provides a method and apparatus for reducing toner rub-off from a copy made by an electrophotographic process. Basically printers' anti-offset powder (e.g. finely-powdered starch) is applied onto the copy after the copy has passed through the fuser section and the image has been fused to the copy. The powder may be sprayed onto either or both sides of the copy.




Typically, a release oil is applied to the fuser roller within the fuser section of a electrophotographic copier to aid in preventing toner from sticking to the fuser roller. As will be understood, some of this release oil will inherently be transferred to the copy as the copy passes over the fuser roller. Where release oil is present on the copy, the printers' anti-offset powder is sprayed directly over said fuser release oil on said copy and will stick thereto.




To apply the printers' anti-offset powder in the present invention, an applicator is positioned downstream of the fuser section (e.g. in the finishing section of the electrophotographic apparatus) which receives the copy after the copy has passed through the fuser section and a toner image has been fused onto the copy. As illustrated, the applicator is comprised of a container which is adapted to be positioned within the finishing section of the copier. The container is adapted to store a quantity of the printers' anti-offset powder. An air supply conduit, which is connected to an air supply at one end and closed at the other, passes through the container. The outer portion of the air supply conduit, having at least one exit therein, is configured so that it will be positioned substantially parallel to a copy as the copy passes from the fuser section and through the finishing section of the electrophotographic copier apparatus.




The air supply conduit has an inlet which is positioned within said container and provides an opening through which powder can be drawn into the air stream which is flowing through the conduit. The air supply also has an outlet positioned within the container and upstream from the inlet to supply air into said container under pressure to aerate and thereby suspend a portion of the powder within said container.




The air passing through the air supply conduit draws the suspended powder into the conduit through the inlet. The air stream then carries the suspended powder through the conduit to the outer portion thereof. The suspended powder then passes through exit(s) spaced along the length of the outer portion of the conduit and is sprayed directly onto the copy as the copy moves past the air supply conduit.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




The actual construction operation, and apparent advantages of the present invention will be better understood by referring to the drawings, not necessarily to scale, in which like numerals identify like parts and in which:





FIG. 1

is a schematic view of an electrophotographic copier apparatus in which the present invention is incorporated; and





FIG. 2

is a simplified, perspective view of an applicator which is used to apply printers' anti-offset powder to a copy to reduce toner rub-off in the apparatus of

FIG. 1

in accordance with the present invention.











While the invention will be described in connection with its preferred embodiments, it will be understood that this invention is not limited thereto. On the contrary, the invention is intended to cover all alternatives, modifications, and equivalents which may be included within the spirit and scope of the invention, as defined by the appended claims.




DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS




Referring to the drawings,

FIG. 1

schematically illustrates a typical electrophotographic apparatus or machine


10


(e.g. copier) of the kind that has an endless photoconductor member


11


(e.g. photographic film) which moves through a closed loop past a charging station


12


, an exposure or input station


13


, a developing station


14


, a transfer station


15


, and a cleaning section


16


. A copy substrate or medium (e.g. a sheet S of paper) is fed from a supply (not shown) through transfer station


15


where the toner image on the film


11


is transferred onto the paper S. The toner image is then fused onto the sheet S by applying heat and/or pressure thereto. For example, the paper S is typically fed between two rollers, e.g. a heated, fuser roller


21


and a pressure roller


22


in fuser section


20


to fix the toner image on the paper S.




As will be understood in the art, in fuser sections of this type, some of the toner particles are likely to adhere to fuser roller


21


(i.e. “toner offset”) which can severely affect the quality of the copies being made. To alleviate this problem, a “release” oil (e.g. silicone oil) is applied directly onto fuser roller


21


by means of a wick roller or the like (not shown). This oil prevents toner from sticking to the fuser roller. For a more detailed disclosure of a wick roller and its operation, see co-pending and commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/745,861, filed Dec. 21, 2000, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,430,385, and incorporated herein by reference. While some of the release oil will inherently transfer from fuser roller


21


to the sheet S as the sheet passes through the nip between the fusing rollers and will remain thereon for a period of time after fusing, the amount of oil is normally undetectable to the naked eye and in no way interferes with the quality of the copies.




Sheet S passes from fuser section


20


and into finisher or finishing section


23


of copier apparatus


10


. As used herein, “finisher” and “finishing section” is intended to mean any section which lies downstream from the fusing section. That is, the sheets may pass directly through finishing section


23


and into a tray


24


where they are stacked, one on top of the other, or the sheets S may undergo an additional finishing operation (e.g. re-imaging, stapling, collating, folding, mail-sorting, etc.) (none shown) within finishing section


23


before they finally exit into tray(s)


24


or like handling. As will be understood in the art, when the sheets S are stacked or otherwise finished, the bottom of one sheet (i.e. receptor) will move or rub across the top of an adjacent sheet (i.e. donor) at a differential velocity. It is during this time that “rub-off” normally occurs.




In accordance with the present invention, the magnitude of toner rub-off is substantially reduced by applying printers' anti-offset or set-off spray powder onto either or both sides of a copy after it exits the fuser section. The powder may be sprayed directly onto the back of a sheet (

FIG. 1

) or it may be sprayed directly onto the fused image on the sheet S after the sheet exits the fuser section


20


and before it undergoes further processing within the finishing section


23


of copier apparatus


10


. The anti-offset powder used in the present invention may be any of the powders (e.g. starch) which are commonly used in certain ink printing processes wherein a dry spray of the finely-grained powder is applied to freshly printed copies to prevent the wet ink from transferring from the top of one sheet to the bottom of the adjacent sheet.




More specifically, an applicator or dispensing system


30


is positioned in the finishing section


23


of copier


10


adjacent or near the outlet of the fuser section


20


. While the applicator


30


may take different forms, as illustrated in

FIG. 2

, its construction is similar to that of those typically used in the ink printing industry to apply printers' offset powder to freshly printed copies to keep wet ink from smearing as one copy is stacked onto an adjacent copy.




As shown in

FIG. 2

, applicator


30


is comprised of a container


31


which is adapted to receive and store a quantity of a printers' anti-offset spray powder


32


. As mentioned above, powder


32


may be selected from the type of finely-grained, powders commonly used in the ink printing industry to prevent undried ink from smearing. Preferably, this powder is a finely-grained, commercially-available starch (e.g. corn starch used in food products).




An air-supply conduit


33


passes through the upper portion of container


31


and is adapted to be connected at one end to a compressed air source (not shown) and is closed at the other end. Conduit


33


has an outlet tube


34


, positioned within container


31


, which extends downwardly into the container as shown in

FIG. 2

for a purpose to be described below. Conduit


33


also has an inlet


35


positioned within container


31


which is formed by an angled opening in the conduit just downstream of outlet


34


. The outer portion


36


of conduit


33


is configured so that it will be positioned substantially parallel to sheets S as they pass through finishing section


23


on a transport (e.g. endless belt


38


or the like). Outer portion


36


has a plurality of exit openings


40


(only some numbered for clarity) spaced along the length thereof.




As illustrated in

FIG. 2

, the exit openings


40


open downwardly towards the back side of sheets S. That is, when the sheet passes through fuser section


20


, the toner image will lie on the front of sheet S. While applying powder to the back side of the copy aids in reducing toner rub-off, there are instances where it may be preferred to spray the powder directly onto the front side containing the toner image. This is easily accomplished by (1) re-positioning tube


33


below sheet S in FIG.


1


and directing exits


40


upward toward the front side of the copy or (2) passing the sheet through an inverter before passing the copy under applicator


30


or (3) spraying both sides simultaneouly by providing duplicate tubes


33


, one over and one under a sheet S.




In operation, a sheet S of paper or the like is fed from a supply (not shown) through transfer station


15


where the toner image on the film


11


is transferred onto the paper S. The paper S is then fed between a heated fuser roller


21


and a pressure roller


22


in fuser section


20


to fix the toner image on the paper S. In some instances, the sheet S then passes into finishing section


23


where, in accordance with the present invention, it moves past the outer portion of conduit


36


.




As sheets S pass under outside portion


36


of conduit


33


, air is being supplied through conduit


33


. As the air in conduit


33


passes through container


31


, a portion of the air is diverted through outlet tube


34


to aerate the printers' anti-offset powder


32


(e.g. finely granulated starch) in the container, which in turn, causes some of the powder to become suspended therein. The remainder of the air passes over inlet


35


and on through conduit


33


at a relatively high pressure. As will be understood, in accordance with Bernoulli's principle, this, in effect, reduces the pressure within the tube at inlet


35


which, in turn, draws the suspended particles of powder


32


through inlet


35


and into the air stream flowing through conduit


33


. The air carries the powder through conduit


33


and out exits


40


onto a sheet S as the sheet passes through the finishing section


23


.




When the anti-offset powder


32


is brought into contact with a recently fused image on a sheet S, it has a tendency to stick to any of the high viscosity, fuser release oil which may have been transferred to the sheet in the fuser section


20


as described above. This significantly reduces the rub-off between the sheets S as they are finished and/or stacked in the finishing section of electrophotographic apparatus


10


. Further, in some cases, the anti-offset powder


32


can be applied to sheets S as they are stacked without relying on the powder sticking to the fuser release oil, if none is present. Still further, as described above, the powder can be applied to either or both sides of each sheet S depending on the finishing process being carried out by the copier.




In an abbreviated test of the present invention, an un-weighed amount of commercially available ARGO corn starch was sprinkled onto the imaged side of a portion of copies formed by a electrophotographic process using a roller fuser and release oil. Treated and untreated copies were then rubbed together using a standard “rub-off” process. The severity of toner rub-off of the sample copies treated with the corn starch was only 19% of the rub-off of the untreated sample copies, proving that application of the powdered starch can significantly reduce toner rub-off.



Claims
  • 1. A method for reducing toner rub-off from a copy made by an electrophotographic process, and comprising a substrate bearing a toner image on a first image-bearing side and having a second non-image-bearing side, said method comprising:applying toner to said substrate to form said toner image on said first image-bearing side; applying heat and/or pressure to said copy to fuse said toner image to said first image-bearing side of said substrate; and applying printers' anti-offset powder to said copy after said toner image has been fused to said second non-image-bearing side of said substrate to thereby reduce toner rub-off from said copy.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein said printer's anti-offset powder is finely-powdered starch.
  • 3. The method of claim 2 wherein said finely powdered starch is cornstarch.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein said printers' anti-offset powder is sprayed onto said copy.
  • 5. An electrophotographic apparatus having a finishing section for receiving a copy after a toner image has been fused thereon, said finishing section including an applicator for applying printers' anti-offset powder to said toner image on said copy after said copy enters said finishing section:a container adapted to store a quantity of said printers' anti-offset powder said printers' anti-offset powder comprising finely powdered starch; and an air supply conduit passing through said container, said conduit being adapted to be connected to an air supply at one end and closed at the other end; an inlet in said air supply conduit positioned within said container for receiving said powder into said conduit; said air supply conduit having an outer portion of its length adapted to lie substantially parallel to said copy as said copy passes through said finishing section; and at least one exit in said outer portion of said air supply conduit positioned to open towards said copy through which said printers' anti-offset powder will be sprayed onto said copy from said air supply conduit.
  • 6. The electrophotographic apparatus of claim 5 including:an outlet in said air supply conduit positioned within said container and upstream from said inlet to thereby supply air into said container to aerate said printers' anti-offset powder within said container.
RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is entitled to and hereby claims the benefit of the filing date of U.S. Provisional application No. 60/310,872 filed on Aug. 8, 2001.

US Referenced Citations (55)
Number Name Date Kind
3653932 Berry et al. Apr 1972 A
3715219 Kurz et al. Feb 1973 A
3984809 Dertouzos et al. Oct 1976 A
4000957 Ruhland Jan 1977 A
4250511 Stein et al. Feb 1981 A
4390369 Merritt et al. Jun 1983 A
4447818 Kurata et al. May 1984 A
4458253 Goff, Jr. et al. Jul 1984 A
4484948 Merritt et al. Nov 1984 A
4490731 Vaught Dec 1984 A
4568949 Muranaka Feb 1986 A
4659383 Lin et al. Apr 1987 A
4666757 Helinski May 1987 A
4721635 Helinski Jan 1988 A
4745420 Gerstenmaier May 1988 A
4836129 Dahlgren Jun 1989 A
4851045 Taniguchi Jul 1989 A
4869921 Gabel et al. Sep 1989 A
4889560 Jaeger et al. Dec 1989 A
4908669 Yamamoto Mar 1990 A
5006170 Schwarz et al. Apr 1991 A
5092235 Rise Mar 1992 A
5151120 You et al. Sep 1992 A
5182572 Merritt et al. Jan 1993 A
5185035 Brown et al. Feb 1993 A
5213271 Uribe et al. May 1993 A
5265536 Millard Nov 1993 A
5372852 Titterington et al. Dec 1994 A
5389958 Bui et al. Feb 1995 A
5495270 Burr et al. Feb 1996 A
5541624 Cooke et al. Jul 1996 A
5569540 Hirose et al. Oct 1996 A
5598195 Okamoto et al. Jan 1997 A
5672413 Taylor et al. Sep 1997 A
5827918 Titterington et al. Oct 1998 A
5830942 King et al. Nov 1998 A
5835833 Dalal et al. Nov 1998 A
5879790 Sogabe et al. Mar 1999 A
5922114 Sawada Jul 1999 A
5954865 Sawada Sep 1999 A
5958169 Titterington et al. Sep 1999 A
5964155 Platsch Oct 1999 A
5966150 Lester et al. Oct 1999 A
5980621 Inaishi et al. Nov 1999 A
5987301 Acquaviva Nov 1999 A
5994453 Banning et al. Nov 1999 A
6015847 Titterington et al. Jan 2000 A
6018005 Banning et al. Jan 2000 A
6022910 Nishizaki et al. Feb 2000 A
6028138 Hahn et al. Feb 2000 A
6037396 Sawada Mar 2000 A
6038998 Platsch Mar 2000 A
6048925 Titterington et al. Apr 2000 A
6057385 Syutara et al. May 2000 A
6063729 Eguchi et al. May 2000 A
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60/310872 Aug 2001 US