Method and system for reducing vehicle emissions using a sensor downstream of an emission control device

Abstract
A system and method is provided for controlling a lean-burn engine whose exhaust gas is directed through an exhaust treatment system which includes an emission control device that alternately stores and releases a selected constituent of the exhaust gas, such as NOx, based on engine operating conditions, and a downstream NOx sensor. The system estimates the concentration of NOx flowing into the device based on engine operating conditions while determining a value for the concentration of NOx flowing out of the device based upon the output signal generated by NOx sensor. A device purge event is scheduled when the device efficiency, calculated based on the NOx concentrations flowing into and out of the device, falls below a predetermined minimum efficiency value. The length of a purge event is determined as a function of an accumulated measure based on the difference between the NOx concentrations into and out of the device.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The invention relates to methods and systems for the treatment of exhaust gas generated by “lean burn” operation of an internal combustion engine which are characterized by reduced tailpipe emissions of a selected exhaust gas constituent.




2. Background Art




Generally, the operation of a vehicle's internal combustion engine produces engine exhaust that includes a variety of constituent gases, including carbon monoxide (CO), hydrocarbons (HC), and nitrogen oxides (NO


x


). The rates at which the engine generates these constituent gases are dependent upon a variety of factors, such as engine operating speed and load, engine temperature, spark timing, and EGR. Moreover, such engines often generate increased levels of one or more constituent gases, such as NO


x


, when the engine is operated in a lean-burn cycle, i.e., when engine operation includes engine operating conditions characterized by a ratio of intake air to injected fuel that is greater than the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio, for example, to achieve greater vehicle fuel economy.




In order to control these vehicle tailpipe emissions, the prior art teaches vehicle exhaust treatment systems that employ one or more three-way catalysts, also referred to as emission control devices, in an exhaust passage to store and release selected exhaust gas constituents, such as NO


x


, depending upon engine operating conditions. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,153 teaches an emission control device which stores exhaust gas NO


x


when the exhaust gas is lean, and releases previously-stored NO


x


when the exhaust gas is either stoichiometric or “rich” of stoichiometric, i.e., when the ratio of intake air to injected fuel is at or below the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. Such systems often employ open-loop control of device storage and release times (also respectively known as device “fill” and “purge” times) so as to maximize the benefits of increased fuel efficiency obtained through lean engine operation without concomitantly increasing tailpipe emissions as the device becomes “filled.” The timing of each purge event must be controlled so that the device does not otherwise exceed its capacity to store the selected exhaust gas constituent, because the selected constituent would then pass through the device and effect an increase in tailpipe emissions. The frequency of the purge is preferably controlled to avoid the purging of only partially filled devices, due to the fuel penalty associated with the purge event's enriched air-fuel mixture.




The prior art has recognized that the storage capacity of a given emission control device is itself a function of many variables, including device temperature, device history, sulfation level, and the presence of any thermal damage to the device. Moreover, as the device approaches its maximum capacity, the prior art teaches that the incremental rate at which the device continues to store the selected constituent, also referred to as the instantaneous efficiency of the device, may begin to fall. Accordingly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,153 teaches use of a nominal NO


x


-storage capacity for its disclosed device which is significantly less than the actual NO


x


-storage capacity of the device, to thereby provide the device with a perfect instantaneous NO


x


-retaining efficiency, that is, so that the device is able to store all engine-generated NO


x


as long as the cumulative stored NO


x


remains below this nominal capacity. A purge event is scheduled to rejuvenate the device whenever accumulated estimates of engine-generated NO


x


reach the device's nominal capacity.




The amount of the selected constituent gas that is actually stored in a given emission control device during vehicle operation depends on the concentration of the selected constituent gas in the engine feedgas, the exhaust flow rate, the ambient humidity, the device temperature, and other variables including the “poisoning” of the device with certain other constituents of the exhaust gas. For example, when an internal combustion engine is operated using a fuel containing sulfur, the prior art teaches that sulfur may be stored in the device and may correlatively cause a decrease in both the device's absolute capacity to store the selected exhaust gas constituent, and the device's instantaneous constituent-storing efficiency. When such device sulfation exceeds a critical level, the stored SO


x


must be “burned off” or released during a desulfation event, during which device temperatures are raised above perhaps about 650° C. in the presence of excess HC and CO. By way of example only, U.S. Pat. No. 5,746,049 teaches a device desulfation method which includes raising the device temperature to at least 650° C. by introducing a source of secondary air into the exhaust upstream of the device when operating the engine with an enriched air-fuel mixture and relying on the resulting exothermic reaction to raise the device temperature to the desired level to purge the device of SO


x


.




Thus, it will be appreciated that both the device capacity to store the selected exhaust gas constituent, and the actual quantity of the selected constituent stored in the device, are complex functions of many variables that prior art accumulation-model-based systems do not take into account. The inventors herein have recognized a need for a method and system for controlling an internal combustion engine whose exhaust gas is received by an emission control device which can more accurately determine the amount of the selected exhaust gas constituent, such as NO


x


, stored in an emission control device during lean engine operation and which, in response, can more closely regulate device fill and purge times to optimize tailpipe emissions.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




Under the invention, a method and system are provided for controlling an internal combustion engine that operates at a plurality of engine operating conditions characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures having different air-fuel ratios to generate engine exhaust gas, wherein the exhaust gas is directed through an exhaust treatment system including an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, and a sensor operative to generate an output signal representative of a concentration of the selected constituent in the exhaust gas, such as NO


x


, exiting the device. The method includes determining a first value representative of an instantaneous concentration of the selected constituent in the engine exhaust gas during a lean operating condition; determining a second value representative of the instantaneous concentration of the selected constituent exiting the device based on the output signal generated by the sensor; and selecting an engine operating condition as a function of the first and second values. More specifically, in a preferred embodiment, the first value is estimated using a lookup table containing mapped values for the concentration of the selected constituent in the engine feedgas as a function of instantaneous engine speed and load. A lean operating condition is terminated, and a rich operating condition suitable for purging the device of stored selected constituent is scheduled, when the device efficiency, calculated based on the first and second values, falls below a predetermined minimum efficiency value. In this manner, the storage of the selected constituent in the device and, hence, the “fill time” during which the engine is operated in a lean operating condition, is optimized without reliance upon an accumulation model, in the manner characteristic of the prior art.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, the method preferably includes calculating a differential value based on the first and second values, with the differential value being representative of the amount of the selected constituent instantaneously stored in the device; and the differential value is accumulated over time to obtain a first accumulated measure representative of the total amount of the selected constituent which has been stored in the device during lean engine operation. The method further preferably includes calculating the amount of fuel, in excess of the stoichiometric amount, which is necessary to purge the device of both stored selected constituent and stored oxygen, based on the first accumulated measure and a previously stored value representing the amount of excess fuel necessary to purge only stored oxygen from the device. The method also preferably includes accumulating a value representative of an instantaneous amount of fuel supplied to the engine in excess of a stoichiometric amount during a purge event to obtain a second accumulated measure; and terminating the purge event when the second accumulated measure exceeds the total excess fuel value. In this manner, the invention optimizes the amount of excess fuel used to purge the device and, indirectly, the device purge time.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, the method preferably includes selecting a device-desulfating engine operating condition when the device's calculated efficiency value falls below the minimum efficiency value and the first accumulated measure does not exceed a reference minimum-storage value for the selected constituent in the device. The method further preferably includes indicating device deterioration if a predetermined number of device-desulfating engine operating conditions are performed without any increase in a maximum value for the first accumulated measure.




In accordance with a further feature of the invention, the value representing the oxygen-only excess fuel amount is periodically updated using an adaption value which is itself generated by comparing the output signal of the sensor to a minimum-concentration reference value for the selected constituent upon terminating a scheduled purge. More specifically, the adaption value is generated as a function of any error between the output signal of the sensor and the minimum-concentration reference value.




The above object and other objects, features, and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS





FIG. 1

is a schematic of an engine system for the preferred embodiment of the invention;





FIG. 2

is a plot of both the output signal generated by a downstream exhaust gas constituent sensor, specifically, the system's NO


x


sensor, and the feedgas air-fuel ratio during cyclical operation of the engine between a lean operating condition and a device-purging rich operation condition; and





FIG. 3

is a flowchart illustrating the steps of the control process employed by the exemplary system.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)




Referring to

FIG. 1

, an exemplary control system


10


for a four-cylinder, direct-injection spark-ignition gasoline-powered engine


12


for a motor vehicle includes an electronic engine controller


14


having ROM, RAM and a processor (“CPU”) as indicated. The controller


14


controls the operation of a set of fuel injectors


16


. The fuel injectors


16


, which are of conventional design, are each positioned to inject fuel into a respective cylinder


18


of the engine


12


in precise quantities as determined by the controller


14


. The controller


14


similarly controls the individual operation, i.e., timing, of the current directed through each of a set of spark plugs


20


in a known manner.




The controller


14


also controls an electronic throttle


22


that regulates the mass flow of air into the engine


12


. An air mass flow sensor


24


, positioned at the air intake of engine's intake manifold


26


, provides a signal regarding the air mass flow resulting from positioning of the engine's throttle


22


. The air flow signal from the air mass flow sensor


24


is utilized by the controller


14


to calculate an air mass value which is indicative of a mass of air flowing per unit time into the engine's induction system.




A first oxygen sensor


28


coupled to the engine's exhaust manifold detects the oxygen content of the exhaust gas generated by the engine


12


and transmits a representative output signal to the controller


14


. The first oxygen sensor


28


provides feedback to the controller


14


for improved control of the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to the engine


12


, particularly during operation of the engine


12


at or near the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio which, for a constructed embodiment, is about 14.65. A plurality of other sensors, including an engine speed sensor and an engine load sensor, indicated generally at


29


, also generate additional signals in a known manner for use by the controller


14


.




An exhaust system


30


transports exhaust gas produced from combustion of an air-fuel mixture in each cylinder


18


through a pair of emission control devices


32


,


34


. A second oxygen sensor


38


, which may also be a switching-type HEGO sensor, is positioned in the exhaust system


30


between the first and second devices


32


,


34


. In a constructed embodiment, the first and second oxygen sensors


28


,


38


are “switching” heated exhaust gas oxygen (HEGO) sensors; however, the invention contemplates use of other suitable sensors for generating a signal representative of the oxygen concentration in the exhaust manifold and exiting the first device


32


, respectively, including but not limited to exhaust gas oxygen (EGO) type sensors, and linear-type sensors such as universal exhaust gas oxygen (UEGO) sensors.




In accordance with the invention, a NO


x


sensor


40


is positioned in the exhaust system


30


downstream of the second device


34


. The NO


x


sensor


40


generates an output signal CNOx which is representative of the instantaneous concentration of a selected exhaust gas constituent (NO


x


) in the exhaust gas exiting the second device


34


.

FIG. 2

contains a plot illustrating an exemplary output signal CNOx generated by the NO


x


sensor


40


during a cyclical operation of the engine


12


between a lean operating condition and a second device-purging rich operation condition, along with an exemplary output signal generated by the second oxygen sensor


38


representing the exhaust gas oxygen concentration immediately upstream of the second device


34


.




A flowchart illustrating the steps of the control process employed by the exemplary system


10


is shown in FIG.


3


. Specifically, upon commencing lean engine operation, the controller


14


estimates in step


310


the instantaneous concentration of “feedgas” NO


x


, i.e., the concentration of NO


x


in the engine exhaust as a result of the combustion of the air-fuel mixture with in the engine


12


, as a function of instantaneous engine operating conditions (


312


). By way of example only, in a preferred embodiment, the controller


14


retrieves a stored estimate for instantaneously feedgas NO


x


concentration from a look-up table stored in ROM, originally obtained from engine mapping data. Because the controller


14


receives the output signal generated by the downstream NO


x


sensor


40


in step


314


, which provides a direct measure of the NO


x


, concentration in the exhaust gas flowing out of the second device


34


in step


316


, the controller


14


calculates in step


318


both the instantaneous NO


x


-absorbing efficiency ENOx of the second device


34


, and an accumulated measure QNOx representative of the amount of NO


x


which has been absorbed or stored in the second device


34


(the difference between the estimated feedgas NO


x


concentration and the concentration of NO


x


exiting the second device


34


, accumulated over time).




The controller


14


then compares the instantaneous NO


x


-absorbing efficiency ENOx to a reference value ENOx_MIN in step


320


. If the instantaneous NO


x


-absorbing efficiency ENOx falls below the reference value ENOx_MIN, the controller


14


then compares in step


322


the instantaneous second device temperature T to predetermined values T_MIN and T_MAX for minimum and maximum device operating temperatures, respectively, to ensure that the low instantaneous device efficiency is not due to operating the second device


34


outside of its design temperature range. If the second device temperature T is not within the proper operating range, the controller


14


terminates lean engine operation, and a second device purge event is scheduled in step


324


.




If, however, the second device temperature T is within the proper operating range, the controller


14


then compares (in step


326


) the accumulated measure QNOx to a minimum reference value QNOx_MIN to rule out whether the low instantaneous device efficiency is the result of a nearly-full second device


34


. If the accumulated measure QNQx is greater than the minimum reference value QNOx_MIN, the controller


14


schedules a purge event in step


324


. If the accumulated measure QNOx is less than the minimum reference value QNOx_MIN, the low instantaneous device efficiency is the result of sulfur accumulation within the second device


34


, or other device deterioration. The controller


14


then schedules a desulfation event, as described more fully below.




Upon the scheduling of a purge event in step


324


, the controller


14


switches the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to each of the engine's cylinders from lean to rich. During the purge event, the controller


14


integrates over time the amount of “excess” fuel supplied to the engine, i.e., the amount which the supplied fuel (


327


) exceeds that which is required for stoichiometric engine operation, to obtain a representative excess fuel measure XSF in step


328


. In the meantime, the controller


14


calculates an excess fuel reference value XSF_MAX representing the amount of excess fuel that is required to purge the second device


34


of the calculated amount QNOx of stored NO


x


. More specifically, XSF_MAX is directly proportional to the quantity of NO


x


stored and is determined according to the following expression:








XSF









MAX=K×QNOx+XSF









OSC,








where K is a proportionality constant between the quantity of NO


x


stored and the amount of excess fuel; and




XSF_OSC is a previously-calculated value representative of the quantity of excess fuel required to release oxygen stored within the second device


34


, as discussed further below.




When the amount of excess fuel XSF delivered to the engine exceeds the calculated maximum value XSF_MAX in step


332


, the controller


14


terminates the purge event, whereupon the controller


14


returns engine operation to either a near-stoichiometric operation or, preferably, a lean operating condition.




The controller


14


periodically adapts (flag ADPFLG) a stored value XSF_OSC representative of the quantity of excess fuel required to release oxygen that was previously stored within the second device


34


during lean engine operation, using the following adaptive procedure starting at step


340


: when the NO


x


is completely purged from the second device


34


, the NO


x


concentration in the exhaust gas exiting the second device


34


and, hence, the output signal of the downstream NO


x


sensor


40


will fall below a predetermined reference value CNOX_MIN determined in step


342


or


343


. If the actual purge time is greater than the time required for the tailpipe NO


x


concentration to drop below the reference value CNOX_MIN, the controller


14


determines that the second device


34


has been “overpurged”, i.e., a greater amount of excess fuel has been provided than was otherwise necessary to purge the second device


34


of stored NO


x


and stored oxygen, and the controller


14


reduces the stored value XSF_OSC in steps


344


and


347


and then sets flag ADPPLG to 1 in step


345


. On the other hand, if the measured NO


x


concentration in the exhaust gas exiting the second device


34


does not fall below the reference value CNOx_MIN, the controller


14


determines that the second device


34


has not been fully purged of stored NO


x


and stored oxygen, and the stored value XSF_OSC is increased accordingly in step


346


.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, the controller


14


uses accumulated measure QNOx representative of the amount of NO


x


which has been absorbed or stored in the second device


34


for diagnostic purposes. For example, in a preferred embodiment, as described above, a second device desulfation event is preferably scheduled in step


348


when the second device's instantaneous efficiency ENOx drops below a minimum efficiency ENQx_MIN and the accumulated NO


x


-storage measure QNOx falls below a predetermined reference value QNQx_MIN, notwithstanding continued second device operation in the proper temperature range. Moreover, if the accumulated NO


x


-storage measure QNOx is still less than the reference value QNQx_MIN after completion of the desulfation event, a malfunction indicator code is triggered, and lean engine operation is terminated in step


350


. Also, flag DSOXFG is set in steps


352


and


354


.




Also, in steps


400


and


401


, parameters XSF, QNOx, and flags ADPFLG and DSOXFLG are set to zero. Then, DSOXFLG is checked at step


403


. A lean air/fuel is then set at step


405


.




While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method of controlling an engine that operates at a plurality of engine operating conditions characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures having different air-fuel ratios to generate engine exhaust gas, wherein the exhaust gas is directed through an exhaust treatment system including an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, and a sensor operative to generate an output signal representative of a concentration of the selected constituent in the exhaust gas exiting the device, the method comprising:determining a first value representative of an instantaneous concentration of the selected constituent in the engine exhaust gas when operating in the lean operating condition; determining a second value representative of the instantaneous concentration of the selected constituent exiting the device based on the output signal generated by the sensor; and selecting an engine operating condition as a function of the first and second values, wherein selecting includes calculating, during the lean operating condition, an efficiency value based on the first and second values; and terminating the lean operating condition when the efficiency value falls below a minimum efficiency value.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein determining the first value includes estimating the first value as a function of at least one of the group consisting of an engine speed and an engine load.
  • 3. A method of controlling an engine that operates at a plurality of engine operating conditions characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures having different air-fuel ratios to generate engine exhaust gas, wherein the exhaust gas is directed through an exhaust treatment system including an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, and a sensor operative to generate an output signal representative of a concentration of the selected constituent in the exhaust gas exiting the device, the method comprising:determining a first value representative of an instantaneous concentration of the selected constituent in the engine exhaust gas when operating in the lean operating condition; determining a second value representative of the instantaneous concentration of the selected constituent exiting the device based on the output signal generated by the sensor; and selecting an engine operating condition as a function of the first and second values, wherein selecting includes: calculating a differential value based on the first and second values; accumulating the differential value over time to obtain a first accumulated measure representative of an amount of the selected constituent stored in the device; calculating a total excess fuel value representative of an amount of fuel in excess of a stoichiometric amount of fuel that is required to release stored selected constituent and stored oxygen from the device as a function of the first accumulated measure and a previously stored oxygen-only excess fuel value representative of an amount of excess fuel required to release only stored oxygen from the device; and supplying an amount of fuel to the engine in excess of the stoichiometric amount based on the excess fuel value.
  • 4. The method of claim 3, wherein supplying includes:accumulating a value representative of an instantaneous amount of excess fuel supplied to the engine during a given engine operating condition to obtain a second accumulated measure; and terminating the given engine operating condition when the second accumulated measure exceeds the total excess fuel value.
  • 5. The method of claim 4, further including:comparing the output signal of the sensor to a minimum-concentration reference value upon terminating the given engine operating condition; and generating an adaption value for modifying the oxygen-only excess fuel value as a function of any error between the output signal of the sensor and the minimum-concentration reference value.
  • 6. The method of claim 3, wherein selecting includes:calculating, during the lean operating condition, a device efficiency value based on the first and second value; and selecting a device-desulfating engine operating condition when the efficiency value falls below a minimum efficiency value and the first accumulated measure does not exceed a reference minimum-storage value for the selected constituent in the device.
  • 7. The method of claim 6, further including indicating device deterioration if a predetermined number of device-desulfating engine operating conditions are performed without any increase in a maximum value for the first accumulated measure.
  • 8. A system for controlling an internal combustion engine that operates at a plurality of engine operating conditions characterized by combustion of air-fuel mixtures having different air-fuel ratios, wherein exhaust gas generated by such combustion is directed through an exhaust treatment system including an emission control device that stores a selected exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is lean and releases the stored selected constituent when the exhaust gas is rich, and a sensor operative to generate an output signal representative of a concentration of a selected constituent of the exhaust gas exiting the device, the system comprising:a controller including a microprocessor arranged to determine a first value representative of an instantaneous concentration of the selected constituent in the engine exhaust gas when operating in a lean operating condition, and to determine a second value representative of the instantaneous concentration of the selected constituent exiting the device based on the output signal generated by the sensor, and wherein the controller is further arranged to select an engine operating condition as a function of the first and second values, wherein the controller is further arranged to calculate a differential value based on the first and second values, to accumulate the differential value over time to obtain a first accumulated measure representative of an amount of the selected constituent stored in the device, to calculate a total excess fuel value representative of an amount of fuel in excess of a stoichiometric amount of fuel that is required to release stored selected constituent and stored oxygen from the device as a function of the first accumulated measure and a previously stored oxygen-only excess fuel value representative of an amount of excess fuel required to release only stored oxygen from the device, and to supply an amount of fuel to the engine in excess of the stoichiometric amount based on the excess fuel value.
  • 9. The system of claim 8, wherein the controller is further arranged to accumulate a value representative of an instantaneous amount of excess fuel supplied to the engine during a given engine operating condition to obtain a second accumulated measure, and to terminate the given engine operating condition when the second accumulated measure exceeds the total excess fuel value.
  • 10. The system of claim 9, wherein the controller is further arranged to compare the output signal of the sensor to a minimum-concentration reference value for the selected constituent upon terminating the given engine operating condition, and to generate an adaption value for modifying the oxygen-only excess fuel value as a function of any error between the output signal of the sensor and the minimum-concentration reference value.
  • 11. The system of claim 8, wherein the controller is further arranged to calculate, during the lean operating condition, a device efficiency value based on the first and second value, and to select a device-desulfating engine operating condition when the efficiency value falls below a minimum efficiency value and the first accumulated measure does not exceed a reference minimum-storage value for the selected constituent in the device.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the controller is further arranged to indicate device deterioration if a predetermined number of device-desulfating engine operating conditions are performed without any increase in a maximum value for the first accumulated measure.
US Referenced Citations (150)
Number Name Date Kind
3696618 Boyd et al. Oct 1972 A
3969932 Rieger et al. Jul 1976 A
4033122 Masaki et al. Jul 1977 A
4036014 Ariga Jul 1977 A
4167924 Carlson et al. Sep 1979 A
4178883 Herth Dec 1979 A
4186296 Crump, Jr. Jan 1980 A
4251989 Norimatsu et al. Feb 1981 A
4533900 Muhlberger et al. Aug 1985 A
4622809 Abthoff et al. Nov 1986 A
4677955 Takao Jul 1987 A
4854123 Inoue et al. Aug 1989 A
4884066 Miyata et al. Nov 1989 A
4913122 Uchida et al. Apr 1990 A
4964272 Kayanuma Oct 1990 A
5009210 Nakagawa et al. Apr 1991 A
5088281 Izutani et al. Feb 1992 A
5097700 Nakane Mar 1992 A
5165230 Kayanuma et al. Nov 1992 A
5174111 Nomura et al. Dec 1992 A
5189876 Hirota et al. Mar 1993 A
5201802 Hirota et al. Apr 1993 A
5209061 Takeshima May 1993 A
5222471 Stueven Jun 1993 A
5233830 Takeshima et al. Aug 1993 A
5267439 Raff et al. Dec 1993 A
5270024 Kasahara et al. Dec 1993 A
5272871 Oshima et al. Dec 1993 A
5325664 Seki et al. Jul 1994 A
5331809 Takeshima et al. Jul 1994 A
5335538 Blischke et al. Aug 1994 A
5357750 Ito et al. Oct 1994 A
5359852 Curran et al. Nov 1994 A
5377484 Shimizu Jan 1995 A
5402641 Katoh et al. Apr 1995 A
5410873 Tashiro May 1995 A
5412945 Katoh et al. May 1995 A
5412946 Oshima et al. May 1995 A
5414994 Cullen et al. May 1995 A
5419122 Tabe et al. May 1995 A
5423181 Katoh et al. Jun 1995 A
5426934 Hunt et al. Jun 1995 A
5433074 Seto et al. Jul 1995 A
5437153 Takeshima et al. Aug 1995 A
5448886 Toyoda Sep 1995 A
5448887 Takeshima Sep 1995 A
5450722 Takeshima et al. Sep 1995 A
5452576 Hamburg et al. Sep 1995 A
5472673 Goto et al. Dec 1995 A
5473887 Takeshima et al. Dec 1995 A
5473890 Takeshima et al. Dec 1995 A
5483795 Katoh et al. Jan 1996 A
5531972 Rudy Jul 1996 A
5544482 Matsumoto et al. Aug 1996 A
5551231 Tanaka et al. Sep 1996 A
5554269 Joseph et al. Sep 1996 A
5569848 Sharp Oct 1996 A
5577382 Kihara et al. Nov 1996 A
5595060 Togai et al. Jan 1997 A
5598703 Hamburg et al. Feb 1997 A
5617722 Takaku Apr 1997 A
5622047 Yamashita et al. Apr 1997 A
5626014 Hepburn et al. May 1997 A
5626117 Wright et al. May 1997 A
5655363 Ito et al. Aug 1997 A
5657625 Koga et al. Aug 1997 A
5693877 Ohsuga et al. Dec 1997 A
5713199 Takeshima et al. Feb 1998 A
5715679 Asanuma et al. Feb 1998 A
5722236 Cullen et al. Mar 1998 A
5724808 Ito et al. Mar 1998 A
5729971 Matsuno et al. Mar 1998 A
5732554 Sasaki et al. Mar 1998 A
5735119 Asanuma et al. Apr 1998 A
5737917 Nagai Apr 1998 A
5740669 Kinugasa et al. Apr 1998 A
5743084 Hepburn Apr 1998 A
5743086 Nagai Apr 1998 A
5746049 Cullen et al. May 1998 A
5746052 Kinugasa et al. May 1998 A
5752492 Kato et al. May 1998 A
5771685 Hepburn Jun 1998 A
5771686 Pischinger et al. Jun 1998 A
5778666 Cullen et al. Jul 1998 A
5792436 Feeley et al. Aug 1998 A
5802843 Kurihara et al. Sep 1998 A
5803048 Yano et al. Sep 1998 A
5806306 Okamoto et al. Sep 1998 A
5813387 Minowa et al. Sep 1998 A
5831267 Jack et al. Nov 1998 A
5832722 Cullen et al. Nov 1998 A
5842339 Bush et al. Dec 1998 A
5842340 Bush et al. Dec 1998 A
5862661 Zhang et al. Jan 1999 A
5865027 Hanafusa et al. Feb 1999 A
5867983 Otani Feb 1999 A
5877413 Hamburg et al. Mar 1999 A
5910096 Hepburn et al. Jun 1999 A
5929320 Yoo Jul 1999 A
5934072 Hirota et al. Aug 1999 A
5938715 Zhang et al. Aug 1999 A
5953907 Kato et al. Sep 1999 A
5966930 Hatano et al. Oct 1999 A
5970707 Sawada et al. Oct 1999 A
5974788 Hepburn et al. Nov 1999 A
5974791 Hirota et al. Nov 1999 A
5974793 Kinugasa et al. Nov 1999 A
5974794 Gotoh et al. Nov 1999 A
5979161 Hanafusa et al. Nov 1999 A
5979404 Minowa et al. Nov 1999 A
5983627 Asik Nov 1999 A
5992142 Pott Nov 1999 A
5996338 Hirota Dec 1999 A
6003308 Tsutsumi et al. Dec 1999 A
6012282 Kato et al. Jan 2000 A
6012428 Yano et al. Jan 2000 A
6014859 Yoshizaki et al. Jan 2000 A
6023929 Ma Feb 2000 A
6026640 Kato et al. Feb 2000 A
6058700 Yamashita et al. May 2000 A
6073440 Douta et al. Jun 2000 A
6079204 Sun et al. Jun 2000 A
6092021 Ehlbeck et al. Jul 2000 A
6092369 Hosogai et al. Jul 2000 A
6101809 Ishuzuka et al. Aug 2000 A
6102019 Brooks Aug 2000 A
6105365 Deeba et al. Aug 2000 A
6119448 Emmerling et al. Sep 2000 A
6119449 Köhler Sep 2000 A
6128899 Oono et al. Oct 2000 A
6134883 Kato et al. Oct 2000 A
6138453 Sawada et al. Oct 2000 A
6145302 Zhang et al. Nov 2000 A
6145305 Itou et al. Nov 2000 A
6148611 Sato Nov 2000 A
6148612 Yamashita et al. Nov 2000 A
6161378 Hanaoka et al. Dec 2000 A
6161428 Esteghlal et al. Dec 2000 A
6164064 Pott Dec 2000 A
6189523 Weisbrod et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199373 Hepburn et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202406 Griffin et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205773 Suzuki Mar 2001 B1
6214207 Miyata et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216448 Schnaibel et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216451 Schnaibel et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233923 Itou et al. May 2001 B1
6237330 Takahashi et al. May 2001 B1
6244046 Yamashita Jun 2001 B1
6314723 Ketterer et al. Nov 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (19)
Number Date Country
196 07 151 Jul 1997 DE
0 351 197 Jan 1990 EP
0 444 783 Sep 1991 EP
0 503 882 Sep 1992 EP
0 508 389 Jan 1994 EP
62-97630 May 1987 JP
62-117620 May 1987 JP
64-53042 Mar 1989 JP
2-30915 Feb 1990 JP
2-33408 Feb 1990 JP
2-207159 Aug 1990 JP
3-135147 Jun 1991 JP
5-26080 Feb 1993 JP
5-106493 Apr 1993 JP
5-106494 Apr 1993 JP
6-58139 Mar 1994 JP
6-264787 Sep 1994 JP
7-97941 Apr 1995 JP
WO 9827322 Jun 1998 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (7)
Entry
C. D. De Boer et al., “Engineered Control Strategies for Improved Catalytic Control of NOx in Lean Burn Applications,” SAE Technical Paper No. 881595, Oct. 10-13, 1988.
Y. Kaneko et al., “Effect of Air-Fuel Ratio Modulation on Conversion Efficiency of Three-Way Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 780607, Jun. 5-9, 1978, pp. 119-127.
W. H. Holl, “Air-Fuel Control to Reduce Emissions I. Engine-Emissions Relationships,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800051, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
A. H. Meitzler, “Application of Exhaust-Gas-Oxygen Sensors to the Study of Storage Effects in Automotive Three-Way Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800019, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
J. Theis et al., “An Air/Fuel Algorithm to Improve the NOx Conversion of Copper-Based Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 922251, Oct. 19-22, 1992.
W. Wang, “Air-Fuel Control to Reduce Emissions, II. Engine-Catalyst Characterization Under Cyclic Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800052, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
T. Yamamoto et al., “Dynamic Behavior Analysis to Three Way Catalytic Reaction,” JSAE 882072-882166.