Method and system for reducing vehicle tailpipe emissions when operating lean

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6453666
  • Patent Number
    6,453,666
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, June 19, 2001
    23 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, September 24, 2002
    22 years ago
Abstract
A method and system for operating a lean-burn internal combustion engine in cooperation with an exhaust gas purification system having an emission control device, wherein the system includes a controller which calculates current levels of a selected exhaust gas constituent, such as NOx, during lean engine operating conditions based upon the difference between a determined instantaneous feedgas NOx concentration and a determined instantaneous device efficiency. The controller discontinues lean engine operation when the tailpipe NOx, expressed in terms of either grams-per-mile or grams-per-hour, exceeds a predetermined threshold level, either instantaneously or as averaged over the course of a device purge-fill cycle.
Description




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




1. Field of the Invention




The invention relates to methods and systems for controlling the operation of “lean-burn” internal combustion engines used in motor vehicles to obtain improvements in vehicle fuel economy.




2. Background Art




The exhaust gas generated by a typical internal combustion engine, as may be found in motor vehicles, includes a variety of constituents, including hydrocarbons (HC), carbon monoxide (CO), and nitrogen oxides (NO


x


). The respective rates at which an engine generates these constituents are typically dependent upon a variety of factors, including such operating parameters as air-fuel ratio (λ), engine speed and load, engine temperature, ambient humidity, ignition timing (“spark”), and percentage exhaust gas recirculation (“EGR”). The prior art often maps values for various of these “feedgas” constituents based, for example, on detected values for instantaneous engine speed and engine load.




In order to comply with modern restrictions regarding permissible levels of selected exhaust gas constituents, vehicle exhaust treatment systems often employ one or more three-way catalysts, referred to as an emission control device, disposed in an exhaust passage to store and release selected exhaust gas constituents, depending upon engine operating conditions. For example, U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,153 teaches an emission control device which stores exhaust gas NO


x


when the exhaust gas is lean, and releases previously-stored NO


x


when the exhaust gas is either stoichiometric or “rich” of stoichiometric, i.e., when the ratio of intake air to injected fuel is at or below the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. Significantly, a device's actual capacity to store a selected constituent gas, such as NO


x


, is often finite and, hence, in order to maintain low tailpipe NO


x


emissions, the device must be periodically cleansed or “purged” of stored NO


x


. The frequency or timing of each purge event must be controlled so that the device does not otherwise reach its actual NO


x


storage capacity, because engine-generated NO


x


would thereafter pass through the device and effect an increase in tailpipe NO


x


emissions. Further, the timing of each purge event is preferably controlled to avoid the purging of only partially-filled devices, due to the fuel penalty associated with the purge event's enriched air-fuel mixture and, particularly, the fuel penalty associated with the release of oxygen previously stored in any other upstream emission control device.




In response, U.S. Pat. No. 5,473,887 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,153 teach use of NO


x


-estimating means which seeks to estimate the cumulative amount of NO


x


which has been generated by the engine and, presumptively, has been stored in the device during a given lean operating condition. The incremental amount of NO


x


believed to have been generated and stored in the device is obtained from a lookup table based on engine speed, or on engine speed and load (the latter perhaps itself inferred, e.g., from intake manifold pressure). However, the disclosed NO


x


-estimating means fails to account for any instantaneous reduction in device efficiency, i.e., the device's ability to store an additional amount of feedgas NO


x


. The disclosed NO


x


-estimating means further fails to account for the device's initial storage of oxygen which likewise reduces the device's overall NO


x


-storing capacity.




The prior art has also recognized that the device's actual or maximum capacity to store selected exhaust gas constituents is often function of many variables, including device temperature, device history, sulfation level, and thermal damage, i.e., the extent of damage to the device's constituent-storing materials due to excessive heat. See, e.g., U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,153, which further teaches that, as the device approaches its maximum capacity, the incremental rate at which the device stores NO


x


may begin to fall. Accordingly, U.S. Pat. No. 5,437,153 teaches use of a nominal NO


x


capacity which is significantly less than the actual NO


x


capacity of the device, to thereby theoretically provide the device with a perfect instantaneous NO


x


-storing efficiency, i.e., the device stores all engine-generated NO


x


, as long as stored NO


x


remains below the nominal capacity. A purge event is scheduled to rejuvenate the device whenever accumulated estimates of engine-generated NO


x


reach the nominal device capacity. Unfortunately, however, the use of such a fixed nominal NO


x


capacity necessarily requires a larger device, because this prior art approach relies upon a partial, e.g., fifty-percent NO


x


fill in order to ensure retention of engine-generated NO


x


.




When the engine is operated using a fuel containing sulfur, SO


x


accumulates in the device to cause a decrease in both the device's absolute capacity to store the selected exhaust gas constituent(s) and the device's instantaneous efficiency. When such device sulfation exceeds a critical level, the accumulated SO


x


must be “burned off” or released during a desulfation event, during which device temperatures are raised above perhaps about 650° C. in the presence of excess HC and CO. By way of example only, U.S. Pat. No. 5,746,049 teaches a device desulfation method which includes raising the device temperature to at least 650° C. by introducing a source of secondary air into the exhaust upstream of the NO


x


device when operating the engine with an enriched air-fuel mixture and relying on the resulting exothermic reaction to raise the device temperature to the desired level to purge the device of stored SO


x


.




Therefore, the inventors herein have recognized a need for a method and system for controlling the filling and purging of an emission control device with a selected exhaust gas constituent which can more accurately regulate overall tailpipe emissions of the exhaust gas constituent than prior art methods and systems.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




In accordance with the invention, a method is provided for controlling the operation of a lean-burn internal combustion engine, the exhaust gas from which is directed through an exhaust treatment system including an emission control device that stores an exhaust gas constituent during lean engine operation and releases previously-stored exhaust gas constituent during engine operation at or rich of stoichiometry. Under the invention, during lean engine operation, the method includes determining a value representing an incremental amount, in grams per second, of a selected exhaust gas constituent, such as NO


x


, present in the engine feedgas as a function of current values for engine speed, engine load or torque, and the lean operating condition's air-fuel ratio. The method also includes determining a value representing the incremental amount of the exhaust gas constituent (e.g, NO


x


) being instantaneously stored in the device, preferably, as a function of device temperature, the amount of the constituent that is already stored in the device, an amount of sulfur which has accumulated within the device, and a value representing device aging (the latter being caused by a permanent thermal aging of the device or the diffusion of sulfur into the core of the device material which cannot be purged).




The method further includes calculating a value representing instantaneous tailpipe emissions of the exhaust gas constituent (e.g., NO


x


) based on the difference between the feedgas value and the incremental constituent-storage value; comparing the instantaneous tailpipe constituent emissions value to a predetermined threshold value; and discontinuing the lean engine operating condition when the instantaneous tailpipe constituent emissions value exceeds the predetermined threshold level, either instantaneously or as averaged over the course of a device purge-fill cycle, whose duration is determined by a timer which is nominally reset to zero upon commencement of an immediately prior rich engine operating condition.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, in a preferred embodiment, the method further includes generating a value representative of the cumulative number of miles that the vehicle has traveled during a given device purge-fill cycle; and determining a value representing average tailpipe constituent emissions in grams per mile using the instantaneous tailpipe constituent emissions value and the accumulated mileage value.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, an exemplary method further includes determining a need for releasing previously-stored exhaust gas constituent from the device; and deselecting the device-filling lean engine operation in response to the determined need. More specifically, under the invention, determining the need for releasing previously-stored exhaust gas constituent includes calculating a value representing the cumulative amount of the constituent that has been stored in the device during a given lean operation condition, based on the incremental constituent-storage value; determining a value representing an instantaneous constituent-storage capacity for the device; and comparing the cumulative constituent-storage value to the instantaneous constituent-storage capacity value. In a preferred embodiment, the step of determining the instantaneous constituent-storage capacity value includes estimating an amount of sulfur which has accumulated within the device.




Other objects, features and advantages of the present invention are readily apparent from the following detailed description of the best mode for carrying out the invention when taken in connection with the accompanying drawings.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWING




The Drawing is a schematic of an exemplary system for practicing the invention.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT(S)




Referring to the Drawing, an exemplary control system


10


for a four-cylinder, gasoline-powered engine


12


for a motor vehicle includes an electronic engine controller


14


having ROM, RAM and a processor (“CPU”) as indicated, as well as an engine-off timer that provides a value for the elapsed time since the engine


12


was last turned off as a variable, “soak time.” The controller


14


controls the operation of each of a set of fuel injectors


16


. The fuel injectors


16


, which are of conventional design, are each positioned to inject fuel into a respective cylinder


18


of the engine


12


in precise quantities as determined by the controller


14


. The controller


14


similarly controls the individual operation, i.e., timing, of the current directed through each of a set of spark plugs


20


in a known manner.




The controller


14


also controls an electronic throttle


22


that regulates the mass flow of air into the engine


12


. An air mass flow sensor


24


, positioned at the air intake of engine's intake manifold


26


, provides a signal regarding the air mass flow resulting from positioning of the engine's throttle


22


. The air flow signal from the air mass flow sensor


24


is utilized by the controller


14


to calculate an air mass value AM which is indicative of a mass of air flowing per unit time into the engine's induction system.




A first oxygen sensor


28


coupled to the engine's exhaust manifold detects the oxygen content of the exhaust gas generated by the engine


12


and transmits a representative output signal to the controller


14


. The first oxygen sensor


28


provides feedback to the controller


14


for improved control of the air-fuel ratio of the air-fuel mixture supplied to the engine


12


, particularly during operation of the engine


12


at or near the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio (λ=1.00). A plurality of other sensors, including an engine speed sensor and an engine load sensor, indicated generally at


30


, also generate additional signals in a known manner for use by the controller


14


.




An exhaust system


32


transports exhaust gas produced from combustion of an air-fuel mixture in each cylinder


18


through a pair of emission control device


34


,


36


, each of which functions in a known manner to reduce the amount of a selected constituent of the engine-generated exhaust gas, such as NO


x


, exiting the vehicle tailpipe


38


during lean engine operation. A second oxygen sensor


40


, which may also be a switching-type HEGO sensor, is positioned in the exhaust system


32


between the two emission control devices


34


,


36


. A third oxygen sensor


42


, which likewise is a switching-type HEGO sensor, is positioned downstream of the device


36


. In accordance with another feature of the invention, a temperature sensor


43


generates a signal representing the instantaneous temperature T of the device


36


, also useful in optimizing device performance as described more fully below.




Upon commencing lean engine operation, the controller


14


adjusts the output of the fuel injectors


16


to thereby achieve a lean air-fuel mixture for combustion within each cylinder


18


having an air-fuel ratio greater than about 1.3 times the stoichiometric air-fuel ratio. In accordance with the invention, for each subsequent background loop of the controller


14


during lean engine operation, the controller


14


determines a value representing the instantaneous rate FG_NOX_RATE at which NO


x


is being generated by the engine


12


as a function of instantaneous engine operating conditions, which may include, without limitation, engine speed, engine load, air-fuel ratio, EGR, and spark.




By way of example only, in a preferred embodiment, the controller


14


retrieves a stored estimate FG_NOX_RATE for the instantaneous NO


x


-generation rate from a lookup table stored in ROM based upon sensed values for engine speed N and engine load LOAD, wherein the stored estimates FG_NOX_RATE are originally obtained from engine mapping data.




During a first engine operating condition, characterized by combustion in the engine


12


of a lean air-fuel mixture (e.g., λ>1.3), the controller


14


determines incremental or delta feedgas emissions from the engine, in grams/hr, generated since the last time through this loop, and preferably expressed by the following relationship:






FG_NOX_RATE=FNXXX1(N,LOAD)*FNXXA(λ)*FNXXB(EGRACT)*FNXXC(SPK_DELTA)*FMXXD(ECT-200)






where:




FNXXX


1


(N,LOAD) is a lookup table containing NO


x


emission rate values in gram/hr for current engine speed N and engine load LOAD;




FNXXA(λ) is a lookup table for adjusting the FG_NOX_RATE value for air-fuel which inherently adjusts the FG_NOX_RATE value for barometric pressure;




FNXXB(EGRACT) is a lookup table for adjusting the FG_NOX_RATE value for actual exhaust gas recirculation percentage;




FNXXC(SPK_DELTA) is a lookup table for adjusting the FG_NOX_RATE value for the effect of knock sensor or hot open-loop induced spark retard, with NO


x


production being reduced with greater spark retard; and




FMXXD(ECT-200) is a lookup table for adjusting the FG_NOX_RATE value for the effect of engine coolant temperature above 200° F.




Preferably, the determined feedgas NO


x


rate FG_NOX_RATE is further modified to reflect any reduction in feedgas NO


x


concentration upon passage of the exhaust gas through the upstream emission control device


34


, as through use of a ROM-based lookup table of three-way catalyst efficiency in reducing NO


x


as a function of the current air-fuel ratio λ, to obtain an adjusted instantaneous feedgas NO


x


rate ADJ_FG_NOX_RATE. The adjusted feedgas NO


x


rate is accumulated over the length of time t


i,j


that the engine


12


is operated within a given engine speed/load cell for which the feedgas NO


x


generation rate R


i,j


applies, which is typically assumed to be the duration of the control process's nominal background loop, to obtain a value representing an instantaneous amount ADJ_FG_NOX of feedgas NO


x


entering the device during the background loop.




Also during the lean operating condition, the controller


14


calculates an instantaneous value INCREMENTAL_NOX representing the incremental amount of NO


x


stored in the device


36


during each background loop executed by the controller


14


during a given lean operating condition, in accordance with the following formula:






INCREMENTAL_NOX=ADJ_FG_NOX_RATE*t


i,j


*μ,






where:




μ represents a set of adjustment factors for instantaneous device temperature T, open-loop accumulation of SO


x


in the device


36


(which, in a preferred embodiment, is itself generated as a function of fuel flow and device temperature T), desired device utilization percentage, and a current estimate of the cumulative amount of NO


x


which has already been stored in the device


36


during the given lean operating condition. The controller


14


thereafter calculates a value INST_TP_NOX based on the difference between the adjusted instantaneous feedgas NO


x


value ADJ_FG_NOX and the instantaneous value INCREMENTAL_NOX representing the incremental amount of NO


x


stored in the downstream emission control device


36


. The controller


14


then compares the value INST_TP_NOX to a predetermined threshold level MAX_TP_NOX. If the controller


14


determines that the value INST_TP_NOX exceeds the predetermined threshold level MAX_TP_NOX, the controller


14


immediately discontinues the on-going lean engine operating condition in favor of either near-stoichiometric engine operating condition or a device-purging rich engine operating condition.




In accordance with another feature of the invention, an exemplary method includes generating a value representing a cumulative number of miles that the vehicle has traveled during a given device purge-fill cycle, i.e., since the commencement of an immediately prior device-purging rich engine operating condition; and determining a value representing average tailpipe NO


x


. emissions in grams per mile using the third value and the accumulated mileage value. More specifically, when the system


10


is initially operated with a lean engine operating condition, the efficiency of the downstream device


36


is very high, and the tailpipe NO


x


. emissions are correlatively very low. As the downstream device


36


fills, the efficiency of the downstream device


36


begins to fall, and the tailpipe NO


x


emissions value INST_TP_NOX will slowly rise up towards the threshold value MAX_TP_NOX. However, since the initial portion of the lean engine operating condition was characterized by very low tailpipe NO


x


emissions, the lean engine operating condition can be maintained for some time after the instantaneous value INST_TP_NOX exceeds the threshold value MAX_TP_NOX before average tailpipe NO


x


emissions exceed the threshold value MAX_TP_NOX. Moreover, since a purge event is likewise characterized by very low instantaneous tailpipe NO


x


emissions, average tailpipe NO


x


. emissions are preferably calculated using a time period which is reset at the beginning of the immediately prior purge event.




To the extent that the calculated tailpipe NO


x


. emissions does not exceed the predetermined threshold level, the controller


14


continues to track device fill time, as follows: the controller


14


iteratively updates a stored value TOTAL_NOX representing the cumulative amount of NO


x


which has been stored in the downstream device


44


during the given lean operating condition, in accordance with the following formula:






TOTAL_NOX−TOTAL_NOX+INCREMENTAL_NOX






The controller


14


further determines a suitable value NOX_CAP representing the instantaneous NO


x


-storage capacity estimate for the device


36


. By way of example only, in a preferred embodiment, the value NOX_CAP varies as a function of device temperature T, as further modified by an adaption factor K


i


periodically updated during fill-time optimization to reflect the impact of both temporary and permanent sulfur poisoning, device aging, and other device-deterioration effects.




The controller


14


then compares the updated value TOTAL_NOX representing the cumulative amount of NO


x


stored in the downstream device


36


with the determined value NOX_CAP representing the downstream device's instantaneous NO


x


-storage capacity. The controller


14


discontinues the given lean operating condition and schedules a purge event when the updated value TOTAL_NOX exceeds the determined value NOX_CAP.




For example, in a preferred embodiment, if the controller


14


determines that the value INST_TP_NOX exceeds the predetermined threshold level MAX_TP_NOX, the controller


14


immediately schedules a purge event using an open-loop purge time based on the current value TOTAL_NOX representing the cumulative amount of NO


x


which has been stored in the device


44


during the preceding lean operating condition. In this regard, it is noted that the instantaneous device temperature T, along with the air-fuel ratio and air mass flow rate employed during the purge event, are preferably taken into account in determining a suitable open-loop purge time, i.e., a purge time that is sufficient to release substantially all of the NO


x


and oxygen previously stored in the downstream device


36


.




As noted above, a temperature sensor directly measures the temperature T of the downstream device


36


; however, it will be appreciated that device temperature may be inferred, for example, in the manner disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,894,725 and U.S. Pat. No. 5,414,994, which disclosures are incorporated herein by reference.




If, at the end of the purge event, the controller


14


determines that the value INST_TP_NOX continues to exceed the predetermined threshold level MAX_TP_NOX, the controller


14


either selects a near-stoichiometric engine operating condition, or schedules another open-loop purge event.




Preferably, in accordance with another feature of the invention, the controller


14


initializes certain temperature and sulfur-accumulation variables in a manner to account for instances where an engine may be turned off for short periods of time in which the downstream device


36


may not have cooled to ambient temperature. More specifically, rather than resetting these variable to zero upon commencing lean engine operation, the controller


14


estimates these variables upon engine ignition as a function of respective values for the variables immediately preceding engine shutoff, ambient temperature, ambient humidity, and at least one respective calibratable time constant representing an amount of time for the variable to deteriorate to a value corresponding to the passage of a relatively large amount of time. Thus, for example, an initialization routine for a device temperature variable TEMP_INIT after a soak time SOAKTIME is preferably expressed as follows:






TEMP_INIT=((TEMP_PREVIOUS−AMBIENT)*FNEXP(−SOAKTIME/TEMP_TIME_CONST)






where:




TEMP_PREVIOUS is a value for device temperature T during the immediately preceding engine operating condition;




AMBIENT is a measured or inferred value representing current ambient temperature;




FNEXP is a lookup table value that approximates an exponential function;




SOAKTIME is the time elapsed since the engine was shut down, in seconds; and




TEMP_TIME_CONST is an empirically derived time constant associated with the cooling-off of the exhaust gas at an identified location on the downstream device


36


, in seconds.




While embodiments of the invention have been illustrated and described, it is not intended that these embodiments illustrate and describe all possible forms of the invention. Rather, the words used in the specification are words of description rather than limitation, and it is understood that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.



Claims
  • 1. A method for controlling the operation of a lean-burn internal combustion engine, the exhaust gas from the engine being directed through an exhaust purification system including an emission control device that stores a constituent of the exhaust gas when the exhaust gas is lean of stoichiometry and that releases stored exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is at or rich of stoichiometry, the method comprising:determining, during a lean engine operating condition, a first value representing an incremental amount of the exhaust gas constituent generated by the engine; determining a second value representing an incremental amount of the exhaust gas constituent being instantaneously stored in the device; calculating a third value based on a difference between the first value and the second value; averaging the third value over a first time period; and discontinuing the lean engine operating condition when the third value exceeds a predetermined threshold level.
  • 2. The method of claim 1, wherein the first time period is a running time period, and including resetting the first time period to zero upon commencement of a rich engine operating condition immediately prior to the lean engine operating condition.
  • 3. The method of claim 1, further including generating a fourth value representative of a cumulative number of miles that the vehicle has traveled during the first period, and determining a fifth value representing average tailpipe emissions of the exhaust gas constituent, in grams per mile, using the third value and the fifth value.
  • 4. The method of claim 1, wherein the first value is determined as a function of at least one of the group consisting of engine speed, engine load, and air-fuel ratio.
  • 5. The method of claim 1, further including:calculating a sixth value representing the cumulative amount of the exhaust gas constituent stored in the device during a lean operating condition based on the second value; and determining a seventh value representing an instantaneous constituent-storage capacity for the device, and wherein discontinuing includes comparing the sixth value to the seventh value.
  • 6. The method of claim 5, wherein calculating the sixth value includes determining an eighth value representing an amount of sulfur accumulated in the device.
  • 7. A system for controlling the operation of a lean-burn internal combustion engine, the exhaust gas from the engine being directed through an exhaust purification system including an emission control device that stores a constituent gas of the exhaust gas when the exhaust gas is lean of stoichiometry and that releases stored exhaust gas constituent when the exhaust gas is at or rich of stoichiometry, the system comprising:a controller including a microprocessor arranged to determine, during a lean engine operating condition, a first value representing an incremental amount of the exhaust gas constituent generated by the engine and a second value representing an incremental amount of the exhaust gas constituent being instantaneously stored in the device, wherein the controller is further arranged to calculate a third value based on a difference between the first value and the second value, to average the third value over a first time period, and to discontinue the lean engine operating condition when the third value exceeds a predetermined threshold level.
  • 8. The system of claim 7, wherein the first time period is a running time period, and the controller is further arranged to reset the first time period to zero upon commencement of a rich engine operating condition immediately prior to the lean engine operating condition.
  • 9. The system of claim 7, wherein the controller is further arranged to generate a fourth value representing a cumulative number of miles that the vehicle has traveled during the first period, and to determine a fifth value representing average tailpipe emissions of the exhaust gas constituent, in grams per mile, using the third value and the fifth value.
  • 10. The system of claim 7, wherein the controller is further arranged to determine the first value as a function of at least one of the group consisting of engine speed, engine load, and air-fuel ratio.
  • 11. The system of claim 7, wherein the controller is further arranged to calculate a sixth value representing the cumulative amount of the exhaust gas constituent stored in the device during a lean operating condition based on the second value, to determine a seventh value representing an instantaneous constituent-storage capacity for the device, and to compare the sixth value to the seventh value.
  • 12. The system of claim 11, wherein the controller is further arranged to determine an eighth value representing an amount of sulfur accumulated in the device when determining the sixth value.
US Referenced Citations (152)
Number Name Date Kind
3696618 Boyd et al. Oct 1972 A
3969932 Rieger et al. Jul 1976 A
4033122 Masaki et al. Jul 1977 A
4036014 Ariga Jul 1977 A
4167924 Carlson et al. Sep 1979 A
4178883 Herth Dec 1979 A
4186296 Crump, Jr. Jan 1980 A
4251989 Norimatsu et al. Feb 1981 A
4533900 Muhlberger et al. Aug 1985 A
4622809 Abthoff et al. Nov 1986 A
4677955 Takao Jul 1987 A
4854123 Inoue et al. Aug 1989 A
4884066 Miyata et al. Nov 1989 A
4913122 Uchida et al. Apr 1990 A
4964272 Kayanuma Oct 1990 A
5009210 Nakagawa et al. Apr 1991 A
5088281 Izutani et al. Feb 1992 A
5097700 Nakane Mar 1992 A
5165230 Kayanuma et al. Nov 1992 A
5174111 Nomura et al. Dec 1992 A
5189876 Hirota et al. Mar 1993 A
5201802 Hirota et al. Apr 1993 A
5209061 Takeshima May 1993 A
5222471 Stueven Jun 1993 A
5233830 Takeshima et al. Aug 1993 A
5267439 Raff et al. Dec 1993 A
5270024 Kasahara et al. Dec 1993 A
5272871 Oshima et al. Dec 1993 A
5325664 Seki et al. Jul 1994 A
5331809 Takeshima et al. Jul 1994 A
5335538 Blischke et al. Aug 1994 A
5357750 Ito et al. Oct 1994 A
5359852 Curran et al. Nov 1994 A
5377484 Shimizu Jan 1995 A
5402641 Katoh et al. Apr 1995 A
5410873 Tashiro May 1995 A
5412945 Katoh et al. May 1995 A
5412946 Oshima et al. May 1995 A
5414994 Cullen et al. May 1995 A
5419122 Tabe et al. May 1995 A
5423181 Katoh et al. Jun 1995 A
5426934 Hunt et al. Jun 1995 A
5433074 Seto et al. Jul 1995 A
5437153 Takeshima et al. Aug 1995 A
5448886 Toyoda Sep 1995 A
5448887 Takeshima Sep 1995 A
5450722 Takeshima et al. Sep 1995 A
5452576 Hamburg et al. Sep 1995 A
5472673 Goto et al. Dec 1995 A
5473887 Takeshima et al. Dec 1995 A
5473890 Takeshima et al. Dec 1995 A
5483795 Katoh et al. Jan 1996 A
5531972 Rudy Jul 1996 A
5544482 Matsumoto et al. Aug 1996 A
5551231 Tanaka et al. Sep 1996 A
5554269 Joseph et al. Sep 1996 A
5569848 Sharp Oct 1996 A
5577382 Kihara et al. Nov 1996 A
5595060 Togai et al. Jan 1997 A
5598703 Hamburg et al. Feb 1997 A
5617722 Takaku Apr 1997 A
5622047 Yamashita et al. Apr 1997 A
5626014 Hepburn et al. May 1997 A
5626117 Wright et al. May 1997 A
5655363 Ito et al. Aug 1997 A
5657625 Koga et al. Aug 1997 A
5693877 Ohsuga et al. Dec 1997 A
5713199 Takeshima et al. Feb 1998 A
5715679 Asanuma et al. Feb 1998 A
5722236 Cullen et al. Mar 1998 A
5724808 Ito et al. Mar 1998 A
5729971 Matsuno et al. Mar 1998 A
5732554 Sasaki et al. Mar 1998 A
5735119 Asanuma et al. Apr 1998 A
5737917 Nagai Apr 1998 A
5740669 Kinugasa et al. Apr 1998 A
5743084 Hepburn Apr 1998 A
5743086 Nagai Apr 1998 A
5746049 Cullen et al. May 1998 A
5746052 Kinugasa et al. May 1998 A
5752492 Kato et al. May 1998 A
5771685 Hepburn Jun 1998 A
5771686 Pischinger et al. Jun 1998 A
5778666 Cullen et al. Jul 1998 A
5792436 Feeley et al. Aug 1998 A
5802843 Kurihara et al. Sep 1998 A
5803048 Yano et al. Sep 1998 A
5806306 Okamoto et al. Sep 1998 A
5813387 Minowa et al. Sep 1998 A
5831267 Jack et al. Nov 1998 A
5832722 Cullen et al. Nov 1998 A
5842339 Bush et al. Dec 1998 A
5842340 Bush et al. Dec 1998 A
5862661 Zhang et al. Jan 1999 A
5865027 Hanafusa et al. Feb 1999 A
5867983 Otani Feb 1999 A
5877413 Hamburg et al. Mar 1999 A
5887421 Misutani Mar 1999 A
5894725 Cullen et al. Apr 1999 A
5910096 Hepburn et al. Jun 1999 A
5929320 Yoo Jul 1999 A
5934072 Hirota et al. Aug 1999 A
5938715 Zhang et al. Aug 1999 A
5953907 Kato et al. Sep 1999 A
5966930 Hatano et al. Oct 1999 A
5970707 Sawada et al. Oct 1999 A
5974788 Hepburn et al. Nov 1999 A
5974791 Hirota et al. Nov 1999 A
5974793 Kinugasa et al. Nov 1999 A
5974794 Gotoh et al. Nov 1999 A
5979161 Hanafusa et al. Nov 1999 A
5979404 Minowa et al. Nov 1999 A
5983627 Asik Nov 1999 A
5992142 Pott Nov 1999 A
5996338 Hirota Dec 1999 A
6003308 Tsutsumi et al. Dec 1999 A
6012282 Kato et al. Jan 2000 A
6012428 Yano et al. Jan 2000 A
6014859 Yoshizaki et al. Jan 2000 A
6023929 Ma Feb 2000 A
6026640 Kato et al. Feb 2000 A
6058700 Yamashita et al. May 2000 A
6073440 Douta et al. Jun 2000 A
6079204 Sun et al. Jun 2000 A
6092021 Ehlbeck et al. Jul 2000 A
6092369 Hosogai et al. Jul 2000 A
6101809 Ishuzuka et al. Aug 2000 A
6102019 Brooks Aug 2000 A
6105365 Deeba et al. Aug 2000 A
6119449 Köhler Sep 2000 A
6128899 Oono et al. Oct 2000 A
6134883 Kato et al. Oct 2000 A
6138453 Sawada et al. Oct 2000 A
6145302 Zhang et al. Nov 2000 A
6145305 Itou et al. Nov 2000 A
6148611 Sato Nov 2000 A
6148612 Yamashita et al. Nov 2000 A
6161378 Hanaoka et al. Dec 2000 A
6161428 Esteghlal et al. Dec 2000 A
6164064 Pott Dec 2000 A
6189523 Weisbrod et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199373 Hepburn et al. Mar 2001 B1
6202406 Griffin et al. Mar 2001 B1
6205773 Suzuki Mar 2001 B1
6214207 Miyata et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216448 Schnaibel et al. Apr 2001 B1
6216451 Schnaibel et al. Apr 2001 B1
6233923 Itou et al. May 2001 B1
6237330 Takahashi et al. May 2001 B1
6244046 Yamashita Jun 2001 B1
6343466 Mukaihira et al. Feb 2002 B1
6383267 Takaku et al. May 2002 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (18)
Number Date Country
196 07 151 Jul 1997 DE
0 351 197 Jan 1990 EP
0 444 783 Sep 1991 EP
0 503 882 Sep 1992 EP
0 508 389 Jan 1994 EP
62-97630 May 1987 JP
62-117620 May 1987 JP
64-53042 Mar 1989 JP
2-30915 Feb 1990 JP
2-33408 Feb 1990 JP
2-207159 Aug 1990 JP
3-135147 Jun 1991 JP
5-26080 Feb 1993 JP
5-106493 Apr 1993 JP
5-106494 Apr 1993 JP
6-58139 Mar 1994 JP
6-264787 Sep 1994 JP
7-97941 Apr 1995 JP
Non-Patent Literature Citations (7)
Entry
C. D. De Boer et al., “Engineered Control Strategies for Improved Catalytic Control of NOx in Lean Burn Applications,” SAE Technical Paper No. 881595, Oct. 10-13, 1988.
Y. Kaneko et al., “Effect of Air-Fuel Ratio Modulation on Conversion Efficiency of Three-Way Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 780607, Jun. 5-9, 1978, pp. 119-127.
W. H. Holl, “Air-Fuel Control to Reduce Emissions I. Engine-Emissions Relationships,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800051, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
A. H. Meitzler, “Application of Exhaust-Gas-Oxygen Sensors to the Study of Storage Effects in Automative Three-Way Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800019, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
J. Theis et al., “An Air/Fuel Algorithm to Improve the NOx Conversion of Copper-Based Catalysts,” SAE Technical Paper No. 922251, Oct. 19-22, 1992.
W. Wang, “Air-Fuel Control to Reduce Emissions, II. Engine-Catalyst Characterization Under Cyclic Conditions,” SAE Technical Paper No. 800052, Feb. 25-29, 1980.
T. Yamamoto et al., “Dynamic Behavior Analysis of Three Way Catalytic Reaction,” JSAE 882072-882166.