Method and system for reduction of decoding complexity in a communication system

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8730999
  • Patent Number
    8,730,999
  • Date Filed
    Friday, June 18, 2010
    14 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, May 20, 2014
    10 years ago
Abstract
Method and System for Utilization of an Outer Decoder in a Broadcast Services Communication System is described. Information to be transmitted is provided to a systematic portion of a plurality of transmit buffers and encoded by an outer decoder communicatively coupled to the transmit buffer. The resulting redundant bits are provided to a parity portion of each transmit buffer. The content of the transmit buffers, is multiplexed and encoded by an inner decoder to improve protection by adding redundancy. The receiving station recovers the transmitted information by an inverse process. Because a decoding complexity depends on the size of a systematic portion of the transmit buffer, reasoned compromise between a systematic portion size and number of transmit buffers yields decreased decoding complexity.
Description
BACKGROUND

1. Field


The present invention relates to communication systems. More particularly, the present invention relates to a system and method for reduction of decoding complexity in a communication system.


2. Background


Communication systems have been developed to allow transmission of information signals from an origination station to a physically distinct destination station. In transmitting information signal from the origination station over a communication channel, the information signal is first converted into a form suitable for efficient transmission over the communication channel. Conversion, or modulation, of the information signal involves varying a parameter of a carrier wave in accordance with the information signal in such a way that the spectrum of the resulting modulated carrier is confined within the communication channel bandwidth. At the destination station the original information signal is replicated from the modulated carrier wave received over the communication channel. Such a replication is generally achieved by using an inverse of the modulation process employed by the origination station.


Modulation also facilitates multiple-access, i.e., simultaneous transmission and/or reception, of several signals over a common communication channel. Multiple-access communication systems often include a plurality of subscriber units requiring intermittent service of relatively short duration rather than continuous access to the common communication channel. Several multiple-access techniques are known in the art, such as time division multiple-access (TDMA), frequency division multiple-access (FDMA), and amplitude modulation multiple-access (AM). Another type of a multiple-access technique is a code division multiple-access (CDMA) spread spectrum system that conforms to the “TIA/EIA/IS-95 Mobile Station-Base Station Compatibility Standard for Dual-Mode Wide-Band Spread Spectrum Cellular System,” hereinafter referred to as the IS-95 standard. The use of CDMA techniques in a multiple-access communication system is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 4,901,307, entitled “SPREAD SPECTRUM MULTIPLE-ACCESS COMMUNICATION SYSTEM USING SATELLITE OR TERRESTRIAL REPEATERS,” and U.S. Pat. No. 5,103,459, entitled “SYSTEM AND METHOD FOR GENERATING WAVEFORMS IN A CDMA CELLULAR TELEPHONE SYSTEM,” both assigned to the assignee of the present invention.


A multiple-access communication system may be a wireless or wire-line and may carry voice and/or data. An example of a communication system carrying both voice and data is a system in accordance with the IS-95 standard, which specifies transmitting voice and data over the communication channel. A method for transmitting data in code channel frames of fixed size is described in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,504,773, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR THE FORMATTING OF DATA FOR TRANSMISSION”, assigned to the assignee of the present invention. In accordance with the IS-95 standard, the data or voice is partitioned into code channel frames that are 20 milliseconds wide with data rates as high as 14.4 Kbps. Additional examples of a communication systems carrying both voice and data comprise communication systems conforming to the “3rd Generation Partnership Project” (3GPP), embodied in a set of documents including Document Nos. 3G TS 25.211, 3G TS 25.212, 3G TS 25.213, and 3G TS 25.214 (the W-CDMA standard), or “TR-45.5 Physical Layer Standard for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum Systems” (the IS-2000 standard).


An example of a data only communication system is a high data rate (HDR) communication system that conforms to the TIA/EIA/IS-856 industry standard, hereinafter referred to as the IS-856 standard. This HDR system is based on a communication system disclosed in co-pending application Ser. No. 08/963,386, entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR HIGH RATE PACKET DATA TRANSMISSION,” filed Nov. 3, 1997, and assigned to the assignee of the present invention. The HDR communication system defines a set of data rates, ranging from 38.4 kbps to 2.4 Mbps, at which an access point (AP) may send data to a subscriber station (access terminal, AT). Because the AP is analogous to a base station, the terminology with respect to cells and sectors is the same as with respect to voice systems.


In a multiple-access communication system, communications between users are conducted through one or more base stations. A first user on one subscriber station communicates to a second user on a second subscriber station by transmitting data on a reverse link to a base station. The base station receives the data and can route the data to another base station. The data is transmitted on a forward link of the same base station, or the other base station, to the second subscriber station. The forward link refers to transmission from a base station to a subscriber station and the reverse link refers to transmission from a subscriber station to a base station. Likewise, the communication can be conducted between a first user on one subscriber station and a second user on a landline station. A base station receives the data from the user on a reverse link, and routes the data through a public switched telephone network (PSTN) to the second user. In many communication systems, e.g., IS-95, W-CDMA, IS-2000, the forward link and the reverse link are allocated separate frequencies.


The above described wireless communication service is an example of a point-to-point communication service. In contrast, broadcast services provide point-to-multipoint communication service. The basic model of a broadcast system consists of a broadcast net of users served by one or more central stations, which transmit information with a certain contents, e.g., news, movies, sports events and the like to the users. Each broadcast net user's subscriber station monitors a common broadcast forward link signal. Because the central station fixedly determines the content, the users are generally not communicating back. Examples of common usage of broadcast services communication systems are TV broadcast, radio broadcast, and the like. Such communication systems are generally highly specialized purpose-build communication systems. With the recent, advancements in wireless cellular telephone systems there has been an interest of utilizing the existing infrastructure of the—mainly point-to-point cellular telephone systems for broadcast services. (As used herein, the term “cellular” systems encompasses communication systems utilizing both cellular and PCS frequencies.)


The information signal to be exchanged among the terminals in a communication system is often organized into a plurality of packets. For the purposes of this description, a packet is a group of bytes, including data (payload) and control elements, arranged into a specific format. The control elements comprise, e.g., a preamble and a quality metric. The quality metric comprises, e.g., cyclical redundancy check (CRC), parity bit(s), and other types of metric known to one skilled in the art. The packets are then formatted to fit into a frame in accordance with a communication channel structure. The frame, appropriately modulated, traveling between the origination terminal and the destination terminal, is affected by characteristics of the communication channel, e.g., signal-to-noise ratio, fading, time variance, and other such characteristics. Such characteristics affect the modulated signal differently in different communication channels. Consequently, transmission of a modulated signal over a wireless communication channel requires different considerations than transmission of a modulated signal over a wire-like communication channel, e.g., a coaxial cable or an optical cable. In addition to selecting modulation appropriate for a particular communication channel, other methods for protecting the information signal have been devised. Such methods comprise, e.g., encoding, symbol repetition, interleaving, and other methods know to one of ordinary skill in the art. However, these methods increase overhead. Therefore, an engineering compromise between reliability of the information signal delivery and the amount of overhead must be made. Even with the above-discussed protection of information signal, the conditions of the communication channel can degrade to the point at which the destination station possibly cannot decode (erases) some of the packets. In data-only communications systems allowing a communication of a feedback from a destination terminal to the origination terminal, one cure is to re-transmit the non-decoded packets using an Automatic Retransmission reQuest (ARQ) made by the destination station to the origination station. However, under certain conditions, the ARQ may overload the communication system. Furthermore, as discussed in regards to broadcast communication systems, the subscribers do not communicate back to the base station. Consequently, other means of information protection are desirable.


A co-pending application Ser. No. 09/933,912, entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR UTILIZATION OF AN OUTER DECODER IN A BROADCAST SERVICES COMMUNICATION SYSTEM,” filed Aug. 20, 2001, and assigned to the assignee of the present invention, discussed in detail utilization of an outer decoder in a broadcast system. As described in the co-pending application Ser. No. 09/933,912, the bit stream of information to be transmitted is first encoded by an outer decoder and the encoded stream is then encoded by an inner encoder. As illustrated in FIG. 1, the bit stream of information to be transmitted 102, originating at higher layers, is provided to a transmit buffer 104. The transmit buffer is illustrated in more detail in FIG. 2. Referring to FIG. 2, the bits fill the systematic portion 204(1) of the transmit buffer 104 (of FIG. 1) row by row from left to right. The systematic portion 204(1) comprises k rows 208 of length L. Referring back to FIG. 1, once the systematic portion 204(4) (of FIG. 2) is full, the outer block encoder 106 is activated to perform column-wise encoding of the bits in the systematic portion 204(1) (of FIG. 2) to generate (n-k) additional rows 210 (of FIG. 2) of parity bits. This column-wise operation is performed column by column for binary outer code, i.e., m=1. For non-binary code, i.e., m>1, every m adjacent columns in a row are treated as a m-bit symbol. The m-bit symbols along the top k rows are read by the outer encoder to produce n-k m-bit symbols that fill the corresponding lower n-k rows of these columns.


The outer encoder comprises, e.g., a systematic Reed-Solomon (R-S) encoder. Referring back to FIG. 1, the content of the transmit buffer 104 is then provided to a physical layer 108. At the physical layer 108, the individual frames are encoded by an inner encoder (not shown), which results in encoded frames. The structure of the inner decoder may is well known to one of ordinary skills in the art. The systematic rows and the parity rows of the buffer may be interlaced during transmission to reduce the chance of large number of systematic rows erased when the total number of inner code erasure exceeds the outer code's correcting capability. The frames are further processed in accordance with a selected modulation scheme, e.g., cdma2000, WCDMA, UMTS, and other modulation schemes known to one of ordinary skills in the art. The processed frames are then transmitted over a communication channel 110.


The transmitted frames are received at the destination station and provided to a physical layer 112. At the physical layer 112, the individual frames are demodulated and provided to an inner decoder (not shown). The inner decoder decodes each frame, and if the decoding is successful, outputs a correctly decoded frame; or if the decoding is unsuccessful, declares an erasure. The success or failure of decoding must be determined with a high accuracy, achieved e.g., by including a long (for example, 16-bit) cyclic redundancy check (CRC) in the frame after outer encoding and before inner encoding. The included CRC obtained from the decoded frame is compared with a CRC calculated from the bits of the decoded frame, and if the two CRCs are identical, the decoding is declared successful.


If the inner decoder cannot decode the frame, the decoder declares an erasure, and provides an outer block decoder 116 with an indication that the frame is missing. The process continues until there are as many parity frames received correctly and passed to a parity portion 114(2) of a receive buffer 114, as there are erased systematic frames. The receiver stops the reception of any remaining frames and the outer decoder (not shown) is activated to recover the erased systematic frames. The recovered systematic frames are passed to the upper layer.


It is well known in the art that a decoding/error correcting computation complexity increases with increased values of the number of rows in the transmit buffer 104. Because the decoding/error correcting computation complexity affects hardware complexity at the receiving terminal as well as power consumption, there exists a need in the art for a method and system.


SUMMARY

Embodiments disclosed herein address the above stated needs by providing a method and a system executing the method by encoding systematic bits in each of a plurality of buffers with an outer code; multiplexing content of the plurality of buffers; and encoding said multiplexed content with an inner code to provide a set of frames.


In another aspect of the invention, the received set of frames is decoded by an inner decoder; the correctly decoded frames are de-multiplexed to a plurality of buffers; and the content of each buffer is further processed. If the systematic portion of a buffer has been decoded correctly, the processing comprises providing the content of the systematic portion to higher layers. Alternatively, if it is determined that decoding of the buffer content by an outer decoder recovers the systematic portion, the outer decoder is activated and the recovered content together with the correctly received content of the systematic portion are provided to higher layers.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 illustrates prior art physical layer processing;



FIG. 2 illustrates a transmit buffer;



FIG. 3 illustrates physical layer processing in accordance with one embodiment of the invention;





DETAILED DESCRIPTION
Definitions

The word “exemplary” is used herein to mean “serving as an example, instance, or illustration.” Any embodiment described herein as “exemplary” is not necessarily to be construed as preferred or advantageous over other embodiments.


The terms point-to-point communication is used herein to mean a communication between two subscriber stations over a dedicated communication channel.


The terms broadcast communication or point-to-multipoint communication are used herein to mean a communication wherein a plurality of subscriber stations are receiving communication from one source.


The term packet is used herein to mean a group of bits, including data (payload) and control elements, arranged into a specific format. The control elements comprise, e.g., a preamble, a quality metric, and others known to one skilled in the art. Quality metric comprises, e.g., a cyclical redundancy check (CRC), a parity bit, and others known to one skilled in the art.


The term access network is used herein to mean a collection of base stations (BS) and one or more base stations' controllers. The access network transports data packets between multiple subscriber stations. The access network may be further connected to additional networks outside the access network, such as a corporate intranet or the Internet, and may transport data packets between each access terminal and such outside networks.


The term base station is used herein to mean the hardware with which subscriber stations communicate. Cell refers to the hardware or a geographic coverage area, depending on the context in which the term is used. A sector is a partition of a cell. Because a sector has the attributes of a cell, the teachings described in terms of cells are readily extended to sectors.


The term subscriber station is used herein to mean the hardware with which an access network communicates. A subscriber station may be mobile or stationary. A subscriber station may be any data device that communicates through a wireless channel or through a wired channel, for example using fiber optic or coaxial cables. A subscriber station may further be any of a number of types of devices including but not limited to PC card, compact flash, external or internal modem, or wireless or wireline phone. A subscriber station that is in the process of establishing an active traffic channel connection with a base station is said to be in a connection setup state. A subscriber station that has established an active traffic channel connection with a base station is called an active subscriber station, and is said to be in a traffic state.


The term physical channel is used herein to mean a communication route over which a signal propagates described in terms of modulation characteristics and coding.


The term logical channel is used herein to mean a communication route within the protocol layers of either the base station or the subscriber station.


The term communication channel/link is used herein to mean a physical channel or a logical channel in accordance with the context.


The term reverse channel/link is used herein to mean a communication channel/link through which the subscriber station sends signals to the base station.


A forward channel/link is used herein to mean a communication channel/link through which a base station sends signals to a subscriber station.


The term soft hand-off is used herein to mean a communication between a subscriber station and two or more sectors, wherein each sector belongs to a different cell. The reverse link communication is received by both sectors, and the forward link communication is simultaneously carried on the two or more sectors' forward links.


The term softer hand-off is used herein to mean a communication between a subscriber station and two or more sectors, wherein each sector belongs to the same cell. The reverse link communication is received by both sectors, and the forward link communication is simultaneously carried on one of the two or more sectors' forward links.


The term erasure is used herein to mean failure to recognize a message.


The term dedicated channel is used herein to mean a channel modulated by information specific to an individual subscriber station.


The term common channel is used herein to mean a channel modulated by information shared among all subscriber stations.


The term physical layer is used exclusively herein to mean that part of the communication protocol between an origination terminal and a destination terminal that is responsible for the transmission and reception of data. The physical layer corresponds to Layer 1 in the International Standards Organization model for Open System Interconnection.


The term higher layer(s) is used exclusively herein to mean that part of the communication protocol between an origination terminal and a destination terminal that is above a physical layer. The higher layers correspond to Layers 2 through 7 in the International Standards Organization model for Open System Interconnection.


DESCRIPTION

In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, as illustrated in FIG. 3, the bit stream of information to be transmitted 302, originating at higher layers, is de-multiplexed and provided to transmit buffers 304(i). The bits fill the systematic portion 306(1) of the transmit buffer 304(1) row by row from left to right. The systematic portion 306(1) comprises k rows of length L. In one embodiment, the length L of the buffer coincides with the length of a radio frame without the overhead (e.g., CRC to help the inner decoder and the tail bits for the inner encoder). Once the systematic portion 306(1) of the transmit buffer 304(1) is full, the procedure is repeated for the remaining transmit buffers 304(2)-304(p). Once the systematic portions 306(i) of the transmit buffers 304(i) are full, the outer block encoders 310(i) are activated to perform column-wise encoding of the bits in the systematic portion 306(i) to generate (n-k) additional rows of parity bits 308(i). This column-wise operation is performed column by column for binary outer code, i.e., m=1. For non-binary code, i.e., m>1, every m adjacent columns in a row are treated as a m-bit symbol. The m-bit symbols along the top k rows are read by the outer encoder to produce n-k m-bit symbols that fill the corresponding lower n-k rows of these columns.


In another embodiment, the length L of the buffer is equal to the number of bits the radio frame without the overhead divided by m, the dimension of the outer encoder code. In this embodiment, the first m rows from the transmit buffers 304(i) are sent in the first radio frame, the second m rows of bits are sent in the second radio frame, until the entire buffer is transmitted. Once the systematic portion 306(1) of the transmit buffer 304(1) is full, the procedure is repeated for the remaining transmit buffers 304(2)-304(p). Once the systematic portions 306(i) of the transmit buffers 304(i) are full, the outer block encoders 310(i) are activated to perform column-wise encoding of the bits in the systematic portion 304(i) to generate m(n-k) additional rows of parity bits 308(i). This column-wise operation is performed column by column for binary outer code, i.e., m=1. For non-binary code, i.e., m>1, every m-rows of a column form a m-bit symbol. The k symbols from the top k m rows in the column are read by the outer encoder to produce (n-k) m-bit symbols that fill the corresponding lower m(n-k) rows of this column.


In one embodiment the outer encoders 310(i) comprise a systematic Reed-Solomon (R-S) encoder. The content of the transmit buffers 304(i) are then provided to an multiplexer 312. The multiplexer 312 cycles through the transmit buffers 304(1)-304(p), selecting a successive transmit buffer 304(i) after a block of bits containing a pre-determined number of bits has been sent form a previous buffer 304(i-1). In one embodiment, the pre-determined number of bits in a block equals L. This strategy intends to uniformly distribute corruption of data caused by disturbance of a physical channel 316 among the buffers 304(i). However, one of ordinary skills in the art understands that other multiplexing strategies are equally applicable, and can be utilized without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. The multiplexed blocks of bits are provided to a physical layer 314 of the originating terminal. At the physical layer 314, additional overhead bits (e.g., a CRC check) are added to each of the blocks of bits, and the resulting structure is encoded by an inner encoder (not shown), which results in encoded frames. The structure of the outer and inner encoders and the multiplexer may be, e.g., the structure of FIG. 3. The frames are further processed in accordance with a selected modulation scheme. In one embodiment, the processing is performed in accordance with the IS-2000 standard. The processed frames are then transmitted over a communication channel 316.


The transmitted frames are received at the destination station (not shown), and provided to a physical layer 318 at the destination station. At the physical layer 318, the individual frames are demodulated and provided to an inner decoder (not shown). In one embodiment, the inner decoder decodes each frame, and if the decoding is successful, outputs a correctly decoded frame; or if the decoding is unsuccessful, declares an erasure. The success or failure of decoding must be determined with a high accuracy. In one embodiment, the accuracy is achieved by including a long (for example, 16-bit) cyclic redundancy check (CRC) in the frame after outer encoding and before inner encoding as discussed above. However, one of ordinary skills in the art recognizes that other mechanisms for frame quality indication may be used. The included CRC obtained from the decoded frame is compared with a CRC calculated from the bits of the decoded frame, and if the two CRCs are identical, the decoding is declared successful. Further processing at the physical layer proceeds in accordance with the result of the inner decoder decision.


The correctly decoded frames are provided to a de-multiplexer 320 that distributes the correctly decoded frames among the receive buffers 322(i), utilizing an inverse method to the method used for multiplexing. If all the systematic k frames are correctly decoded by the inner decoder for a particular receive buffer 322(i), the systematic frames from the systematic portion 324(i) of the receive buffer 322(i) are provided to higher layers.


If the inner decoder cannot decode the frame, the decoder declares an erasure, and provides the de-multiplexer 324 with an indication that the frame is missing. The de-multiplexer 324 provides the information to the outer block decoder 328(i) communicatively coupled to the received buffer 322(i) to which the frame belonged. The process continues until there are enough systematic frames and correctly received parity frames accumulated in the systematic portion 324(i) and the parity portion 326(i) of the receive buffer 322(i), or until the receive buffer 322(i) is full. The outer decoder (not shown) is then activated to recover the erased systematic frames. The recovered systematic frames are provided to higher layers.


If the total number of correctly received frames in the receive buffer 322(i) is less than k, in accordance with one embodiment the outer decoder is not activated since there is no guarantee that the decoding would be successful. The correctly received systematic frames together with identification of the missing bits are provided to the higher layers. In another embodiment, the receiver uses decoded bits from the inner decoder (which are unreliable as indicated by the failed CRC checks) to recover bits for the systematic bits. In accordance with one embodiment, the receiver decodes the unreliable bits from the inner decoder and finds the most likely codeword. In the another embodiment, the receiver uses measurement of the signal quality of the erased frames in the buffer to choose enough erroneously received frames with the highest signal to noise ratio to form a sub buffer with k rows. The receiver then performs bit flipping (changing a bit value of 0 to a bit value 1 and vice versa at one column at a time) and checks whether the bit flipping resulted in a codeword. In one embodiment, the bit flipping is first performed on the least reliable bits and continues with bits in the order of the bits' increasing reliability. The reliability of a bit may be determined in accordance with inner decoding metrics, e.g., a signal to noise and interference ratio during the frame, like the Yamamoto metric, the re-encoded symbol error rate, re-encoded energy metric, and other metrics known to one of ordinary skills in the art, or the metrics' combinations. If a codeword was not found, the bit flipping continues through all the remaining columns for all the unreliable rows. If a codeword was not found, the bit flipping continues with increased number of bits flipped (that is, changing 2 bits at a time, then 3 bits, until the maximum number of bits), until either a codeword is found or all combinations are exhausted. In another embodiment, the CRC from the unreliable rows are used to check the overall success of the decoding in this situation. The frames are provided to the higher layers only if the CRC from all rows match; otherwise, only bits from reliable rows are provided to the higher layers.


To improve reliability of decoding, in another embodiment, the demodulation and inner decoding are performed for more than k correctly received frames in a buffer. In accordance in yet another embodiment the demodulation and inner decoding are performed for all frames in the buffer. In both embodiments, the outer decoding is performed on the k (or km) rows with the highest quality. The quality may be determined in accordance with inner decoding metrics, e.g., a signal to noise and interference ratio during the frame, like the Yamamoto metric, the re-encoded symbol error rate, re-encoded energy metric, and other metrics known to one of ordinary skills in the art, or the metrics' combinations. Use of quality metrics for quality estimation is disclosed in detail in U.S. Pat. No. 5,751,725 entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING THE RATE OF RECEIVED DATA IN A VARIABLE RATE COMMUNICATIONS SYSTEM” and U.S. Pat. No. 5,774,496 entitled “METHOD AND APPARATUS FOR DETERMINING DATA RATE OF TRANSMITTED VARIABLE RATE DATA IN A COMMUNICATIONS RECEIVER” and both are assigned to the assignee of the present invention.


One skilled in the art will appreciate that the number of transmit buffers 304, consequently, receive buffers 322 is a compromise between processing overhead and amount of potential data loss. A small value of k, resulting in more transmit/receive buffers causes increased processing overhead. On the other hand, a large value of k resulting in less transmit/receive buffers causes the transmit buffer size to increase, which leads to discarding a large block of data if the content of the transmit buffer cannot be recovered due to more than (n-k) row erasures. A large transmit buffer size also increases the memory requirement at the destination terminal.


Those of skill in the art would understand that information and signals may be represented using any of a variety of different technologies and techniques. For example, data, instructions, commands, information, signals, bits, symbols, and chips that may be referenced throughout the above description may be represented by voltages, currents, electromagnetic waves, magnetic fields or particles, optical fields or particles, or any combination thereof.


Those of skill would further appreciate that the various illustrative logical blocks, modules, circuits, and algorithm steps described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented as electronic hardware, computer software, or combinations of both. To clearly illustrate this interchangeability of hardware and software, various illustrative components, blocks, modules, circuits, and steps have been described above generally in terms of their functionality. Whether such functionality is implemented as hardware or software depends upon the particular application and design constraints imposed on the overall system. Skilled artisans may implement the described functionality in varying ways for each particular application, but such implementation decisions should not be interpreted as causing a departure from the scope of the present invention.


The various illustrative logical blocks, modules, and circuits described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be implemented or performed with a general purpose processor, a digital signal processor (DSP), an application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), a field programmable gate array (FPGA) or other programmable logic device, discrete gate or transistor logic, discrete hardware components, or any combination thereof designed to perform the functions described herein. A general purpose processor may be a microprocessor, but in the alternative, the processor may be any conventional processor, controller, microcontroller, or state machine. A processor may also be implemented as a combination of computing devices, e.g., a combination of a DSP and a microprocessor, a plurality of microprocessors, one or more microprocessors in conjunction with a DSP core, or any other such configuration.


The steps of a method or algorithm described in connection with the embodiments disclosed herein may be embodied directly in hardware, in a software module executed by a processor, or in a combination of the two. A software module may reside in RAM memory, flash memory, ROM memory, EPROM memory, EEPROM memory, registers, hard disk, a removable disk, a CD-ROM, or any other form of storage medium known in the art. An exemplary storage medium is coupled to the processor such the processor can read information from, and write information to, the storage medium. In the alternative, the storage medium may be integral to the processor. The processor and the storage medium may reside in an ASIC. The ASIC may reside in a user terminal. In the alternative, the processor and the storage medium may reside as discrete components in a user terminal.


The previous description of the disclosed embodiments is provided to enable any person skilled in the art to make or use the present invention. Various modifications to these embodiments will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art, and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to other embodiments without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention. Thus, the present invention is not intended to be limited to the embodiments shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.


A portion of the disclosure of this patent document contains material which is subject to copyright protection. The copyright owner has no objection to the facsimile reproduction by anyone of the patent document or the patent disclosure, as it appears in the Patent and Trademark Office patent file or records, but otherwise reserves all copyright rights whatsoever.

Claims
  • 1. A method for reducing decoding complexity, the method comprising: encoding systematic bits stored in each of a plurality of buffers with a first code, wherein the first code comprises a Reed-Solomon code and the encoding of the systematic bits generates Reed-Solomon encoded bits;multiplexing content in the plurality of buffers; andencoding said multiplexed content with a second code to provide a set of frames, wherein encoding the multiplexed content with the second code comprises adding overhead bits to the multiplexed content;wherein each of the plurality of buffers comprises a systematic buffer configured to store the systematic bits before and the Reed-Solomon encoded bits after the encoding of the systematic bits, and a parity buffer configured to store Reed-Solomon encoded bits when the systematic buffer is full.
  • 2. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said encoding systematic bits in each of the plurality of buffers with the first code comprises: encoding systematic bits in each row of the plurality of buffers using the Reed-Solomon code.
  • 3. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said encoding systematic bits in each of the plurality of buffers with the first code comprises: encoding systematic bits in each column of the plurality of buffers using the Reed-Solomon code.
  • 4. The method as claimed in claim 1 wherein said multiplexing content of the plurality of buffers comprises: providing a block of bits successively from each of the plurality of buffers.
  • 5. The method claimed in claim 4 wherein the block of bits comprises a row of each of the plurality of buffers.
  • 6. The method claimed in claim 1 wherein said encoding said multiplexed content with the second code to provide the set of frames comprises: identifying a block of bits to be encoded; andencoding the block of bits with the second code.
  • 7. The method claimed in claim 6 wherein said identifying the block of bits to be encoded comprises: identifying the block of bits received from one buffer.
  • 8. A method for reducing decoding complexity, comprising: encoding systematic bits stored in each of a plurality of transmit buffers with a first code, wherein the first code comprises a Reed-Solomon code and the encoding of the systematic bits generates Reed-Solomon encoded bits;multiplexing content in the plurality of transmit buffers;encoding said multiplexed content with a second code to provide a set of frames, wherein encoding the multiplexed content with the second code comprises adding overhead bits to the multiplexed content;transmitting the set of frames;decoding received frames by a second decoder;de-multiplexing correctly decoded frames to a plurality of receive buffers; andprocessing content of each of the plurality of receive buffers, said content of each of the plurality of receive buffers including a systematic portion and a parity portion,wherein each of the plurality of transmit buffers comprises a systematic buffer configured to store the systematic bits before and the Reed-Solomon encoded bits after the encoding of the systematic bits, and a parity buffer configured to store Reed-Solomon encoded bits when the systematic buffer is full.
  • 9. The method as claimed in claim 8 wherein said encoding systematic bits stored in each of the plurality of transmit buffers with the first code comprises: encoding systematic bits in each row of the plurality of buffers using the Reed-Solomon code.
  • 10. The method as claimed in claim 9 wherein said encoding systematic bits in each of the plurality of buffers using the Reed-Solomon code comprises: encoding systematic bits in each column of the plurality of buffers with a Reed-Solomon code.
  • 11. The method as claimed in claim 8 wherein said multiplexing content of the plurality of transmit buffers comprises: providing a block of bits successively from each buffer.
  • 12. The method claimed in claim 11 wherein the block of bits comprises a row of the transmitting buffer.
  • 13. The method claimed in claim 8 wherein said encoding said multiplexed content with the second code to provide the set of frames comprises: identifying a block of bits to be encoded; andencoding the block of bits with the second code.
  • 14. The method claimed in claim 13 wherein said identifying the block of bits to be encoded comprises: identifying the block of bits as one block of bits received from one buffer.
  • 15. The method as claimed in claim 8 wherein said de-multiplexing correctly decoded frame to the plurality of receive buffers comprises: identifying a block of bits belonging to one buffer; andproviding the block of bits to the buffer.
  • 16. The method as claimed in claim 15 wherein said identifying the block of bits belonging to the buffer comprises: identifying the block of bits as one block of bits comprising one frame decoded by the second decoder.
  • 17. The method as claimed in claim 8 wherein said processing content of each receive buffer comprises: providing the systematic portion of each receive buffer to layers higher than a physical layer.
  • 18. The method as claimed in claim 8 further comprising: providing indication of an erasure to a first decoder communicatively coupled to the plurality of receive buffers configured to receive one correctly decoded frame.
  • 19. The method as claimed in claim 18 wherein said processing content of each of the plurality of receive buffers comprises: decoding the systematic portion of one receive buffer by the first decoder when the systematic portion of the one receive buffer is recoverable; andproviding the decoded systematic portion of the one receive buffer to layers higher than a physical layer.
  • 20. An apparatus for reducing decoding complexity, comprising: a plurality of buffers;a plurality of encoders, each of said plurality of encoders being communicatively coupled to one of said plurality of buffers for encoding systematic bits stored in the one of said plurality of buffers using a Reed-Solomon code to generate Reed-Solomon encoded bits;a multiplexer communicatively coupled to said plurality of buffers for multiplexing content in the plurality of buffers; andan inner encoder communicatively coupled to said multiplexer for encoding said multiplexed content,wherein each of the plurality of buffers comprises a systematic buffer configured to store the systematic bits before and the Reed-Solomon encoded bits after the encoding of the systematic bits and a parity buffer configured to store Reed-Solomon encoded bits when the systematic buffer is full.
  • 21. The apparatus as claimed in claim 20 wherein each of said plurality of buffers is configured to: store systematic bits and parity bits.
  • 22. The apparatus as claimed in claim 20 wherein each of said plurality of encoders is configured to: encode systematic bits to provide parity bits.
  • 23. The apparatus as claimed in claim 22 wherein each of said plurality of encoders is configured to: encode the systematic bits using the Reed Solomon code.
  • 24. The apparatus as claimed in claim 20 wherein each of said plurality of encoders is configured to: encode the systematic bits using the Reed-Solomon code.
  • 25. The apparatus claimed in claim 20 wherein said multiplexer is configured to: provide a block of bits successively from each of said plurality of buffers to said inner encoder.
  • 26. The apparatus as claimed in claim 25 wherein said block of bits comprises a row of said buffer.
  • 27. The apparatus as claimed in claim 20 wherein said inner encoder is configured to: identify a block of bits to be encoded; andencode the block of bits with an inner code.
  • 28. The apparatus as claimed in claim 27 wherein said block of bits to be encoded comprises: one block of bits received from said multiplexer.
  • 29. An apparatus for reducing decoding complexity, comprising: a plurality of transmit buffers;a plurality of encoders, each of said plurality of encoders being communicatively coupled to one of said plurality of transmit buffers for encoding systematic bits stored in the respective transmit buffer using a Reed-Solomon code to generate Reed-Solomon encoded bits;a multiplexer communicatively coupled to said plurality of transmit buffers for multiplexing content in the plurality of transmit buffers;an inner encoder communicatively coupled to said multiplexer for encoding said multiplexed content, wherein encoding the multiplexed content comprises adding overhead bits to the multiplexed content;a first decoder;a de-multiplexer communicatively coupled to said first decoder;a plurality of receive buffers communicatively coupled to said demultiplexer, wherein content of each receive buffer includes systematic portion and parity portion; anda plurality of decoders, each of said plurality of decoders being communicatively coupled to one of said plurality of receive buffers,wherein each of the plurality of transmit buffers comprises a systematic buffer configured to store the systematic bits before and the Reed-Solomon encoded bits after the encoding of the systematic bits and a parity buffer configured to store Reed-Solomon encoded bits when the systematic buffer is full.
  • 30. The apparatus as claimed in claim 29 wherein each of said plurality of transmit buffers is configured to: store systematic bits and parity bits.
  • 31. The apparatus as claimed in claim 29 wherein each of said plurality of encoders is configured to: encode systematic bits to provide parity bits.
  • 32. The apparatus as claimed in claim 31 wherein each of said plurality of encoders is configured to: encode the systematic bits using the Reed-Solomon code.
  • 33. The apparatus as claimed in claim 29 wherein each of said plurality of encoders is configured to: encode the systematic bits with the Reed-Solomon code.
  • 34. The apparatus claimed in claim 29 wherein said multiplexer is configured to: provide a block of bits successively from each of said plurality of transmit buffers to said inner encoder.
  • 35. The apparatus as claimed in claim 34 wherein said block of bits comprises a row of said transmit buffer.
  • 36. The apparatus as claimed in claim 29 wherein said inner encoder is configured to: identify a block of bits to be encoded; andencode the block of bits with an inner code.
  • 37. The apparatus as claimed in claim 36 wherein the block of bits to be encoded comprises: one block of bits received from said multiplexer.
  • 38. The apparatus as claimed in claim 29 wherein said first decoder is configured to: decode a received frame;provide a correctly decoded frame; andprovide indication of an erasure if the received frame failed to decode correctly.
  • 39. The apparatus as claimed in claim 29 wherein said de-multiplexer is configured to: identify a block of bits belonging to a receive buffer; andprovide the block of bits to the receive buffer.
  • 40. The apparatus as claimed in claim 39 wherein said block of bits belonging to a receive buffer comprises: one block of bits comprising one frame decoded by said first decoder.
  • 41. The apparatus as claimed in claim 29 wherein each of said plurality of decoders is configured to: decode the systematic portion of the receive buffer by an outer decoder when the systematic portion is recoverable andproviding the decoded systematic portion of the receive buffer to layers higher than a physical layer.
  • 42. A memory encoded with codes for executing instruction to cause a processor to perform: encoding systematic bits stored in each of a plurality of buffers with a first code, wherein the first code comprises a Reed-Solomon code and the encoding of the systematic bits generates Reed-Solomon encoded bits;multiplexing content in the plurality of buffers; andencoding said multiplexed content with a second code to provide a set of frames, wherein encoding the multiplexed content with the second code comprises adding overhead bits to the multiplexed content;wherein each of the plurality of buffers comprises a systematic buffer configured to store the systematic bits before and the Reed-Solomon encoded bits after the encoding of the systematic bits, and a parity buffer configured to store Reed-Solomon encoded bits when the systematic buffer is full.
  • 43. A memory encoded with codes for executing instruction to cause a processor to perform: encoding systematic bits stored in each of a plurality of transmit buffers with a first code, wherein the first code comprises a Reed-Solomon code and the encoding of the systematic bits generates Reed-Solomon encoded bits;multiplexing content in the plurality of transmit buffers;encoding said multiplexed content with a second code to provide a set of frames, wherein encoding the multiplexed content with the second code comprises adding overhead bits to the multiplexed content;transmitting the set of frames;decoding received frames by a second decoder;de-multiplexing correctly decoded frames to a plurality of receive buffers; andprocessing content of each of the plurality of receive buffers, said content of each of the plurality of receive buffers including a systematic portion and a parity portion,wherein each of the plurality of transmit buffers comprises a systematic buffer configured to store the systematic bits before and the Reed-Solomon encoded bits after the encoding of the systematic bits, and a parity buffer configured to store Reed-Solomon encoded bits when the systematic buffer is full.
  • 44. An encoding apparatus for reducing decoding complexity, comprising: means for encoding systematic bits stored in each of a plurality of buffers with a first code, wherein the first code comprises a Reed-Solomon code and the encoding of the systematic bits generates Reed-Solomon encoded bits;means for multiplexing content in the plurality of buffers; andmeans for encoding said multiplexed content with a second code to provide a set of frames, wherein encoding the multiplexed content with the second code comprises adding overhead bits to the multiplexed content,wherein each of the plurality of buffers comprises a systematic buffer configured to store the systematic bits before and the Reed-Solomon encoded bits after the encoding of the systematic bits, and a parity buffer configured to store Reed-Solomon encoded bits when the systematic buffer is full.
CLAIM OF PRIORITY UNDER 35 U.S.C. §120

The present Application for patent is a Continuation and claims priority to patent application Ser. No. 12/683,256 filed on Jan. 6, 2010 and patent application Ser. No. 09/976,591 filed Oct. 12, 2001, now allowed, and assigned to the assignee hereof and hereby expressly incorporated by reference herein.

US Referenced Citations (378)
Number Name Date Kind
4163255 Pires Jul 1979 A
4323921 Guillou Apr 1982 A
4336612 Inoue et al. Jun 1982 A
4750167 Meyer Jun 1988 A
4870408 Zdunek et al. Sep 1989 A
4881263 Herbison et al. Nov 1989 A
4901307 Gilhousen et al. Feb 1990 A
RE33189 Lee et al. Mar 1990 E
4924513 Herbison et al. May 1990 A
5052000 Wang et al. Sep 1991 A
5056109 Gilhousen et al. Oct 1991 A
5101501 Gilhousen et al. Mar 1992 A
5103459 Gilhousen et al. Apr 1992 A
5117457 Comerford et al. May 1992 A
5136586 Greenblatt Aug 1992 A
5150412 Maru Sep 1992 A
5159447 Haskell et al. Oct 1992 A
5164988 Matyas et al. Nov 1992 A
5235631 Grube et al. Aug 1993 A
5237612 Raith Aug 1993 A
5241598 Raith Aug 1993 A
5253294 Maurer Oct 1993 A
5257396 Auld, Jr. et al. Oct 1993 A
5325357 Kimoto et al. Jun 1994 A
5351087 Christopher et al. Sep 1994 A
5353332 Raith et al. Oct 1994 A
5363379 Eckenrode et al. Nov 1994 A
5365572 Saegusa et al. Nov 1994 A
5369784 Nelson Nov 1994 A
5371794 Diffie et al. Dec 1994 A
5404563 Green et al. Apr 1995 A
5410602 Finkelstein et al. Apr 1995 A
5412655 Yamada et al. May 1995 A
5421006 Jablon et al. May 1995 A
5442626 Wei Aug 1995 A
5448568 Delpuch et al. Sep 1995 A
5467398 Pierce et al. Nov 1995 A
5473609 Chaney Dec 1995 A
5473642 Osawa et al. Dec 1995 A
5481613 Ford et al. Jan 1996 A
5485577 Eyer et al. Jan 1996 A
5504773 Padovani et al. Apr 1996 A
5513245 Mizikovsky et al. Apr 1996 A
5515441 Faucher May 1996 A
5537474 Brown et al. Jul 1996 A
5565909 Thibadeau et al. Oct 1996 A
5592470 Rudrapatna et al. Jan 1997 A
5659556 Denissen et al. Aug 1997 A
5673259 Quick, Jr. Sep 1997 A
5686963 Uz et al. Nov 1997 A
5708961 Hylton et al. Jan 1998 A
5729540 Wegrzyn Mar 1998 A
5740246 Saito Apr 1998 A
5748736 Mittra May 1998 A
5751707 Voit et al. May 1998 A
5751725 Chen May 1998 A
5758068 Brandt et al. May 1998 A
5758291 Grube et al. May 1998 A
5768276 Diachina et al. Jun 1998 A
5774496 Butler et al. Jun 1998 A
5778059 Loghmani et al. Jul 1998 A
5778069 Thomlinson et al. Jul 1998 A
5778187 Monteiro et al. Jul 1998 A
5787347 Yu et al. Jul 1998 A
5796829 Newby et al. Aug 1998 A
5835730 Grossman et al. Nov 1998 A
5850444 Rune Dec 1998 A
5850445 Chan et al. Dec 1998 A
5870474 Wasilewski et al. Feb 1999 A
5878141 Daly et al. Mar 1999 A
5881368 Grob et al. Mar 1999 A
5884196 Lekven et al. Mar 1999 A
5887252 Noneman Mar 1999 A
5909491 Luo Jun 1999 A
5923649 Raith Jul 1999 A
5936965 Doshi et al. Aug 1999 A
5940507 Cane et al. Aug 1999 A
5946316 Chen et al. Aug 1999 A
5956404 Schneier et al. Sep 1999 A
5956681 Yamakita Sep 1999 A
5970072 Gammenthaler, Jr. et al. Oct 1999 A
5970417 Toyryla et al. Oct 1999 A
5978386 Hamalainen et al. Nov 1999 A
5983099 Yao et al. Nov 1999 A
5983388 Friedman et al. Nov 1999 A
5990928 Sklar et al. Nov 1999 A
5991400 Kamperman Nov 1999 A
5991407 Murto Nov 1999 A
6006073 Glauner et al. Dec 1999 A
6014765 Maeda et al. Jan 2000 A
6018360 Stewart et al. Jan 2000 A
6021124 Haartsen Feb 2000 A
6026165 Marino et al. Feb 2000 A
6032197 Birdwell et al. Feb 2000 A
6044154 Kelly Mar 2000 A
6047071 Shah Apr 2000 A
6047395 Zook Apr 2000 A
6052812 Chen et al. Apr 2000 A
6055236 Nessett et al. Apr 2000 A
6055314 Spies et al. Apr 2000 A
6058289 Gardner et al. May 2000 A
6065061 Blahut et al. May 2000 A
6067290 Paulraj et al. May 2000 A
6073122 Wool Jun 2000 A
6081907 Witty et al. Jun 2000 A
6097817 Bilgic et al. Aug 2000 A
6098878 Dent et al. Aug 2000 A
6108424 Pitiot Aug 2000 A
6108706 Birdwell et al. Aug 2000 A
6111866 Kweon et al. Aug 2000 A
6122763 Pyndiah et al. Sep 2000 A
6128389 Chan et al. Oct 2000 A
6128490 Shaheen et al. Oct 2000 A
6148010 Sutton et al. Nov 2000 A
6157719 Wasilewski et al. Dec 2000 A
6172972 Birdwell et al. Jan 2001 B1
6185430 Yee et al. Feb 2001 B1
6195546 Leung et al. Feb 2001 B1
6199161 Ahvenainen Mar 2001 B1
6201961 Schindall et al. Mar 2001 B1
6208634 Boulos et al. Mar 2001 B1
6230024 Wang et al. May 2001 B1
6233234 Curry et al. May 2001 B1
6233341 Riggins May 2001 B1
6240091 Ginzboorg et al. May 2001 B1
6253069 Mankovitz Jun 2001 B1
6253326 Lincke et al. Jun 2001 B1
6256509 Tanaka et al. Jul 2001 B1
6266420 Langford et al. Jul 2001 B1
6272632 Carman et al. Aug 2001 B1
6295361 Kadansky et al. Sep 2001 B1
6310661 Arsenault Oct 2001 B1
6314095 Loa Nov 2001 B1
6343280 Clark Jan 2002 B2
6345307 Booth Feb 2002 B1
6353614 Borella et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363242 Brown, Jr. et al. Mar 2002 B1
6363480 Perlman Mar 2002 B1
6366776 Wright et al. Apr 2002 B1
6373829 Vilmur Apr 2002 B1
6374103 Kamel et al. Apr 2002 B1
6377810 Geiger et al. Apr 2002 B1
6385200 Erami et al. May 2002 B1
6385461 Raith May 2002 B1
6415312 Boivie Jul 2002 B1
6424717 Pinder et al. Jul 2002 B1
6424947 Tsuria et al. Jul 2002 B1
6434367 Kumar et al. Aug 2002 B1
6438612 Ylonen et al. Aug 2002 B1
6449491 Dailey Sep 2002 B1
6460156 Laukkanen et al. Oct 2002 B1
6463155 Akiyama et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473419 Gray et al. Oct 2002 B1
6473858 Shimomura et al. Oct 2002 B1
6477377 Backstrom et al. Nov 2002 B2
6490259 Agrawal et al. Dec 2002 B1
6502140 Boivie Dec 2002 B1
6507590 Terho et al. Jan 2003 B1
6510515 Raith Jan 2003 B1
RE38007 Tsukamoto et al. Feb 2003 E
6519266 Manning et al. Feb 2003 B1
6523069 Luczycki et al. Feb 2003 B1
6529740 Ganucheau, Jr. et al. Mar 2003 B1
6536041 Knudson et al. Mar 2003 B1
6538996 West et al. Mar 2003 B1
6539242 Bayley Mar 2003 B1
6542490 Ahmadvand et al. Apr 2003 B1
6542504 Mahler et al. Apr 2003 B1
6549771 Chang et al. Apr 2003 B2
6560206 Naden et al. May 2003 B1
6564211 Andreev et al. May 2003 B1
6567914 Just et al. May 2003 B1
6571109 Kim May 2003 B1
6574211 Padovani et al. Jun 2003 B2
6577734 Etzel et al. Jun 2003 B1
6577848 Gregg et al. Jun 2003 B1
6580756 Matsui et al. Jun 2003 B1
6598203 Tang Jul 2003 B1
6600745 Chopping Jul 2003 B1
6601068 Park Jul 2003 B1
6603857 Batten-Carew et al. Aug 2003 B1
6606706 Li Aug 2003 B1
6608841 Koodli Aug 2003 B1
6614804 McFadden et al. Sep 2003 B1
6633979 Smeets Oct 2003 B1
6640094 Tabeta Oct 2003 B1
6647000 Persson et al. Nov 2003 B1
6654384 Reza et al. Nov 2003 B1
6658463 Dillon et al. Dec 2003 B1
6658605 Yoshida et al. Dec 2003 B1
6665718 Chuah et al. Dec 2003 B1
6678856 Jordan et al. Jan 2004 B1
6680920 Wan Jan 2004 B1
6690795 Richards Feb 2004 B1
6704368 Nefedov Mar 2004 B1
6704369 Kawasaki et al. Mar 2004 B1
6707801 Hsu Mar 2004 B2
6711182 Gibbs et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714650 Maillard et al. Mar 2004 B1
6714784 Forssell et al. Mar 2004 B1
6721805 Bhagwat et al. Apr 2004 B1
6725459 Bacon Apr 2004 B2
6728226 Naito Apr 2004 B1
6731936 Chen et al. May 2004 B2
6735177 Suzuki May 2004 B1
6735190 Chuah et al. May 2004 B1
6738942 Sridharan et al. May 2004 B1
6751218 Hagirahim et al. Jun 2004 B1
6760602 Tangorra et al. Jul 2004 B2
6760752 Liu et al. Jul 2004 B1
6763025 Leatherbury et al. Jul 2004 B2
6765909 Sen et al. Jul 2004 B1
6766024 Rix Jul 2004 B1
6775303 Rustad et al. Aug 2004 B1
6781999 Eyuboglu et al. Aug 2004 B2
6788681 Hurren et al. Sep 2004 B1
6792048 Lee et al. Sep 2004 B1
6798791 Riazi et al. Sep 2004 B1
6801508 Lim Oct 2004 B1
6804520 Johansson et al. Oct 2004 B1
6810499 Sridharan et al. Oct 2004 B2
6819930 Laroia et al. Nov 2004 B1
6826406 Vialen et al. Nov 2004 B1
6829741 Khansari et al. Dec 2004 B1
6831910 Moon et al. Dec 2004 B1
6832314 Irvin Dec 2004 B1
6856800 Henry et al. Feb 2005 B1
6862684 DiGiorgio Mar 2005 B1
6870923 Yi Mar 2005 B2
6879573 Huo Apr 2005 B1
6879690 Faccin et al. Apr 2005 B2
6882850 McConnell et al. Apr 2005 B2
6882860 Kim Apr 2005 B1
6885874 Grube et al. Apr 2005 B2
6888899 Raleigh et al. May 2005 B2
6895216 Sato et al. May 2005 B2
6895546 Ivry May 2005 B2
6898285 Hutchings et al. May 2005 B1
6898640 Kurita et al. May 2005 B1
6909702 Leung et al. Jun 2005 B2
6915272 Zilliacus et al. Jul 2005 B1
6918035 Patel Jul 2005 B1
6920119 Rinchiuso Jul 2005 B2
6925285 Kim Aug 2005 B2
6944763 Asano et al. Sep 2005 B1
6952454 Jalali et al. Oct 2005 B1
6956833 Yukie et al. Oct 2005 B1
6959384 Serret-Avila Oct 2005 B1
6963544 Balachandran et al. Nov 2005 B1
6970689 Khorram Nov 2005 B2
6978143 Vialen Dec 2005 B1
6983410 Chen et al. Jan 2006 B2
6987982 Willenegger et al. Jan 2006 B2
6990680 Wugofski Jan 2006 B1
7016351 Farinacci et al. Mar 2006 B1
7024616 Ohira et al. Apr 2006 B2
7031666 Hsu Apr 2006 B2
7036023 Fries et al. Apr 2006 B2
7039180 Issaa et al. May 2006 B1
7046672 Liao et al. May 2006 B2
7058809 White et al. Jun 2006 B2
7069436 Akachi Jun 2006 B1
7072865 Akiyama Jul 2006 B2
7079502 Yamano et al. Jul 2006 B2
7079523 Nelson, Jr. et al. Jul 2006 B2
7096355 Marvit et al. Aug 2006 B1
7114175 Lahteenmaki Sep 2006 B2
7116892 Wajs Oct 2006 B2
7133353 Sourour et al. Nov 2006 B2
7134019 Shelest et al. Nov 2006 B2
7146130 Hsu et al. Dec 2006 B2
7177424 Furuya et al. Feb 2007 B1
7181620 Hur Feb 2007 B1
7184789 Leung et al. Feb 2007 B2
7185362 Hawkes et al. Feb 2007 B2
7197072 Hsu et al. Mar 2007 B1
7200230 Knauft Apr 2007 B2
7203314 Kahn et al. Apr 2007 B1
7209459 Kangas Apr 2007 B2
7215775 Noguchi et al. May 2007 B2
7219291 Adde et al. May 2007 B2
7237108 Medvinsky et al. Jun 2007 B2
7239704 Maillard et al. Jul 2007 B1
7266687 Sowa et al. Sep 2007 B2
7278164 Raiz et al. Oct 2007 B2
7280660 Salo et al. Oct 2007 B2
7290063 Kalliokulju et al. Oct 2007 B2
7301968 Haran et al. Nov 2007 B2
7308100 Bender et al. Dec 2007 B2
7349425 Leung et al. Mar 2008 B2
7352868 Hawkes et al. Apr 2008 B2
7376963 Kato et al. May 2008 B2
7599655 Agashe et al. Oct 2009 B2
7649829 Chen et al. Jan 2010 B2
7669104 Uchida et al. Feb 2010 B2
7693508 Leung et al. Apr 2010 B2
7697523 Leung et al. Apr 2010 B2
7742781 Chen et al. Jun 2010 B2
7792074 Chen et al. Sep 2010 B2
8077679 Leung Dec 2011 B2
8098818 Grilli et al. Jan 2012 B2
8121296 Hawkes et al. Feb 2012 B2
20010004761 Zehavi Jun 2001 A1
20010034254 Ranta Oct 2001 A1
20010036200 Nelson et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010036834 Das et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010055298 Baker et al. Dec 2001 A1
20020002541 Williams Jan 2002 A1
20020002674 Grimes et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020010681 Hillegass et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020014159 Tatsumi et al. Feb 2002 A1
20020023165 Lahr Feb 2002 A1
20020071558 Patel Jun 2002 A1
20020076195 Nakajima et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020080887 Jeong et al. Jun 2002 A1
20020091931 Quick, Jr. et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020102964 Park Aug 2002 A1
20020114469 Faccin et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020141371 Hsu Oct 2002 A1
20020141591 Hawkes et al. Oct 2002 A1
20020169724 Moroney et al. Nov 2002 A1
20020181423 Chen et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030014685 Chong, Jr. Jan 2003 A1
20030018891 Hall et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030028805 Lahteenmaki Feb 2003 A1
20030030581 Roy Feb 2003 A1
20030031322 Beckmann et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030035389 Chen et al. Feb 2003 A1
20030039237 Forslow Feb 2003 A1
20030054807 Hsu et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030072384 Chen et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030087653 Leung et al. May 2003 A1
20030101401 Salvi et al. May 2003 A1
20030123669 Koukoulidis et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030126440 Go et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030134655 Chen et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030135748 Yamada et al. Jul 2003 A1
20030157952 Sarkkinen et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030159029 Brown et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030217057 Kuroiwa et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040019787 Shibata Jan 2004 A1
20040022216 Shi Feb 2004 A1
20040095515 Tajima May 2004 A1
20040101138 Revital et al. May 2004 A1
20040107350 Wasilewski et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040120527 Hawkes et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040131185 Kakumer Jul 2004 A1
20040132402 Agashe et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040151317 Hyyppa et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040199474 Ritter Oct 2004 A1
20040202329 Jung et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040243808 Ishiguro et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040266391 Hafren Dec 2004 A1
20050008159 Grilli et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050010774 Rose et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050048963 Kubler et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050055551 Becker et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050063544 Uusitalo et al. Mar 2005 A1
20050108563 Becker et al. May 2005 A1
20050138379 Semple et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050144550 Jeon et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050165711 Hamatsu Jul 2005 A1
20050216731 Saito et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050238315 Kataoka Oct 2005 A1
20050271210 Soppera Dec 2005 A1
20060078000 Rinne et al. Apr 2006 A1
20060168446 Ahonen et al. Jul 2006 A1
20060171540 Lee et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060242412 Jung et al. Oct 2006 A1
20070038610 Omoigui Feb 2007 A1
20070116282 Hawkes et al. May 2007 A1
20070214482 Nguyen Sep 2007 A1
20070280169 Cam Winget Dec 2007 A1
20080226073 Hawkes et al. Sep 2008 A1
20100048206 Agashe et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100107041 Chen et al. Apr 2010 A1
20100142432 Leung et al. Jun 2010 A1
20110045864 Chen et al. Feb 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (232)
Number Date Country
2308405 Nov 2000 CA
1256599 Jun 2000 CN
1281561 Jan 2001 CN
0636963 Feb 1995 EP
0702477 Mar 1996 EP
0748058 Dec 1996 EP
0813309 Dec 1997 EP
0854618 Jul 1998 EP
0924898 Jun 1999 EP
0928084 Jul 1999 EP
0951198 Oct 1999 EP
0993128 Apr 2000 EP
0999656 May 2000 EP
1001570 May 2000 EP
1024661 Aug 2000 EP
1030484 Aug 2000 EP
1032150 Aug 2000 EP
1071296 Jan 2001 EP
1075118 Feb 2001 EP
1075123 Feb 2001 EP
1098446 May 2001 EP
1117204 Jul 2001 EP
1134951 Sep 2001 EP
1143635 Oct 2001 EP
1185125 Mar 2002 EP
1190526 Mar 2002 EP
1213943 Jun 2002 EP
1248188 Oct 2002 EP
1374477 Oct 2002 EP
2204940 Jul 2010 EP
2346512 Aug 2000 GB
1101042 Apr 1989 JP
02090840 Mar 1990 JP
03179841 May 1991 JP
05216411 Aug 1993 JP
06125554 May 1994 JP
7115414 May 1995 JP
7193569 Jul 1995 JP
7288798 Oct 1995 JP
9135478 May 1997 JP
9331314 Dec 1997 JP
10023529 Jan 1998 JP
10051380 Feb 1998 JP
10063598 Mar 1998 JP
10093547 Apr 1998 JP
10191459 Jul 1998 JP
10200536 Jul 1998 JP
10214233 Aug 1998 JP
10271041 Oct 1998 JP
10240826 Nov 1998 JP
10512428 Nov 1998 JP
11110401 Apr 1999 JP
11127468 May 1999 JP
11136669 May 1999 JP
11161167 Jun 1999 JP
11243569 Sep 1999 JP
11510668 Sep 1999 JP
11313059 Nov 1999 JP
11331070 Nov 1999 JP
11331150 Nov 1999 JP
11513853 Nov 1999 JP
11345179 Dec 1999 JP
11355460 Dec 1999 JP
11355858 Dec 1999 JP
2000040064 Feb 2000 JP
2000078555 Mar 2000 JP
2000115860 Apr 2000 JP
2000134193 May 2000 JP
2000137551 May 2000 JP
2000138632 May 2000 JP
2000165258 Jun 2000 JP
2000183968 Jun 2000 JP
2000196546 Jul 2000 JP
2000196673 Jul 2000 JP
2000224648 Aug 2000 JP
2000244603 Sep 2000 JP
2000253065 Sep 2000 JP
2000253459 Sep 2000 JP
2000261374 Sep 2000 JP
2000269959 Sep 2000 JP
2000511733 Sep 2000 JP
2000287192 Oct 2000 JP
2000295541 Oct 2000 JP
2000513519 Oct 2000 JP
2000324155 Nov 2000 JP
2000349755 Dec 2000 JP
2001007759 Jan 2001 JP
2001007800 Jan 2001 JP
2001016179 Jan 2001 JP
2001016253 Jan 2001 JP
2001500327 Jan 2001 JP
200136941 Feb 2001 JP
2001036466 Feb 2001 JP
2001045100 Feb 2001 JP
2001053675 Feb 2001 JP
2001077859 Mar 2001 JP
2001077859 Mar 2001 JP
2001119340 Apr 2001 JP
2001134193 May 2001 JP
2001136507 May 2001 JP
2001177513 Jun 2001 JP
2001177523 Jun 2001 JP
2001177564 Jun 2001 JP
2001510970 Aug 2001 JP
2001512842 Aug 2001 JP
2001268535 Sep 2001 JP
2001513587 Sep 2001 JP
2001333032 Nov 2001 JP
2001522164 Nov 2001 JP
2002026835 Jan 2002 JP
2002027417 Jan 2002 JP
2002502204 Jan 2002 JP
2002064785 Feb 2002 JP
2002505458 Feb 2002 JP
2002506296 Feb 2002 JP
2002084470 Mar 2002 JP
2002152194 May 2002 JP
2002514024 May 2002 JP
2002175505 Jun 2002 JP
2002521879 Jul 2002 JP
2002216040 Aug 2002 JP
2002217894 Aug 2002 JP
2002232418 Aug 2002 JP
2002232962 Aug 2002 JP
2002300152 Oct 2002 JP
2002319936 Oct 2002 JP
2002541685 Dec 2002 JP
2003503896 Jan 2003 JP
200352029 Feb 2003 JP
2003099327 Apr 2003 JP
2003115832 Apr 2003 JP
2003124927 Apr 2003 JP
2003521843 Jul 2003 JP
2003259284 Sep 2003 JP
2003297015 Oct 2003 JP
2003529963 Oct 2003 JP
2003339000 Nov 2003 JP
2004048718 Feb 2004 JP
200480663 Mar 2004 JP
2004507175 Mar 2004 JP
2004532554 Oct 2004 JP
2004533174 Oct 2004 JP
2004343764 Dec 2004 JP
2005509367 Apr 2005 JP
2005512471 Apr 2005 JP
20000062153 Oct 2000 KR
200130725 Apr 2001 KR
20010030696 Apr 2001 KR
2073913 Feb 1997 RU
2077113 Apr 1997 RU
2091983 Sep 1997 RU
2115249 Jul 1998 RU
2147792 Apr 2000 RU
2187205 Aug 2002 RU
353841 Mar 1999 TW
373372 Nov 1999 TW
388158 Apr 2000 TW
420910 Feb 2001 TW
448658 Aug 2001 TW
502190 Sep 2002 TW
508958 Nov 2002 TW
8301881 May 1983 WO
WO8607224 Dec 1986 WO
WO9611538 Apr 1996 WO
WO9715161 Apr 1997 WO
9716924 May 1997 WO
WO9716890 May 1997 WO
WO9717790 May 1997 WO
WO9747094 Dec 1997 WO
WO9748212 Dec 1997 WO
WO9810604 Mar 1998 WO
WO98025422 Jun 1998 WO
WO9857509 Dec 1998 WO
WO9904583 Jan 1999 WO
WO9922466 May 1999 WO
WO9922478 May 1999 WO
WO9930234 Jun 1999 WO
WO9939524 Aug 1999 WO
WO9944114 Sep 1999 WO
WO9949588 Sep 1999 WO
WO9949595 Sep 1999 WO
WO9959355 Nov 1999 WO
WO9962231 Dec 1999 WO
WO9966657 Dec 1999 WO
WO0002406 Jan 2000 WO
WO0004718 Jan 2000 WO
WO0008883 Feb 2000 WO
WO0013356 Mar 2000 WO
WO0033535 Jun 2000 WO
WO0036804 Jun 2000 WO
WO0041364 Jul 2000 WO
WO0048358 Aug 2000 WO
WO0051308 Aug 2000 WO
WO0052880 Sep 2000 WO
WO0056018 Sep 2000 WO
WO0057601 Sep 2000 WO
WO0062476 Oct 2000 WO
WO0062547 Oct 2000 WO
WO0072609 Nov 2000 WO
WO0074311 Dec 2000 WO
WO0074425 Dec 2000 WO
WO0076125 Dec 2000 WO
WO0076234 Dec 2000 WO
WO0078008 Dec 2000 WO
WO0079734 Dec 2000 WO
WO0101630 Jan 2001 WO
WO0110146 Feb 2001 WO
WO0113358 Feb 2001 WO
WO0117163 Mar 2001 WO
WO0119027 Mar 2001 WO
WO0120805 Mar 2001 WO
WO0145443 Jun 2001 WO
WO0150783 Jul 2001 WO
WO0156232 Aug 2001 WO
WO0208449 Jan 2002 WO
0215578 Feb 2002 WO
WO0247356 Jun 2002 WO
WO0247407 Jun 2002 WO
WO02054663 Jul 2002 WO
WO02061572 Aug 2002 WO
WO02080449 Oct 2002 WO
WO02080454 Oct 2002 WO
WO02096150 Nov 2002 WO
WO03001772 Mar 2003 WO
WO03032573 Apr 2003 WO
03043310 May 2003 WO
03051056 Jun 2003 WO
WO03051072 Jun 2003 WO
WO03063418 Jul 2003 WO
WO2004025895 Mar 2004 WO
WO2005008393 Jan 2005 WO
WO2009130589 Oct 2009 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (90)
Entry
3GPP TS 25.211 V4.2.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical Channels and Mapping of Transport Channels onto Physical Channels (FDD)(Release 4)(Sep. 2001).
3GPP TS 25.212 V4.2.0, 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Multiplexing and Channel Coding (FDD)(Release 4)(Sep. 2001).
3GPP TS 25.214 v4.1.0(Jun. 2001) Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Physical layer procedures (FDD), Release 4, ETSI TS 125 214 V4.1.0, Jun. 2001.
3GPP TS 25.214 V4.2.0 (Sep. 2001) 3rd Generation Partnership Project; Technical Specification Group Radio Access Network; Physical Layer Procedures (FDD)(Release 4).
3GPP2 C.S0002-0 Version 1.0 (Jul. 1999) 3rd Generation Partnership Project 2 “3GPP2” Physical Layer Standard for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum Systems.
Alfred J. Menezes, Paul C. van Oorschot and Scott A. Vanstone. Handbook of Applied Cryptography, CRC Press. (Oct. 1996): p. 364 (in particular, refer to section 9.6.3), http://www.cacr.math.uwaterloo.ca/hac/about/chap9.pdf.
Al-Tawil, “A New Authentication Protocol for Roaming Users in GSM”, Proceedings for IEEE International Symposium on Computers and Communication, Jul. 6, 1999, pp. 93-99.
Asaka et al., “Dynamic Multicast Routing Using Predetermined Path Search”. Technical Report of IEICE (The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers), SSE95-56 IN99-37 CS99-78, Sep. 27, 1999.
Baccelli, F. et al: “Self Organizing Hierarchical Multicast Trees and Their Optimization,” INFOCOM 1999. IEEE, 1081-1089 (Mar. 21, 1999).
Baugher et al: “The Secure Real Time Transport Protocol” Internet Engineering Task Force, AVT Working Froup, Internet-Draft, Jul. 2003, XP002320685.
Berkovits, S. “How to Broadcast a Secret” Advances in Cryptology, Eurocrypt, International Conference on the Theory and Application of Cryptographic Techniques, Springer-Verlag, Delaware, Apr. 11, 1991, pp. 535-541.
Bormann, C., et al. “Robust Header Compression (ROHC)” Internet Draft, Dec. 2000, pp. 1-122, XP002901751 (pp. 4-5).
Brown: “The Electronic Post It Note Model for Mobile Computing Applications,” Computing Lab, The University, Canterbury, Kent, The Institution of Electrical Engineers, IEEE, Savoy Place, London, WC2R OBL, UK, 1995.
Estrin, et al., “The Protocol Independent Multicast-Sparse Mode (PIM-SM),” RFC 2362, Jun. 1998.
ETSI TR 125 925 V3.3.0: “Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Radio Interface for Broadcast/Multicast Services (3GPP TR 25.925 version 3.3.0 Release 1999),” XP002230388, pp. 1-35, (Dec. 2000).
ETSI TS 125 213 v4.1.0; Universal Mobile Telecommunications System (UMTS); Spreading and modulation (FDD), 3G TS 25 213 version 4.1.0 Release 4 (Jun. 2001).
ETSI:“Universal Mobile Telecommunications Systems (UMTS); Multimedia Broadcast/Multicast Service (MBMS); Stage 1, 3GPP TS 22.146 version 5.2.0 Release 5”, ETSI TS 122.146 v5.2.0, pp. 1-15, Mar. 2002.
Farinacci, D., et al., “Generic Routing Encapsulation (GRE),” Network Working Group Request for Comments 2784, Mar. 1-8, 2000. URL:http://www.globecom.net/ieft/rfc/rfc2784.html (retrieved on Feb. 14, 2003).
FOLDOC, Spread-spectrum communications, definition, dated Aug. 8, 2001, from http://foldocorg/indexcgi?query=spread+spectrum.
“Functional Model of a Conditional Access System”, EBU Review—Technical European Broadcasting Union, Bussels, BE, No. 266; Dec. 21, 1995; pp. 64-77; XP000559450.
Gong, L. et al: “Trade-Offs in Routing Private Multicast Traffic,” Global Telecommunications Conference, 1995. IEEE, 2124-2128 (Nov. 13, 1995).
Handley, M. et al., “SDP: Session Description Protocol” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 2327, Category: Standards Track. ISI/LBNL, Apr. 1998, pp. 1-42.
Haverinen, et al., “EAP SIM Authentication” draft-haver inen-pppext-eap-sim-11 .txt, [online] <URL:http:|/www.watersprings.org|pub/id/draft-haverinen-pppext-eap-sim- 11 .txt> Jun. 2003, pp. 1-64.
IEEE. “IEEE STD. 802.11, Part 11; Wireless LAN Medium Access Control (MAC) and Physical Layer (PHY) Specifications” 1997, pp. 60-70.
International Search Report, PCT/US2002/032052—International Search Authority—European Patent Office, Sep. 10, 2003.
Jalali, A., et al. “Data Throughput of CDMA-HDR a High Efficiency-High Data Rate Personal Communication Wireless System,” IEEE VTC2000, QUALCOM inc., San Diego CA 2000 pp. 1854-1858.
JNSA, “Trend of the Latest Security Protocol IPsecH-with Demonstration Experiment Report for Interconnection,” Network Magazine, vol. 6, No. 6, Japan, Jun. 2001, vol. 6, pp. 86-93.
Jou, Y.: “Developments in Third Generation (3G) CDMA Technology” Spread Spectrum Techniques and Applications, 2000 IEEE Sixth International Symposium on Sep. 6-8, 2000, Piscataway, NJ, USA, IEEE vol. 1, Sep. 6, 2000, pp. 460-464.
Kalliokulju J.: “User Plane Architecture of 3rd Generation Mobile Telecommunication Network,” IEEE International Conference on Networks, ICON, Proceedings on Networks (ICON'99), Sep. 28, 1999-Oct. 1, 1999, pp. 270-278, XP010354980.
Keeler, Robert E., “Interoperability Considerations for Digital HDTV,” IEEE Transactions on Broadcasting, vol. 37, No. 4, Dec. 1991, pp. 128-130.
Lin, et al: “A Multicast Routing Protocol for Multihop Wireless Networks,” Dept. of Computer Science and Information Engineering, Chung Cheng University, Taiwan, Global Telecommunications Conference, Globecam 99, pp. 235-239, XP010373304.
Linuxguruz, : “Free On-Line Dictionary of Computing”, Internet Protocol, Dec. 2000.
Lou H., et al., “Progressive Video Streaming Over 2G and 3G Wireless Systems, XP010520891,” Proceedings of the 11th IEEE International Symposium on Personal Indoor and Mobile Radio Communications, 2000, 2 (18-21), 1550-1554.
MACQ. Benoit M. et al. “Cryptology for Digital TV Broadcasting”, 1995 IEEE, vol. 83, Issue 6, pp. 944-957.
Marchent, B.G., et al. “Intelligent Control of Mobile Multimedia Systems” Vehicular Technology Conference 1998. VTC 98, 48th IEEE Ottawa, Canada, May 18-21, 1998; New York, USA, May 18, 1998, pp. 2047-2051.
Meier J D et al: “Building Secure ASP.NET Applications: Authentication, Authorication, and Secure Communication: Cryptography and Certificates” Microsoft Patterns & Practices, Nov. 2002, pp. 1-5, XP002321827.
Menezes, A. et al.: “Handbook of Applied Cryptography” 1997, CRC Press LIC, USA XP002248262 pp. 497-500, 551-552.
Menezes, A. et al.: “Handbook of Applied Cryptography,” Chapter 13, pp. 543-590, CRC Press (1996).
Menezes et al. : “Key Layering and Cryptoperiods,” Passage, Handbook of Applied Cryptography, CRC Press Series on Discrete Mathematics and its Applications, Boca Raton, FL, CRC Press, US, 1997, pp. 551-553, 577-581.
Mooij, W.: “Advances in Conditional Access Technology”, IEEE, pp. 461-464 (Sep. 1997).
Moy, “Multicast Extensions to OSPF,” RFC 1584, Mar. 1994.
Okamoto, “Encryption Technology for Realizing A Bright Information Society 5: Management of Encryption Key Distribution”, Bit, Japan, Kyoritsu Shuppan Co., Ltd., Nov. 1, 1991, vol. 23, No. 12, pp. 51-59.
Osamu Takahashi “Prospect of Push type Information Delivering Service/Technology”, Translation of Cited Reference 4, pp. 1-19.
Pannetrat, et al, “Authenticating real time packet streams and multicasts”, 2002 IEEE. Computers and Communications, 2002. Proceedings. ISCC 2002. Seventh International Symposium on, pp. 490-495.
Paul K et al: “A Stability-Based Distributed Routing Mechanism to Support Unicast and Multicast Routing in Ad Hoc Wireless Network” Computer Communcations, Elsevier Science Publishers BV, Amsterdam, NL, vol. 24, No. 18, Dec. 1, 2001, p. 1828-1845, XP0043.
Pelletier, et al., “Robust Header Compression (ROHC): A Profile for TCP/IP (ROHC-TCP)”, Internet Draft, Feb. 21, 2005, pp. 1-2.
Schneier, B.: “Applied Cryptography, Conference Key Distribution and Secret Broadcasting” Second Edition, pp. 520, 523-524, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. XP002248263 (1996).
Schneier, B.: “Applied Cryptography,” Second Edition, pp. 170, 171, 173, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1996).
Schneier, B.: “Applied Cryptography,” Second Edition, pp. 182-184, John Wiley & Sons, Inc. (1996).
Shannon, C.E., “A Mathematical Theory of Communication,” The Bell System Technical Journal, vol. 27, pp. 379-423, 623-656, July, Oct. 1948.
Simpson, W., “PPP in HDLC-Like Framing,” Network Working Group, Request for Comments: 1662 (RFC 1662), Jul. 1994, pp. 1-34.
Stallings, W.: “Cryptography and network security” 1995, Prentice-Hall, Inc., XP002248261 pp. 402-406, 413-417, 421-424.
Stallings, W.: “Cryptography and network security: Principles and Practice” Second Edition, 1999, Prentice Hall, New Jersey, pp. 400-413.
Tadaumi, “IP Technology as Communciation Infra,” The Institute of Electronics Information and Communcaition Engineers, vol. 83, No. 4, Apr. 2000, pp. 286-294.
Tanenbaum, Andrew S.: Computer Networks, Third Edition; Pub. 1996; pp. 8, and 179-190.
Tanenbaum, Andrew S.: Computer Networks; Second Edition; Pub 1993, pp. 16, 199-203, XP2530414.
TIA/EIA/IS-856 Interim Standard cdma2000 High Rate Packet Data Air Interface Specification (Nov. 2000).
TIA/EIA/IS-95-A, Mobile Station-Base Station Compatibility Standard for Dual-Mode Wideband Spread Spectrum Cellular System (Revision of TIA/EIA/IS-95)(May 1995).
TIA/EIA/IS-95-B Mobile Station-Base Station Compatibility Standard for Dual-Mode Wideband Spread Spectrum Cellular System (IS-95 Standard), Feb. 3, 1999.
Toh C-K et al: “ABAM: On-Demand Associativity-Based Multicast Routing for Ad Hoc Mobile Networks,” Vehicular Technology Conference, 2000. IEE, 987-993 (2000).
Toshiaki Miyazaki “A Stream-data Multicast Protocol Using IP Unicast Address” Technical Report of IEICE, IN2001-9, May 11, 2001.
Waitzman, et al., “The Distance Vector Multicast Routing Protocol (DVMRP),” RFC 1075, Nov. 1, 1998.
Yamaguchi, S., “Realization of Multimedia Communications”, Unix Magazine, ASCII Corporation, Jun. 1, 1996, vol. 11, No. 6, pp. 45-53.
Yang et al: “An Efficient Multicast Delivery Scheme to Support Mobile IP,” Database and Expert Systems Applications,1999. IEEE, 638-88 (Sep. 1, 1999).
You Xiaohu, “R&D Progress on China's 3G Mobile Communications”, Telecom Science, vol. 2, 2001, pp. 11-17.
European Search Report—EP10004607, Search Authority—Munich Patent Office, Nov. 18, 2010.
Haverinen H: “EAP SIM Authentication”, 3GPP Draft; S3-010663—Draft-Haverinen-PPPPEXT-EAP-SIM-0 2, 3RD Generation Partnership-Project (3GPP), Mobile Competence Centre ; 650, Route Des Lucioles ; F-06921 Sophia-Antipolis Cedex ; France, vol. SA WG3, No. Sophia; Nov. 28, 2001, XP050271835, [retrieved on Nov. 28, 2001]. (22 pages).
Supplementary European Search Report—EP04777745, Search Authority—Berlin Patent Office, Dec. 14, 2010.
Taiwanese Search Report—093124861—TIPO—Jul. 12, 2010.
Brown, D., “Techniques for Privacy and Authentication in Personal Communication Systems,” IEEE Personal Communications, vol. 2, No. 4, pp. 6-10, Aug. 1995, doi: 10.1109/98.403452.
European Search Report—EP10005810, Search Authority—Munich Patent Office, Oct. 11, 2010.
Translation of Office Action in Japan Application 2004-531597 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 11/626,822, citing JP2002506296, JP2002026835, JP2002152194, JP2000287192, JP20017800, WO0062476, JP7115414, JP7288798, JP10214233, JP11510668, JP2000134193, JP2001134193, JP2001512842, JP2001513587, JP2002027417, JP2002521879, JP2002505458, JP2002232418, WO02061572 and JP2003529963 dated Nov. 24, 2011.
Translation of Office Action in Japan application 2006-518894 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 10/870,303, citing JP2002541685, WO0208449, WO2005008393, Dan—Brown—Techniques—pgs—6—10—year—1995 and Haverinen—EAP—SIM—year—2003 dated Mar. 22, 2011.
Translation of Office Action in Japanese Application 2002-577339 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 09/933,971 , citing JP11331070, JP2090840, JP2000244603 and JP2000115860 dated Oct. 19, 2010.
Translation of Office Action in Japanese Application 2008-184930 corresponding to U.S. Appl. No. 12/703,099, citing JP2001177564, JP10200536, T. Asaka et. al., T. Miyazaki et. al., WO0156232 and WO0150783 dated Feb. 8, 2011.
Bauer D., et al., “An error-control scheme for a multicast protocol based on round-trip time calculations”, Local Computer Networks, 1996., Proceedings 21st IEEE Conference on Minneapolis, MN, USA Oct. 13-16, 1996, Los Alamitos, CA, USA,IEEE Comput. SOC, US, Oct. 13, 1996, pp. 212-221, XP010200690, DOI: 10.1109/LCN. 1996.558149 ISBN: 978-0-8186-7617-8 * chapters 3 + 3.1 *.
European Search Report—EP2204939—Search Authority—Berlin—May 8, 2012.
“Feature Story I: Evolution of Cellular Phones,” ASCII, Dec. 1, 2000, vol. 24, No. 12, pp. 204.
Menezes Alfred J., et al.,“Handbook of Applied Cryptography,” 1997 CRC Press, pp. 169-190.
Mysore J. P., et al., Performance of transport protocols over a multicasting-based architecture for Internet host mobility, Communications, 1998. ICC 98. Conference Record. 1998 IEEE International Conference on Atlanta, GA, USA Jun. 7-11, 1998, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, US, vol. 3, Jun. 7, 1998, pp. 1817-1823, XP010284635, DOI : 10.1109/ICC. 1998.683142 ISBN: 978-0-7803-4788-5 * abstract * * chapter 2 *.
Ohnishi H., et al., “Proposed Scheme for Route Optimization on the Mobile IP Network,” Technical Report of the Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers, SSE99-123 PS99-47, Dec. 17, 1999 .
Taiwan Search Report—TW093120386—TIPO—Feb. 8, 2012.
Yajnik M., et al., “Packet loss correlation in the MBone multicast network”, Global Telecommunications Conference, 1996. Globecom '96. Communications: The Key to Global Prosperity London, UK Nov. 18-22, 1996, New York, NY, USA, IEEE, US, Nov. 18, 1996, pp. 94-99, XP010220159, DOI: 10.1109/GLOCOM. 1996.586133 ISBN: 978-0-7803-3336-9 * chapter 3.1 *.
3GPP2 C.R1001-A, “Administration of Parameter Value Assignments for cdma2000 Spread Spectrum Standards Release C” Jul. 14, 2000, Version 2.0.
Chen T., et al.,“cdma2000 Broadcast Services Stage 2: System Design”,C10-20010820-008,3GPP2,Aug. 20, 2001.
QUALCOMM Europe: “MBMS Security Framework”, 3GPP TSG SA WG3 Security—S3 #29 S3-030356, Jul. 2003, MBMS Security and 3GPP-3GPP2 joint meeting.
Romkey J., “A Nonstandard for Transmission of IP Datagrams Over Serial Lines: SLIP”, rfc1055, IETF, Jun. 1988, URL, http://www. ietf.org/rfc/rfc1055.txt.
Sinnarajah R., “Signaling Support for Broadcast Service”, 3GPP2 TSG-C Contribution, 2002, C20-20020107-022, URL http://ftp.3gpp2.org /TSGC/Working/2002/TSG-C-0201/TSG-C-0201-Vancouver/WG2/C20-20020107-020 (Signaling-Support-for-Broadcast-Service).doc.
Haverinen, H., “GSM SIM Authentication and Key Generation for Mobile IP”; draft-haverinen-mobileip-gsmsim-01.txt; Internet Engineering Task Force, IETF, CH; Nov. 2000; XP015014135.
Momona, M., et al., “Technologies and Standardization Activities in Cable TV Access Networks,” IEICE Technical Report, Japan. The Institute of Electronics, Information and Communication Engineers (IEICE), Feb. 15, 1999. vol. 98, No. 589: pp. 57-64.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20100272124 A1 Oct 2010 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12683256 Jan 2010 US
Child 12818946 US
Parent 09976591 Oct 2001 US
Child 12683256 US