1. Technical Field
The invention relates to the scheduling of meetings. More particularly, the invention relates to a time request queue for scheduling a meeting with a hard-to-schedule person.
2. Description of the Prior Art
There are people in every organization with whom it is very difficult to schedule time. Typically, these people have administrative assistants that manage their time. Though group-scheduling software exists today, booking a meeting with these hard-to-schedule people typically requires contacting the administrative assistant by some alternate mechanism, such as telephone or email, and then requesting the meeting to be scheduled. This is not a big problem in isolation. But as many such meeting requests pile up, considerable time is spent by the administrative assistant in managing the requests and allotting time for each request. Should the scheduled time need to change, as it often does, a lot of time is spent trying to communicate the change of plans to those affected.
Currently, in group scheduling software a meeting organizer fills out a meeting request by proposing a date and time for the event to a list of attendees who, in turn, accept or decline the request. In all commercial group scheduling software today, the organizer is the only person who can set any detail of the meeting, i.e. the start time, the duration, the meeting title, the descriptive text, etc.
It would be advantageous to provide a group scheduling solution that offers an organized and formalized solution to the above described time management problem, in which the desired meeting includes one person who is difficult to schedule.
The presently preferred embodiment of the invention provides a group scheduling solution that offers an organized and formalized solution to the time management problem above mentioned, in which the desired meeting includes one person who is difficult to schedule. In the inventive approach, a scheduling system is provided in which a hard-to-schedule attendee takes over responsibility for setting the start time of an event.
In the invention, a workflow is provided as follows:
Note: The hard-to-schedule person can also decline the meeting entirely.
The presently preferred embodiment of the invention replaces state of the art group scheduling software, in which a meeting organizer fills out a meeting request by proposing a date and time for the event to a list of attendees who, in turn, accept or decline the request, with a new approach in which the hard-to-schedule attendee takes over responsibility for setting the start time of the event.
The preferred workflow is as follows:
The hard-to-schedule person can also decline the meeting entirely.
Step 1
Bill wants to set up a meeting with a couple of people on his team and with Joe, a hard-to-schedule vice-president. Bill goes into the calendar/scheduling program and creates the special time request. It is created very much like any other meeting, except that a specific start date/time is not set. Bill adds himself, his team, and Joe as attendees of the meeting. Bill indicates that the meeting will take one hour. Bill also marks Joe as a special attendee who can set the meeting time.
Step 2
After Bill creates the time request, it shows up on Joe's calendar. Time requests are collected and held until the attendee who can set the meeting time does so.
On the right side 12 of the screen is a list of the time requests that have not yet been assigned a specific time. The list shows the length of time requested, the requester, and the title of the meeting. Bill's meeting is highlighted by clicking it. The meeting request could be dragged and dropped onto the left side of the screen to assign it to a particular time or it could be double-clicked to bring up a more detailed dialog box in which the time can be set. Once the time request has been assigned a timeslot, it moves out of the time requests list and into the schedule.
Step 3
Joe schedules the request for 11:30 on Wednesday, October 31. Once this is done, Bill is alerted that his time request has been scheduled. The meeting request now shows up in all the attendees' schedules at the appointed time.
Many variants of the invention are contemplated. For example, it is often the case that an administrative assistant handles the scheduling requests and manages the calendars of others. The time request queue can be managed by an administrative assistant. Another embodiment involves varying the specific details that the hard-to-schedule attendee can set. For instance, it may be that the in addition to the start time, the location for the meeting is also set by the hard-to-schedule attendee.
There are also other usage scenarios. For example, a person who wants to take his car in for a checkup. Typically, there are certain preferences that the repair shop has, such as the shop's hours of operation and/or workload, subject to some of the preferences of the person who is arranging to take in his car, such as the time of day of day of week. The invention is applicable to the scheduling of an appointment with the repair shop, or any other service. Thus, the person who desires an appointment for service need only submit a request to the time request queue, and an appointment is scheduled based upon the schedule of the service, or alternatively based upon the preferences of the customer. This could include such things as setting an appointment to get a hair cut, where the appointment must be Tuesday nights between certain times.
The invention seeks to satisfy the customer preferences and the service's schedule, relative to these criteria. Thus, the hard to schedule individual, for example a doctor, can set a time and/or place, but subject to various requirements of the requestor. In such case, the needs of both parties may not overlap and the meeting may not take place. In such case, the requestor may provide alternatives or may rank his preferences to help accommodate the needs of the difficult to schedule person. Further, the hard to schedule person may have some flexibility in his schedule and could provide the requester with one or more alternatives, such as different times, days, and/or locations. The invention also supports a collaborative agenda, where the hard to schedule person may receive a proposed agenda with the request, and in setting the meeting time and/or place, may include a revised agenda with the meeting notice sent to each attendee.
Although the invention is described herein with reference to the preferred embodiment, one skilled in the art will readily appreciate that other applications may be substituted for those set forth herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the invention should only be limited by the Claims included below.
The present application is a divisional of and claims the benefit of priority of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/627,902, filed on Nov. 30, 2009, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,912,745 which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 10/155,625, filed on May 23, 2002, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,865,387.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4807154 | Scully et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4807155 | Cree et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4817018 | Cree et al. | Mar 1989 | A |
4819191 | Scully et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4831552 | Scully et al. | May 1989 | A |
4866611 | Cree et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
4977520 | McGaughey, III et al. | Dec 1990 | A |
5023851 | Murray et al. | Jun 1991 | A |
5124912 | Hotaling et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5129057 | Strope et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5261045 | Scully et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5457476 | Jenson | Oct 1995 | A |
5748907 | Crane | May 1998 | A |
5948040 | DeLorme et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5960406 | Rasansky et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6018343 | Wang et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6035278 | Mansour | Mar 2000 | A |
6047260 | Levinson | Apr 2000 | A |
6092067 | Girling et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6111572 | Blair et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6216110 | Silverberg | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6266814 | Lemmons et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6275810 | Hetherington et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6278456 | Wang et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6345260 | Cummings et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6594637 | Furukawa et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
6654457 | Beddus et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6687678 | Yorimatsu et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6826551 | Clary et al. | Nov 2004 | B1 |
7082402 | Conmy et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7108173 | Wang et al. | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7174303 | Glazer et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7177905 | Slutsman et al. | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7188073 | Tam | Mar 2007 | B1 |
7283970 | Cragun et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7587327 | Jacobs et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
20010027481 | Whyel | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010054072 | Discolo et al. | Dec 2001 | A1 |
20020035493 | Mozayeny et al. | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20030036941 | Leska et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030195774 | Abbo | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20050027580 | Crici et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20080183563 | Raffel et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0 323 703 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0 276 424 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0 276 425 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0 276 426 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0 276 428 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0 276 429 | Nov 1993 | EP |
0 326 778 | Sep 1996 | EP |
1 122 672 | Aug 2001 | EP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110167356 A1 | Jul 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 12627902 | Nov 2009 | US |
Child | 13051207 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10155625 | May 2002 | US |
Child | 12627902 | US |