This patent relates generally to the fields of medical information and patient management, and, more particularly, to methods and systems for providing medical devices to patients.
The fields of telemedicine and home healthcare have experienced strong growth in recent years. In a telemedicine system, a patient is geographically removed from the presence of a doctor or other healthcare provider. For example, the patient could be at home instead of on site at a healthcare facility. Telemedical devices enable the healthcare provider to monitor the health status of a patient and potentially diagnose and treat some medical problems without the need for the patient to travel to the healthcare facility. The use of telemedical systems has the potential to reduce the cost of healthcare, and to improve the quality of healthcare through increased patient monitoring.
Various known telemedicine systems provide a device to a patient that enables the patient to transmit medical data to a doctor or healthcare provider. Some devices are configured to record biosignals, such as heart rate, blood pressure, and respiration rates, and transmit data of the recorded biosignals to a database for later review. Other telemedicine systems enable remote visits between a patient and a healthcare provider and also provide real time medical data to the provider during the visits.
While telemedicine systems have numerous potential advantages, such systems can also present challenges to the healthcare system. Telemedicine systems can increase healthcare costs in at least two different ways. First, the purchase and maintenance costs of the telemedical devices and associated communication infrastructure to support telemedicine contribute to the overall cost of telemedicine systems. Secondly, the amount of time that medical professionals spend analyzing medical data from telemedicine systems contributes to the cost of the telemedicine system and may take away resources from other medical services. Depending upon the medical condition of a patient, a telemedicine system may provide limited additional medical benefit in comparison to traditional treatments. However, when used appropriately, a telemedicine system can reduce the total cost of healthcare and improve the quality of healthcare for many patients. Existing telemedicine systems are, however, not well equipped to identify the patients that are most suitable to receive telemedicine treatment. Thus, improvements to medical systems that help identify patients for telemedical devices would be beneficial.
In one embodiment, a method for selecting recipients for a medical device has been developed. The method includes providing first medical data associated with one patient from a database stored in a memory to a controller communicatively coupled to the memory, identifying with the controller a probability that a medical device provides a medical benefit to the one patient that exceeds a cost associated with providing the medical device to the one patient with reference to the first medical data and a probabilistic model, the probabilistic model having a plurality of model parameters stored in the memory and provided to the controller, each model parameter corresponding to one type of datum in the first medical data, and generating with a user interface device that is communicatively coupled to the controller an output indicating the one patient is eligible to receive the medical device, the output being generated in response to the identified probability exceeding a first predetermined probability threshold value stored in the memory.
In another embodiment, a system for controlling distribution of medical devices to patients has been developed. The system includes a user interface device, a memory, and a controller operatively connected to the user interface device and the memory. The memory is configured to store a database containing medical data corresponding to a plurality of patients, a plurality model parameters corresponding to a probabilistic model, each model parameter corresponding to one type of datum in the plurality of medical data, and a plurality of stored program instructions. The controller is configured to execute the stored program instructions to retrieve first medical data corresponding to one patient from the database, identify a probability that a medical device provides a medical benefit to the one patient that exceeds a cost associated with providing the medical device to the one patient with reference to the first medical data and the probabilistic model having the plurality of model parameters, and display an output via the user interface device to indicate provision of the medical device to the one patient in response to the identified probability exceeding a first predetermined threshold.
For the purposes of promoting an understanding of the principles of the embodiments described herein, reference is now be made to the drawings and descriptions in the following written specification. No limitation to the scope of the subject matter is intended by the references. This patent also includes any alterations and modifications to the illustrated embodiments and includes further applications of the principles of the described embodiments as would normally occur to one skilled in the art to which this document pertains.
The term “telemedicine” as used herein refers to a form of medicine in which a patient and healthcare provider electronically communicate with one other to enable the patient, who is not located in the healthcare provider's facility, to receive medical treatment from the healthcare provider. The term “telemedical device” as used herein refers to any device that is configured to electronically transmit and/or receive data pertaining to a telemedicine treatment received by a patient from a healthcare provider practicing telemedicine on the patient. A telemedical device is one example of a more general category of medical devices, which include any device having diagnostic and/or therapeutic uses, such as respirators, pace makers, blood sugar testing devices, inhalators, heart monitors, and the like. While the specific embodiments described herein are directed to telemedical devices, the systems and methods described herein are also suitable for use with a wide variety of medical devices.
The term “probabilistic model” as used herein refers to a mathematical model that generates a probability value for an event when provided with input data. For example, a probabilistic model generates a probability value when provided with medical data corresponding to the patient. The term “medical data” as used herein refers to any data relevant to medical treatment of a patient. The term “medical record” refers to a set of medical data corresponding to a patient. The probability value generated by a probabilistic model described in this document indicates the likelihood that the selected patient will experience a benefit that outweighs a corresponding cost if provided with a telemedical device. Some embodiments of probabilistic models discussed in this document include parameters that are associated with medical data for the patient. As described below, the values of the parameters provided to the probabilistic model are generated using collected medical data for one or more patients.
In the system 100, the controller 104 is an electronic processing device such as a microcontroller, application specific integrated circuit (ASIC), field programmable gate array (FPGA), microprocessor including microprocessors from the x86 and ARM families, or any electronic device that is configured with programmed instructions and electronic components to perform the functions of the system 100 described herein. In an exemplary embodiment, the system 100 is a workstation with the controller 104 being a microprocessor implementing a version of the x86 or ARM microarchitecture that is configured to run a general purpose operating system. The memory 108 includes one or more data storage devices including volatile data storage devices, such as random access memory (RAM), and non-volatile data storage devices, which include solid state storage devices, magnetic disk drives, optical disk drives, and the like. The controller 104 is communicatively coupled to the memory 108 to enable the controller 104 to obtain data that are stored in the memory 108 and to store data in the memory 108. The controller 104 executes programmed instructions that are obtained from the stored program data 120 in the memory 108 to perform the processes described herein.
The memory 108 holds the patient profile database 112. The patient profile database stores medical data associated with each patient that is monitored by the system 100. In various embodiments, the patient profile database is implemented as a relational database, a key-value store, one or more files holding comma separated value (CSV) data, an object-oriented database, a hierarchical database, or any data storage scheme that enables the system 100 to store and retrieve medical data for one or more patients.
In addition to medical data pertaining to each patient, the patient profile database 112 includes data associated with the costs and benefits of providing a telemedical device to each patient. Table 500 stores a record of the total cost 532 to provide the telemedical device to each patient, a measurement of the benefit 536 that the telemedical device provides to the patient, and an overall indicator of net benefit 540 provided by the telemedical device. The term “net benefit” as used herein refers a difference between the measured benefit 536 and the total cost 532. A positive net benefit occurs when the measured benefits exceed the total costs, and a negative net benefit occurs when the total costs exceed the measured benefits. The total cost 532 includes both the initial cost of the telemedical device, as well as the ongoing costs of monitoring medical data received from the telemedical device and providing telemedicine to the patient. The measured benefit 536 can include various factors such as savings realized from reducing the number of hospital visits or medical procedures that a patient undergoes because the patient receives telemedicine.
While the table 500 depicts the costs and benefits in monetary terms, alternative embodiments measure costs and benefits using other indicators. One alternative embodiment measures the cost of the telemedicine treatment in an expected benefit of a different treatment regime compared to the actual measured benefit of the telemedicine treatment. For example, a patient with high cholesterol could be placed on a regimen of statin drugs with occasional doctor visits to produce an expected reduction in the cholesterol level of the patient. If a telemedicine treatment with more frequent interaction with the doctor results in a larger reduction in the cholesterol level, then the benefit of the telemedicine treatment outweighs the “cost” measured for the traditional treatment option.
Referring again to
In the embodiment of
The system 100 is configured to store medical data for each patient in the patient profile database 112.
Referring again to
Process 200 continues by generating a probabilistic model with a plurality of model parameters retrieved from memory (block 212). In the system 100, the controller 104 retrieves the model parameters 116 from the memory 108, and stored program instructions 120 include instructions that enable the controller 104 to generate the probabilistic model. In one embodiment, the controller 104 generates a probabilistic model that is a logistic regression model having the following formula:
where C is a classification associated with the patient given a plurality of f features, also referred to as a feature vector f. Each feature in the feature vector f corresponds to one medical datum associated with one patient. The probabilistic model also includes a plurality of model parameters arranged in a model parameter vector θ. Each of the model parameters in the model parameter vector θ represents a relative numeric weighting assigned to a corresponding one of the features in the feature vector f. The classification C corresponds to a decision that the patient will receive a benefit from the telemedical device that is greater than a cost associated with the telemedical device. A second classification P(
In the system 100, each feature in the feature vector f corresponds to a single medical datum for the patient such as each of the fields 508-528 in
Using the logistic regression with medical data features f for the example patient 1234 in
The value corresponds to an 82% chance that patient 1234 receives a net benefit from the telemedical device. The logistic regression predicts an 18% chance that the patient does not receive a net benefit from the telemedical device.
Process 200 continues by generating an optional confidence value corresponding to the generated probability (block 220). In the system 100, the processor 104 is configured to generate a confidence value. The confidence value represents an estimate of the level of certainty of the probability value. In one embodiment, the confidence is related to the value of the identified probability using an entropy measurement according to the following equation: H(C|f)=−(P(C|f, θ) log(P(C|f, θ))+P(
Another method for identifying the confidence value includes generation of a confidence value that corresponds to a sum of multiple disagreement values of model parameters used to identify the probability in the logistic regression. First, a plurality of parameter vectors θN, are generated by N different classifier functions, also referred to as a committee of classifiers. The N classifier functions generate the θN parameter vectors from a predetermined set of training data D. The training data D include one or more sets of feature vectors that include the same medical data in the feature vector f corresponding to a single patient who is undergoing evaluation for the telemedical device. In one embodiment, the training data D include medical data and predetermined results for a group of patients who have already received telemedical treatment. The following confidence equation identifies a confidence value with reference to differences in the regression values generated by the individual parameter vectors θN conditioned on the identified medical data feature vector f of a single patient:
Confidence(C|f)=∫θ1∫θ2|P(C|f,θ1)−P(C|f,θ2)|P(θ1|D)P(θ2|D)dθ1dθ2.
In the confidence value equation, θ1 and θ2 represent pairs of model parameter vectors generated by the N classifiers without regard to the order of the classifiers. For an example with three classifiers A, B, and C, the pairs of parameter vectors are (θA, θB), (θA, θC), and (θB, θC). The values for P(C|f,θ1) and P(C|f,θ2) represent the regression value for a single patient using two different sets of classifier model parameters θ1 and θ2.
The difference between the values of P(C|f,θ1) and P(C|f,θ2) are multiplied by two scaling factors P(θ1|D) and P(θ2|D) for each pair of parameter vectors θ1 and θ2. As used herein, the term “scaling factor” refers to the conditional probability of generating the parameter vectors θ1 and θ2 given the training data D for each of the N classifier functions. The scaling factors P(θ1|D) and P(θ2|D) identify the significance assigned to differences between the regressions for the parameter vectors θ1 and θ2 in the in the confidence equation.
The difference between values generated by the classifiers using the different model parameter vectors with a single set of medical data f for one patient corresponds to a disagreement value. The confidence value equation generates a sum of all the disagreement values-between each model parameter vector given the medical data f for one patient. For example, if model parameter vector θ1=[1, 2.4, 3.3, −5.1] and model parameter vector θ2=[1, 2, 4, 3.3, −1.8], the disagreement in the regressions P(C|f,θ1) and P(C|f,θ2) for given medical data f corresponds to the difference in the final parameter in θ1 and θ2. The magnitude of the confidence value indicates a level of disagreement between predictions generated by different model parameters. Smaller disagreement values indicate that the probability values generated by different model parameters and features produce similar probabilities.
Process 200 continues to identify the eligibility of the patient to receive a telemedical device using the probability value and optional confidence value. Process 200 compares the probability value from the logistic regression to a predetermined threshold value (block 224). In the system 100, a predetermined threshold value 124 is stored in the memory 108 and the controller 104 compares the generated probability value to the predetermined threshold. The threshold value is selected based on various criteria, such as the overall number of devices that are available for use by patients and the level of importance of the telemedicine compared to other medical treatment options, for example. Other or additional criteria are used in other embodiments to select predetermined threshold values used by the probabilistic model.
If process 200 generates a confidence value, then the confidence value is compared to a predetermined confidence threshold value as well (block 228). In the embodiments described above, a low numeric value indicates a higher confidence level, so the identified confidence level passes when the confidence value is less than the predetermined confidence threshold value. Other measures of confidence can be configured to exceed a predetermined threshold value as well. In the system 100, the predetermined confidence threshold value is stored in the eligibility threshold data 124 in the memory 108.
When a patient has a sufficiently high predicted probability of receiving a net benefit from the telemedical device, and an optional confidence level of the prediction meets the predetermined threshold, process 200 concludes by generating a signal via the user interface to indicate that the patient is eligible to receive a telemedical device (block 232). In some embodiments, the output is a graphical symbol with accompanying text that informs the healthcare provider to begin treatment with the telemedical device. In the system 100, the user interface 128 is configured to display a message indicating that the patient is eligible to receive a telemedical device. In the event that a patient is not eligible to receive the telemedical device, the user interface outputs a second message indicating that the patient is not eligible to receive the telemedical device (block 236). When a patient is not eligible to receive a telemedical device, the system 100 is configured to display another course of treatment that is more suited to the needs of the patient based on the patient data.
In an alternative embodiment, the system 100 is further configured to transfer program and configuration data to the telemedical device when a user is eligible to receive the device. In
In an optional embodiment, process 200 exports the results of the patient evaluation for use with medical outreach (block 240). For example, selected portions of the medical data for patients and the evaluations of process 200 can be sent via a data network, such as the Internet, to a database maintained by one or more healthcare providers. In the example of
Process 300 begins by generating medical profile data for one patient in the group of patients who are applying to receive a telemedical device (block 304). Process 300 continues by retrieving the medical data for the one patient from the profile database 112 (block 308), generating the probabilistic model using the model parameters 116 stored in the memory 108 (block 312), and identifying a probability that the one patient will receive a net benefit from treatment with the telemedical device (block 316). In the system 100, the controller 104 is configured to perform process blocks 304-316 in substantially the same manner as process blocks 204-216, respectively, in process 200.
Process 300 repeats blocks 304-316 for each patient in the group of patients who have applied to receive the telemedical device (block 320). Once a probability is identified for each of the patients, the N patients having the highest probabilities of a net benefit are each selected to receive one of N telemedical devices (block 328). The number N can be selected based on the number of available telemedical devices or on the available patient capacity of a healthcare provider. A tie occurs (block 332) when multiple patients have the same or a similar net benefit probability. Process 300 breaks a tie by identifying the confidence value of each patient, and selecting the patient with the highest confidence, or the lowest numeric entropy or disagreement value identified in process 200, to receive the telemedical device.
As described above, processes 200 and 300 use a logistic regression probabilistic model with model parameter vector θ to identify recipients of a telemedical device.
Once the distribution for the selected datum is determined, process 400 generates a parameter estimator to estimate parameter values of a probabilistic model, such as the logistic regression parameters, given the observed benefits of the device as depicted in field 540 of
Process 400 generates numeric model parameters for some numeric data types that have a linear relationship to the probability of a net benefit. In
For some types of patient data the estimator considers patients with similar data values as a group to generate parameters. In one configuration, all patients in an age group of 40-50 years can be treated as having a single age for purposes of the estimating the model parameters. Additionally, a piecewise parameter generation can be useful for some datum types. One piecewise parameter is generated based on age ranges of patients. For patients below the age of 50 a positive parameter indicates that the telemedical device has a constant positive result for all patients in the age range. The parameter value is still positive, but with a smaller value, for patients between the ages of 50 and 75. The parameter is negative for patients over the age of 75 indicating that advanced age tends to reduce the likelihood that the telemedical device will benefit such patients.
Some model parameters have a non-numeric value including the sex parameter 512. Other non-numeric medical data include names of medications prescribed to the patient and surgical procedures performed on the patient. Process 400 generates numeric model parameters for the non-numeric medical data using the parameter estimator.
As depicted in
Referring again to
It will be appreciated that variants of the above-described and other features and functions, or alternatives thereof, may be desirably combined into many other different systems, applications or methods. Various presently unforeseen or unanticipated alternatives, modifications, variations or improvements may be subsequently made by those skilled in the art that are also intended to be encompassed by the following claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
6235474 | Feinberg | May 2001 | B1 |
6438407 | Ousdigian et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6443890 | Schulze et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6764447 | Iliff | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6803195 | Avivi et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
7368233 | Shuber et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7468032 | Stahmann et al. | Dec 2008 | B2 |
7611870 | Feinberg | Nov 2009 | B2 |
7653556 | Rovinelli et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7685005 | Riff et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7811757 | Shuber | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7818185 | Bjorner et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7917438 | Kenedy et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
7953614 | Reicher et al. | May 2011 | B1 |
7959568 | Stahmann et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8548937 | Saigal et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20020010597 | Mayer et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020169636 | Eggers et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020184050 | Papageorge | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20020194032 | Mankopf et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009354 | Arbogast et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030065241 | Hohnloser | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20040045560 | Kent et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040078232 | Troiani | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040103001 | Mazar et al. | May 2004 | A1 |
20040267570 | Becker | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20060111941 | Blom | May 2006 | A1 |
20060122864 | Gottesman et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060200010 | Rosales et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060206011 | Higgins et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060218007 | Bjorner et al. | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060235280 | Vonk et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070063850 | Devaul et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070136115 | Senturk Doganaksoy et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20080133275 | Haug et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080262873 | Bayne et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090105550 | Rothman et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090125325 | Martinez et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090187082 | Cuddihy et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090192826 | deLusignan et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090326981 | Karkanias et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100017231 | Galbraith et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100063840 | Hoyme et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063930 | Kenedy et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100065840 | Yamazaki et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100131434 | Magent et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100138199 | Soto et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145953 | Charles et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100204920 | Dranitsaris et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100235178 | Firminger et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110071363 | Montijo et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110092825 | Gopinathan et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120016690 | Ramarajan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
Entry |
---|
International Search Report and Written Opinion in corresponding PCT application (i.e., PCT/US2012/064755), mailed Jun. 10, 2013 (9 pages). |
Lin et al, “Rationing of Resources: Ethical Issues in Disasters and Epidemic Situations,” Prehospital and Disaster Medicine, May-Jun. 2009, pp. 215-221, USA (7 pages). |
Mitchell, Tom M., “Generative and Discriminative Classifiers: Naive Bayes and Logistic Regression”, Draft article for textbook “Machine Learning” T.M. Mitchell, McGraw Hill, 2010 (17 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130124224 A1 | May 2013 | US |