The present subject matter relates to techniques and equipment to stack mailpieces for sweeping. The mailpieces are manufactured on a mail processing machine such as, but not limited to an inserter or wrapper.
Shingling conveyors are used to stack finished envelopes from an inserter or wrapper. They are the most common mechanism to collect finished envelopes produced by an inserter in today's mailing environment. With this type of conveyor, an operator will “sweep the belt”, which essentially amounts to an operator using both his/her hands to pull as many envelopes/mailpieces together as possible, and still be able to lift them into an awaiting mail tray which is typically on a table or cart near the end of the conveyor. Because the mailpieces are manually lifted off the conveyor and carried to the tray, the size of the bundle of mailpieces is limited by the strength and dexterity of the operator. Failure of the operator to grip the selected bundle of mailpieces firmly enough can easily result in loosing control of the center of the bundle when lifting and moving the bundle to a mail tray which is positioned to the side or behind the operator. It should be readily apparent that tumbling a bundle of mailpieces to the floor during the sweeping operation causes a significant delay in operations due to clean up.
The sweeping process is repeated until the tray is full. Tray break marks or an offset of a single mailpiece alerts the operator where the end of the bundle of mailpieces occurs and a new tray must be started. This process is time consuming, risks missing a tray break and requires a significant amount of lifting. In addition, significant time can be saved by eliminating the step where an operator has to search for the tray break mark. If the operator fails to sweep the stacker conveyor at the speed at which the inserter produces mailpieces, the inserter must be stopped until there is free space on the stacker conveyor. Stoppage effects production throughput. Operator fatigue from lifting, turning and placing a mail bundle in the correct mail tray increases the probability of tray sweeping errors, of stoppage for operator rest or additional staff to allow for rest without inserter stoppage.
Hence a need exists for an on-edge conveyor where common components have been ergonomically positioned to permit the filling of a mail tray in a matter of seconds (e.g. less than 5 seconds) with minimal lifting of weight, i.e. a quantity of envelopes that has already been offset can be pulled over the rolled/rounded edge of the conveyor into an awaiting mail tray supported on a roller conveyor. The operator would then push the full tray to the side, load another empty tray, and repeat the process.
In one aspect of the present application, a stacker system for stacking mailpieces received from an output section of mail processing equipment is provided. The stacker system comprises an in-feed transport section for receiving the mailpieces from the output section of the mail processing equipment. A stacker module is configured to receive the plurality of mailpieces, by their leading edges, in an on-edge orientation and stack the mailpieces to form a mailpiece tray bundle. A conveyor module includes at least one conveyor drive belt and a wear plate having a rounded edge. The wear plate is configured to receive the mailpiece tray bundle driven by the conveyor drive belt. The trailing edges of the mailpieces of the mailpiece tray bundle are justified at the rounded edge of the wear plate. A roller conveyor is positioned below the edge of wear plate and parallel with the conveyor module. The roller conveyor is configured to receive the mailpiece tray bundle over the rounded edge of the wear plate and into a mail tray positioned on the roller conveyor. The rounded edge of the wear plate overhangs the roller conveyor such that the mail tray bundle can be slidably moved across an upper surface of the rounded edge without damaging the mailpieces.
In another aspect, a method for stacking mailpieces is provided. The method comprises the steps inputting, at an in-feed transport section of a stacker system, the mailpieces from an output section of mail processing equipment. The plurality of mailpieces are received in an on-edge orientation in a stacker module. The mailpieces are stacked in the stacker module to form a mailpiece tray bundle. The trailing edges of the mailpieces of the mailpiece tray bundle are justified at a rounded edge of a wear plate of a conveyor module. The mailpiece tray bundle is conveyed along conveyor belts of the conveyor module. The mailpiece tray bundle is swept over an upper surface of the rounded edge of the conveyor module and into a mail tray positioned on a roller conveyor below the rounded edge of the wear plate. The rounded edge of the wear plate overhangs the roller conveyor and the mailpiece tray bundle is slidably moved across the upper surface of the rounded edge without damaging the mailpiece tray bundle and without having to lift up the mailpiece tray bundle.
The advantages and novel features are set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part will become apparent to those skilled in the art upon examination of the following and the accompanying drawings or may be learned by production or operation of the examples. The advantages of the present teachings may be realized and attained by practice or use of the methodologies, instrumentalities and combinations described herein.
The drawing figures depict one or more implementations in accord with the present teachings, by way of example only, not by way of limitation. In the figures, like reference numerals refer to the same or similar elements.
a is an exemplary diagram of an inserter system on which the on-edge stacker/conveyor system is attached.
b is an exemplary diagram of a wrapper system on which the on-edge conveyor system is attached.
a is an exemplary expanded view illustration of the input roller assembly of the stacker module.
a, 3b and 3c are expanded view illustrations of the on-edge stacker conveyor control assembly; the tray break offset assembly and the tail roller assembly respectively.
In the following detailed description, numerous specific details are set forth by way of examples in order to provide a thorough understanding of the relevant teachings. However, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present teachings may be practiced without such details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and circuitry have been described at a relatively high-level, without detail, in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring aspects of the present teachings.
The teachings herein alleviate one or more of the above noted problems by the unique positioning of key common conveyor components in such a way to maximize the potential throughput of the machine by greatly reducing a common bottle neck—the time it takes to offload “sweep” the conveyor stacker, while at the same time maximizing the ergonomic benefit to the operator by eliminating the need to lift mail. Some important features include: 1) a method for adapting to various upstream devices, e.g. inserter, with different output heights and either standing up or laying flat, 2) a method for standing mail on-edge, with either clockwise (CW) or counter clockwise (CCW) rotation from a flat position depending on the orientation of the envelope and the orientation of the stacker conveyor—attached on the right or left side of the on edge stacker system, 3) a method for offsetting the on-edge material 90° onto a conveyor, 4) a conveyor that is sufficiently long so as to not adversely affect throughput, 5) an attached roller transport to support mail trays between the operator and the conveyor, 6) a smooth rounded edge on the stacker conveyor on which mailpieces can rest while being transitioned to the mail tray and 7) clearly defined tray breaks where the entire bundle of mailpieces to be swept into a tray are offset on the stacker conveyor for easy identification and gripping.
In one example, the features that enable an operator to fill 5 mail trays, each containing approximately 400 mailpieces and weighing 15 lbs each in 13 seconds, thus keeping up with inserters that can process 10,000 to 30,000 mailpieces per hour all without having to “lift” the mail off the conveyor—are listed below and illustrated in detail in the figures.
The mail on the conveyor is biased to the trailing edge, i.e. the edge of the conveyor closest to the operator. This is the case regardless of the size of the envelope. A backstop that adjusts for different envelope lengths is used to maintain consistent edge registration. When the mail is offset for tray breaks, it will be approximately one inch back from that trailing edge.
The geometry of the conveyor edge closest to the operator will be smooth and rounded, either fixed or rotating, and will have minimal drag or friction on the envelopes as they are pulled over the edge into the mail tray.
All of the mail destined for a mail tray is standing upright in an offset block. This orientation prevents the operator from having to sweep shingled mailpieces into a vertical position before practically loading a mail tray.
The mail tray will be positioned slightly under this conveyor edge to minimize the risk of the mail catching on the side of the tray as it is pulled over the edge. Since typically mail trays are bowed out in the middle, this added feature should minimize the risk of tumbling the mail during the loading process.
Lifting the mail bundle is eliminated since the mail is being pulled over the conveyor edge down into the tray.
As a result of these features, the operator is not lifting the typical 15 lbs per mail tray, but rather, sliding the mailpiece bundle into the tray. For an inserter running 30,000 mailpieces per hour, this is equivalent to eliminating the lifting of 1125 lb/hr.
Reference now is made in detail to the examples illustrated in the accompanying drawings and discussed below.
a illustrates the component parts of an exemplary inserter system 100 to which the on-edge conveyor system 10 is attached and through which documents are tracked in order for the control computer 50 to control the tray group offset subassembly (
The data associated with the control code may specify parameters that affect the performance of the input channel 130. These parameters include, but are not limited to, document page count, paper thickness, fold type, inserts required and delivery point ZIP code. Once the control code reader 133 has read the delivery point or obtained the delivery point from a file referenced using a read unique reference and passed the delivery point data to the control computer 50, the document may be tracked through the accumulator 134, folder 135, collator 136, base track 105 and the envelope stuffing engine 140 where the finished envelope is handed off to the on-edge conveyor 10. Tracking of the finished mailpiece continues in the on-edge conveyor 10 as the mailpiece is transported 92 through the in-feed transport module 13, the twist module 20 and arrives at the stacker module 25 where the off-set assemble controls whether the mailpiece is added to the tray bundle current tray bundle or a new tray bundle is started by actuating or releasing the movable stop 72. Those skilled in the art of tracking a document or envelope through an inserter or wrapper will employ a variety of photocells and encoders to measure speed. In addition, computer algorithms in the control processor 50 will utilize the photocell data and encoder data to perform the required tracking.
b illustrates the component parts of an exemplary wrapper system 200 to which the on-edge conveyor system 10 is attached and through which documents are tracked in order for the control computer 50 to control the tray group offset subassembly (
Returning attention to
Mailpiece tray group 35 is compressed and ready to load into an empty mail tray 32. The stacker paddle 36 is rotated to the up position so that it does not interfere with the sweeping operation. The stacker paddle 36 is in the down position between sweeping operations, to prevent the last mailpieces in the adjacent mailpiece tray group 45, from falling over on the stacker conveyor 30. The stacker paddle 36 has a tab on the bottom that rests in the grove of the toothed conveyor drive belts 54. This configuration ensures that the stacker paddle 36 is tight against the mailpiece tray bundle 45 but is able to move as the drive belts 54 move the mailpiece tray bundles 48 and 45 down the stacker conveyor. The control of the conveyor drive belts is illustrated in
The roller conveyor 29 runs the entire length of the stacker conveyor 30 to support both full 32 and empty 34 mail trays. The roller conveyor is composed of a side rail 57 to support the rollers 52. A second side rail to support the other end of the roller can be used. The two side rail roller conveyors are commercially available. However, this configuration is not satisfactory for the on-edge stacker system 10 since the second side rail would prevent the positioning of trays against the side plate 55 and underneath the lip of the wear plate edge 59. If the mail tray is not under the edge 59 and against the side plate 55, the mailpiece tray group 35 would have to be lifted over the second side rail, thus defeating the design requirement that lifting motion of the mailpiece tray group 35 is replaced with a sliding motion by the operator 38. The tray group bundle is always supported on the bottom by either the wear plate 56 or the rounded wear plate edge during the sweeping operation. The solution is to integrate the bearing and support for the far end 53 of each roller 52 directly into the stacker conveyor 30 side plate 55. A movable stop 33 is located at the end of the roller conveyor to prevent mail trays from sliding off the conveyor onto the floor. A powered roller conveyor may be added at the end of the roller conveyor 29 to take away full trays to a staging area or automated tray sleeve mechanism thus eliminating the need for the operator to lift and place full mail trays 32 on a cart or pallet.
Alternate configurations of the on-edge stacker system 10 may be utilized to handle different system geometry requirements. For example, but not limited to, the stacker conveyor 30 can be designed for sweeping from the opposite side from where the operator 38 is shown or the stacker conveyor 30 may be configured on the right side of the stacker module 25 versus the left side as illustrated. The twister module 20 can stand mail on-edge, with either clockwise (CW) or counter clockwise (CCW) rotation from a flat position depending on the orientation of the envelope and the orientation of the stacker conveyor module 30—attached on the right or left side of the on edge stacker system 10. The direction of mailpiece rotation, CW or CCW, are design features that are implemented in the design layout and are not a parameter that can be changed job to job. Different envelope orientations can be accommodated such as, but not limited to, the address facing down when it enters the twist module 20 versus facing up as illustrated in
Turning now to
Reference is now made to
The adjustment capability in the mailpiece tray group offset assembly 27 is critical to the correct stacking of the normal mailpiece tray group 45. Prior art stackers are designed to justify the leading edge of the mailpiece against the far wall of the stacker conveyor 30 to avoid setup steps. However, this approach fails to provide an ergonomically favorable design for the operator. Testing has shown that the best position for the normal mailpiece tray group 45 is to justify the mailpiece trailing edge on the wear plate edge 59 by moving the tray group offset assembly 27. Any time saved with the prior art design, which does not require setup for different mailpiece lengths, is in significant compared to the time saved during the sweeping process when the ergonomically friendly design disclosed herein is implemented.
c is an alternative view of the tail roller assembly 28. The protective roller shield 80 is a metal shield to prevent the trailing edge of the mailpiece from being damaged by the belt that drives the tail roller 82. The final mailpiece tracking photocell 84 before the mailpiece is stacked is shown. The photocell is used to confirm that the mailpiece arrived at the expected time based on mailpiece tracking by the control computer 50. If the next expected mailpiece arrives late or not at all then a jam condition or mailpiece fly out has occurred.
Attention is now directed to
Testing has revealed that several required design features associated with the wear plate edge 59 were clear improvements over existing system designs.
As shown by the above discussion, functions relating pertain to the operation of an inserting system wherein on-edge stacker system 10 control is implemented in the hardware and controlled by one or more computers operating as the inserter control computer 50 which are connected to the inserting system and possibly to a data center processor/server for data communication with other factory the processing resources as shown in
As known in the data processing and communications arts, a general-purpose computer typically comprises a central processor or other processing device, an internal communication bus, various types of memory or storage media (RAM, ROM, EEPROM, cache memory, disk drives etc.) for code and data storage, and one or more network interface cards or ports for communication purposes. The software functionalities involve programming, including executable code as well as associated stored data. The software code is executable by the general-purpose computer that functions as the control processor 170 and/or the associated terminal device. In operation, the code is stored within the general-purpose computer platform. At other times, however, the software may be stored at other locations and/or transported for loading into the appropriate general-purpose computer system. Execution of such code by a processor of the computer platform enables the platform to implement the methodology for tracking of mail items through a postal authority network with reference to a specific mail target, in essentially the manner performed in the implementations discussed and illustrated herein.
For example, inserter control computer 50 may be a PC based implementation of a central control processing system like that of
In operation, the main memory stores at least portions of instructions for execution by the CPU and data for processing in accord with the executed instructions, for example, as uploaded from mass storage. The mass storage may include one or more magnetic disk or tape drives or optical disk drives, for storing data and instructions for use by CPU. For example, at least one mass storage system in the form of a disk drive or tape drive, stores the operating system and various application software. The mass storage within the computer system may also include one or more drives for various portable media, such as a floppy disk, a compact disc read only memory (CD-ROM), or an integrated circuit non-volatile memory adapter (i.e. PC-MCIA adapter) to input and output data and code to and from the computer system.
The system also includes one or more input/output interfaces for communications, shown by way of example as an interface for data communications with one or more other processing systems. Although not shown, one or more such interfaces may enable communications via a network, e.g., to enable sending and receiving instructions electronically. The physical communication links may be optical, wired, or wireless.
The computer system may further include appropriate input/output ports for interconnection with a display and a keyboard serving as the respective user interface for the processor/controller. For example, a printer control computer in a document factory may include a graphics subsystem to drive the output display. The output display, for example, may include a cathode ray tube (CRT) display, or a liquid crystal display (LCD) or other type of display device. The input control devices for such an implementation of the system would include the keyboard for inputting alphanumeric and other key information. The input control devices for the system may further include a cursor control device (not shown), such as a mouse, a touchpad, a trackball, stylus, or cursor direction keys. The links of the peripherals to the system may be wired connections or use wireless communications.
The computer system runs a variety of applications programs and stores data, enabling one or more interactions via the user interface provided, and/or over a network to implement the desired processing, in this case, including those for tracking of mail items through a postal authority network with reference to a specific mail target, as discussed above.
The components contained in the computer system are those typically found in general purpose computer systems. Although summarized in the discussion above mainly as a PC type implementation, those skilled in the art will recognize that the class of applicable computer systems also encompasses systems used as host computers, servers, workstations, network terminals, and the like. In fact, these components are intended to represent a broad category of such computer components that are well known in the art. The present examples are not limited to any one network or computing infrastructure model—i.e., peer-to-peer, client server, distributed, etc.
Hence aspects of the techniques discussed herein encompass hardware and programmed equipment for controlling the relevant document processing as well as software programming, for controlling the relevant functions. A software or program product, which may be referred to as a “program article of manufacture” may take the form of code or executable instructions for causing a computer or other programmable equipment to perform the relevant data processing steps, where the code or instructions are carried by or otherwise embodied in a medium readable by a computer or other machine. Instructions or code for implementing such operations may be in the form of computer instruction in any form (e.g., source code, object code, interpreted code, etc.) stored in or carried by any readable medium.
Such a program article or product therefore takes the form of executable code and/or associated data that is carried on or embodied in a type of machine readable medium. “Storage” type media include any or all of the memory of the computers, processors or the like, or associated modules thereof, such as various semiconductor memories, tape drives, disk drives and the like, which may provide non-transitory storage at any time for the software programming. All or portions of the software may at times be communicated through the Internet or various other telecommunication networks. Such communications, for example, may enable loading of the relevant software from one computer or processor into another, for example, from a management server or host computer into the image processor and comparator. Thus, another type of media that may bear the software elements includes optical, electrical and electromagnetic waves, such as used across physical interfaces between local devices, through wired and optical landline networks and over various air-links. The physical elements that carry such waves, such as wired or wireless links, optical links or the like, also may be considered as media bearing the software. As used herein, unless restricted to non-transitory, tangible “storage” media, terms such as computer or machine “readable medium” refer to any medium that participates in providing instructions to a processor for execution.
Hence, a machine readable medium may take many forms, including but not limited to, a tangible storage medium, a carrier wave medium or physical transmission medium. Non-volatile storage media include, for example, optical or magnetic disks, such as any of the storage devices in any computer(s) or the like. Volatile storage media include dynamic memory, such as main memory of such a computer platform. Tangible transmission media include coaxial cables; copper wire and fiber optics, including the wires that comprise a bus within a computer system. Carrier-wave transmission media can take the form of electric or electromagnetic signals, or acoustic or light waves such as those generated during radio frequency (RF) and infrared (IR) data communications. Common forms of computer-readable media therefore include for example: a floppy disk, a flexible disk, hard disk, magnetic tape, any other magnetic medium, a CD-ROM, DVD or DVD-ROM, any other optical medium, punch cards paper tape, any other physical storage medium with patterns of holes, a RAM, a PROM and EPROM, a FLASH-EPROM, any other memory chip or cartridge, a carrier wave transporting data or instructions, cables or links transporting such a carrier wave, or any other medium from which a computer can read programming code and/or data. Many of these forms of computer readable media may be involved in carrying one or more sequences of one or more instructions to a processor for execution.
In the detailed description above, numerous specific details are set forth by way of examples in order to provide a thorough understanding of the relevant teachings. However, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that the present teachings may be practiced without such details. In other instances, well known methods, procedures, components, and software have been described at a relatively high-level, without detail, in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring aspects of the present teachings.
This application claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/641,716 entitled “METHOD AND SYSTEM FOR SEMI-AUTOMATED TRAY LOADING DEVICE” filed on May 2, 2012, the disclosure of which is entirely incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4518160 | Lambrechts et al. | May 1985 | A |
4643626 | Noguchi et al. | Feb 1987 | A |
4903955 | Manzke | Feb 1990 | A |
5125214 | Orsinger et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5253859 | Ricciardi | Oct 1993 | A |
5271710 | Decharran et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5485989 | McCay et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5503388 | Guenther et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
6398204 | Keane et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
7089717 | Guttinger et al. | Aug 2006 | B2 |
20020017447 | Emigh et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20040080096 | Holbrook | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040113355 | Antonelli et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20100106290 | Isles et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100198391 | Schafer | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110192892 | Van Gorp et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1790591 | May 2007 | EP |
Entry |
---|
European Search Report issued in European Application No. 13166231.4-1705 dated Apr. 17, 2014. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130294879 A1 | Nov 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61641716 | May 2012 | US |