1. Field of the Invention
This invention relates generally to the field of motors, and more particularly, to circuits and methods for determining the position of a brushless DC motor's rotor.
2. Description of the Related Art
Brushless DC motors generally comprise a stator and a permanent magnet rotor. The stator includes at least one coil; an excitation voltage is periodically applied across the coils, and the resulting electromagnetic field causes the rotor to rotate with respect to the stator.
To ensure that the application of the excitation voltage is correctly timed, it is necessary to know the position of the rotor with respect to the stator coils. This is conventionally accomplished with the use of one or more Hall effect sensors, with the stator coils activated by drive electronics that are cued by signals received from the sensors. One motor system of this type is illustrated in
However, the approach depicted in
One alternative to the use of Hall sensors is employed in some multiple-phase DC brushless motors. Here, the electro-motive force (EMF) generated in a passive coil while another coil is energized is measured and used to determine the position of the rotor.
A method and system for providing sensorless brushless DC motor control using predictive switch timing are presented which overcome the problems noted above, providing accurate rotor position information without the need for Hall sensors or a passive coil.
The present method determines the position of a brushless DC motor's permanent magnet rotor by applying an excitation voltage having a first polarity across at least one stator coil for a predetermined ON-time period, deactivating the excitation voltage, monitoring the voltage (VEMF) across the coil generated by the electro-motive force (EMF) induced by the motor's rotor when the excitation voltage is deactivated, and detecting when VEMF changes polarity. The polarity of VEMF changes when the rotor has moved by a known distance which depends on the number of rotor poles. The stator coil is connected in a full-bridge configuration. This arrangement enables the excitation voltage to be applied and the VEMF polarity to be monitored across the same coil.
To keep the rotor spinning, after detecting that VEMF has changed polarity, an excitation voltage having a polarity opposite that of the first polarity is applied across the coil for a predetermined ON-time period, at which point it is deactivated and VEMF again monitored to detect when it changes polarity. This sequence of events is continuously repeated to maintain the rotation of the rotor.
The motor is initially set into motion using a start-up routine, which also serves to determine the predetermined ON-time period used during steady-state operation. The start-up routine comprises exciting the coil for a fixed ON time with an excitation voltage having a first polarity, which is then deactivated and VEMF monitored. If VEMF has not changed polarity, the coil is excited again with a voltage of the same polarity, which is again deactivated and VEMF monitored. This is repeated until VEMF changes polarity. Then an excitation voltage having a second polarity opposite the first is applied across the coil for a fixed ON time, after which it is deactivated and VEMF monitored. If VEMF has not changed polarity, the coil is excited again with a voltage of the second polarity, deactivated, and VEMF monitored; this is repeated until VEMF changes polarity. The start-up routine is terminated when the excitation voltage need only be applied for one fixed ON time before VEMF changes polarity.
The present control method and system are suitably used to control DC brushless motors. One possible application for such a motor is to drive a fan blade for a fan designed to cool an integrated circuit.
These and other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with reference to the following drawings, description, and claims.
a is a schematic and corresponding plan view of a rotor and stator illustrating the operation of one step of a start-up routine per the present invention.
b is a schematic and corresponding plan view of a rotor and stator illustrating the operation of another step of a start-up routine per the present invention.
c is a schematic and corresponding plan view of a rotor and stator illustrating the operation of another step of a start-up routine per the present invention.
d is a schematic and corresponding plan view of a rotor and stator illustrating the operation of another step of a start-up routine per the present invention.
e is a schematic illustrating the operation of another step of a start-up routine per the present invention.
f is a schematic and corresponding plan view of a rotor and stator illustrating the operation of another step of a start-up routine per the present invention.
g is a schematic illustrating the operation of another step of a start-up routine per the present invention.
h is a schematic and corresponding plan view of a rotor and stator illustrating the operation of another step of a start-up routine per the present invention.
a is a timing diagram illustrating the operation of a portion of a start-up routine per the present invention.
b is a timing diagram illustrating the operation of another portion of a start-up routine per the present invention.
c is a timing diagram illustrating the operation of another portion of a start-up routine per the present invention.
The present invention is a method and means for determining the position of a brushless DC motor's permanent magnet rotor which is induced to rotate with a stator that includes at least one coil. The method requires that at least one stator coil be excited with a voltage having a first polarity for a given period of time, and then deactivated. The rotor continues to spin because of inertia, and also generates a voltage (VEMF) due to EMF in the deactivated coils. VEMF is monitored, and when it changes polarity, the rotor has moved by a known distance with respect to its position at the time of its previous change of polarity. The known distance depends on the number (n) of rotor poles, and is given generally by (360/n)°. Thus, for a typical four pole rotor, the known distance is 90°, for an eight pole rotor, the known distance is 45°, etc. At this point, the at least one stator coil is excited with a voltage of a second polarity opposite the first polarity for a given period of time. The coil is again deactivated and VEMF again monitored to detect when it changes polarity. In this way, the position of the rotor can be tracked. The stator coil is connected in a full-bridge configuration. This arrangement enables the excitation voltage to be applied and VEMF to be monitored across the same coil, thereby obviating the need to monitor EMF across a passive coil as in prior art designs.
This process is illustrated in
When a change of VEMF polarity is detected, an excitation voltage (36) having a second polarity (here, negative) is applied across the coil. After a predetermined “ON” time, the coil is deactivated and VEMF monitored. A change in the polarity of VEMF indicates that the rotor has moved another 90°.
To maintain the rotation of the rotor, the sequence of events described above is continuously repeated. By detecting the change in the polarity of VEMF, the position of the rotor becomes known, and the timing of the excitation voltage pulses can be properly controlled—without the use of costly Hall sensors as are found in prior art methods.
A basic system for implementing the control method described above is shown in
A first comparator C1 has its inputs connected to node 44 and ground, and a second comparator C2 has its inputs connected to node 46 and ground. The outputs of the comparators are provided to a digital control block 50, which provides control signals 52, 54, 56, 58 to operate switches S1, S2, S3 and S4, respectively.
Digital control block is arranged to operate the switches as needed to apply a positive excitation voltage (by closing S1 and S4) or a negative excitation voltage (by closing S2 and S3). When so arranged, the system of
Switches S1-S4 are preferably implemented with transistors. This is illustrated in
At start-up, the position, direction of rotation and the time taken by the rotor to move 90° (assuming a four pole rotor) is unknown. The present method preferably includes a start-up routine which is used to accelerate the rotor from rest, and to start the rotor spinning in a desired direction. One possible start-up routine is illustrated in
The start-up routine proceeds as follows:
The fixed ON time is selected so that, when the rotor first begins to turn, more than one excitation pulse is required before VEMF changes polarity. However, as the rotor starts to accelerate, fewer excitation pulses will be required to achieve a change in VEMF polarity. The start-up routine continues as described above until the rotor has picked up enough speed so that only one excitation pulse is needed to effect a change in VEMF polarity. Then, the ON and OFF times of the single excitation pulse are increased or decreased as desired to achieve a desired steady-state motor speed.
Steps 3, 4 and 5 are illustrated with the timing diagram shown in
Step 6 is illustrated with the timing diagram shown in
In
Once steady-state operation is achieved, there are many ways in which a constant rotor speed could be maintained. One possible technique proceeds as follows:
Note that the methods and/or systems of the present invention could be implemented in many different ways. It is only essential that at least one stator coil be connected in a full-bridge configuration, that an excitation voltage be applied across the coil for a predetermined ON-time period and then deactivated, and that the voltage (VEMF) across the coil generated by the EMF induced the coil by the rotor be monitored while the excitation voltage is deactivated to detect when it changes polarity.
In a two-phase motor, it is very difficult to determine the direction of the rotor; hence the physical shape of the stator is preferably changed to have the preferred direction of rotation. One possible stator-rotor design is shown in
A digital control block suitable for realizing the motor control and start-up method described herein could be implemented in many possible ways. One approach is to implement the digital block as a state machine.
The present method has been described as it might be used with multiple stator coils connected in parallel, as would commonly be found on a 2-phase motor. However, the invention could also used with a single coil, with the excitation voltage applied and VEMF measured across the same coil. In this case, no “spare” or second coil is needed. The single coil would lie along one axis of the stator, with a first segment on one side of the stator hub and a second segment on the opposite side of the hub. The two segments would be connected in parallel. Assuming that the coil is initially aligned with two of the rotor's N poles, when an excitation voltage is applied across the coil, it generates an N-N field, forcing the rotor to rotate until the coil is aligned with two of the rotor's S poles, at which point the EMF voltage changes polarity. Applying an excitation voltage of the opposite polarity causes the rotor to move until the coil is again aligned with two of the rotor's N poles. For a four pole rotor, each rotor movement is 90°. If the rotor had, for example, eight poles (with N and S poles alternating around the rotor), the rotor would move 45° each time the excitation voltage polarity was reversed.
The present control method could be used with a variety of DC brushless motor types, which could in turn be used in a wide variety of applications. One possible application is that of a cooling fan designed for mounting on the surface of an integrated circuit.
The embodiments of the invention described herein are exemplary and numerous modifications, variations and rearrangements can be readily envisioned to achieve substantially equivalent results, all of which are intended to be embraced within the spirit and scope of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
5859520 | Bourgeois et al. | Jan 1999 | A |
6949900 | Berringer | Sep 2005 | B1 |
20030231875 | Masino | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20050225272 | Wu et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080101776 A1 | May 2008 | US |