The disclosure relates to methods and systems for shockwave attenuation, and more particularly to methods and systems for attenuating shockwaves by rapidly heating air to interpose an intermediate medium between the shockwave and a protected region.
Explosive devices are being used increasingly in asymmetric warfare to cause damage and destruction to equipment and loss of life. The majority of the damage caused by explosive devices results from shrapnel and shockwaves. Shrapnel is material, such as metal fragments, that is propelled rapidly away from the blast zone and may damage stationary structures, vehicles, or other targets. Damage from shrapnel may be prevented by, for example, physical barriers. Shockwaves are traveling discontinuities in pressure, temperature, density, and other physical qualities through a medium, such as the ambient atmosphere. Shockwave damage is more difficult to prevent because shockwaves can traverse an intermediate medium, including physical barriers.
Damage from shockwaves may be lessened or prevented by interposing an attenuating material between the shockwave source and the object to be protected. This attenuating material typically may be designed or selected to absorb the energy from the shockwave by utilizing a porous material that distorts as the energy of the shockwave is absorbed.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,394,786 to Gettle et al. describes a shockwave attenuation device that utilizes an absorbing medium. That assembly includes porous screens that form an enclosure filled with a pressure wave attenuating medium. This attenuating medium may be an aqueous foam, gas emulsion, gel, or granular or other solid particles. However, as shown and described in the drawings of that patent, the shockwave attenuating assembly must be positioned before the explosion occurs and surround the area to be protected. For example, the assembly may be positioned on the side of a vehicle to prevent damage to the vehicle or passengers within.
A similar shockwave attenuation device is described in U.S. Patent Publication No. 2007-0006723 to Waddell, Jr. et al. That device includes a number of cells filled with an attenuating material, such as aqueous foams. However, like the device described in Gettle et al., the pressure-attenuating material and device must be positioned on a structure, surface, or person desired to be protected by the system before the explosion occurs.
One feature common among prior art shockwave attenuation systems is that they require an intermediate medium or structure that acts to attenuate the force of the shockwave by absorbing the energy of the shockwave. Although only a portion of the shockwave may pass through the medium, the energy of the shockwave is nevertheless significantly reduced by the intermediate medium. However, because these systems are structural, they must be fixed in place before a shockwave is created. Further, these shockwave attenuation systems may not protect an entire vehicle or person. For example, attenuating panels are not transparent and therefore cannot be placed over windows or used as facemasks in helmets. They also may be bulky and heavy, and therefore negatively impact the performance of a vehicle on which they are mounted.
Such prior art shockwave attenuation systems may not be effective to protect highly mobile land assets for which an incoming threat may be in the form of a ballistic shell, rocket, IED, or landmine, or waterborne assets for which an incoming threat may be in the form of a torpedo, ballistic shell, bomb or a naval mine. Therefore, a need exists for a shockwave attenuation device that is capable of dynamically interposing a medium between an explosion source and a protected asset. There is also a need for an intermediate medium that effectively attenuates the energy from a shockwave and that allows for protection of a protected asset in a marine environment.
Presented is a system and method for attenuating a shockwave propagating in a first medium by detecting a shockwave-producing event, determining a direction of the shockwave relative to a protected asset, and interposing a second, transient medium, different from the first medium, between the shockwave and the protected asset such that a shockwave produced by the event contacts the second medium and is attenuated in energy thereby prior to reaching the protected asset. The second medium may be formed by rapidly heating a region of the first medium so that the second medium differs from the first medium in at least one of temperature, density and composition.
In one embodiment, a system for attenuating a shockwave propagating in a first medium may include a sensor for detecting a source of the shockwave and generating a detection signal, an arc generator in communication with the sensor and configured to receive the detection signal therefrom, and in response thereto create an electromagnetic arc to heat a selected region of the first fluid medium rapidly to create the second, transient medium, different from the first medium, interposed between the shockwave and the protected region such that the shockwave contacts the second, transient medium. The arc generator may be configured to heat the selected region by generating an electromagnetic arc, such as an electric arc or a laser or microwave arc, between the protected region and the incoming shockwave. In one embodiment, the arc generator may include a power supply for generating the arc and may provide a conducting path.
In embodiments, the arc generator may be configured to generate a focused microwave beam or a focused laser beam. In each case, the beam may rapidly heat the fluid medium in the selected region to create the second medium. In one embodiment, in which the fluid medium is atmospheric air, the focused beam rapidly heats the air in the selected region and changes its temperature, density and composition, the latter the result of the creation of free electrons.
In other embodiments, the arc generator may be adapted to develop and drive a large electric current through the fluid medium rapidly. In the embodiment in which the medium is atmospheric air, the second medium may differ from ambient air in temperature, density and composition. With these embodiments, the arc generator may be adapted to create a conducting path for the electric current. Accordingly, the arc generator may be configured to generate one or more of a laser-induced plasma channel (LIPC) from converging laser beams, ionizing tracer pellets fired along converging paths, and projectiles trailing fine electrical wires fired along converging paths. In each of these embodiments, an electric arc may be generated to travel along a conducting path created by dielectric breakdown of ionized ambient air at the selected region.
In still other embodiments, the arc generator may include a sacrificial conductor that may not rely on current travel along a path of ionized air. Rather, the arc generator may include a power supply that applies current to a conductor in the form of one or more strips or wires of conductive material. The high current flowing through the conductor from the power supply may vaporize the conductor, forming a conductive channel of vapor that may rapidly heat and ionize the air in the selected region to create a rapidly expanding second medium. An advantage of this embodiment is that the sacrificial conductor may be attached directly to the protected asset, such as a vehicle.
Such embodiments as described above may reduce the energy density of the shockwave by creating a second medium in the path of the advancing shockwave that reflects, refracts, absorbs and deflects at least a portion of the shockwave. This may result from creating a second medium that differs from the ambient medium (e.g., atmospheric air) in density, temperature and/or composition. Such differences may change the index of refraction of the wave front as it contacts the second medium, causing at least some of the shockwave to be reflected from the surface of the second medium, to diverge as the shockwave travels through the medium, and to be reflected and diverge further as the shockwave contacts the rearward boundary of the second medium. The second medium, some embodiments, acts to absorb the energy of the shockwave as the medium may be increased in temperature.
In yet other embodiments, the arc generator create the second medium by magnetic induction. The arc generator may be adapted to create channels or ionized air. When contacted by an advancing shockwave, the conducting channel may be deformed as ionized air is pushed inward. This movement does mechanical work, which removes energy from the shockwave, making it weaker. In one aspect, the channels may not be rigid, and may be pushed by the shockwave against the ambient air that the channels are displacing, which may transfer energy from the shockwave to kinetic energy of displaced air. In another aspect, parts of the conductive channels are not rigid, but the channels of ionized air pushed ahead of the magnetic flux are disrupted and broken until they form new channels through the air that heat the air. At least a portion of the shockwave energy may be transformed to ionization energy of air ions and into pressure-volume-temperature energy of expanded hot air.
In still another aspect, the conductive channels of magnetic flux are rigid may not be deformed by contact with the advancing shockwave. Instead, the flux may be compressed by contact with the shockwave, which may increase the electric current in the conductive channels. This increased current results from energy lost by the shockwave. The arc generator may be configured such that the excess current may bypass the power supply and be shunted to heat a resistive load, or charge a capacitor where it may be used later to power the arc generator.
With such embodiments, the advancing shockwave is diminished in force as the energy of the shockwave is converted either into mechanical energy, as when it deforms magnetic induction channels, or into electrical energy, as when it interacts with rigid magnetic flux channels. It is within the scope of this disclosure to provide a system and method in which combinations of the foregoing embodiments are deployed to defend a protected asset, or in which an embodiment is deployed multiple times against an incoming threat.
The features, functions, and advantages that have been discussed can be achieved independently in various embodiments of the present invention or may be combined in yet other embodiments further details of which can be seen with reference to the following description, drawings and claims.
The disclosed shockwave attenuation method and system may utilize a second, transient fluid medium that may be dynamically deployed in a first fluid medium between an explosion and a protected asset within a protected region. When contacted by an advancing shockwave produced by the explosion traveling through the first fluid medium, the second fluid medium may attenuate the energy from the shockwave through several vectors, rather than simply by absorbing the energy of the shockwave. While the following discussion describes various embodiments of the disclosed system and method as operating in a first fluid medium of atmospheric air, it is to be understood that the first fluid medium may be water, such that the disclosed system and method may be deployed in a marine environment.
As shown in
Referring to
In some embodiments, once the sensor 12 has detected an explosion 22, the sensor may be configured to estimate one or more of the magnitude, distance, and azimuthal position of the explosion and provide the estimates to the computer 14 or to the arc generator 16. In some embodiments, the computer 14 may measure the signature of the explosion 22 and compare it with stored known explosion signatures of a plurality of different known explosive devices. The computer 14 may then determine a probability that the explosion is from one of the known explosive devices. The computer 14 may then calculate an estimated probability distribution function (p.d.f.) of explosion magnitudes and locations relative to the protected asset 18 or protected region 20 based on at least one of stored data about the type of explosive device, location of the explosion, and the shape, relative orientation and relative motion of the protected asset, and make a determination to counter the explosion 22, including determining when and where to activate the arc generator 16, or not counter the explosion, based on one of stored data, models of vulnerability of the protected asset to shockwaves, and data from at least one of data and models of performance of the arc generator 16 with respect to attenuating shockwaves from at least one of an estimated explosion magnitude and location. Such calculations and estimates may prevent the deployment of the arc generator 16 in the event that the explosion 22 is too far away or too weak to generate a shockwave 24 that damages the protected region 20 significantly.
In another embodiment, the sensor 12 may be configured to detect an incoming threat 28 containing an explosive device or devices, such as a ballistic shell, bomb, torpedo, depth charge, naval mine or bomb-laden surface vessel. In such an embodiment, the sensor 12 may be configured to use radar, visible or infrared light, passive or active acoustic sensors, or other threat-detection method known to those skilled in the art, as well as trajectory tracking and prediction methods known to those skilled in the art.
In yet another embodiment, the sensor 12 may be configured to detect both the incoming threat 28 and the explosion 22 from the threat. In one embodiment, two systems 10 may be deployed on a protected asset 18 in which one system is configured to detect an incoming threat 28 and the other system is configured to detect an explosion 22. In yet another variation of such an embodiment, the sensor 12 may be in the form of two discrete sensors: one configured to detect an incoming threat 28, and the other configured to detect an explosion 22 from that incoming threat.
In some embodiments, the computer 14 may receive measurements from the sensor 12, estimate where and when an incoming threat 28 will detonate, or has already detonated, and directs the system 10 to deploy. When used with a sensor 12 that may detect an explosion that already has occurred, the computer 14 may be configured to receive information from the sensor pertaining to one or more of the direction, location, time, distance and magnitude of the explosion 22, the computer determines when and where to activate the arc generator 16.
In an embodiment wherein the sensor 12 is configured to detect an incoming threat 28 before explosion 22 has occurred, the computer 14 may be configured to compare the signature of the incoming threat 28 with stored known signatures of various threats (e.g., particular missiles). The computer 14 then estimates how probable each type of threat is, and, based on the stored data about the type of warhead for each threat, the measured motion of the incoming object (with associated uncertainty), and the shape, trajectory, orientation, speed and motion of the protected asset 18 in the protected region 20, the computer estimates a probability distribution function (p.d.f.) of explosion magnitudes and locations relative to the protected asset.
Based on data or models of vulnerability of the protected asset 18 to shockwaves 24 of various magnitudes from various directions (including crew injuries likely to result from shockwaves) stored in a database (either locally or available over a network), together with data or models of what the arc generator 16 can do to attenuate shockwaves in what positions and in what time interval, the computer 14 may then form a firing plan to counter the threat at minimum cost. Cost may include not only the cost to operate the arc generator 16, but also the probable cost of damage from the attenuated shockwave. In cases where the probable explosion yield is small and the probable distance of the explosion 22 from the protected region is large, the lowest cost plan may be not to deploy the system 10.
As shown in the embodiments of
In one embodiment, shown schematically in
As the density of free charge carriers in the air increases, the air becomes opaque to the incoming electromagnetic beams and rapidly absorbs energy from the beams as heat, which raises the temperature of the air as well as its density and composition, thus creating the second medium 30 to intercept the advancing shockwave 24. The composition changes of the second fluid medium 30 may include adding free electrons, which have a relatively low molar mass, ionization of molecules so that they interact more strongly and therefore propagate shockwaves at higher speeds, and breaking diatomic molecules such as molecular oxygen into single atoms, which reduces the average molar mass.
In some embodiments, the beam 34 may be a microwave beam. The arc generator 16 may include a vacuum tube amplifier (e.g., a magnetron) and focused by a static focusing device (e.g., a dish antenna or a Fresnel plate), or produced and focused by other means of combinations apparent to those skilled in the art. In other embodiments, the beam 34 is a laser beam. The laser beam may be a single beam focused to a point by optics, or multiple beams converging to a common point. In either case, the beam 34 may create single or multiple arcs 32 (
As shown in
The arc generator 16 (
In one aspect of this embodiment, the arc generator 16 creates an electrically conductive path from the power supply 38 to the selected region between the shockwave 24 and the protected region 20 to establish the arc, and back to the power supply. In one embodiment, shown in
As shown in
As shown in
As shown in
To deploy the system 10D, the arc generator 16 actuates the power supply 38 to supply current to one of more of the conductors 68, first vaporizing it, then ionizing it to form a conductive channel of vapor 70. Due to both the resultant magnetic field (J×B) force and the expansion of the hot vapor created by vaporizing the conductor, the ionized vapor moves outward from its initial position and heats and ionizes the nearby air to create the second fluid medium 30.
In one embodiment, shown in
In yet another embodiment, the sacrificial conductor 68 may be made partly or entirely of lithium. Lithium has a very low molecular weight, and consequently a higher shock speed and lower effective index of refraction than other metallic vapors. Further, it disperses into nearby air 26 more quickly, which helps to heat the air more rapidly.
In other embodiments, the arc generator 16 may be configured to attenuate the advancing shockwave by magnetic induction. As shown in
When the shockwave 24 created by an explosion 22 reaches the arc 72, as shown in
In the embodiment shown in
In a variation, the parts of the conductive channels 72 and electrodes 74, 76 may not be rigid, but the channels of ionized air pushed ahead of the magnetic flux are disrupted (broken) when they flow rapidly through the air 26. Each time a channel 72 breaks, the electric current briefly stops. When it stops, the trapped magnetic flux creates an electromotive force strong enough to ionize a new channel through the air 26 and then heat that air. This may transform energy from the shockwave 24 into ionization energy of air ions and into pressure-volume-temperature energy of expanded hot air.
In the embodiment shown in
A system 10 may be comprised of multiple copies of each embodiment. In an embodiment, a system 10 may include a single sensor 12 connected to and controlling multiple, discrete arc generators 16, each mounted on the protected asset 18. In some applications, an embodiment may produce a relatively narrow, substantially linear arc of hot, ionized air. Multiple copies of each embodiment may be used to increase the frontal area as desired. Alternatively, a single copy of an embodiment may be used multiple times in rapid succession, producing multiple arcs that collectively cover the desired protected region 20. Further, these embodiments may be combined. For example, a system 10 may utilize ionizing tracer pellets to protect an asset 18 from explosions 22 relatively far away, and employ sacrificial conductors to protect the same asset from explosions at short range.
With each of the embodiments discussed, the system 10 is deployed to attenuate the energy of an advancing shockwave 24 form an explosion 22 by creating a second fluid medium 30 that differs from the first fluid medium 26, which may be ambient air, positioned so that it interacts with the shockwave. As shown in
As shown in
In addition, the second medium 30 may absorb some shock energy as the shock travels through it. Factors contributing to the absorption of energy include energy retained in the molecules of the second medium itself (e.g., enhanced rotational energy, excited molecular bonds, excited electrons, molecular decomposition, and ionization) and shock energy converted to electromagnetic energy through blackbody emission from hot particles or photon emission from de-exciting various excited states.
A further mechanism for attenuating the energy density of the shockwave 24 is momentum exchange. If the second medium 30 is moving relative to the first medium 26, then it will exchange momentum with the shockwave 24. The result is a combination of reflection, slowing, and redirection of the shockwave. Any or all of the foregoing mechanisms may operate in a given embodiment. The composition, temperature, speed and location of the second medium 30 may be chosen or created to create any one or all of the aforementioned mechanisms.
While the method and forms of apparatus disclosed herein constitute preferred aspects of the disclosed shockwave attenuation apparatus and method, other methods and forms of apparatus may be employed without departing from the scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1195042 | Leon | Aug 1916 | A |
2405694 | Nicolas | Aug 1946 | A |
2513279 | Albert | Jul 1950 | A |
3050707 | Baker et al. | Aug 1962 | A |
3660951 | Cadwell | May 1972 | A |
3773168 | Meinass | Nov 1973 | A |
3875844 | Hicks | Apr 1975 | A |
3943870 | Paslay | Mar 1976 | A |
4215630 | Hagelberg et al. | Aug 1980 | A |
4313181 | Holm | Jan 1982 | A |
4543872 | Graham et al. | Oct 1985 | A |
5020411 | Rowan | Jun 1991 | A |
H1231 | Richards | Sep 1993 | H |
5341718 | Woodall et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5394786 | Gettle et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5400688 | Eninger et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5739458 | Girard | Apr 1998 | A |
6029558 | Stevens et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6256263 | Stevens | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6266926 | Figge et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6279449 | Ladika et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6412391 | Stevens et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6595102 | Stevens et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6653972 | Krikorian et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6782790 | Barrett | Aug 2004 | B2 |
7077049 | Shumov et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7213494 | James | May 2007 | B2 |
7350447 | Smith | Apr 2008 | B1 |
7421936 | Barger et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7437987 | Ohnstad et al. | Oct 2008 | B1 |
7827900 | Beach et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7866250 | Farinella et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7878103 | Imholt et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
8042449 | Farinella et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
8051762 | Beach et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8141470 | Farinella et al. | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8151710 | Fu et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8436730 | Fischbach et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8437223 | Barger et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8448559 | Hunn et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8555768 | Barker et al. | Oct 2013 | B1 |
8863666 | Tillotson et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20030233931 | Nemtsev | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040107827 | Edberg et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118270 | Barrett | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20070006723 | Waddell, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070180983 | Farinella et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080190276 | Barger et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090114084 | Thinn et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090266226 | Beach et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20100319524 | Farinella et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100319526 | Imholt et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110120294 | Beach et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110168004 | Henegar | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110297031 | Fu et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120060677 | Farinella | Mar 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9716697 | May 1997 | WO |
2011148165 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Review of methods to attenuate Shock/Blast waves,” Igra et al, Dec. 2012. |