The present disclosure is related to cellular telecommunication systems, and more particularly to heterogeneous and other networks with multiple low-power nodes deployed in clusters in a macro base station's coverage area.
Today's cellular communication systems provide not only voice services, but also mobile broadband services all over the world. As the number of applications for cell phones and other wireless devices continues to increase, consuming increasing amounts of data, an enormous demand for mobile broadband data services is generated. This requires telecom operators to improve data throughput and maximize the efficient utilization of limited resources.
As the spectrum efficiency for the point-to-point link approaches its theoretical limit, one way to increase data throughput is to split big cells into smaller and smaller cells. When the cells become closer to each other, however, proximate and adjacent cell interferences become more severe, and the cell splitting gain saturates. Furthermore, it is becoming more difficult to acquire new sites to install base stations for the operators and the costs are also increasing. Therefore, cell-splitting alone cannot fulfill the demands.
Recently a new type of network deployment referred to as a HetNet (Heterogeneous Network) has been proposed and is attracting interest and considerable effort in the industry. In HetNet, another tier consisting of multiple low-power nodes is added onto the existing macro base station's coverage areas. The low-power nodes are usually deployed in clusters of cells.
The cells of the Low Power Nodes (LPNs) may operate on the same carrier frequency as the macro node, or on different carrier frequencies. In various communication protocols such as 3GPP (the 3rd Generation Partnership Project standard), it has been found that a discovery of these Low Power Nodes is not always possible with the legacy mechanism. Therefore, the introduction of a new discovery signal (DS) is discussed within various communication protocols such as 3GPP.
The disclosure provides a method and wireless communication system that includes a HetNet, a serving cell with an associated coverage area and multiple additional low power nodes (LPNs) deployed in one or more clusters of cells in the coverage area. The LPNs transmit associated discovery signals based on the timing of the associated small cell. The serving cell is configured to determine the timing of the cells and therefore the transmission pattern of the discovery signals. The serving cell configures measurement gaps such that the discovery signals are transmitted during the measurement gaps and the user equipment (UE) can detect the presence of the LPN associated with the discovery signals. The network is adapted to accomplish this for various degrees of granularity and timing measurement inaccuracies by placing the measurement gaps and/or adjusting the discovery signal (DS) transmission scheme accordingly.
The present invention is best understood from the following detailed description when read in conjunction with the accompanying drawing. It is emphasized that, according to common practice, the various features of the drawing are not necessarily to scale. On the contrary, the dimensions of the various features may be arbitrarily expanded or reduced for clarity. Like numerals denote like features throughout the specification and drawing.
Devices may broadcast what are referred to as discovery signals. Discovery signals allow devices in the vicinity of one another to determine the presence of the other device and/or information that may be useful to the receiving device in determining if a connection should be established with the device transmitting the discovery signal. Discovery signals may be transmitted to communicate user identifiers, device identifiers, group identifiers, e.g., indicating membership in a particular group, service offers, product advertisements, requests for service, etc. A device may periodically transmit discovery signals to communicate the same or different information. The transmission of discovery signals allows devices entering an area to detect the presence of the transmitting device and to discover information about the device, services, etc. available from, or being sought by, the transmitting device. The discovery signal is generally identified as DS throughout the disclosure.
In a system such as a HetNet system with LPNs, it is desirable for the UE (User Equipment) to detect the presence of the low power nodes (LPNs) so that the UE can adjust its behavior accordingly and communicate with the appropriate cell/node in order for the network to operate efficiently. As above, the LPNs may transmit discovery signals.
The discovery of LPNs that operate on a different frequency from the serving cell places special demands onto the transmission scheme of the discovery signal (DS) of the LPNs. In various embodiments of the disclosure, the serving cell configures measurement gaps at the UE which uses these measurement gaps for inter-frequency measurements. In some embodiments, these measurement gaps are configured relative to the serving cell's timing. The disclosure provides for the transmission of the DS to advantageously coincide with the measurement gaps at the UE so that the UE is able to detect the DS's and the associated LPNs.
Because the DS transmission is relative to the LPN's timing, it is beneficial when the serving cell has knowledge about the LPN's timing when it configures the measurement gaps. In various 3GPP embodiments, this method is referred to as network assisted discovery. In an actual HetNet system, there may be uncertainties in the available timing information. The present disclosure analyzes and solves problems related to inaccurate timing information when performing network assisted discovery and provides methods and systems that solve such problems and provides measurement gaps during which DS transmission occurs such that the UE can receive the discovery signal during the measurement gaps.
Various embodiments described herein are discussed in the context of an LTE (Long Term Evolution) system, but the concepts, systems and methods of the disclosure are not to be construed to be restricted to LTE systems and protocols. Additionally, while the various embodiments disclosed herein are described in the context of transmission of discovery signals, it should be understood that signals for other purposes can use the schemes and methods described in this disclosure.
An embodiment of an HetNet system deployment with one macro node and two clusters of low power nodes within the macro coverage area is shown in
The disclosure is described in conjunction with an embodiment in which cells within a cluster, e.g. first cells 9 within first small cell cluster 7, transmit synchronously to each other. First and second small cell clusters 7, 13 are not necessarily synchronized with the serving cell of macro node 3. Aspects of the disclosure provide that the serving cell of macro node 3 obtains knowledge and information about the timing of first cells 9 of first small cell cluster 7 and the timing of second cells 15 of second small cell cluster 13, in order to place the measurement gaps.
The measurement gaps of the serving cell are configured relative to the serving cell's timing, but the discovery signals associated with the respective LPNs (e.g., first and second cells 9, 15) are transmitted by the LPNs relative to the timing of the low power nodes, i.e. relative to the timing of first cells 9 of first small cell cluster 7 and the timing of second cells 15 of second small cell cluster 13. When the serving cell of macro node 3 knows the timing of first cells 9 and second cells 15, and the transmission pattern(s) of the DSs at the low power nodes, i.e., first cells 9 and second cells 15, the serving cell is thus configured to place the measurement gaps accordingly so that they match with the DS transmission pattern/scheme and enable to UE to detect the DSs during the measurement gaps.
In the embodiment described herein, macro node 3 and the low power nodes, i.e. first cells 9 and second cells 15, operate on different frequencies. In one embodiment of the disclosure, UE 17 that is served by macro node 3, is configured to perform inter-frequency measurements to discover the LPN's (cells 9 and 15). In various embodiments, UE 17 performs inter frequency measurements autonomously. One example of such an embodiment is an idle LTE UE which may monitor multiple frequencies and reselect based on various criteria.
Unless the UE has multiple receivers, inter frequency measurements are typically carried out during inter-frequency measurement gaps. The inter-frequency measurements may take place during inter-frequency measurement gaps that are later reconfigured by the serving cell. During these gaps the UE can tune its radio onto the new frequency and perform measurements. No uplink or downlink data from the serving cell is scheduled during such a gap.
In one LTE embodiment, an inter-frequency measurement gap has a length of 6 ms. In some embodiments such as illustrated
In the context of the present disclosure, granularity means the accuracy with which the start of the measurement gap can be configured, i.e. the smallest timing unit that can be used to define the start of a measurement gap. In LTE embodiments, it is 1 ms. The start of a measurement gap that the UE can use is defined relative to the PSS/SSS timing of the serving cell but the DS is transmitted relative to the timing of the small cell cluster. The timing difference between the small cell cluster and the serving cell can be arbitrary, like an analog number. Even if the serving cell knows the exact timing difference it cannot compensate for this exactly all the time and thus, the granularity is used to represent the accuracy with which the start of the measurement gap can be configured.
In some cases, granularity describes the step-length between two neighboring numbers that can be represented. More generally, granularity is the step-size with which the serving cell can define the start of the measurement gap. In the 3GPP R12 specification, it is 1 ms, but the granularity takes on other values in other protocols and embodiments.
The disclosure describes various DS transmission schemes for different magnitudes of timing information inaccuracies. As above, when the serving cell discovers the timing of the small cell cluster and the transmission patterns of the DS at the low power nodes, this timing may carry with it an associated timing inaccuracy. In various embodiments, the network knows the largest possible deviation of the timing information from the real timing and then it chooses the DS transmission scheme accordingly. This concept is disclosed for the embodiment in which all LPN clusters within the coverage area of the serving cell have the same timing. The concept is then expanded to embodiments in which different clusters have different timings.
In the exemplary embodiments described in this disclosure, the serving cell uses the available timing information to appropriately place the measurement gap as discussed above and as shown in
In other embodiments, other gaps than the currently available gaps, may be used. In one embodiment, a network assistance window is used. In another embodiment, the “measurement gap” is a new LTE measurement gap, defined for the purpose of discovery. In yet another embodiment, the “measurement gap” is any instruction, scheduling restriction or reception restriction in which it is expected that a UE performs inter-frequency measurements.
The low power nodes transmit the DS according to their own timing. The serving cell, typically a macro node such as macro node 3, configures the measurement gaps according to the serving cell's timing. In other embodiments, the serving cell configures network assistance windows according to the serving cell timing.
The serving cell is typically a macro node and the UE performs inter-frequency measurements on one or several clusters of low power nodes as above. However, the concepts described herein also apply in other embodiments such as an embodiment in which the serving cell is one LPN of a cluster and inter-frequency measurements are performed on the low power nodes of a different cluster, or an embodiment in which the serving cell is one LPN of a cluster and inter-frequency measurements are performed on the macro node according to an embodiment in which the macro node is transmitting a DS as well.
In various embodiments, an arbitrary time-offset exists between the serving cell and the LPN cluster. In this embodiment, the serving cell first determines the timing of the LPN cluster and then it can configure the measurement gaps accordingly. This is illustrated in
According to one embodiment, the cluster timing is acquired in an LTE embodiment as follows. In an initial stage, low power nodes 29 deployed in all clusters, e.g. cluster 31, are always on. DS transmission takes place along signal paths 27. Then, UE 17 performs a conventional cell search in an initial inter-frequency measurement gap. Next, if the gap captures the first 5 ms of one radio frame of the measured cell, then UE 17 can decode the MIB (Master Information Block) at the same time (the first 4 OFDM symbols of slot 1) and obtain the system frame number (SFN) of the measured cell. Next, the UE 17 reports the measured SFN and/or the relative position of the primary synchronization signal (PSS) and/or secondary synchronization signal (SSS) within the gap, to the serving cell. The serving cell is then adapted to, and does derive the relative relationship of SFNs to the small cell. Since there can be two PSS/SSS within a gap, another embodiment includes UE 17 simply reporting the frame offset, or UE 17 reporting the relative time difference with some granularity, e.g. 1 ms (which is similar to reporting SFN and frame offset with 1 ms granularity).
If the gap captures the second 5 ms of one radio frame of the measured cell, then UE 17 reports a message to the macro cell 3 to indicate that the current gap pattern does not cover physical broadcast channel (PBCH) of the measured cell 29, and the message includes the relative position of PSS/SSS within the gap in order to facilitate the macro cell 3 to re-assign the appropriate gap pattern. Then macro cell 3 moves the starting point of the measurement gap according to the reported relative position of PSS/SSS within the gap so as to make the gap fully cover the PBCH, i.e., the macro cell 3 repositions the measurement gap. With the new configured gap pattern including the PBCH within the gap, UE 17 can perform the conventional cell search and perform step.
Once all of the relative timing relationship of all small cell clusters 27 are obtained, macro cell 3 notifies small cells 29 to start ordinarily on-off operations and that small cells 29 may turn off legacy PSS/SSS and PBCH transmission. The operations of the first stage can be periodically executed in case of tracking timing drifting. In some embodiments, there is one indicator that indicates to the UE, whether it should perform the first stage operations above.
The serving cell (e.g., macro cell 3) has acquired the timing information 33 of cluster 31 of low power nodes 29 as described above. In various embodiments, the serving cell is adapted to reposition/reconfigure the initial inter-frequency measurement gap and to configure the new measurement gap in such way that the DS transmission occurs directly centered in the middle of the measurement gap such as shown in
In some embodiments covered by the disclosure, there may be limitations affecting how accurately the serving cell can place the measurement gaps. These limitations may come from the granularity with which the measurement gap can be configured or from inaccuracies in the cluster timing information that is available at the serving cell. Depending on the magnitude of this inaccuracy, a measurement gap might be misplaced so that the DS would not otherwise be received by the UE if not for the principles of the disclosure.
According to the following embodiment, all clusters have the same timing but are not synchronized to the serving cell. The serving cell has no influence on the timing of the small cells of the cluster of LPN's/cells. The serving cell detects and knows the timing of the small cells, but the serving cell cannot adjust that timing. In an embodiment according to the 3GPP standard, the sub-frame offset of the measurement gap is configured by the serving cell with a granularity of 1 ms (=1 sub-frame). In this embodiment, it cannot be guaranteed that the measurement gap can be placed such that the DS is exactly in the middle of the measurement gap as in
Another potential error source which may impact the placement of the DS window in the measurement gap, is accuracy of the information that the serving cell has available about the small cell layer timing. This non-ideal timing information is hereinafter denoted Δ2, which is the error in the timing information and may be referred to as timing information inaccuracy. Many factors may have an impact on this value. Such factors include but are not limited to outdated timing information; propagation delay between serving cell and UE as well as propagation delay between UE and small cell layer; and, the method of how the serving cell acquires the small cell layer timing. The value of Δ2 is implementation-related and differs for different embodiments and deployments, network realization concepts and even different cells.
In either of the aforementioned embodiments, the present disclosure provides for generating the measurement gap such that the DS is located within the measurement gap. Further, depending on the expected deviation of the DS from the measurement gap center, the present disclosure provides different DS transmission schemes and measurement window placement strategies to assure that the DS is transmitted and readable by the UE's during the measurement gaps.
The following examples are intended to be illustrative and not limiting of the various aspects of the present disclosure.
0.5 ms+Δ2+T/2≦3 ms
In the general case, Δ1 appears in the preceding equation instead of 0.5 ms. The preceding equation (0.5 ms+Δ2+T/2≦3 ms) can be more generally expressed as Δ1+Δ2+T/2≦Tgap/2, where Tgap represents the length of the measurement of the measurement gap. In other words, if the total of the granularity, Δ1 and the measurement inaccuracy, Δ2 plus half of the duration of the DS is less than half of the length of the measurement gap, then it is guaranteed that the DS is received during the measurement gap, i.e. the DS will be completely transmitted during the measurement gap.
In the following exemplary embodiments, the value of 0.5 ms for Δ1 is used but other values for Δ1 are used in other embodiments.
The value of 3 ms used in this exemplary embodiment is equal to the half measurement gap length expressed as Tgap/2, where Tgap represents the length of the measurement gap which is 6 ms in one LTE embodiment. It is understood that this embodiment for the LTE case is presented in
0.5 ms+Δ2−T/2<3 ms
In this embodiment, shown in
In an embodiment of this example in which the original DS is not completely within measurement gap 37, the disclosure provides for three adjacent copies of the DS to be transmitted by the LPNs as shown in
The concept of
In the equations of Equation Set #1, an equal number of DS transmission is carried out before and after the original DS. The embodiment Δ2≦2.5 ms+3 T/2 is illustrated in
Equation Set #1 demonstrates that very large timing inaccuracies require transmission of many copies of the DS if all copies are transmitted adjacent to each other in order to insure that there is a DS within the measurement gap. Therefore, in some embodiments, copies of the DS are transmitted with a guard time in between them to increase efficiencies
In some embodiments, the guard time used between the DS's, depends on the duration time of the DS, (“T”) and the duration of the measurement gap (or the duration of a network assistance window), Tgap. In some embodiments, tguard=Tgap−T.
The measurement gap configured by the serving cell, is targeted to be centered around the middle (original) DS 49. This is illustrated in further detail in
As long as the maximum timing error (excluding the granularity error) is less than 1.5*(Tgap−T)−0.5 ms, one copy of the DS can be received completely within the measurement gap. In other embodiments, the value for tguard can also be chosen according to the worst expected error in the timing information. As long as the worst case error is less than that calculated in Equation Set #2, a tighter transmission of the DS copies is possible.
The following examples involve timing inaccuracies larger than in previously described examples, i.e., larger than 1.5*(Tgap−T)−0.5 ms. If the timing inaccuracy is larger than that calculated in Equation Set #2, then more copies of non-adjacent DS's are transmitted according to various embodiment of the disclosure. Equation Set #2 can be generalized as Equation Set #3, below:
where kεN0. When the maximum timing error is bound by the expression in Equation Set #3, then k copies of the DS are transmitted before and k copies of the DS are transmitted after the original DS. The distance between two neighboring, non-adjacent DS's is consistently tguard throughout the DS transmission scheme. The total number of DS transmitted is always uneven in this example.
In some examples, the measurement gap is targeted to be centered between two successive, non-adjacent DSs, as illustrated in
Equation Set #4 provides a calculation for the maximum timing error that can be handled with this approach:
According to the embodiment of Equation Set #4, with two DS transmissions, the maximum tolerable time inaccuracy in which the DS transmission takes place during the measurement gap, is “Tgap−T−0.5 ms”. In other embodiments, larger even numbers of DS can be transmitted, e.g. 4, 6, 8 and so on.
In embodiments in which the measurement gap is targeted to be centered in the middle between the DS copies, larger timing errors than what are described in Equation Set #4 can be handled. A general formula for the largest tolerable timing error depending on the number of DS copies that are transmitted is given in Equation Set #5.
where kεN0. The maximum tolerable timing error is bound by “k.” In total, “2 k+2” equidistant transmissions of the DS are carried out.
Additional embodiments involve piecewise reception of DS. In the previous embodiments, the entire DS was to be received within the same measurement gap and in a certain order. In some embodiments, one DS is received in its whole, i.e. a DS is not further split into smaller parts which are received out of order or with additional time between the smaller DS's. In other embodiments, a DS may be split into smaller parts that may be received out of order and/or with additional time between them. In another embodiment the DS is split into parts, with all the parts to be received during one measurement gap, but not necessarily in the right order. The concept of the “right order” is explained as follows: In an embodiment in which the DS is split into several parts, e.g. DS0+DS1, the different parts are transmitted at different time-instants. The “right order” is DS0 being transmitted before DS1. The “right order” of reception would be if the UE receives DS0 before DS1. For some measurement gap configurations, it could be the case that first the DS1 is received and then DS0 is received from a later copy of the DS and in this example the discovery signals are not received in the right order.
In some embodiments, copies of parts of the DS are created and placed repeatedly. This ensures that the within certain error bounds the whole signal can be received within one measurement gap. The parts of the DS are not required to be received in order according to this embodiment.
An embodiment in which Ta+Δ2+0.5 ms is larger than 3 ms, is illustrated in
Another embodiment for the case that Tb+Δ2+0.5 ms is larger than 3 ms, is illustrated in
The examples illustrated in
In
In
In still further embodiments, the parts of the DS need not be transmitted adjacent one another in order to be transmitted during the measurement gap provided by the serving cell. This is illustrated in
In other embodiments such as shown in
One procedure for the embodiment of
While one or more embodiments of the disclosure have been described above, it should be understood that they have been presented by way of example only, and not by way of limitation. Likewise, the various figures or diagrams may depict an example architectural or other configuration for the disclosure, which is done to aid in understanding the features and functionality that can be included in the disclosure. The disclosure is not restricted to the illustrated example architectures or configurations, but can be implemented using a variety of alternative architectures and configurations.
One or more of the functions described in this document may be performed by an appropriately configured module. The term “module” as used herein, can refer to hardware, firmware, software and any associated hardware that executes the software, and any combination of these elements for performing the associated functions described herein. Additionally, various modules can be discrete modules; however, as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art, two or more modules may be combined to form a single module that performs the associated functions according various embodiments of the invention.
Additionally, one or more of the functions described in this document may be performed by means of computer program code that is stored in a “computer program product”, “non-transitory computer-readable medium”, and the like, which is used herein to generally refer to media such as, memory storage devices, or storage unit. These, and other forms of computer-readable media, may be involved in storing one or more instructions for use by processor to cause the processor to perform specified operations. Such instructions, generally referred to as “computer program code” (which may be grouped in the form of computer programs or other groupings), which when executed, enable the computing system to perform the desired operations.
It will be appreciated that, for clarity purposes, the above description has described embodiments of the invention which can be implemented using different functional units and processors. However, it will be apparent that any suitable distribution of functionality between different functional units, processors or domains may be used without detracting from the invention. For example, functionality illustrated to be performed by separate units, processors or controllers may be performed by the same unit, processor or controller. Hence, references to specific functional units are only to be seen as references to suitable means for providing the described functionality, rather than indicative of a strict logical or physical structure or organization
The preceding merely illustrates the principles of the disclosure. It will thus be appreciated that those skilled in the art will be able to devise various arrangements which, although not explicitly described or shown herein, embody the principles of the invention and are included within its spirit and scope. Furthermore, all examples and conditional language recited herein are principally intended expressly to be only for pedagogical purposes and to aid the reader in understanding the principles of the disclosure and the concepts contributed by the inventors to furthering the art, and are to be construed as being without limitation to such specifically recited examples and conditions. Moreover, all statements herein reciting principles, aspects, and embodiments of the disclosure, as well as specific examples thereof, are intended to encompass both structural and functional equivalents thereof. Additionally, it is intended that such equivalents include both currently known equivalents and equivalents developed in the future, i.e., any elements developed that perform the same function, regardless of structure.
This description of the exemplary embodiments is intended to be read in connection with the figures of the accompanying drawing, which are to be considered part of the entire written description. In the description, relative terms such as “lower,” “upper,” “horizontal,” “vertical,” “above,” “below,” “up,” “down,” “top” and “bottom” as well as derivatives thereof (e.g., “horizontally,” “downwardly,” “upwardly,” etc.) should be construed to refer to the orientation as then described or as shown in the drawing under discussion. These relative terms are for convenience of description and do not require that the apparatus be constructed or operated in a particular orientation. Terms concerning attachments, coupling and the like, such as “connected” and “interconnected,” refer to a relationship wherein structures are secured or attached to one another either directly or indirectly through intervening structures, as well as both movable or rigid attachments or relationships, unless expressly described otherwise.
Although the disclosure has been described in terms of embodiments, it is not limited thereto. Rather, the appended claims should be construed broadly, to include other variants and embodiments, which may be made by those skilled in the art without departing from the scope and range of equivalents.
This application is a 371 National Phase Application from International Application No. PCT/US2015/020675, filed Mar. 16, 2015 and claims benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) to U.S. Provisional Application 61/955,945, filed Mar. 20, 2014, entitled “Method for Signal Transmission with Network Assistance”, the contents of which are hereby expressly incorporated by reference as if set forth in their entirety herein.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2015/020675 | 3/16/2015 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61955945 | Mar 2014 | US |