1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates generally to a standardized method of testing and classifying undergarment control. More particularly, the present invention relates to a standardized method of testing undergarment control using a clamp mechanism in a commercially available machine and a resultant standardized classification of undergarment control.
2. Description of the Related Art
Undergarments, specifically women's panties, are advertised with respect to the level of support they provide to the wearer. The three general classifications used to describe the level of support for women's panties are light, moderate and firm support. Women purchase these garments with the belief that the product will perform in accordance with its advertised level of support. Underlying their decision to purchase a panty of a particular support level is the belief that the panty has been tested to perform as advertised. However, there does not exist a standard method to test the level of support that women's undergarments, specifically panties, provide to the wearer. Thus, there does not exist a standard classification system of undergarment control.
Undergarment manufacturers may test the level of support of the component materials that are assembled to make the garments. However, these materials are tested only before the materials are assembled and sewn together as a completed garment, such as a panty. There is no further machine testing to determine the level of support that the finished garment provides.
Currently, women's undergarment manufacturers test the support of panties by using an empirical method. Testers put their two fists in the hole openings for the legs and move their arms apart. Based on the level of resistance to stretching that the tester senses, the panty is classified as a light, moderate or firm support garment. This sort of empirical testing method is not scientific, consistent or repeatable. The tester may place his/her fists at different locations inside different panties during successive tests. The tester may also use different forces to separate his/her arms while testing the same panty or different panties. Further, the tester may not use a constant rate of expansion as his/her arms open with the same panty or with different panties. Also, the tester may fatigue during the testing of a number of panties and thereby improperly report a higher level of resistance than he/she would have reported during earlier testing of the same panty or of different panties. These variables prevent accurate standardized measurement and classification of the support levels of panties. Essentially, the human element in the test makes the current test method unreliable.
A need therefore exists for a standardized testing method to accurately determine the level of support of panties and a standardized classification system for the level of support provided in such panties.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a pair of clamps to hold panties at a uniform location from which measurements on a number of panties are taken.
It is an object of the present invention to provide a pair of clamps having a specific configuration.
It is another object of the present invention to properly align the panties prior to testing to provide accurate measurements.
It is still another object of the present invention to stretch the panties using a consistent force to obtain a consistent elongation and modulus when measuring.
It is yet another object of the present invention to use a test method that provides a pre-load to remove the variability from measurements.
It is still yet another object of the present invention to use consistently accurate objective measurement criteria to properly measure the panties.
It is a further object of the present invention to classify the panties according to their support level.
It is a further objective of the present invention to provide a classification system that accurately represents the advertised level of undergarment support.
It is still a further object of the present invention to pre-program the test device with specific parameters.
These and other objects and advantages of the present invention are achieved by an automated device used to measure and the standardized test method of the present invention. The clamps of the present invention are preferably mounted in a standard commercially available constant rate of extension (CRE) machine. The clamps of the present invention are placed with a specific separation in the CRE machine to properly hold the garments in preparation for testing. The test method uses panties that have been prepared according to specific test criteria and the CRE machine preprogrammed with specific parameters.
Before testing commences, the midpoint of an individual panty side is placed at the center of one of the clamps. The CRE machine is preprogrammed to have a specific preload and a specific rate of extension between the clamps when the clamps first commence separation. After a pre-determined resistance is sensed from the panty sides by the CRE machine, the rate of extension and the load instantly increase to test the panty's percent of elongation and modulus. This method is repeated for several styles and sizes of panties to obtain accurate, consistent elongation and modulus measurements for each style and size. These measurements thus categorize all of the measured styles and sizes into a standardized panty support classification system.
The foregoing and still other objects and advantages of the present invention will be more apparent from the following detailed explanation of the preferred embodiments of the invention in connection with the accompanying drawings.
a illustrates the classification of different representative model numbers and sizes of panties according to the current system;
b illustrates the classification system of different representative model numbers and sizes according to the new classification system of the present invention; and
Referring to the drawings and in particular,
The testing machine 1 must also be programmed according to specific parameters. The parameters are defined below:
Pre-Flex cycles=0
Clamp to clamp separation=279.5 mm.
Pre-load=0.1 kg
Pre-load Speed=350 mm/min
Test Load=4.0 kg
Test Speed=508 mm/min
According to a preferred embodiment of the invention, a commercially available Zwick™ CRE test machine model Zwick™ 1446 is used. It should be noted that other analogous CRE machines could be used provided they can accept clamps 2 and 3 of
Prior to testing, the panties and the CRE machine 1 must be prepared. Each panty is relaxed on a flat surface at a standard atmospheric condition of 70° F.±2° F. temperature (or 21° C.±1° C.) and 65%±2% relative humidity. After the panties have been in this condition for a minimum of four hours, they are proper for textile testing. Before actual testing of each properly prepared panty, the tester will confirm the effective weight, number of cycles, outgoing/incoming curve and modulus points, to be read for each sample.
Following panty preparation, CRE machine 1 must be pre-programmed according to certain parameters. Prior to stretching the panty, the initial pre-load and rate of extension of CRE machine 1 are set at low levels. The initial clamp extension occurs at these low levels until CRE machine 1 senses a pre-determined level of resistance from the sides of the panty. Then, the test load and the speed of separation in between the clamps increase sharply. Several different panty styles and sizes are tested to obtain the test results and the necessary information for the new support classification system.
Referring to
In an initial condition as shown in
Referring to
Referring to
In CRE machine 1, clamp 3 is held in a fixed position while clamp 2 moves away from clamp 3. However, clamp 3 can be movable while clamp 2 is stationary, or clamps 2 and 3 can be movable towards and away from each other depending on the standard commercial machine or device used to employ clamps 2 and 3.
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The method and system ensure consumers of proper levels of control, for Santoni and cut/sew garments, and more particularly for panties and all-in-one undergarments. Thus, superior comfort, fit and style are achieved by a method and system with clearly measurable, consistent standards.
The present invention has been described with particular reference to the preferred embodiment. It should be understood that the foregoing descriptions and examples are only illustrative of the present invention. Various alternatives and modifications thereof can be devised by those skilled in the art without departing from the spirit and scope of the present invention. Accordingly, the present invention is intended to embrace all such alternatives, modifications, and variations that fall within the scope of the appended claims.
This application is filed pursuant to 37 C.F.R. § 1.53(b) and is a Divisional of patent application Ser. No. 10/910,959, filed Aug. 4, 2004, now U.S. Pat. No. 7,401,529, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/492,873 and Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/492,737, both filed on Aug. 6, 2003, the contents of which are incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1817617 | Gosch | Aug 1931 | A |
2187914 | Reitan | Jan 1940 | A |
2706402 | Jones, Sr. | Apr 1955 | A |
3444728 | Burns | May 1969 | A |
3471068 | Foreman | Oct 1969 | A |
3730405 | Ezell et al. | May 1973 | A |
3879990 | Joy | Apr 1975 | A |
4136557 | Bell, Jr. et al. | Jan 1979 | A |
4245512 | Saunders | Jan 1981 | A |
4873878 | Milton | Oct 1989 | A |
5094110 | Porter et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5123175 | van der Kuur | Jun 1992 | A |
5235860 | Horton et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5541394 | Kouchi et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5605739 | Stokes et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5659740 | Ezaki et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5944237 | Gouldson | Aug 1999 | A |
6381510 | Amidhozour et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6487902 | Ghosh | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6493678 | Foster et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6665577 | Onyshkevych et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6793650 | Weber | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6915276 | Foster et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6949089 | Olson et al. | Sep 2005 | B2 |
20030125695 | Dorschner | Jul 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
003434068 | Mar 1986 | DE |
411061635 | Mar 1999 | JP |
02001113100 | Apr 2001 | JP |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080257062 A1 | Oct 2008 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60492873 | Aug 2003 | US | |
60492737 | Aug 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10910959 | Aug 2004 | US |
Child | 12147782 | US |