The invention concerns a method and system for storage and transport of liquefied petroleum gases, normally known as LPG, on a tanker vessel, hereinafter referred to as LPG carriers, and particularly the transport of two cargoes on the same shipment.
Further, the present method and system are equally applicable for the use on floating production storage and Offloading vessels for liquefied petroleum gases, LPG FPSO, and similarly the use on floating storage and offloading vessels for liquefied petroleum gases, LPG FSO.
The term LPG carriers defined above shall hereinafter also include both LPG FPSO's and LPG FSO's.
LPG is to be understood as a range of different grades or products of petroleum gases stored and transported as liquid. Of the various petroleum gases propane and butane are the principal examples in which propane typically includes any concentration of ethane from 0% up to 5% and butane can be any mixture of normal-butane and iso-butane. In addition LPG should as a minimum include:
ammonia
butadiene
butane-propane mixture (any mixture)
butylenes
diethyl ether
propylene
vinyl chloride
LPG's are transported in liquid form either at pressures greater than atmospheric or at temperatures below ambient, or a combination of both. This invention relates to:
LPG stored and transported at temperatures below ambient releases continuously a certain amount of vapor. The normal manner of maintaining the pressure in the cargo tanks is to extract the released vapor, then being liquefied and returned back to the cargo tanks as condensate.
Hereinafter, condensate is to be understood as liquefied vapor whereas vapor is meant to be the product of vapors consisting of vapors generated by heat input to the LPG and any vapor generated when the condensate is returned.
A cargo type is any of the LPG grades or products mentioned above. As an example first cargo type and second cargo type could be propane and butane, respectively.
In this description, a reliquefaction unit is hereinafter meant to be a refrigeration unit which duty is to liquefy vapor and the prefix “re” points to liquefaction of vapor from liquefied gases. A cargo tank is one or more liquid tight containers intended to hold LPG. Standby operation is using, for instance, a unit ready to be used when needed.
Normally, one to two cargoes are carried per shipment. Amongst the different types of LPG cargoes, the products can typically be propane and butane. The latter are segregated into dedicated cargo tanks and all cargo handling is handled in a manner without mixing liquid and vapor from the two cargoes. This includes segregated operations at least for the following cargo handling operations:
Typically, the previously known LPG carriers capable of handling two cargoes have three to four reliquefaction units installed to handle vapor from the two cargoes simultaneously.
One size type of LPG carriers, the very large gas carriers, VLGC, have typically installed four identical reliquefaction units. Whilst a second size type LPG carrier, the medium size gas carrier, MSGC, have typically installed three identical reliquefaction units. In both cases, the reliquefaction units are fully independent of one another and are of the type being totally refrigerated.
A typical operational modus for a VLGC carrying two LPG cargoes, such as e.g. propane and butane, has two reliquefaction units handling propane vapor, one reliquefaction unit handling butane vapor, and one reliquefaction unit is in standby. For an MSGC carrying propane and butane, for instance, one reliquefaction unit is typically handling propane vapor, one reliquefaction unit butane vapor, and one reliquefaction in standby, respectively.
For reference and illustration,
As illustrated in
Each reliquefaction unit comprises typically minimum one compressor 1.100, 1.200, see
A typical VLGC with four liquid tight containers A to D is designed for carrying a number of different cargoes of which the coldest cargo to be considered is propane. The calculated heat leakage into the cargo arrangement totals to e.g. 427 kW and, then, the heat leakage into each cargo tank arrangement is:
Cargo tank arrangement is to be understood as the cargo tank and all associated piping and equipment external to the liquid tight containers.
Total installed refrigerant capacity shall thus not be less than 427 kW plus sufficient redundancy to meet the requirements set forth by international classification societies and the International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk, the IGC Code. Based on operational issues the ship owners have typically additional requirements for further increased refrigerant capacity.
As a consequence a VLGC is typically equipped with four reliquefaction units, each unit normally with a reliquefaction capacity above 220 kW. Typically, each unit is capable of handling 2230 kg propane vapor per hour. Total evaporation from a VLGC carrying only propane typically amount to 3890 kg/hr. Capacities are naturally a function of ambient temperatures and type of cargo and change accordingly.
For the same VLGC carrying iso-butane the total heat leakage is 240 kW and each reliquefaction unit has a reliquefaction capacity of typically 340 kW. Total evaporation from a VLGC carrying only iso-butane typically amount to 1350 kg/hr.
When the VLGC carries both of the above cargoes a segregated operation applies. Assuming iso-butane loaded in liquid tight container A & B and propane loaded in liquid tight container C & D, the vapor flow of propane and iso-butane is approximately 1895 kg/hr and 690 kg/hr, respectively. For such a scenario, two reliquefaction units are in operation, one for propane and one for iso-butane. If the LPG carrier has propane in three cargo tanks, three reliquefaction units are in operation, two for propane and one for iso-butane.
Due to excessive capacity for each of the reliquefaction units in operation, operation of these units are normally intermittent, e.g. 12 hours operation 12 hours standby.
Thus, the main object of the present invention is to propose a simplified solution minimizing the number of reliquefaction units needed to take properly care of all vapors of the different cargo types.
This is according to one aspect the invention achieved by a method for storage and transport of LPG on LPG carriers, in particular two cargoes of different LPG types on same shipment, having reliquefaction units in which vaporized gases are condensed and then returned into at least one cargo tank for the respective LPG cargo type, comprising:
using the reliquefaction units, at a minimum one running, so as to condense vapor from the first cargo type;
passing the condensed vapor through a heat exchanger;
simultaneously flowing vapor from the second cargo type through the heat exchanger so as to condense the vapor by means of heat exchanging with the condensed vapor; and
returning the condensed vapors leaving the heat exchanger back into the respective cargo types.
Moreover, the invention relates to a system for storage and transport of LPG on LPG carriers, in particular two cargoes of different LPG types on same shipment, having reliquefaction units in which vaporized gases are condensed and then returned into at least one cargo tank for the respective LPG cargo type, wherein:
the reliquefaction units, at a minimum one running, is used to condense vapor from the first cargo type;
the condensed vapor is passed through a heat exchanger;
vapor from the second cargo type is simultaneously flowed through the heat exchanger to condense the vapor by means of heat exchanging with the condensed vapor; and
the condensed vapors leaving the heat exchanger is returned back into the respective cargo types.
Some of the benefits by the proposed method and system are that the number of running reliquefaction is reduced to a minimum of one unit and that condensed vapor leaving the running reliquefaction unit can be used as a refrigerant in the heat exchanger.
To meet the pressure in the respective cargo tank for the first cargo type, the condensed vapor from the reliquefaction unit can be throttled upstream or downstream of the heat exchanger. The throttling can alternatively be performed in two stages.
The heat exchanger can be installed on a high point location on the LPG carrier so as to allow the condensed vapors to freely flow back into the cargo tanks. However, if free flow back to a respective cargo tank for the second cargo type is impeded, the condensed vapor to be returned into the second cargo type could be pumped.
To provide an elevated condensation pressure and, thus, allow for a more flexible location of the heat exchanger, vapor of the second cargo type can be compressed upstream of the heat exchanger.
The condensed vapor of the first cargo type can be returned from the heat exchanger through a separator so as to separate vapor and liquid phase, and liquid returned back into the first cargo type. To provide for a higher inlet pressure at the running reliquefaction unit, separated vapor can be passed through an ejector.
To minimize running time on machinery, a reciprocating compressor in the reliquefaction units is operated by means of an electric motor and, when allowable, speeding up the motor above normal so as to use the power potential thereof.
The present invention is discussed below with reference to preferred embodiments presented in the accompanying drawings, in which:
As mentioned above and illustrated in
Although the reduced number has a minimum of two reliquefaction units, other options is possible For instance, one reliquefaction unit with redundant rotating machinery could be used. Other configurations are also applicable, e.g. having three units.
Note that the type of reliquefaction unit is not crucial when utilizing the invention. However, for convenience it is assumed same type of reliquefaction unit corresponding to the prior art but with typically twice the capacity.
Vapor that evaporates from the first cargo type contained in one or more cargo tanks 100 flows via a line 1 to the reliquefaction unit 300 to be condensed and, thereafter, returned via a line 5. Condensate flows from the reliquefaction unit 300 via a throttle valve 600, in which the pressure is reduced to meet the pressure in the cargo tank(s) 100. After throttling, the condensate or, depending on the process conditions of the reliquefaction plant, the mixed phase fluid enters a heat exchanger 500, in which the condensate is used as the heat sink. At exit of the heat exchanger 500, the condensate leaves in the form of a mixed phase fluid and flows back to the cargo tank(s) 100. The heat exchanger 500 is preferably a free flow condenser.
Although, only one heat exchanger is shown in the drawings, it should be understood that more heat exchanger 500 could be installed. In such an instance the condensed vapor from the reliquefaction unit 300 is divided in an appropriate manner and passed through the respective heat exchangers.
Vapor that evaporates from the second cargo type contained in at least one cargo tank 200 flows via a line 6 to the heat exchanger 500 and the vapor is condensed and returned back to the cargo tank(s) 200 via a line 7. The vapor flow is by means of natural circulation. No compressors or other mechanical means are needed, such as e.g. an ejector, to propel the vapor from cargo tank 200 into heat exchanger 500 to be condensed and returned.
The refrigerant duty required to condense all vapor associated with the second cargo type is taken from the available spare refrigerant capacity of the reliquefaction unit handling all vapor associated with the first cargo type. Condensate from the refrigeration unit 300 is thus used as a refrigerant in the heat exchanger 500 to condense the vapor from the second cargo type.
The heat exchanger 500 is preferably installed on a high point location on the LPG carrier allowing the condensed vapor to freely flow back to the cargo tanks 100, 200. A high point location can be on top of the cargo compressor room, on the pipe rack running along the LPG carrier, on a high point on any existing deck module or on a dedicated high point structure.
Handling of all associated vapor from the first cargo type is in principle identical to the “Prior Art” but differs with respect to the increased vapor flow rate caused by the fact that the condensate returned to the tank(s) 100 is first used to condense all associated vapor from the second cargo type before returned to the cargo tank(s) 100. The net condensate returned to the first cargo type in the cargo tank(s) 100 corresponds to the net evaporated cargo vapor being evaporation caused by heat added to the cargo tank(s) 100.
The function according to the invention is based on the fact that each reliquefaction unit is designed for handling a ship being fully loaded with its coldest design cargo, typically propane and when some of this cargo capacity is taken up by a warmer cargo, e.g. butane, it is available an excessive refrigeration capacity that can be used to condense the warmer part cargo.
The excessive refrigeration capacity is utilized by transferring heat added to the warmer cargo side into the colder cargo side and, thus, circulating a higher cold vapor flow than if two segregated arrangements are in operation.
The present example illustrates the operations for a LPG carrier loaded with two grades on board a VLGC. Iso-butane is loaded in two cargo tanks, tank A & B, and propane is loaded in two other cargo tanks, tank C & D.
Approximately 690 kg/hr of iso-butane flows naturally towards heat exchanger 500 and typically enters the heat exchanger at a temperature of −3° C. The total refrigerant duty required to cool and condense this flow of iso-butane is about 7/kW. The total refrigerant duty required to cool and condense the propane flow is about 219 kW. One reliquefaction unit has a total refrigeration capacity of 427 kW.
Other sizes of reliquefaction units occur for other sizes of LPG carriers.
As depicted in
When needed, the heat exchanger 500 can alternatively be located at a lower elevation than the piping running back to the cargo tanks 100, 200 but, then, a circulation pump 700 must be installed, see
Alternatively, a small blower or compressor 800 can be installed upstream of heat exchanger 500 providing a slightly elevated condensation pressure and thus also allowing for a more flexible location of heat exchanger 500, see
As shown in
To minimize running time on machinery the reliquefaction units are operated intermittently. This is done by allowing the pressure in the cargo tanks to increase to a high level, then start the reliquefaction units and reduce the pressure in the cargo tanks. Actual running time is governed by several factors as e.g. ambient temperatures, amount of volatile components in the cargo and sea conditions. Volatile components in the LPG are typically ethane and normally varied between 0 and 5 mol %. Higher concentrations of ethane may occasionally occur.
The compressor 1.100 and 1.200 shown in
A reciprocating compressor is a positive displacement compressor where for a given compressor its volumetric capacity is given by its design and thus operates at its maximum volumetric capacity at any given time. Since not only running time but also the compression work is governed by conditions as ambient temperatures and amount of volatile components in the gas to be compressed the electric motor 1.900 does not necessarily run on its maximum continuous rating.
To utilize the power potential of the electric motor it is proposed to speed up the motor rpm above normal rpm when conditions described above allows for it, this will be done by increasing the frequency of the power supply 1.950 to frequencies above normal. The volumetric capacity of a displacement compressor increases proportionally with speed and hence the refrigerant capacity also increases and thus running time reduces.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
20092477 | Jun 2009 | NO | national |
This application is a division of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 13/143,023, filed Sep. 28, 2011, which is a U.S. National Stage patent application of PCT/NO2010/000166, filed May 3, 2010, which claims priority to Norwegian Patent Application No. 20092477, filed Jun. 30, 2009, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in the present disclosure in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3011321 | Clauson | Dec 1961 | A |
3857145 | Yamaguchi et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3857245 | Jones et al. | Dec 1974 | A |
3857251 | Alleaume | Dec 1974 | A |
6269656 | Johnston | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6530241 | Pozivil | Mar 2003 | B2 |
20010042377 | Pozivil | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20030033809 | Konezciny | Feb 2003 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
101118077 | Feb 2008 | CN |
3225300 | Jan 1984 | DE |
1401584 | Jul 1975 | GB |
52-39277 | Mar 1977 | JP |
52-41384 | Mar 1977 | JP |
55-033777 | Mar 1980 | JP |
1-320400 | Dec 1989 | JP |
4-312296 | Nov 1992 | JP |
6-294497 | Oct 1994 | JP |
2000-503108 | Mar 2000 | JP |
2002-274493 | Sep 2002 | JP |
2005-146856 | Jun 2005 | JP |
2009-030675 | Feb 2009 | JP |
WO-9843029 | Oct 1998 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Preliminary Report on Patentability received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/NO2010/000166, dated Jan. 12, 2012, 7 pages. |
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201510259940.7, dated Jun. 24, 2016, 3 pages of English Translation. |
Rummelhoff et al., U.S. Office Action dated Nov. 4, 2016, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,279, 10 pages. |
Rummelhoff et al., U.S. Office Action dated Feb. 10, 2017, directed to U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,279, 13 pages. |
Notice of Reasons for Rejection dated Feb. 5, 2013, directed to JP Application No. 2011-553970; 4 pages. |
Notification of the First Office Action dated Jun. 26, 2013, directed to CN Application No. 201080005936.3; 12 pages. |
Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/143,023, dated Dec. 31, 2014, 10 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/143,023, dated Jun. 12, 2014, 8 pages. |
Non-Final Office Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/143,023, dated May 6, 2015, 10 pages. |
Norwegian Search Report received for Norwegian Patent Application No. 20092477, dated Jan. 29, 2010, 2 pages (with English Translation). |
Office Action received for Chinese Patent Application No. 201080005936.3, dated Jun. 26, 2013, 12 pages (English Translation only). |
Office Action received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2011-553970, dated Feb. 5, 2013, 4 pages (English Translation only). |
Restriction requirement received for U.S. Appl. No. 13/143,023, dated Mar. 14, 2014, 8 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/NO2010/000166, dated Oct. 13, 2010, 9 pages. |
Advisory Action received for U.S. Appl. No. 15/084,279, dated May 1, 2017, 4 pages. |
Decision of Rejection received for Japanese Patent Application No. 2016-050614, dated Jul. 3, 2017, 3 pages (Translation also 3 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160281930 A1 | Sep 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 13143023 | US | |
Child | 15084318 | US |