Patent Grant
9001803
This application is a national phase application based on PCT/EP2007/011140, filed Dec. 19, 2007, the content of which is incorporated herein by reference.
The present invention relates in general to wireless communication systems, in particular to a method and apparatus for recombining received/transmitted signals in a switched beam antenna. The present invention also relates to a Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) device provided with a switched beam antenna with radio frequency (RF) combining of received/transmitted signals.
A Wireless Local Area Network (WLAN) uses radio frequency (RF) signals to transmit and receive data over the air. WLAN systems transmit on unlicensed spectrum as agreed upon by the major regulatory agencies of countries around the world, such as ETSI (European Telecommunications Standard Institute) for Europe and FCC (Federal Communications Commission) for United States.
Wireless LANs allow the user to share data and Internet access without the inconvenience and cost of pulling cables through walls or under floors. The benefits of WLANs are not limited to computer networking. As the bandwidth of WLANs increases, audio/video services might be the next target, replacing device-to-device cabling as well as providing distribution throughout home, offices and factories.
Fundamentally, a WLAN configuration consists of two essential network elements: an Access Point (AP) and a client or mobile station (STA). Access points act as network hubs and routers. Typically, at the back end, an access point connects to a wider LAN or even to the Internet itself. At the front-end the access point acts as a contact point for a flexible number of clients. A station (STA) moving into the effective broadcast radius of an access point (AP) can then connect to the local network served by the AP as well as to the wider network connected to the AP back-end.
In WLAN deployment, coverage and offered throughput are impacted by several interacting factors that are considered to meet the corresponding requirements. Wireless signals suffer attenuations as they propagate through space, especially inside buildings where walls, furniture and other obstacles cause absorption, reflections and refractions. In general the farther is the STA from the AP, the weaker is the signal it receives and the lower the physical data rates that it can reliably achieve. The radio link throughput is a function of a number of factors including the used transmission format and the packet error rate (PER) measured at the receiver. A high PER may defeat the speed advantage of a transmission format with higher nominal throughput by causing too many retransmissions. However, WLAN devices constantly monitor the quality of the signals received from devices with which they communicate. When their turn to transmit comes, they use this information to select the transmission format that is expected to provide the highest throughput. In any case, on the average, the actual data rate falls off in direct relation to the distance of the STA from the AP.
Nowadays, high performance WLAN systems are required to provide high data rate services over more and more extended coverage areas. Furthermore, they have to operate reliably in different types of environments (home, office). In other words, future high performance WLAN systems are expected to have better quality and coverage, be more power and bandwidth efficient, and to be deployed in different environments.
Most current local area network equipment operates in the 2.4 GHz industrial, scientific and medical (ISM) band. This band has the advantage of being available worldwide on a license-exempt basis, but it is expected to congest rapidly. Thus, the spectrum regulatory body of each country restricts signal power levels of various frequencies to accommodate needs of users and avoid RF interference. Most countries deem wireless LANs as license free. In order to qualify for license free operation, however, the radio devices limit power levels to relatively low values. In Europe, the Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) has defined a limiting condition in the ECC Report 57: “(O)RLANS in the Frequency Band 2400-2483.5 MHz”, specifying the current regulations concerning the maximum allowed Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power (EIRP). The limiting condition has been fixed so that the output power of the equipment results in a maximum radiated power of 100 mW (20 dBm) EIRP or less. It follows that, depending on the type of antenna used, the output power of the equipment may be reduced to produce a maximum radiated power of 100 mW EIRP or less. Combinations of power levels and antennas resulting in a radiated power level above 100 mW are considered as not compliant with national radio interface regulation.
The EIRP represents the combined effect of the power supplied to the antenna and the antenna gain, minus any loss due to cabling and connections:
EIRP(dBm)=PTX(dBm)+GTX(dB)−LTX(dB)
where PTX is the power supplied to the transmitting antenna, GTX is the antenna gain defined with respect to an isotropic radiator and LTX is the cabling loss.
Since the EIRP includes the antenna gain, this introduces a limitation to the kind of antennas that can be used at the transmitter. In order to employ an antenna with higher gain, the transmitted power is reduced, so that the EIRP remains below 20 dBm.
Solutions to the coverage range enhancement problem, which are already known in literature, use system configurations that exploit multiple omni-directional antennas in which the different signals are demodulated separately by means of distinct radio frequency (RF) processing chains and subsequently recombined digitally at baseband (BB) level, as illustrated e.g. in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,907,272 and in 6,438,389.
More advanced antenna architectures are based on the combination of multiple directional antennas. Among these systems, Switched Beam (SB) antenna architectures are based on multiple directional antennas having fixed beams with heightened sensitivity in particular directions. These antenna systems detect the value of a particular quality of service (QoS) indicator, such as for example the signal strength or the signal quality, received from the different beams and choose the particular beam providing the best value of QoS. The procedure for the beam selection is periodically repeated in order to track the variations of the propagation channel so that a WLAN RF transceiver is continuously switched from one beam to another.
Antenna apparatus with selectable antenna elements is illustrated in WO 2006/023247, which discloses a planar antenna apparatus including a plurality of individually selectable planar antenna elements, each of which has a directional radiation pattern with gain and with polarization substantially in the plane of the planar antenna apparatus. Each antenna element may be electrically selected (e.g., switched on or off) so that the planar antenna apparatus may form a configurable radiation pattern. If all elements are switched on, the planar apparatus forms an omnidirectional radiation pattern.
A combined radiation pattern resulting from two or more antenna elements being coupled to the communication device may be more or less directional than the radiation pattern of a single antenna element.
The system may select a particular configuration of selected antenna elements that minimizes interference of the wireless link or that maximizes the gain between the system and the remote device.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,992,621 relates to wireless communication systems using passive beamformers. In particular, it describes a method to improve the performance by depopulating one or more ports of a passive beamformer and/or by increasing the order of a passive beamformer such as a Butler matrix. The Butler matrix is a passive device that forms, in conjunction with an antenna array, communication beams using signal combiners, signal splitters and signal phase shifters. A Butler matrix includes a first side with multiple antenna ports and a second side with multiple transmit or receive signal processor ports (TRX). The number of antennas and TRX ports indicates the order of the Butler matrix. The system provides a signal selection method for switching the processing among the TRX ports of the matrix. The method includes signal quality evaluation in order to determine at least one signal accessible at one or more TRX ports.
PCT patent application PCT/EP 2006/011430, not yet published at the time this application is filed, discloses a switched beam antenna that employs a Weighted Radio Frequency (WRF) combining technique. The basic idea behind the WRF solution is to select the two beams providing the highest signal quality and to combine the corresponding signals at radiofrequency by means of suitable weights. The combination of the signals received from two beams improves the value of a given indicator of the signal quality, as for example the signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR) at the receiver, and thus the coverage range and the achievable throughput with respect to a conventional switched beam antenna.
The Applicant has observed that a solution as disclosed in the last document cited above solves a number of problems inherent in those solutions exploiting multiple RF processing chains for demodulating signals received by multiple antenna elements.
As indicated, when the procedure for the beam selection is periodically repeated, a WLAN RF transceiver equipped with a SB antenna will be continuously switched from one beam to another. Instead of shaping the radiation pattern of an array of omnidirectional antennas with suitable combining weights introduced at base band (BB) level, SB antenna systems may select the outputs of the multiple directional antennas in such a way as to form finely sectorized (directional) beams with higher spatial selectivity than that achieved with an array of omnidirectional antenna elements with BB combining techniques.
The large overall gain values obtained, on the receiving side, with SB antenna systems may, though, become critical when the same antenna configuration is used in a WLAN client or access point on the transmitting side, due to the aforementioned EIRP limitations. Such systems are typically aimed to increase the range, neglecting eventual limitations due to regional power limitation regulations. Thus a possible reduction of the transmitted power is eventually introduced, leading to a loss of part of the overall performance enhancement.
One possible solution consists in employing the SB antenna system described in the last document cited in the foregoing, which is able to enhance the overall coverage range, fulfilling the regional regulations concerning limitations on the power emissions, with a smaller reduction of the transmitted power compared to the case of a conventional SB antenna. In particular, the SB antenna architecture described in the last document cited in the foregoing can be exploited by a WLAN client both in the downlink direction (i.e. the Access Point is transmitting and the WLAN client is receiving) and in the more challenging—due to the EIRP limitations—uplink direction (i.e. the WLAN client is transmitting and the Access Point is receiving).
While those solutions based on antenna systems with either selectable directional elements, mechanically or electronically controlled phased arrays and fixed beamforming (based, for example, on the exploitation of a Butler matrix) are thus able to shape a configurable radiation pattern in a certain direction, the solution described in the last document cited in the foregoing is based on a multiple directional antenna system realized with a certain number of directional antennas which are deployed in such a way that all the possible Directions of Arrival (DOAs) of the received signal are covered.
In particular, in contrast with other architectures, the architecture described in the last document cited in the foregoing is based on the exploitation of a suitable recombination and weighting technique, applied at RF, of the selected signals which are co-phased individually and summed together at RF level.
The applicant has observed that a problem related with prior art solutions is the measure of the received signal quality on beams different from that selected for the reception of the user data (which can be briefly referred to as “alternative beams”) and the simultaneous reception of the user data from the selected beam. As the periodical measure of the signal quality on the alternative beams requires a significant time, it can cause the loss of several data packets that had to be received from the selected beam.
While these problems can be solved in a fully satisfactory manner by means of the SB antenna architecture with weighted radiofrequency combining (WRF) described in the last document cited in the foregoing, the need is still felt for an improved arrangement for the measure of the signal quality and beam selection applicable in a radio modem that uses the WRF technique.
Additionally, in a conventional switched beam antenna a single RF receiver is used to demodulate the signal received by the beam with the best value of a given indicator of the signal quality, as for example the signal to interference plus noise ratio (SINR).
The Applicant has observed that one problem related with such architecture is the measure of the received signal quality on the different beams and the simultaneous reception of the user data. As the periodical measure of the signal quality on the different beams requires a significant time, it can cause the loss of several data packets. The packet loss turns into a degradation of the QoS perceived by the user and, in case of real time services, in a temporary service interruption.
The object of the invention is thus to provide a fully satisfactory response to the need outlined above, especially in connection with the possible measure of the received signal quality on the different beams and the simultaneous reception of the user data.
According to the present invention, that object is achieved by means of a method having the features set forth in the claims that follow. The invention also relates to a corresponding system, to be possibly included in a WLAN device. The claims are an integral part of the disclosure of the invention provided herein.
An embodiment of the invention is thus a method of processing an RF signal in a radio communication system, said signal being received by a plurality of antenna elements, including the steps of:
wherein said sub-set of received RF signals is selected by:
An embodiment of the invention allows the continuous measurement of the received signal quality on the different beams.
In an embodiment, the measurement can be performed almost simultaneously with the reception of user data, by using a single RF chain, so that the received signal quality on some of the alternative beams can be measured continuously during the reception of the user data from the selected beam, with the addition of a small number of periodical measures of the signal quality on other alternative beams without simultaneous reception of the user data, without any service interruption or packet loss.
In an embodiment, a certain number of measurements on some alternative beams can be performed simultaneously with the reception of user data, by using a single RF chain and without any service interruption or packet loss, while a small number of measurements on other alternative beams can be periodically performed during the reception of the user data with a reduced impact on the quality of the received service.
An embodiment of the invention results in a fast tracking of the channel variations that turns into an improved QoS perceived by the user, particularly evident in case of real time services (e.g. audio/video).
Further features and advantages of the present invention will be made clearer by the following detailed description of some examples thereof, provided purely by way of example and without restrictive intent. The detailed description will refer to the following figures, in which:
With reference to
An exemplary field of application of the exemplary systems described herein is in a WLAN (Wireless LAN) transceiver compliant with the IEEE 802.11a/b/g or HIPERLAN/2 standards. However, the exemplary systems described herein can be employed also in a transceiver compliant with other wireless communication standards, such for example the UMTS/HSDPA (High Speed Downlink Packet Access) standard.
One issue in the deployment of WLAN networks is the limited coverage range due to the stringent regulatory requirements in terms of maximum EIRP (Equivalent Isotropic Radiated Power). The maximum EIRP of WLAN equipments (20 dBm in Europe) limits the coverage range especially in home environments due to the presence of several obstacles such as walls and furniture.
The adoption of advanced antenna solutions such as switched beam (SB) antennas palliates such a limitation. A SB antenna uses a set of N directional antennas A1, . . . , AN that cover all the possible directions of arrival of the incoming signals. A switched beam antenna architecture as illustrated in
QS=f(RSSI, PER, T, TM)
In the following the assumption will be made that the higher the value of QS, the higher the quality of the received signal at application level.
Those skilled in the art will appreciate that other quality indicators may be used to calculate an alternative quality function. The function QS may thus be used as a Radio Performance Indicator (RPI) to select the beams (i.e. the RF channels) and the RF phase shift weights to be applied. Other types of Radio Performance Indicators (RPI) may be used within the framework of the arrangement described herein. It will however be appreciated that, while being representative of the quality of the respective RF signal, such radio performance indicators as e.g. the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), Packet Error Rate (PER), Signal to Interference-plus-Noise ratio (SINR), MAC throughput (T) and employed transmission mode (TM), or any combination of the aforementioned performance indicators will be non-RF, i.e. Intermediate Frequency (IF) or BaseBand (BB) indicators.
In particular the RSSI is a measure of the received signal power that includes the sum of useful signal, thermal noise and co-channel interference. In the presence of co-channel interference, the RSSI is not sufficient to completely characterize the signal quality. For this reason the quality function QS also exploits the Packet Error Rate (PER), the throughput (T) and the transmission modes (TM) measures that provide a better indication of the actual signal quality QS in the presence of co-channel interference. For a IEEE 802.11 WLAN system the transmission mode corresponds to a particular transmission scheme, characterized by a particular modulation scheme (QPSK, 16 QAM, 64 QAM for example) and channel encoding rate (1/2, 3/4, 5/6 for example) that determine the maximum data rate at the output of PHY layer (6, 12, 18, 24, 54 Mbps for example). Similarly for a UMTS system the transmission mode corresponds to a particular value of transport format (TF) that determines the maximum data rate at the output of PHY layer (12.2, 64, 128, 384 kbps for example) while for the HSPDA system the transmission mode corresponds to a particular value of the channel quality indicator (CQI) that determines the maximum data rate at the output of PHY layer (325, 631, 871, 1291, 1800 kbps for example).
As indicated, a measure of the signal quality can be obtained at the BB and MAC levels by the WLAN chipset. A suitable software driver extracts from the WLAN chipset one (or a combination) of the aforementioned measurements and provides a software procedure, that typically runs on the microprocessor of the WLAN client or on the application processor of the device the WLAN modem is connected to, with these measurements that are the basis for the selection of a particular beam of the multiple directional antenna system. The software procedure, based on the measurement results provided by the WLAN chipset, selects a particular beam through a suitable peripheral (parallel interface, serial interface, GPIO interface) of the processor where the procedure that drives the RF switching network is executed.
Several arrangements of the antenna subsystem can be conceived. An example is shown in
Signals r1, . . . , rN from antennas A1, . . . , AN are fed to a RF switching network 6 that allows the selection, by means of selection signal S, of a sub-set of signals, in particular two (or more than two) strongest beams providing the signals ri and rj that maximize a given radio performance indicator (RPI), as explained in detail hereinafter.
This decision is made in block 16 at base-band (BB) level by measuring one or more radio performance indicator (RPI) provided by a modem receiver 10, such as for example the Received Signal Strength Indicator (RSSI), the throughput or the Packet Error Rate (PER). A suitable recombination technique, applied at RF level, is then performed on the signals ri, rj selected by the switching network. The recombined signal is then sent to a single RF processing chain 12 and demodulated through a conventional modem 14 which carries out the BB and MAC receiving operations.
The recombination technique, referenced hereinafter as Weighted Radio Frequency (WRF) combining, operates as follows. The two (or in general the sub-set) selected signals ri and rj are first co-phased, in block 18, by means of a multiplication operation for appropriate complex-valued weights, referenced globally by signal W in
In fact, as the signal propagation takes place generally through multiple
Directions of Arrival (DOAs), such recombination technique, performed at RF level, gives a reduction of fading and produces an output signal with a better quality, even when none of the individual signals of the different DOAs are themselves acceptable. This is obtained by weighting the signals from different directions of arrival (two in the embodiment described herein but in general a subset of all directions) according to an appropriate complex value, co-phasing them individually and finally summing them together. The information will hence be gathered from the selected directions of arrival, each of which gives its own weighted contribution to the output signal.
The complex-valued weights W and the selection of the sub-set of beams, to be used in the co-phasing operation, are chosen with the goal of obtaining a radio performance indicator RPI comprised within a predetermined range, e.g. maximizing a particular indicator, or a combination of different indicators, such as the RSSI or the throughput, or by minimizing the PER of the combined signal.
With particular reference to a first embodiment, shown in
Specifically, this might be achieved by passing the signal ri directly to the combiner 8 over a line 182, and multiplying the signal rj with the weight wj in a RF multiplier 184.
The two signals are then recombined in block 8 and sent to the single RF processing chain 12 and demodulated through the modem 14 which carries out the BB and MAC receiving operations, as shown in
An embodiment of the beam selection technique will be detailed in the following.
As a result of the beam selection step, an optimal beam selection signal S and weight(s) W can be obtained e.g. from decision block 16.
In an embodiment, the complex-valued weights with unitary modulus can be introduced in a quantized form in order to use only a limited set of values. In particular, in order to define a quantization step providing a good trade-off between performance and complexity, the entire angle of 360° might be divided in a certain number L of quantized angular values corresponding to multiples of a certain elementary angle resolution with a value a=360°/L. It is evident that the L quantized angular values can be represented, with a binary notation, on a certain number of bits equal to log2(L).
This elementary angle resolution a represents the discrete step to be applied at RF level in order to co-phase one of the selected signals(two signals will be considered herein, even though any plural number can be notionally used). In the case of unitary modulus complex-valued weight w, an optimal number L of quantized angular values introducing the phase shift for the co-phasing operation can be chosen, for example, by optimizing the performance, in terms of PER, computed on the combined signal.
The discrete phase shift step, to be applied at RF level in order to co-phase one of the two selected signals, can be obtained, for example, by exploiting a suitable RF co-phasing network that, for example, can be implemented according to the scheme shown in
The implementation of the RF co-phasing network, shown in
wi=exp(−j·2·p·diλ) for i=0, . . . , L−1 (1)
where λ is the wavelength of the signal carrier.
From equation (1) it follows that, in order to obtain quantized phase shift values corresponding to multiples of a certain elementary angle resolution a=360°/L so that wi=exp(−j·φi) with φi=360°/L·i, and i=0,1, . . . , L−1, values di of delay given by the following equation are employed:
di=λ/L·i for i=0, . . . , L−1 (2)
The antenna architecture as described herein, while providing a performance improvement, advantageously requires only one RF processing chain, thus reducing the required complexity and related costs. Moreover, as no substantial modifications are required within the modem receiver 10, this solution can be applied on existing WLAN clients as an add-on device, reducing the required costs in the related deployment.
With reference to a second embodiment, shown in
Specifically, this might be achieved by multiplying the signal ri with the weight wi in a first RF multiplier 186 and the signal rj with the weight wj in a second RF multiplier 188.
In this case the signal at the output of the co-phasing network 18b and combining network 8 can be expressed as follows
r=ri·wi+rj·wj
where the weighting factors can be expressed as complex phase shift weights
wi=exp(ja) wj32 exp(jβ)
and the signals at the output of the RF switching network can be expressed considering, for simplicity, only the phase term
ri=exp(jΘ1) ri=exp(jΘ2)
The combined signal is then expressed as follows
r=exp(jΘ1+a)+exp(jΘ2+β)
In order to coherently combine the two signals the following condition is fulfilled
Θ1+a=Θ2+β=>Θ1−Θ2=a−β
As the phases of the two selected signals Θ1 and Θ2 are independent, it follows that the difference between the two phase weights a and β covers all the possible angles between 0° and 360·(L−1)/L
Several choices are possible for the phase weights a and β. For example if L=4, it is possible to use the following two phase sets
a={0°, 180°} β={0°, 90°}
The difference between a and β takes a set of values that covers all the possible angles between 0° and 360·(L−1)/L
a−β={0°,90°,180°,−90°}={0°,90°,180°,270°}
An advantage of the configuration shown in
The configuration in
It will be appreciated that, for the purposes of this description, a unitary real coefficient wij with φi,j equal to zero will in any case be considered as a particular case for a phase shift weight.
In the exemplary embodiments as shown in
Under the hypothesis of ideal channel reciprocity, i.e. the uplink transmission channel is equivalent to the downlink transmission channel, when using a Switched Beam WLAN client with a single beam for transmission and a single beam for reception, the uplink propagation path and the downlink propagation path can be assumed to have similar characteristics if the same beam is used for the reception and transmission links. Thus the gain GDL, with respect to a single antenna WLAN client, achieved during the downlink reception when the WLAN client is equipped with a reference Switched Beam antenna architecture can be assumed true also when the same WLAN client is used as a transmitter in the uplink direction, gain GUL, and the transmission occurs from the beam that has been previously selected during the downlink reception.
During the transmission of the WLAN client in the uplink direction, the specified EIRP maximum emission conditions can not be fulfilled. Thus a reduction of the transmitted power by a factor equal to Pred is introduced. The reduction of the transmitted power affects the gain on the uplink direction. The above considerations lead to the following equations:
GDL=GdB (3)
GUL=GDL−Pred (4)
Pred=Pclient+Gant−20 dBm (5)
where Gant is the gain of the single directional antenna employed and Pclient is the transmission power of the WLAN client.
A typical value for Pclient is between 16 and 18 dBm and Gant values vary between 6 dB and 10 dB. It is evident that these values lead to a power emission, given by Pclient+Gant, that clearly exceeds the 20 dBm limit.
For instance, for a value of Gant equal to 8 dB and a value of Pclient equal to 17 dBm, in the absence of cables loss, the EIRP transmitted by the WLAN client is equal to 25 dBm that exceeds the 20 dBm limit. In this particular case a power reduction Pred equal to 5 dB has to be introduced.
According to equation (4) it is possible to conclude that, because of the power reduction Pred, the gain on the uplink direction GUL is correspondingly reduced by a factor equal to 5 dB.
The above considerations are summarized in
It is important to observe that the overall coverage range extension obtained is given by the minimum between the coverage range extension obtained on the downlink and uplink path. Since the downlink and uplink coverage ranges are strictly dependent on the corresponding values of gain GDL and GUL, the overall gain GSB of a reference Switched Beam antenna can be defined with respect to a single antenna transceiver as follows:
GSB=min(GDL, GUL) (6)
Combining equation (6) with equation (4), it is possible to write GSB as:
GSB=GUL=GDL−Pred (7)
As a consequence, when using WLAN clients equipped with a reference Switched Beam antenna architecture, the limiting link in terms of coverage is the uplink direction because of the reduction of the transmission power required in order to satisfy emission limitations.
In existing WLAN configurations, the clients typically use a single omni-directional antenna in the transmission towards the access point. Transmit diversity techniques can, instead, be used in the transmission path from the access point to the client (downlink). In these systems omni-directional antennas are used in order not to exceed the power emission limitations.
The switched beam antenna architecture according to the present invention, with WRF combining and single RF processing chain, described above with reference to
The configuration shown in
In particular, after the conventional BB and MAC modem 34 and the single RF processing chain 32, the signal to be transmitted is sent to a splitter 36 that divides it into two (or in general a plurality of) separate signals with the same power level, that is equal, in dBm, to Pclient−3 dB. Thanks to the hypothesis of channel reciprocity, one of the two signals is digitally weighted exploiting the complex-valued weight w evaluated during the downlink reception, in phasing block 38. This enables the signals reaching the access point to be coherently recombined at the receiver end, leading to performance enhancement.
In any case the main benefit of this solution resides in the fact that the power transmitted from each of the two antennas of the antenna architecture according to the present invention is equal to half of the power transmitted by the single antenna of a reference Switched Beam antenna. This means that, in order to be compliant with the EIRP limitation, the power transmitted by each of the two antennas is reduced by the following quantity
Pred=Pclient−3 dB+Gant−20 dBm (8)
If the power reduction to be employed in the reference SB antenna, defined in equation (4), is compared with the power reduction to be employed in the SB antenna matter of the present invention defined in equation (8), it is possible to observe that, in the latter system, thanks to the fact that, for the transmission two directional antennas fed with half of the overall transmission power of the client are employed, the value of the power reduction is 3 dB smaller than the corresponding value to be employed in the former system. This is obtained thanks to the hypothesis that the overall power in each point of the azimuth plane does not overcome the maximum emission power of the single radiation element of the antenna system that has been dimensioned in order to satisfy the power emission limitations.
Since the gain in the uplink direction GUL is related to the gain in the downlink direction GDL by equation (4) it is possible to observe that a smaller reduction of the transmission power corresponds to a higher value of the uplink gain GUL and, in turn, to a larger value of the overall antenna gain GSB as defined in equation (7).
Therefore, the switched beam antenna architecture as described herein, thanks to the higher gain on the downlink direction GDL and to the larger power transmitted by each of the two directional antennas, has better performance, in terms of overall antenna gain GSB and therefore in terms of coverage range extension, with respect to a reference Switched Beam antenna.
In case the second version of the RF phasing circuit 18, the circuit of
An embodiment of the procedure for beam selection will now be described in detail.
As indicated, the procedure for the beam selection is preferably periodically repeated in order to track the variations of the propagation channel so that a WLAN RF transceiver equipped with a SB antenna is continuously switched from one beam to another. The receiver sequentially selects the signals received at the different antennas A1, . . . , AN (e.g. the beams) and measures the signal quality. If the receiver is in idle state these measures can be performed by exploiting a beacon channel transmitted by the access point (AP). Comparing the signal quality measured over the various beams the receiver selects the antenna with the highest signal quality, which is used for data reception or transmission when the receiver switches from the idle state to the connected state.
In order to track the channel variations, the measure of the signal quality should be updated during the data transmission. The selection of the best antenna may require a significant time, in the order of several milliseconds (ms), during which many data packets may be lost. The quality of service (QoS) perceived by the user may then be degraded and this impairment may be particularly critical for real time services such as video and audio services.
The SB antenna architecture, described in the foregoing, reduces the previous impairment and also improves the conventional switched beam antenna architecture of
The RF signals ri and rj, received from the two beams with the highest signal quality, are selected and combined at radiofrequency (RF) level by means of suitable weights wi and wj.
Those of skill in the art will appreciate that while two beams are considered throughout the rest of this description for the sake of simplicity, the arrangement disclosed can be notionally applied to any plural number of beams (i.e. RF signals) to be selected and then co-phase and combined.
The weights wi and wj are determined in order to coherently combine (e.g. with the same phase) the two signals ri and rj. The beam selection and the determination of the optimal combining weights is still based on the quality function QS that depends on PHY and MAC layer parameters such as received signal strength (RSSI), Packet Error Rate (PER), MAC throughput (T) and employed transmission mode (TM).
The weighting operation, shown schematically in
for i=0, . . . , L−1, where L is the number of values used to quantize all the possible phase shifts in the range between 0 and 360(L−1)/L degrees. After the weighting operation the two signals are combined by means of an RF combining unit and provided to the RF receiver.
The arrangements described in the following provide the possibility of measuring the signal quality and the corresponding beam selection operation that allows the simultaneous reception of the user data. The method allows a faster track of the channel variations without any service interruption that instead affects the conventional SB antenna architecture.
By way of example, the beam selection method will be described in the following for a SB antenna with WRF combining having N=8 directional antennas. Such a antenna configuration with its radiation pattern is shown in
From an implementation point of view, different possible solutions can be employed to realize the switching network. In the following, some reference schemes will presented for illustrative purposes.
The first switching network scheme, shown in
The second switching network scheme, shown in
The third switching network scheme, shown in
In any case, in realistic propagation scenarios where the Directions of Arrival (DOAs) of the two strongest received signals are angularly distributed in a uniform way, the suboptimal switching network shown in
In the following will be described the procedures for measuring the signal quality and determining the optimal beams and weighting factor in the particular case of the SB antenna with Weighted Radio Frequency (WRF) combining shown in
The procedure for determining the configuration of beams and weighting coefficients that currently is the optimal one, i.e. that maximizes a certain quality function QS measured by the BB and MAC modules of the receiver, can be divided in two different sub-procedures to be followed respectively in the case of idle mode state or active mode state. In particular a WLAN client or mobile station (STA) is in idle mode state immediately after being switched on or when it is not used for exchanging data with the access point (AP). In a similar way a WLAN STA is in active mode state when a radio link is established for the exchange of data with the AP. The main difference between the two procedures lies in the fact that, during the active mode state, the WLAN STA is exchanging data with the AP and therefore the periodic measurements of the received signal quality on beams different from those selected for the reception of the user data (alternative beams) have to be performed during the reception of the user data from the selected beams.
It is possible to observe that when two adjacent beams (Ai,Bj) of the SB antenna are selected, depending on the phase value fk of the complex coefficient wk=exp(jfk) it is possible to obtain an equivalent radiation pattern, characterized by the parameters (Ai,Bj) and fk with a better angular resolution than the radiation pattern of the different beams (A1,A2,A3,A4) and (B1,B2,B3,B4). For every equivalent radiation pattern characterized by the parameters (Ai,Bj) and fk it is possible to identify a Direction of Arrival (DOA) corresponding to the direction of the maximum value of the radiation pattern itself.
The correspondence between the parameters (Ai,Bj), fk and the DOA is shown in table 1. The table shows also that the 24 set of parameters corresponding to the 24 lines of the table provide an antenna configuration able to completely scan the azimuth plane with a resolution of approximately 15°.
In order to define particular values of the parameters (Ai,Bj), fk generating radiation patterns being equivalent to those obtained with the single beams Ai or Bj, three cases denoted in the following as Case 1, Case 2 and Case 3 might be considered:
Case 1: In this first case the equivalent radiation pattern of a single beam Ai or Bj with i=1,2,3,4 and j=1,2,3,4 can be obtained as the average value of the two radiation patterns obtained with the parameters indicated in the corresponding 2 lines of table 2. The average value has to be intended in the following way: the quality function QS obtained in correspondence of the equivalent radiation pattern of a single beam Ai or Bj can be computed as the average of the quality functions QS1 and QS2 measured in correspondence of the parameters indicated in the corresponding 2 lines of table 2.
Case 2: In this second case the equivalent radiation pattern of a single beam Ai or Bj with i=1,2,3,4 and j=1,2,3,4 can be obtained with the parameters indicated in table 3.
Case 3: In this third case the equivalent radiation pattern of a single beam Ai or Bj with i=1,2,3,4 and j=1,2,3,4 can be obtained with the parameters indicated in table 4.
According to one of the aforementioned three cases it is therefore possible to drive the SB antenna system with possible sets of parameters (Ai,Bj), fk where each set of parameters generates a radiation pattern equivalent to that of a particular beam Ai or Bj. In this way it is therefore possible to associate a particular value of the quality function QS to every single beam Ai or Bj with i=1,2,3,4 and j=1,2,3,4 of the antenna system. In the following, the value of quality function QS associated to the beam Ai will be denoted as QS(Ai) and the value of the quality function associated to the beam Bj as QS(Bj).
In an arrangement, the 8 values of the quality function QS for every beam of the SB antenna system are calculated, which generates the corresponding 8 quality functions
QS(A1), QS(A2), QS(A3), QS(A4)
QS(B1), QS(B2), QS(B3), QS(B4)
These 8 quality functions associated to the 8 beams of the SB antenna system are then preferably divided in two subsets corresponding respectively to the beams Aiε{A1,A2,A3,A4} and Bjε{B1,B2,B3,B4}. The quality functions belonging to these different subsets are then sorted in decreasing order obtaining
QS(AMAX), QS(AMAX-1), QS(AMAX-2), QS(AMAX-3)
QS(BMAX), QS(BMAX-1), QS(BMAX-2), QS(BMAX-3)
Moreover the following quantities may be defined
ΔA1=QS(AMAX)−QS(AMAX-1)
ΔA2=QS(AMAX)−QS(AMAX-2)
ΔB1=QS(BMAX)−QS(BMAX-1)
ΔB2=QS(BMAX)−QS(BMAX-2)
In the following a numerical example will be provided in order to explain the previously described method. For example the measures of the quality function QS of the 8 beams of the SB antenna system, employing the procedure previously described, for example in the particular case of the correspondence between the parameters (Ai,Bj), fk and the equivalent beams described in table 4 (i.e. Case 3), provide the following quality functions:
QS(A1)=2, QS(A2)=18, QS(A3)=16, QS(A4)=13
QS(B1)=10, QS(B2)=18, QS(B3)=8, QS(B4)=15
Then the 2 subsets of quality functions corresponding respectively to the beams Aiε{A1,A2,A3,A4} and Bjε{B1,B2,B3,B4} are sorted
QS(A2)=18, QS(A3)=16, QS(A4)=13, QS(A1)=2
QS(B2)=18, QS(B4)=15, QS(B1)=10, QS(B3)=8
so that
AMAX=A2, AMAX-1=A3, AMAX-2=A4, AMAX-3=A1
BMAX=B2, BMAX-1=B4, BMAX-2=B1, BMAX-3=B3
and
ΔA1=2, ΔA2=5, ΔB1=3, ΔB2=8
With the information about the quality functions
QS(AMAX), QS(AMAX-1), QS(AMAX-2), QS(AMAX-3)
QS(BMAX), QS(BMAX-1), QS(BMAX-2), QS(BMAX-3)
and the quantities ΔA1, ΔA2, ΔB1, ΔB2 it is possible to select the optimal beams Aopt and Bopt generating the associated optimal signals riopt and rjopt according to the method described with respect to the flowcharts shown in
In particular the method can be conceptually divided in 2 phases. In the first phase, according to the flowchart described in
Specifically, after a start step 10002, the first beam is selected to AMAX at step 10014 if the condition QS(AMAX)>QS(BMAX) denoted 10004 is true. On the contrary, if the further condition QS(AMAX)<QS(BMAX) denoted 10006 is true, the first selected beam is set to BMAX at step 10016.
In the particular case of QS(AMAX)=QS(BMAX) (i.e. neither the condition 10004 nor the condition 10006 is satisfied), the quantities ΔA1 and ΔB1 are compared at step 10008. Specifically, the beam BMAX is selected at step 10018 if the difference of the quality functions relative to the beams BMAX and BMAX-1 is larger than the difference of the quality functions relative to the beams AMAX and AMAX-1. Else, the beam 1 is selected to AMAX at step 10010. Specifically, condition 10008 might verify if ΔB1 is greater than ΔA1.
After the selection of beam 1 the procedure is terminated for all conditions at step 10012.
The last condition 10008 means that the first selected beam has a quality function with the largest difference from the quality function of the second beam in the same subset. In this way the candidates for the second selected beam (denoted in the following as beam 2) belong to the different subset with respect to that of the beam 1 and present values of the quality function QS with a smaller dispersion with respect to those of the first subset. This condition ensures a good selection of the optimal beams Aopt and Bopt also in the particular case of QS(AMAX)=QS(BMAX).
Also the second phase, according to the flowchart shown in
In the following, it will be supposed that the beam 1 is equal to BMAX and the flow chart on the right hand side of
If AMAX is adjacent to BMAX (i.e. positive outcome of condition 11006) then AMAX is not immediately selected as beam 2, because the presence of a further beam of the subset A with a good value of the quality function QS and a higher angular distance from the beam 1 (BMAX in the example) should be investigated.
Therefore, a further condition is sought for introducing a higher level of space diversity. In a preferred embodiment, a condition 11008 verifies if the quality function of the beam AMAX-1 is smaller than the quality function of the beam AMAX minus a certain amount, denoted as Threshold 1, and if true the beam 2 is set equal to AMAX at step 11020, because the quality function of the beam AMAX-1 is not sufficiently high. Specifically, condition 11008 might verify if ΔA1 is greater than Threshold 1.
On the contrary, if the quality function of the beam AMAX-1 has a difference from the quality function of the beam AMAX, which is smaller than the quantity Threshold 1 verified by condition 11008 and the beam AMAX-1 is not adjacent to BMAX (i.e. negative outcome of a condition 11010) then the beam 2 is set equal to AMAX-1 at step 11022 in order to increase the level of space diversity.
If the outcome of the condition 11010 is positive (i.e. AMAX-1 is adjacent to BMAX), the beam AMAX-2 is considered as a possible candidate for the beam 2. Specifically, if the quality function of the beam AMAX-2 has a difference from the quality function of the beam AMAX smaller then the quantity Threshold 2 then the beam 2 is set equal to AMAX-2 at step 11024. Specifically, condition 11012 might verify if ΔA2 is greater than Threshold 2.
In the absence of candidates with a good value of the quality function QS and a higher angular distance from the beam 1, the beam 2 is set equal to AMAX at step 11014.
The left hand side of the flowchart shown in
In order to better clarify the behavior of the proposed method, the previous numerical example will be considered and the thresholds will be set to Threshold 1=Threshold 2=6.
During the first phase, since QS(AMAX)=QS(BMAX) (i.e. conditions 10004 and 10006 are false), the quantities ΔA1 and ΔB1 are computed. Moreover, the outcome of condition 10008 is true, because ΔB1=3>ΔA1=2, and consequently the beam 1 is set to BMAX at step 10018.
During the second phase, at condition 11004 the right hand side of the flowchart of
In this way, the two optimal beams would be BMAX=B2 and AMAX-2=A4, obtaining good levels of quality function for both beams, because QS(B2)=18 and QS(A4)=13 and, at the same time, a good amount of angular diversity.
When the optimal beams Aopt and Bopt, generating the associated optimal signals riopt and rjopt, have been selected the weight wk=exp(jφk) is selected.
In an embodiment, this procedure is performed by selecting the optimal beams Aopt and Bopt, feeding the RF combining unit with the corresponding two optimal signals riopt and rjopt, and computing 4 values of the quality function QS(riopt,rjopt,wk) in correspondence of the 4 different values of the weight wk=exp(jφk) for φk={0°,90°,180°,270°} so to obtain:
QS1=QS(riopt,rjopt,w1)=exp(j·0°)
QS2=QS(riopt,rjopt,w2)=exp(j·90°)
QS3=QS(riopt,rjopt,w3)=exp(j·180°)
QS4=QS(riopt,rjopt,w4)=exp(j·270°)
Finally, the largest of the 4 quality functions is selected and the corresponding value of the weight wk is set equal to wopt so that
QS,max=QS(riopt,rjopt,wopt)=max{QS1,QS2,QS3,QS4}
Therefore, the configuration of beams Aopt and Bopt (generating the associated optimal signals riopt and rjopt) and weight wopt have been selected, which provide a high value QSmax of the quality function QS(ri,rj,wk) with a reduced number of measures of the quality function. Specifically, the number of measures would be equal to 26 for the procedure of Case 1 and to 12 for the procedures of Case 2 and Case 3. By way of contrast an exhaustive search procedure would require 64 measures of the quality function.
In an embodiment, this procedure is executed the first time after the WLAN STA is switched on and then it is periodically repeated in order to track possible variations of the propagation scenario. Therefore all the aforementioned measures of the quality function QS have to be periodically repeated.
In certain embodiments, the dependence of the subsequent measures of the quality function QS from the particular time instant at which they are taken is take into consideration.
The BB and MAC modules of the WLAN STA, every Tm seconds, perform 2 different measures: the first measure is the quality function QS(riopt,rjopt,wopt,k) obtained in correspondence of the selected configuration of beams and weight that is currently the optimal one and in the following denoted as QS(opt,k), while the second measure is the quality function QS(Ai,k) obtained in correspondence of the configuration of beams and weight that generates an equivalent radiation pattern similar to that of the beam Ai or, alternatively, the quality function QS(Bi,k), obtained in correspondence of the configuration of beams and weight that generates an equivalent radiation pattern similar to that of the beam Bi.
Moreover, during the basic measurement interval with length Tm seconds, the first Tm−TΔ seconds are used for measuring the quality function QS(opt,k) while the last TΔ seconds are used for measuring the quality function QS(Ai,k) or, alternatively, the quality function QS(Bi,k). Such measure of the quality functions might e.g. be performed on the basis of the incoming packets transmitted by the AP.
In an embodiment, the WLAN STA performs during the idle mode state the measures of the quality function on the basis of the packets received from the beacon channel while during the active mode state the WLAN STA performs the measures of the quality function on the basis of the data packets transmitted by the AP to that particular WLAN STA.
Therefore, the measure of the quality function QS(opt,k), performed in correspondence of the selected configuration of beams and weight that is currently the optimal one, does not introduce any impact on the reception of the user data while the measures of the quality functions QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k), performed in correspondence of the configurations of beams and weight that generate equivalent radiation patterns similar to those of the beam Ai or Bi, can introduce a certain impact on the reception of the user data.
In any case, the periodic measure of the quality functions QS(Ai,k) and QS(Bi,k) for i=1,2,3,4 is a basis for the periodic selection of the optimal beams and weight, according to the method described with respect to
In order to reduce as much as possible the impact on the reception of the user data introduced by the periodic measures of the quality functions QS(Ai,k) and QS(Bi,k) the following four strategies might be considered:
Strategy 1: When a WLAN STA is in active mode state, within the k-th basic measurement interval, the period of time Tm−TΔ used for the measurement of the quality function QS(opt,k) and the simultaneous reception of the user data is much larger than the period of time TΔ used for the measurement of the quality functions QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k). In this way only a small number of received packets (in the best case only 1 packet) are employed for the measurement of the quality functions QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k) limiting as much as possible the impact on the reception of the user data.
Strategy 2: When a WLAN STA is in idle mode state, within the k-th basic measurement interval, the period of time Tm−TΔ used for the measurement of the quality function QS(opt,k) can be made comparable to the period of time TΔ used for the measurement of the quality functions QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k). For this reason in idle mode state the length of the period Tm is smaller than the corresponding value employed during the active mode state. In fact, during the idle mode state, the WLAN STA does not need to continuously receive user data from the AP and therefore it can use approximately the same time period for measuring the quality functions QS(opt,k) and QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k). Moreover, being the time period Tm smaller compared to the value employed during the active mode state, the estimation of the 8 values QS(Ai,k) and QS(Bi,k) for i=1,2,3,4 can be faster or more reliable.
Strategy 3: When a WLAN STA is in active mode state, in order to further reduce the impact on the reception of the user data introduced by the measurement of the 8 quality functions QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k) for i=1,2,3,4, it is possible to proceed in the following way. For example, when a particular configuration of beams and weight generating an equivalent radiation pattern similar to that of the beam A1 is employed, the received signal might present contributions generated also by the signals with a Direction of Arrival (DOA) corresponding to the adjacent beams B1 and B4 even if they are slightly attenuated with respect to the signal received from the DOA of the beam A1. This effect is mainly due to the equivalent radiation pattern of the beam A1 that, being not ideal, collects a certain amount of energy from the DOA of the neighboring beams B1 and B4. It is therefore possible to exploit this effect for performing measurements of the quality functions QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k) for the beams that are adjacent to the optimal beams Aopt and Bopt without affecting the reception of the user data.
In order to better clarify this concept, the previous example might be used to explain the method for the selection of the optimal configuration of beams and weight. According to the aforementioned example, after the determination of the two optimal beams Aopt and Bopt and the optimal weight factor wopt maximizing the quality function QS,max, Aopt=A4 and Bopt=B2 have been obtained. Based on the previous observation it is therefore possible to measure, during subsequent basic measurement intervals, the quality functions of the beams A2 and A3 that are adjacent to B2 without any impact on the reception of the user data. This measurements will be denoted as QS(A2,k), QS(A3,k+1) in the following. In a similar way, during subsequent basic measurement intervals, the quality functions of the beams B3 and B4 that are adjacent to A4 can be measured with minimum impact on the reception of the user data. This measurements will be denoted as QS(B3,k+2), QS(B4,k+3) in the following. Moreover it is evident that the quality functions corresponding to the beams that are currently selected as optimal Aopt=A4 and Bopt=B2 can be implicitly measured without any impact on the reception of the user data. These further measurements will be denoted as QS(A4,k+4), QS(B2,k+5) in the following.
Therefore, in the particular considered example, only the measurements of the quality functions QS(A1,k+6) and QS(B1,k+7), corresponding to the beams A1 and B1 that are not adjacent to the optimal beams A4 and B2, require the selection of particular combinations of beams and weights that, in principle, can introduce a certain impact on the reception of the user data.
Strategy 4: When a WLAN STA is in active mode state, exploiting the fact that the measures of the quality functions of the beams that are adjacent to Aopt and Bopt, together with the measures of the quality functions relative to the optimal beams Aopt and Bopt itself, do not introduce an impact on the reception of the user data, it is possible to organize the measures of the quality functions QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k) for i=1,2,3,4 in a suitable way for maximizing the time distance between subsequent quality function measurements that can potentially introduce an impact on the reception of the user data.
By using the data of the aforementioned example it is possible to organize the measurements of the quality functions QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k) for i=1,2,3,4 during subsequent basic measurements periods in the following way
QS(A1,k), QS(A2,k+1), QS(B2,k+2), QS(A3,k+3),
QS(B1,k+4), QS(B3,k+5), QS(A4,k+6), QS(B4,k+7)
In this way the time distance between the measurements of the quality functions QS(A1,k) and QS(B1,k+4) that may introduce an impact on the reception of the user data is maximized.
By way of reference, table 5 summarizes the meaning of the variables used in the procedures described in the foregoing.
After a start step 12002, in a step 12004 the counter is k is set to 1. In the following step 12006, the quality functions QS(Ai,k) and QS(Bi,k) for i=1,2,3,4 are measured and in step 12008 the optimal configuration of beams and weights, together with the related quality function QS,max are selected.
At step 12010 the k-th basic measurement of the quality functions QS(opt,k)=QS(riopt,rjopt,wopt,k) and one of the cost functions QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k) are performed. In this way the quality function QS(opt,k) of the current optimal configuration of beams and weight is periodically updated as well as the data base keeping the 8 quality functions QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k) for i=1,2,3,4 used as input for the method, described with respect to
A new procedure for the selection of a new configuration of beams and weight is started when the value of the quality function QS(opt,k), measured by the receiver during the k-th basic measurement interval, becomes smaller than the value QS,max, determined during the previous selection of the optimal configuration of beams and weight, by a factor QS update (in this case a new selection is started since the optimal configuration would have a poor quality). This verification is implemented by a condition 12012 which controls if QS(opt,k) is smaller than (QS,max−QS update).
Moreover, a new procedure for the selection of a new configuration is started when the value of the quality function QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k), measured by the receiver during the k-th basic measurement interval, becomes greater than the value QS,max, determined during the previous selection of the optimal configuration of beams and weight, by a factor QS update (in this case a new selection is started since an unused beam of the SB antenna system would have an high quality). This verification is implemented by a condition 12014, which controls if either QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k) is greater than (QS,max+QS update).
Specifically, in both cases (i.e. conditions 12012 and 12014), a new procedure for the selection of a new configuration is started by going back to step 12008.
On the contrary (i.e. negative result of both conditions 12012 and 12014), a new procedure for the selection of a new configuration of beams and weight is started when the counter k of the basic measurement intervals reaches the limit value Kupdate, which is verified by a condition 12016. Specifically, a new procedure is started by resetting the counter k to 1 in step 12018 and going back to step 12008.
On the contrary, a new measurement cycle is started by incrementing the counter k by 1 in a step 12020 and going back to step 12010.
In an embodiment, Kupdate is equal to an integer number multiple of 8, i.e. Kupdate=NACC·8, where NACC is parameter quantifying the number of measures QS(Ai,k0), QS(Ai,k0+8), QS(Ai,k0+16), . . . QS(Ai,k0+8·(NACC−1)) relative to the same beam Ai that eventually can be averaged in order to improve the corresponding reliability. In this way the procedure for selecting the optimal configuration of beams and weight receives as input 8 values
An alternative periodical procedure for tracking the possible time variations of the propagation environment is described in the flow chart of
After a start step 13002, the quality functions QS(Ai,k) and QS(Bi,k) for i=1,2,3,4 are measured in step 13004 and the optimal configuration of beams and weight together with the related quality function QS,max are selected in step 13006.
At step 13008 a new measurement procedure is started (i.e. the counter k is set to 1) and at step 13010 the k-th basic measurement of the quality functions QS(opt,k)=QS(riopt,rjopt,wopt,k) and one of the cost functions QS(Ai,k) or QS(Bi,k) are performed. In this embodiment, the measurements are performed for 8 subsequent basic measurement intervals in order to have at the end four QS(Ai,k) and four QS(Bi,k) updated values.
Such a loop might be implemented by a condition 13012, which verifies if k is equal to 8, and incrementing k by 1 and reactivating step 13010, if the result of the verification was false.
The results are used as input for the method, described with respect to
In the next step 13014, the quality function QS(opt,I) is calculated as an average of the eight QS(opt,k) previously measured and QS(I) is calculated as the maximum of the quality function of the eight beams of the SB antenna system.
A new procedure for the selection of a new configuration of beams and weight is started when the value of the quality function QS(opt,I) becomes smaller than the value QS,max, determined during the previous selection of the optimal configuration of beams and weight, by a factor QS update (in this case a new selection is started since the quality function averaged over 8 basic measurement intervals in correspondence of the optimal configuration of beams and weight has a poor quality). This verification is implemented by a condition 13016 which controls if QS(opt,I) is smaller than (QS,max−QS update).
Moreover, a new procedure for the selection of a new configuration is started when the value of the quality function QS(I) becomes greater than the value QS,max, determined during the previous selection of the optimal configuration of beams and weight, by a factor QS update (in this case a new selection is started since an unused beam of the SB antenna system has an high quality). This verification is implemented by a condition 13018, which controls if QS(I) is greater than (QS,max+QS update).
In this embodiment, a new procedure for the selection of a new configuration is started by going back to step 13006.
Alternatively a new procedure for the selection of a new configuration of beams and weight is started when the counter I of the eight basic measurement intervals reaches the limit value NACC, which is verified by condition 13020, wherein NACC is the parameter quantifying the number of measures QS(Ai,I0), QS(Ai,I0+1), QS(Ai,I0+2), . . . QS(Ai,I0+(NACC−1)) relative to the same beam Ai that eventually can be averaged in order to improve the corresponding reliability. In this way the procedure for selecting the optimal configuration of beams and weight receives as input 8 values
On the contrary, if the outcome of the verification of condition 13020 is false, a new measurement cycle is started by incrementing the counter I by 1 in step 13026 and going back to step 13008.
The application of the switched beam antenna with WRF combining as described herein is not limited to WLAN systems but can be also envisaged for cellular systems as, for example, third generation (3G) mobile communication systems. Examples of possible application are the evolution of the UMTS and CDMA2000 radio interfaces denoted respectively as HSDPA (High Speed Downlink Packet Access) and 1xEV-DO (EVolution, Data-Optimized). These two transmission technologies are optimized for the provision of high speed packet data services in downlink, including mobile office applications, interactive games, download of audio and video contents, etc. The switched beam antenna architecture according to the invention can be easily integrated in an HSDPA or 1xEv-DO modem in order to provide benefits in terms of average and peak throughput with respect to a conventional modem equipped with one omnidirectional antenna.
The benefits of the switched beam antenna as described herein are plural. A first benefit is the reduction of the inter-cell interference obtained through the spatial filtering of the signals transmitted by the interfering cells. By using a directional antenna system it is possible to maximize the signal received from the serving cell and at the same time minimize the interfering signals arriving from the other directions. A reduction of the inter-cell interference corresponds to an increment of the geometry factor G, defined as the ratio between the power of the signal received from the serving cell and the power of the signals received from the interfering cells. The users near to the cell edge typically face a low value of the geometry factor and thus the switched beam antenna can provide significant benefits in terms of throughput.
A second benefit of the switched beam antenna is obtained for users near to the serving base station. For these users the inter-cell interference is minimal but the link performance is degraded by the intra-cell interference caused by the other channels (common and dedicated) transmitted by the serving base station. This self interference is a consequence of the multipath propagation that reduces the orthogonality among the different spreading codes. The utilization of the switched beam antenna reduces the delay spread and consequently increases the orthogonality of the propagation channel. The effect of the switched beam antenna is equivalent to an equalization of the channel frequency response in the spatial domain that reduces the intra-cell interference and thus brings an increment of the data throughput.
It will be appreciated that the procedures just described involve, after a “current” sub-set of received RF signals has been selected for combining into a single RF signal for demodulation, an at least partial repetition of the procedure for selecting the sub-set of RF signals to be used for reception. This at least partial repetition of the selection procedure aims at searching a candidate sub-set of received RF signals to be possibly selected as an alternative to the current sub-set.
The radio performance indicator (RPI) representative of the quality of the RF signals in the current sub-set is monitored and a check is performed at given times in order to verify whether a candidate sub-set of received RF signals exists which is able to provide a radio performance indicator improved (e.g. higher) over the radio performance indicator representative of the quality of the RF signals in the current sub-set. If such a candidate sub-set is located, the candidate sub-set is substituted for the current subset. When the selection step is (at least partly) repeated, the RF signals received from the candidate sub-set being tested are combined into a single RF signal for demodulation and may be used for reception.
In that way, measurements on alternative beams can be performed simultaneously or almost simultaneously with the reception of user data, by using a single RF chain. The received signal quality on some of the alternative beams can be measured without completely interrupting the reception of the user data from the selected beam, with a small number of periodical measures of the signal quality on alternative beams. This avoids giving rise to an appreciable interruption or packet loss, with a reduced impact on the quality of the received service.
Without prejudice to the underlying principles of the invention, the details and the embodiments may vary, even appreciably, with reference to what has been described by way of example only, without departing from the scope of the invention as defined by the annexed claims.
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP2007/011140 | 12/19/2007 | WO | 00 | 10/21/2010 |
| Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| WO2009/080057 | 7/2/2009 | WO | A |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 5504465 | Yung et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5930293 | Light et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5982825 | Tsujimoto | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6154652 | Park et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6259730 | Solondz | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6438389 | Sandhu et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
| 6658269 | Golemon et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6907272 | Roy | Jun 2005 | B2 |
| 6917597 | Schmidl et al. | Jul 2005 | B1 |
| 6992621 | Casas et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7062294 | Rogard et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
| 7155192 | Ghassemzadeh et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
| 7403748 | Keskitalo et al. | Jul 2008 | B1 |
| 7433713 | Haskell et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
| 7450907 | Shurvinton et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7653149 | Strich et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
| 7697626 | Wang et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
| 8185161 | Haskell et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 20010016504 | Dam et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
| 20020187813 | Guo | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20020190790 | Cheng et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20040087294 | Wang | May 2004 | A1 |
| 20040224655 | Petrov et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040234012 | Rooyen | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20040266338 | Rowitch | Dec 2004 | A1 |
| 20050025271 | Molisch et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050143037 | Stratis et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050163270 | Akita et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050181831 | Doi | Aug 2005 | A1 |
| 20050227619 | Lee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
| 20050287692 | Kim et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
| 20060079221 | Grant et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
| 20070080886 | Thomas et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070093269 | Leabman | Apr 2007 | A1 |
| 20070205943 | Nassiri-Toussi et al. | Sep 2007 | A1 |
| 20100322336 | Nabar et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
| 20110097992 | Goransson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
| 20110261805 | Landry et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20110274194 | Feher | Nov 2011 | A1 |
| 20110312269 | Judd et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
| 20120039410 | Feher | Feb 2012 | A1 |
| 20120069131 | Abelow | Mar 2012 | A1 |
| 20120099668 | Sakata et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 1 164 718 | Dec 2001 | EP |
| 1 267 501 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 1267501 | Dec 2002 | EP |
| 1475904 | Nov 2004 | EP |
| 1 489 758 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 1487134 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| 1489758 | Dec 2004 | EP |
| WO 0203568 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO 0203568 | Jan 2002 | WO |
| WO 03055097 | Jul 2003 | WO |
| WO 2006023247 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO-2006023247 | Mar 2006 | WO |
| WO 2006037364 | Apr 2006 | WO |
| WO 2007019185 | Feb 2007 | WO |
| WO 2007038969 | Apr 2007 | WO |
| WO 2008064696 | Jun 2008 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Fahmy et al.; “Ad Hoc Networks with Smart Antennas Using IEEE 802.11-Based Protocols”, ICC 2002, 2002 IEEE International Conference on Communications, Conference Proceedings, pp. 3144-3148, (2002). |
| European International Search Report for International Application No. PCT/EP2007/011140, mailing date Oct. 28, 2008. |
| “(O)RLANS in the Frequency Band 2400-2483.5 MHz”, Electronic Communications Committee (ECC) within the European Conference of Postal and Telecommunications Administrations (CEPT), ECC Report 57, pp. 1-17, (2004). |
| A. Wittneben, “A New Bandwidth Efficient Transmit Antenna Modulation Diversity Scheme for Linear Digital Modulation,” ICC Conference, pp. 1630-1634, Geneva (May 1993). |
| S. Kim et al., “Time-Delay Phase Shifter Controlled by Piezoelectric Transducer on Coplanar Waveguide,” IEEE Microwave and Wireless Components Letters, vol. 13, No. 1, pp. 19-20 (Jan. 2003). |
| J. Lee et al., CDMA Systems Engineering Handbook, pp. 256-262 (1998). |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20110026418 A1 | Feb 2011 | US |
