Appendices A, B, and C are attached hereto and form part of the application as filed.
The present invention relates to a system and method for teaching vocabulary, more particularly to teaching math vocabulary.
An educational approach using spatial-temporal reasoning, making a mental image and projecting it ahead in space and time by performing a temporal sequence of spatial operations on that image, is an alternative approach to the traditional language-based education. Spatial-temporal software is used to help persons learn math concepts by using a spatial temporal approach. Spatial-temporal software includes, but is not limited to, software games designed to train students to use spatial-temporal abilities to conceptually learn and understand math concepts. “Keeping Mozart in Mind” by Gordon L. Shaw, Ph.D. (Academic Press 2000) and Appendix A provide some examples of spatial-temporal software. “Keeping Mozart in Mind” by Gordon L. Shaw, Ph.D. (Academic Press 2000) is incorporated by reference in its entirety herein. Spatial-temporal software includes a broader range of software than those disclosed in Gordon L. Shaw's book and Appendix A. In some situations, spatial-temporal software teaches math concepts to persons that unsuccessfully attempted to learn those math concepts through traditional language-based approach. In some situations, spatial-temporal software teaches math concepts to persons; however, the standardized test scores of those persons fail to reflect their knowledge of those math concepts. Accordingly, a method and system are needed to increase a person's test scores to reflect the proficiency demonstrated by the spatial-temporal software. Embodiments of the present invention seek to overcome some or all of these and other problems.
In an aspect of an embodiment of the invention, a language-based test that is designed to test concepts (e.g., math concepts or the like) and spatial-temporal software that is configured to teach some or all of those concepts are provided. A list of vocabulary terms is advantageously provided, wherein some or all of the terms appear in the language-based test. In another aspect, a set of flashcards advantageously uses a set or subset of the list of vocabulary terms and optionally combines the set or subset with corresponding portions (e.g., math concepts, game concepts or the like) of the spatial-temporal software. In another aspect, a story advantageously uses a set or subset of the list of vocabulary terms and optionally combines the set or subset with corresponding portions of the spatial-temporal software. For example, in a preferred embodiment, a student advantageously plays a spatial-temporal software game and consequently learns some or all of the concepts tested in a language-based test. Where the student is unfamiliar with the vocabulary terms associated with the learned concepts, the student advantageously reviews the flashcards and/or advantageously reviews the story to associate the vocabulary terms with the learned concepts. Consequently, the student learns the definitions of the vocabulary terms, and where a student's past performance on language-based tests has been low from an inadequate vocabulary, the student's performance on language-based tests improves.
In another embodiment of the invention, the spatial-temporal software is provided in which a set or subset of the terms from the list of the vocabulary terms is associated with corresponding portions of the spatial-temporal software. For example, in an illustrative embodiment, a set or subset of the terms from the list of vocabulary terms is advantageously displayed within a spatial-temporal software game along with other portions of the software for the purpose of helping the student playing the game associate the vocabulary terms with the corresponding portions of the software. Consequently, the student learns the definitions of the vocabulary terms, and where a student's past performance on language-based tests has been low from an inadequate vocabulary, the student's performance on language-based tests improves.
For purposes of summarizing the invention, certain aspects, advantages and novel features of the invention have been described herein. Of course, it is to be understood that not necessarily all such aspects, advantages or features will be embodied in any particular embodiment of the invention.
The drawings and the following descriptions are provided to illustrate embodiments of the invention and not to limit the scope of the invention.
In some situations, spatial-temporal software teaches math concepts to persons that unsuccessfully attempted to learn those math concepts through traditional language-based approach. For some persons, spatial-temporal software teaches math concepts to the persons; however, the language-based test scores of those persons fail to reflect their knowledge of those math concepts. For example only and not to limit the scope of the invention, a child may lack certain language skills. In that situation, a low score from a language-based, standardized test score reflects that child's lack of the knowledge of the language and not the child's true understanding of the math concepts that are being tested. For example only and not to limit the scope of the invention, in another instance, the child lacks certain language skills because the child speaks a first language and the standardized test is in a secondary language.
In one embodiment of the invention, a list of vocabulary terms is provided, wherein the terms appear in a targeted test. For example only and not to limit the scope of the invention, a standardized, language-based is the targeted test. An example of a list of vocabulary terms is provided in the index of the story of Appendix B, and is intended as an example only and not to limit the scope of the claimed invention. In a preferred embodiment, the list of vocabulary terms comprises the list of vocabulary terms provided in the index of the story of Appendix B. In another embodiment, the list of vocabulary terms comprises at least fifty percent of the list of vocabulary terms provided in the index of the story of Appendix B; however, other percentages greater than fifty percent may be used in this embodiment. In another embodiment, a list of vocabulary terms comprises any suitable combination of vocabulary terms found in standardized tests, textbooks, sample exams, practice exams, practice books, or any math-related medium. In the situation where the standardized test score fails to reflect the knowledge of the person, the list of vocabulary terms may be used to help to bridge the difference between the person's knowledge and the standardized test score. Lists may be used for purposes beyond improving standardized, language-based test performance.
In another embodiment on the invention, flashcards are provided, wherein the flashcards use a set or subset of the terms from the list of vocabulary terms. In the situation where the standardized test score fails to reflect the knowledge of the person, the flash cards may help to bridge the difference between the person's knowledge and the standardized test score. Flashcards may be used for purposes beyond improving standardized, language-based test performance. Flashcards may be displayed and provided in any suitable means, including, but not limited to, software display, an Internet document format, and tangible cards. Flashcards are provided in Appendix C, and are intended as examples only and not to limit the scope of the claimed invention.
In another embodiment of the invention, flashcards are provided in which a set or subset of the terms from the list of the vocabulary terms is combined with corresponding portions of the spatial-temporal software. Corresponding portions of the spatial-temporal software include, but are not limited to, the concepts, characters, visual elements, textual elements, audio elements, or any suitable sensory elements in software games. Through combining the vocabulary terms with portions of the spatial temporal software, the flashcards are used to learn vocabulary terms associated with the math concepts from the spatial-temporal math software. In the situation where the standardized test score fails to reflect the knowledge of the person, using the flashcards helps the person to bridge the difference between the person's knowledge and the standardized test score. Flashcards are provided in Appendix C, and are intended as examples only and not to limit the scope of the claimed invention.
In another embodiment of the invention, a story is provided in which a set or subset of the terms from the list of vocabulary terms are used. In another embodiment, a story is provided in which a set or subset of the terms in the list of vocabulary terms is combined with corresponding portions of the spatial-temporal software. Corresponding portions of the spatial-temporal software include, but are not limited to, the concepts, characters, visual elements, textual elements, audio elements, or any suitable sensory elements in software games. Through combining the vocabulary terms with portions of the spatial temporal software, the story is used to learn the vocabulary terms associated with the math concepts from the spatial-temporal math software. In the situation where the standardized test score fails to reflect the knowledge of the person, reading the story helps the person to bridge the difference between the person's knowledge and the standardized test score. Stories may be used for purposes beyond improving standardized, language-based test performance. Stories may be displayed in any suitable media, including, but not limited to, software display, an Internet document format, books, comic books, newspaper, and magazines. In another embodiment of the invention, vocabulary terms are displayed in text that is different from other text in the story in any suitable manner, including, but not limited to, a different font type, font style, font size, or font color. An example of a story is provided in Appendix B, and is intended as an example only and not to limit the scope of the claimed invention.
In another embodiment of the invention, a story and flashcards are provided in which a set or subset of the terms from the list of the vocabulary terms is used. In another embodiment of the invention, a story and flashcards are provided in which a set or subset of the terms from the list of the vocabulary terms is combined with corresponding portions of the spatial-temporal software. Portions of the software include, but are not limited to, the concepts, characters, visual elements, textual elements, audio elements, or any suitable sensory elements in software games. In the embodiments where a story and flashcards are provided, the flashcards and story may be provided in any combination of suitable forms of stories and flashcards. They may, but need not be, provided in the same form. In another embodiment, a story and flashcards are provided in a software format. In another embodiment, a spatial-temporal software game, a corresponding story, and corresponding flashcards are provided in a software format. In the embodiments where a story and flashcards are provided, the story and flashcards may share similar concepts, characters, visual elements, textual elements, audio elements, or any suitable sensory elements, which may or may not be embodied in a spatial-temporal software program.
In another embodiment of the invention, spatial-temporal software is provided in which a set or subset of the terms from the list of the vocabulary terms is associated with corresponding portions of the spatial-temporal software within the spatial-temporal software program itself, Portions of the software include, but are not limited to, the concepts, characters, visual elements, textual elements, audio elements, or any suitable sensory elements in software games. For example only and not to limit the scope of the invention, in one embodiment of the invention, a set or subset of the terms from the list of vocabulary terms may be displayed within a spatial-temporal software game along with other portions of the software for the purpose of helping the person playing the game associate the terms with the corresponding portions of the software. The vocabulary terms may be displayed in a similar manner to the way that a story would display them, or may be displayed in any suitable manner. In the situation where the standardized test score fails to reflect the knowledge of the person, using the software helps the person to bridge the difference between the person's knowledge and the standardized test score. Spatial-temporal software may be used for purposes beyond improving standardized, language-based test performance.
In another embodiment of the invention, the spatial-temporal software is provided in which the spatial-temporal software comprises certain concepts. In one embodiment of the invention, the spatial-temporal software comprises math concepts, which include addition, subtraction, multiplication, place value, fractions, measurement, probability, estimation, equations, symmetry, proportions, graphs, telling time, ratios, and any other suitable math concept. In one embodiment of the invention, the spatial-temporal software comprises game concepts, which include game tasks, game objectives, game processes, or any suitable element of the game. These games concepts may be, but need not be, designed to teach certain math concepts. The spatial temporal software may comprise other concepts than those listed herein.
In another embodiment of the invention, any combination of spatial-temporal software, a story, and flashcards are provided for a target age range, school level range, or other suitable group criteria. The range may contain one or more ages. The range may contain one or more school grade levels. While this embodiment may be created for a target age range, this embodiment may be used for remedial purposes for persons outside the target range, including, but not limited to younger children, older children, and adults. For example only and not to limit the scope of the invention, in a preferred embodiment, the list of vocabulary terms in the index of the story of Appendix B, the story of Appendix B, the spatial temporal software described in Appendix A, and the flashcards of Appendix C are used to target children in the second grade.
In another embodiment of the invention, the vocabulary list and the spatial-temporal software involve other areas of knowledge, including, but not limited to, the sciences.
In the embodiments of the invention, the software may be any suitable software and need not be limited to spatial-temporal software. In the embodiments of the invention, the software may be operated on any suitable system, comprising one or more suitable computing devices.
For example only and not to limit the scope of the invention, a preferred embodiment of the invention is illustrated in
As shown in
As noted above,
As shown in
For example only and not to limit the scope of the invention, in a preferred embodiment of the invention, a teacher provides a spatial-temporal software game for the student to play and learn math concepts. At this point, the student may or may not know the vocabulary terms that correspond to the math concepts. The teacher provides a reading assignment for the student as an after-school supplement to the in-class instruction. In a further embodiment, the reading assignment is from the story in Appendix B. In an additional embodiment, the teacher reviews the flashcards with the student in class. In a further embodiment, the flashcards are from Appendix C. Reviewing the flashcards from Appendix C and reading the story from Appendix B advantageously help the student to learn the vocabulary terms from the index of the story in Appendix B. Consequently, the student achieves a higher score on the language-based, standardized test.
For example only and not to limit the scope of the invention, in another preferred embodiment of the invention, the teacher provides a software application package to the student. The software application package comprises a spatial temporal software game, a story, and flashcards. The teacher instructs the student to play the spatial-temporal software game, read the story, and review the flashcards according to a suitable instruction plan chosen by the teacher.
Although this invention has been described in terms of certain preferred embodiments, other embodiments that are apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art, including embodiments which do not provide all of the benefits and features set forth herein, are also within the scope of this invention. Additionally, other combinations, omissions, substitutions and modifications will be apparent to the skilled artisan in view of the disclosure herein. Accordingly, the present invention is not intended to be limited by the reaction of the preferred embodiments, but is to he defined by reference to the appended claims.
Additionally, all publications, patents, and patent applications mentioned in this specification are herein incorporated by reference to the same extent as if each individual publication, patent, or patent application was specifically and individually indicated to be incorporated by reference.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/319,254, filed on Dec. 12, 2002 (now issued as U.S. Pat. No. 7,182,600), which claims the benefit under 35 U.S.C. §119(e) of U.S. Provisional Application No. 60/340,514, filed Dec. 13, 2001, and entitled “Method and System for Teaching Vocabulary.” The entire contents of each of the above-referenced applications are hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3596377 | Abbey | Aug 1971 | A |
3698277 | Barra | Oct 1972 | A |
4402249 | Zankman | Sep 1983 | A |
4416182 | Wise et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4820165 | Kanapa | Apr 1989 | A |
4867685 | Brush et al. | Sep 1989 | A |
5059127 | Lewis et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5169342 | Steele et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
5261823 | Kurokawa | Nov 1993 | A |
5302132 | Corder | Apr 1994 | A |
5447166 | Gevins | Sep 1995 | A |
5447438 | Watanabe et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5478240 | Cogliano | Dec 1995 | A |
5486112 | Troudet et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5533903 | Kennedy | Jul 1996 | A |
5574238 | Mencher | Nov 1996 | A |
5584699 | Silver | Dec 1996 | A |
5590057 | Fletcher et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5618182 | Thomas | Apr 1997 | A |
5690496 | Kennedy | Nov 1997 | A |
5727951 | Ho et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5746605 | Kennedy | May 1998 | A |
5779486 | Ho et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5783764 | Amar | Jul 1998 | A |
5797130 | Nelson et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5806056 | Hekmatpour | Sep 1998 | A |
5810605 | Siefert | Sep 1998 | A |
5820386 | Sheppard | Oct 1998 | A |
5822745 | Hekmatpour | Oct 1998 | A |
5827066 | Henter | Oct 1998 | A |
5841655 | Stocking et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842868 | Phillips | Dec 1998 | A |
5870731 | Trif et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5870768 | Hekmatpour | Feb 1999 | A |
5886273 | Haruyama et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5904485 | Siefert | May 1999 | A |
5907831 | Lotvin et al. | May 1999 | A |
5934909 | Ho et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5956040 | Asano et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5957699 | Peterson et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5987302 | Driscoll et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987443 | Nichols et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6000945 | Sanchez-Lazer et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6020886 | Jacober et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6030226 | Hersh | Feb 2000 | A |
6045515 | Lawton | Apr 2000 | A |
6047261 | Siefert | Apr 2000 | A |
6072113 | Tohgi et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6077085 | Parry et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6112049 | Sonnenfeld | Aug 2000 | A |
6118973 | Ho et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6144838 | Sheehan | Nov 2000 | A |
6155971 | Calhoun et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164971 | Figart | Dec 2000 | A |
6166314 | Weinstock et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6186794 | Brown et al. | Feb 2001 | B1 |
6206700 | Brown et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6213956 | Lawton | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6270352 | Ditto | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6281422 | Kawamura | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6288315 | Bennett | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6334779 | Siefert | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6336813 | Siefert | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6352475 | Mraovic | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6364666 | Jenkins et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6386883 | Siefert | May 2002 | B2 |
6388181 | Moe | May 2002 | B2 |
6390918 | Yagi et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418298 | Sonnenfeld | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6419496 | Vaughan, Jr. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6435508 | Tavel | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6480698 | Ho et al. | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6484010 | Sheehan | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6486388 | Akahori | Nov 2002 | B2 |
6513042 | Anderson et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6514084 | Thomas | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6526258 | Bejar et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6565359 | Calhoun et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
6582235 | Tsai et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6629892 | Oe et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
6644973 | Oster | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648648 | O'Connell | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6676412 | Masterson et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6676413 | Best et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6688889 | Wallace et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699123 | Matsuura et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6716033 | Lassowsky | Apr 2004 | B1 |
6751439 | Tice et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6755657 | Wasowicz | Jun 2004 | B1 |
6755661 | Sugimoto | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6827578 | Krebs et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
6905340 | Stansvik | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6915286 | Policastro et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6978115 | Whitehurst et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
6978244 | Rovinelli et al. | Dec 2005 | B2 |
7024398 | Kilgard et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
7122004 | Cassily | Oct 2006 | B1 |
7182600 | Shaw et al. | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7184701 | Heslip | Feb 2007 | B2 |
7199298 | Funaki | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7220907 | McIntosh | May 2007 | B2 |
7294107 | Simon et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7451065 | Pednault et al. | Nov 2008 | B2 |
7775866 | Mizuguchi et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
8083523 | De Ley et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8137106 | De Ley et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8491311 | Bodner et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8577280 | Hutchingson et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
20010018178 | Siefert | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010023059 | Toki | Sep 2001 | A1 |
20010036620 | Peer et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010041330 | Brown et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20010046659 | Oster | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020002411 | Higurashi et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020005109 | Miller | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020032733 | Howard | Mar 2002 | A1 |
20020042790 | Nagahara | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020076684 | Blevins et al. | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020102522 | Sugimoto | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020142278 | Whitehurst et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020150868 | Yui et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020160347 | Wallace et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020168100 | Woodall | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020169822 | Packard et al. | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020177113 | Sherlock | Nov 2002 | A1 |
20020188583 | Rukavina et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030009352 | Bolotinikov et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030017442 | Tudor et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030017443 | Kilgore | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030027122 | Stansvik | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030039948 | Donahue | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030059759 | Calhoun et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
20030077559 | Braunberger et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030113697 | Plescia | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20030129574 | Ferriol et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030129576 | Wood et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030148253 | Sacco et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030151628 | Salter | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030151629 | Krebs et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030157469 | Embretson | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030165800 | Shaw et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030167902 | Hiner et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030167903 | Funaki | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030176931 | Pednault et al. | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20030232318 | Altenhofen et al. | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040005536 | Lai et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040007118 | Holcombe | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040014017 | Lo | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040014021 | Suleiman | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040033475 | Mizuma et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040039603 | Hanrahan | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040111310 | Szlam et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040134630 | Lahtinen et al. | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040137984 | Salter | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040166484 | Budke et al. | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20040180317 | Bodner et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040237756 | Forbes | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244564 | McGregor | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040260584 | Terasawa | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050064375 | Blank | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20070046678 | Peterson et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070134630 | Shaw et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070257906 | Shimura et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070265083 | Ikebata | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281285 | Jayaweera | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20090081626 | Milgram et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090325137 | Peterson et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100209896 | Weary et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20140186816 | Peterson et al. | Jul 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO2007028142 | Aug 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Shaw, G.L., “Keeping Mozart in Mind,” M.I.N.D. Institute/University of California, Academic Press, 2000, Cover Page, Table of Contents, Chapters 2, 12, 13, 14, 18, 19, 20, 23. |
Shaw et al., “Music Training Causes Long-Term Enhancement of Preschool Children's Spatial-Temporal Reasoning” Neurological Research (1997); vol. 19, No. 1; pp. 1-8; Forefront Publishing Group, Wilton, CT, USA. |
Bodner, Peterson, Rodgers, Shaw et al., “Spatial-Temporal (ST) Math Video Game Results Show Rapid Learning Curves Supportive of Innate ST Brain Function” Oct. 9, 2006; ScholarOne, Inc., 2000 (2001); 1 page. |
Peterson, Bodner, Rodgers, Shaw et al., Music—Math Program Based on Cortical Model Enhances 2nd Graders Performance on Advanced Math Concepts and Stanford 9 Math; Oct. 9, 2006; ScholarOne, Inc. (2000); 1 page. |
Peterson, Shaw et al., “Enhanced Learning of Proportional Math Through Music Training and Spatial-Temporal Training” Neurological Research(1999) vol. 21; Forefront Publishing Group; pp. 139-152. |
Bodner and Shaw, “Symmetry Math Video Game Used to Train Profound Spatial-Temporal Reasoning Abilities Equivalent to Dynamical Knot Theory” American Mathematical Society (2004); vol. 34; pp. 189-202. |
Bodner and Shaw, “Symmetry Operations in the Brain: Music and Reasoning” (2001); pp. 1-30. |
Peterson, Bodner, Shaw et al., “Innate Spatial-Temporal Reasoning and the Identification of Genius” Neurological Research, vol. 26, Jan. 2004; W.S. Maney & Son Ltd.; pp. 2-8. |
Special Report—Summary of the 2002 M.I.N.D.® Institute newsletter which details data from 2nd graders in our Music Spatial-Temporal Math Program (2002) vol. 1, Issue 2; pp. 1-12. |
Shaw GL, Bodner M, Patera J “Innate Brain Language and Grammar: Implications for Human Language and Music” In Stochastic Point Processes (eds Srinivasan SK and Vihayakumar A). Narosa Publishing, New Dehli (2003); pp. 287-303. |
Bodner M, Shaw GL, “Music Math Connection” Journal of music and movement based learning. (2002) vol. 8, No. 3; pp. 9-16. |
Watson S. Wind M, Yee M, Bodner M, Shaw GL., “Effective Music Training for Children with Autism” Early Childhood Connections, (2003); vol. 9; pp. 27-32. |
Hu W, Bodner M, Jones EG, Peterson MR, Shaw GL, “Data Mining of Mathematical Reasoning Data Relevant to Large Innate Spatial-Temporal Reasoning Abilities in Children: Implications for Data Driven Education” Soc. Neurosci. Abst. 34th annual meeting (2004); 1 page. |
Hu W, Bodner M, Jones EG, Peterson M, Shaw GL., “Dynamics of Innate Spatial-Temporal Learning Process: Data Driven Education Results Identify Universal Barriers to Learning” 6th Annual International Conference on Complex Systems (2004); 8 pages. |
M.I.N.D.® Institute, Research Division, “Education = Music Math Causal Connection”, Position Paper #1, Jul. 2002, 2 pages. |
M.I.N.D.® Institute, Research Division, “The race to raise a brainer baby”, Position Paper #2, Aug. 2002, 1 page. |
M.I.N.D.® Institute, Research Division, “Trion Music Game: Breakthrough in the Landmark Math + Music Program”, Position Paper #3, Jan. 2003, 1 page. |
M.I.N.D.® Institute, Research Division, “Cramming v. Understanding”, Position Paper #4, Feb. 2003, 1 page. |
Today@UCI: Press Release: Piano and Computer Training Boost Student Math Achievement, UC Irvine Study Shows [online]; Mar. 15, 1999 [retrieved on Mar. 16, 2008]; Retrieved from the Internet: URL:http://today.uci.edu/news/release—detail.asp?key=646. |
International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US06/34462, dated Aug. 30, 2007, 2 pgs. |
“The Stochastic Learning Curve: Optimal Production in the Presence of Learning-Curve Uncertainty”, Joseph B. Mazzola and Kevin F. McCardle; Source: Operations Research, vol. 45, No. 3 (May-Jun. 1997), pp. 440-450. |
“Toward a Theory of continuous Improvement and the Learning Curve”, Willard I. Zangwill and Paul B. Kantor; Management Science, vol. 44, No. 7 (Jul. 1998), pp. 910-920. |
“Rigorous Learning Curve Bounds from Statistical Mechanics” by David Haussler, Michael Kearns, H. Sebastian Seung, Naftali Tishby, (1996), Machine Learning 25, pp. 195-236. |
“The Learning Curve: Historical Review and Comprehensive Survey”, Louis E. Yelle, Universit of Lowell, pp. 1-27. |
“Seer: Maximum Likelihood Regression for Learning-Speed Curves”, Carl Myers Kadie, Graduate college of the University of Illinois at Urbana—Champaign, 1995, pp. 1-104. |
Kennedy, Brian, Tetris Plus—Jaleco. Review and description of Tetris Plus [online], [retrieved on May 29, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http//dextremes.com/sega/revs/tetrisplus.html>. |
Thompson, Jon. Tetris Plus Review. [online], [retrieved on May 29, 2013]. Retrieved from the Internet <URL:http://www.allgame.com/game.php?id=1968&tab=review>. |
Restriction-Election Requirement for U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,493, dated Mar. 30, 2015. |
Response to Election/ Restriction for U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,493, dated May 7, 2015. |
Non-Final Rejection (1) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,493, dated Jun. 26, 2015. |
Response after Non-Final Action (1) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,493, dated Sep. 25, 2015. |
Non-Final Rejection (2) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,493, dated Dec. 7, 2015. |
Response after Non-Final Action (2) for U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,493, dated Mar. 7, 2016. |
Final Rejection for U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,493, dated May 25, 2016. |
Response after Final Action for U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,493, dated Oct. 25, 2016. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,493, dated Dec. 16, 2016. |
Response to Reasons for Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/729,493, dated Mar. 14, 2017. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20070134630 A1 | Jun 2007 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60340514 | Dec 2001 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10319254 | Dec 2002 | US |
Child | 11673414 | US |