Method and system for testing a borehole by the use of a movable plug

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6631763
  • Patent Number
    6,631,763
  • Date Filed
    Tuesday, February 5, 2002
    22 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, October 14, 2003
    20 years ago
Abstract
A method and a system for testing a borehole in an underground formation by the use of so-called closed chamber testing. When carrying out the method, a test or production pipe (5) is carried down the borehole, where the test pipe can be closed at its upper end and at its lower end is provided with a downhole assembly (6) comprising equipment for testing of fluid flow from the formation (3), the annulus (23) between the test pipe (5) and a casing (20) in the borehole being shut off during the test by a gasket (22) at a desired depth, and fluid from the formation being allowed to flow through the test pipe (5) to a collecting tank (9) coupled to the test pipe via a flow head (4) at the upper end of the test pipe (5). In the downhole assembly (6) at the lower end of the test pipe (5) there is releasably retained a pig (30) forming a barrier between formation fluid and a lightweight damping fluid (7) filling the test pipe above the pig, the pig (30) being released at the start of the test and being moved in a controlled manner upwards in the pipe (5) as a result of a positive pressure difference between the fluids below and above the pig.
Description




The invention relates to a method of testing a borehole in an underground formation by the use of so-called closed chamber testing, wherein a test pipe is lowered into the borehole, which pipe is closable at its upper end and at its lower end is provided with a downhole assembly comprising equipment for testing of fluid flow from the formation, the annulus between the test pipe and a casing in the borehole being shut off during the test by a gasket at a desired depth, and fluid from the formation being allowed to flow through the test pipe to a collecting tank coupled to the test pipe at the upper end thereof.




Further, the invention relates to a system for such testing, comprising a test pipe which is adapted to be lowered into the borehole and at its lower end is provided with a downhole assembly comprising equipment for testing of fluid flow from the formation, a gasket for shutting off the annulus between the test pipe and a casing in the borehole, and a collecting tank coupled to the test pipe via a flow head at the upper end of the test pipe.




As will be known to a person skilled in the art, testing of petroleum wells are carried out to find out the petroleum production potential of the well and to measure the properties, characteristic and spreading of the reservoir and the reservoir fluid. In such testing, different testing methods are used, including so-called closed chamber testing. The existing methods of this type typically utilize an empty chamber (filled with air or nitrogen), which produces a high differential pressure over the reservoir surface. This results in a shock wave with high velocity, which is intended to remove possible debris or possible blockings from the perforation tunnels, but may also result in formation brakedown. The inflow velocity at the beginning will be high, but will decrease as the chamber is filled with a heavier fluid.




The known systems have a number of weaknesses which can be summarized as follows:




mixing of borehole and reservoir-fluids,




lack of accurate flow velocity measurements and volume control,




lacking ability of achieving representatives specimens of borehole fluids because of contamination,




constantly varying flow velocities, the chamber typically running “empty”, so that an initial shock wave will arise, followed by gradually lower velocities as the chamber is filled,




high probability of slug flow (irregular two-phase flow) from zones having a low productivity because of gas breakouts,




no real time downhole data




interpretation of transient data because of varying flow velocity and storage effects,




not suitable for testing of wells having a high flow potensial.




On this background it is a general object of the invention to provide a method and a system, based on closed chamber testing, wherein the above-mentioned weaknesses are at least essentially eliminated.




A more specific object of the invention is to provide a method and a system wherein the flow velocity of the formation fluid can be measured accurately by controlling the inflow and thereby the downhole pressure.




Further objects of the invention are to provide a system which facilitates testing and sampling without producing well fluids to the surface, and wherein the system is constructed such that a test can be stopped at any time and fluids reinjected into the reservoir.




For achieving the above-mentioned objects there is provided a method of the introductorily stated type which, according to the invention, is characterized in that, in a pipe section at the lower end of the test pipe, there is releasably retained a pig forming a barrier between formation fluid and a lightweight damping fluid filling the pipe above the pig, the pig being released at the start of the test and being moved in a controlled manner upwards in the pipe as a result of a positive pressure difference between the fluids below and above the pig.




Further, there is provided a system of the introductorily stated type which, according to the invention, is characterized in that it comprises a pig arranged to be retained releasably and in a sealing manner in a pipe section at the lower end of the test pipe, and a reservoir for a lightweight damping fluid arranged to be supplied to the test pipe via the flow head, in order to substantially fill the test pipe above the pig at the start of the test, so that the pig forms a barrier between fluid from the formation and the damping fluid above the pig.











The invention will be further described below in-connection with exemplary embodiments with reference to the drawings, wherein,





FIG. 1

shows a schematic view of surface equipment necessary for carrying out a test according to the invention;





FIG. 2

shows a sectional view of the lower end portion of a borehole and the lower portion of a test pipe with an associated first embodiment of a downhole assembly in a system according to the invention;





FIG. 3

shows a segment of the downhole assembly in

FIG. 2

, with a pig placed in the actual passage thereof;





FIG. 4

shows a part of the downhole assembly in

FIG. 2

, with a sliding sleeve valve therein in closed position;





FIG. 5

shows the upper end of the test pipe with a surface type pig receiver and a pig which is introduced therein;





FIG. 6

shows a downhole type pig receiver in the test pipe;





FIG. 7

shows a sectional view of the lower end portion of the borehole and the lower end portion of a test pipe with an alternative embodiment of the downhole assembly;





FIG. 8

shows a sectional view of an embodiment of a two-stage pig in a pig receiver;





FIGS. 9 and 10

show sectional views of a modified lower pig receiver with a two-stage pig therein;





FIGS. 11 and 12

show sectional views of a modified upper pig receiver with a two-stage pig therein;





FIG. 13

shows a sectional view of an embodiment of a multi-function pig placed in a lower pig receiver or pig holder; and





FIGS. 14-20

show corresponding sectional views as in

FIG. 13

of the multi-function pig in different operational phases during transfer of the pig between the lower and an upper pig holder.











In the drawing figures corresponding parts and elements are designated by the same reference numerals.




The schematic view in

FIG. 1

shows circuit equipment which is necessary for effecting a closed chamber test according to the invention. In the figure there is suggested a borehole


1


extending from the surface


2


of the earth down to a hydrocarbon-carrying earth formation


3


which is to be tested. At the surface there is arranged a flow head


4


connected to the upper end of a test string or test pipe


5


extending through the borehole and its lower end being provided with a downhole assembly


6


comprising, inter alia, necessary equipment for testing and sampling of well fluids from the formation


3


, as further described in connection with

FIGS. 2 and 5

. The shown cross-hatching symbolises that the test pipe


5


is filled with a lightweight cushion or damping fluid


7


which, during the execution of a test, is pressed upwards through the test pipe and supplied via the flow head


4


and a line


8


to a calibrated collecting tank. As a damping fluid there may suitably be used sea water, but the final choice of fluid will depend on the geological pressure gradient and the hydrocarbon-producing capacity of the formation.




The flow head


4


is also connected through a line


10


and a pump


11


to a tank


12


containing mud or damping fluid for supply to the test pipe by means of the pump


11


. The flow head is provided with suitable valves (not shown) for opening and closing the connection between said lines and the test pipe as required.




On the line


8


there is also shown to be connected a flow control means in the form of a choke valve


13


, and also a measuring unit


14


(optional) for measuring flow velocity. Further, the tank


9


has an outlet pipe


15


leading to a reinjection pump.




The equipment shown in

FIG. 1

in practice, in connection with offshore oil drilling, may be arranged on a floating drilling rig, whereby the test pipe then will extend through the borehole up to a wellhead at the seabed, and further up through the body of water to the rig in question.




As stated above, a pig is arranged at the lower end of the test pipe, which pig is releasably retained in the downhole assembly


6


as further described below, and during a test forms a barrier between formation fluid flowing into the test pipe, and the damping fluid above the plug. At the start of a test sequence, the well is opened at the surface flow head


4


after that perforation has been carried out and the pig has been released, and the flow is directed towards the calibrated tank


9


. The rate of flow is controlled by the choke


13


, and flow velocity measurements are carried out by the measuring unit


14


and confirmed by physical measurements at the tank


9


. In addition, measurement of pressure and temperature is carried out at the choke


13


, and these parameters are also measured downhole and at the flow head


4


.




After completion of the test the produced fluids are pumped back to the production interval in the formation


3


by use of the pump


11


and either mud or damping fluid from the mud tank system


12


on the relevant rig. Alternatively, the calibrated tank may be connected to the pump


11


and the produced damping fluid utilised once more as a displacement fluid.




The clean, incompressible and non-contaminating damping fluid which is placed above the pig, will function as a flow control as well as a volume control medium, as it is recovered in the calibrated tank


9


.




An embodiment of a downhole or test assembly


6


, which is arranged at the lower end of a production or test pipe


5


, is shown in FIG.


2


. As suggested in the figure, a casing


20


is placed in the borehole, which casing is cemented to the borehole wall with cement


21


. At the upper end of the test assembly there is arranged a recoverable gasket


22


shutting off the annulus


23


between the casing


20


and the test pipe


5


. Below the gasket


22


there is arranged a sliding sleeve or SS valve (SS=Sliding Sleeve)


24


having a sliding sleeve


25


which is shown in the open position, so that the sliding sleeve uncovers openings


26


between the annulus


23


and an axial passage


27


extending through the downhole assembly.




Above the gasket


22


, the downhole assembly further comprises a downhole tester valve or DT valve (DT=Downhole Tester)


28


, whereas a pipe member or fitting


29


is arranged below the sliding sleeve valve


24


, which fitting contains pressure meters and samplers. The test assembly normally will also include other components which, however, are not further shown, since they will be well known to a person skilled in the art.




The afore-mentioned pig is designated by the reference numeral


30


and in

FIG. 2

is located in a pig launcher sub


31


arranged below the fitting


29


. The pig or plug


30


, which is shown on a larger scale in

FIG. 3

, comprises a sleeve-shaped body


32


having a through-going passage


33


which is blocked by a closing element


34


, and an external resiliently expandable sealing means in the form of a pair of mutually spaced annular gaskets


35


, e.g. of rubber, for sealing abutment against the inner wall of the passage


27


through the test assembly and against the inner wall of the test pipe


5


. As appears, the pig


30


is provided with spring-loaded dogs


36


for resiliently releasable engagement in a ring groove


37


in the inner wall of the passage of the pig launcher sub


31


. The spring force is adapted so that the pig is released from the ring groove at a predetermined pressure difference across the pig.




The closing element


34


of the pig is arranged to be removed from the passage


33


at a certain overpressure on the upper side of the element, so that the passage of the pig is opened for through-flow. Thus, the closing element provides a pump-out facility ensuring that fluids can circulate and the well be secured, also if the pig should get stuck in both directions. The closing element must secure pressure integrity from the lower side, so that it can only be pumped out at a predetermined pressure difference from the upper side.




As appears from

FIG. 2

, a perforated pipe length


38


is also arranged below the pig launcher sub


31


, through which formation fluid can flow into the passage


27


of the downhole assembly when the borehole wall is perforated and the pig is released from the launcher sub and moved upwards in the test pipe


5


.




As will be known to a person skilled in the art, the downhole assembly at its lower end will also include necessary equipment for perforating the casing


20


and the formation


3


, more specifically a firing head and a perforating gun. Since the perforating process is of no consequence for the execution of the present test method, these elements are not further shown or described.




The execution of a test sequence in connection with the embodiment according to

FIG. 2

will be further described below.




Before the commencement of a test, the test assembly


6


is run down the borehole, and the gasket


22


is placed at the necessary depth. Thereafter the hole is perforated as mentioned above. The initial conditions will be as follows:




the volume below the gasket will be filled with drilling mud or salt water




the annulus volume between the casing and the test pipe (production pipe), above the gasket, will be filled with drilling mud or salt water




the test pipe above the DT valve will be filled with a light-weight damping fluid, e.g. water, to secure a positive difference between the hydrostatic pressures of the reservoir and the test pipe.




The test is initiated by opening the DT valve


28


by the supply of annulus pressure and by opening at the surface. Reservoir fluid then will flow from the reservoir and into the borehole and further into the test pipe via the open SS valve


24


, as shown by arrows in FIG.


2


. The quantity of displaced fluid may be monitored at the surface in that the fluid flows into the calibrated tank


9


. When the estimated volume from the bottom of the test interval and up to the SS valve has been recovered, the DT valve


28


can be closed. Supply of an annulus pressure pulse will cause the SS valve to be closed as shown in

FIG. 4

, so that the reservoir is again isolated from the test string. The contaminated fluids now will be located above the pig


30


, and pure reservoir fluids will be in the borehole. The test is restarted in that the DT valve is opened once again. A pressure difference will be produced across the pig, and at a predetermined value the vertical forces will be sufficient to overcome the pressure force keeping the pig in place in the launcher sub


31


, and the pig will be free to move upwards in the passage


27


and further upwards in the test pipe


5


. The velocity of the pig will be determined by the productivity of the test interval and by the velocity with which the fluid above the pig is allowed to flow into the tank


9


. From this point of time the test may be interrupted at any stage, provided that one knows that the pig is situated above the DT valve, in order to produce pressure-build-ups, etc.




The test will be terminated automatically when the pig arrives at and enters into a pig receiver arranged at a chosen place in the test pipe. Examples of such pig receivers are shown in

FIGS. 5 and 6

. Thus,

FIG. 5

shows a dual valve pig receiver


40


of surface type, i.e. a receiver arranged at the surface, at the upper end of the test pipe


5


. The receiver comprises a sensor


41


detecting and indicating when the pig


30


enters the receiver, and a pair of valves


42


and


43


which may then be closed below the pig, whereafter the pig can be taken up from the receiver before produced fluid is pumped back and down into the borehole. The arrows A


1


og A


2


shown in the figure illustrate flow to the collecting tank


9


and flow from a pump, respectively, e.g. the pump


11


in FIG.


1


.





FIG. 6

shows a pig receiver


44


of downhole type, i.e. a receiver which is arranged at a chosen place along the length of the test pipe


5


. In this case the arrival of the pig


30


is indicated in that the well flow stops and an increase of the downhole pressure takes place. It will here be necessary that a possibility is provided for taking the pig up from the pipe by means of a wire, in addition to the above-mentioned pump-out facility. An annulus pressure-operated circulation valve possibly may be arranged immediately below the receiver


44


to allow reinjection of fluids in case it should not be possible to pump through the pig.





FIG. 7

shows an alternative embodiment of a downhole assembly for execution of the test method according to the invention. The components having corresponding counterparts in the embodiment in

FIG. 2

are designated by the same reference numerals and do not need any repeated description. The construction and operation of this embodiment is not very different from the embodiment in

FIG. 1

, but the difference resides in that the sliding sleeve valve


24


in

FIG. 2

is omitted and replaced by an annulus pressure cross-over sub


45


for transferring a pressure pulse to a perforating unit


46


comprising in a conventional manner a firing head and perforating guns. Further, there is arranged a gun release member


47


for automatic release of the unit


46


with the perforating guns at a point of release


48


.




In this case the release mechanism for the pig


30


is the same as in the first example, but the initial fluid flow is not taken in above the pig. In order to avoid introducing large volumes of contaminated fluid in the system, the pig must be installed as close to the top of the test interval in the formation


3


as possible.




At the introduction of a test sequence in connection with the embodiment in

FIG. 7

, the detonating fuse of the perforating unit


46


is activated by means of an annulus pressure pulse. After a delay of 5-10 minutes the perforating guns detonate and perforate the casing and the adjacent parts of the formation, and the automatic gun release is activated so that the guns fall down into the bottom of the borehole. The bottom of the pig


30


now is uncovered for the well pressure, and at the predetermined pressure difference across the pig this is relieved and pressed upwards from the pig launcher sub.




The rest of the test will be carried out as described above, either the surface or the downhole pig receiver system being used for terminating the test.




When practising the method according to the invention it may be appropriate and desirable to use a test or production pipe having a larger inner diameter than the diameter of the passage through the downhole assembly, i.e. a pipe having a larger bore as a main part of the closed chamber. This allows flow of a larger volume and a reduction of the chamber length. This will entail that standard drill pipes may be used to transport the test assembly, something which results in a substantial saving with respect to time and money. For achieving an efficient seal in the production pipe having a larger diameter, there may then be used a dual pig or two-stage pig, as shown in FIG.


8


.




In the embodiment in

FIG. 8

, the test or production pipe


5


at its lower end is shown to include a pig receiver


49


having a transition wherein the pipe passes into an upper part having a larger bore than the bore of the underlying part. The dual pig assembly comprises a lower pig


50


corresponding to the pig


30


described above, even if the detailed construction is shown to be somewhat different, and an upper pig


51


. The pigs are arranged to co-operate with each other, the lower pig


50


being adapted to be introduced into and locked in a sealing manner at the lower end of a through passage


52


in the upper pig


51


. For this purpose the pig


50


at its upper end is provided with outwards projecting dogs


53


for engagement in an annular locking groove


54


at the lower end of the passage


52


through the upper pig


51


. Further, the lower pig at its upper end is provided with a sealing O ring


55


. The upper pig


51


is provided with spring-loaded dogs


56


for releasable engagement in a suitable ring groove in the inner wall of the pig receiver


49


, to keep the pig releasably in place thereby. The lower pig


50


is provided with a pair of resilient gasket elements


57


which are here shown to have outwardly projecting ribs for sealing engagement against the pipe wall. In a similar manner the upper pig


51


is provided with a resilient gasket element


58


, e.g. a rubber seal, which also has outwards projecting ribs for sealing engagement against the inner wall of the pipe


5


.




During the initial flow, i.e. while the lower pig or first stage pig


50


moves through the downhole assembly, the damping fluid may flow freely through the upper pig or second stage pig


51


. When the lower pig


50


is introduced into the upper pig


51


, the sealing ring


55


will seal the passage


52


through the pig. At the same time the locking dogs


53


will get into engagement and lock the two pigs to each other. The following increase of the differential pressure will overcome the spring force retaining the upper pig, and the assembly then will be free to move upwards. At the top of the production pipe


5


a pig receiver of a similar type as that described above, will retain the pig assembly, so that the closing element


59


at the lower end of the lower pig


50


may be driven out by means of pump pressure from above, or the pig assembly may be taken up from the pipe by means of a wire and a fishing tool.





FIGS. 9-12

show embodiments of lower and upper pig receivers which are modified to allow flow past the pig assembly without using the pump-out possibility, i.e. expulsion of the closing element


59


in

FIG. 8

by means of pumping pressure from above. In these embodiments the pig receiver is equipped with by-pass or side channels and a pig-actuated spring means.




Thus, in the embodiment in

FIGS. 9-10

, a lower pig receiver


60


is provided with a number of side channels


61


arranged in the pig receiver wall outside of the pig receiving chamber


62


. The inner chamber wall is stepped for the formation of an upwards directed, annular shoulder


63


for the support of a spring means


64


which may consists of a number of circumferentially distributed pressure springs. In the illustrated embodiment an encircling stop ring


65


resp.


66


is arranged at the upper and lower ends of the resilient gasket element


58


on the upper pig


51


. The lower stop ring


65


serves as an abutment against the spring means


64


, whereas the upper stop ring


66


serves as an abutment against a corresponding spring means arranged in an upper pig receiver, as described below.





FIGS. 11 and 12

show an upper pig receiver


67


which is provided with a number of side channels


68


arranged in the pig receiver wall outside of the pig-receiving chamber


69


, in a corresponding manner as in the embodiment in

FIGS. 9-10

. The inner chamber wall is stepped for the formation of a downwards directed, annular shoulder


70


against which there rests a spring means


71


which may consists of a number of circumferentially distributed pressure springs.




When the pig assembly


50


,


51


has been installed in the lower receiver


61


, and no force acts on the pig from above (or from below), the rubber seal


58


on the upper pig


51


will prevent communication across the pig via the by-pass channels


61


, as shown in FIG.


9


. When the fluid pressure (pump pressure) acts from above, the pig will compress the spring means


64


, as shown in

FIG. 10

, and move downwards. Thereby, the by-pass channels


61


are opened for communication across the pig, and circulation is possible. When the pump pressure from the upper side is released, the spring means


64


will move the pig back to the normal position.




When the pig assembly


50


,


51


is introduced into the upper pig receiver


67


, no flow across the pig assembly will occur if the pressure from the underside is insufficient to compress the spring means


71


. Flow in the side channels


68


is prevented by the rubber seal


58


, as shown in FIG.


11


. When pressure from the underside of the pig is sufficient to compress the spring means


71


, the pig will move upwards, and communication across the pig is established, as shown in FIG.


12


. When releasing the pressure from the underside, the spring means


71


will move the pig back to the normal position.




The afore-mentioned two-stage pigs possibly may be replaced by a single multi-function pig. The lower part of the two-stage pig then will be superfluous. Such an embodiment is shown in FIG.


13


.




In

FIG. 13

there is shown a lower pig receiver or pig holder


75


and an upper pig receiver or pig holder


76


. The pig holders may be connected to each other via a test pipe or a production pipe (not shown). As shown, in the lower pig holder


75


there is placed a pig


77


having a pig body essentially corresponding to the pig body of the upper pig


51


in

FIGS. 9-12

, but wherein means are introduced into the interior of the pig to provide for opening or closing of the pig body with respect to fluid flow, in dependence of the relevant operational circumstances.




As appears from

FIG. 13

, the pig


77


comprises a sleeve-shaped pig body


78


surrounded by a gasket element


79


provided at its lower and upper ends with radially movable dogs


80


and


81


, respectively, for releasable engagement in respective suitable locking grooves in the lower and upper pig holders


75


and


76


. At its upper end the pig body has a centrally open transverse wall


82


from which there projects downwards a piston housing


83


receiving a vertically movable piston


84


. The piston housing has a bottom wall


85


having a central inlet opening


86


(see FIG.


14


), and a cylindrical wall member


87


having a number of upper flow ports


88


for allowing fluid flow through the pig body. The piston is dimensioned such that the flow ports


88


are open when the piston


84


is in a lower bottom position (shown in FIG.


13


), whereas they are closed when the piston is in an upper top position (shown in FIGS.


16


-


19


). The transverse wall


82


of the pig body


78


at the underside is formed with a recess for receiving the upper part of the piston


84


, and a suitable locking means


89


is provided for releasable retention of the piston in the upper position thereof.




Further, there is provided a device for opening and closing of the inlet opening


86


of the piston housing in dependence of the density of the fluid surrounding the piston housing in a given operational situation. In the illustrated embodiment this device consists of a ball


90


which is movable towards and away from the opening


86


in a guide sleeve


91


projecting downwards from the piston housing


83


and terminating at the bottom in a funnel-shaped part having an outlet opening


92


. The guide sleeve is provided with a number of side openings


93


for fluid flow. The ball


90


has a density which is lower than the density of water, but higher than the density of produced hydrocarbons, so that the position of the ball in the guide sleeve


91


will depend on the surrounding fluid. If this is water, the ball will be in an upper position in which the inlet opening


86


is closed. If the fluid is hydrocarbons, the ball will sink because of a lesser buoyancy, and will take a lower position in which the inlet opening


86


is open.




Additional equipment (for example a pressure meter, a fluid density measuring means and equipment for transmission of such information to the surface) possibly may be installed and suitably fastened in connection with the pig body. However, this is not shown or further described here.




Different operational sequences which will occur during operation when using a pig device according to

FIG. 13

, will be described below with reference to this figure and the

FIGS. 14-20

.




When the pig


77


has been installed in the lower pig holder


75


, the well is filled with water, the piston


84


is in its lower position and the ball


90


in its upper position. The flow ports


88


through the pig are open and allow circulation (both ways) through the pig. This situation is shown in FIG.


13


.




When there is produced from the well (the well is open), water and mud filtrates enter into the well and flow into the production pipe and through the pig. The ball


90


still is in its upper position according to FIG.


13


.




When hydrocarbons commence entering into the production pipe from the formation and flow through the pig, the ball


90


commences loosing buoyancy so that it sinks and makes it possible for the flow to go through the inlet opening


86


at the bottom of the piston housing


83


, as shown in FIG.


14


. The piston


84


thereby is influenced by forces from the underside, so that it begins moving upwards and begins closing the ports


88


, as also shown in FIG.


14


.




The ball


90


sinks to its lower position in the guide sleeve


91


(FIG.


15


), and the piston


84


moves to its upper position and is locked in this position (FIG.


16


). In this position the ports


88


are closed, and the fluid flow through the pig ceases. In this situation there will be water above the pig and hydrocarbons below the pig.




Forces will no act upon the pig itself, and will release the pig from the lower pig holder


75


, as shown in FIG.


17


. The pig moves within the production pipe while there is produced from the reservoir formation. There will still be hydrocarbons below the pig and water (and filtrates) above the pig.




The pig


77


moves until the well is shut off at the surface (the pressure above the pig equalizes, or until the pig enters into and is locked in the upper pig receiver


76


, as shown in FIG.


18


.




The pig may be pumped back to the lower pig receiver


75


by pumping water (or mud) from the upper side. Sufficient pump pressure from the upper side is introduced to release the pig from the upper pig receiver


76


. However, the piston


84


is not released at this stage, because of the fact that a much higher pump pressure (or pressure difference) is required in order to release the piston from the locking means


89


.




When the pig is pumped down through the well pipe, the hydrocarbons below the pig will be pumped back and into the reservoir formation (where they came from).




When the pig


77


is back in place in the lower pig receiver


75


, the pig stops moving, and the pump pressure then acts on the piston


84


to release this from its locking position. This situation is shown in FIG.


19


. When releasing the piston, this begins moving downwards and thereby frees the flow openings


88


, so that fluid (water) above the pig is allowed to flow through the pig.




The piston


84


is gradually pumped back to the lower position in the piston housing


83


, and water displaces hydrocarbons within and below the pig. The ball


90


begins moving back to the upper position because of the changes in fluid density and buoyancy. This situation is shown in FIG.


20


. When the ball is back in its upper position, the inlet opening


88


at the bottom of the piston housing is closed, and full communication and circulation (both ways) through the pig is established.




Another possible embodiment with respect to introduction of equipment within the pig, is a downhole valve that can be operated (opened and closed) from the surface (for example on a rig) by means of telemetric signals. The valve will be opened when flowing water through the pig, and closed when hydrocarbons are identified as flowing through the pig. A density identifier may be connected to the downhole valve, and may transmit flow information (density of produced fluid) to the surface, thus indicating when the valve should be opened or closed.



Claims
  • 1. A method of testing a borehole in an underground formation by the use of so-called closed chamber testing, wherein a test pipe (5) is lowered into the borehole (1), which pipe is closable at its upper end and at its lower end is provided with a downhole assembly (6) comprising equipment for testing of fluid flow from the formation (3), the annulus (23) between the test pipe and a casing (20) in the borehole being shut off during the test by a gasket (22) at a desired depth, and fluid from the formation being allowed to flow through the test pipe (5) to a collecting tank (9) coupled to the test pipe at the upper end thereof, characterized in that, in a pipe section at the lower end of the test pipe (5), there is releasably retained a pig (30) forming a barrier between formation fluid and a lightweight damping fluid (7) filling the test pipe above the pig, the pig (30) being released at the start of the test and being moved in a controlled manner upwards in the pipe (5) as a result of a positive pressure difference between the fluid below and above the pig.
  • 2. A method according to claim 1, characterized in that the pig (30) is released as a result of the positive pressure difference between the fluids below and above the pig.
  • 3. A method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that formation fluid at the start of the test is allowed to be conducted past the pig (30) and into the test pipe (5) via a valve means (24) at a place above the pig, and that the valve means is closed after that formation fluid has displaced an estimated volume of damping fluid upwards in the test pipe (5), so that the flow path past the pig (30) is shut off and the underside of the pig is subjected to well pressure, whereafter the pig is released when the differential pressure across the pig has obtained a predetermined value.
  • 4. A method according to claim 1 or 2, characterized in that the test is terminated automatically as a result of the fact that the pig (30) enters into a pig receiver (40;44) at a chosen place in the upper part of the test pipe (5).
  • 5. A system for testing a borehole in an underground formation by the use of so-called closed chamber testing, comprising a test pipe (5) which is adapted to be lowered into the borehole (1) and at its lower end is provided with a downhole assembly (6) comprising equipment for testing of fluid flow from the formation (3), a gasket (22) for shutting off the annulus (23) between the test pipe (5) and a casing (20) in the borehole, and a collecting tank (9) coupled to the test pipe via a flow head (4) at the upper end of the test pipe, characterized in that it comprises a pig (30) arranged to be retained releasably and in a sealing manner in a pipe section at the lower end of the test pipe (5), and a reservoir (12) for a lightweight damping fluid (7) arranged to be supplied to the test pipe (5) via the flow head (4), in order to substantially fill the test pipe above the pig (30) at the state of the test, so that the pig forms a barrier between fluid from the formation and the damping fluid above the pig.
  • 6. A system according to claim 5, characterized in that the pig (30) comprises a sleeve-shaped body (32) having a through-going passage (33) which is blocked by a closing element (34), and an external, resiliently expandable sealing means (35) for sealing abutment against the inner wall of the test pipe (5).
  • 7. A system according to claim 5, characterized in that the pig (30) is provided with spring-loaded dogs (36) for releasable engagement in a ring groove (37) in an inner wall of a launcher sub (31) for the pig, the spring force being adapted in such a manner that the pig (30) is released from the ring groove at a predetermined pressure difference across the pig.
  • 8. A system according to claim 6, characterized in that the closing element (34) of the pig is arranged to be removed from the pass ate (33) at a certain overpressure on the upper side of the element, so that the passage of the pig (30) is opened for thorough-flow.
  • 9. A system according to any one of claims 5-8, characterized in that the test pipe (5) comprises an upper part having a larger internal diameter than the lower part of the pipe, and that the pig (50) is arranged to co-operate with an additional pig member (31) for slidable sealing engagement against the inner wall of the upper part of the test pipe (5), the pig (50) being arranged to be introduced into and locked in a sealing manner at the lower end of a through going passage (52) in the additional pig member (51).
  • 10. A system according to claim 9, characterized in that the pig (50) at its upper end is provided with outwards projecting dogs (53) for engagement in an annular locking groove (54) at the lower end of the passage (52) through the additional pig member (51).
  • 11. A system according to claim 6, characterized in that the test pipe (5) comprises a pig receiver (60; 67) which is provided with at least one side channel (61; 68) for fluid flow, and with a spring means (64; 71) arranged to be influenced by a pig (50; 51) situated in the pig receiver (60, 67), the sealing means (58) of the pig being arranged to shut off the side channel (61; 68) when the pig is not pressure influenced, and to open the side channel by compressing the spring means (64; 71) by an external pressure influence on the pig in the compression direction of the spring.
  • 12. A system according to claim 5, characterized in that the pig (77) comprises a pig body (78) forming a piston housing (83) for receiving a piston (84), and having a bottom wall (85) with an inlet opening (86) and a wall member (87) with upper ports (88) allowing flow of fluid through the pig when the piston (84) is in a lower position in the piston housing, the piston in an upper position causing closing of the ports (88), and that a device (90, 91) is provided causing opening or closing of the inlet opening (86) of the piston housing (83) in dependence of the surrounding fluid.
  • 13. A system according to claim 12, characterized in that the device for opening/closing consists of a ball body (90) which is movable in a guide sleeve (91) towards and away from the inlet opening (86), the ball body (90) having a density which is smaller than the density of water, but larger than the density of presumably produced hydrocarbons.
Priority Claims (1)
Number Date Country Kind
19991577 Mar 1999 NO
PCT Information
Filing Document Filing Date Country Kind
PCT/NO00/00110 WO 00
Publishing Document Publishing Date Country Kind
WO00/58604 10/5/2000 WO A
US Referenced Citations (7)
Number Name Date Kind
4413370 Payne et al. Nov 1983 A
4498932 Kruka Feb 1985 A
4766955 Petermann Aug 1988 A
5295279 Cooper Mar 1994 A
5797993 Woehleke Aug 1998 A
6390200 Allamon et al. May 2002 B1
6467546 Allamon et al. Oct 2002 B2
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
0 092 975 Nov 1983 EP
0 903 464 Mar 1999 EP
0 903 464 Mar 1999 EP