The present invention relates to a method and system for the automatic piloting of an aircraft on the approach to an airdrop position.
In order to carry out an airdrop, for example of hardware and/or troops, it is generally necessary for the aircraft, for example a military transport plane, to arrive at the airdrop position planned during mission preparation at a predetermined arrival time, so as to be able to make the airdrop at the scheduled time, in particular when troops are on the ground to receive the airdropped elements. Moreover, to facilitate the airdrop, it is preferable for the aircraft to arrive at said airdrop position with a constant predetermined speed.
Also, to be able to fulfill these conditions, a particular speed profile with decreasing speed is generally determined and is applied to the aircraft during the approach phase, between the cruising speed and said predetermined airdrop speed. Moreover, to facilitate the work of the releaser and to avoid too much jerkiness, such a speed profile generally comprises a plurality of constant-speed levels separated by deceleration phases.
Of course, this speed profile is determined during mission preparation. It takes no account of the wind.
Under these conditions, the predetermined speed profile is not optimal and does not make it possible to reach the airdrop position at the scheduled arrival time so that the airdrop is then made either early or late relative to the scheduled time.
An object of the present invention is to remedy these drawbacks. It relates to a method of automatic piloting of an aircraft during a phase of approach to a predetermined airdrop position, at which an airdrop is to be made from said aircraft, making it possible to devise and apply to said aircraft an optimal speed profile which allows the latter to reach said airdrop position exactly at the initially scheduled time.
For this purpose, said method, according to which:
Thus, by virtue of the invention, the speed profile is corrected, if necessary, in such a way as to have (and to apply to the aircraft) permanently an optimal speed profile making it possible to reach said airdrop position at said predetermined theoretical arrival time.
This correction may be made throughout the approach phase. Moreover, it is implemented automatically, thereby allowing the crew to be unburdened of this task and to concentrate on other tasks or actions that are necessary, in particular with a view to the airdrop.
Furthermore, said correction is made in a simple and fast manner, but without modifying the overall aspect of the speed profile.
When said actual arrival time is later than said theoretical arrival time, that is to say when the aircraft is late, advantageously, the length of at least one first level exhibiting a first constant speed is increased, and the length of at least one second level exhibiting a second constant speed is decreased, said first speed being greater than said second speed.
In this case, advantageously, said first level is increased and said second level is decreased by one and the same length xa which satisfies the following relation:
in which:
Furthermore, when said actual arrival time is earlier than said theoretical arrival time, that is to say when the aircraft is early, advantageously, the length of at least one first level exhibiting a first constant speed is decreased, and the length of at least one second level exhibiting a second constant speed is increased, said first speed being greater than said second speed.
In this case, advantageously, said first level is decreased and said second level is increased by one and the same length xb which satisfies the following relation:
in which:
In a particular embodiment:
The present invention also relates to a system for the automatic piloting of an aircraft so as to pilot said aircraft at least during a phase of approach to a predetermined airdrop position, at which an airdrop is to be made from said aircraft.
According to the invention, said system of the type comprising:
In a particular embodiment, said first means comprises a diskette, on which is recorded said speed profile, and which-can be read, with the aid of a suitable means of reading, by said automatic piloting device, this making it possible to devise the speed profile during mission preparation and to record it on said diskette. It is then sufficient to simply enter said diskette into said reading means in order for the automatic piloting device to take account of said recorded speed profile, thus making it possible to considerably decrease the workload of the crew.
Furthermore, advantageously, said third means is integrated into said automatic piloting device.
The figures of the appended drawing will elucidate the manner in which the invention may be embodied. In these figures, identical references designate similar elements.
The system 1 in accordance with the invention and represented diagrammatically in
Said system 1 comprises:
To be able to automatically update said speed profile PV, essentially when the aircraft is in said approach phase, said system 1 moreover comprises:
According to the invention, the speed profile PV, whose speed V is applied to the aircraft between an earlier cruising phase at constant speed VC and the airdrop position 9 reached at a speed V1 comprises, as represented in
Since the speeds V1, V2 and V3 are constant values, as is said deceleration factor a, the same holds for the distances d1 and d2 for switching respectively from the speeds V2 to V1 and V3 to V2 or the corresponding times t1 and t2 necessary for this deceleration. Specifically, these parameters satisfy the following relations:
The same holds for any parameter tn or dn between a speed Vn+1 of a level Pn+1 and a speed Vn of a level Pn according to:
According to the invention, said device 3 comprises:
In a particular embodiment, said means 2 comprises a diskette 17, on which is recorded said speed profile PV, and which can be read, with the aid of a means of reading 18, by said automatic piloting device 3.
This makes it possible to devise the speed profile PV during mission preparation and to record it on said diskette 17. It is then sufficient to simply enter said diskette 17 into said reading means 18 in order for the automatic piloting device 13 to take account of said recorded speed profile PV, thus making it possible to considerably decrease the workload of the crew.
More precisely, according to the invention, when said actual arrival time Teff is later than said theoretical arrival time TO, that is to say when the aircraft is late with respect to the scheduled time, in order to make up for this lateness, the length of at least one first level, for example the level P3, exhibiting a first constant speed (for example V3) is increased, and the length of at least one second level, for example the level P2, exhibiting a second constant speed (for example V2) which is less than said first constant speed (for example V3) is decreased.
In this case, when the length of only said two levels P3 and P2 is modified, said level P3 is increased and said level P2 is decreased by one and the same length x1 which satisfies the following relation:
The level P3 then exhibits a length L3a=L3+x1 and the level P2 a length L2a=L2−x1, as represented in
Such a modification of the length of level is possible up to a maximum value of x1 which satisfies:
x1=D2−D1−d1,
this corresponding to a maximum lateness that can be made up for of
Δt=(D2−D1−d1).(V3−V2)/(V3.V2).
It will be noted that D1, D2 and D3 represent the distances between the airdrop position 9 and the starts respectively of said levels P1, P2 and P3, as represented in
It will be furthermore noted that the time required to reach the airdrop position 9, from the start of the level P3, is:
ti=(D3−D2−d2)/V3+t2+(D2−D1−d1)/V2+t2+D1/V1,
with the uncorrected initial speed profile PV of
tj=(D3+x1−D2−d2)/V3+t2+(D2−D1−x1−d1)/V2+t1+D1/V1,
with the corrected speed profile PVa of
Additionally, according to the invention, when said actual arrival time Teff is earlier than said theoretical arrival time TO, that is to say when the aircraft is early with respect to the scheduled time, in order to cancel this earliness, the length of at least one first level, for example the level P3, exhibiting a first constant speed (for example V3) is decreased, and the length of at least one second level, for example the level P2, exhibiting a second constant speed (for example V2) which is less than said first constant speed (for example V3) is increased.
In this case, when the length of only the two levels P3 and P2 is modified, said level P3 is increased and said level P2 is decreased by one and the same length x2 which satisfies the following relation:
The level P3 then exhibits a length L3b=L3−x2 and the level P2 a length L2b=L2+x2, as represented in
Such a modification is possible up to a maximum value of x2 which satisfies:
x2=D3−D2−d2,
this corresponding to a maximum earliness that can be delayed of
Δt=(D3−D2−d2).(V3−V2)/(V3.V2).
It will be noted that the time tk required to reach the airdrop position 9, from the start of the level P3, then satisfies the relation:
tk=(D3−D2−d2−x1)/V3+t2+(D2−D1−d1+x1)/V2+t1+D1/V1,
with the corrected speed profile Pvb of
More generally, when the speed profile PV comprises n levels P1, P2, . . . , Pn−2, Pn−1, Pn, respectively of constant speeds V1 to Vn, as represented partially in
Thus, by applying it between a level Pn and a level Pn−1, it is possible:
If such a duration tl or tm is insufficient, it is possible to carry out the same operation between two other levels, for example the levels Pn−1 and Pn−2 of the speed profile, and so and so forth if necessary.
In a particular embodiment, it is possible to decrease the length of a level Pn−1 until it is completely eliminated, as represented in
In this case, the corrected speed profile PVc exhibits a level Pn of length Lnc=Ln+Ln−1 and the deceleration phase Ec between the levels Pn and Pn−2 exhibits the length (and hence the duration) of the two initial deceleration phases En−1 and En−2 represented in
On the other hand, if it is necessary to delay earliness, this length Ln−1 of the eliminated level Pn−1 is transmitted to a level Pn−2 at lower constant speed Vn−2.
Consequently, the system 1 in accordance with the invention corrects, if necessary, the speed profile PV in such a way as to have (and to apply to the aircraft) permanently an optimal speed profile making it possible to reach said airdrop position 9 at said predetermined theoretical arrival time TO.
This correction may be made throughout the approach phase. Moreover, it is implemented automatically by said system 1, thereby allowing the crew to be unburdened of this task and to concentrate on other tasks or actions that are necessary, in particular with a view to the airdrop.
Furthermore, the correction implemented by the system 1 is made in a simple and fast manner, but without modifying the overall aspect of the speed profile PV.
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 03 14242 | Dec 2003 | FR | national |
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 3875379 | Vietor | Apr 1975 | A |
| 4709336 | Zweifel | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4750127 | Leslie et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 5377937 | LaMay et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5867804 | Pilley et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 6507782 | Rumbo et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
| 6832153 | Thayer et al. | Dec 2004 | B2 |
| 7219011 | Barber | May 2007 | B1 |
| 7283895 | Bouchet | Oct 2007 | B2 |
| 7346437 | Petillon | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0637787 | Feb 1995 | EP |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20050143904 A1 | Jun 2005 | US |